rd SEAC Meeting Date: 07/10/2014 -...

Minutes of 193rd

SEAC Meeting Date: 07/10/2014

The 193rd

meeting of SEAC was held in Directorate of Environment, U.P. on

07/10/2014. Following members were present in the meeting along with Secretary,

SEAC:

1. Dr. M. S. Khan, Chairman

2. Dr. S. N. Singh, Member

3. Shri S. C. Brahmachari, Member

4. Dr. S.K. Upadhayay Member

5. Dr. D. C. Gupta, Member

6. Dr. R.K. Sardana, Secretary

The Chairman welcomed the members to the 193rd

SEAC meeting.

The minutes of 192nd

SEAC meeting dated 27/09/2014 were confirmed.

The Members of SEAC unanimously taken following decisions on the agenda points

discussed:

1- Application no- 108/2013 Mr. Sanjeev Gupta V/s State of UP and Others.

As per the direction of SEIAA meeting dated 02-09-2014.The Hon’ble NGT principal

bench, New Delhi order dated 20.8.14 regarding the matter was discussed in the meeting. The

SEAC discussed in detail and directed the project proponent to submit the history of the

matter along with the legal status of the lease of the proposed project wetted from mining

department. The matter will be considered after receipt of the information.

2- IT Building at Plot No-A-46, Sec.-62, Noida, UP. M/S HSL Software Pvt. Ltd., E-20

Lajpat Nagar-III, New Delhi. File No. 114/DD-Sh.

The committee noted that the application for environmental clearance on above

project was submitted to SEIAA on dated 08/05/2014. Project proponent through letter dated

Minutes of 193rd SEAC Meeting Date: 07/10/2014

of 48

11/08/2014 submitted that the project has been submitted for green building certification from Indian Green Building Council (IGBC). The matter was discussed in the committee

meeting dated 14-sept-2014 and committee directed the project proponent to submit following information/clarifications:

1. Copy of development authority's documents through which FAR has been allowed.

2. Compounding FAR cannot be taken for granted at inception stage itself. Revised area statement and commensurate proposals should be submitted excluding

compounding FAR. Clarification for inclusion of compounding FAR at inception

stage should be provided.

3. Specify the permitted uses of the proposed project site as per zoning of Noida

Master Plan.

4. Area statement with block wise, floor wise details should be submitted.

5. On scale map showing approach road with reference to project site.

6. Site layout plan with dimensions should be submitted. All road widths should be

clearly mentioned in the layout plan.

7. Structural design map along with certificate for structural safety.

8. All services maps i.e. sewage, drainage, external electrification, rain water

harvesting, parking, uses of solar energy etc. 9. Solar energy provisions for street lighting and stair case lighting should be made

and plans submitted. 10. The project proponent has proposed for zero discharge. It may be reviewed by the

proponent in light of discussions held in the meeting. Scenario for monsoon period should also be considered while proposing for zero discharge.

11. STP is proposed in basement. For basement, only modular STP shall be accepted. No civil construction in basement for STP shall be allowed.

12. Section drawing for roads showing all services i.e. footpath/parking/sewage/drainage.

13. Parking entry and exit have been proposed on same road. Provision for separate

entry/exit roads may be explored.

14. Plan for use of CSTP water for construction purposes and undertaking from the

proponent.

15. A CSR Plan with Rs. 2.5 crore should be prepared and details submitted.

16. Reflecting paints are to be used on top terrace and side walls.

17. No objection certificate from competent authority regarding

fire fighting.O.H.T.to be proposed with capacity of water as per NBC.

18. Provision of composting to be processed at site.

19. Affidavit regarding wild life sanctuary within 5 KM to be given.

20. Provision to be made for all facilities like convenient shops, play school, community Hall.

In the above context the project proponent submitted the reply/information vide

his letter dated 25-09-2014. A presentation was made by the Ms. Richa Singh, Project

proponent along with their consultant M/s ENV Developmental Assistance Systems

Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,

informed the committee that:-

1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for proposed IT Building Project “Proplarity

Bizlife” at Plot No-A-46, Sec.-62, Noida, UP. M/S HSL Software Pvt. Ltd.

2. Area details of the project is as follows:


of 48


of 48

1 Number of Trees Required (One tree per 100 m2

of

open space)

Number of Trees Provided

140

150

2 Parking Facilities Required: 1200 ECS

Provided: 1200 ECS

Basement (Level 1) : 423 ECS

Basement (Level 2) : 448 ECS Ground Floor: 242 ECS

Open Space: 84 ECS

3 Power Requirement and Source

Backup Power

5000 kVA, (Noida Power

Corporation Ltd) 1010 kVA x 5 DG sets

3. Water calculation details of the project is as follows:

S. No. Particulars Total Population Fresh

water

(KLD)

Recycling/

Flushing water

(KLD)

Total

Domestic

water

(KLD)

1. IT/ITES

@ 45 lpcd

15000

450

@ 30 lpcd

225

@ 15 lpcd

675

2. Service Staff

@ 45 lpcd

1000 30

@ 30 lpcd

15

@ 15 lpcd

45

Total Domestic Water Requirement 480 240 720

Horticulture @ 1L/sqm (7000.91 sq m) 7 7

DG cooling @ 0.9/kVA/no. of hrs (6 hrs) of

operation

27 27

HVAC (Capacity – 1900 TR, 9 litres per tonnage of

18 hrs of operation)

309 309

Total water requirement 480 583 1063

4. Water and waste water details of the project is as follows:

Fresh water 480 KLD

Flushing 240 KLD

Horticulture / Landscape 7 KLD

HVAC 309 KLD

DG set cooling 27 KLD

Total water requirement 1063 KLD

Waste water 648 KLD

Source of water - Municipal Water Supply/ Recycle of treated effluent

STP Capacity – 780 KLD (20 % extra for future expansion)

5. Solid waste generation details of the project is as follows:

S.No. Particulars Population Waste

generated

(kg/day)

1. IT/ITES Offices (@ 0.2 kg/day) 15,000 3000

2. Service Staff (@ 0.2 kg/day) 1000 200

Total Solid waste generated Approx. 3.2

Tonnes/day


of 48

Horticulture Waste (0.0037 kg/sq m/ day) 20 Kg/Day

E-Waste (0.15 kg/C/Yr) 6 Kg/Day

STP Sludge (20%of waste water) 120 Kg/Day

6. 05 nos. of rain water harvesting pits is proposed for the project.

7. The project proposals are covered under category 8”a” of EIA Notification, 2006.

The committee examined the documents as above and recommended grant of

environmental clearance for the proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the

Authority (Annxure-1) for the construction projects and following specific conditions:

1. Before starting the construction, the Byelaws of concerned authority shall be submitted

to SEIAA.

2. Before starting the construction the plans should be approved by the competent

authority.

3. Permission from the competent authority to drain out waste water to municipal drain

shall be submitted.

4. Undertaking shall be provided for installing modular STP along with details.

5. Installing online water quality monitoring devices with recycled water line along with

flow measuring device.

6. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from

National Board for Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not earmarked

7. Adequate green cover not less than 33% of the plotted area should be provided within

the premises. 8. STP to be installed and treated water should be used for construction phase.

9. STP drawing design and cost estimate has to be submitted within 03 months from issuance of the Environmental Clearance.

10. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be

treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for

designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization

11. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to

be used in house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving to end users.

12. SWM organic converter drawing, design and cost estimate has to be submitted within 03 months from issuance of the Environmental Clearance

13. Approved Lay out plan from authority to be submitted within 03 months from issuance of the Environmental Clearance.

14. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of total project profit shall be submitted (within the month) on need base

assessment study in the study area. Income generating measures which can help in

upliftment of weaker section of society consistent with the traditional skills of the

people identified. The programme can include activities such as old age homes, rain

water harvesting provisions in nearby areas, development of fodder farm, fruit bearing

orchards, vocational training etc. In addition, vocational training for individuals shall be

imparted so that poor section of society can take up self-employment and jobs. Separate

budget for community development activities and income generating programmers shall

be specified.

15. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided.


of 48

16. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. Solar light is to be provided in the open areas with 50% of them may be with dual power.

17. Parking guideline as per Noida authority should be followed. 18. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

19. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system permission from the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

20. All internal roads should not be less than 9 m wide. 21. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done

only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after

permission from CGWB.

22. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets

capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building.

23. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP

to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

24. Wheel wash arrangement is to be made at exit point during construction phase.

25. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.

26. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities.

27. Parking for disabled persons should be explored.

28. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of residents.

29. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be followed for construction work.

30. Dual plumbing should be adopted. 31. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be

restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent authority.

32. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.

33. Guidelines of NHAI to be followed.

34. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In

case of default the Environmental Clearance will deem to be cancelled.

35. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for

construction.

36. Cement Bags should be used for road making.

37. LIG & EWS housing to be provided as per G.B. Nagar byelaws/letter of land

allotment.

38. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.

39. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose. Fresh Water will only used for

drinking, bathing and in swimming pool. 40. Any litigation pending in the Courts of Law it shall be binding on project proponent.

41. Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under Section 11 of the

National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997. 42. All Structural design is to be submitted duly signed by competent and qualified

structural engineer.


of 48

3- Gautam Budha Technical University at Sector-11, Jankipuram Extension Yojna,

Sitapur Road,Lucknow. File No. 1028/AD(H)


project was submitted to SEIAA on dated 01-08-2011. The matter was considered in SEAC meeting dated 19-10-2011 and committee directed the project proponent to submit following

information/clarifications. a) Plan for Crèche during the operation phase.

b) Details of Stack height calculated for combined DG set capacity and higher than the

tallest building in the premises.

c) Details of Green belt area to be covered with 50% trees, 25% shrubs and 25% grass

planted on 3 rose on the periphery where at least 50% of tree should be every green.

d) Details of provision for using CFLs, LEDs and Solar light in the common area.

e) Plan for treatment of 100% waste water.

f) Revised water balance detecting the details of requirement of day scholars etc.

g) Details of STP and management of excess waste water, sludge and chemical waste of

laboratory be separately treated before sending it to STP for further treatment.

h) Solid waste management should be planed.

i) Exclusive area for bus.

j) Provision for 2 wheeler.

The matter was again put up in SEAC meeting dated 31-01-2012 and project

proponent did not appear in the meeting. The project proponent vide letter no-

889/SEAC/1028/2011/AD(H) dated 27-04-2012 was informed by the directorate that the

matter is here by closed till the request is received a from project proponent for consideration of the matter. After nearly 03 year the project proponent has submitted the reply regarding the

information asked by the SEAC meeting dated 19-10-2011 through his letters no

UPTU/RO/construction /2014/10232-33 dated 09-10-2014.

The matter was considered in SEAC meeting dated 07-10-2014 and a presentation

was made by the Mr. D.S. Yadav, Pro Vice chancller, UPTU, representative of the

Project proponent along with their consultant M/s Sawen consultancy services Pvt.

