Resizing of real labour force in rural areas in the context of occupational mobility - Romanian case...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Resizing of real labour force in rural areas in the context of occupational mobility - Romanian case...
Resizing of real labour force Resizing of real labour force
in rural areas in the context in rural areas in the context of occupational mobility of occupational mobility
-- Romanian case studyRomanian case study - -Monica Mihaela TUDOR
Institute of Agricultural Economics, Bucharest, ROMANIA
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Argument
The size and characteristics of the labour force in rural areas are conditioned, besides other
factors, by the phenomenon of temporary occupational migration. The occupational
migration of the population with the domicile in the Romanian rural area has many and deep
economic and social implications
This phenomenon extracts a significant part of population from the rural labour market which,
potentially, could offer their labour force.
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Size of emigration phenomenon
• At present, 2.5 million - 2.7 million Romanians are on the territory of other EU Member States (OECD Report on World Migration, 2010)
• ≈ 50% of the Romanians who migrate for work
come from the rural areas (according to the estimations of the Applied Economy Group - Romania)
• About 4.5 million active people have the domicile in the rural area
↓↓↓↓OverOver 1 / 3 of the 1 / 3 of the active populationactive population form Romaninan rural form Romaninan rural
area area is working abroadis working abroad
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Temporary out - migration for job, by county (2002)
Source: D. Sandu, Tipologia culturala a satelor Romaniei, 06.09.2007
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Main lines of the presentation
Defining the concept “Real disposable labour force”(DALFI)
Results of testing this concept in 4 pilot rural communities
- based on field surveys in four pilot rural communities from Romania, representative for the four typologies of circulatory migration to foreign countries (according to the classification proposed by Dumitru Sandu):
- with maximum circulatory migration experience (+ 30 ‰ were involved in circulatory out-migration for job)
- with medium circulatory migration experience (20-30 ‰)
- with incipient circulatory migration experience (10-20 ‰)
- with no circulatory migration experience (under 10 ‰)
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Defining the concept of “Real disposable labour force”
(DALFI) -1-
ACTIVE POPULATION from the economic point of view (according to LFS) includes all active persons whose usual
place of residence is in a certain territory, who supply labour for the production of goods and services during the reference
period, regardless if they are working away for less than 6 months
BUT not all the active persons at a certain territory (according to LFS definition) are effectively available to respond to the labour
force demand from the local/regional economic operators, as part of the active population is working:
-on daily, weekly commuting basis in other locality from the country
- on the basis of contractual arrangements shorter than 6 months in a foreign country
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Defining the concept of “Real disposable labour force”
(DALFI) - 2 -
...... so......
The persons of working age, resident in Romania, but The persons of working age, resident in Romania, but who left to foreign countries for less than 6 months, are who left to foreign countries for less than 6 months, are registered in the active population category in Romaniaregistered in the active population category in Romania
The persons of working age, resident in the (rural) The persons of working age, resident in the (rural) locality X, are considered as locality X, are considered as local labour forcelocal labour force even even
though they carry out their activity in other (urban or though they carry out their activity in other (urban or rural) localityrural) locality
That is why, by DALFI we intend to propose a new That is why, by DALFI we intend to propose a new statistical methodology and indicator that estimates the statistical methodology and indicator that estimates the
real disposable labour forcereal disposable labour force, , that force which is available for entrepreneurs and their that force which is available for entrepreneurs and their
plansplans in a in a certaincertain territory territory
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Defining the concept of “Real disposable labour force”
(DALFI) -3-Labour Force Survey definition
ACTIVE POPULATIONACTIVE POPULATION from the economic point of view includes
all active persons whose usual place of residence is in a certain territory, who supply labour for
the production of goods and services during the reference
period (week), regardless if they regardless if they areare working away for less than 6 working away for less than 6
monthsmonths
ACTIVE POPULATION (ACTIVE POPULATION (LFS)LFS) = Employed population + The Unemployed ILO
DALFI definition
REAL ACTIVE POPULATIONREAL ACTIVE POPULATION from the economic point of view includes all active persons whose usual place of residence is in a certain territory, who
supply labour for the production of goods and services during the reference period (week) and and non-resident active non-resident active population who supply labour in the population who supply labour in the
certain territorycertain territory in the reference in the reference weekweek for less than 6 months for less than 6 months
REAL ACTIVE POPULATION (DALFI)REAL ACTIVE POPULATION (DALFI) = ACTIVE POPULATION (ACTIVE POPULATION (LFS)LFS) -– – active resident population who active resident population who supply labour in other territory supply labour in other territory (commune, town or abroad) in the (commune, town or abroad) in the reference weekreference week ++ non-resident active population + non-resident active population who supply labour in the certainwho supply labour in the certain territory, territory, in the reference week in the reference week
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Field survey areasMap of temporary out - migration for job, by county, 2002
Source: D. Sandu, Tipologia culturala a satelor Romaniei, 06.09.2007
maximum circulatory migration experience
medium circulatory migration experience
no circulatory migration experience
incipient circulatory migration experience
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Who left, who remained in the village ?Structure by ages of the population from sample by the place of activity
related to place of residence, in the reference week
Results of the field surveys“Real disposable labour force” (DALFI)
0
10
20
30
40
50
6070
80
90
100
%
in thecommune
in othercommune
in town in othercountry
Total
>65 years
45-65 years
30-44 years
15-29 years
<15 years
Source: Capacities Project – DALFI 2008/2010, coordinator IEA (field surveys in 4 representative communes from the point of view of the intensity of the experience in migration abroad – September 2009)
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Results of the field surveys“Real disposable labour force” (DALFI)
Who left, who remained in the village ?Educational structure of the population from sample by the place of activity
related to place of residence, in the reference week
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% in
to
tal p
op
.
