RECTAL CARCINOMA

38
1 RECTAL CARCINOMA RECTAL CARCINOMA ELSHAMI ELAMIN, MD Central Care Cancer Center Newton, KS-USA

description

RECTAL CARCINOMA. ELSHAMI ELAMIN, MD Central Care Cancer Center Newton, KS-USA. RISK FACTORS. Dietary factors Fat ? Fiber ? Calcium ? Vitamins (E, -carotene) Aspirin/NSAIDs (Cox inhibitors) Sulindac reduces polyps in FAP pts Aspirin lower risk of CRC. RISK FACTORS. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of RECTAL CARCINOMA

Page 1: RECTAL CARCINOMA

1

RECTAL CARCINOMARECTAL CARCINOMA

ELSHAMI ELAMIN, MD

Central Care Cancer Center

Newton, KS-USA

Page 2: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

2

RISK FACTORSRISK FACTORS

Dietary factors• Fat• ? Fiber• ? Calcium• ? Vitamins (E, -carotene)

Aspirin/NSAIDs (Cox inhibitors)• Sulindac reduces polyps in FAP pts• Aspirin lower risk of CRC

Page 3: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

3

RISK FACTORSRISK FACTORS

Genetic Factors– FAP(APC gene = Tumor suppressor gene)

• 1-2% of CRC• Invasive cancer occurs at ~ 42Y

– HNPCC (MMR mutations)• Hx of > 3 family members involving 2

generations with one diagnosed before age 50• 4-6% incidence• Rt-sided cancer• Caused by defective DNA mismatch repair genes

Page 4: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

4

Steps for Colorectal CarcinogenesisSteps for Colorectal Carcinogenesis

1- Mutation at MCC and APC genes

2- K-ras oncogene activates adenoma to carcinoma

3- Mutation of p53 tumor suppressor gene

Page 5: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

5

SCREENINGSCREENINGPatients with average risk

• Asymptomatic• >50Y• No colorectal risk factors

FOBT (33% reduction in mortality)Flexible sig (60-80% reduction in mortality)Double-contrast BEColonoscopy (Gold standard)

Page 6: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

6

Patients with increased RiskPatients with increased Risk

First-degree relative with CRC or adenomatous polyps

FAPF.H. of HNPCCAdenomatous polypsCRCIBD

Page 7: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

7

Hereditary CRC syndromesHereditary CRC syndromesScreening and ManagementScreening and Management

FAP– Genetic counseling/gene testing

• Is cost-effective

– Genetic mutation not identified:• Flex sig at puberty and annualy

• Colonoscopy if +ve sig

– +ve FAP• Total colectomy

Page 8: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

8

HNPCC (Lynch syndrome)HNPCC (Lynch syndrome)

Lynch I:– No associated cancers

Lynch II:– Associated with ovarian, uterine cancers

Genetic testing– Difficult due to multiple mutations

• MLH1, MSH2 mutations

Screening begin at 20Y and every 1-2YGenetically +ve: Consider colectomy/TAH/BSO

Page 9: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

9

Work-upWork-upLaboratory:

– LFTs– CBC, Iron profile– CEA

Preoperative CT scan– Colon cancer: Adjacent organ invasion/Liver met– Rectal: Adjacent organ invasion/LN spread

• For preop RT

Page 10: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

10

MRIMRI

Bowel wall penetration– MRI: 64%, CT: 62%

Sensitivity for LN met: 15-40%Endorectal surface coil MRI for N1

– 72% specificity

Page 11: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

11

Transrectal USTransrectal US

Evaluation for preop cheop/RT• Only 83-88% specific in separating T-T2 from T3-T4

LN specificity• 28% for 5mm LN

• 62% for 7mm

Page 12: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

12

CEA scanCEA scan

Coupled with standard CT

• Can predict preop respectability

Page 13: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

13

PET ScanPET ScanStagingRestaging

– 91% sensitivity, ~ 100% specificity for pelvic disease (CT: 52%, 80%)

– 95% sensitivity for liver disease (CT 74%)

Page 14: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

14

StagingStagingDukes’ classification

– Based on depth of invasion and LN• A: Limited to bowel wall

• B: Extrarectal tissues

• C: LN +

Modified Dukes’ (Astler-Coller system)– C1 and C2

Page 15: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

15

TNMTNMStage I: T1 (invade submucosa) A

T2 (invade muscul propria) B1Stage II: T3 (invade through musc propria B2

into subserosa or nonperit. Tissue)

T4 (perforate ves perit or B3 invade adjacent structure)

Stage III: N1 (1-3 pericolic/rectal) N2 (> 4) C

N3 (along vascular trunk)

Stage IV: M1

Page 16: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

16

Prognostic FactorsPrognostic FactorsAdjacent tissue or vascular invasionNodal status

• Micromets (<5mm) same as enlarged LN

• 4 LN vs >4

? Cellular pathologic factors• S-phase, ploidy

Liver mets• Normal LFTs: 18 month med S

• Elevated Bil: 6 wks med S

Page 17: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

17

Prognostic FactorsPrognostic FactorsCEA

• Weak prognostic factor

• Persistant CEA elevation = Residual dz

• May increase initially during adjuvant

Not prognostic factors• Age, Sex, Tumor size

Page 18: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

18

Rectal CaRectal CaSurgical TreatmentSurgical Treatment

Abdominal Perineal Resection (APR)• Permanent Colostomy

Sphincter Preservation

Page 19: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

19

APRAPRBased on:

• Rectal cancer spread via lymphatic pathways in proximal, lateral and distal direction

Decreases local recurrenceImprove survivalPermanent colostomy

Page 20: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

20

APRAPRCandidates

• Primary sphincter dysfunction

• Tumor invading anal canal

• High risk for local recurrence• Bulky disease

• Poorly differentiated involving lower 1/3

• Direct extension into adjacent organs

Page 21: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

21

Total Mesorectal Excision Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)(TME)

Tumor spread into adjacent mesorectum>2cm distal extension from the margin carries

poor prognosisDecreases local recurrenceImprove survivalStandard for mid and lower rectal cancersPreserves pelvic autonomic nerve function

Page 22: RECTAL CARCINOMA

22

Surgical Options for Surgical Options for Sphincter PreservationSphincter Preservation

Page 23: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

23

Local ExcisionLocal ExcisionLower 1/3 early rectal cancer (T1)< 4 cm in diameterMobile lesionInvolve < 1/4 of circumference of bowelModerate to well differentiated

• From 2 prospective Trials• T1 : Local excision alone

• T2 : Local excision + CT/RT

Page 24: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

24

Local Excision with RTLocal Excision with RTIndications

– T2– Lymphatic/vascular invasion– Poor histology– Positive margin– Fragmented resection

Page 25: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

25

Endocavitary RTEndocavitary RTSelection criteria

• Distal lesion

• No disease beyond bowel wall

• No major extension to anal canal

• T < 3x5 cm

Local failure• 5-20%

• Salvage radical surgery

Page 26: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

26

Low Anterior Resection Low Anterior Resection (LAR)(LAR)

1- Bowel divided at 5cm above rectal tumor

2- Ligation of superior hemorrhoidal artery

3- Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for mid/lower rectal tumors

4- 11/2 - 2cm distal margin

5- Colo-Rectal anastomosis

Page 27: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

27

Colonic J-PouchColonic J-Pouch

For low rectal cancer

To prevent incontinence/urgency

Page 28: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

28

APR vs Sphincter Sparing Resections APR vs Sphincter Sparing Resections (SSR) in Mid-rectal cancers(SSR) in Mid-rectal cancers

5 Y S %

APR SSR

Mayo et al 69 72

Patel et al 56 64

Jones/Thomson 52 67

Williams/Johnston 62 74

• Local recurrence: APR 8%, SSR 11% (not significant)

Page 29: RECTAL CARCINOMA

29

ADJUVANT THERAPYADJUVANT THERAPY

Page 30: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

30

Rectal CancerRectal CancerIncidence of local failure after resection

– T1, T2N0: <10%– T3N0: 15-30%– T3N1: 35-50%– T3-T4N1: 60%

• No successful salvage procedure

Page 31: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

31

Pre-Operative RTPre-Operative RTImproves local control (Several studies)

– Improves OS (Only one study)

Downside– Overtreatment of T1, T2

• Use Transrectal US

– Treatment of patient with hepatic mets• Use spiral CT

Page 32: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

32

Locally Advanced Rectal CancerLocally Advanced Rectal Cancer

PreOp external RT + IntraOp RT• 67%5Y local control, 57% DFS

PreOp RT or Chemo/RT• 70-85% resectability and sphincter sparing surgery

Page 33: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

33

Locally Recurrent DiseaseLocally Recurrent DiseaseTreatment options depend on

– Local extent• Isolated suture line recurrence after LAR

– APR + Chemo/RT if no prior RT

• Local recurrence without prior RT

– PreOp chemo/RT, Surgery + IORT

• Poor long-term DFS even with complete resection

– Symptoms– Distant mets– Prior adjuvant therapy

Page 34: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

34

CEACEA43-89% Sensitivity, 70-90% specificityPreOp elevation predicts worse prognosis

– Not useful in determining the need for adjuvant

Elevation correlates with Dukes’ stagePersistent 1-month postOp elevation predicts

metsMonitor CEA q2-3 moths during chemoModest elevation

• Fatty liver infiltration, hepatitis, pneumonia, GE

Page 35: RECTAL CARCINOMA

35

Systemic ChemotherapySystemic Chemotherapy

Page 36: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

36

5-FU5-FU 5 days IVP regimen:

• Mucositis, diarrhea, neutropenia

Wkly IVP regimen:• Diarrhea

CI regimen/Capecitabine:• Hand-foot syndrome, mucositis

• Diarrhea or neutropenia

High dose regimen 24-48hrs• Altered MS, angina-like chest pain

Page 37: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

Oxaliplatin = IrinotecanOxaliplatin = Irinotecan

FOLFOXFOLFIRIXELOXXELIRI

• AVASTIN/ZALTRAP• ERBITUX/VECTIBIX• REGORAFENIB

37

Page 38: RECTAL CARCINOMA

NextPrevious

38

Regional TherapyRegional Therapy(Liver Mets)(Liver Mets)

HAI of FUDR via an implanted pump• Addition of dexamthazone reduces sclerosing

cholangitis and enhances RR

Chemoembolization• 3mg/ml Adria + 3mg/ml MC + 10mg/ml CDDP with

bovine collagen

• Postembolization syndrome (fever, RtUQ pain, N/V, lethargy, hematologic toxicity)

Resection