Role of CIM for Power System Model Exchange: Europe - ENTSO-E Experience with CIM
description
Transcript of Role of CIM for Power System Model Exchange: Europe - ENTSO-E Experience with CIM
Role of CIM for Power System Model Exchange: Europe - ENTSO-E Experience with CIM
CIM Users GroupFebruary 26, 2013 Melbourne, Australia
Chavdar Ivanov, PhDResearch and Development Senior Advisor, ENTSO-E
41 TSOs, 34 countries
534 million citizens served
305,000 km of transmission lines
950 GW generation3,300 TWh/year demand
440 TWh/year exchanges
ENTSO-E represents the European Transmission System Operators
ENTSO-E has a significant role in deliveringEuropean energy and climate change objectives
Key activities set out in Regulation 714/2009 (on cross-border electricity trade, part of the 3rd Internal Energy Market Package)
• Deliver network codes binding to all network users (Comitology)• Ten-Year Network Development Plan “TYNDP”• Enable internal market (“market coupling”)• R&D Roadmap (fully included in EEGI – the SET Plan)
Through its members deliver the infrastructure to:• Deliverable markets to function• Secure energy supply• Meet climate change objectives with RES
Drivers for pan-European grid development
...allrequire gridcapacity !
Sustainability• More renewables far
from loads• New electricity uses
(mobility with electricity, heat pumps...)
Competitiveness / Market integration
• Optimal resources sharing
• More long distance trans-European flows
Security of Supply• Continuity of supply
of remote/isolated areas
• Prevent large disturbances
EU energy policy goals…
Milestones for European grid development
2050
80-95% reduction in greenhouse gases with higher reduction for the electricity sector
2012
320 GW of RES 538 GW of peak load 3300 TWh demand
2020 – TYNDP 2012
536 GW of RES 567 GW of peak load3600 TWh demand
2014 TYNDP
2030 visions
Time horizons addressed in the Network Codes:
Year ahead: outage coordination (NC OPS), Forward Capacity Calculation (NC FCA)
Month ahead: Forward Capacity Calculation (NC FCA), Regional Operational Security Assessment (current business needs)
Week ahead: Regional Operational Security Assessment (NC OPS) Two days ahead: Capacity Calculation for D-1 market (NC CACM) Day ahead: Operational Security assessment, model corrections and assessment
of remedial actions (NC OPS), Capacity Calculation for Intraday market (NC CACM)
Intraday: Regional Operational Security Assessment (NC OPS) Updates for outage plans upon request by Outage planning agents Regional security assessment requires at least Common Grid Models for the
whole synchronous area
All requires data with high quality!!!
Definitions
ConsistencyInterpretation
Data has to be collected
Data has to be maintained
Data needs to be reused by different systems for different studies
ENTSO-E and CIM - history
2004-2006: TSOs identified the need for more detailed exchange; thinking on improving data exchanges
2007-2008: interactions with IEC and CIMug and decisions on direction towards CIM
2009: 1st profile for network model exchange; In parallel market effort on CIM are increasing
2009-2013:Development process for profile 2 (current CGMES) Series of interoperability tests
– to prove vendors‘ implementation of profile 1- to valudate draft standards and support development
Dec 2013: Approval of teh Common Grid Model Exchange Standard (CGMES)
Why CIM is important for TSOs and ENTSO-E?; ENTSO-E legal obligations
TYNDP development process requires consistent dataNetwork codes require – Common Grid ModelTSOs exchanges require HVDC, dynamics, operational level
details to be exchanged, etc.The data consistency between planning, operation, market
systems will be improved over time if a harmonized common conceptual model is used
Better common studies if a common data exchange language available. Huge benefits for TSO cooperation
More and more important to have frequent and reliable exchange in the frame of system operation
Identified gaps/issues and relates measuresENTSO-E profile 1 (UML14v02) while IEC CIM14 (UML14v15)
Process to discuss issues in IEC and CIMug
Description of profiles; rules definition
ENTSO-E will work with OCL rules as much as possible; clearer profiles
Vendors are not obliged to test CIM exports/imports when changing tool version
ENTSO-E Conformity Assessment Process
Standardisation is voluntaryLink with R&D projects is weak“Maturity” of tools user friendliness
Projects to support standardisation; Interactions with R&D projects and vendors
CGMES approval
• On 18 Dec 2013 ENTSO-E Assembly approved the Common Grid Model Exchange Standard (CGMES) v.2.4.13.