in thecommune
in othercommune
in town in othercountry
Total
higher education
post highscholl or technical foremeneducation
highschool (9-12 grades)
vocational, complementary orapprenticeship education (9-10 grades)
secondary school (5-8 grades)
primary school (1-4 grades)
no schooling
Source: Capacities Project – DALFI 2008/2010, coordinator IEA (field surveys in 4 representative communes from the point of view of the intensity of the experience in migration abroad – September 2009)
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Results of the field surveys“Real disposable labour force” (DALFI)
Who left, who remained in the village ?Structure of the population from sample by the participation to the
economic activity and by the place of activity related to place of residence, in the reference week
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% in
tota
l pop
.
in thecommune
in othercommune
in town in othercountry
Total
non-economicallyactive persons
economically activepersons
Source: Capacities Project – DALFI 2008/2010, coordinator IEA (field surveys in 4 representative communes from the point of view of the intensity of the experience in migration abroad – September 2009)
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Structure of the economically active population by the place of activity, in the referene week
Results of field surveys“Real disposable labour force” (DALFI)
Economically active population with the domicile in the households included in sample, out of which: 100.0 100.0 100.
- % of active persons permanently present in the commune 37.7 37.7 37.7
- % of persons working in another commune 4.0 4.0 -
- % of persons working in another town 26.4 26.4 -
- % of persons working in a foreign country under occupational arrangements shorter than 6 months 4.6 4.6 -
- % of persons working in a foreign country under occupational arrangements longer than 6 months 27.3 - -
Economically active population with the domicile in the households included in sample, out of which 100
Total active population according to LFS definitions 72.7
REAL ACTIVE POPULATION (DALFI)REAL ACTIVE POPULATION (DALFI) at commune level 37.7
Source: Capacities Project – DALFI 2008/2010, coordinator IEA (field surveys in 4 representative communes from the point of view of the intensity of the experience in migration abroad – September 2009)
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Results of the field surveys“Real disposable labour force” (DALFI)
Structure of the economically active population by the place of activity related to place of residence
0
20
40
60
80
100
% in
active
po
p.
in thecommune
in othercommune
in town in othercountry
Total
other active persons
unemployed
underground worker
farmer
self-employed in non-agricultural activitiesemployer
employee
Source: Capacities Project – DALFI 2008/2010, coordinator IEA (field surveys in 4 representative communes from the point of view of the intensity of the experience in migration abroad – September 2009)
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Results of the field surveys“Real disposable labour force” (DALFI)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
% in
em
plo
ym
en
t
in the commune in othercommune
in town in other country
health and social assistance
education
public administration
real estate
financial intermediations
transport and storage
hotels and restaurants
trade
construction
industry
sylviculture and hunting
agriculture
Employed population structure from samples of the pilot communes by the place of activity, in the reference week
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Total
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
ConclusionsInfluences (quantitative and qualitative) on
real disposable labour force
- Generally, the younger population of working age (15 – 44 years) opt for the occupational migration solution
- The largest part of the rural population included in the circulatory migration flows for work has better education
and qualification
•The detailed study of the characteristics and size of the real available labour force in rural
areas (and not only …)
•The need for the scientific substantiation of the statistical measurement methodology of the real
disposable labour force
20-21st October 2011, Dijon
Monica Mihaela Tudor Monica Mihaela Tudor Romanian Academy - Institute of Agricultural EconomicsRomanian Academy - Institute of Agricultural Economics
Macroeconomics Department, Calea 13 Septembrie 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, RomaniaMacroeconomics Department, Calea 13 Septembrie 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania