Proposed Proposed Relocation of Locationfor … Proposed Relocation of Locationfor Douglass Rd....
-
Upload
duongtuyen -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Proposed Proposed Relocation of Locationfor … Proposed Relocation of Locationfor Douglass Rd....
Proposed Proposed Proposed Relocation of Location for Douglass Rd. Generation FIGURE 5- RELOCATION OF DOUGLASS BLVD. A i lApproximattely SITE SUITABILITY/ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION FOR Facilities GENERATION FACILITIES 6000 LF OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA
Exhibit 6 - Relocation of Douglas Rd. for Alternative 1
Generation Facilities
FIGURE 4- FUTURE PLANNED FACILITIES SITE SUITABILITY/ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION FOR
GENERATION FACILITIES OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA
Location of High Pressure Gas Line
Exhibit 7 - Future Planned Facilities
Exhibit 8 - Proposed Action/Alternative No. 1 Cost Comparison Table
Element Proposed Action Alternative No. 1
Site Excavation $100,000 $50,000
Paving and Grading $500,000 $350,000
Electrical Duct Bank $400,000 $330,000
High Pressure Gas Line $70,000 $100,000
Relocation of Douglas Blvd $0 $1,350,000
Total: $1,070,000 $2,150,000
Notes:
(1) Costs do not include engineering and administration costs
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
D D D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D D
D
D D
D
D D
D
D
D D
D D
D D
D
D D
D
D D D D D
D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D D
D
D
D D
D D
D
D
D D
D D
D
D D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D D D D
D
D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D
D
D D D D D
D D
D
D
D
D D D D
D
D D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D
D D
D
D D D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D D D D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D D
D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D D D D D
D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D
D D
D D
D
D D D
D D
D D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D D D
D
D D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D D D
D D
D
D
DD D D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D
D D D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D D D D D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D D D D
D
D
D D D D D
DD D D
D
D
D D DD D
D D
D
D
D
D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D
D
D D D D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
OK
LA
HO
MA G
EOLOGICAL SUR
VE
Y
1908 CENTENNIAL 20
08
MA
GN
ET
IC N
OR
TH
TR
UE
NO
RT
H
Exhibit 9 - Geologic Map of the Franklin Quadrangle Oklahoma Geologic Quadrangle OGQ-26
Geologic Map of the Franklin OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
7.5 Quadrangle Charles J. Mankin, Director (previously Open-File Report OF8-2001)
CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS PgrQal
Pgr Pgr
Qal
PE
RM
IAN
Q
UA
TE
RN
AR
Y
Pgr
HO
LOC
ENEPgr
Qal Qal
UNCONFORMITY
Phy
LEO
NA
RD
IAN
Pgr
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS Pgr
ALLUVIUM (Holocene) Clay, silt, sand, and gravel in channels and on flood plains of modern– streams. Includes terrace deposits of similar composition located directly above and adjacent to modern channels and flood plains. Thickness: 0 to about 30 ft
HENNESSEY FORMATION (Permian) Shale and siltstone, poorly exposed, mostly moderate– Pgr
reddish brown (10R4/6), moderate red (5R4/6), to moderate reddish orange (10R6/6) with conspicuous light greenish gray (5GY8/1) iron-reduction spots. The lower 20 - 30 ft is predominantly a blocky-weathering, silty shale and clayshale that exhibits good paleosol development; locally with
Phy lenticular beds of sandstone and siltstone-pebble conglomerate and fine- to very fine grained sandstone. Shale typically unstratified and highly fractured; rarely with small-scale slickensides that are evidence of paleosol development. Above the lower part, thin-bedded to laminated, stratified to
Pgr well stratified siltstones and very fine grained sandstones are more common. Siltstone moderately to well stratified. Sandstone locally cross-stratified on large and small scale, uncommonly trough-cross-
Qal stratified and/or ripple marked. Trace fossils and shale rip-up clasts very rare. Sandstone rarely forms channelform deposits. Shale outcrops locally weather to blocky, very fractured, or “hackly” appearance; form bare, rounded outcrops and/or “badlands”-type topography. In other places, shale weathers to muddy soil with abundant small calcareous nodules. Calcite veinlets uncommon. Interbedded siltstone and shale weather to bench-and-slope topography. Siltstone and sandstone exhibit platy to flaggy weathering. Siltstone and sandstone beds with small-scale cross-stratification and ripples. Moderately indurated, occur as resistant beds capping tops of hills and ridges. Overall, unit is expressed as highly weathered, muddy soil. Thickness: 0 - 20 ft, top not exposed
GARBER FORMATION (Permian) Sandstone, mostly fine-grained to less commonly very fine to– medium-fine-grained; appears to be very fine grained near base; moderate reddish brown (10R4/6), moderate reddish orange (10R6/6), moderate red (5R5/4), light brown (5YR5/6), and dark yellowish orange (10YR6/6); minor siltstone, shale, siltstone-pebble conglomerate. Sandstone typically porous and friable. Commonly weathers to smooth, rounded outcrops; locally with platy to flaggy to rarely slabby appearance. Locally weathers to hard, dark-colored (grayish black [N2]) beds completely cemented with hematite, calcite, and/or silica. Dark-colored sandstone blocks locally
Pgr
