Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

175

Transcript of Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page 1: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL
Page 2: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 1

Cover Page

1. Name: Pham Thuy Duong,(2430318)

Class: DIM1VC

2. Name: Ivander Laurentius Atmojo (2430243)

Class: DIM1VA

3. Name: Corhana Dan Andrei (2430403)

Class: DIM1VA

4. Name: Gework Petrosjan (2431488)

Class: DIM1VB

5. Name: Mohammed Ababakar (2431451)

Class: DIM1VB

Page 3: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 2

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5

Chapter 2. European Travel Industry Overview .................................................................................... 6

2.1What is travel industry? ................................................................................................................... 6

2.2 European Travel Industry ................................................................................................................ 6

2.3. Business Model .............................................................................................................................. 9

2.5 Daughter companies of TUI and Thomas Cook ............................................................................ 13

2.6 Competitors of TUI and Thomas Cook .......................................................................................... 16

Chapter 3 Financial Analysis ............................................................................................................... 20

3.1.1 Thomas Cook Group PLC and TUI Travel PLC Key Figures Compared ......................................... 21

3.1.2 Profit & Loss Account Compared ............................................................................................... 23

3.1.3 Thomas Cook Group PLC and TUI Travel PLC Balance Sheet Compared .................................... 24

3.2 Profit Margin Analysis ........................................................................................................... 25

3.2.3 Profit Margin Analysis ............................................................................................................ 27

3.3.1 RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 31

3.4.1 Return on Stockholder Equity Analysis. ................................................................................. 35

3.5 Liquidity Ratios .............................................................................................................................. 41

3.5.2 Current Ratio Analysis ............................................................................................................ 42

3.6 Leverage Ratios ............................................................................................................................. 50

3.6.2 Debt to Asset Ratio analysis ................................................................................................... 51

3.6.4 Debts to Equity Ratio Analysis.................................................................................................... 53

3.7 Financial Analysis Summary ...................................................................................................... 54

3.7.1 Financial Analysis Conclusion ................................................................................................. 57

Chapter 4: Marketing ...................................................................................................................... 58

4.1. Mission statement: .............................................................................................................. 58

4.2. SWOT Analysis: .................................................................................................................... 59

4.3. Strategic Objectives: ............................................................................................................ 61

4.4. Market position: ................................................................................................................... 64

4.5. Product and Service: ............................................................................................................ 76

4.5.1. TUI travel plc ..................................................................................................................... 76

4.5.2. Thomas Cook ..................................................................................................................... 80

4.5.3. Financial Services related travel of TUI travel plc and Thomas Cook: ............................... 81

Page 4: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 3

4.6. The Boston Consulting Group box (BCG matrix)................................................................... 84

4.7. Supply chain: ........................................................................................................................ 85

4.8. Price ..................................................................................................................................... 88

4.9. Promotion ............................................................................................................................ 89

4.10. Distribution ........................................................................................................................ 94

4.10.1. Booking Routes ............................................................................................................... 94

4.10.2. Distribution channels ...................................................................................................... 95

4.10.3. Cross Channel Marketing ................................................................................................ 95

4.11. Ecommerce ........................................................................................................................ 96

4.12. Conlusion for Marketing chapter ....................................................................................... 98

Chapter 5 Management and Organization: ..................................................................................... 98

5.1. Company Profile ................................................................................................................... 99

5.1.1. Company Background ........................................................................................................... 99

5.1.2. Company Scale ................................................................................................................ 101

5.1.3. Mission Statement .......................................................................................................... 101

5.3.4. Vision and Values: ........................................................................................................... 102

5.3.5. Sustainability Development and Social Responsibility .................................................... 103

5.2. Company Organization ....................................................................................................... 106

5.2.1. Organizational structures .................................................................................................... 106

5.3. Human Resources Management ........................................................................................ 109

5.3.1. Recruitment ........................................................................................................................ 109

5.3.1.1.TUI Travel plc .................................................................................................................... 109

5.3.1.2. Thomas Cook ................................................................................................................ 113

5.3.2. Job Selection ................................................................................................................... 114

5.3.2.1.Finland TUI .................................................................................................................... 114

5.3.2.2. Finland Thomas Cook ................................................................................................... 116

5.3.3.1.Germany TUI ................................................................................................................. 116

5.3.3.1. Germany (Thomas cook) .............................................................................................. 117

5.3.3.Emloyee engagement ...................................................................................................... 118

5.3.4. Personal expenses ........................................................................................................... 119

5.4. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 119

Chapter 6 Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................. 120

6.1 Financial ..................................................................................................................................... 120

6.2 Marketing ................................................................................................................................... 123

Page 5: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 4

6.2.3 Marketing Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................... 124

6.2.3.1 Mission Statement ................................................................................................................ 124

6.2.3.2 SWOT Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 124

6.2.3.3 Strategic Objective ................................................................................................................ 127

6.2.4 Market Position........................................................................................................................ 128

6.2.4.1 Market Dynamics UK & Ireland ............................................................................................. 128

6.2.4.2 Market Dynamics Continental Europe .................................................................................. 129

6.2.4.3 Market Dynamic Northern Europe: ....................................................................................... 130

6.2.4.4 Market Dynamics North America .......................................................................................... 131

6.2.4.5 Market Dynamics Germany................................................................................................... 132

6.2.5 BCG MATRIX ............................................................................................................................. 133

6.2.6 Distribution Channels ............................................................................................................... 134

6.3 Management Key Performance Indicators .............................................................................. 135

6.3.3.1Company profile ............................................................................................................. 135

6.3.3.1.1Mission Statement ...................................................................................................... 135

6.3.3.1.2 Vision and Mission ..................................................................................................... 136

6.3.3.1.3 Sustainability Development ....................................................................................... 136

6.3.3.2Company Organisation ................................................................................................... 139

6.3.3.2.1 Organizational Structures........................................................................................... 139

6.3.3.2.1 Departmentalization .................................................................................................. 140

6.3.3.2.2 Recruitment Plan........................................................................................................ 141

Chapter 7. References....................................................................................................................... 142

FINANCIAL APPENDICES ................................................................................................................ 144

Appendixes 3 .................................................................................................................................... 153

Cooperation Agreement Group 6 (Period 4) ..................................................................................... 171

Page 6: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 5

Chapter 1 Introduction

In this semester, our task is to set a bench mark based on quick scan on two travel companies--UI

and Thomas Cook. Through the comparison of Key Performance Indicators (such as mission, strategy,

market share, turnover, export ability, financial conditions etc.), we will come to a conclusion which

one is “better”.

In our analyzing procedure, we are going to use the external and internal analysis where we have

much experience and interview method in real context. By those efficient tools, we will draw a full

picture of two selected companies. The main phrases consist of two steps. First of all, we will

measure them from each comparable aspect and then pose our constructive conclusions based on a

range of data analysis and interpreting.

Page 7: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 6

Chapter 2. European Travel Industry Overview

2.1What is travel industry? Travel (or Tourism) is going for entertainment, leisure or business purposes. The World

Tourism Organization defines tourists as people who "travel to and stay in places outside

their usual environment for more than twenty-four hours and not more than one consecutive

year for leisure, business and other purposes not related to the exercise of an activity

remunerated from within the place visited".

2.2 European Travel Industry

Geography

Conventionally, Europe is one of the world's seven continents. Comprising the westernmost

peninsula of Eurasia, Europe is generally divided from Asia to its east by the water divide of

the Ural Mountains, the Ural River, the Caspian Sea, the Caucasus Mountains (or the Kuma-

Manych Depression), and the Black Sea to the southeast. Europe is bordered by the Arctic

Ocean and other bodies of water to the north, the Atlantic Ocean to the west, the

Mediterranean Sea to the south, and the Black Sea and connected waterways to the southeast.

Yet the borders for Europe-a concept dating back to classical antiquity-are somewhat

arbitrary, as the term continent can refer to a cultural and political distinction or a

physiographic one.

Europe is the world's second-smallest

continent by surface area, covering about

10,180,000 square kilometers (3,930,000

sq mi) or 2% of the Earth's surface and

about 6.8% of its land area. Of Europe's

approximately 50 states, Russia is the

largest by both area and population, while

Vatican City is the smallest. Europe is the

third-most populous continent after Asia

and Africa, with a population of 731

million or about 11% of the world's

population. However, according to the

United Nations (medium estimate),

Europe's share may fall to about 7% by

2050. In 1900, Europe's share of the

world's population was 25%.

Europe, in particular Ancient Greece, is the birthplace of Western culture. It played a

predominant role in global affairs from the 16th century onwards, especially after the

Page 8: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 7

beginning of colonialism. Between the 16th and 20th centuries, European nations controlled

at various times the Americas, most of Africa, Oceania, and large portions of Asia. Both

World Wars were largely focused upon Europe, greatly contributing to a decline in Western

European dominance in world affairs by the mid-20th century as the United States and Soviet

Union took prominence. During the Cold War, Europe was divided along the Iron Curtain

between NATO in the west and the Warsaw Pact in the east. European integration led to the

formation of the Council of Europe and the European Union in Western Europe, both of

which have been expanding eastward since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Profile of European Market of Travel Industry

Through Europe is the world's second-smallest continent, European countries are attractive

destinations international tourists. Total outbound travel increased by an average of

2.7% per year between 2003 and 2006 to 327 million. Europe is the main destination

with a share of over 80%. Non-European destinations make up less than 20% of the

trips made by EU citizens. Between 2003 and 2006, the number of arrivals to European

destinations increased by an average of 1.7% per year. According to World Tourism

Organization, most of the top visited countries continue to be on the European continent.

The World Tourism Organization (WTO) predicts a total number international arrivals

are expected to reach 1 billion, and 1.6 billion of tourist arrivals from Europe in 2020.

This is a yearly increase of 6.1% starting from 2000. The most popular destinations will

be the Americas, followed by East Asia Pacific, the Middle East, Africa and South Asia.

Western Europe and Northern Europe are expected to be the most important

originating regions.

Common travel trends in Europe

Leisure travel

Rank Country UNWTO

Regional

Market

International

tourist

arrivals

(2008)[9]

International

tourist

arrivals

(2007)[3][9]

International

tourist

arrivals

(2006)[10]

1 France Europe 79.3 million 81.9 million 78.9 million

2 United States North

America

58.0 million 56.0 million 51.0 million

3 Spain Europe 57.3 million 58.7 million 58.2 million

4 China Asia 53.0 million 54.7 million 49.9 million

5 Italy Europe 42.7 million 43.7 million 41.1 million

6 United

Kingdom

Europe 30.2 million 30.9 million 30.7 million

7 Ukraine Europe 25.4 million 23.1 million 18.9 million

8 Turkey Europe 25.0 million 22.2 million 18.9 million

9 Germany Europe 24.9 million 24.4 million 23.5 million

10 Mexico North

America

22.6 million 21.4 million 21.4 million

Page 9: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 8

Leisure travel was associated with the Industrial Revolution in the United Kingdom –

the first European country to promote leisure time to the increasing industrial

population.

The British origin of this new industry is reflected in many place names. In Nice, France,

one of the first and best-established holiday resorts on the French Riviera, the long

esplanade along the seafront is known to this day as the Promenade des Anglais; in

many other historic resorts in continental Europe, old, well-established palace hotels

have names like the Hotel Bristol, the Hotel Carlton or the Hotel Majestic – reflecting the

dominance of English customers.

Winter tourism

Approximately 927 ski resorts are located in the various European countries (e.g.

Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Norway, Poland,

Sweden, Slovakia, Spain, and Switzerland)

Mass tourism

Mass tourism could only have developed with the improvements in technology,

allowing the transport of large numbers of people in a short space of time to places of

leisure interest, so that greater numbers of people could begin to enjoy the benefits of

leisure time.

Adjectival tourism

For a more comprehensive list, see List of adjectival tourisms.