• CGMES is approved as a baseline data exchange standard for the EU operational and market Network Codes
• CACM : Capacity Allocation an Congestion Management• FCA : Forward Capacity Allocation• OS : Operational Security• OPS : Operational Planning & Scheduling
• CGMES will also be used for system development studies data exchanges including ENTSO-E Ten Year Network Development Plan related studies
CGMES content
• CGMES is a superset of draft IEC standards to be issued for IEC CIM16• CGMES was developed in the last 4 years and covers:
• Bus-branch and node-breaker representation • Exchange of solved and unsolved load flow models
(combinations of equipment, topology, steady state hypothesis and state variables profiles)
• Exchange of diagram layout• Exchange of geographical location (GIS)• Exchange of dynamics models
Significant update of transformer modeling was done and HVDC representation was introduced
CGMES documentation
• Main page on CIM – link• Version 2.3.13 is available here• Information on CGMES conformity process will be available here
The documentation includes the following:• Main document – standard, which defines the framework and sets rules• HTML documents – exported for each profile belonging to the CGMES.
Specific profile rules are defined in these documents• HTML Enterprise Architect export – identical view of the UML model as in EA• RDFS export – RDF schema for each profile belonging to the CGMES• XMI export – directly exported from EA; contains all profiles• CGMES issue list – this list should be used to report issues on the CGMES.
Issues should be sent to [email protected]
Activities related to CGMES implementation
CGMES Implementation Roadmap – internal document which defines a series of projects and
tasks to implement CGMES and reach a stage when CGMES based exchanges are put in
operationCERTI-I – internal project:•Phase I (2013)•List necessary use cases;
•Develop requirements for test models to be used in conformity assessment program
•Identify options for conformity assessment
•Phase II (Jan-May 2014)•Develop conformity assessment program for the selected option
CERTI-II – internal project with vendor participation:• Duration: Jan-Jun 2014
• Deliverables:•Develop test models/data to be used in the conformity assessment program. Currently assessment of offers
•Develop test procedures (test scripts) to be used in the conformity tests
PROFI – internal project •Duration: Jan – July 2014
•Objective to further develop CGMES (issue new version) to address all (the most urgent) requirements defined in the Network codes (CGMES currently covers 73% of the requirements)
•IEC WG13 will be kept informed on the CIM extensions proposals coming form this projects. Discussions will be arranged in the frame of the liaison with IEC.
Dynamics profile implementation•Objective: harmonized implementation of the CGMES dynamics profile by vendors
•An effort launched in Dec 2013. Expected finalization in Sep-Oct 2014
•Vendors participating in the effort: DIgSILENT (Power Factory), Tractebel/RTE (Eurostag), CESI (SICRE), BCP (Neplan), Siemens (PSS/ODMS, PSS/E, Netomac), CEPS (own tool)
Interoperability testing•IOP 2014 – will be held in Brussels in the week of 14 July 2014
Other tasks•TSOs activities to gather different data to satisfy requirements for the data exchanges (requirements in the Network codes, TYNDP and other needs).
IOP in 2014 – the two objectives
Testing of the commercial releases of the tools• Conformity testing for tools using CGMES v2.4.13 – the
process to be prepared in the frame of conformity assessment program
Testing of the CGMES extensions established in PROFI project• Testing of the interoperability of the updated CGMES
version – a standard vetting type of IOP tests to validate the new version of the CGMES; Vendors using prototype tools as usual
ENTSO-E IOP site in the CIMug
ENTSO-E Conformity Assessment Program
Under development – to be ready for IOP – July 2014PolicyTest configurations – “golden” modelsTest procedures and clear assessment rules
Simplified approach to be applied at first stageMain stages: Vendor issues conformity declaration Vendor requests ENTSO-E Conformity AssessmentENTSO-E performs Conformity AssessmentENTSO-E issues an Opinion which is publicly availableTSOs use tested tools (which have positive ENTSO-E
Opinion) in the data exchanges
ENTSO-E Network Modelling Database
18
ENTSO-E Secretariat
TSO
Sharing TSO’s
To be Situation
As Is Situation
?
TIE-LINEManagement
ASSEMBLING Network Model
NETWORKMODEL Collection
IOP
Model VALIDATION
Consolidated Platform
eTerraSource
Before
After
Situations management
Assembling management