Qal form lag deposit over weathered outcrops. Large- and small-scale crossbeds, trough crossbeds common; many outcrops characterized by inclined beds and channelform deposits, although plane-parallel stratification also present. Shale and/or siltstone rip-up clasts uncommon; burrow extremely rare. Sandstone locally color-banded (e.g., moderate reddish brown (10R4/6), grayish red purple (5RP4/2), and grayish yellow green (5GY7/2)) or with mottled appearance. Small calcareous and iron-oxide spheres occur locally on weathered surfaces. Circular iron-reduction spots very rare. Siltstone and shale sandy, color-banded (e.g., moderate reddish brown (10R4/6) and yellowish gray (5Y7/2)), stratified to unstratified, and with uncommon iron-reduction spots as large as 2 in. in diameter. Typically soft, weather to “badlands”-type topography. Siltstone and shale common near
Pgr
the base and top of formation. In places, siltstone and shale contain evidence of paleosol development such as blocky weathering, fractures with fracture surfaces marked by small slickensides, through-going curved fractures, and calcareous concretions. Barite roses (Oklahoma rose rock) common south of Lake Stanley Draper. Thickness: about 950 ft; however, base not exposed
D''''D''' Pgr
Pgr SYMBOLS
Unit contact; dashed where approximate
Mappable bed of conglomeratePgr
Qal Mappable concentration of barite roses or crystals
D Outcrop, geologic observation Qal
! Petroleum well. Includes oil, gas, oil and gas, dry service (water supply or injection), junked and abandoned, unknown. Modified
from Natural Resources Information System database
97°45’ 97°07’30’’ 35°45’ 35°45’
A A’ A’’ A’’’ A’’’’ A’’’’’
B’’’ B’’’’B B’ B’’ B’’’’’
QalPgr
Pgr Choctaw
City
Pgr Del City
C C’ C’’ C’’’ C’’’’ C’’’’’ Qal
D D’
D’’ Moore D’’’ D’’’’ D’’’’’
E E’ E’’
E’’’ E’’’’ E’’’’’
35°07’30”
97°45’
35°07’30”
97°07’30”Pgr EXPLANATION
Current Map
Qal Mapped Quadrangles
Major Cities
Expanding Suburbs and Communities
Pgr North
5 Miles
Pgr Base Map CreditsPgr
The base map was compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey from aerial photographsQal and photogrammetric methods. Aerial photographs taken 1954. Field checked 1956. Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.1927 NorthAmerican Datum. 10,000
Phy foot grid ticks based on Oklahoma coordinate system, south zone. 1,000-meter UTM grid, zone 14.
Geologic Map Credits
Geology byThomas M. Stanley and Neil H. Suneson, 2000-2001. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, under AssistanceAward Number 00HQPA0002. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Originally published as Open-File Report OF8-2001. Map revised and published as OGQ-26. Cartography and layout prepared by G. Russell Standridge, 2002.
QalPgr
Pgr
Qal Pgr
Phy Pgr
8½ °
APPROXIMATE MEAN DECLINATION
Feet D''' FeetD'''' 1300 1300
1200 Qal 1200
Qal Qal Qal
Qal
Qal
1000 1000
800 800
Pgr Pgr
600
Ma
bo
1 H
en
ryP
roj. 6
20
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
Ca
rte
r 1
Sch
oo
l L
an
d M
oo
reP
roj. 5
60
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
Ge
od
yn
e 2
-36
Sta
teo
fO
kla
ho
ma
Pro
j. 8
90
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
Arr
ow
he
ad
36
-1 S
tate
Pro
j. 5
60
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
Ch
ap
ma
n &
Pa
rke
r 1
Zim
me
rma
nP
roj.
10
,20
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
Ch
ap
ma
n &
Pa
rke
r 1
Ma
uld
inP
roj. 9
65
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
400
He
rma
n B
row
n 1
Su
ble
ttP
roj. 6
30
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
Wellington Formation
Pa
rris
h &
Re
yn
old
s 1
Little
Pro
j. 3
00
ft.
fro
m n
ort
h
Pre
tro
leu
m 1
Lu
cu
sP
roj. 3
00
0 f
t. f
rom
so
uth
An
-So
n 1
Ow
en
be
yP
roj. 2
30
0 f
t. f
rom
no
rth
Da
vid
or
& D
avid
or
1 H
aye
sP
roj. 5
50
0 f
t. f
rom
no
rth
200
Sea Level Sea Level 10x vertical exaggeration. Formation contacts based on wireline-log interpretations by N.H. Suneson and surface mapping by the authors. Vertical lines show logs used in interpretations.
200
400
600
97° 22'18''W
Exhibit 10- Soil Survey
Farmland Classification—Cleveland County, Oklahoma
97° 22'13''W
647990 648000 648010 648020 648030 648040 648050 648060 648070 648080 648090 648100 35° 19'44''N 35° 19'44''N
35° 19'39''N
3910600
3910610
3910620
3910630
3910640
3910650
3910660
3910670
3910680
3910690
3910700
3910710
3910720
3910730
3910740
3910750
3910600
3910610
3910620
3910630
3910640
3910650
3910660
3910670
3910680
3910690
3910700
3910710
3910720
3910730
3910740
3910750
97° 22' 13'' W
35° 19'39''N
647990 648000 648010 648020 648030 648040 648050 648060 648070 648080 648090 648100
MapScale:1:754 ifprintedonAportrait (8.5" x11") sheet. Meters
N 0 10 20 40 60Feet
0 35 70 140 210Mapprojection:Web Mercator Cornercoordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTMZone14NWGS84
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/6/2015Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4
97° 22' 18'' W
Farmland Classification—Cleveland County, Oklahoma
Farmland Classification
Farmland Classification— Summary by Map Unit — Cleveland County, Oklahoma (OK027)
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
1 Stephenville-Darsil-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes
All areas are prime farmland
0.7 28.5%
2 Harrah fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes
All areas are prime farmland
1.8 71.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 2.5 100.0%
Description
Farmland classification identifies map units as prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance, farmland of local importance, or unique farmland. It identifies the location and extent of the soils that are best suited to food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops. NRCS policy and procedures on prime and unique farmlands are published in the "Federal Register," Vol. 43, No. 21, January 31, 1978.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary
Tie-break Rule: Lower
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
3/6/2015