Adjectival tourism refers to the numerous niche or specialty travel forms of tourism

that have emerged over the years, each with its own adjective. Many of these have come

into common use by the tourism industry and academics. Others are emerging concepts

that may or may not gain popular usage. Examples of the more common niche tourism

markets include:

* Agritourism

* Culinary tourism

* Cultural tourism

* Ecotourism

* Extreme tourism

* Geotourism

* Heritage tourism

* LGBT tourism

* Medical tourism

* Nautical tourism

* Pop-culture tourism

* Poverty tourism

* Religious tourism

* Space tourism

* War tourism

* Wildlife tourism

Page 10: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 9

2.3. Business Model

Holidays and trips can reach the final consumer in various ways. Business model

present how travel industry produce the values for their customers in order to receive

profit in return.

Outbound tour operators

In general, an outbound tour operator offers a complete package to the inclusive tour traveller,

consisting of transport (airline seats), accommodation (hotel), excursions and more. The

outbound tour operator, therefore, cooperates with an inbound tour operator in the destination

country who selects elements such as accommodation, catering and excursions. The outbound

tour operator offers the product via travel agencies or directly to consumers through the

Internet. It is becoming increasingly common that packages can be composed of individual

modules that the traveler can select him or herself.

Major and specialized tour operators

In general, two kinds of tour operators can be found: major tour operators and specialist tour

operators. Major tour operators generate most of their volumes through popular, standardized

mass-market products (sun, sea, sand). In the EU, a small number of mainly German and

British players dominate the tour operator market. Some examples are TUI (http://www.tui-

group.com), Thomas Cook (http://www.thomascook.com), Rewe/LTU (http://www.rewe-

touristik.com), First Choice (http://www.firstchoice.co.uk) and Kuoni

(http://www.kuoni.com).

Specialized tour operators concentrate on niche markets currently not being served by the

major operators. However, the tourism market is changing and major operators realize that

they will have to meet individual consumer demand to keep their clients. Some large tour

operators have set up specialized branches as well, operating under separate trade names, to

serve special segments in the market. Big and smaller players are all fighting for their market

position, resulting in fierce competition and, moreover, an increasing number of consumers

are looking for lower prices.

Member organizations

Another potential channel consists of member organizations, acting as tour operators. There

is an increasing tendency among organizations, clubs, sporting teams and/or more organized

parties to organize holiday trips and offer them to their members. They book all foreign

accommodation themselves and act as tour operators for their members. Another possibility

is to cooperate with a tour operator specialized in their field of interest.

Examples are clubs of mountaineers that go climbing together, diving clubs that travel to the

Antilles and fishermen who organize foreign fishing holidays together. Loyalty organizations,

such as the Dutch „Airmiles‟, can also be included in this channel.

Page 11: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 10

Inbound tour operators (local agents)

Inbound tour operators are the vital link between DC tourism suppliers and EU outbound tour

operators. Inbound tour operators represent local tourism suppliers, like hotels, bus

companies and organizers of activities and promote and sell travel packages to outbound tour

operators and travel agencies. According to interviews with EU tour operators, almost all

bookings take place through the intervention of an inbound tour operator.

Thomas Cook Business Model

TUI Business Model

Page 12: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 11

CAR RENTAL

COMPANIES

TRANPORT

BOAT

COMPANES

AIRLINE

FIRMS

TRAIN

COMPANY

MARKETING

MULTIMEDIA

COMPANIES

ADVERTISING

COMPANIES

PR

AGENCIES

ACCOMODATION

MOTELSHOTELS HOSTELSCAMPING

COMPANIES

CATERING

RESTAURENTSCATERING

COMPANIES

ENTERTAINMENT

VISTING

PLACESENTERTAIMENT

PLACES

ENTERTAINMENTAL

EVENT COMPANIES

INBOUND TOUR OPERATORS

OUTBOUND TOUR OPERATORS SPECIALISED TOUR OPERATERSMENBER

ORGANIZATIONS

TRAVEL AGENCIES

INCLUSIVE TOUR

TRAVELLERS

IDEPENDENT

TRAVELLERS

CLUBS

SPORT

TEAMS

ORGANIZED

PARTIES

Table 3.1: Travel Industry Business Model.

Page 13: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 12

2.4. Business partners in Travel industry (European market)

5.1 Firms in European Travel Industry

Travel and Tourism Company

Central-Eastern Europe Western Europe

Travel agents, tour

operators

7401 5431

Tourism promotion offices 663 398

Tourist coach services 1313 1169

Tourism and recreational

consultants

728 706

Tourist, leisure and sports

centers

2932 1233

Meeting and people finder

services

656 78

Accommodation

Central-Eastern Europe Western Europe

Hotels and motels 7167 15231

Hotel reservation services 1323 290

Hotel, restaurant and bar

operators

863 1251

Hotel, restaurant and

leisure property owners

700 168

Restaurants 7594 2633

Catering services 2277 3575

Holiday camps and tourist

complexes

1714 400

Page 14: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 13

Transportation

Central-Eastern Europe Western Europe

Airline companies 383 580

Coaches, buses, minibuses

hire & rent

426 1337

Ship. ocean-going

company

47 114

Travel Insurance

Central-Eastern Europe Western Europe

Travel insurance company 842 1082

2.5 Daughter companies of TUI and Thomas Cook TUI Travel PLC

TUI Travel has over 200 brands which are comprised of market- leading mainstream brands

and specialist travel businesses. Selections of our well-known brands include TUI, Thomson,

Fritidsresor, Nouvelles Frontières, The Moorings, Quark, LateRooms.com, Hotelbeds.com,

Hayes & Jarvis and Turchese.

Page 15: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 14

Page 16: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 15

Thomas Cook Group plc

Thomas Cook Group operates a portfolio of market-leading travel brands in 21 markets.

Page 17: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 16

2.6 Competitors of TUI and Thomas Cook In general, two kinds of tour operators can be found: major tour operators and specialist tour

operators. Major tour operators generate most of their volumes through popular, standardized

mass-market products (sun, sea, sand). In EU, a small number of mainly German and British

players dominate the tour operator market. Some examples of their main competitors are

Rewe/LTU, First Choice and Kuoni.

Specialized tour operators concentrate on niche markets currently not being served be the

major operators. However, the tourism market is changing and major operators realize that

they will have to meet individual consumer demand to keep their client. Some large tour

operators have set up specialized branches as well, operating under separate trade names, to

serve special segments in the markets. Big and smaller players are all fighting for their

market position, resulting in fierce competition and, moreover, an increasing number of

consumers are looking for lower prices. Below it is a rough picture of their competitors.

Page 18: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 17

Page 19: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 18

Page 20: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 19

Page 21: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 20

Chapter 3 Financial Analysis Introduction

In this chapter we are going to compare Thomas Cook Group PLC with TUI Travel PLC

from 2006 up to 2009. We will present a comparison of Key Figures from both companies

from 2006 to 2009. Which will present the significant differences between the two companies.

Then we will present a comparison of Profit and Loss Account of both companies, and we

will analyze deeper in matters of Profit Ratio, Liquidity Ratio, Leverage Ratio, Share Holder

Return Ratio, Revenue and Cost ratio, Underlying Revenue and Operating Profit compared to

the two company‟s Statutory Revenue and Operating Profit. An explanation of growth or

decrease of ratios or in variance between Underlying Revenue and / Underlying Operating

Profit compared to the Statutory Revenue and / Operating Profit will be given in each year.

We will also present a comparison between Thomas Cook Group PLC and TUI Travel PLC

Balance Sheet for 4 years from 2006 to 2007.

Please note that there will be some differences in value, and numbers from the data presented

and the analysis since some data were collected in different months and different sources.

Financial Performance Indicators

Profit Ratios

Profit ratios measure the efficiency with which the company uses its resources. The more

efficient the company, the greater is its profitability. It is useful to compare a company's

profitability against that of its major competitors in its industry. Such a comparison tells

whether the company is operating more or less efficiently than its rivals. In addition, the

change in a company's profit ratios over time tells whether its performance is improving or

declining. A number of different profit ratios can be used, and each of them measures a

different aspect of a company's performance. The most commonly used profit ratios are gross

profit margin, net profit margin, return on total assets, and return on stockholders' equity.

Liquidity Ratios A company's liquidity is a measure of its ability to meet short-term obligations. An asset is

deemed liquid if it can be readily converted into cash. Liquid assets are current assets such as

cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, and so on. Two commonly used liquidity

ratios are current ratio and quick ratio.

Leverage Ratios A company is said to be highly leveraged if it uses more debt than equity, including stock and

retained earnings. The balance between debt and equity is called the capital structure. The

optimal capital structure is determined by the individual company. Debt has a lower cost

because creditors take less risk; they know they will get their interest and principal. However,

debt can be risky to the firm because if enough profit is not made to cover the interest and

principal payments, bankruptcy can occur.

Page 22: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 21

3.1.1 Thomas Cook Group PLC and TUI Travel PLC Key Figures

Compared

KEY FIGURES1

Thomas Cook Group PLC

TUI Travel PLC

Year Ended 30 September 2009 2008 2007 2006 2009 2008 2007 2006

Earings Per Share Basic (p) 1.9 5.01 22 0.35 -1 -24.4 0.6 -37.48

Earings Per Share Diluted (p) 1.8 5.01 22 0.35 -1 -24.4 0.6 -37.48

Earings Per Share Adjusted (p) 26.4 26.26 39.9 0.25 23.8 20.4 14.4 17.16

Earnings Per Share Growth (%) n/a -34 60 n/a 17 42 -16 23

Total Dividend (p) 10.75 10.62 5 n/a 10.7 9.7 8.4 6.33

Operating Margin (%) 2 2 2 3 0 -1 0 -2

ROCE (%) -53 288 215 180 5 41 22 -20

Dividend Cover 2.46 2.47 7.98 n/a 2.22 2.1 1.71 2.71

Dividend Yield 4.6 4.8 1.7 n/a 4.2 4.5 3.3 3.2

Price / Earnings Ratio 8.8 8.4 7.5 n/a 10.7 10.6 17.5 11.6

Dividend Per Share Growth(%) 1 112 n/a n/a 10 15 33 -4

Comparison between the two key figures of the companies shows that Thomas Cook is

performing times better than TUI Travel PLC since after they are merged with MyTravel.

From the table TUI Travel PLC has earnings per share more than 400% lower than Thomas

Cook Group in 4 years in a row from 2006 to 2009. We can see that after both company are

merged, Thomas Cook is performing better in almost every aspect, except the price of the

stock in which TUI Travel PLC is higher than Thomas Cook Group PLC in several times of

the year, we can see the difference between the price in the graphs shown in the next page.

1 Source: http://www.redmayne.co.uk/

Page 23: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 22

This is the value of Travel and Leisure Sector in Millions of Euros, as it shows the Travel and

Leisure Sector starts declining from 2007 to the lowest point in around December 2008, and

this is mainly caused by the recent recess in economics in which we have just recovered from.

From the two price per share graph we can see that Thomas cook suffers greatly in December

2008, although TUI Travel PLC price drops, it didn‟t go as low as Thomas Cook‟s, and this is

due to TUI AG large Capital which makes the Stock still afloat when Thomas Cooks seems

to be sinking in December 2008.

Page 24: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 23

3.1.2 Profit & Loss Account Compared Profit & loss2 Thomas Cook Group PLC TUI Travel PLC

Year Ended 30 September 2009 2008 2007 2006 2009 2008 2007 2006

£ millions

Turnover 9268.8 8111.5 6404.5 7780.2 13863 13932 12839.9 12180.3

Operating Profit 164.2 134.7 151.8 239.5 28 -196 45.6 -252.3

Net Interest -102.1 -84.7 1.1 -25.4 -89 -83 -37.7 -25.8

Profit Before Tax 56.1 48.4 190.2 219 -52 -267 18.4 -268.6

Profit After Tax 18.3 43.6 150.7 179.8 -10 -267 6.9 -380.8

Total Dividend n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Retained Profit / Loss n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

A quick comparison between the profit between both company we can see immediately that

Thomas Cook is more profitable than TUI Travel PLC in 2006 to 2009, we will analyze the

profit margin between these two company later in this chapter.

The turnover / revenue of TUI Travel PLC is significantly higher than Thomas Cook Group

PLC, but we can see that TUI Travel PLC operating Profit is not as High as Thomas Cook

Group PLC.

From both companies we can see that both companies are losing Revenue as well as

Operating profit in 2007, in which they have just merged; TUI Travel merged with First

Choice, and Thomas Cook merged with MyTravel PLC. Although in 2008 Thomas cook

managed to gain back the revenue and still making a profit of £ 134.7 million, TUI Travel

PLC loses £ 196 million after the merger, details of the profit and loss will be explained in

the profit margin Analysis.

2 Source: http://www.redmayne.co.uk/

Page 25: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 24

3.1.3 Thomas Cook Group PLC and TUI Travel PLC Balance Sheet Compared

A quick summary from the 4 years Balance Sheet between TUI Travel PLC and Thomas

Cook Group PLC, we can immediately asses that Thomas Cook Group PLC has less Total

Assets compared to all TUI Travel PLC in 4 years. We will also analyze the Thomas Cook

strategy on Light Asset Operation in details in Return on Total Asset Analysis.

We will also analyze on TUI Travel PLC Fixed Investment such as new Boeing Planes the

company bought to anticipate the huge Increase in demand for long haul tourism , in which

the recession halt it.

3 Source: http://www.redmayne.co.uk/

Balance Sheet3 Thomas Cook Group PLC TUI Travel PLC

Year Ended 30 September 2009 2008 2007 2006 2009 2008 2007 2006

£ millions

Intangible Assets 3775.1 3438.1 2883.5 1214.3 4737 4429 4216.9 2463.4

Tangible Assets 975.4 897.1 835.3 875.4 964 926 1317.5 1522.7

Fixed Investments 56.3 72.1 62.3 63 189 170 145.5 92.9

Total Fixed Assets 5380.9 4943.3 4199.2 2508.9 6309 6005 6106.8 4720.9

Stocks 27 24.2 19.1 10.5 51 51 39.7 28.1

Debtors n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Cash at Bank and in Hand 550.2 761.3 622.3 736 790 1130 1958.7 1160

Total Assets 7071.3 7021.5 5817.4 3942.3 9149 9327 9649.4 8048.8

Creditors Amount Within 1 year 5214.1 5067.2 2482.2 2025 4764 8729 3999 3520.7

Creditors Amount After 1 year 403.4 285.5 321.5 510.9 624 467 522.4 621.5

Total Liabilities 5344.1 5013.1 3696.8 3344.2 6863 6731 7018.6 6228.1

Net Assets 1727.2 2008.4 2120.6 598.1 2286 2596 2630.8 1820.7

Net Current Assets n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Called Up Share Capital 57.7 59.8 66.1 303.7 112 112 111.8 n/a

Share Premium Account 8.9 8.9 6.8 539.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a

Other Reserves 2115.7 2192.4 1995.2 -22.7 2775 2749 2428.7 n/a

Profit and Loss Account -474 -265.4 44.2 -255.2 -604 -270 82.9 n/a

Shareholders’ Funds 1708.3 1995.7 2112.3 565.5 2283 2591 2623.4 1820.7

Minority Interests 18.9 12.7 8.3 32.6 3 5 7.4 n/a

Page 26: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 25

3.2 Profit Margin Analysis

3.2.1 Gross Profit Margin

Gross profit margin. The gross profit margin simply gives the percentage of sales available to

cover general and administrative expenses and other operating costs. It is defined as follows:

Gross Profit Margin = Sales Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold

Sales Revenue

Gross Profit Margin

THOMAS COOK GROUP PLC

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Gross Profit Margin 23.65% 23.19% 23.64% 23.31%

Revenue £m 9,268.80 £m 8,754.20 £m 6,399.854 £m 5,244.245

Cost Of Providing Tourism Services £m 7,076.50 £m 6,724.30 £m 4,886.756 £m 4,021.857

Gross Profit Margin

TUI TRAVEL PLC Pro Forma

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Gross Profit Margin 8.35% (0.0835)

7.33% (0.0733)

7.02% (0.702)

Revenue £m 13,863.00 £m 13,932.00 £m 12,839.90

Cost Of Providing Tourism Services

£m 12,705.00 £m 12,911.00 £m 11,800.40

3.2.2 Net Profit Margin

4 Converted from €m 9439.3 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

5 Converted from €m 7780.2 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

6 Converted from €m 7207.6 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

7 Converted from €m 5966.7 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

0.24

0.17

0.24 0.23

0.08 0.07 0.08

-

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

Year Ended 30/09/09Year Ended 30/09/08Year Ended 30/09/07Year Ended 30/09/06

Gross Profit Margin

Thomas Cook TUI

Page 27: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 26

Net profit margin. Net profit margin is the percentage of profit earned on sales. This ratio is

important because businesses need to make a profit to survive in the long run. It is defined as

follows:

Net Profit Margin = Net Income

Sales Revenue

Net Profit Margin

THOMAS COOK GROUP PLC

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Net Profit Margin 1.77% 1.22% 2.41% 2.82%

Net Income / Profit From operation £m 164.20 £m 107.10 £m 154.25 8 £m 147.94 9

Sales Revenue £m 9,268.80 £m 8,754.20 £m 6,399.85 10

£m 5,244.24 11

Net Profit Margin

TUI TRAVEL PLC

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Net Profit Margin 0.27% -1.32% 1.26% 0%

Net Income / Profit From operation £m 37.00 -£m 184.00 £m 161.90 £m 0

Sales Revenue £m 13,863.00 £m 13,932.00 £m 12,839.90 £m 0

8Converted from €m 227.5 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

9Converted from €m 218.2 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

10Converted from €m 9439.3 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

11Converted from €m 7780.2 based on Exchange currency on date from Apendix 2

0.00

(0.01)

0.01 0.02

0.01

0.02 0.03

(0.02)

(0.01)

-

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

Year Ended 30/09/09Year Ended 30/09/08Year Ended 30/09/07Year Ended 30/09/06

Net Profit Margin

Thomas Cook TUI

Page 28: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 27

3.2.3 Profit Margin Analysis

From the Chart we can see that Thomas Cook has more gross profit margin compared TUI

travel PLC, in 4 years straight even though TUI travel has almost 4 times the revenue of

Thomas Cook in 2006, but Thomas Cook gross profit margin is still more than 15% higher

than TUI. We believe that the huge difference between TUI Travel PLC and Thomas Cook

Group PLC gross profit margin is mainly on the cost of providing tourism services. The cost

for providing Tourism services from both company reach almost more than 80% of their total

revenue.

2007

In 2007, Thomas Cook Group PLC have just been merged with MyTravel PLC has bring the

Group pro forma revenue for the year was €11,714.5 million, a decrease of 1.3 per cent on

the prior year. Revenue decreased year on year in the UK (down €22.3 million), Continental

Europe (down €90.4 million), North America (down €124.8 million) and Corporate (down

€34.9 million). These decreases were offset by increases in Northern Europe (up €42.9

million) and Airlines Germany (up €73.4 million).12

The shortfall in gross margin, however, was more than offset by reductions in overhead costs,

such that the pro forma profit from operations increased by €32.3 million year on year.13

2008

In 2008, Thomas Cook Group PLC pro forma revenue for the period was £8,809.8m, an

increase of 11.8% on the prior year period. However, excluding the impact of translation and

acquisitions, Group revenue was flat year on year, with an underlying decrease in UK

revenue of 3% being offset by an increase in Northern Europe of 9%. The pro forma profit

from operations increased by 49.8% to £365.9m.14

TUI travel PLC has had an excellent first year (in 2008) as a merged company with

underlying operating profit up 53% and significantly improved profitability across the

business. The integration is progressing well and TUI now targeting £175m of synergies,

which is £25m higher than our previous target.

12,2 Taken from Thomas Cook Group Annual Report and Accounts 2007 3 Taken from Thomas Cook Group Annual Report 2008 4 Taken from Annual Report and TUI Accounts 2008

Page 29: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 28

TUI travel PLC delivered a £137m improvement in underlying operating profits to £398m in

2008, our first year as a fully merged business (2007: £261m). This has primarily been

achieved as a result of a strong performance in the UK driven by improved trading and the

delivery of synergies, a significant turnaround in France, further improvement in Nordics

from strong winter trading and improved summer trading in Germany and Austria. The

Specialist Sectors also contributed to the result through a combination of organic and

acquisition led growth.4

Even the underlying operating profit of TUI Travel PLC in 2008 after the merger raise up to

more than 58%, the company loss £m 184.00, and this is mostly due to :

• Restructuring expenses of £65.3m, which relate to restructuring programmes already in

progress prior to the merger, the integration of acquired businesses and further restructuring

activities to increase business efficiency.

• Merger-related integration costs of £164.3m, incurred as part of the integration programmes

across the UK Mainstream and Group and Global businesses affected by the merger.

As a result of its reclassification as a disposal group held for sale earlier in the year, a

goodwill impairment of 111.7m was recognised in respect of TUIfly, our airline in the

German source market. TUIfly has since been declassified as a disposal group held for sale.

Amortisation of business combination intangibles arising on the merger amounted to £80.0m

and is included within the 2008 total charge of £86.9m.15

2009

For the year 2009, Thomas Cook Group PLC revenue for the year was £9,268.8m, an

increase of 6% on the pro forma prior year. Excluding the impact of translation, Group

revenue was down 1%, reflecting reduced capacity in all our major markets, as we actively

managed the business through the global recession, offset by the year on year increase as a

result of acquisitions in this year and last. Profit from operations before exceptional items for

the year was £414.9m, an increase on the pro forma prior year of £49m, or 13%. As noted

above, capacity was reduced in all major markets as we sought to manage the Group through

the global recession. Trading was also adversely impacted by the swine flu outbreak,

increases in fuel prices year on year, and the weakening of sterling against the euro and dollar

which served to push up accommodation costs, particularly in our UK business. The adverse

15Taken from Annual Report and TUI Accounts 2008

Page 30: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 29

impact of the above was more than offset, however, by strong cost control, a year on year

foreign currency translation benefit, the realization of additional merger synergies and

contributions from acquisitions made this year and last.16

Thomas Cook Group revenue for 2009 was slightly lower than the prior year at £13,863m

(2008: £13,932m). Capacity reductions reduced underlying revenue by 14%, partially offset

by 4% higher selling prices, resulting in an organic revenue decline of 10%. Foreign currency

translation increased revenue by 9% due to Sterling weakness and revenue from acquisitions

resulted in a 1% increase over the prior year. The Group achieved a £45m improvement in

underlying operating profits to £443m in 2009 (2008: £398m). This improvement has

primarily been achieved by the delivery of integration synergies and the recovery of

scheduled flying losses in the UK and Germany. The improvement was partially offset by the

adverse impact on our French business of weaker demand and socio-political events in the

French West Indies and Madagascar, and weaker demand and excess market capacity in

Canada.17

There are huge difference (more than 15%)from Thomas Cook Group PLC and TUI Travel

PLC gross profit margin in 4 years in a row, which we can assume that Thomas Cook is

doing better than TUI since they have a rather high gross profit margin and steadily in around

20% in the last 4 years despite their revenue is by far lower than TUI Travel PLC.

The graph also clearly stated that TUI Travel PLC net profit margin is lower than Thomas

Cook Group PLC in the last 4 year, and we conclude that Thomas Cook is more profitable

than TUI in the tourism industry.

