Results from LArGe@MPI-K M. Di Marco, P. Peiffer, S. Schönert Thanks to Davide Franco and Marik...
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Results from LArGe@MPI-K M. Di Marco, P. Peiffer, S. Schönert Thanks to Davide Franco and Marik...
Results from LArGe@MPI-K
M. Di Marco, P. Peiffer, S. Schönert
Thanks to Davide Franco and Marik Barnabe Heider
Gerda collaboration meeting, Tübingen 9th-11th November 2005
goal: study and quantify background suppression with LAr scintillation
Outline
• Resolution of bare Ge in LAr• Experimental Setup of LArGe@MPI-K
– DAQ– Operational parameters– Background spectrum
• Characterization with various -sources– 137Cs, 60Co, 226Ra, 232Th– bkgd suppression in RoI
• Outlook on LArGe@LNGS• Conclusions
Proof of feasibility: bare p-type detectors in LAr
No deterioration of energy-resolution for p-type detectors in LAr !
Resolution in LN 2.3 keV
Resolution in LAr 2.3 keV
Data taken at DSG in Mainz
Trigger on Ge-signal
Record Ge-signal and LAr-signal simultaneously
Shaping 3 µs
Gate width = 6 µs
No hardware veto
PMT
Ge-crystal ( 5.1 cm, h=3.5 cm)∅
LAr inDewar ( 29 cm)∅
Continously flushed with gaseous Argon
Filling and emptying
Monitor filling level (with temperature sensors)
Calibrate PMT (trough optical fibre with UV-LED)
WLS and reflector (VM-2000)
Internal source
External source
5 cm lead + underground lab (15 mwe)
Schematic system description
System is designed to be air tight to prevent quenching of LAr scintillation by O2 or H2O
Operational parameters
Canberra p-type crystal (390 g)
Running stable since several weeks
Stability monitoring by:• peak position• resolution• leakage current
Not optimized for energy resolution:• long signal cables• FET outside system• pickup of external noise
Energy resolution OK: ~4.5 keV FWHM w/o PMT~5 keV with PMTAt 1,3 MeV 60Co-line
PMT threshold set at ~1 single photoelectron (spe)
1 spe ≈ 5 keV energy depositionin LAr
source Ge-rate LAr-rate Random coinc.
Back-ground
7 Hz 2,1 kHz 1,2 %
60Co int. 600 Bq
17 Hz 2,8 kHz 1,68 %
226Ra int. 1kBq
23 Hz 3,2 kHz 1,92 %
Gain in background suppression is not compromised by signal loss due to
random coincidences !
Background spectrum
40K
40 counts/h
208Tl
10 counts/h
energy in Ge (MeV)
Ge signal Ge signal
(no veto)(no veto)
Ge signal after veto:Ge signal after veto:
fraction of the signal fraction of the signal which „survives“ the cutwhich „survives“ the cut
Background spectrum
baseline:
41% survival
40K
40 counts/h
93% survival 208Tl
10 counts/h
93% survival
energy in Ge (MeV)
Calibration with different sources
137Cs : single line at 662 keV full energy peak :no suppression with
LAr veto
Compton continuum:suppressed by LAr veto
137Csreal data
simulations
662 keV
100% survival
662 keV
100% survival
Compton continuum:
20% survival
Compton continuum:
20% survival
very well reproduced by MaGe :
shape of energy spectrum
peak efficiency
peak/Compton ratio same thing for 60Co (ext),
232Th (int, ext), 226Ra (int)
geometry + basic physics processes well understood
137Cs
for now, veto simulated as a sharp energy threshold with
arbitrary value
suppression by LAr overestimated in more
complex cases
next:
proper threshold for spe (Poisson statistics)
calibration of LAr scintillation
Calibration with different sources
60Co : two lines (1.1 and 1.3 MeV) in cascade
external : high probability that only 1 reaches the crystal acts as 2 single lines
internal : if one reaches the crystal, 2nd will deposit its energy in LAr
full energy peaks :no suppression with
LAr veto
full energy peak :suppressed by LAr veto
Compton continuum:suppressed by LAr veto
60Co (external)
30% 30%
shielding of the source not implemented in MaGe yet
100%
~20% ~20%
60Co (internal)
12% 40% weak source :
208Tl from bkgd is visible
100% survival
summation peak:
both in crystal
100% survival
12%
Calibration with different sources
137Cs : single line at 662 keV
60Co : two lines (1.1 and 1.3 MeV) in cascade full-E peak no suppression if external full-E peak suppressed if internal
232Th : dominated by 208Tl 511 keV – 583 keV – 2.6 MeV : prompt cascade 860 keV – 2.6 MeV : prompt cascade no suppression if external suppressed if internal
226Ra : dominated by 214Bi 609 keV and 1.120 keV : prompt cascade
suppressed if internal 1.764 MeV - 2.448 MeV : direct decay
no suppression
Compton continuum:suppressed by LAr veto
232Th (external)
33%
25% 25%
RoI
2.6 MeV
83%
208Tl simulated
2.6 MeV
76%
583 keV : 70%
29%
18% 19%
232Th (internal)
208Tl simulated
30%
9,5%
14%
9,5%
RoI
26% (mc 15%)
weak souce (400 Bq over 3cm) contribution from
208Tl bkgd in real data
4%
12%
4%
92%
30%
226Ra (internal)
214Bi simulated
27%
RoI
30% (mc 23%)
30%
28%
19%
13%
Summary of background suppressionfor LArGe-MPIK setup
full energy peak :no suppression
by LAr veto
Compton continuum:suppressed by LAr veto
full energy peak :suppressed by LAr veto
No efficiency loss expected for 0ßß-events
Suppression factors limited by radius of the active volume.
R = 10 cm significant amount of ‘s escape without depositing energy in LAr
Source 137Cs 60Co (ext)1.3 MeV
232Th (ext.)583 keV
2.6 MeV
RoI
60Co (int) 1.3 MeV
232Th (int) 583 keV
2.6 MeV
RoI
226Ra (int)609 keV
2,4 MeV
RoI
Compton
continuum 20% ~ 30% ~ 25 – 33% 12% 9.5-14% 19-27%
full-E
peak 100% 100% ~ 100% 40% ~ 30%30%
100%
Outlook: LArGe @ Gran Sasso
Bi-214
Tl-208
Examples:Background suppression for contaminations locatedin detector support
3.3·10-3 survival
survival: 10%
LArGe suppression method and segmentation are orthogonal ! Suppression factors multiplicative
Diameter = 90 cm. No significant escapes. Suppression limited by non-active materials.
Conclusions
• LAr does not deteriorate resolution of p-type crystals
• Experimental data shows that– LAr veto is a powerful method for background
suppression– No relevant loss of 0ßß signal
• Results will be improved in larger setup @LNGS
• MaGe simulations reproduce well the data– Work in progress