Rapid Response Team

ASSESSMENT / VERIFICATION REPORT

ASSESSMENT: (X) VERIFICATION: (tick) Report Date: 15/9/2014 Assessment/Verification date(s): 4/9/2014 till 11/9/2014 Location Information State Jonglei County Ayod Payam Mogok Boma Mogok center GPS Coordinates N 08 24’ 48. 28” E 031 20’ 3.37” Team Details Name Organisation Title Contacts: Email/Mobile/Sat

Phone Hail Alashawe IOM Operation Officer halashawe@iom.int Andres Cruz IOM WASH Officer acruz@iom.int Emma Khakula IOM DTM Officer ekhakula@iom.int Kathryn Newberg IOM Operation Officer knewberg@iom.int Joseph Adiomo IOM NFI Assistant jadiomo@iom.int Darlati w. Lagu IOM WASH Engineer wdraleti@iom.int Key Contacts: Mogok Payam Name Organisation Title Contacts: Email/Mobile/Sat

Phone Samson Nhias Chano RRC Field Supervisor n/a Michael Mayiet RRC Assistant Supervisor n/a Jacob Bol Ter RRC Member n/a Moses Chuol Gattnor ----- Community Health Worker n/a Samuel Gatmai Tudeal ------ Clinical Officer n/a James Mawic Commissioner, Mogok

Payam 008821644419068

Simon Dak Nyuan n/a Payam Head Chief n/a Stephen Matai Tubel n/a Thuop boma – Chief n/a Paul Gatchin Rial n/a Haat boma – Chief n/a Father Michael and father Antonio

Comboni missionary

n/a n/a

Former NGOs Response in Mogok Medix WASH/boreholes (2004-2005) Carter Centre Eradication of Guinea worm (2005-2011) NPA Seeds and tools (2006-2012) Peacewind Japan WASH/boreholes PAH WASH (2011-2013) PSI Malaria campaign and distribution of 15,000 mosquito nets Summary of Population Type / Numbers

A. Total population resident in area -Ref Census to County level

Mogok Payam is made up of 5 Boma’s and 42 Villages The population in the five Bomas is as follows:

• Thuop Boma (7,600 IDP’s) • Haat Boma (6,300 IDP’s) • Kandak Boma (6,400 IDP’s) • Korwai Boma (6,750 IDP’s) • Pakuem Boma (5,950 IDP’s).

33,000 (IDPs and Host Community ) 4,716 Households

B. Total number of IDPs/returnees -Households and individuals -Ref sources - can be multiple -Specify conflict IDP, disaster IDP, returnee -If returnee, in transit, stranded, or final destination? Organised or spontaneous? -Do registration list/s already exist? Made by whom?

20,000 IDPs / 2,857 Households 13,000 Host Community /1859 Households The influx of IDPs was caused by fighting between Government side and the Sudan People Liberation Movement in Opposition in Ayod Town in July 2014 Many of the IDPs came to Mogok from Ayod County which is an administrative area in Jonglei state, South Sudan, with headquarters in Ayod Others IDPs came from Bentiu, Malakal, Bor, and currently reside in the various Bomas around Mogok Payam and it’s Bomas Registration of both IDPs and Host Community was carried out by WFP in July 2014

C. Total number in need of shelter/NFI assistance -Households and individuals -Specify population type (IDP, returnee, host community) -Verified? List available?

No urgent needs identified for shelter/NFI assistance IDPs, no any verified list available.

Situation Overview -Note any prior assessments (eg IRNA) and attach to this report -If no prior assessment has been done. summarise information gathered through questionnaire at Annex 1

- Mogok is a leading Payam in Ayod County and has 5 bomas namely Thuop, Haat, Kandak, Korwai and Pakuem.

These Bomas have a total of 42 villages. The Commissioners office and administration will soon be moving to Mogok from Jiech to position Mogok Payam as the primary center for humanitarian access and central control of Ayod County. The team accommodated in NPA former compound it’s 50 meters far from the airstrip.

- Mogok Payam is under opposition forces control; however, the team observed a light military presence and civil authority is controlling Mogok. Mogok center is secure and there was no sign of a present fight in the area. But there was one incident of gun shooting close to the IOM hosted compound which was resolved the next day by the commissioner. The team had planned to visit Thuop Boma on the third day of the assessment but were not able to do so due to a security advisory by the Commissioner to stay in Mogok center and cover villages with distance of 30 minutes – 1 hour footing.

- There had been no prior assessment (in-crisis) conducted in Mogok; therefore, the team did not have any substantial secondary data to use as a starting point in our assessment. The area covered by the team in the assessment was limited to Mogok center as the team couldn’t travel beyond due to security reasons. The target of the assessment was the IDP’s with the host community. IDP’s were mostly sharing the Tukuls with the host community; some of them had constructed their own Tukuls or rehabilitated abandoned Tukuls as they planned to stay in Mogok for protection reasons.

- The IDP’s seemed to have a good relationship with the host community; they share food, shelter, water sources,

tools, equipment and other household material. They feel safe and are not planning to go back to their homes until there is peace.

- WFP conducted a food distribution in July for 33,000 individuals; they covered both IDP’s and the host community.

They have 3 rub halls in Mogok center that were built two years ago and use them only when they have a food distribution. Otherwise, the rub halls remain empty.

- Mogok center has a market, though it’s not very active due to the conflict. Many of the stalls were closed for

business. Traders said that merchants used to come to Mogok from Sudan and supply them with goods but they stopped due to the conflict. The residents now have to walk to Akobo at the Ethiopian border to get the items for trade. This is however very difficult to accomplish in the rainy season. The main items in the market were dry fish, sugar, salt, clothes, and very few medicines mainly for livestock and malaria. 60 grams of soap sells for 30ssp (equal to one small piece of soap); dry fish strand 20ssp; Quinine (small bottle) 80ssp and salt (small plastic bag) 25ssp. The prices represent nearly a 30-50% increase prior to the crisis.

- There is one health clinic in Mogok center that was built by the Arabs a long time ago and has since closed down

because they ran out of medicine. RRC said that there are two midwives, one clinical officer, four community health workers and one Traditional Birth Attendant in Mogok center. All of the health personnel were provided training, a few years ago, by Medair. The clinic will re-open once they receive support. The community was expecting Comitato di coordinamento delle Organizzazioni per il Servizio Volontario (COSV) to come and support in the next couple of days, they said that COSV came to Mogok only once last year and they have never seen them after that. The high priority medicines needed are maternity kits, eye medicine (glaucoma, tropical eye diseases etc), oral drugs; malaria meds, diarrhea meds and dressing kits. Prevalent diseases are brucellus; TB; Thyphoid; eye diseases, pneumonia (under 5) and malaria.

In total, there are approximately 17 Primary Care Centers (PCC) and 40-50 Primary Care Units (PCU) in Ayod County. Most are believed to be closed due to lack of medicine and health support. The closest functioning hospital is located in Lankien (supported by MSF).

- There is one primary school in Mogok center that was built by the government before the crisis. The school

(grades 1-8) operates two shifts; the morning shift is ran by the Catholic Church Mission (Comboni) and has 140 pupils registered, the team observed that only 70 were in attendance. The afternoon shift which is Government ran has 249 registered pupils but many of the students do not show up, as the team observed only 140 pupils attending the afternoon shift. The school is lacking chairs, tables, note books, chalk and many other school

materials. The teachers who work for Catholic school program are paid a stipend, while the teachers who work for the government are non-paid. There are no secondary schools.

- The team interviewed an American Catholic missionary, Father Michael, living in Mogok center. He said that he

travelled with approximately 2,000 IDP’s from Ayod town when the government attacked it. They went first to a village called Juin stayed for a month and then they all travelled to Mogok and during that time some IDP’s went back to their homes and brought their luggage, this is something the team confirmed through observation of big suitcases in so many IDP houses. The missionary teaches primary school in the morning shift and provides church services each Sunday. There is also a Presbyterian Church located in Mogok, regularly attended by the locals.

- The team also interviewed Chiefs from Mogok Payam, Haat Boma, and Thuop Boma. The Payam head Chief said

that there are 33,000 IDP’s in 5 bomas, prioritizing them from the most affected to the least: • Thuop Boma (7,600 IDP’s) • Haat Boma (6,300 IDP’s) • Kandak Boma (6,400 IDP’s) • Korwai Boma (6,750 IDP’s) • Pakuem Boma (5,950 IDP’s).

The team planned to visit Thuop but couldn’t do it due to security reasons. The chief prioritize the needs of Mogok Payam with food to be the number one priority, health to be number two, and NFI items to be number three.

- Chief of Haat Boma said that there are 6,300 IDP’s with average between 8-12 people in one house many of them came from Malakal by boat and most of them are female headed household. The IDPs are staying with the host community and the relationship between them is good. A flood hit the area recently, destroyed the crops, left many people without shelter, and caused a wide Malaria infection with no health clinic in town. The people of Haat are now getting food through hunting and fishing and need to be supported with fishing gear. WFP did a food distribution in April but after the flood crops were destroyed during the flood and there is lack of food at the moment. There are three boreholes; two functioning, one broken, and no latrines. There is an airstrip in Haat that can support landing for both choppers and fixed wing planes. The Chief prioritized the area needs with NFI’s being the most needed followed by fishing gear, health and wash.

- The Chief of Thuop Boma said that most of the IDP’s in Mogok Payam are now in Thuop Boma because it is the first

line after Ayod town. IDP’s started to arrive in January 2014 and now there is 7,300 IDP’s scattered within 17 villages. There are two boreholes in Thuop, one broken and one functioning, people are drinking the water without filtering, and they don’t have latrines. The chief prioritized health as the number one need for Thuop Boma, followed by shelter, and lastly wash.

We were unable to verify information provided by the Chief’s regarding the boma’s mentioned above. Therefore, a follow up assessment is recommended for verification of needs in Haat, Kandak and, if accessible, Thoupe. WFP has identified Haat and Kandak as a high priority for food assistance. -

Meeting with community leaders Meeting with community leaders

Meeting with community Meeting with community

Mogok Center Mogok Center

Construction in Mogok Construction in Mogok

Meeting with community Meeting with community

Mogok School Mogok Clinic

Summary of DTM findings -Summarise information gathered through DTM questionnaire at Annex -Include maps and photographs where relevant - Include any information gathered on community and intra-household gender dynamics, as related to DTM The verification process was carried out using a DTM questionnaire that had a broad spectrum of questions encompassing Shelter/NFI, Wash, health, Education, Protection amongst others The team carried out 21 interviews, 5 focus group discussions that ensured a comprehensive representation of the population. The interviews covered male/female IDPs, Elderly, Health practitioners, Church clergy, fishermen, traders, chiefs, teachers, host families Ngo workers, RRC and the area commissioner. Observations were made/conducted around the community with focus on community shelters, IDP shelters, Schools, Health facilities, Administrative coverage, water sources, market, family structures, traditions, cultural norms, The questions asked were geared towards collecting as much situation information as possible. The details have been further elaborated upon in the larger assessment findings by NFI/shelter and Wash; The Persons interviewed during the assessment/verification comprised of the Commissioner, Payam Chief, Boma Chiefs, Villagers, and IDPs, name of site used, teachers, and State, County, Boma, Payam & Villages. There is strong leadership at community and administrative level. The area has a commissioner, Payam Chief, Boma Chiefs and Village Chiefs. The Commissioner regularly visits the Payam, Boma’s and Villages to support the local administration. He travelled 7 hours on foot from Kandak Boma to Mogok to meet with the assessment team. The community has support groups, the men and women have groups that meet to discuss community issues.

There are no site management agencies in Mogok as the IDPs live within the host community and not in a designated site. There have been a couple of NGOs that have worked in Mogok in the past but stopped their

activities. The most recent agency activity in Mogok was a WFP food distribution in July.

Land ownership in Mogok and across the Bomas is ancestral. The community together with the chief’s agree on where one can settle, construct shelter and cultivate land. The same system is used for the IDPs, the community has allowed them to settle within the local population although now that resources are getting stretched they would rather have the IDPs in a separate site within the town.

The Demography of Mogok town and other Bomas the population is made up of 13000 H/C, 18000 IDPs, the population growth has been due to an influx of IDPs into the county. The population distribution and density is around the towns, bomas and villages. It was reported that there had been 50 births and 30 deaths (15 gunshot wounds, 5 deaths of 0-5years and 2 adults). There is no formal registry for marriages as they are traditional. The most common diseases are malaria, waterborne diseases and measles.

Registration was carried out in July by WFP in preparation for a food distribution. It is speculated that quite a number of outsiders may have taken advantage of the food distribution, as it is the population of Mogok town is 300 which makes it difficult to corroborate the actual figure across the Payam and Bomas. WFP has 3 large rub halls (N 08.24.13.13; E031.20.16.84,) the food was brought by air to a local airstrip (N 08.24.48.28; E031.20.19.10) Before displacement the IDPs came from Ayod Town, Malakal, Bentiu and the surrounding areas. The IDPs are willing to return to their homes once it is peaceful enough.

Health an area that should be given priority. There is a clinic that is closed due to lack of drugs, the Payam and its Bomas have qualified health personnel but without drugs they are not able to cater to the health problems in their Bomas. The most common problems are Malaria, Measles, Malnutrition, Diarrhea, Eye infections amongst others. For community health workers to be effective there needs to be a functioning health post that supports their efforts in sensitizing the community on health issues. The local shelters (Tukuls) are well constructed and are made of mud walls and grass thatch. IDPs live within the host community in H/C houses or rehabilitated homes that have been abandoned by the locals. The community has a lot of natural shelter material; the forests around Mogok provide poles and grass for construction. It would be a disservice to introduce plastic sheeting to the community as they have a great coping mechanism. The community expressed need for NFIs especially kitchen sets, mosquito nets The water sources in the Payam are either from borehole, rivers or pools. The Boma borehole breakdown is as follows; Mogok Town - 4 working 1 broken; Thuop – 1 working, 1 broken; Haat – 2 working, 1 broken; Kandak – 0 boreholes; Korwai – 0 boreholes; Pakuem – 0 boreholes. Mogok town has 2 latrines while the other Bomas have none. The people of Mogok town and the other Bomas are very traditional in their Food & Nutrition habits. They eat a staple food made out Sorghum and milk, they hardly eat meat because of the value attached to livestock, according to the health workers this makes it very difficult for women to wean children into a healthy diet due to limited varieties of food, as such malnutrition is common across the five (5) Bomas in the Payam.

The livelihood activities comprise of raring cattle and goats, growing sorghum and maize and small businesses. The community expressed need for hoes, axes, machetes and fishing nets. They do not seem to venture out of their traditional foods even though the soil is fertile and viable for other types of crops. They have been sharing their tools and equipment which makes it hard for both IDPs and the H/C to effectively go about their activities.

There is one school in Mogok town. The school has two shifts, Catholic School in the morning and government school in the afternoon (N 08. 24’. 19.74; E031.20’.15.72) The other Bomas conduct school under the trees and follow the government curriculum. Haat Boma however has had to close down its school due to flooding. The schools have the following number of teachers; Mogok Town – 18 teachers (17 male & 1 female); Haat – 13 male teachers; Thuop - 12 male teachers; School

The general protection issues highlighted were around the distances women had to cover during food distribution, collection of firewood and purchase of food during in other villages when food stocks were depleted in their villages. Some women walked as far as eight hours in one direction to look for food. The IDPs receive public Information through the administration, word of mouth and through the Radio. The general feeling about Mogok town is that the situation was not an emergency. Some Health and Wash Intervention are needed. The areas that seem to have more needs are Haat and Kandak Bomas. We recommend that these areas be assed, especially Haat Boma which has been greatly affected by heavy flooding which has destroyed housing.