16 Taken from Thomas Cook Group Annual Report 2009 17 Taken from Annual Report and TUI Accounts 2009

Page 31: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 30

3.3 Return on total assets

Return on total assets. This ratio measures the profit earned on the employment of assets. It is

defined as follows:

Return on

Total Assets =

Net Income Available to

Common Stockholders

Total Assets

Return on total assets

THOMAS COOK

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Return on total assets 0.03 2.52%

0.05 5.09%

0.03 2.94%

0.05 4.81%

Net Income £m 178.10 £m 357.20 £m 166.15 £m 127.76

Total Assets £m 7,071.30 £m 7,021.50 £m 5,648.89 £m 2,657.31

Return on total assets

TUI

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Return on total assets 0.02 2.38%

0.04 3.98%

0.05 5.15%

0.07 7.17%

Net Income £m 218.00 £m 371.00 £m 497.00 £ m 119.30

Total Assets £m 9,149.00 £m 9,327.20 £m 9,649.40 £m 1,662.80

0.03

0.05

0.03

0.05

0.02

0.04

0.05

0.07

-

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

Year Ended 30/09/09Year Ended 30/09/08Year Ended 30/09/07Year Ended 30/09/06

Return On TotalAssets

Thomas Cook TUI Travel PLC

Page 32: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 31

3.3.1 RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS ANALYSIS

From The Graph we can see that the return of total assets from both companies are unstable,

unlike the revenue that raise in a stable rate over the years. We can also see that after Thomas

Cook Merged with MyTravel PLC in 2007 their Return On Total Assets drops quite

significantly, this is due to in September 2007, Thomas Cook Group PLC reached agreement

on the terms for Condor Flugdienst GmbH, the Group‟s German airline, to be merged into

Air Berlin plc. The merger is subject to approval by the Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel

Office), whose primary evaluation process is due to be completed by 7 April 2008. It is

intended that the merger will be completed in two stages – 75.1 per cent in February 2009

and 24.9 per cent in February 2010 or earlier. Thomas Cook Group will also receive new Air

Berlin shares with a value between €380 million and €475 million and a cash payment,

expected to be approximately €120 million, in respect of surplus cash held in Condor. The

deal is expected to be earnings-enhancing in 2008/09. Thomas Cook Group will experience

an estimated reduction in net financial debt of €185 million and in pension obligations of

€266 million.18

By looking at the graph we can assess that TUI Travel PLC Return on Total Asset trend is

going down from 7.17% in 2006 to only 2.53% in 2009. Thomas Cook Group PLC, managed

to climb up from 2.94% on 2007

to 5.09% in 2008, although the

margin drops back to 2.52% in

2009.

In 2007 Thomas Cook also has to

close 144 shops in UK and have

to rename 812 Shops into

Thomas Cook, which they

believe to meet their optimum

size.

Net assets at 31 October 2007

were €3,042.4 million (2006:

€598.1 million). The business combination of Thomas Cook AG and MyTravel has been

18, 2Taken From Thomas Cook Annual Report 2007

Page 33: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 32

accounted for on the basis that Thomas Cook AG is the acquirer. Consequently, the

MyTravel acquisition balance sheet has been the subject of a fair value exercise under IFRS 3.

This fair value exercise resulted in the recognition of goodwill and purchased intangibles of

€2,903.1 million, of which goodwill was €2,396.3 million, brand names, customer

relationships and other intangibles were €457.3 million and order backlog was €49.5 million.

Net funds at 31 October 2007 were €357.0 million (2006: €65.9 million).19

In matters of total asset, we can see that TUI Travel PLC, owns a total asset of £m 9,649.40

in 2007, almost twice Thomas Cook Group PLC after the Merger with MyTravel Group PLC.

Also, as we can see in the Balance sheet that TUI before the merger with First Choice in 2006,

has already had £m8048.8, and they only retained less than 2 million poundsterling of asset

from First Choice. Unlike Thomas Cook, in which in 2006 before the merger with MyTravel

Group PLC, has only £m 3942.3 and after the merger Thomas Cook Group PLC total asset

raise drastically to £m 5817.4. Apart from that Thomas Cook announced their new “Light

Asset, Content Heavy” Model in 2007.

Thomas Cook Group PLC have a more premium margin4, in which they have more

differentiated products, not depend on ownership. They gain access to more differentiated

products through strategic partnership. We can also see that Thomas Cook is more flexible in

the recent economic recession, since they have a light asset, and they also have lower

maintenance cost of their asset20

.

TUI Travel PLC Trend Keep Declining from 2006 (before the merger) until 2009. In 2008,

their return on total asset declined rapidly, are mostly because:

• Aircraft-related costs of £151.1m, which are primarily attributable to the loss on disposal of

19 aircraft included in the June sale and leaseback transaction.5

•Further information on the separately disclosed items is included in Note 3 of the

consolidated financial statements. As a result of its reclassification as a disposal group held

for sale earlier in the year, a goodwill impairment of £111.7m was recognised in respect of

TUIfly, our airline in the German source market. TUIfly has since been declassified as a

20,2,3 See appendices 2.2 4 Taken From TC_Final Presentation 2007 5 Taken from Annual Report and TUI Accounts 2008 6 Taken from Annual Report And TUI Accounts 2007

Page 34: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 33

disposal group held for sale. Amortisation of business combination intangibles arising on the

merger amounted to £80.0m and is included within the 2008 total charge of £86.9m.

Although Thomas Cook Group PLC maintains a Light Asset model, in 2008 Thomas Cook

Group PLC has Acquired 42 companies/ plants to be used as an asset and has been added to

the total asset. In the other hand, TUI Travel PLC has made 17 acquisition which cost

£220.0m in total3.

Although both companies has made quite a lot of Acquisitions in 2007, TUI Travel PLC

scores 5.15% in Return on total Assets compared to 2.94% of Thomas Cook Group PLC.

In 2008, TUI still on the way on finishing some acquisition in 2007, in which they still have

some equity adjustments for the remaining 50% shareholding in Société Polynésienne

Promotion Hotelière, a hotel operator within the Western Europe Mainstream sector and the

remaining 60% shareholding of Jet4You, a Moroccan airline. Both were previously equity

accounted entities for which a share of net liabilities had not been recognised under IAS 28

and IAS 316.

In conclusion, in Return on Total Assets Margin, Thomas Cook is performing better, and

more efficient than TUI Travel PLC, since the trend of TUI travel PLC continuesly declining

over the years, but Thomas Cook managed to get a significant incline due to their light asset,

in which cuts more cost of maintaining compared to TUI Travel PLC. Although in Overall

both companies trend are declining rapidly during the year, and if this continues to occur,

both companies may face bankruptcy.

Page 35: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 34

3.4 Return on (stockholders') equity

Return on stockholders' equity. This ratio measures the percentage of profit earned on common stockholders' investment in the company. In theory, a company attempting to maximize the wealth of it stockholders should be trying to maximize this ratio. It is defined as follows:

Return on Stockholders' Equity

= Net Income

Stockholders' Equity

Return On Shareholder Equity

THOMAS COOK

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Return On Stockholder Equity 0.10 (10%)

0.18 (18%)

0.08 (8%)

0.34 (34%)

Net Income £m 178.10 £m 357.20 £m 166.15 £m 127.76

Stockholder's Equity £m 1,708.30 £m 1,995.70 £m 2,054.68 £m 381.18

Return On Shareholder Equity

TUI

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Return On Stockholder Equity 0.10 (10%)

0.14 (14%)

0.19 (19%)

0.42 (42%)

Net Income £m218.00 £m371.00 £m497.00 £m 119.30

Stockholder's Equity £m2,283.00 £m2,591.00 £m2,623.40 £m 281.10

0.10

0.14 0.19

0.42

0.10

0.18

0.08

0.34

-

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

Year Ended 30/09/09Year Ended 30/09/08Year Ended 30/09/07Year Ended 30/09/06

Return On Stockholder's Equity

TUI Thomas Cook

Page 36: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 35

3.4.1 Return on Stockholder Equity Analysis.

As we can see from the graphs, Both TUI Travel PLC and Thomas Cook Group PLC,

RO(S)E trend is declining since the Merger. Although we can see that Thomas Cook Group

PLC manage to gain a margin of 0.18 after 2007, TUI Travel PLC trend seems to keep

declining, until they both meet at the same point of margin 0.10 in 2009. This trend certainly

does not look good, especially Investors are looking to invest in companies that have a high

ROE, which means they are high and growing.

There are quite significant changes in equity, in which we can see by the dividends paid by

both company to their shareholders each year.

2006

In 2006, before the merger between the tourism division of TUI AG and First Choice Limited

PLC, First Choice Limited PLC in 2006 The interim dividend in respect of the six-month

period to 30 April 2006 of 2.25p per share was paid on 1 November 2006 and this dividend

of £11.8m will be recognised as a deduction from equity in the year ending 31 October 2007.

Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Directors have proposed a final dividend of 5.4p per

share (2005: 4.65p) payable on 10 April 2007 to the holders of relevant shares on the register

at 9 March 2007. The final proposed dividend amounts to £28.3m (2005: £24.4m) and will,

after approval by shareholders, be recognised in the financial statements for the year ended

31 October 2007. The final ordinary dividend of 5.4p per share, together with the interim

dividend of 2.25p per share, makes a total dividend of 7.65p per share relating to the year

ended 31 October 2006 (2005: 6.6p).21

21 Taken from First Choice PLC Annual Report 2006

Page 37: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 36

With MyTravel PLC have just gone out of difficult times with loss more than Board was

unable to pay a dividend. Since then, we have taken the necessary measures to facilitate the

resumption of dividend payments. At an Extraordinary General Meeting on 26 May 2006, a

special resolution was passed by the Company‟s shareholders to reduce the Company‟s share

capital by way of a reduction in the share premium account. On 28 June 2006, this reduction

of capital was confirmed by an order of the High Court. The Company is now in a position to

pay dividends out of distributable profits earned from that date onwards. If the Board‟s

expectations for 2007 are achieved, the Board would expect to be in a position in December

2007 to propose the resumption of regular payments. Included within the above balances is

an amount of £66.8m (2005: £53.2m) held within escrow accounts in the United States and

Canada in accordance with local regulatory requirements. Also included within the above

balances is an amount of £55.4m (2005: £56.0m) of cash held by White Horse Insurance

Ireland Limited, the Group‟s captive insurance company. These balances are considered to be

restricted, however, regulatory approval is being sought for a loan of £11.6m and a dividend

of £3.2m to be paid in cash from

White Horse Insurance Ireland

Limited to MyTravel Group

plc.22

.

Before the merger with Thomas

Cook, My Travel PLC has was

not doing well in matters of

financial in the past 3 years

since 2003 until 2006 before the

merger23

.

In 2007 First Choice Directors have approved the company has paid an interim divdend of

24.643p per share (2006:5.4p) on

February 2008 to the company‟s parent company, TUI Travel PLC24

Also in2007, Thomas Cook „s basic and diluted earnings per share for

the year was € cents 33 (2006: € cents 35). To allow a more like-for-like comparison to the

prior year, earnings per share before exceptional items and amortisation of business

22 Taken from My Travel PLC Annual Report 2006 23 See appendices 2.3 24 Taken from First Choice PLC Financial Statement 2006

Taken From Thomas Cook Annual Report 2007

Page 38: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 37

combination intangibles has also been calculated. This was € cents 54 for 2007 (2006: € cents

25). However, it should be noted that the earnings per share figures noted here are impacted

by the weighted average number of shares in issue which are significantly lower for the

comparative period due to the nature of the merger transaction. As a result, management

believes that the adjusted earnings per share figures included within the pro forma financial

results and performance review section of this report are a better measure of return. Thomas

Cook Group PLC‟s profit after taxation for the period ended 31 October 2007 amounted to

€225.5 million. The Directors recommend a final dividend of 5p per ordinary share. No

interim dividend was paid during the period.25

2008

Thomas Cook pro forma

adjusted earnings per share

for 2008 the period was

24.1 pence compared with

17.1 pence in the pro forma

prior year period. Pro

forma adjusted earnings

per share has been

calculated using the pro

forma profit for the period,

before exceptional items and

amortisation of business

combination intangibles, divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue. For the

prior year period, the number of shares in issue at the end of the period was taken due to the

distortion caused by the merger. Adjustments have been made to reflect a normalised pre-

exceptional tax charge. The Board is recommending a final dividend of 6.5 pence per share,

for payment after, and subject to shareholder approval at, the Annual General Meeting to be

held on 19 March 2009.

