Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

15
www.efquel.or g Quality of MOOCs Results from The MOOC Quality Project Prof. Dr. phil. habil. Ulf-Daniel Ehlers Vicepresident Baden-Wurttemberg Cooperative State University President European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning

description

Results of the MOOC Quality Project mooc.efquel.org

Transcript of Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

Page 1: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

www.efquel.org

Quality of MOOCsResults from The MOOC Quality Project

Prof. Dr. phil. habil. Ulf-Daniel EhlersVicepresident Baden-Wurttemberg Cooperative State UniversityPresident European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning

Page 2: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

www.efquel.org

EFQUEL

EFQUEL is a European membership organisation. • EFQUEL consists of more than 120

member institutions from all over Europe and beyond

• Members are associations, universities, companies, vocational training institutions and local networks.

• All members share the same interest: quality and innovation in technology enhanced learning.

• Since 2012 EFQUEL launched the Network of Quality Professionals for Individuals te be involved in EFQUEL

Page 3: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

Digital (R)Evolution in HE

MOOCs are the third digital revolution1. E-Learning hype around new millenium

Changed learning environments2. OER peak from 2007

Giving away knowledge for free3. MOOC peak from 2010

Access to education for free

Page 4: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

The Quality Challenge

All lead to a quality challenge• Start from digital and

technological innovation,• move on to educational

(r)evolution and change, and • Lead to a quest for quality

and innovation strategies.

Page 5: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"
Page 6: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

MOOCs and Quality...?!

• Should we care about the MOOC drop outs?

• Do MOOCs challenge the current HE model?

• How will it be looking when learning and certification will be disaggregated?

• What is it that makes a model with high drop out, little success rates and heterogenious target groups popular?

Page 7: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

The MOOC Quality Project

12 weeks, 12 experts, 12 posts, 12.000 Readers, >150 comments m

ooc.e

fqu

el.o

rg

Page 8: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

1. Massive Target Audience? • Change from „no target audience“-

thinking to having one in mind, even if it is wide. Take into acount new participation profiles.

MOOC

Lurkers

Passive participants

Active participants

Drop-ins

HILL, P. (2013) “The Four Student Archetypes Emerging in MOOCs” [Online] e-Literate blog post 02/03/13 [accessed 19/04/13]. Available:

http://mfeldstein.com/the-four-student-archetypes-emerging-in-moocs/

Page 9: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

www.efquel.org

2. Mixing Groups?

• Be aware that inviting the world means to bring in the worlds opinion (existing groups might be disturbed)

• Mixing campus and MOOC Students might be challenging: drive in/by learners vs. highly motivated learners who want a masters degree.

http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

Page 10: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

3. Learning Across Contexts

• Be aware that the quality paradigm “fitness for purpose” is not working for MOOCs because MOOCs mean learning across contexts and purposes.

• Quality measures become individualised, quality methods like self- & peer-assessment and –reflection are suitable.http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

Page 11: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

www.efquel.org

4. Support Self-Organization• Be open about your requirements of

self-organisation, provide scaffolding for those who lack that self-organisation.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Fugle%2C_%C3%B8rns%C3%B8_073.jpg

Page 12: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

5. Declare What‘s in it!

1. the degree of openness, 2. the scale of participation

(massification), 3. the amount of use of multimedia, 4. the amount of communication, 5. the extent to which collaboration

is included, 6. the type of learner pathway (from

learner centred to teacher-centred and highly structured),

1. the level of quality assurance,

2. the extent to which reflection is encouraged,

3. the level of assessment, 4. how informal or formal it

is, 5. autonomy, 6. and diversity.

Be precise about the content and purpose of the MOOC (self-declaration) and keep promises! (Use a MOOC description model)

(Conole 2013)

Page 13: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

6. Peer-to-Peer Pedagogy• Use peer-to-peer pedagogy: peer-

learning, peer-review, peer-assessment, collaborative learning, multiple learning pathways and exploratory learning

• Understand that teaching is not a prerequsite of learning.

http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

Page 14: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

www.efquel.org

7. MOOCs Support Choice Based Learning

• Get away from – the notion that „ending a MOOC early“ means

dropping out – looking at MOOCs like (structured, paced,

timebound) courses

• Be aware that MOOC learning is an opt-in/out learning model

• MOOCs follow voluntary sequencing and are based on choices. The choices they offer make their attractiveness.

http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

Page 15: Quaity of MOOCs - Results of "The MOOC Quality Project"

www.efquel.org

WWW.EFQUEL.ORG

EFQUEL office in BrusselsRue des deux Eglises 35B – 1000 BRUSSELSBELGIUMTel : + 32 2 639 30 32Fax : + 32 2 644 35 83Email : [email protected]