Ltd, Lucknow. During the presentation the project proponent informed the SEAC that

construction work up to 25% regarding the project has already been undertaken

without seeking prior environmental clearance. In view of this, the committee directed

that the project proponent should be directed to submit compliance to O.M. dated

12/12/2012 regarding violation of E.P. Act for construction without obtaining prior

environmental clearance. The committee also directed to Secretary, SEAC that a

communication should be made to State Govt. for providing permission regarding

initiation of legal action for violation of E.P. Act in the matter against the project

proponent. The committee also directed the project proponents to communicate

information as above to all committee members along with copy of compliance to

MoEF OM dated 12/12/2012. The project proponent should also provide the names

and address of the Members of Board of Directors including Chairman. The SEAC

directed to the project proponent to submit following information regarding the

matter-


of 48

1. Copy of development authority's documents.

2. Specify the permitted uses of the proposed project site as per zoning of Lucknow Master Plan.

3. Area statement with block wise, floor wise details. 4. On scale map showing approach road with reference to project site.

5. Site layout plan with dimensions. All road widths , clearly mentioned in the layout plan.



harvesting, parking, uses of solar energy etc.

8. Solar energy provisions for street lighting and stair case lighting should be made

and plans submitted.

9. The project proponent has proposed for zero discharge. Scenario for monsoon

period should also be considered while proposing for zero discharge.

10. STP is proposed in basement. For basement, only modular STP shall be accepted.

No civil construction in basement for STP shall be allowed.

11. Section drawing for roads showing all services i.e.

footpath/parking/sewage/drainage. 12. A CSR Plan should be prepared and details submitted.

13. Revised Stack Height. 14. Justification regarding the Delay of submission of reply.

15. Reference regarding the change of name of university as UPTU from GBTU. 16. Parking plan is to be submitted as per building bye laws.

The SEAC also directed the team of SEAC member to inspect the site of the

proposed project regarding the status of construction and submit the report to SEAC.

4- Proposed Group Housing Project at Plot No- 1005 to 1006, Vill-Noor Nagarar,

Ghaziabad, U.P. Sri. N Datta, A-96, IInd Floor, Vivek Vihar, Phase-I, Delhi File No.

1660/DD(Y)

The project proponent did not appear in the meeting. The Secretariat informed the

committee noted that the project was earlier put up in SEAC meeting dated 31-08-2013 and

the project did not appear. In the light of above the SEAC is of the opinion that it seems that

the project proponent is not interested in perusing his case regarding the prior Environmental

Clearance. Therefore, the SEAC directed that the project is to be closed and delisted and

directed the project proponent to submit fresh application if desired so.

5- Group Housing project “Raj Garden City” Vill- Noornagar, Ghazibad. Sri Deepak

Rawat, 3/114 , Sector- 5, Rajendra nagar, Sahibabad, Ghizabad, U.P. File No.

1716/DD(Y)

The committee noted that the application for environmental clearance on above project was submitted to SEIAA on dated 27-07-2013. The matter was considered in SEAC

meeting dated 30-09-2013 and in the SEAC meeting dated 06-06-2014 committee directed the project proponent to submit following information/clarifications.

1. Approved plan for building, structural design, proposed services, drainage and greens.


of 48

2. Details of STP and rain water harvesting. 3. Water requirement for fire fighting and its management should be specifically

mentioned. 4. Provision should be made for the additional water supply through tube wells and

permission should be sought from the competent authority. 5. Provisions for use of solar energy.

6. Proposals for ultimate disposal of waste water along with necessary undertakings by competent authorities.

7. Complete area details i.e. plot area, built up area, area for various services, green

area, floor wise area (also as percentage of total area).

8. Certificate of structural safety for proposed project from competent Authority.

9. Details of proposed block wise construction.

10. Clarification regarding location of the project in District-Ghaziabad in view of

MoEF OM dated 13/01/2010 regarding consideration of projects for

environmental clearance based on comprehensive environmental pollution index.

11. Proposed provision for mandatory LIG and EWS housing.

In the above context the project proponent submitted the reply/information vide his

undated letter received on directorate on dated 21-08-2014. Which was put up in SEAC meeting dated 07-10-2014. A presentation was made by the Mr. Mahesh Kumar,the

representative of the Project proponent along with their consultant M/s Shri Environmental Technology Institute. The SEAC gone through the reply submitted by the project proponent.

The SEAC found the reply incomplete, therefore, directed the project proponent to submit the additional following information regarding the matter-

1. Document regarding Ownership of land & change of land use.

2. Copy of development authority's documents through which FAR has been allowed. 3. Specify the permitted uses of the proposed project site as per zoning of Noida Master

Plan.






8. All services maps i.e. sewage, drainage, external electrification, rain water harvesting,

parking, uses of solar energy etc.

9. Solar energy provisions for street lighting and stair case lighting should be made and

plans submitted.

10. Plan for zero discharge. Scenario for monsoon period should also be considered while proposing for zero discharge.

11. Detailed plan for STP. 12. Section drawing for roads showing all services i.e. footpath/parking/sewage/drainage.

13. Parking entry and exit have been proposed on same road. Provision for separate entry/exit roads may be explored.

14. Detailed plan for CSR. 15. Affidavit regarding wild life sanctuary within 5 KM to be given.

16. Provision for facilities like convenient shops, play school, community Hall etc.

The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.


of 48

6- Group Housing project “ Blue moon Homesat plot no- 1104, 1111, Vill-Noornagar,

Ghaziabad. File No. 1717/AD(H)


project was submitted to SEIAA on dated 30-07-2013. The matter was considered in SEAC meeting dated 30-09-2013 and in the SEAC meeting dated 06-06-2014 committee directed

the project proponent to submit following information/clarifications. 1. Approved plan for building, structural design, proposed services, drainage for

internal and external development and greens.

2. Details of STP and rain water harvesting.

3. Water requirement for fire fighting and its management should be specifically

mentioned.

4. Provisions for use of solar energy.

5. Report regarding water table is required from the competent authority.

6. Parking plan is to be submitted showing circulation pattern for in and out on map.

7. Proposals for ultimate disposal of waste water along with necessary undertakings

by competent authorities.

8. Complete area details i.e. plot area, built up area, area for various services, green

area, floor wise area (also as percentage of total area). 9. Certificate of structural safety for proposed project from competent Authority.

10. Details of proposed block wise construction. 11. Clarification regarding location of the project in District-Ghaziabad in view of

MoEF OM dated 13/01/2010 regarding consideration of projects for environmental clearance based on comprehensive environmental pollution index.

12. Proposed provision for mandatory LIG and EWS housing.

In the above context the project proponent submitted the reply/information vide his undated letter received on directorate on dated 28-08-2014. Which was put up in

SEAC meeting dated 07-10-2014. A presentation was made by the Mr. Mahesh

Kumar,the representative of the Project proponent along with their consultant M/s

Shri Environmental Technology Institute. The SEAC gone through the reply

submitted by the project proponent. The SEAC found the reply incomplete, therefore,

directed the project proponent to submit the additional following information

regarding the matter-


2. Copy of development authority's documents through which FAR has been

allowed.

3. Specify the permitted uses of the proposed project site as per zoning of Noida Master Plan.

4. Area statement with block wise, floor wise details should be submitted. 5. On scale map showing approach road with reference to project site.

6. Site layout plan with dimensions should be submitted. All road widths should be clearly mentioned in the layout plan.

7. Structural design map along with certificate for structural safety. 8. All services maps i.e. sewage, drainage, external electrification, rain water

harvesting, parking, uses of solar energy etc. 9. Solar energy provisions for street lighting and stair case lighting should be made

and plans submitted.


of 48

10. Plan for zero discharge. Scenario for monsoon period should also be considered while proposing for zero discharge.

11. Detailed plan for STP. 12. Section drawing for roads showing all services i.e.

footpath/parking/sewage/drainage. 13. Parking entry and exit have been proposed on same road. Provision for separate

entry/exit roads may be explored. 14. Detailed plan for CSR.

15. Affidavit regarding wild life sanctuary within 5 KM to be given.



7- Proposed IT Park at Plot No-19, Sector-KPV, Greater Noida. Sri Rajesh Gupta,

Director, 21, Ring Road, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delhi, U.P. File No. 1925/OSD(T)

The project proponent did not appear in the meeting. The Secretariat informed

the committee noted that the project was earlier put up in SEAC meeting dated 08-10-

2013 and the project did not appear. In the light of above the SEAC is of the opinion

that it seems that the project proponent is not interested in perusing his case regarding

the prior Environmental Clearance. Therefore, the SEAC directed that the project is to

be closed and delisted and directed the project proponent to submit fresh application if

desired so.

8- “Everest Enclave” at Sector-18, Vrindavan Road Yojna No- 04, Lucknow. M/s Avas

Vikas Parishad, CD-13, Niligiri Complex, Indiara Nagar, LKO. File No. 2171/AD(H)

The committee noted that the application for environmental clearance on above project was submitted to SEIAA through letter no- 252/Y.20/24 dated 14-02-2014. The

matter was considered in SEAC meeting dated 05-08-2014 committee directed the project

proponent to submit following information/clarifications.

1. Green area should be increased upto 15% of the total plot area. Layout plan in this

regard should be submitted.

2. As discussed in meeting, convenient shopping shall be provided in place of

shopping mall. Necessary documents should be submitted.

3. Project map approved by competent authorities should be submitted.

4. One basement parking plan should be submitted.

5. Certificate of structural stability approved by structural engineer.

6. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard

electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan should be submitted.

7. Rain water harvesting plan only through roof top should be submitted and should

not be mixed with storm water.

8. Plan for 100% solar energy use in open areas should be submitted.

9. Provision for firefighting shall be made and submitted.

10. Quantity of soil excavation and its management plan should be submitted.

11. Wind rose diagram especially in view of proximity with PGI should be submitted.


of 48


his letter no- 1542/Y.20/101 dated 09-09-2014. Which was put up in SEAC meeting

dated 07-10-2014. A presentation was made by the project proponent Shri V.B. Singh,

Executive Engineer, Construction Division-13, U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad,

Lucknow along with their consultant M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. The

project proponent informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group housing project “Everest Enclave”

at Sector-18, Vrindavan Road Yojna No- 04, Lucknow, U.P. M/s Awas Vikas

Parishad.

2. Salient features of the project are as follows:

Total plot area : 35256.42 sqm

Built-up area : 99674.17 sqm

a) Residential Ground Coverage : 5051.70 sq.m

b) Facilities Ground Coverage : 1350.08 sq.m.

Total Green Area : 3835.02 sq.m (11.00 %)

Total Road Area : 16371.62 sq.m.

Total Paved Area : 8648.00 sq.m.

Total Achieved Ground Coverage : 8128.27 sq.m.(23.05%)

Achieved FAR : 2.73

No. of Floors : S+13

Height of Building : 47.0 m for S+13

No. of Towers : 09 Towers

No. of Flats : 482 Flats

Types of Flats : 3 BHK +S & 4 BHK+S

Stand By Power Supply (D.G. Sets) : 250 KVA × 09 nos.

Transformer : 630 KVA x 09 nos.

Total Expected Population : 2960 personnel’s

Source of Water Supply : 1 no. of bore well (150 mm dia).

Total Consumption of Water : 235.92 KLD

Waste Water Treatment Capacity : 200 KLD STP based on FAB Tech.

Total MSW Generation : 1607.58 Kg/day

Parking Provision : 1463 ECS (Open/ Stilt/ Basement)

Total no. of rainwater harvesting pits: 04 Nos.

Total Dwelling Units : 482 nos.