This, together with the interim dividend of 3.25 pence paid on 5 September 2008, brings the

total dividend in respect of the period to 9.75 pence. Based on the adjusted earnings per share

figure noted above, this equates to a 41% payout ratio for the full year.

25 http://www.tui-group.com/fp/en/management_report/highlights_of_2007.html

Taken From Thomas Cook Group PLC Annual Report 2008

Page 39: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 38

In 2008, TUI Travel

PLC interim dividend

in respect of the 6-

month period to 31

March 2008 of 2.8p

was paid on the 1

October 2008 an d

this dividend of

£30.9m will be recognised as a deduction from equity in the year ending 30 September 2009.

Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Directors have proposed a final dividend of 6.9p per

share (2007: initial interim dividend of 5.9p per share) payable on 6 April 2009 to the holders

of relevant shares on the register at 13 March 2009. The final proposed dividend amounts to

£76.3m and will, after approval by shareholders, be recognized in the consolidated financial

statements for the year ending 30 September 2009. The final ordinary dividend of 6.9p per

share, together with the interim dividend of 2.8p per share, makes a total dividend of 9.7p per

share relating to the year ended 30 September 2008. The dividend for the 9-month period

ended 30 September 2007 comprises an interim dividend of 2.5p per share, which taken

together with the dividend paid

prior to the business combination

would result in a total dividend for

the year ended September 2007 of

8.4p per share. A dividend

reinvestment plan is in operation.

Those shareholders who have not

elected to participate in this plan,

and who would like to participate

with respect to the 2008 final dividend, may do so by contacting Equiniti direct on 0871 384

2030. The last day for election for the final proposed dividend is 23 March 2009 and any

requests should be made in good time ahead of that date.26

2009

26 Taken From TUI Travel PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2008

Page 40: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 39

In 2009, TUI travel PLC interim dividend in respect of the year ended 30 September 2009 of

3.0p per share was paid on 1 October 2009 and this dividend of £33m will be recognized as a

deduction from equity in the year ending 30 September 2010. Subsequent to the balance sheet

date, the Directors have proposed a final dividend of 7.7p per share (2008: final dividend of

6.9p per share) payable on 1 April 2010 to the holders of relevant shares on the register at 12

March 2010. The final proposed dividend amounts to £85m and will, after approval by

shareholders, be recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the year ending 30

September 2010. The final ordinary dividend of 7.7p per share, together with the interim

dividend of 3.0p per share, makes a total dividend of 10.7p per share relating to the year

ended 30 September 2009.27

In 2009, Thomas Cook board

is recommending a final

dividend of 7.0 pence per

share, which when combined

with the interim dividend of

3.75 pence per share paid on

4 September 2009, makes

atotal dividend for the year of

10.75 pence per share. This

recommendation reflects the

Group‟s financial achievement, the strength of our financial model and our commitment to

delivering value to shareholders. The total dividend for the year represents a payout of 41%

of adjusted diluted earnings per share and is in line with our policy, which remains to

increase dividends progressively, paying between 40% and 50% of adjusted earnings by way

of dividend. Once approved, the final dividend will be payable on 8 April 2010 to holders of

relevant shares registered on 19 March 2010.

The basic earnings per share before exceptional items (“adjusted earnings per share”) for the

year was 26.4p, an increase of 10% on the 2008 pro forma figure. The adjusted diluted

earnings per share for the year was 26.2p (2008 pro forma: 24.1p). The basic and diluted

statutory earnings per share was 1.9p and 1.8p respectively (2008 statutory: basic and diluted

of 4.6p). The Board is recommending a final dividend of 7.0p per share, for payment after,

27 Taken From TUI Travel PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2009

Page 41: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 40

and subject to shareholder approval at, the Annual General Meeting to be held on 25 March

2010. This, together with the interim dividend of 3.75p per share, brings the total dividend in

respect of the financial year to 10.75p. Based on the adjusted diluted earnings per share figure

noted above, this equates to a 41.0% payout ratio for the full year compared with a payout

ratio of 40.5% in the prior year.28

Thomas Cook performs better in return on stockholder‟s equity, which means Thomas Cook

are really well on reinvesting earnings to generate additional earnings. We can conclude that

Thomas Cook Group is more efficient even only slightly than TUI Travel. Thomas Cook is

more attractive to investor than TUI, since Thomas Cook ROE is higher.

28 Taken From Thomas Cook Annual Report 2009

Page 42: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 41

3.5 Liquidity Ratios

3.5.1 Current ratio

Current ratio. The current ratio measures the extent to which the claims of short-term creditors are covered by assets that can be quickly converted into cash. Most companies should have a ratio of at least 1, because failure to meet these commitments can lead to bankruptcy. The ratio is defined as follows:

Current Ratio = Current Assets

Current Liabilities

Current Ratio

THOMAS COOK Pro Forma

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Current Ratio 0.40 0.55 0.62 0.67

Current Assets £m 1,681.30 £m 2,078.20 £m 1,561.57 £m 934.37

Current Liabilities £m 4,166.30 £m 3,749.80 £m 2,534.30 £m 1,400.54

Current Ratio

TUI First Choice PLC

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Current Ratio 0.56 0.71 0.85 0.58

Current Assets £m 2,840.00 £m 3,322.20 £m 3,542.60 £m 572.00

Current Liabilities £m 5,091.00 £m 4,682.30 £m 4,151.00 £m 979.30

0.40

0.55 0.62

0.66

0.56

0.71

0.85

0.58

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

Year Ended 30/09/09Year Ended 30/09/08Year Ended 30/09/07Year Ended 30/09/06

Current Ratio

Thomas Cook TUI

Page 43: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 42

3.5.2 Current Ratio Analysis

The current ratio of both Thomas Cook Group PLC, and TUI Travel PLC shows that both of

these two company is not a very “liquid” company, especially for a one year period. The

graph clearly shows that these two companies‟ current ratio are below one, and their current

liability for the year is far greater than their current assets, which means these two companies

are not so good in their short term financial standing.29

Between Thomas Cook Group PLC, and TUI travel PLC current ratio, TUI ratio is higher

than Thomas Cook‟s, which after the merger between TUI tourism division and First Choice,

which in 2007 the balance sheet between TUI Tourism Division and First Choice has to be

combined, and also the debt of the consolidated balance sheet of TUI has to be added with the

debt of First Choice Group PLC. There were € 694 million funds raised from convertible

bonds, with a further € 150 million raised through private placements, the objective of the

funds it to safeguard the framework liquidity of general corporate financing.

With TUI Tourism Division merged with First Choice PLC, financial risk management

system, also cash management that was managed by TUI AG has to be splitted. TUI Travel

PLC now performs these functions for the tourism division in line with the unchanged risk

policy of the Group, while TUI AG continues to hold this function for all other business

activities of the Group.30

2007

TUI Travel PLC Current Asset in 2007 was lower than the previous year before the merger,

this is because there are a significant decrease in current asset, especially in cash and cash

equivalents31

, there has been a major decrease from £ 298.9 million (2006) to only £ 11.9

million (2007).32 Other than that, other items in the 2007 current asset are increasing, a

notable increase from 2007 is in the trade and other receivables and also assets classified as

held for sale which raise significantly from £ 88.0 million to £156.8 million. This amount is

80% accounted from sale of aircraft from Jet4You, and also Budget Travel Limited5.

Total current liabilities of TUI Travel PLC also increased approximately £ 500 million from

2006 to 2007 which mainly from trade and other payables. The increase was highly on

29 Current Ratio Definition: http://www.investorwords.com/1258/current_ratio.html 30 http://www.tui-group.com/fp/en/management_report/highlights_of_2007.html 31,4,5,6 See appendices 2.3 7 Thomas Cook Annual Report 2007

Page 44: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 43

creditors, which raise from only £ 79.8 million to £ 233.3 million in 2007, and TUI travel

PLC receives £ 240 million more from clients which received in advance6.

Thomas Cook in the other hand, has a huge increase of current asset in 2007 after the merger,

this is mainly due to Current asset securities of €366.7 million (2006: €72.7 million) include

€292.3 million (2006: nil) in relation to a managed investment fund established to optimize

the utilization of the Group‟s surplus liquidity. The fund is classified as held-for-trading

investments and includes corporate and government bonds (€239.4 million), quoted (€10.2

million) and unquoted (€37.6 million) securities and other assets (€5.1 million). Securities

also include money market deposits with a maturity of greater than three months of €74.4

million (2006: €72.7 million) which are also classified as held-for-trading investments.7

The average credit period taken on invoicing of leisure travel services is nine days (2006:

seven days). No interest is charged on the receivables. The credit risk in respect of direct

receivables from customers is limited as payment is required in full before the services are

provided. In the case

of travel services sold by third-party agents, the credit risk depends on the creditworthiness of

those third parties, but this risk is also limited because of the relatively short period of credit.

Deposits and prepayments include

amounts paid in advance to suppliers of

hotel and other services in order to

guarantee the provision of those supplies

and historically have covered periods

from one to 36 months in advance. The

Group‟s current policy is that deposits

and prepayments will normally only be

made for periods of up to 12 months in

advance. There is a credit risk in respect

of the continued operation of those

suppliers during those periods. Deposits and prepayments also include €78.4 million (2006:

€40.1 million) of deposits on aircraft lease arrangements which are primarily attributable to

the UK Airline.

Page 45: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 44

Securities include money market securities amounting to €5.5 million (2006: €5.2 million)

purchased as collateral against liabilities arising from part-time retirement contracts at

Thomas Cook AG.

Current asset securities of €366.7 million (2006: €72.7 million) include €292.3 million (2006:

nil) in relation to a managed investment fund established to optimise the utilisation of the

Group‟s surplus liquidity. The fund is classifi ed as held-for-trading investments and includes

corporate and government bonds (€239.4 million), quoted (€10.2 million) and unquoted

(€37.6 million) securities and other assets (€5.1 million). Securities also include money

market deposits with a maturity of greater than three months of €74.4 million (2006: €72.7

million) which are also classified as held-for-trading investments.

Loans include advances of €2.6 million (2006: €2.6 million) to two hotel companies in which

the Group has a participating interest. These loans are interest bearing at rates based on

Euribor and are unsecured. The amounts presented in the balance sheet are net of allowances

for doubtful receivables of €73.2 million (2006: €54.1 million). An allowance for impairment

is made where there is an identified loss event which, based on previous experience, is

evidence of a reduction in the recoverability of the cash flows.33

.

Thomas Cook did not have any current assets for sale in 2007, in which TUI Travel PLC has

to sell quite a lot of asset.34

2008

In 2008, Thomas Cook current ratio dropped from 0.62 to 0.55, this is due to a slight raise of

the current liabilities of £ 1200 million, and only £ 500 million on asset. More than £ 200

million on current asset derived from Trade and Other receivable, and around £ 163 million

in financial derivative35

Although the changes in the liabilities is 90% affected by the raise of

the foreign exchange, which causes interest rate swaps raise drastically form £69.1 million to

£ 523.5 million, which is almost 10 times from 20074.

The average credit period taken on invoicing of leisure travel services is eleven days (2007:

nine days). No interest is charged on the receivables. The credit risk in respect of direct

33 Taken From Thomas Cook Annual Report and Accounts 2007, see appendices 2.3 34,3,4 see appendices 2.3

Page 46: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 45

receivables from customers is limited as payment is required in full before the services are

provided. In the case of travel services sold by third party agents, the credit risk depends on

the credit-worthiness of those third parties, but this risk is also limited because of the

relatively short period of credit.

Deposits and prepayments include amounts paid in advance to suppliers of hotel and other

services in order to guarantee the provision of those supplies and historically have covered

periods from 1 to 24 months in advance. The Group‟s current policy is that deposits and

prepayments will normally only be made forperiods of up to twelve months in advance.

There is a credit risk in respect of the continued operation of those suppliers during those

periods. Deposits and prepayments also include

£63.3m (2007: £54.7m) of deposits on aircraft

lease arrangements which are primarily

attributable to the UK Airline.

Securities include money market securities

amounting to £3.7m (2007: £3.8m) purchased

as collateral against liabilities arising from part-

time retirement contracts at Thomas Cook AG,

which are classified as available-for-sale

financial assets. Current asset securities of

£129.2m (2007: £255.6m) include £129.2m

(2007: £203.8m) in relation to a managed

investment fund established to optimise the

utilisation of the Group‟s surplus liquidity. The fund is classified as held-for-trading

investments and includes corporate and government bonds of £129.2m (2007: £166.9m). In

the prior year there was also £7.1m quoted securities, £26.2m unquoted securities and £3.6m

other assets. Securities in the prior year also

included money market deposits with a maturity of greater than three months of £51.8m,

classified as held-for-trading investments.

Page 47: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 46

Loans include advances of £2.1m (2007: £1.8m) to two hotel companies in which the Group

has a participating interest. These loans are interest bearing at rates based on Euribor and are

unsecured.36

2009

For the year 2009 we can see that both TUI Travel PLC and Thomas Cook Group PLC,

current ratio is declining. TUI Travel PLC Ratio in 2009 is 0.56 declined from 0.71 and also

Thomas Cook Group PLC declined from 0.55 to 0.40. Both TUI and Thomas Cook current

asset is declining, but both of their liabilities are raising. This makes the current ratio declined

drastically.

Thomas Cook‟s current asset in 2009 were lower than 2008, in which this was caused by a

decrease in cash and cash equivalent, which largely comprise bank balances denominated in

sterling, euro and other currencies for the purpose of settling current liabilities as well as

balances arising from agency collection on behalf of the Group‟s travel agencies.

Included within the above balances is an amount of £46.2m (2008: £56.4m) held within

escrow accounts in the United States and Canada in respect of local regulatory requirements.

Also included within the above balances is an amount of £13.6m (2008: £55.0m) of cash held

by White Horse Insurance Ireland Limited, the Group‟s captive insurance company, and

£0.4m (2008: £15.7m) held in other securities. These balances are considered to be

restricted37

.

Another decrease in trade and other receivables in 2009 which constitute of £ 90 million,

mostly from securities, which in 2007 was £129.2 million and in 2009 is none, and a decrease

of £50 million in other receivables.

The average credit period taken on invoicing of leisure travel services is 14 days (2008: 11

days). No interest is charged on the receivables. The credit risk in respect of direct

receivables from customers is limited as payment is required in full before the services are

provided. In the case of travel services sold by third-party agents, the credit risk depends on

the credit worthiness of those third parties, but this risk is also limited because of the

36 Taken from Thomas Cook Annual Report and Accounts 2008, see appendices 2.3 37 Taken from Thomas Cook Annual Report and Accounts 2009, see appendices 2.3

Page 48: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 47

relatively short period of credit.

Deposits and prepayments include amounts paid in advance to suppliers of hotel and other

services in order to guarantee the provision of those supplies and historically have covered

periods from 1 to 24 months in advance. The Group‟s current policy is that deposits and

prepayments will normally only be made for periods of up to twelve months in advance.

There is a credit risk in respect of the continued operation of those suppliers during those

periods. Deposits and prepayments also include £65.0m (2008: £63.3m) of deposits on

aircraft lease arrangements which are primarily attributable to the UK Airline.

Securities include money market securities amounting to £4.0m (2008: £3.7m) purchased as

collateral against liabilities arising from part-time retirement contracts at Thomas Cook AG,

which are classified as available for sale financial assets.

In the prior period, current asset securities of £129.2m consisted of a managed investment

fund established to optimise the utilisation of the Group‟s surplus liquidity. The fund was

classified as held-for-trading investments and consisted of corporate and government bonds.

These securities were disposed of during the current year.

In the prior period, loans included advances of £2.1m to two hotel companies in which the

Group had a anticipating interest. These loans were interest bearing at rates based on Euribor

and were unsecured. The advances were settled in full during the year.38

In May 2008, the Group entered into a €1.8bn committed credit facility maturing in May

2011. The facility comprises term loan, revolving credit and bonding facilities. €320m of the

revolving credit facilities were originally made available for the Group in respect of the

proposed transaction between Condor and Air Berlin. During the year, the Group entered into

an agreement with its lenders to change the designation of this portion of the facility to enable

it to be used to meet the aircraft refinancing needs of the Group. This re-designation became

effective on 1 October 2009 and the facilities were fully available to the Group from this date.

Amounts are repayable under the term loan facility at fixed intervals with a final bullet

payment at maturity. As at 30 September 2009, the Group had repaid a total of €75m of term

loans.

38 Taken from Thomas Cook Annual Report and Accounts 2009, see appendices 2.3

Page 49: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 48

The Directors consider that the fair value of the Group‟s borrowings with a carrying value of

£940.0m is £943.9m (2008: carrying value £772.1m; fair value £770.0m). The fair values

quoted were determined on the basis of the interest rates for the corresponding terms to

maturity or repayment as at the period end. For items maturing in less than one year, the

Directors feel that the fair value is equal to the carrying amount39

.

For TUI Travel PLC, in 2009 the current asset drops £ 500 million but the current liabilities

raise for more than £ 500 million. The drop in the current asset can be explained by a

decrease of £ 120 million in trade and other receivables, a decrease of £ 380 in cash and cash

equivalent. Cash and cash equivalents includes £60m (2008: £46m) that is not available for

immediate use by the Group. This is made up of monies held to meet regulatory requirements

plus cash balances on short term deposits held on a restricted basis by the Group‟s captive

insurance funds as part of their ongoing operations.

Other current investments disclosed on the consolidated balance sheet comprise deposit

balances held to meet regulatory requirements with a term exceeding three months40

.

TUI Travel PLC decrease in current liabilities is also because a significant decrease in asset

held for sale which in 2008 was more than £ 135 million to only £ 67 million, The disposal

group assets and liabilities held for sale comprise the Canadian Mainstream business at 30

September 2009 and Société d‟Investissement Aérien S.A. (Jet4You) at 30 September 2009

and 30 September 2008. Jet4You is included within the Western Europe segment and the

Canadian Mainstream Business

is included in the Northern

Region. The Canadian

Mainstream business is

classified as held for sale on

the basis of the announced joint

venture transaction with

Sunwing Travel Group Inc.

Jet4You is presented as held

for sale at the current and or

39 Taken from Thomas Cook Annual Report and Accounts 2009, see appendices 2.3 40,2,3 Taken from TUI Travel PLC annual Report 2009, see appendices 2.3

Page 50: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 49

year end, based on the active disposal process for the business which is progressing and

which the Directors expect to complete within 12 months.

Aircraft held for sale relate to the Northern Europe and Central Europe Mainstream segments.

In the year ended 30 September 2009, an impairment charge of £1m (2008: £31m) has been

taken to record these property, plant and equipment assets at the lower of their carrying value

and fair value less costs to sell. The impairment charge is included within separately

disclosed restructuring expenses and aircraft items (Note 3).

During the prior year, four aircraft were purchased but were not sold and leased back until the

first quarter of the current year ended 30 September 2009. The four aircraft were therefore

classified as held for sale at 30 September 2008 until their disposal for a total of £90min the

current year. The disposal proceeds are included within „Proceeds from sale of property, plant

and equipment‟ on the consolidated cash flow statement2.

Beside of that, there is a huge increase in borrowings in 2009 in TUI Travel PLC is from £ 99

million to £ 327 million, which they have to increased their shareholding from 51% to 70%

on the exercise of part of one of the options. The remainder of this put option over 20% of the

shares may be exercised at any time until 2015. A further put option at a fixed price with no

time limit has been written by the Group during the year to the same minority shareholder for

the remaining 10% shareholding3.

In conclusion, both companies in 2009 are trying to cover the expenses they have made from

the years before by borrowing from banks, and from shareholders. Especially TUI Travel

have to cover the losses and pay the shareholders. We can see that in this case (current ratio)

TUI performs better than Thomas Cook Group PLC since Thomas Cook seems to be cutting

down on cash at hand, which make Thomas Cook‟s current asset decline drastically.

Although both companies have borrowings, Thomas Cook‟s loans is twice as much from TUI

Travel PLC for 4 years.

Page 51: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 50

3.6 Leverage Ratios

3.6.1 Debt-to-assets ratio41

Debt-to-assets ratio. The debt-to-asset ratio is the most direct measure of the extent to which

borrowed funds have been used to finance a company's investments. It is defined as follows:

Debt-to-Assets Ratio = Total Debt

Total Assets

Debts-to-assets ratio

THOMAS COOK

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Debts-to-assets ratio 18.46% 17.68% 11.29% 12.78%

Total Debt £ 3,396.00 £ 3,480.00 £ 1,737.00 £ 1,518.00

Total Assets £6,639,500.00 £6,689,800.00 £5,500,386.00 £ 4,997,333.00

Debts-to-assets ratio

TUI

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Debts-to-assets ratio 12.62% 13.88% 23.16%

Total Debt £ 3,903.00 £m 6,845.00 £m 6,410.00

Total Assets £k 9,481,600.00 £k9,122,000.00 £k 8,938,000.00

41 Data from http://www.selftrade.co.uk/company-tui-travel---1uTT..L , http://www.selftrade.co.uk/quote-thomas-cook---1uTCG.L#

12.62%13.88%

23.16%

-

18.46%17.68%

11.29%12.78%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

Year Ended 30/09/09Year Ended 30/09/08Year Ended 30/09/07Year Ended 30/09/06

Debts to Asset - Ratio

TUI Thomas Cook

Page 52: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 51

3.6.2 Debt to Asset Ratio analysis

The debt to ratio sows the proportion of a company‟s assets which are financed through debt.

If the ratio less than one, most of the company‟s assets are financed through equity. If the

ratio is greater than one most of the company's assets are financed through debt. Companies

with high debt/asset ratios are said to be "highly leveraged," and could be in danger if

creditors start to demand repayment of debt.

The debt to asset ratio for Thomas Cook and for TUI Travel PLC for the last 4 years, is

rapidly changing. We can see that Thomas Cook Group PLC in 2006 to t2007debt to asset

ratio was declining slightly, but in 2008 the ratio drastically increase to 17.68% from 11.29%

and continuously grew to 18.46% in 2009. Unlike Thomas Cook Group PLC, TUI Travel

PLC Debt to asset ratio declined for 10% from 23.16% in 2007 to merely 13.88% in 2008,

and steadily declining to 12.62% in 2009, a significant change, in which the ratio were mostly

affected by the loans that TUI Travel PLC made, and paid, the major changes has been

explained in details in return on total asset analysis. The major changes that happens in terms

of total assets has been explained in return on total asset analysis for Thomas Cook Group

PLC.

In brief, both Thomas Cook and TUI Travel PLC investments on assets are financed through

debts, since the margin are quite high, we can say that Thomas Cook and TUI Travel PLC are

highly leveraged since most of the company‟s assets are financed through debts42

.Although

both companies are highly in debt, TUI Travel PLC still better than Thomas Cook in this

matter, since TUI has less debt than Thomas Cook. These companies will be in danger if their

creditors start to demand a repayment of debt.

42 http://www.investorwords.com/5497/debt_asset_ratio.html

Page 53: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 52

3. 6.3 Debt-to-equity ratio43

Debt-to-equity ratio. The debt-to-equity ratio indicates the balance between debt and equity in a company's capital structure. This is perhaps the most widely used measure of a company's leverage. It is defined as follows:

Debt-to-Equity Ratio = Total Debt

Total Equity

Debts-to-equity ratio

THOMAS COOK

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Debts-to-equity ratio 0.72 71.74%

0.60 59.25%

0.29 29.47%

0.72 71.74%

Total Debt / Net Debt £m 3,396.00 £m 3,480.00 £m 1,737.00 £m 3,396.00

Total Equity £m 1,727.20 £m 2,008.40 £ m 2,062.75 £ m1,727.20

Debts-to-equity ratio

TUI

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Debts-to-equity ratio 0.49 49.41%

0.48 48.88%

0.83 83.71%

Total Debt / Net Debt £m 6,903.00 £m 6,845.00 £m 6,410.00

Total Equity £m 2,283,000.00 £m 2,591,000.00 £ m 2,623,500.00

43 Data from http://www.selftrade.co.uk/company-tui-travel---1uTT..L , http://www.selftrade.co.uk/quote-thomas-cook---1uTCG.L#

0.720.59

0.290.360.490.49

0.84

- 0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Year Ended 30/09/09Year Ended 30/09/08Year Ended 31/10/07Year Ended 31/10/06

Debts to Equity - Ratio

Thomas Cook TUI

Page 54: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 53

3.6.4 Debts to Equity Ratio Analysis

Debt to equity measures a company‟s financial leverage. Debt/equity ratio is equal to long-

term debt divided by common shareholders' equity. Typically the data from the prior fiscal

year is used in the calculation. Investing in a company with a higher debt/equity ratio may be

riskier, especially in times of rising interest rates, due to the additional interest that has to be

paid out for the debt44

.

From the graph we can see that after the merger (2007) TUI Travel PLC financed their

investment through debt, and Thomas Cook Group PLC uses more equity than debt to

finance their investment. In 2008, TUI reduces their debt until almost half (0.49 from 0.84)

but Thomas Cook debt has raised from 0.29 to 0.59 in 2008. This significant changes in the

debt is to complete some acquisition in the year, which we have explained in Return on

Stockholder Equity analysis.

In 2009, TUI Travel PLC managed to keep their margin to be stable, in which Thomas Cook

has earned more debt in the following year Thomas Cook raise on debt to equity margin is

mainly because of their total equity value drops, and there has been a significant decrease in

the cash at hand in their current ratio, which has been explained in detail in the return on total

asset analysis.

In brief, TUI Travel PLC performs better in debts to equity ratio, which TUI did not use as

much debt as TUI to invest on their assets. TUI Travel PLC uses their shareholder equity

more to invest on the assets they have, since TUI Travel PLC main objective is to retain

assets, and Thomas Cook‟s goal was to reach as high as possible on gross profit margin, but

in return, they have to pay debts and borrowings which will need to be paid in 1 to 10 years

time.

44 http://www.investorwords.com/1316/debt_equity_ratio.html

Page 55: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 54

3.7 Financial Analysis Summary

Page 56: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 55

TUI TRAVEL PLC THOMAS COOK GROUP PLC

Page 57: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 56

Taken From : http://www.selftrade.co.uk/quote-thomas-cook---1uTCG.L#

TUI TRAVEL PLC THOMAS COOK GROUP PLC

Page 58: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 57

3.7.1 Financial Analysis Conclusion From the financial point of view, our group has made a conclusion that Thomas Cook Group

PLC performs better than TUI Travel PLC in some very essential part. Thomas Cook scores

better in profit margin, both gross profit margin and net profit margin, which makes Thomas

Cook is more profitable than TUI Travel PLC.

We can also see that the profit that Thomas Cook made is much more than TUI Travel. TUI

Travel had not been very profitable since the last 4 years, in fact they are losing money each

year and more every year since they merged with First Choice.

Thomas Cook also performs slightly better than TUI Travel in terms of return on total assets,

in which TUI Travel return on total assets margin are declining steadily from 2007 to 2009.

Thomas Cook also performs better in return on stockholder‟s equity in which Thomas Cook

are really well on reinvesting earnings to generate additional earnings. We can conclude that

Thomas Cook Group is more efficient even only slightly than TUI Travel. Thomas Cook is

more attractive to investor than TUI, since Thomas Cook ROE is higher.

Although TUI Travel PLC is not profitable compared to Thomas Cook, and also the return on

Equity is lower, TUI Travel have a higher current asset ratio compared to Thomas Cook.

Thomas Cook also had quite a lot of debt, mainly long term, but Since this margin is

ignoring TUI Travel liabilities. And it also means that TUI Travel is more liquid than Thomas

Cook Group PLC, and is more efficient on meeting short term debt obligations, and TUI

Travel is relatively better in short term financial standing.

Although both companies are highly in debt, TUI Travel PLC still better than Thomas Cook

in this matter, since TUI has less debt than Thomas Cook. These companies will be in danger

if their creditors start to demand a repayment of debt.

TUI Travel PLC performs better in debts to equity ratio, which TUI did not use as much debt

as TUI to invest on their assets. TUI Travel PLC uses their shareholder equity more to invest

on the assets they have, since TUI Travel PLC main objective is to retain assets, and Thomas

Cook‟s goal was to reach as high as possible on gross profit margin, but in return, they have

to pay debts and borrowings which will need to be paid in 1 to 10 years time.

Page 59: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 58

Chapter 4: Marketing

4.1. Mission statement:

“A Mission Statement of the organization’s purpose – what it wants to accomplish in the

larger environment”45. A mission statement also should be the guideline of the

company´s marketing orientation. In matter of Mission Statement, TUI Travel PLC and

Thomas Cook Group PLC have different perspectives.

Under the global vision “WE GO FURTHER TO MAKE DREAMS COME TRUE”, Thomas

Cook states itself with four different missions based on five main divisions: UK & Ireland,

Continental Europe and Airlines Germany, Northern Europe, North America. The

differences in the Thomas Cook ´s Mission Statements in different divisions are related

on its flexible business models and concentrated marketing strategy for every different

geography market.

Conversely, TUI travel plc does not public any mission statement. Being confident about

the reputations as one of the market leaders in Tourism industry, the Leader of TUI

believed it is not essential to have a sentence to describe company's function, markets

and competitive advantages; and state its business goals and philosophies, which have

already become the famous concepts. “TUI Travel PLC does not have a Mission Statement.

We have a stated strategy which is to create superior shareholder value by being the

world’s leading leisure travel group providing customers with a wide choice of

differentiated and flexible travel experiences to meet their changing needs To enable us to

achieve this goal we have identified four key strategic imperatives which are linked to our

KPIs.”46

In our group opinion, a mission statement is the fundamental guideline of the company.

A mission statement defines what an organization is, why it exists, its reason for being.

At a minimum, a mission statement should define who primary customers are, identify

the products and services the company produce, and describe the geographical location

in which company operate. Specializing mission statement for each business divisors,

45 TUI Travel Annual Report 2009 46 FAQS. TUI Travel plc. Retrieved from http://www.tuitravelplc.com/tui/pages/investors/shareholderinfo/faqs

• Exceptional Service From Exceptional People

UK & Ireland

• To perfect the personal leisure experience.

Continental Europe and

Airlines Germany

• Further we go to make dreams come trueNorthern Europe

• To be the best travel company in the world to travel with, work for, and

invest in North America

Page 60: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 59

Thomas Cook creates itself more advantages in communication with not only customers,

investors but also the company´s employees. All of these elements are extremely critical

in strengthen the firms ‘position in the core markets, and expand and develop business

in the new markets.

4.2. SWOT Analysis:

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Strengths Market leader in the tourism industry. Be a part of TUI AG, an international cooperation, which is operating business in Travel, Hotels and Resorts, Cruises, and major share holder in Container shipping (43.33% holding in Hapag-Lloyd). Unique media methods in marketing (TUI song: Let´s make people smile). Strong multi-channels distribution focusing on online sales. Delivering high quality customers services. Stable and management-friendly shareholders.

Scale (22m passengers out of 21 source markets). Portfolio of strong brands

Speed of decision making and implementation

Industry leading margins

Tailored business model in each market Strong multi-channel distribution capability Asset light model Strong and improving financial position Positive customer feedback: 97% customer satisfaction; 96% would recommend TCNE. Unique concept hotels. No1 market share of Canaries, Majorca, Turkey, Egypt and Rhodes. 25years average industry experience.

Strong partnerships.

Weakness Company registered a net loss of EUR 142 million in 2008 (Annual Report 2008) Major reduction in the

Has no customer retention policy. Has little or no scope outside of Europe.

Page 61: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 60

volume of holiday packages because of recession and financial uncertainties Heavy Fixed Assets lead to the lack of flexibility and reduce the competition ability when the economic climate has high level of uncertainty. (Fixed assets cover 34% of total assets) Maintaining too many different brand names makes the company’s marketing and management expenses become too high.

Lack of service, flexibility and business focus (such as frequent flyer programmes) make the low-cost model unappealing for most business travelers. The two drivers of growth, the focus on price and the focus on convenience (frequent flights, few connections, more nearby airports) are reaching their natural limits. Differentiation from there remains to be difficult. Easy Jet’s own success makes it difficult to recruit and train staff quickly enough

Opportunities Expansion in developing markets such as India and China. Business expansion through further acquisition and mergers. Recovery signs of the world economic after economic recession.

Experts predict great potential for future growth in the next years. The current recession is favorable as people and businesses are more cost-conscious.

More full-service airlines may withdraw from the regional market to focus on more profitable long-haul routes leaving the market to the low-cost operators.

Page 62: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 61

Threats Changing consumer behavior in his global economic recession can influence company’s strategy. Threat of losing consumers who want a low-cost packagers because company’s focus on luxury hotels. Competitors, such as Thomas Cook, are more flexible in business models and strategies.

Competition is likely to intensify, given the saturated market and the shortage of other options. Increased competition is likely to lead to greater difficulties in demanding incentives from communities. Companies cut on business travel in times of economic downturn and because of new time-consuming security measures travel substitutes like videoconferencing are introduced.

4.3. Strategic Objectives:

The company’s statement needs to be turned into the Strategic Objectives, which

include business objective and marketing objective to guide management. Based on the

company global vision, both Thomas Cook and TUI set up the clear clear strategic goals.

Thomas Cook’s strategic goals are built around our vision of going further to make dreams come true. The strategic objective: “STRENGTHENING OUR BUSINESS AND INVESTING FOR GROWTH” is developed in four growth drivers: Maximize value of

mainstream, Become leading independent travel provider, Become the leading UK travel-related financial services provider, and Capture growth and value through mergers & acquisitions and partnerships.

Maximize value of mainstream:

• Product mix

• Leverage brands

• Multi-channel distribution

• Capacity reduction

• Reduced costs via flexibility

• Maximize consolidation

benefits

• Further consolidation

Leading independent travel

Page 63: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 62

provider:

• Substantial business today

• ‘One-stop-shop’ proposition

• E-commerce led via website, but multi-channel

• Wholesale and retail distribution

• Emerging markets growth

Leading UK travel-related financial services provider:

• Network expansion UK

• TC brand

• FX, Insurance & Credit Card

• Cross selling

• High street led, but multi-channel

• FX price proposition

• Insurance regulatory environment

M&A opportunities in the following areas:

• Developing markets

• Consolidation in mature markets

• Capture further value in profitable products

• Independent travel

• Financial Services

TUI travel plc builds up itself a more specific strategic goal, which is emphasized on the

values of the shareholders and customers. “Creating superior shareholder value by being

the world’s leading leisure travel group providing customers with the widest choice of

differentiated and flexible travel experiences to meet their changing needs.”

TUI’s strategy is focused on four areas – Product & Content, Distribution & Brands, People & Operational, Effectiveness and Growth & Capital Allocation

Page 64: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 63

Imperative 1: Product & Content

• Different products to our competitors and unique in the marketplace: developing a

portfolio of exclusive products that no competitor can match or replicate and which is

tailored to include additional services and facilities that customers want on their

holiday.

• High customer retention and repeat booking rates.

• Earlier booking trends: increases yields and removes pressure in the late market,

while customers also benefit from a more added-value, unique experience.

