Public’DebtSustainability’Analysisfor’...

27
Public Debt Sustainability Analysis for Market Access Countries (MACs): The IMF’s Framework September 2015 1 S. Ali Abbas International Monetary Fund

Transcript of Public’DebtSustainability’Analysisfor’...

Public  Debt  Sustainability  Analysis  for  Market  Access  Countries  (MACs):

The  IMF’s  Framework

September  20151

S.  Ali  AbbasInternational  Monetary  Fund

Outline

Risk  -­‐ Based  Approach

Lower  Scrutiny  DSA  (Basic  DSA)

Realism  of  Baseline  Assumptions

Motivation  for  2013  “MAC  DSA”  reform

Higher  Scrutiny  DSA  (Additional  modules)

Heat  Map:  Stress  Tests  and  Debt  Profile

Fan  Charts

DSA  Write  Up

2

Traditionally,  the  focus  was  mainly  on  debt  trajectories….  

3

Key  Features  of  the  MAC  DSA

• More  analysis   for  countries  with  potentially  greater  vulnerabilities  

Risk  -­‐ based  approach

• Realism  of  underlying  assumptions• Risks  to  debt  level,  gross  financing  needs,  and  debt  profile,  macro-­‐fiscal  nexus,  and  bank-­‐sovereign  nexus

Multifaceted  analysis

• Standardized  charts  and  tables,  fan  charts,  heat  map,  write-­‐up

Clear  and  transparent  presentation  of  results

4

Risk  assessment   based  on  benchmarks  derived  from  early  warning  model

Toolkit   is  flexible  and  can  be  tailored  to  country-­‐specific  circumstances

Risk-­‐Based  Approach

Public  debt  to  GDP >  50/60%  for  EMs/AEs

Public  gross  financing needs  (GFN)  to  GDP >  10/15%  for  EMs/AEs

Exceptional  access  to  Fund  resources

Lower  scrutiny Higher  scrutinyJudgment

5

6

Risk-­‐Based  Outputs

Basic  DSA

DSA  write-­‐up  

Basic  DSA

Realism  of  baseline  assumptions

Heat  map,  stress  tests,  debt  profile,  fan  charts

where  relevant  Customized  and  contingent  liabilities  analysis

Lower  scrutiny Higher  scrutiny

6

Basic  DSA  -­‐ 1

As  of  June  15,  20142/ 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Sovereign  Spreads

Nominal  gross  public  debt 48.9 85.9 94.0 98.7 101.2 102.3 102.3 101.3 99.8 EMBIG  (bp)  3/ 160

Public  gross  financing  needs 11.1 22.0 20.8 20.5 20.0 19.4 18.7 18.0 17.4 5Y  CDS  (bp) 90

Real  GDP  growth  (in  percent) 1.6 -­‐1.6 -­‐1.2 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 Ratings Foreign LocalInflation  (GDP  deflator,  in  percent) 2.5 0.0 0.6 -­‐0.1 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.4 Moody's Baa2 Baa2Nominal  GDP  growth  (in  percent) 4.2 -­‐1.6 -­‐0.6 1.1 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.4 S&Ps BBB BBBEffective  interest  rate  (in  percent)  4/ 4.3 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 Fitch BBB+ BBB+

Debt,  Economic  and  Market  Indicators   1/

Projections2003-­‐2011

Actual

-­‐10

-­‐5

0

5

10

15

20

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Debt-­‐Creating   Flows  

Primary  deficit Real  GDP  growth Real  interest  rate  Exchange  rate  depreciation Other  debt-­‐creating  flows ResidualChange  in  gross  public  sector  debt

projection

(in  percent  of  GDP)

-­‐15

-­‐10

-­‐5

0

5

10

15

20

cumulative

7

Basic  DSA  -­‐ 2

Alternative  Scenarios

Composition  of  Public  Debt

Baseline Historical Constant  Primary  Balance

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Gross  Nominal  Public  Debt(in  percent  of  GDP)

projection0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Public  Gross   Financing  Needs(in  percent  of  GDP)

projection

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019

By  Maturity

Medium  and  long-­‐ termShort-­‐ term

projection

(in  percent  of  GDP)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019

By  Currency

Local  currency-­‐denominatedForeign  currency-­‐denominated

projection

(in  percent  of  GDP)

8

Risk-­‐Based  Outputs

Basic  DSA

DSA  write-­‐up  

Basic  DSA

Realism  of  baseline  assumptions

Heat  map,  stress  tests,  debt  profile,  fan  charts

where  relevant  Customized  and  contingent  liabilities  analysis

Lower  scrutiny Higher  scrutiny

9

Realism  of  Baseline:  Higher  Scrutiny  Cases

10

Realism  of  Baseline

Source  :  IMF  Staff.1/  Plotted  distribution  includes  surveillance  countries,  percentile  rank  refers  to  all  countries.2/  Projections  made  in  the  spring  WEO  vintage  of  the  preceding  year.3/  Not  applicable  for  Italy.4/  Data  cover  annual  obervations  from  1990  to  2011  for  advanced  and  emerg ing  economies  with  debt  g reater  than  60  percent  of  GDP.  Percent  of  sample  on  vertical  axis.  5/  For  Italy  the  bulk  of  the  adjustment  already  occurred  in  2012  and  the  pace  of  consolidation  slows  to  1  percent  of  GDP  in  2013.

Italy  Public  DSA  -­‐  Realism  of  Baseline  Assumptions

Forecast  Track  Record,  versus  surveillance  countries

Boom-­‐Bust  Analysis  3/Assessing  the  Realism  of  Projected  Fiscal  Adjustment

-­‐10

-­‐8

-­‐6

-­‐4

-­‐2

0

2

4

6

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Year  2/

Real  GDP  Growth

Interquartile  range  (25-­‐75)MedianItaly  forecast  error

-­‐ 1.467%Has  a  percentile   rank  of:

Italy  median  forecast  error,  2004-­‐2012:

Distribution  of  forecast  errors:  1/

(in  percent,  actual-­‐projection)

-­‐10

-­‐8

-­‐6

-­‐4

-­‐2

0

2

4

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Year  2/

Primary  Balance

Interquartile  range  (25-­‐75)MedianItaly  forecast  error

0.4968%Has  a  percentile   rank  of:

Italy  median  forecast  error,  2004-­‐2012:

Distribution  of  forecast  errors:  1/

(in  percent  of  GDP,  actual-­‐projection)

-­‐6

-­‐4

-­‐2

0

2

4

6

8

10

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Year  2/

Inf lation  (Deflator)

Interquartile  range  (25-­‐75)MedianItaly  forecast  error

-­‐ 0.1713%Has  a  percentile   rank  of:

Italy  median  forecast  error,  2004-­‐2012:

Distribution  of  forecast  errors:  1/

(in  percent,  actual-­‐projection)

pessim

istic

optim

istic

-­‐6

-­‐4

-­‐2

0

2

4

6

8

t-­‐5 t-­‐4 t-­‐3 t-­‐2 t-­‐1 t t+ 1 t+ 2 t+ 3 t+ 4 t+ 5

Real  GDP  g rowth

Italy(in  percent)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Less -­‐4 -­‐3 -­‐2 -­‐1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D istribution  4/

Italy

3-­‐Year Adjustment  in  Cyclically-­‐Adjusted  Primary  Balance   (CAPB)   5/(Percent  of  GDP)

More

3-­‐year  CAPB adjustment  g reater  than  3  percent  of  

GDP  in  approx.  top  quartilehas  a  percentile  rank  of 18%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Less -­‐4 -­‐3 -­‐2 -­‐1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D istribution  4/

Italy

3-­‐Year Averag e   Level   of  Cyclically-­‐Adjusted  Primary  Balance   (CAPB)(Percent  of  GDP)

More

3-­‐year  average CAPB  level  g reater  than  3.5  percent  of  GDP  in  approx.  top  quartilehas  a  percentile  

rank  of 9%

11

Forecast  Track  Record

-­‐10

-­‐8

-­‐6

-­‐4

-­‐2

0

2

4

6

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Year  2/

Real  GDP  Growth

Interquartile  range  (25-­‐75)MedianExample  forecast  error

-­‐ 1.4910%Has  a  percentile   rank  of:

Example  median  forecast   error,  2005-­‐2013:

Distribution  of  forecast  errors:  1/

(in  percent,  actual-­‐projection)

-­‐10

-­‐8

-­‐6

-­‐4

-­‐2

0

2

4

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Year  2/

Primary  Balance

Interquartile  range  (25-­‐75)MedianExample  forecast  error

0.4975%Has  a  percentile   rank  of:

Example  median  forecast   error,  2005-­‐2013:

Distribution  of  forecast  errors:  1/

(in  percent  of  GDP,  actual-­‐projection)

12

Projected  Fiscal  Adjustment

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14Less -­‐4 -­‐3 -­‐2 -­‐1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D istribution  4/

Example

3-­‐Year Adjustment  in  Cyclically-­‐Adjusted  Primary  Balance   (CAPB)(Percent  of  GDP)

More

13

Risk-­‐Based  Outputs

Basic  DSA

DSA  write-­‐up  

Basic  DSA

Realism  of  baseline  assumptions

Heat  map,  stress  tests,  debt  profile,  fan  charts

where  relevant  Customized  and  contingent  liabilities  analysis

Lower  scrutiny Higher  scrutiny

14

Three  additional  modules:                                                                                                                            Heat  Map,  Debt  Profile,    Fan  Charts

15

Heat  Map

Heat  Map

16

Heat  Map

17

Stress  Tests

18

Snap  Shot  of  recent  DSAs  for  G20  Countries:  Debt    Level

AE/EM Scrutiny Country

Debt  to  GDP Growth  Shock

Primary  Balance  Shock

Interest  Rate  Shock

Exchange  Rate  Shock

Conting ent  Liability  Shock

AM Higher Canada 86.8 3 3 3 3 0AM Higher France 94.3 3 3 3 3 0AM Higher Germany 75.1 1 1 1 1 0AM Higher Italy 135.2 3 3 3 3 3AM Higher Japan 243.2 3 3 3 3 3AM Higher Spain 98.7 3 3 3 3 3AM Higher United  Kingdom 92.0 3 3 3 3 3AM Higher United  States 107.3 3 3 3 3 3AM Lower Australia 31.2 1 1 1 1 1AM Lower Korea 37.7 1 1 1 1 0

EM Higher Brazil 72.0 3 3 3 3 3EM Higher India 67.3 2 1 1 1 2EM Higher Mexico 47.8 1 1 1 1 0EM Higher South  Africa 43.8 1 1 1 1 0EM Higher Turkey 35.4 1 1 1 1 1EM Lower China 18.3 1 1 1 1 1EM Lower Indonesia 26.8 1 1 1 1 0EM Lower Russia 15.5 1 1 1 1 0EM Lower Saudi  Arabia 2.6 1 1 1 1 019

Snap  Shot  of  recent  DSAs  for  G20  Countries:  Gross  Financing  Needs

AE/EM Scrutiny Country

GFN  to  GDP Growth  Shock

Primary  Balance  Shock

Interest  Rate  Shock

Exchange  Rate  Shock

Conting ent  Liability  Shock

AM Higher Canada 18.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0AM Higher France 8.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0AM Higher Germany 15.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0AM Higher Italy 23.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0AM Higher Japan 54.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0AM Higher Spain 20.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0AM Higher United  Kingdom 11.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0AM Higher United  States 22.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0AM Lower Australia 3.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0AM Lower Korea 6.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

EM Higher Brazil 14.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0EM Higher India 13.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0EM Higher Mexico 10.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0EM Higher South  Africa 12.0 2 2 1 1 0EM Higher Turkey 10.4 1 1 1 1 2EM Lower China 1.0 1 1 1 1 2EM Lower Indonesia 4.0 1 1 1 1 0EM Lower Russia 2.0 1 1 1 1 0EM Lower Saudi  Arabia -­‐2.5 1 2 1 1 0

20

Risk-­‐Based  Outputs

Basic  DSA

DSA  write-­‐up  

Basic  DSA

Realism  of  baseline  assumptions

Heat  map,  stress  tests,  debt  profile,  fan  charts

where  relevant  Customized  and  contingent  liabilities  analysis

Lower  scrutiny Higher  scrutiny

21

DSA  Write  Up

Presents  overall  assessment  of  debt  sustainability  risks

Highlights  vulnerabilities  and  country  specific  circumstances  that  mitigate  or  amplify  risks

Discusses  background  and  key  assumptions  including  realism  of  the  baseline

22

Thank  you!

23

Additional  slides

24

Fan  Charts:  Stochastic  Simulations  of  Debt  Paths

Evolution  of  Predictive  Densities  of  Gross  Nominal  Public  Debt(in  percent  of  GDP)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

10th-­‐25th 25th-­‐75th 75th-­‐90thPercentiles:Baseline

Symmetric  Distribution

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Restricted  (Asymmetric)  Distribution

no  restriction  on  the  g rowth  rate  shockno  restriction  on  the  interest  rate  shock0  is  the  max  positive  pb  shock  (percent  GDP)no  restriction  on  the  exchange  rate  shock

Restrictions  on  upside  shocks:

25

Debt  Profile

Example Upper  early  warningLower  early  warning(Indicators  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  risk  assessment  benchmarks,  in  2013)

 Debt  Profile  Vulnerabilities

1 2

400

600

165  bp

1 2

17

25

35%

1 2

1

1.5

-­‐0.4%1 2

Bond  spreadExternal  Financing  

Requirement

Annual  Chang e  in  Short-­‐Term  Public  

Debt

Public  Debt  in  Foreig n  Currency

(in  basis  points)  4/ (in  percent   of  GDP)  5/ (in  percent   of  total) (in  percent   of  total)

30

4535%

1 2

Public  Debt  H eld  by  Non-­‐Residents

(in  percent   of  total)

26

Snap  Shot  of  recent  DSAs  for  G20  Countries:  Debt    Profile

AE/EM Scrutiny Country

Market  Perception

External  Financing  Requirement

Change  in  the  Share  of  ST  Debt

Public  Debt  Held  by  Non-­‐Residents

Foreig n  Currency  Debt

AM Higher Canada 1 3 1 1 0AM Higher France 1 1 1 3 0AM Higher Germany 1 0 1 3 0AM Higher Italy 1 3 1 1 0AM Higher Japan 1 1 1 1 0AM Higher Spain 1 3 1 2 0AM Higher United  Kingdom 1 1 1 1 0AM Higher United  States 1 3 1 2 0AM Lower Australia 1 0 1 3 0AM Lower Korea 1 0 1 1 0

EM Higher Brazil 2 2 1 2 1EM Higher India 2 2 1 1 1EM Higher Mexico 1 2 2 3 2EM Higher South  Africa 2 2 1 2 1EM Higher Turkey 2 3 2 2 2EM Lower China 1 1 1 1 1EM Lower Indonesia 2 0 2 3 2EM Lower Russia 0 2 1 1 1EM Lower Saudi  Arabia 1 0 1 0 1

27