Livestock Dried Fish & text books - the market IDP constructing shelter

WFP Rub Halls Small Business Interview – IDP family

Pumpkin & Corn patch Magok town airstrip One of the homes hosting IDPs

Water Lilies – source of food Magok town market IDP children outside their shelter

Summary of Shelter/NFI Situation -Summarise information gathered through questionnaire at Annex 2 -Include maps and photographs where relevant - Include any information gathered on community and intra-household gender dynamics, as related to shelter and NFI Mogok Center is where the team largely conducted our assessments due to the access restrictions imposed by the Commissioner, which limited the team to regions just beyond the center (within 1 hour reach by footing). Unfortunately, this restriction did not allow the team to assess five key areas identified by the Payam Chief: Thoupe; Haat; Kandak; Korwai and Pakuem. According to the Chief, it is in these boma’s where the largest numbers of IDPs have settled; WASH, food, shelter and health support are in high demand. The team designed our own set of questions (see attached); conducted HH interviews (including spot checks inside each tukul, by permission of HH); focus group discussions (separate male/female); separate Host and IDP group discussions; key informants and general observation. Overtime, we began to see a similar trend of needs – Health (medicine/health support) and WASH (borehole issues – water is available but difficult to retrieve / lack of family latrines / hygiene kit). It was clear to the team that Mogok is a community steep in cultural practices evident by the coping mechanisms put in place… from shelter construction to sharing of resources such as cooking pots, food and land for IDPs to plant crops and/or build their own shelter. There is a relatively low number of people living in Mogok, approximately 300 individuals, so they been able to assist one another with the resources shared across many families.

SHELTER: Local materials are used for shelter construction such as…

• Palm tree branches for fencing • Grass is being harvested and dried for roofing • Local poles for framing of the shelter with mosquito nets used as ties (the treated nets keeps away the

termites) • Mud walls are typical in the design of each shelter • WFP sacks are used as doors and/or sleeping mats

There is NO plastic sheeting anywhere within this community. It is simply not needed, nor recommended. Shelter assistance, while requested by the community, is not an urgent need as observed by the team. The average number of individuals (IDPs/Host) living in each shelter is 7-12 persons. They are crowded at night time and now during the rainy season. The men typically sleep outside and therefore are given the mosquito nets. While the congested living arrangement has caused a strain on a few families, the community has managed to get along and cope with the increased numbers within their homes. Upon dry season, IDPs will be building their own shelter when dry grass is available. PRIORITIES: requested by community/IDP members

• Medical (medicine and health support) • Shelter • WASH: borehole fixes; soap, jerry cans, buckets, pur and hygiene education • Cooking Sets • Tools for harvest and shelter construction

Mosquito nets were requested by a few HHs – however it was noted that each shelter had at least one

mosquito net. PSI conducted a distribution of mosquito nets for 15,000 HH back in 2013. While the communities have needs for the above mentioned items, they have found a way to share and/or use local materials and have gotten by thus far. Therefore the team did not identify an urgent need for a NFI/Shelter response RECOMMENDATION: WASH and Health response and intervention. Summary of WASH In the Visit to Mogok, from the initial day the community says that they don’t have conflict in the last 3 months which is important since they are located on the main road linking Malakal to Juba and has been used as a main road for the displacement of communities POCs of these cities. As for water and sanitation issues in the community manifest central Mogok have seven boreholes and are only running three, They defecate in the open field but some of the houses have latrines that work in an archaic manner by the same family, in the same way with the showers. As for hygiene promotion they have the personal to do this job and the culture to do it, but do not have enough supplies for the continuity of a hygiene promotion program.

Borehole Mogok Borehole Mogok

Borehole Mogok Letrina Mogok

Shower Mogok Borehole Mogok

Borehole Mogok Borehole Mogok

BOMA IDPs HOST (Aprox) TOTAL BOREHOLE LATRINE SHOWER HYGIENE PROMOTION

Thuop 7600 8360 15960 2 0 0 0

Haat 6300 6930 13230 3 0 0 0

Kandak 6400 7040 13440 0 0 0 0

Korwai 6750 7425 14175 0 0 0 0 Pakuem 5950 6545 12495 0 0 0 0

Total 33000 36300 69300 0 0 0 0

Note:

