Audience Feedback

Blank Questionnaire

After seeing the first 5 minutes of our documentary, would you be interested in

watching the rest of the documentary?

This shows that everyone answered yes

to wanting to watch the documentary, this shows that the first 5 minuets engaged the audience, and made

them want to watch it.

To gain feedback that was detailed, we then asked why they would or wouldn’t want to watch the rest

of our documentary. Some quotes include;

“Variety of shots and camera movement made it entertaining to watch”

“engages the audience well and makes you want to watch it”

“Because of the well filmed, steady cutaways, all consistent flow and complete relevance with script”

“Provides good and key information about the chosen topic”

The feedback shows that people thought there was good shots and camera work, that made it easy to watch and the information given in

the first 5 minuets makes the audience engaged, and want to watch the rest of the documentary.

Camerawork

Cutaways

Editing

Sound

Mise-en-scene

1 2 3 4 5

5

3 4

3

1

4 4

3 2 3

31 4

We then asked the target audience to rate the different elements of our documentary, on a scale of

1-5, with 5 being the best.

The feedback shows that on average, most of the target

audience rated our camera work a 4, which shows that it could be

improved, but overall is good, with no less than 4 being the score. The

cutaways got a mixed response, ranging from 3-5 as the score. This

shows they were relevant but could also be improved. The editing got a good response, with it ranging from

4-5 equally.

We asked why the audience rated each of the elements what they did, and these are some of the feedback we

gained and the score they gave along with it;

“good flowing of conventions for professional interviews (rule of thirds)”

“very well filmed, more techniques could have been used such as zoom in & cut”

“Clear view of interviewees and mise-en-scene” “Some interesting shot types and camera zooms for

cutaways”

Camerawork;

“Variety of archive material and well don’t self shot footage”

“Interesting variety that keep audience engaged” “Relatable to topic, enlightening however some too

short” “Related to the topic”

Cutaways;

Editing;

“Ran smoothly throughout“Editing flowed throughout the documentary”

“Flowed well continuously” “Linked in together”

“Incorporated music for entertainment, narration and interviews were at appropriate levels”

“Bit pitchy – noise in back” “Clear and concise, easy to hear/understand”

“Soundtrack links to subject v/o focused”

Sound;

Mise-en-scene;“Lots of fruit & vegetables in the background to

remain relevant”“Like the ‘in situ’ mise-en-scene in the shops and

vegetable shop” “Relatable to topic and work placed”

“Majority of interviews background linked to documentary”

What do you like or dislike about our voiceover?

“Liked the fact it was clear, concise and straight forward with professional emphasis on words”“Voiceover was clear and you could understand

everything”“Good, clear, understandable”“It linked well with the topic”

Did you think that our chosen themes of, healthy eating and 5-a-day, was a constructive

choice for creating a documentary?

YesNo

One person answered no, they suggested we could've used themes including “Sports, disabilities, education”.

This shows that the majority of the target audience thought our chosen themes where a good choice, and the themes were relevant. We could include other suggested themes throughout the documentary.

In what ways do you feel we successfully addressed our chosen theme within the first five minutes of our documentary? Feedback

included;

“The cutaways and vox pops”“Cutaways, well filmed & good camera work”

“All of the interviews are relevant, the title sequence anchors the purpose of the

documentary well”“Title sequence gave a clear indication”

Did you feel our title, U-Trition, effectively reinforce the themes of our

documentary? Feedback included;

“Yes – It is related however some maybe confused”

“Yes – Connotes fruit and vegetables”“Yes and No – Maybe a different title”

“Yes – it has a young feel to it which will broaden the audience”

Would you watch our documentary after listening to our

radio trailer?

Everyone answered yes to this question. This shows that our radio trailer makes the audience want to find out more by watching the documentary, and it enticed them.

Do you think our radio trailer provided a relevant amount of

information?

Everyone answered yes to this question. This shows that the target audience thought our radio trailer had a good amount of information about our documentary, and that the information given is relevant to our documentary.

If so, what information do you think was relevant? Feedback

included;

“The narration made the topic clear”“Script – informative, well spoken and clear”

“Channel and time and I knew exactly what the documentary was based on”

“There were too many soundbites”

Voice Over

Music

Editing

Sound

1 2 3 4 5

1

4 2

5

2

2 5

1 4 3

We then asked the target audience to rate the different elements of our radio trailer, on a scale of

1-5, with 5 being the best.

The feedback shows that on average, most of the target audience rated our Voice over a 5, which shows

overall people thought it was good. The music we used got a mixed

response, ranging from 3-5 as the score. This shows it is relevant but

could also be improved. The editing got a varied response, with some rating it a 3 and others a 5. The

sound also got a varied but good response, ranging from 3-5.

1

“Well narrated”“Same as documentary which anchored the

message”“Clear, linked everything together”

Voice Over;

Music;

“Anchors the documentary well”“Was upbeat, positive”

“Overpowered the speech a little”“Effectively links to the title”

“Ran smoothly”“Good use of editing transitions”

“No jumps, well put together”“Suitable, quick fire”

Editing;

Sound;

“Good quality”“Music bed consistently playing keeps trailer ‘fresh’

sounding”“Good range”

“Slightly louder”

Do you think our print ad is eye-catching enough for our

documentary?

Everyone answered yes to this question. This shows that the target audience thought that our print ad would catch their attention, and would attract them to want to watch the documentary.

We asked the audience to explain why. Feedback included;

“Bright colours & relevant imagery”“Image is bright and professional”

“Very professional graphic of throat”“Colours very bright”

Would you want to watch our documentary after seeing our print

ad?

Everyone answered yes to this question. This shows that the target audience found the print ad enticing, and would want to watch the documentary based off of the information they can see on the print ad.

Do you think our colour scheme used is relevant to the documentary

and the themes of 5-a-day?

Everyone answered yes to this question. This shows that the target audience thought the colour scheme was relevant to our theme of our documentary, and shows the theme of 5-a-day, through the use of imagery.

We asked the audience to explain why. Feedback included;

“Green connotes fruit and veg”“fruit is bright, and so are the colours”

“Green links with health”“Green connotes veg & healthy food”

Do you think the main image we used is appropriate for our

documentary?

Everyone answered yes to this question. This shows that the target audience thinks the image used reflects our documentary, and is appropriate, for the audience to be able to identify what our documentary is about, based off of our documentary.

We asked the audience to explain why. Feedback included;

“Evident it is about food”“Relates to the topic of eating healthy”

“There is a direct link between the image and the message of the documentary, it is clear that is underpins the concept that ‘you are what you

eat’”

Text

Layout

Editing

Image

1 2 3 4 5

1

2 6

7

1

2 6

1 4 6

We then asked the target audience to rate the similarities to other Channel 4 print ads, on a scale

of 1-5, with 5 being the best.

The feedback shows that on average, most of the target

audience rated our text a 5, which shows overall people thought it

was good. The layout of our print ad got a majority score of 5,but one gave it a 1. The editing got a

varied response, with the majority giving it a 5. The colour scheme got a varied response with most

of the audience giving it a 5.

1

Colour scheme

Logo

1

1

513

71

“Visual, eye catching”“Very professional, links well”

“Quite plain, could do with a different font”

Text;

Layout;

“Everything is clearly set out”“Spacious, allows us to get a clear view”“Similar to a professionals print advert”

Editing;“Good, clear, well edited”“Good use of Photoshop”

“Overall fits nicely together”

“Relatable, interesting”“Striking”

“Good image which shows the genre”

Image;

Colour scheme;

“Reflects food”“Could use more colour”“Bright, suits the theme”

Logo;“Positioned clearly”

“Fits the channel well”“Similar to professional print adverts”

Do you think our slogan is relevant to our documentary?

Everyone answered yes to this question. This shows that the target audience thinks the slogan used reflects the themes of our documentary.

We asked the audience to explain why. Feedback included;

“It links to the radio trailer”“It asks the audience a direct question,

therefore intriguing them”“Uses keywords”