Electric Load : 4075.00 KW for 4 BHK + S

& 4570.0 KW for 3 BHK + S

S. No. Activities Area (m2

)

1 3 BHK Towers 2367.36

2 4 BHK Towers 2648.34

3 Deck Area (3BHK+S) with Community Center 907.93

4 Deck Area (4BHK+S) with Swimming pool & Indoor Games 815.73


of 48

5 Guard Room 50

6 Shopping Complex 67.57

7 OHT Tank 63.3

8 UGR with Pump Room 125.26

9 Ramp Area 494.9

Total Ground Coverage 8128.47

S. No. Land Uses Area (m2) Percentage (%)

1 Residential Area 5051.70 14.32

2 Facilities Area 1350.08 3.83

3 Green Area 3835.02 10.88

4 Parking Area 8648.0 24.53

5 Road Area 16371.62 46.44

Total Area of the Scheme 35256.42 100%

3. Water requirement of the project is as follows:

S.

No.

Location Population/ Area

(Sq.M.)

Per Capita

Water Demand

(LPCD)

Total Water

Requirement

(KLD)

1 Residential 2410 86 207.26

2 Visitors 500 15 7.50

3 Staff (Community Center, Shops, Guard, & Elect.

Substation,

Housekeeping etc)

50 45 2.25

Total Domestic Water Requirement 217.01 KLD

4 D.G. Set Cooling 250 KVA×09 nos.

+ 630 KVA x 09

nos.

0.9 l/KVA/ 2 hrs 5.07

5 Swimming Pool (make

up water) - Lump sum 10.00

6 Horticulture &

Landscaping

3835.02 sq,.m 1 l/ m2

3.83

Total Water Requirement 235.92 KLD

4. Waste water generation of the proposed project is as follows;

S. No. Waste Water Generation Waste Discharge (KLD) 1 Domestic 173.61 3 Swimming Pool (Water make up) NIL 4 D.G. Sets Cooling NIL 5 Gardening & Horticulture NIL

Total Waste Water Generation 173.61 KLD


of 48

5. The Project proposal falls under Category –8(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended).

The committee discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit the

following information:

1. Certificate regarding IIT Mumbai regarding structural stability.

2. Plan for reducing the number of proposed D.G. sets by increasing the capacity of

D.G sets.

3. Plan for solar energy system to be provided in common areas.

4. Plan for saving & storage of storm water & providing water pond.

5. Plan for readymade toilet.


7. Copy of development authority's documents through which FAR has been allowed.







12. Section drawing for roads showing all services i.e.

footpath/parking/sewage/drainage.


14. A earth base kutchha water body is to be proposed to construct at proposed site at

suitable location to collect rain water other than roof top for rain water harvesting

purpose.

15. Provision of 100% solar energy on all street light and at common places like stair

case.

16. Use of reflecting paints on top of the roof and side walls.


9- Residential Township Project “Curio-City” at Plot No-TS-2,Sector-22D, YEIDA,

Greater Noida, U.P.. File No. 2241/AD(Sub)


project was submitted to SEIAA through letter no- CCN/HPC/415 dated 31-03-2014. The

matter was considered in SEAC meeting dated 02-05-2014. In the meeting dated 02-05-2014

the committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 17/10/2012

wherein the terms of reference were issued regarding the project proposals. However, the

project proponent through their latte dated 31/03/2014 has reapplied the proposals for

environmental clearance as the plot area and built up area of the project have been changed.

Plot area has been reduced from 200 acres to 100 acres. The committee discussed the matter

and directed the proponents to submit following information:

1. Approved maps regarding the project.

2. Percentage of area statement w.r.t. complete area along with land use.


of 48

3. No. of Proposed MIG/HIG/Plot Sizes.

4. The proposals should be based on estimation of complete population.

5. Details of complete project and the part for which the present application has been

submitted

6. An action plan in detail keeping in mind the future expansion from the proponent

side.


his letter no- CCN/HPC/437 dated 20-06-2014. Which was put up in SEAC meeting dated

07-10-2014? The committee directed the project proponent to submit following

information/clarifications.

1. LIG & EWS housing to be provided as per U.P Govt. Orders and building bye

laws i.e. 10% for LIG and 10% for M I G.

2. As TOR approved for 100 hectares and now in revise project it has been redused

to 40 hectares. As such all the details are to be submitted on the basis of new project report of 40 hectares. Accordingly all the respective maps lay out plan is to

be re approved by the competent Authority. 3. Revised corrected statement of area is to be submitted along with % statements.

4. Detail plan of rain water harvesting with no of pits to be provided with its location is also to be submitted.

5. Commitment letter from Noida Development Authority that water supply sewer drainage will be allowed to be connected / provided from the Authority and no

objection to be issued will be submitted by the proponent.

6. 100% solar energy will be provided in all street light and common places like stair

cases.

7. Detailed proposal of Area statement with plotted development area, constructed

area along with block wise, floor wise details.

8. Plan regarding Solar energy provisions for street lighting and stair case lighting.

9. Detailed plan for STP.

10. Plan for Provision for facilities like convenient shops; play school, community

Hall, Police station, Post office etc.

11. On scale map showing all services i.e. sewage, drainage, external electrification,

rain water harvesting, parking, uses of solar energy etc in the same map.

12. On scale map showing approach road with reference to project site. Clearly

mentioning all road widths in layout plan. 13. Detailed plan for CSR.

14. Plan for collection of internal solid waste by pvt. agencies. 15. Copy of layout plan submitted to competent authority on which Environmental

Clearance is being proposed. 16. Provision for water body under land escaping.

10- Group Housing Project at Plot No-7D/GH-03, Awadh Vihar Yojna, Sultanpur Road,

Lucknow. File No. 2300/DD(D.S)


project was submitted to SEIAA on dated 02-05-2014. Project proponent through letter dated

11/08/2014 submitted that the project has been submitted for green building certification

from Indian Green Building Council (IGBC). The matter was discussed in the committee


of 48

meeting dated 14-sept-2014 and the committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit following information/clarifications:

1. Copy of ownership documents regarding the project. 2. Copy of development authority's documents through which FAR has been

allowed. 3. Specify the permitted uses of the proposed project site as per zoning of Lucknow

Master Plan. 4. Area statement with block wise, floor wise details should be submitted.

5. Copy of sanctioned plans/maps as approved by Lucknow Development Authority.




8. Lucknow Development Authority bye-laws for basement parking should be

submitted.

9. Landscape/green plan.

10. Structural design map alongwith certificate for structural safety.



12. Solar energy provisions for street lighting and stair case lighting should be made and plans submitted.

13. STP is proposed in basement. For basement, only modular STP shall be accepted. No civil construction in basement for STP shall be allowed.

14. Section drawing for roads showing all services i.e. footpath/parking/sewage/drainage.

15. A CSR Plan with Rs. 2.5 crore should be prepared and details submitted. 16. Reflecting paints on roof top and side walls.

17. All plans related to sewer Drainage external electrification landscape plan rain water harvesting water supply to be submitted.

18. No objection for firefighting from competent authority.

19. Horticulture waste processing at site.

20. Submit copy of letter from competent regarding exemption of LIG /EWS plan.

21. Proposal regarding convenient shop/ Play school/ATM/community Hall as per

norms.


his letter dated 25-09-2014. Which was put up in SEAC meeting dated 07-10-2014. A

presentation was made by Ms. Richa Singh, Project Proponent along with their consultant

M/s ENV Developmental Assistance Systems Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the

documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for proposed Group Housing Project at Plot

No-7D/GH-03, Awadh Vihar Yojna, Sultanpur Road, Lucknow. M/s Certa

Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

2. Area details of the project is as follows:

Particulars Details

Plot Area 8262 m2

Gr. Coverage 2018.18 m2


of 48

FAR Permissible- 30,982.5 m2 (@ 3.75)

Proposed- 28,706.85 m2

Basement 6958.01 x 2 =13916.03 m2

Built up area 42,622.88 m2

Towers 5

Floors B + 14

Green Area 1240 m2

Dwelling Units Residential: 250

EWS: Nil

Population 1250

Fresh Water Demand 89 KLD

Total Runoff 195; 2 pits

Solid waste Generated 659 kg/day

3. Salient features of the project is as follows:

Parking Space Available Area (sqm) Parking

Basement parking (Net basement Area-11,150

m2), Excluding service area

Four wheeler (90% of total Basement Area) @

30 m2 per ECS

Two wheeler (10% of total Basement Area) @

10 m2 per two wheeler

10035 sqm

1115 sqm

334 ECS

111 vehicles

space

10% Visitors Parking 1000 sqm 40 ECS

Total Parking 485 ECS

Required Parking

According to MoEF norms:

@ 1 ECS for 100 m2 permissible FAR area (30983 /100)

310 ECS

According to State norms:

@ 1 ECS for 80 m2 of permissible FAR area (30983 /80)

387 ECS

10% Visitor’s Parking 40 ECS

Total Required Parking 427 vehicle space

Parking Provided 485 vehicle space


of 48

4. Water requirement details of the project is as follows:

S.

No. Description unit/Area

(in m2)

Total

Occupa

ncy

Rate of water

demand (lpcd) Total

Fresh

Water

(KD)

Total

Flushing/Rec

ycled water

(KLD)

Total

Water

Requireme

nt (KLD)

1.

Residential

250 units

1250

Fresh Water @ 65

LPCD Flushing Water @

21 LPCD

81 26 107

2. Staff

5% of

total

population

65

Fresh Water @ 30


15 LPCD

2.0

1.0

3.0

3. Visitors

10%of

total

population

125

Fresh Water @ 5


10 LPCD

1.0

1.5

2.5

4. Swimming

pool

5.0 5.0

Total Domestic water 89

28.5 Say ~ 29

~ 118

Horticulture and

Landscape

development

1,240 sqm

1 l/sqm

1.5

1.5

Filter

backwash 5 5

Cooling

water for

DG sets

750 KVA 0.9 l/KVA/Hr 6 6

Grand Total = 131 KLD

Water/ Waste water Details

Fresh water 89 KLD

Flushing 29 KLD

Horticulture / Landscape 1.5 KLD

DG set cooling 6 KLD

Filter Backwash 5 KLD

Total water requirement 131 KLD

Waste water 106 KLD

Source of water - Groundwater till municipal supply is available

STP Capacity– 130 KLD (20 % extra for future expansion)

Storm Water Calculation


of 48

Peak Run off

Max, Rainfall Intensity 40 mm/hr

Location Runoff

Coefficient

Area m2 Rainfall

intensity

Peak Run

off in m3/hr (in m)

Roof Area 0.8 2018 0.04 65

Paved Area 0.6 5004 0.04 120

Green Area 0.2 1240 0.04 10

Total Runoff m3/hr 195

5. No. of pits required = 2 pits

6. Solid waste generation and its management details is as follows:

S.No. Particulars Population Waste generated in

kg/day

1. Residential (@0.5kg/day) 1250 625

2. Visitors (@0.15kg/day) 125 19

3. Staff (@ 0.15kg/day) 65 10

Total Solid waste generated Approx. 654 kg/day

Horticulture Waste (@ .0037/sq/day) 5 Kg/Day

E-Waste (0.15 kg/C/Yr) < 1 Kg/Day

7. The project proposals are covered under category 8 “a” of EIA Notification, 2006.

The committee examined the documents as above and recommended grant of

environmental clearance for the proposals along with general conditions as prescribed by the


1. The Modular STP detail project report is to be submitted. 2. Before starting the construction, the Byelaws of concerned authority shall be submitted

to SEIAA. 3. Before starting the construction the plans should be approved by the competent

authority. 4. Permission from the competent authority to drain out waste water to municipal drain

shall be submitted.

5. Undertaking shall be provided for installing modular STP along with details. 6. Installing online water quality monitoring devices with recycled water line along with

flow measuring device. 7. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from



of 48

8. Adequate green cover not less than 33% of the plotted area should be provided within the premises.

9. STP to be installed and treated water should be used for construction phase. 10. STP drawing design and cost estimate has to be submitted within 03 months from

issuance of the Environmental Clearance. 11. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more

capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for



be used in house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving to end

users.

13. SWM organic converter drawing, design and cost estimate has to be submitted within

03 months from issuance of the Environmental Clearance

14. Approved site plan from authority to be submitted within 03 months from issuance of

the Environmental Clearance.

15. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 2% of total project profit shall be submitted (within the month) on need

base assessment study in the study area. Income generating measures which can help in upliftment of weaker section of society consistent with the traditional skills of the

people identified. The programme can include activities such as old age homes, rain water harvesting provisions in nearby areas, development of fodder farm, fruit bearing

orchards, vocational training etc. In addition, vocational training for individuals shall be imparted so that poor section of society can take up self-employment and jobs. Separate

budget for community development activities and income generating programmers shall be specified.

16. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided. 17. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. Solar light is to be provided in

the open areas with 50% of them may be with dual power.

18. Parking guideline as per Noida authority should be followed.

19. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

20. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system permission from

the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

21. All internal roads should not be less than 9 m wide.

22. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done




capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building. 24. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP

to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines. 25. Wheel wash arrangement is to be made at exit point during construction phase.

26. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase. 27. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities.

28. Parking for disabled persons should be explored. 29. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of

residents. 30. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be

followed for construction work.


of 48




34. Guidelines of NHAI to be followed. 35. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In



construction.




drinking, bathing and in swimming pool.

40. Any litigation pending in the Courts of Law it shall be binding on project proponent.

41. Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green

Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under Section 11 of the

National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997.

11- Cement Grinding Plant at Plot No-F-6&7, Vill-Udayrampur Nangla, Tehsil-

Dhaulana, Distt-Hapur File No. 2470/AD(H)

A presentation was made by Mr. Chaintanya Shah, representative of the project

proponent and along with their consultant M/s EQMS India Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through

the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Proposed Cement Grinding Plant at Plot

No-F-6&7, Vill-Udayrampur Nangla, Tehsil-Dhaulana, Distt-Hapur.


� Land Location Plot No 6 &7, Village: Udayrampuri, Tehsil: Dhaulana,

District: Hapur,UP

� Total Area: 18920 Sq. m

� Landuse:

Company has acquires a plot of 2100 Sq Meter in UPSIDC

Masoorie and 1.682 Ha land situated at Khasara 6 & 7 in Village

Udayarampur Nangla, Pargana Dasana, Tehsil Dhaulana and

District Hapur in Uttar Pradesh. Both the plots are adjoining

plots. No additional land acquisition involved. Hence no

change envisaged in existing land use Pattern.

� Type of unit Cement Grinding Unit

� Capacity CLINKER 2 x 1,17,000 Tonnes Per Annum

� Raw Material Clinker 2 X 1,17,000 TPA (Rajasthan), Gypsum 2 X 54,000 TPA (NMDC Rajasthan), Fly Ash 2 X 9,000 TPA (NTPC)

� Variety of Cement OPC (Ordinary Portland Cement), PPC (Portland Pozzolona Cement)

� Existing Water requirement

2700 Liter per Day

� Source of water Tube well with overhead tank


of 48

� Electric requirement The maximum power requirement will be 2 x 1200KVA for 2 x

500 TPD cement grinding clinker. The electricity requirement is

sufficient for the proposed project. Source U P. state electricity

board.

3. The project proposals are covered under category 3”b” of EIA Notification, 2006.

The committee discussed the matter and recommended following additional TORs

and general guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:

Additional TORs 1. Approved plan from Hapur Industrial Development Authority.

2. Details of total area, covered area, open area, factory area, lab area, raw material store

yard.

3. Environment Impact study must be done (by a consultant registered/certified as per QCI

notification/MoEF directives) in an area of 15 km radius with inclusion of following

aspects: 4. Present land use based on satellite imagery should be included. Study area should be 10

Km radius. 5. Details of location of wildlife sanctuary and national parks within 10 km radius of the

plant and plan for conservation and protection of the same should be included. 6. Manufacturing process details for the cement plant should be included.

7. Mass balance for the raw material and products should be included. 8. Energy balance data for all the components should be incorporated.

9. Site-specific micro-meteorological data for temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind

speed and direction and rainfall including inversion height and mixing height should be

included.

10. Collection of baseline data on air, water (surface and ground water), soil, noise,

demography etc. for one season other than monsoon should be included and the Methods

of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV): Guidance for assessment of

representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental attributes detailed under EIA

manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.

11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from

project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.

12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for the

presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical

characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data. 13. Ambient air quality modeling for cement plant should be included. Air quality modeling

for all the plants proposed for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be included.

14. Ambient air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following:

i. Emissions (g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures. ii. Meteorological inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind direction, ambient air

temperature, cloud cover, relative humidity & mixing height) on hourly basis.

iii. Model input options for terrain, plume rise, deposition etc.

iv. Print-out of model input and output on hourly and daily average basis.

v. A graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind

distance at every 500 m interval covering the exact location of GLC.


of 48

vi. Details of air pollution control methods used with percentage efficiency that are used for emission rate estimation with respect to each pollutant.

vii. Applicable air quality standards as per LULC covered in the study area and % contribution of the proposed plant to the applicable Air quality standard. In case of

expansion project, the contribution should be inclusive of both existing and expanded capacity.

viii. No. I-VII is to be repeated for fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant and used for industry.

ix. Graphs of monthly average daily concentration with down-wind distance.

x. Specify when and where the ambient air quality standards are exceeded either due to

the proposed plant alone or when the plant contribution is added to the background

air quality.

xi. Fugitive dust protection or dust reduction technology for workers within 30 m of the

plant active areas.

15. Sources of secondary emissions, its control and monitoring as per the CPCB guidelines

should be included.

16. Details of fugitive emissions and control technologies should be provided.

17. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal

particularly slag from any sources. 18. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporation of RSPM data should be

included. Location of one AAQM station should be in downwind direction. 19. Presence of an aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for

recharging the aquifer should be included. 20. Source of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),

metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage and distance from project site

should also be included. 21. Ground water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to

quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.

22. Ground water modeling showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included.

23. Column leachate study for all types of stockpiles or waste disposal sites, at 20oC-50

oC

should be conducted and included.

24. Permission for the drawl of water 94 KLD water from the concerned authority and water

balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and

discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation

should be included.

25. Efforts made to minimize use of ground water along with an action plan should be

provided.

26. A chapter on hydrology study by the State Govt. may be included. 27. Action plan for surface as well as roof top rainwater harvesting and ground water

recharge should be included. 28. Scheme of proper storage of fly ash, gypsum, clinker should be included.

29. Action plan for 100% fly ash utilization should be included. 30. Impact of transportation of raw materials and the details of mitigation measures should be

included. 31. Ambient air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be

included for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with emissions (g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures and A graph of daily averaged

concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval


of 48

covering the exact location of GLC. 32. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources

as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.

33. Detailed description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.

34. Risk assessment and damage control should be included. 35. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, A note on the impact of drawl of

ground water on recharge potential.

36. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Surface water quality of nearby River

(60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at eight locations must be

ascertained.

37. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zone Mapping is

required at 1:5000 to 1:10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean river discharge as well

as flood occurrence frequency.

38. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for different

purposes should be included.

39. Provision of traps and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil,

grease and cleaning agents. 40. If the water is mixed with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further

transport should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the transport capacity.

41. The pathways for pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied for surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water with a

monitoring and management plans. 42. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,

Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.

43. Geo-technical data by a bore hole of up to 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as

ground water level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for

liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk

Management in the area.

44. End use of solid waste and its composition should be covered.

45. All stock piles will have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of materials to

ground water.

46. Studies on amount of CO2 emission (daily monitoring), Hydrocarbons, other

contamination, if any, and their management.

47. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration including evaluation of noise, heat,

illumination, dust, any other chemicals, metals being suspected in environment and going into body of workers either through inhalation, ingestion or through skin

absorption and steps taken to avoid Musculo-Skeletal Disorders (MSD), backache, pain in minor and major joints, fatigue etc. Occupational hazards specific pre-placement and

periodical monitoring and periodical monitoring should be carried out. The detailed plan to carry out above mentioned activity should be mentioned.

48. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33% area should be included. The green belt should be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the

traveling roads should also be incorporated. All rooftops/terraces should have some green cover.

49. Demography of the area and socio-economic development activities need to be


of 48

elaborated upon. 50. Scheme for compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines for

cement plants should be included. 51. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit project should be

included. 52. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to details of air

pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency and implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.

53. EMP should include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques,

energy conservation and natural resource conservation.

54. Total capital cost & recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures.

55. Any litigation/court case pending against the proposal or land should also be included.

56. A tabular chart of the TORs and compliance index should be incorporated in EIA/EMP.

57. Project falling with in 10 km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from

National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not earmarked.

58. The proposal is exempted from public hearing by categorizing in B-2 category due to use

of energy efficient technology, on clinker manufacturing at the proposed site, no sensitive

area within 10 km. radius, "zero" effluent discharge, utilization of all the solid waste in

the process itself including utilization of fly ash etc. 59. Design details of Modular STP.

60. No objection certificate from UPSIDC regarding external land. 61. Public Hearing to be conducted if external land beside UPSIDC land is used for proposed

project. 62. Details site plan all existing features within 30 metres from Perry ferry of the proposed

site. 63. Submit the AM plant Emission controlled during transfer period.

64. Submit the industrial project report with cost of all appliances. 65. Submit the green belt plan on map of proposed site as required by rule.

66. Besides the above, the general points mentioned below should also to be followed during

preparation of EIA/EMP:

• All documents to be properly referenced with index, page numbers and continuous page numbering.

• Where data are presented in the report especially in tables, the period in which the

data were collected and the sources should be indicated.

As decided by the State Expert Appraisal Committee the above TORs should be

considered for preparation of EIA/EMP report for the Cement Plant; in addition to all

the relevant information as per the Generic Structure of EIA given in Appendix III and IIIA

in the EIA Notification, 2006.

12- Greenfield Facility of Manufacturing Plant for H-Acid, Intermediate & Rective

Dyes at Plot No-A- 2, UPSIDC Industrial Area, Vill-Kosi Kotwan, Chhata, Mathura.

File No. 2471/DD(Y)


project was submitted to SEIAA on dated 06-08-2014.A presentation was made by Mr.

Vijendra Mital, representative of the project proponent and along with their consultant M/s

EQMS India Pvt. Ltd. The committee discussed the matter and recommended following

additional TORs and general guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:


of 48

1. Distance of proposed site from Taz Trapzeam boundary is to be given.

2. Incremental effect towards wind direction is to be given. 3. Nearest settlement as located is to be given in map.

4. 30% green belt is to be provided and land scape plan is to be submitted. 5. Approved building plan from the UPSIDC along with location of existing building

is to be submitted. 6. Statements regarding hazardeious chemicals and its tixity are to be given.

7. Vinyl manufacturing processing should be given in details. Executive summary of

the project.

8. Justification of the project.

9. Promoters and their back ground.

10. Regulatory framework.

11. Data for the stack emissions, fugitive emissions; water requirement and water

balance chart; wastewater generation, treated effluent quality, re-utilization and

disposal of solid/hazardous waste for the existing unit.

12. Project location and plant layout.

13. Infrastructure facilities including power sources.

14. Total cost of the project alongwith total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures.

15. Project site location alongwith site map of 10 km area and site details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.

16. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10 km radius. Details of land availability for the project alongwith supporting document.

17. Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Reserve forest within 10 km radius of the project.

18. Permission from the State Forest Department regarding the impact of the proposed plant on the surrounding reserve forests.

19. Details of the total land and break-up of the land use for green belt and other uses.

20. List of products along with the production capacities.

21. Detailed list of raw material required and source, mode of storage.

22. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reactions and process flow

chart.

23. Action plan for the transportation and storage of raw materials and products.

24. Sources and quantity of fuel (coal etc.) for the boiler. Measures to take care of SO2

emission. A copy of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with the coal

suppliers shall be submitted, in case coal is used.

25. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly

wind speed and direction and rainfall. 26. Ambient air quality monitoring at 6 locations within the study area of 5 km., aerial

coverage from project site as per NAAQES notified on 16th September, 2009. 27. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.

28. One season site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except

monsoon) for PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx, CO, HC including VOCs shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall take into account the pre-dominant wind

direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests. Data for water and noise monitoring shall also be included.


of 48

29. Air pollution control measures proposed for the effective control of gaseous/process emissions within permissible limits. Emphasis shall be on effective control of VOC

and odour. 30. Name of all the solvents to be used in the process and details of solvent recovery

system. 31. Design details of ETP, incinerator, if any alongwith boiler, scrubbers/bag filters etc.

32. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation plan. 33. Action plan to control ambient air quality as per NAAQS Standards notified by the

Ministry in November 2009.

34. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the

sources.

35. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of

ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-

specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling for proposed plant.

36. Permission from competent Authority for the drawl of water. Water balance chart

for existing and expansion project including quantity of effluent generated recycled

and reused and effluent discharge.

37. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristics of untreated and treated

effluent to meet the standard. Treated wastewater to meet the norms of treated discharge for CETP.

38. The EIA study should explain the impact at different heights for different seasons covering the distance of 500 mts atlest based on modeling.

39. Zero discharge effluent concepts to be adopted. 40. Ground water quality monitoring minimum at 6 locations shall be carried out.

41. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area and ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic).

42. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly related to the hazardous waste calorific value of hazardous

waste and detailed characteristic of the hazardous waste.

43. Submit Ash management plan. Precautions to be taken during storage and

transportation of hazardous chemicals shall be clearly mentioned and incorporated.

44. Material Safety Data Sheet for all the Chemicals are being used/will be used. CAS

No./RTECS No./DOT/UN etc to be mentioned against each chemicals.

45. Authorization/Membership for the disposal of solid/hazardous waste in TSDF.

46. Risk assessment for storage for chemicals/solvents. Action plan for handling &

safety system.

47. Action plan for development of green belt over minimum 33 % of the total project

area within plant premises with at least 10 meter wide green belt on all sides along

the periphery of the project area, in downward direction, and along road sides etc. 48. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be included to

harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water.

49. Details of occupational health programme. a. To which chemicals, workers are exposed directly or indirectly.

b. Whether these chemicals are within Threshold Limit Values (TLV)/ Permissible c. Exposure Levels as per ACGIH recommendation.

d. What measures company has taken to keep these chemicals within PEL( Permissible Exposure Limit) /TLV (Threshold Limit Value).


of 48

e. How the workers are evaluated concerning their exposure to chemicals during pre-placement and periodical medical monitoring.

f. Liver function tests (LFT) during pre-placement and periodical examination. 50. What are onsite and offsite emergency plan during chemical disaster.

51. Details of occupational health surveillance programme. 52. Socio-economic development activities shall be in place.

53. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines. 54. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to details of

air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring

frequency, responsibility and time bound implementation plan for mitigation

measure shall be provided.

55. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle / reuse / recover

techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

56. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control

measures.

57. Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any

Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.

58. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be submitted.

The committee also deliberated that:

i. The draft EIA-EMP shall be prepared on the aforesaid ‘TORs’ in addition to all the relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III

and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. ii. The TORs prescribed shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the

EIA-EMP report including public hearing proceedings. iii. The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP report after accreditation

with Quality Council of India/National Accreditation Board of Education and

Training (QCI/NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the

EIA-EMP reports

iv. A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TORs, Shall be

submitted for appraisal.

v. Study regarding impact on flora and fauna is to be provided.

vi. Odor management study to be conducted and incorporated as a separate chapter.

vii. Disaster management plan on site is to be provided for the safety of the people of

plant and workers.

viii. TTG Authority rules to be followed.

13- Sand/Morum Mining, Khand No-15, Arazi No-1161, 1122, 967 at Vill-Sahabadia

Sultanpur,Tehsil- Sagadi, Distt-Azamgarh (Area-1.49 Acre) Sri Virendra Pal Singh

File No. 2414/DD(Y)

A presentation was made by the Shri Virendra Pal Singh, authorized representative of project proponent along with their consultant M/s Sawen consultancy services Pvt. Ltd. The

proponent, through the documents submitted and presentation made, informed the committee that:


of 48

1. The environmental clearance is sought for proposed Sand/Morum Mining, Khand No-

15, Arazi No-1161, 1122, 967 at Vill-Sahabadia Sultanpur,Tehsil- Sagadi, Distt-

Azamgarh (Area-1.49 Acre)

2. As per the form-1 the collection of 27840 MTPA Sand is proposed from 1.49 acres

mining lease area.

3. The mining plan has been prepared by Shri UPS Chauhan (RQP No.-RQP/DDN/165/2005/A).

4. Lease for the project was sanctioned for 03 years from 01-12-2011 to 30-11-2014.

5. Mining will be opencast type and manual. No drilling and blasting is proposed.

6. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining

projects specified in EIA Notification 14-09-2006.

7. During operation the maximum number of workers is 20.

8. The water requirement will be limited to 12.6 KLD.

9. The ultimate depth of mining will be restricted to 03 meter/water table, whichever is

less. The mining would be restricted to unsaturated zone only above the phreatic water table and will not intersect the ground water table at any point of time.

10. The mining operation will not be carried out in safety zone of any bridge or embankment or in eco-fragile zone such as habitat of any wild fauna.

11. This project does not attract any of the general conditions applicable on mining projects specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006 as per affidavit dated 04/08/2014

submitted by the project proponent. 12. The project proposal fall under category – 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended).

13. There is no litigation pending in any court regarding the project.

The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental

clearance to the proposals as above along with general conditions prescribed for sand/moram

mining projects and following specific conditions:

1. High flood level is 60.50 metre and low flood level is 60.0 metre and river Ghagra

width is 1500 metre as such 200 metre is to be left for safety purpose film edge of the

river.

2. Environmental clearance up to 30.11.14 as per validity of the lease. In case, the project proponent does not have a valid lease, this environmental clearance shall

automatically become null and void. 3. The Environmental clearance will be co-terminus with the mining lease period.

4. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not

earmarked.

5. The project proponent will submit the approved mining plan within 03 month from

the date of issuance of the E.C. letter. Failing which E.C. will be deemed to be

cancelled.

6. Social Corporate Responsibility (SCR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 5% of total project cost shall be submitted within three month on need

base assessment study in the study area. Income generating measures which can help

in up-liftment of weaker section of society consistent with the traditional skills of the


of 48

people identified. The programme can include activities such as development of

fodder farm, fruit bearing orchards, vocational training etc. In addition, vocational

training for individuals shall be imparted so that poor section of society can take up

self employment and jobs. Separate budget for community development activities and

income generating programmes shall be specified.

7. The mining work will be open-cast and exclusively manual. No mechanical work or

drilling/blasting should be involved at any stage.

8. It shall be ensured that there shall be no mining of any type within 03 m or 10% of the

width which-ever is less, shall be left on both the banks of precise area to control and

avoid erosion of river bank. The mining is confined to extraction of sand/moram from

the river bed only.

9. The project proponent shall undertake adequate safeguard measures during extraction

of river bed material and ensure that due to this activity the hydro-geological regime

of the surrounding area shall not be affected.

10. The project proponent shall adhere to mining in conformity to plan submitted for the

mine lease conditions and the Rules prescribed in this regard clearly showing the no

work zone in the mine lease i.e. the distance from the bank of river to be left un-

worked (Non mining area), distance from the bridges etc. It shall be ensured that no

mining shall be carried out during the monsoon season.

11. The project proponent shall ensure that wherever deployment of labour attracts the

Mines Act, the provision thereof shall be strictly followed.

12. The project proponent will provide personal protective equipment (PPE) as required,

also provid adequate training and information on safety and health aspects. Periodical

medical examination of the workers engaged in the project shall be carried out and

records maintained. For the purpose, schedule of health examination of the workers

should be drawn and followed accordingly.

13. The critical parameters such as PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx in the ambient air within

the impact zone shall be monitored periodically. Further, quality of discharged water

if any shall also be monitored [(TDS, DO, pH, Fecal Coliform and Total Suspended

Solids (TSS)].

14. Effective safeguard measures, such as regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in

critical areas prone to air pollution and having high levels of particulate matter such as

loading and unloading point and all transfer points. Extensive water sprinkling shall

be carried out on haul roads.

15. It should be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality parameters conform to the norms

prescribed by the Central Pollution Control Board in this regard.

16. The extended mining scheme will be submitted by the proponent before expiry of

present mining plan.

17. Four ambient air quality-monitoring stations should be established in the core zone as

well as in the buffer zone for monitoring PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx. Location of

the stations should be decided based on the meteorological data, topographical

features and environmentally and ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of


of 48

monitoring should be undertaken in consultation with the State Pollution Control

Board.

18. Common road for transportation of mineral is to be maintained collectively. Total cost

will be shared/worked out on the basis of lease area among users.

19. Proponent will provide adequate sanitary facility in the form of mobile toilets to the

labours engaged for the project work.

20. Solid waste material viz., gutkha pouchs, plastic bags, glasses etc. to be generated

during project activity will be separately storage in bins and managed as per Solid

Waste Management rules.

21. Green area/belt to be developed along haulage road in consultation of Gram

Sabha/Panchyat.

22. Natural/customary paths used by villagers should not be obstructed at any time by the

activities proposed under the project.

23. Digital processing of the entire lease area in the district using remote sensing

technique should be done regularly once in three years for monitoring the change of

river course by Directorate of Geology and Mining, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh. The

record of such study to be maintained and report be submitted to Regional office of

MoEF, SEIAA, U.P. and UPPCB.

24. A copy of clearance letter will be marked to concerned Panchayat / local NGO, if any,

from whom suggestion / representation has been received while processing the

proposal. The clearance letter shall also be put on the website of the company.

25. State Pollution Control Board shall display a copy of the clearance letter at the

Regional office, District Industry Centre and Collector’s office/Tehsildar’s Office for

30 days.

26. The project authorities shall advertise at least in two local newspapers widely

circulated, one of which shall be in the vernacular language of the locality concerned,

within 7 days of the issue of the clearance letter informing that the project has been

accorded environmental clearance and a copy of the clearance letter is available with

the State Pollution Control Board and also at web site of the SEIAA at

http://www.seiaaup.com and a copy of the same shall be forwarded to the Regional

Office of the Ministry located in Lucknow, CPCB, State PCB.

27. The MoEF/SEIAA or any other competent authority may alter/modify the above

conditions or stipulate any further condition in the interest of environment protection.

28. Concealing factual data or submission of false/fabricated data and failure to comply

with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in withdrawal of this clearance

and attract action under the provisions of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.




30. Waste water from potable use be collected and reused for sprinkling.

31. During the school opening and closing time vehicle movement will be restricted.


of 48

14- Sand Mining Project at Bhukhand no- 320, 96, 91, Vill-Mahula, Sagidi, Azamgarh,

U.P. (Leased Area 2.17 Acre) Sri Manish Kumar Mishra, Vill-Mishrpur, Sagidi,

Azamgarh, U.P. File No. 2429/DD(Y) A presentation was made by the Sri Manish Kumar Mishra,authorized representative

of project proponent along with their consultant M/s Sawen consultancy services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and presentation made, informed the

committee that:

1. The environmental clearance is sought for proposed Sand Mining Project at

Bhukhand no- 320, 96, 91, Vill-Mahula, Sagidi, Azamgarh, U.P. (Leased Area 2.17

Acre).

2. As per the form-1 the collection of 39700 MTPA Sand is proposed from 2.17 acres

mining lease area.

3. The mining plan has been prepared by Shri UPS Chauhan (RQP No.-

RQP/DDN/165/2005/A). 4. Lease for the project was sanctioned for 03 years from 01-12-2011 to 30-11-2014.

5. 250 working days in a year are proposed for mining.

6. Mining will be opencast type and manual. No drilling and blasting is proposed.


projects specified in EIA Notification 14-09-2006.

8. During operation the maximum number of workers is 20.

9. The water requirement will be limited to 3.50 KLD.

10. The ultimate depth of mining will be restricted to 03 meter/water table, whichever is

less. The mining would be restricted to unsaturated zone only above the phreatic

water table and will not intersect the ground water table at any point of time.

11. The mining operation will not be carried out in safety zone of any bridge or

embankment or in eco-fragile zone such as habitat of any wild fauna.


projects specified in EIA Notification 14/09/2006 as per affidavit dated 04/08/2014

submitted by the project proponent.

13. The project proposal fall under category – 1(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended). 14. There is no litigation pending in any court regarding the project.

The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental

clearance to the proposals as above along with general conditions prescribed for sand/moram mining projects and following specific conditions:

1. This environmental clearance shall be subject to valid lease in favour of project

proponent for the proposed mining proposals. In case, the project proponent does not

have a valid lease, this environmental clearance shall automatically become null and

void.

2. The Environmental clearance will be co-terminus with the mining lease period.

3. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not

earmarked.


of 48

4. The project proponent will submit the approved mining plan within 03 month from

the date of issuance of the E.C. letter. Failing which E.C. will be deemed to be

cancelled.

5. Social Corporate Responsibility (SCR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 5% of total project cost shall be submitted within three month on need

base assessment study in the study area. Income generating measures which can help

in up-liftment of weaker section of society consistent with the traditional skills of the

people identified. The programme can include activities such as development of

fodder farm, fruit bearing orchards, vocational training etc. In addition, vocational

training for individuals shall be imparted so that poor section of society can take up

self employment and jobs. Separate budget for community development activities and

income generating programmes shall be specified.

6. The mining work will be open-cast and exclusively manual. No mechanical work or

drilling/blasting should be involved at any stage.

7. It shall be ensured that there shall be no mining of any type within 03 m or 10% of the

width which-ever is less, shall be left on both the banks of precise area to control and

avoid erosion of river bank. The mining is confined to extraction of sand/moram from

the river bed only.

8. The project proponent shall undertake adequate safeguard measures during extraction

of river bed material and ensure that due to this activity the hydro-geological regime

of the surrounding area shall not be affected.

9. The project proponent shall adhere to mining in conformity to plan submitted for the

mine lease conditions and the Rules prescribed in this regard clearly showing the no

work zone in the mine lease i.e. the distance from the bank of river to be left un-

worked (Non mining area), distance from the bridges etc. It shall be ensured that no

mining shall be carried out during the monsoon season.

10. The project proponent shall ensure that wherever deployment of labour attracts the

Mines Act, the provision thereof shall be strictly followed.

11. The project proponent will provide personal protective equipment (PPE) as required,

also provid adequate training and information on safety and health aspects. Periodical

medical examination of the workers engaged in the project shall be carried out and

records maintained. For the purpose, schedule of health examination of the workers

should be drawn and followed accordingly.

12. The critical parameters such as PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx in the ambient air within

the impact zone shall be monitored periodically. Further, quality of discharged water

if any shall also be monitored [(TDS, DO, pH, Fecal Coliform and Total Suspended

Solids (TSS)].

13. Effective safeguard measures, such as regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in

critical areas prone to air pollution and having high levels of particulate matter such as

loading and unloading point and all transfer points. Extensive water sprinkling shall

be carried out on haul roads.

14. It should be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality parameters conform to the norms

prescribed by the Central Pollution Control Board in this regard.


of 48

15. The extended mining scheme will be submitted by the proponent before expiry of

present mining plan.

16. Four ambient air quality-monitoring stations should be established in the core zone as

well as in the buffer zone for monitoring PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx. Location of

the stations should be decided based on the meteorological data, topographical

features and environmentally and ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of

monitoring should be undertaken in consultation with the State Pollution Control

Board.

17. Common road for transportation of mineral is to be maintained collectively. Total cost

will be shared/worked out on the basis of lease area among users.

18. Proponent will provide adequate sanitary facility in the form of mobile toilets to the

labours engaged for the project work.

19. Solid waste material viz., gutkha pouchs, plastic bags, glasses etc. to be generated

during project activity will be separately storage in bins and managed as per Solid

Waste Management rules.

20. Green area/belt to be developed along haulage road in consultation of Gram

Sabha/Panchyat.

21. Natural/customary paths used by villagers should not be obstructed at any time by the

activities proposed under the project.

22. Digital processing of the entire lease area in the district using remote sensing

technique should be done regularly once in three years for monitoring the change of

river course by Directorate of Geology and Mining, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh. The

record of such study to be maintained and report be submitted to Regional office of

MoEF, SEIAA, U.P. and UPPCB.

23. A copy of clearance letter will be marked to concerned Panchayat / local NGO, if any,

from whom suggestion / representation has been received while processing the

proposal. The clearance letter shall also be put on the website of the company.

24. State Pollution Control Board shall display a copy of the clearance letter at the

Regional office, District Industry Centre and Collector’s office/Tehsildar’s Office for

30 days.

25. The project authorities shall advertise at least in two local newspapers widely

circulated, one of which shall be in the vernacular language of the locality concerned,

within 7 days of the issue of the clearance letter informing that the project has been

accorded environmental clearance and a copy of the clearance letter is available with

the State Pollution Control Board and also at web site of the SEIAA at

http://www.seiaaup.com and a copy of the same shall be forwarded to the Regional

Office of the Ministry located in Lucknow, CPCB, State PCB.

26. The MoEF/SEIAA or any other competent authority may alter/modify the above

conditions or stipulate any further condition in the interest of environment protection.

27. Concealing factual data or submission of false/fabricated data and failure to comply

with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in withdrawal of this clearance

and attract action under the provisions of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.


of 48




29. Waste water from potable use be collected and reused for sprinkling.

30. During the school opening and closing time vehicle movement will be restricted.

15- Mega Leather Cluster located at Vill-Kuraina Bahadurnagar & Senpuirabpara

Near Ramaipur, Distt-Kanpur, U.P Sri Ashraf Rizwan, Director, C/o Sultan

Tanners, Jajmau, Kanpur, U.P. File No. 2070/OSD(T)

The State Level Expert Appraisal Committee noted that the matter was considered

earlier in the meeting held on 03-10-2013 and the Committee recommended the ToRs for

EIA studies.

The project Proponent submitted the EIA through letter Dated 20-05-2014. The EIA

was considered in SEAC meeting 27-06-2014. The proponent, through the documents

submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. Proposed Industrial Estate “Mega Leather Cluster” will be developed at Villages

Kurauna Bahadur Nagar & Senpurab Para near Ramaipur District, Kanpur Nagar

District, U.P. on land measuring 708202.78 sqm of land having 138 tannery units. The

units proposed to be set up would house tanners as well as finished leather product

manufacturers. In this regard, the project proponent needs to submit the mentioned MOU

between the UPSIDC and the Board of directors of the said company/promoters and the

copy of the notification of the UPSIDC declaring the proposed site as the approved

industrial area.

2. The land will be allotted to SPV “M/s Mega Leather Cluster Development (U.P.) Ltd.”

by UPSIDC for setting up of the Park under the Mega Leather Cluster scheme of DIPP.

The allotment of land to the SPV by UPSIDC is under progress. The plots shall be of two

categories with size ranging from 4000 sqm to 2000 sqm with total 138 units. The green

belt development area has been kept as 95,388.84 sqm (13.47%). Total Proposed

capacity of processing of raw hides/skins for 138 Tannery Units shall be 23400

hides/day i.e. 561.60 TPD. The project falls under category B of schedule 7 (c) as per

the EIA Notification dated 14th

September 2006.

3. The water will be required mainly for domestic, process & washing, D.G. cooling, Water

Body, Gardening and misc. purpose. Total water requirement has been computed as

20821 KLD. Fresh water requirement will be 20457 KLD. The water requirement will be

met from Public water supply system provided within the Industrial Estate or Ground

water supply after getting permission from CGWA. Total waste water of 18454 KLD

shall be generated, out of which total process waste water generated from the proposed

Leather Cluster will be approx. 18196 KLD and other waste from domestic, DG cooling

and misc use will be 258 KLD. Each tannery unit within the cluster will be directed to

discharge the waste water separately at the utility area into three categories namely

soaking waste water having high TDS, Chrome Tanning waste water & other general


of 48

waste water. There shall be a provision of CETP of 15000 KLD. The chrome waste

water will be treated in CETP after chrome recovery in CRU. The general waste water

shall also be treated in CETP. The high TDS waste water from each unit shall be

collected at CETP in a separate tank and then pumped into the pond. 364 KLD of treated

water shall be reused in DG cooling, gardening, water body and misc purposes. Excess

Treated water 13710 KLD shall be disposed off to drain. In this regard the complete

details of the drainage system with map, final discharge point description, a undertaking

from the STP owner as mentioned by the project proponent shall be submitted along with

purposeful usage of the waste, if planned any.

4. The power supply shall be drawn from the U.P State Electricity Board. The electric load

for the proposed unit is estimated to be 15750 KW (Plot type 1 : 4950 KW, Plot type 2 :

10800 KW). DG sets of 62.5 KVA (for each leather industry) unit & DG sets of capacity

2 x 250 KVA which shall be installed for emergency use during power failure for

common services will be provided for power backups & 3 TPH capacity boiler in each

tannery unit will be provided. Proper stack height for DG sets & Boiler shall be provided

for Air Pollution Control. Also Multi cyclone dust collector/wet scrubber will be

provided to control particulate emissions.

5. For noise pollution control DG Set shall be bought acoustically enclosed. Noise will be

from the process machinery which will be housed inside the covered room. The will be

no increase in ambient Noise Level.

6. Optimum parking provision of 3360 ECS shall be provided within the tannery unit.

7. Process waste generated will include 46.8 TPD of fleshing which will be sold to glue

manufacturers & dog chew, 23.4 TPD of shaving which will be sold to leather board

manufacturer & 23.4 TPD of trimmings or splitting which will be sold to lower quality

of leather goods manufacturers etc. 945 kg/day Municipal Solid Waste will be generated

out of which 662 kg/day biodegradable waste will be send to Vermi-composting site

within the project site & 236 Kg/day recyclable waste will be given to authorized

recycler & 47 Kg/day of inert waste shall be disposed off at nearby landfill site. Used

Oil: Approx. 14.6 Lt/day of Used oil from machineries/D.G. Set will be sold to vendors

authorized by Central Pollution Control Board for the treatment of the same. CETP

Sludge approx. 29117 kg/day shall be generated. CETP Sludge shall be disposed off at

Secured land fill sites of TSDF within the specified distance which will be created for 15

years HW storage as per CPCB/MOEF guidelines and approval.

8. The project proposals are covered under category 4"f" of EIA notification, 2006.

The committee discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit

following information:

1. Provision for Centralized storage for raw hides.

2. Provision of Separate drains for chrome extraction effluents

3. Map of drains and the drainage system for the recycle of the waste

4. Treatment of sulfide a major pollutant

5. Proposal for H2S monitoring. in the ambient air

6. VOC monitoring should be proposed 7. Revised waste water flow diagram should be submitted

8. A possible maximum waste water recycle should be done.


of 48

9. Impact analysis with regard to odor and mitigation measures proposed 10. Complete details of STP/CET

11. Proposed green belt area has to be kept min. 21% of the total land and a detailed lay out of the same shall be submitted.

In the above context the project proponent submitted the reply/information vide his letter

dated 13-08-2014. The reply was considered in the meeting. During the meeting the project

Proponent also submitted the copy of letter dated 30-08-2014 addressed to Managing

director, UPSIDC, Kanpur regarding the Mega leather cluster Development (U.P) Ltd.

Through this letter the project proponent has submitted that “Reference is made to your letter

No. 696 dtd. 26.08.2014. In this connection we would like to inform you that we have already

paid the land cost by two parts i.e. Rs. 8,00,00.0Q0A & Rs. 6,03,47,287/- totalling to Rs. 14,03,48,455/- against our letter dated 25.08.2014.

Though our letter dated 28.08.2014 we had updoted you that we can purchase the private lands directly from the farmers instead of acquiring the same from the farmers by

UPSIDC. Therefore we request you to kindly withdraw your acquisition letter so that we can initiate the purchasing of land.

In regard to your charges @12.5% amounting to Rs. 1,75,43,569/- it was already decided in the meeting that the payment will be made only after the awarding the possession.

Therefore we request you to kindly bear with us. In regard to the replacement of land, we would like to inform you that we are In the

discussion on the purchase of alternate land with farmers for the replacement and shall

confirm you the readiness as soon as the discussion is matured.” Along with same letter a

copy of ADM (F/R) Kanpur nagar letter no- 1066/DLRC/2014-14 dated, 20-08-2014 on

the subject tuin dkuiqj uxj es esxk ysnj DyLVj dh LFkkiuk gsrq xzke&dqjkSuk cgknqj uxj o eaxjklk dh xzke lHkk dh LkkekU; Hkwfe ds iqukxzg.k ds lEcU/k es addressed to Managing

Director, UPSIDC, Lakhanpur, Kanpur was also submitted.

In the above reference the SEAC concluded that the Gram Samaj land is being

proposed for the development of Mega Leather Cluster. Therefore, as per the EIA

notification 14 Sep 2006 the matter falls under category-A i.e the procedure of Environmental Clearance to the project proposal does not come under the ambit of

SEIAA, U.P. The project proponent is directed to proceed to the MoEF for the Environmental Clearance of the proposed proposal.

16- “Inner Ring Road Section from Kuberpur to Fatehabad Road, Vill-Kuberpur,

Rahankalan, Raipur, Etmadpur Madra, Mahuakhera, Bamrauli, Katara & Budera

Agra. File No. 2436/AD(Sub)

The matter was considered in the meeting and the SEAC noted that as per EIA

notification 14 Sep. 2006 only state highway Project proposal are covered under

category- B. The project proponent should be asked to clarify why the title project

proposal is being proposed for Environmental Clearance.

17- Engine based power production manu. Unit M/s Honda Siel Power Products, at Plot

No-5, Sector-41, Kasna, Greater Noida. File No. 2389/DD(Y)


of 48

A presentation was made by the project proponent and along with their consultant M/s

Perfact Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the

presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Engine based power production manu. Unit

at Plot No-5, Sector-41, Kasna, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Honda Siel Power Products.


Description Existing (Sqm) Proposed (Sqm) Total (Sqm)

Plot Area 101247.2 101247.2 101247.2

G.C (Per) (50%) 50623.57 - 50623.57

G.C (Ach) (32.7 %) 33124.42 14866.86 47991.29

F.A.R (Per) (60%) 60748.29 - 60748.29

F.A.R (Ach) (33.53 %) 33945.78 15246.59 49192.37

Built up Area 33945.78 15246.59 49192.37

Open Area

(Total Plot Area-

Permissible G.C)

38566.36 SQM 38566.36 –

16803.8 sqm

21762.56 sqm

Green Area 25311.78 462.22 25774

Surface Parking Area 4244.64 sqm 1474.72 sqm 5719.36 sqm

No. of Floors G+1 G+1 G+1

No. of Block 20 1 21

Height of building 12.5 m 12.5 m 12.5 m

No. of Rain water

Harvesting collection tanks with pit

6 5 11

Office & Maintenance Staff

792 168 960

Visitors 40 0 40 TOTAL POPULATION 832 168 1000 Total Power load (KVA) 1000 KVA, 1x 1.1MW

gas generator 500 KVA 1500 KVA, 1x 1.1MW

gas generator No. of DG sets 1 x 1000 (KVA)

2 x 500 (KVA) 1 x 250 (KVA)

2 x 1000 (KVA)

1 x 125 (KVA) 3 x 1000 (KVA)

2 x 500 (KVA) 1 x 250 (KVA)

1 x 125 (KVA) Parking required 229 ECS

3. Raw material and its daily consumption details of the are as follows:

S.No. Process Raw Material Daily Consumption

1. Press Shop Extra deep drawing quality sheet 4.0 MT

2. Alternator Shop Copper wire 1.3 MT

Coil Varnish 0.2 MT

3. Paint Shop Paints 0.2 MT

Thinner 0.1 MT

4. Die Casting Aluminum Ingot 6.0 MT

5. Others Oil (Lubricant) 40 liters

Grease 0.01 MT


of 48

4. Water requirement of the project is as follows:

PROCESS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL

Water

Requirement

(Kld)

Waste

Water

Generation

(Kld)

Water

Requirement

(Kld)

Waste

Water

Generation

(Kld)

Water

Requirement

(Kld)

Waste

Water

Generati

on

(Kld)

Industrial Process 50 35 65 45 115 80

Cooling 48 0.3 252 1.4 300 1.7

Boiler Feed 6 0.1 8 0.2 14 0.3

Washing 15 15 19 19 34 34

Domestic Drinkin

g

50 40 66 53 117 94

Flushing 60 60 78 78 138 138

Gardening 100 nil 0 0 100 0

Total 329 KLD 150.4 KLD 488 KLD 196.6 KLD 817 KLD 348

KLD

STP-150 KLD,ETP-75 KLD STP- 150 KLD, ETP-75 KLD 2 ETP- 75 KLD and 75

KLD

2 STP- 150 KLD, 150

KLD

5. Water management details are as follows:

Source of Water Bore Wells at the site Total Water Requirement 817 KLD

Net Fresh Water Requirement 254 KLD Total Wastewater Discharge 348 KLD

STP Capacity Existing Proposed 150 KLD 150 KLD

ETP Capacity 75 KLD 75 KLD

6. Municipal solid waste generation details is as follows:

SOLID WASTE GENERATION Population MSW IN KG/DAY

Office & Maintenance Staff 960 144

Visitors 40 6

Total 1000 150 KG/DAY

7. Hazardous waste details of the project is as follows:

Hazardous waste

generated

Existing Proposed Total

1) Paint Sludge 9.1 tons/year 12.9 tons/year 22.8 tons/year

1) ETP sludge 17.1 tons/year 19.3 tons/ year 36.4 tons/year

1) Phosphating

Sludge

0.62 ton/year 0.6 tons/year 1.22 ton/year

Electronic Waste Black with

Label/

Hazardous

It is being given to approved

vender of SPCB as per

Electronic Wastes (Management/

40 KG/

Month


of 48

Waste Handling) Rules, 2011 effective

from 01-05-2012

The committee discussed the matter and directed that following

information/clarification should be sought from proponent:

1. Process details.

2. List of finished products and steps involved.

3. Why the application should not be treated under category 3"a" while the proposal

includes establishment of 02 MCH furnaces and 02 Paintshop ovens also.

In this regard the project proponent has submitted his reply through letter dated 18-

09-2014 & informed that since the 3500 TPA of the Aluminium is being processed which is

less than 5000 TPA therefore, the project is not covered under scheduled under 3A of EIA

notification 2006.The SEAC discussed the matter and granted the Environmental Clearance

only to the construction project along with general conditions as prescribed by the Authority

(Annxure-1) for the construction projects and following specific conditions:

1. Before starting the construction, the Byelaws of concerned authority shall be submitted to SEIAA.

2. Before starting the construction the plans should be approved by the competent authority.

3. Permission from the competent authority to drain out waste water to municipal drain shall be submitted.

4. Undertaking shall be provided for installing modular STP along with details.

5. Installing online water quality monitoring devices with recycled water line along with

flow measuring device.

6. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from



the premises.

8. STP to be installed and treated water should be used for construction phase.

9. STP drawing design and cost estimate has to be submitted within 03 months from

issuance of the Environmental Clearance.

10. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more

capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be





users.





14. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of total project profit shall be submitted (within the month) on need




of 48

water harvesting provisions in nearby areas, development of fodder farm, fruit bearing orchards, vocational training etc. In addition, vocational training for individuals shall be

imparted so that poor section of society can take up self-employment and jobs. Separate budget for community development activities and income generating programmers shall

be specified. 15. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided.












23. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

24. Wheel wash arrangement is to be made at exit point during construction phase. 25. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.

26. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities. 27. Parking for disabled persons should be explored.



30. Dual plumbing should be adopted.

31. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be

restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.

32. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any

buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.





construction. 36. Cement Bags should be used for road making.

37. LIG & EWS housing to be provided as per U.P Govt. Orders and building bye laws i.e. 10% for LIG and 10% for MI G.

38. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored. 39. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose. Fresh Water will only used for





of 48

18- Comercial Complex “The Tempean” at plot No- C-171/1, Sector-15, Noida, G B

Nagar, U.P Sri Roop Mohan, M.D., D-13, Defence Colony, New Delhi. File No.

1800/OSD(T)

The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in 180th

SEAC meeting dated 06/06/2014 wherein the project proponents were directed to submit following information:

1. Approved plan for building, structural design, proposed services, drainage and greens.

2. Justification regarding difference in area statements as given in application for

environmental clearance and Noida Authority letter no. 693 dated 06/09/2013.

3. Copy of submission of charges to Noida Authority regarding EDC, IDC.

4. Status of project in view of its proximity to Kalindi Bird Sanctuary.

5. Water requirement for fire fighting and its management should be specifically

mentioned.

The project proponents submitted their replies through undated letter received in the

Directorate dated 25/08/2014. The project proponent submitted plans for building structural

design proposed services, drainage and greens.

PP has got approval for the building plans vide letter no. 1341/693, in which, total sanctioned

built up area is 1,53,943.856 m2

but the built up area applied for the Environmental

Clearance was 1,48,896.06 m2

. However, the total deduction area amounts to 5,047.80 m2

from commercial and parking area. An Affidavit stating that the built up area will not exceed

148896.056 m2 was enclosed with reply.

Further, it is ensured that in future any construction will be undertaken beyond 1, 48,896.056

m2 area; separate Environmental clearance will be obtained by SEIAA, UP as an expansion of

the earlier. The project proponent undated letter submitted the reply as per the suggestion

dated 14-09-2014

A presentation was made by the representative of project proponent alongwith their

consultant M/s GRC India Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and

presentation made, informed the committee that:

Table 1: Area Statement

S. No. Particulars Area (in m2)

1 Total Plot Area 15205.75

2 Permissible Ground Coverage (50% of plot area) 7602.875

3 Proposed Ground Coverage (@ 49.85 % of total plot area) 7580.91

4 Permissible FAR (@5) 76028.75

5 Proposed FAR (@ 4.99) Proposed FAR of residential

Proposed FAR for Commercial

Proposed FAR for Retail

75946.73 19357.52

33011.41

23,577.80

6 Built Up Area 149130.654

7 Basement Area-I 5075.940

8 Basement Area -II 8208.070

9 Service Area 73183.924

10 Non FAR + services Area 69460.78


of 48

1. The water supply will be met through Noida development Authority. The total water

requirement is approx. 306 KLD (218 domestic, Fresh water 114 KLD).

2. 213 KLD waste water is proposed to be generated.

3. 1676 kgpd solid waste to be generated.

4. Power supply will be met through NPCL. 4X1000 KVA D.G. sets will used for

residential cum commercial supply.

5. 2007 ECS are proposed. The committee examined the documents as above and recommended grant of




to SEIAA.

2. Before starting the construction the plans should be approved by the competent


shall be submitted. 4. Undertaking shall be provided for installing modular STP along with details.

5. Installing online water quality monitoring devices with recycled water line along with flow measuring device.

6. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from National Board for Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not earmarked


the premises.

8. STP to be installed and treated water should be used for construction phase.

9. STP drawing design and cost estimate has to be submitted within 03 months from

issuance of the Environmental Clearance.

10. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more





be used in house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving to end users.

12. SWM organic converter drawing, design and cost estimate has to be submitted within 03 months from issuance of the Environmental Clearance

13. Approved site plan from authority to be submitted within 03 months from issuance of the Environmental Clearance.




water harvesting provisions in nearby areas, development of fodder farm, fruit bearing

orchards, vocational training etc. In addition, vocational training for individuals shall be

11 Open Area (50.14 % of plot area) 7,624.84

12 Landscape Area (@ 51.17 % of open area) 3901.786


of 48

imparted so that poor section of society can take up self-employment and jobs. Separate budget for community development activities and income generating programmers shall

be specified. 15. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided.


17. Parking guideline as per Noida authority should be followed. 18. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.









23. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP

to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

24. Wheel wash arrangement is to be made at exit point during construction phase. 25. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.

26. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities. 27. Parking for disabled persons should be explored.




restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.

32. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any

buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.





construction.


37. LIG & EWS housing to be provided as per Lucknow Nagar byelaws/letter of land allotment.

38. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored. 39. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose. Fresh Water will only used for





of 48

19- Sethi Venice Project at Plot No-SC-01/A-04, Sector-150, Noida, U.P. File no- 2096

DD(Y)

The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in 183rd SEAC meeting

dated 27/06/2014 wherein the project proponents were directed to submit following information:

1. Proposed TOR as the total built up area is above 150,000 sq mts. 2. Detailed scheme of STP and the water recycle system.

3. An under taking from the Municipal Authority for the water supply.

4. A separate map of the proposed green Belt should be provided.

5. A corrected water balance indicating the actual daily fresh water requirement. Also

provide the details of the utilities to be provided based on energy and the water

consumption.

The project proponents submitted their replies through letter dated 07/07/2014. A

presentation was made by the project proponent along with their consultant M/s Ascenso

Management and Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd.

The project proponent informed that the Form 1, Form 1a and conceptual plan was submitted on 11/10/2013 and the built up area was 1,86,451.0 m

2. But due to modification in

the design of the building, the built up area of the project has been changed to 1, 48,320.42 m2 and revised Form 1, Form 1a and conceptual plan with the data variation sheet has been

submitted on 20/03/2014.

The committee noted that the matter was discussed in SEAC meeting dated 14/09/2014. The committee directed that sanctioned copy of building plan with revised built-

up area should be submitted alongwith revised services plans. The committee also directed that civil construction for STP in the basement shall not be allowed. If, the project proponent

does not propose modular STP in basement, they should submit plans with specific locations

for STP on surface with civil structure. The committee also discussed decision dated

11/08/2014 of Hon'ble NGT regarding Sport City in sector-150, Noida (application no.

128/2014 Raghuveer Singh V/s Union of India and Ors.) which relates to matter of

construction on no development zone at the river bank in the interest of environment and

ecology. The committee directed that the project proponent should also submit a note

regarding their project location in view of above decision of Hon'ble NGT.

The project proponent through his letter dated 07-09-2014 submitted the reply in

regard to the information asked by the SEAC in its meeting dated 14-09-2014.A presentation

was made by the representative of the project proponent along with their consultant M/s

Ascenso Management and Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponents informed the Committee through the documents submitted and the presentation made that:-

1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Group Housing Project "Sethi Venice" at

Plot No. SC-01/A-04, Sector-150, Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. M/s Esthetic

Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. 2. Area Details of the project are as follows:

S.N. Particulars Area in SQM

1. Total Plot Area 56,652.50


of 48

2. Permissible Ground Coverage @ 30% of plot area 16,995.60

3. Achieved Ground Coverage @ 20.9% of plot area 11,844.00

4. Permissible FAR @ 1.5 of plot area 90,000.00

5. Proposed FAR @1.5 of plot area Residential FAR

Convenient shopping FAR Club House FAR

School FAR

90,000.00 85,742.00

2,400.00 929.00

929.00

6. Open Area( plot area - achieved ground coverage) 44,808.00

7. Landscape are required@50% of open area 22,404.00

8. Landscape are [email protected]% of open area 38,608.00

9. Basement area 49,105.00

10. Stilt area 9,144.00

11. Service area (Lift, Lobbies, Balcony, Stair cases) 37,702.00

12. services at roof (Mumty and machine) 500.00

13. Total Non FAR 96,451.00

14. Roads area 6,200.00

15. Built up area 1,86,451.00

3. 16 nos. of floors and 648 nos. of dwelling units are proposed to the project.

4. Parking facility is proposed for 1300 ECS.

5. The total water requirement is proposed as 354 KLD which will be sourced from

Municipal Supply. Total fresh water requirement is proposed 216 KLD.

6. The total waste water generation is proposed as 269 KLD. The waste water will be

treated up to STP of 330 KLD capacity.

7. Total power requirement is proposed as 11,530 KVA which will be sourced from

Paschimanchal Vibyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.

8. 08 nos. of DG Set of total capacity of 10,000 KVA (4x1500+4x1000 KVA) are proposed for power back up.

9. Total green area of the proposed project is 11,824.875 m2.

10. Quantity of MSW to be generated is proposed is 1,865.35 kg/day.

11. The proposed number of rain water harvesting pits 13 will be provided. 12. The Project proposal falls under category 8"b" of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended). The committee examined the documents as above and recommended grant of




to SEIAA. 2. Before starting the construction the plans should be approved by the competent


shall be submitted. 4. Undertaking shall be provided for installing modular STP along with details.

5. Installing online water quality monitoring devices with recycled water line along with flow measuring device.


of 48

6. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from National Board for Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not earmarked

7. Adequate green cover not less than 33% of the plotted area should be provided within the premises.

8. STP to be installed and treated water should be used for construction phase. 9. STP drawing design and cost estimate has to be submitted within 03 months from

issuance of the Environmental Clearance. 10. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more






users.







people identified. The programme can include activities such as old age homes, rain water harvesting provisions in nearby areas, development of fodder farm, fruit bearing

orchards, vocational training etc. In addition, vocational training for individuals shall be imparted so that poor section of society can take up self-employment and jobs. Separate

budget for community development activities and income generating programmers shall be specified.

15. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided.

16. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. Solar light is to be provided in

the open areas with 50% of them may be with dual power.








permission from CGWB. 22. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets

capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building. 23. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP

to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines. 24. Wheel wash arrangement is to be made at exit point during construction phase.

25. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase. 26. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities.

27. Parking for disabled persons should be explored. 28. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of

residents.


of 48









construction.


37. LIG & EWS housing to be provided as per Lucknow Nagar byelaws/letter of land

allotment.






20- Group Housing locacted at GH-01/26A/TS-01, Sec-26A, Yamuna Expressway,

Greater Noida, U.P. File no- 2117 JDCA(S)

The matter was put up in the meeting but the respective file could not put up in the

meeting. The SEAC directed that the matter is to be put up in coming SEAC meeting along

with the file.

21- Sand /Morum Mining Project at Arazi N0- 01, 02, Khand-2, Vill-Pura Ganesh,

Tehsil-Sakaldiha, Distt-Chandauli (Leased Area 4.04 Hac) File no- 2182 DD(Y)

The matter was considered in the meeting. The SEAC directed that as the legal

opinion is seeked from law department, UPPCB regarding the writ petition no- 40980 /2014.

Therefore, the matter shall be considered after receipt of the legal opinion from the UPPCB.

(Dr. M. S. Khan)

Chairman, SEAC,UP

(Shri S. C. Brahmachari)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. S.N. Singh)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. D. C. Gupta)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. S.K. Upadhayay)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. R.K. Sardana)

Secretary, SEAC, UP

rd SEAC Meeting Date: 07/10/2014 -...

Documents

Transcript of rd SEAC Meeting Date: 07/10/2014 -...