REDD+ သင်ခန်းစာ REDD+ ဆိင်ရာ ဂျာနယ်များကိ … · ဖိရန်အတွ့ က် redd+ အား ကာဗွန်ထတ်လင့်မäလျာ့နည်းမ၊
Redd Team Design Project Review
description
Transcript of Redd Team Design Project Review
![Page 1: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Redd TeamDesign Project Review
Cailin Penberthy, Nora Sedgwick, Parker Burton, Ruth Reeber, Ujjwal Shrestha
![Page 2: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
NeedsResearch salmon habitat to gain
an understanding of specifications
Optimize incubator design (streamside and collapsible in-stream)
![Page 3: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Needs (Cont.)Create a model to test the designIncorporate project learning into
designIncrease egg survival rate
![Page 4: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Project Learning: ResearchInterviewsExisting incubatorsGeneral research: biological
needs of salmon and troutMaterials
![Page 5: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Project Learning: ProcessResearch salmon and
obtain requirements from client
Visit with Scott (Cold Water Research
Laboratory)
Create multiple models
Simulate models in SolidWorks
Build and test best design
![Page 6: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SpecificationsTemperature 37.4 to 48.2 °FDissolved Oxygen 8ppm or higherTurbidity Less than 200 NTUpH 7 to 8Velocity Range 0.2 to 0.79 ft/sDepth 0.5 to 0.9 ftTurbulence Less than 4 ft-lb/ft3/sEnvironmental Concerns No material leaching or contaminationUse Duration
Streamside: year-long usageIn-stream: April to November
Life of Product 2+ years
MobilityStreamside: minimum weight, handles for carryingIn-stream: transportable in small plane
Visibility Camouflaged to reduce human interference and preserve natural beauty
![Page 7: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ConstraintsEasy to reconstruct (high school
students)Minimal cost and high qualityDesign/build scheduleUsable for both stream water and
river water usage
![Page 8: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Deliverables2 models2 streamside units2 collapsible in-stream units
![Page 9: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Design OptionsMain variable: internal divider
arrangement◦Single channel vs. dual-channel◦Straight vs. slanted◦Short vs. long dividers
Comparison using SolidWorks FlowXpress◦10 cubic inches per second◦Same divider height, thickness◦Same base part
![Page 10: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Long dividers
Mid-length dividers
Short dividers
Mix of short and long dividers
Two-channel: straight
Two-channel: slanted
Single-channel: slanted
Flow Model Comparison
![Page 11: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Best TwoLong dividers Mixed-length dividers
Pros• Fairly uniform velocity• Similar to existing design
(known to work)Cons• Little room for fish to
congregate• Flow has little variation
Pros• Regions of varied flow• Consistent flow in lower
region
Cons• Stagnation regions may
impede oxygenation, collect debris
![Page 12: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Combined Design
Advantages• Long dividers provide consistent flow through WV boxes• Short divider creates a space for fish to congregate before
exiting• Stagnation area is downstream of WV boxes: oxygenation less
of a problem
Selected Design
![Page 13: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Combined Design
Potential problems• Stagnation area may collect debris and sediment• Flow may be too uniform in beginning section: may not
simulate stream well
Selected Design (Cont.)
![Page 14: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Selected Design (cont.)
Placement of 24 Whitlock-Vibert boxes
![Page 15: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Model TestingInitial testing on the model showed even at the pump’s
maximum flow rate and added gravitational head the model was not able to achieve the desired velocity within the model. Added gravitational head was one foot. A larger pump is needed, once the target velocity .2 ft/s is achieved dissolved oxygen, filter ability, and basic durability testing will commence. Pump
ConditionVelocity
(ft/s)½ Rate .01
Full .01½ Rate
with Added Head
.03
Full with Added Head
.05
![Page 16: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Project CostsStream-side Model
Prices estimated from materials purchased for the models
Material Projected CostAcrylic Sheeting (23ft2) $76.59Silicon Caulking (x3 tubes) $18.87Filtration System $20.97U-Channel Wall Attachments $120.00PVC Couplings (x2) $5.00Whitlock-Vibert Boxes (x25) $93.75Refrigerator $0.00 (Donation – Howard
Hughes)Total $335.18
![Page 17: Redd Team Design Project Review](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56816216550346895dd243e4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Project ScheduleDate Work To Be CompletedDecember 3 Final Design CompletedJanuary 21 Build Selected DesignFebruary 25 Design Testing and ModificationsMarch 4 In-stream ModelApril 1 Project CompletionApril 8 Finish PresentationApril 15 Finish Poster and Polish PresentationApril 26 Design Expo