1. Host community take 10% more than IDPs, Community leaders 2. Facts taken by the team in meeting with community leaders 3. Mogok center has 5 Boreholes but 1 is broken

Assessment/Verification Methodology -Which assessment/verification methods did you use and why (eg household interview, focus group discussion, shelter observation inside and out, market survey) -If verifying, are you working from an existing list, or are you creating a list from scratch? -How many interviews/FGDs/observations did you conduct? What questions did you ask and why? -Did you use sampling techniques? If so, please describe. -Is there any information you feel less confident about? If so why? The team used the following methods for assessment/verification:

• HH Interviews: IDP and Host

• Focus group discussions: Five (5) focus group discussions were conducted during the assessment period. The groups involved comprised of;

1. Local Authorities (leaders) 2. Leaders & Women from both IDP and Host Community 3. Men from the IDP & Host Communities 4. Women form the IDP population 5. Women from the Host Community

The feedback from the discussions were that the community needed cooking kits, kits habitable accommodation and medicine. All this is because they are sharing the same amongst the community. The similarly requested support in the construction of new housing or relocation of IDPs to a designated site since they are sleeping up to 17 people in one house.

Shelter Observation: daily living, shelter constructions activities, schools and spot checks of HH tukuls (inside and outside)

• Market Survey: to understand livelihoods activities, pricing and availability of items

• Key Informants: RRC, Leaders, Chiefs, teachers, religious leaders

The team carried out 21 interviews that ensured a comprehensive representation of the population. The interviews covered male/female IDPs, Elderly, Health practitioners, Church clergy, fishermen, traders, chiefs, teachers, host families Ngo workers, RRC and the area commissioner. The questions asked were around the areas named below and were geared towards collecting as much situation information as possible. A Stratified sampling technique was used because the population being assessed/verified embraced a number of distinct categories, which made up separate "strata" that were then sampled as an independent sub-population, out of which individual elements were randomly selected. Adequate representation of minority subgroups of interest were ensured by stratification & varying sampling fraction between strata as required.

RECOMMENDATIONS

If emergency shelter and/or NFI distribution is recommended: N/A Define targeting criteria -need/vulnerability (if vulnerability, define vulnerability categories)

Intervention in Health and wash (latrines and hygiene promotion)

Specify items to be distributed -Number and type per household - NFI/ES, full kits, loose items -Specify if quantity of items distributed will vary by household size

n/a

Key considerations for distribution -Eg access, logistics, security and protection concerns, push/pull, stakeholders/partners to work with

n/a

If emergency shelter and/or NFI distribution is not recommended: Summarise reasons and propose next steps, if any -eg referral to other clusters

WASH and Health intervention is recommended

NENEXT STEPSXT STEPS

Immediate next steps Timeline Who is responsible

WASH Health

Please submit to IOM Juba (cc your Shelter and NFI Cluster State Focal Point)

If this is a verification report, and distribution is recommended, include:

1. Completed Pipeline Request Form 2. Distribution List in excel format

Annexes: Annex 1: Example questionnaire on general situation Annex 2: Example questionnaire on shelter/NFI need ANNEX 1 General Situation Questionnaire

GI.1 Type of assessment site

Spontaneous Settlement of IDPs in an urban area Spontaneous Settlement of IDPs in a rural area Affected area (affected by conflict incident or natural disaster) IDPs on the move (site where IDP’s are transitioning to another site) IDPs living with host families in urban area IDPs living with host families in rural area Area of origin for returnees Returnee transit site/way station Other (please specify)

GI.2 At the assessment site what kind of population is residing

Population directly affected by conflict or disaster (either wounded/killed or targeted due to violence)

IDPs directly affected by conflict or disaster (either wounded/killed or target due to violence)

IDPs not directly affected by conflict or disaster (fleeing area of origin due to insecurity/violence)

Population on way back to area of origin (returning population which have not reached area of origin)

Population recently returned to the area of origin Other (please specify)

GI.3 What kind of incident has affected the population or forced them to flee from the area of origin?

Violence (Cattle raiding) Violence (including military operations, small weapons, bombing, etc.) Floods Fire Health epidemic Food insecurity Voluntarily returned home but land is occupied by other communities Previously displaced and when returned home, land is occupied by soldiers or other

armed groups Evicted by military or State authorities

Returnees at final destination without allocated land Returnees at final destination with allocated land Stranded returnees Returnees in transit

Other (please specify)

GI.4 How is the relationship between the displaced and the host community?

Host community willing to assist for as long as necessary Host community willing to assist, but for limited time Tensions already exist Other (please specify

Not applicable (not near host community, etc)

GI.5 In the crisis-affected or displaced community, are there any of the following: (mark all that apply)

Older persons (over 60 years) who are living alone and do not have any support from their relatives and/or community.

Children under 18 years who have been separated from both parents and/or caregivers. Estimated number of separated children:

_________________

Persons who have physical and/or mental disability.

Female Headed of Household: Divorced, separated or widowed single female with minor children.

No effective community links: Persons or families who are displaced and have become vulnerable due to the impossibility to relate to the community and who do not receive any support from the community.

GI.6 Population Households

What is the estimate number of people living on the site?

Ask this question from multiple sources – State sources:

GI.7 What is the status of population at the site of assessment?

Number of people on the site are increasing

Number of people on the site are decreasing

Number of people on the site are about the same GI.8 State area of origin of the population? State Jonglei

County Ayod

Payam Mogok

Boma Mogok center GI.9 How many people are killed, injured, missing due to the current incident/crisis? (state time period of reported number)

___________Number of People Dead in last ___________ days

___________Number of People injured in last ___________ days

___________Number of People missing in last ___________ days

GI.10 Do people have cattle with them on site? How many? Other livestock? (goats, chickens etc)

Only the host community has cattle with them, but displaces people they don’t have, and few number of goat were seen.

GI.11 Do IDPs have access to their place of origin, and/or a timeline for return to place of origin?

No any access as there is no any network in the area only Sat phone for communication, plus the IDPs are not feeling safe to return back to their home in Ayod.

ANNEX 2 Shelter NFI Questionnaire

SN.1 Total number of houses/shelters in the area (specify if how many permanent and how many temporary):

SN.2 Average number of people sleeping in each house/shelter (include those staying with a homestead, but sleeping outside the shelter/house):

4 – 7 person

SN.3 Type of shelter used by local population (check one) Tukul Brick structures Simple bamboo / wood structures clad in grass (rakuba) Other (please specify) ______Palm leaves were used for making the fence.______________________________ No shelter is used by local community

SN.4 Number of shelters per household among the local population?

2- 4 shelter per in one compound.

SN.5 Where are the crisis affected, displaced or returnee population currently sleeping? The IDPs are living with the host community. SN.6 Are local materials available and accessible to the crisis affected, displaced or returnee population for gathering to build shelters? (check one, and ensure detail on whether people are physically able to collect material and build shelters – consider gender, age, land availability, security)

Yes - please list which materials are available, which member of the household usually accesses them and how:

No – please provide explanation and detail on accessibility SN.6 Are shelter materials/NFI available and accessible at the local market? (check one, and ensure detail on whether people can access items at the market – do they have cash to spend?)

Yes - please list which materials and items are available, with detail on accessibility and how much each item costs:

No No any shelter materials are available in the market, but the area has a lot of shelter materials, like poles, grass need and palm tree.

SN.7 Do the crisis affected/displaced or returnee population currently have: (check yes or no for each) At least 2 water containers (10 – 20 litres) each? Yes No

Do households have at least one large and one medium cooking pot with a lid, and a knife and two spoons?

Yes No

Plastic sheeting Yes No

Blankets Yes No

Sleeping mats Yes No

Mosquito nets Yes No

Soap Yes No

Clothing Yes No

Shelter framing materials Yes No

Tools for building shelter (eg panga, maddock – please specify which) Yes No

Tools for collecting food (eg fishing or hunting equipment – please specify what) Yes No

SN.1 For households that have NFI and/or shelter material, how did they obtain these?

Brought from home, carried

Purchased at the

local market

Donated by local

community

Distributed by an aid agency

Name of organisation: When: