Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

39
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) MASFPS LANSING, MICHIGAN NOVEMBER, 2008 Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street NW Washington, DC 20007 (202) 965- 3652 www.bruman.com [email protected] 1

description

Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008. Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street NW Washington, DC 20007 (202) 965- 3652 www.bruman.com [email protected]. Response to Intervention . How it may be part of a federal program. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Page 1: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI)

MASFPSLANSING, MICHIGANNOVEMBER, 2008Leigh ManasevitBrustein & Manasevit3105 South Street NW Washington, DC 20007(202) 965- [email protected]

1

Page 2: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION

How it may be part of a federal program

2

Page 3: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION-RTI-

What is it?What are the implications for Federal Fund expenditures?

3

Page 4: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI: What Is It?4

Early intervention though a tiered model to provide appropriate instruction

Utilization of scientific research based instructional techniques

Decision making based on the response to the intervention

Page 5: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI: What Does It Do?5

Predicts At Risk students Provides early and individualized

research based interventions May avoid over identification as

disabled

Page 6: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI: Generally Structured into Tiers

6

Tier 3

Tier 2

Tier 1

Specialized Highly Individualized Intervention (Instruction)At Risk LD & SLD-More Intense

SupportIdentifies Students who do not respond to intervention of Tier 2 and refers to Tier 3General Education Program-

predicts At Risk Students for Tier 2

Page 7: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI – Implications for Federal Funds

7

WRONG – Can I use federal funds to pay for RTI?

RIGHT – Can RTI be an allowable part of a federally funded program?

Page 8: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Examples of Federal Programs Where RTI Might Fit:

8

IDEA NCLB Title I, Part A Title III

Page 9: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI9

IDEA Early Intervening Services

(EIS) (15% LEA Grant) Voluntary unless

significant dis-proportionality

Page 10: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI10

EIS-Eligible Student K-12 (Emphasis on K-3) who

are not currently identified as IDEA eligible, but who need additional academic and behavioral support

Page 11: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI11

RTI for EIS eligible students Additional Behavior / Education

Support

Success Evaluation for IDEA

Page 12: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI12

IDEA LEA flow through funds (not EIS

funds) eligible students – identified as IDEA Eligible (have IEPs)

Eligible uses (services) special education and related services consistent with IEP

Question: Are the RTI services part of IEP?

Page 13: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI13

NCLB Title I, Part A WRONG - Can I use Title I funds to

pay for RTI? RIGHT – Can RTI be part of a Title

I, Part A program?

Page 14: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI in Title I, Part A Programs14

Title I, Part A programs Targeted Assistance Schoolwide

Page 15: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI15

Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance Title I services only for eligible

students

Page 16: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Targeted Assistance Schools (TAS)16

Must identify eligible students: Students failing, or most at risk of

failing, to meet the state’s challenging student academic achievement standards

Migrant Neglected and Delinquent Homeless Head Start, Even Start, Early

Reading First

Page 17: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

TAS Eligibility17

Identifying eligible students: Multiple, educationally related, objective criteria developed by LEA

If preschool-grade 2, judgment of teacher, interviews with parents, and other developmentally appropriate means

Eligibility is not based on poverty

Page 18: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Components of TAS18

Use resources to help ID’d students Incorporate into existing planning Effective methods and instructional

strategies based on scientifically based research Extended learning time Accelerated, high quality curriculum Minimize removal from classroom

during regular hours Does RTI fit here?

Page 19: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Components of TAS (cont.)19

Coordinate with regular ed program Highly qualified teachers Professional development Parental involvement Coordinate with other federal, state,

and local services and programs

Page 20: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Schoolwide20

Consolidate federal, state, and local funds to upgrade the entire educational program Except Reading First

Ensure all children meet standards, particularly those most at risk

Requirement: 40% poverty Schoolwide plan

Page 21: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Schoolwide Flexibility21

Exemption from program requirements Not IDEA Other exceptions (health, safety,

parental) Must meet “intents and purposes” of

program – Does RTI meet intents and purposes of any of the consolidated programs?

Not required to ID particular children or provide only extra services

Page 22: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Components of SWP22

One year planning period1. Needs assessment2. Schoolwide reform strategies that:

a. Increase the amount & quality of learning time (extended year, before- and after-school)

b. Address needs of all, but particularly low-achieving

Page 23: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Components of SWP (cont.)23

3. Instruction by “highly qualified” teachers4. Professional development5. Strategies to attract high quality teachers6. Parental involvement7. Transition from pre-school8. Include teachers in assessment decisions9. Timely, effective additional assistance10. Coordination and integrationIs RTI part of the schoolwide program?

Page 24: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Heightened Federal Monitoring on SWP

24

OIG monitoring: Description of how school implement components Description of how school will use resources to

implement List of SEA and LEA programs and other federal

programs that will be consolidated Description of how school will provide individual

academic assessments results in language parent can understand, including interpretations of results

Page 25: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Close attention to plan development requirements:

25

Developing over one-year period Developed with involvement of

parents and other members of the community, including teachers, principals, administrators, etc

In effect for duration of school’s participation

Available to LEA, parents, and the public in understandable and uniform format

If appropriate developed in coordination with RF, ERF, Even Start, Perkins, and Head Start

Page 26: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

26

Title III Can RTI be a part of a Title III

program? What are allowable activities?

Increasing student academic achievement

Effective instructional strategies Intensified instruction

Page 27: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

27

Title III Who are eligible Title III students?

Limited English Proficient Students

Page 28: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

General Considerations28

RTI Scientifically Based Research –

instructional or other methodologies paid in Federal Funds – must be based on scientifically Based Research

Page 29: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI General Considerations29

Supplement NOT Supplant EIS LEA Flow Through Title I Targeted Assistance Title I Schoolwide

Page 30: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant

30

Presume supplanting in 3 situations:1. Used federal funds to provide services the

SEA or LEA is required to make available under other federal, state or local laws

2. Used federal funds to provide services the SEA or LEA provided with state or local funds in the prior year

Some programs (IDEA, Title V) will presume if used other federal funds in the prior year

Page 31: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant

31

Used Title I, Part A or Migrant Education Program (MEP) funds to provide the same services to Title I or MEP students that the LEA or SEA provides with state or local funds to nonparticipating students

Page 32: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant

32

IDEA EIS – must supplement any ESEA

EIS services [34 CFR 226(e)] No supplement not supplant

requirement for state/local funds [34 CFR 208 (a)]

Page 33: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant

33

IDEA Flow Through Rules

Normal non-supplant applyCaution – remember IDEA non-supplant INCLUDES Federal

Page 34: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant

34

Title I, Part A Targeted AssistanceA. Must be a Supplemental ServiceB. Must be a Supplement

Expenditure

Page 35: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant

35

NOT A – Modified B -

The LEA must ensure that the SW gets all the State and local funds it would have received were it not a Title I SW school. (E-18 February 2008 Fiscal Guidance http://www.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/fiscalguid.doc)

Page 36: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

36

RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant

Title IIISupplement State, Local and Federal Funds

Page 37: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

37

Supplant Caution

Cannot Provide Title I Schools with Title I Funded Services

If Non-Title I Get Same Services (Limited Exception Only)

Page 38: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

QUESTIONS???

38

Page 39: Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED SOLELY TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE OR A LEGAL SERVICE.  THIS PRESENTATION DOES NOT CREATE A CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP WITH BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT AND, THEREFORE, CARRIES NONE OF THE PROTECTIONS UNDER THE D.C. RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.  ATTENDANCE AT THIS PRESENTATION, A LATER REVIEW OF ANY PRINTED OR ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, OR ANY FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS OR COMMUNICATIONS ARISING OUT OF THIS PRESENTATION WITH ANY ATTORNEY AT BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP WITH BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT.  YOU SHOULD NOT TAKE ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION WITHOUT FIRST CONSULTING LEGAL COUNSEL FAMILIAR WITH YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

39