RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO:...

10
RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Design Sheila Kannappan UNC Chapel Hill

Transcript of RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO:...

Page 1: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Design

Sheila KannappanUNC Chapel Hill

Page 2: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

• volume-limited, unusually complete census of dynamical, stellar, and gas mass, plus star formation/merging/chemical evolution, from dwarf galaxy to cluster scales

• >50,000 cubic Mpc

• >1500 galaxies

• baryonic mass limit ~109 Msun

• 1” = 0.3-0.5 kpc

• volume-limited design enables robust metrics of environment

• new 21cm data & 3D optical spectroscopy + superior reprocessed photometry

two equatorial stripscz=4500-7000 km/s525 sq deg A-sem187.5 sq deg B-sem

http://resolve.astro.unc.edu

REsolved Spectroscopy Of a Local VolumE

Page 3: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

ECO

RESOLVE-A

RESOLVE-B

RESOLVE-B:

Stripe 82: extra deep; hyper-complete – czcampaign for galaxies lost by SDSS (dwarfs, pairs, shredded spirals)

Find empirical completeness corrections larger than predicted by Blanton et al. (Eckert+ 2015b).

ECO: “Environmental COntextcatalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt; Moffett+ 2015)

Contains RESOLVE-A; enables calibration of cosmic variance.

More complete than SDSS.

Cosmic Variance and Completeness

original SDSS limit

Page 4: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

Why go down to 109 Msun across environments?

baryonic physics should change at key halo/galaxy mass scales

“cold” accretion shuts down from the inside out over a range in halo mass (e.g., Dekel & Birnboim 2005)

threshold~1011.4 Msun

bimodality~1012.1 Msun

shutdown~1013.3 Msun

Rvir

0.1Rvir

Rvir

0.1Rvir

Eck

ert e

t al. 2

01

5blog group halo mass from abundance matching

log g

ala

xy m

ass

(st

ella

r or

ba

ryon

ic)

halo mass scales translate to (central) galaxy mass scales

Page 5: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

Rvir

0.1Rvir

Rvir

0.1Rvir

Why go down to 109 Msun across environments?

baryonic physics should change at key halo/galaxy mass scales

These scales are associated with missing baryons, galaxy SF/gas/metallicity transitions (Dalcanton, Kannappan), deficits

in the dwarf inventory (e.g. “too big to fail” in the field;

Papastergis+ 2015), and also group formation.

structure halo mass

thre

shold

sca

le

galaxies groups

Vobs

McG

augh+

2010in

tegra

ted s

truct

ure

bary

onic

mass

threshold~1011.4 Msun

bimodality~1012.1 Msun

shutdown~1013.3 Msun

Page 6: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

Key scales imprinted on RESOLVE HI census(>95% complete, Stark+ in prep)

gas-r

ichn

ess

th

resh

old

bim

od

alit

y

shu

tdow

n

update

of

Kannap

pan

+ 2

013

crucial survey design features:• complete to well below key gas content transition scales• HI data fractional-mass limited (5-10% Mstellar upper limits)

incom

ple

te

≡ stellar + HI gas

Page 7: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

Improvements (not standard!):

• Blanton sky subtraction

• gri coadds define ellipses

• color gradients allowed

• flux extrapolation 3 ways

brighter, bluer, larger galaxies with more real scatter in color

(SFH implications: see Kannappan+ 2013 & poster)

Eckert+ 2015a

(Exciting!) reprocessed photometry(Eckert+ 2015a for RESOLVE; Moffett+ 2015 for ECO)

Page 8: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

cz’s: SOAR, SALT, WIRO (redshifts)

broad: SOAR (stellar pops, obs. planning, 310-710nm)

blue: SOAR/Gemini/AAT (stellar kinematics, s~27km/s)

red: SOAR/Gemini/SALT/AAT (gas kinematics, d~5km/s)

SOAR image slicer SALT Fabry-Perot & longslit

RESOLVE’s 3D Optical Spectroscopy Census(dynamics, metallicity, star formation history, AGN…)

Gemini GMOS-IFU

more info: Eckert, Snyder talks & poster

Page 9: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

Summary

Key advantages of RESOLVE & ECO:

Mbary limit ~109 Msun below key gas transition scales

volume-limited for diverse & robust environment data

more complete than parent SDSS

superior photometry (accurate colors & SFHs)

Additional benefits of RESOLVE:

fractional-mass limited HI census (5-10% Mstars)

3D optical spectroscopy in kinematic & broad setups

superior depth and archival data in equatorial strips

Page 10: RESOLVE & ECO: Survey Designresolve.astro.unc.edu/pdf/aas2016kannappantalk.pdf · ECO: “Environmental COntext catalog” (~10x larger, all same pipelines for stellar mass, envt;

And there’s more!

Poster Session #333:* Exploring the Origin of HI Profile Asymmetries in the RESOLVE Survey D. Stark* Probing Cosmic Gas Accretion with RESOLVE and ECO S. Kannappan* Detailed Analysis of Starburst and AGN Activity in Blue E/S0 Galaxies in RESOLVE A. Bittner* Status of the Dynamical Census of Galaxies and Groups in the RESOLVE Survey K. Eckert * Simulating cE Galaxy Formation by Tidal Stripping for Comparison to RESOLVE C. Ray

5:30-6:30 demos of online database @ poster session