Imperative 2: Distribution & Brands • Highly trusted brands that provide value and quality: highly trusted brands

provide excellent value for money and drive customer loyalty and repeat

bookings.

• Broadening customer choice: provide customers with a wide choice of holiday

options that meet their preferences, and a convenient range of booking options,

• Building our customer relationships: the distribution of products, in each

source market,

is tailored to reflect different customer preferences and market dynamics. Each

source market has its own distribution strategy, which aims to reduce costs by

building controlled distribution through the efficient operation of retail shops,

the use of the internet as a research and booking tool and by the utilisation of call

centres.

Imperative 3: People & Operational Effectiveness • People are key to success. • Flexible business model that can react to demand changes. • Development of sophisticated capacity and yield management systems. • Underlying operating profit margin up 30 basis points from 2.9% to 3.2%. • Integration progressing well with total synergies upgraded to £200m.

Imperative 4: Growth & Capital Allocation

• Acquired 11 niche high-growth businesses in Specialist Sectors. • Growth plans are progressing well in Russia & CIS. • Consolidation of the Canadian market through a proposed strategic venture with Sunwing. • Underlying operating profit up 11% to £443m. • Increase in return on invested capital to 9.2%.

In matter of Strategic Objectives, we think that TUI have better customer oriented image.

Due to the fact, TUI considers the customers values and relationships as the critical

element. It means the company concerns more about market place understandings and

customer’s needs; design value creating marketing strategies, deliver customer

satisfaction, and build strong customer relationship. In return, TUI can improve its sale

Page 65: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 64

profit and earn customer loyalty. TUI “creates value for customers and shareholders in

order to capture value form customers in return”47.

4.4. Market position:

TUI and Thomas Cook operate in the five five geographic segments UK & Ireland,

Continental Europe and Airlines Germany, Northern Europe, North America, and

Emerging Markets ( Eastern Europe, Japan,China and India). They both

are the market leaders in these markets.

TUI is doing business in a larger market, which includes 27 Source Markets48:

Australia

Austria

Belgium

Canada

China

Czech

Republic

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Hungary

Italy

India

Ireland

Luxembourg

Netherlands

Norway

New Zeleand

Poland

Russia

Slovenia

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

United

Kingdom

United States

Ukraine

Compare with the number of Thomas Cook operating markets is 21 countries49

Market dynamics:

While the outlook remains

challenging there are signs of

recovery in consumer confidence.

However, the weakness of sterling

versus the euro and US dollar is

expected to increase input costs

and to continue to affect consumer

sentiment.

Before the mergers in 2007,

TUI Thomson and First Choice) and

Thomas Cook had already been the leading players of UK travel leisure market,

who held the biggest market shares.

47 48 49

Page 66: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 65

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers50 5.687m 7.6m (Including UK, Ireland, Middle East, and India)

Controlled distribution51

2009 78%

2008 75%

2009 68.6%

2008 67.4%

Market position

Mainsteam sector: #1 (34% market share)52

Mainsteam sector: #2

Financial services (Foreign Exchange market): #4 (7% market share)

Financial services (Foreign Exchange market): #3 (15% market share)

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to

• Target further mainstream margin improvement through product and haul mix. • Develop our e-commerce strategy and move into the online travel agency market.

50 51 52

Page 67: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 66

align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

• Continue to grow travel-related financial services, notably foreign exchange. • Build on our strong performance in key medium haul destinations outside the Eurozone.

Key Brands

Page 68: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 67

Market dynamic:

Following tough trading conditions in the

2009 financial year, GDP forecasts for

2010 are ahead of previous expectations

helping to improve consumer sentiment.

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers53 9.73m (Including Germany) 7 m Controlled distribution54

2009 46%

2008 40%

2009 38.3%

2008 37.7%

Strategy Expanding the tour operator business in growth markets like Russia and Ukraine. Expanding the market share in the German-speaking volume market for cruises. Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

• Increase sales of exclusive and differentiated product to maintain margin advantage. • Continue to grow online distribution channels and improve dynamic packaging capabilities. • Increase sales to medium haul destinations such as Turkey and North Africa.

Key Brands

53 54

Page 69: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 68

Market Dynamic:

• The UNWTO expects oral customer

spending to decline by 4-6%.

• 3 major players; consolidated market

•Limited dependency on third party

travel agents

•High online penetration

•Most local LCCs¹ regional only or loss making Kuoni buying smaller players

• Thomas Cook5: 2010 is likely to be challenging as the weakness of the Swedish krona

puts significant pressure on margins, and on long haul holidays.

• TUI: adding capacity recently, during 2009, the level of differentiated product offered

by the Nordics business increased by four percentage points to 41%. This was driven by

the opening of a new eco-friendly Blue Village in Rhodes and the creation of a new

concept, Blue Unique, with 20 small unique hotels in several charter destinations.

Page 70: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 69

Tour operator market share:

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers55 5.687m 1.5m Controlled distribution56

2009 85%

2008 79%

2009 82.7%

2008 79.4%

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

•Further expand internet sales. • Increase the proportion of customers who book our exclusive, concept hotels. • Continue to build on the success of our world class, in-flight sales. • Consolidate our position in the major Nordic outbound destinations of Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Turkey and Thailand.

Key Brands

Market share:

55 56

http://www.thomascookgroup.com/downloads/pdf/Investor_Day_FINAL_Website.pdf

Page 71: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 70

Market dynamics

• Thomas Cook: The outlook is more positive

in the independent segment and, while there

is still over capacity in the mainstream travel

market, consolidation is possible with the

proposed Sunwing merger with TUI.

• Destinations: USA, Europe, Mexico,

Caribbean

Winter focus Mex/ Carib, summer focus Europe

• Overcapacity in mainstream and no entry barriers

• Highly fragmented retail distribution

• Independent larger more stable market

• Three major players in the overall leisure market Thomas Cook, Transat, Sunwing/

TUI

• Transat and Sunwing/TUI mainstream focused

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers57

0.54m (Including Mainstream and Specialists and Activity sectors)

1.1m

Controlled distribution58

2009

2008

2009 14.1%

2008 15.7%

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

• Pursue flight and accommodation cost savings and strengthen hotel exclusivities. • Grow independent travel through dynamic packaging technology and improved product line. • Strengthen controlled distribution, especially online. • Grow newly launched Financial Services division and expand product range.

57 58

Page 72: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 71

Key Brands

Canada Leisure Market:

With more than 1.1 million (compare with 0,54 m passengers of TUI ) passengers and

hold up to 17% of Canadian Independent wholesale and Mainstream Market share (TUI :

3%), Thomas Cook is a leading player in North America leisure travel market.

Market dynamic

Market conditions have not changed

significantly in the German airlines market.

Highly competitive market.

German tour operator market less

integrated than UK

Stimulation of demand for travel products.

Page 73: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 72

Demand for flexibility & price transparency but growth is levelling out following consolidation.

Market position before the merges:

Page 74: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 73

Market position after the merges:

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers59

8.775 million (Including Mainstream and Specialists and Activity sectors)

5.9m

Number of aircraft

48 34

Retail Estate

Own shop: 428 Franchise: 974

Ownshop: 166 Franchise: 395

Product Focus

Strong focus on mainstream Highest brand equity in the

Market

Strong focus on mainstream market

Well positioned with Neckermann brand in lower/ budget segment.

Controlled distribution60

2009 46%

2008 40%

2008

2009

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management. Expanding the market share in the German-speaking volume market for cruises.

• Focus on cost-saving, especially fuel related efficiencies. • Drive synergies and other benefits through greater co-ordination of activities with other Thomas Cook Group airlines. • Enhance benefits from cooperation with other external airlines.

Key Brands

59 60

Page 75: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 74

Market Share:

In Germany, TUI performs better than Thomas Cook based on the fact that TUI not only

focuses on airline, but also is the market leader in leisure travel market with 8.775

million customers (2009) 61 and achieves revenue of £ 4,144 (2009) which has an

increase 3% over the prior year.

In 2007, TUI fly faced problem because of the heavy assets. Number of 48 air craft was

too big As a consequence TUIfly was sub scale to operate a mixed model effectively and

too big to optimise tour operator margin.

TUIfly also improved its result by cutting capacity in its loss-making scheduled flying

routes. Capacity was cut by 16% in summer 2009, which led to a two percentage point

improvement in load factors for its summer 2009 programme and resulted in a £10m

improvement in margins over the prior year. During the year, TUI also announced that

they entered into a strategic venture with Air Berlin, which will further de-risk the

TUIfly business through an exit of the scheduled flying operation and will secure

optimal capacity for the German tour operator.62

Operating in the same markets, having many similarities in marketing strategy, TUI and

Thomas Cook are the direct competitors of each other. From our group prospective, we

see that TUI has higher market positions in the core market (UK & Ireland, Continental

Europe and Airlines Germany, Northern Europe, North America). Capturing the

advantages from the merges with Fist Choice, TUI travel plc achieve the biggest share

holder in UK market. Across the core markets in Europe, TUI is successful at

maintaining the market leading player.

61 62

29%

17%

16%6%

40%

Germany Core Market Share

TUI

Thomas Cook

Rewe

Alltour

Others

Page 76: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 75

Page 77: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 76

4.5. Product and Service:

Both focus on leisure travel63 Thomas Cook and TUI travel plc have many commons in

products and services. However, it is not mean that the ways they segment their

product and service are the same.

4.5.1. TUI travel plc

TUI has four main business sectors: Mainstream Sector64, Specialist and Emerging

Markers Sector, Activity Sector and Accommodation & Destinations Sector.

63 See Appendix 1 64 See Appendix 1

Page 78: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 77

Mainstream Sector

Mainstream is the largest Sector in terms of size (65%), financial performance and

employee numbers. It comprises leading tour operators and ‘power’ brands and

operates a fleet of 146 aircraft and circa 3,500 retail shops. It has three divisions;

Northern Region, Central Europe and Western Europe.

Mainstream sector includes various package holidays65:

It operates within two key segments of the leisure travel market: Mainstream holidays - which include the sale of differentiated and exclusively

available products, long haul travel as well as more traditional package holidays: Sun holiday

Winter holiday

Family holiday

Adult holiday

All inclusive holiday

Luxury holiday

Component - which includes the sale of flights, accommodation, car hire, transfers and excursions either as separate components or together as part of customer assembled holidays

Specialist & Emerging Markets Sector

65 Appendix 1

Page 79: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 78

The Specialist & Emerging Markets Sector is an international portfolio of travel

businesses focusing on specific destinations, premium travel experiences or particular

customer demographic segments often with differentiated and exclusive product.

The sector consists of 40 businesses operating from North America, Europe and, most

recently, emerging markets such as Russia and Ukraine. Specialist travel experiences

include around-the-world private jet expeditions, student educational tours and tailor-

made trips to the Far East, Africa or Australia. Top selling brands include Mostravel,

Turchese and Hayes & Jarvis.

Page 80: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 79

Activity sector

This Sector has over 40 activity travel businesses that operate under five divisions -

Marine, Adventure, Ski, Student and Sport. Each of these divisions has market-leading

positions.

The Adventure businesses take more customers to iconic adventure destinations than

any other operator. The Sport businesses are leaders in supporter-led cricket and rugby

tours in Australia and the UK, while the Student businesses encompass everything from

the traditional school trip to France, to trek holidays for groups of young adults in the

Himalayas. This Sector also includes the leading yacht brands in Europe and the US and

the world’s largest ski operator. Top selling brands include Crystal Ski, Moorings and Le

Boat.

Accommodation & Destinations Sector

The Accommodation & Destinations Sector sells and provides a range of services in destination to tour operators, travel agents, corporate clients, and direct to the consumer worldwide.

Page 81: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 80

Services include hotel accommodation, transfers, excursions, round trips, organising meetings, incentives, conferences and events (MICE), cruise handling as well as integrated website solutions for our customers. A&D is structured along key business lines - Business to Business (B2B) and Business to Consumer (B2C). Top selling brands are TUI (used by a number of incoming agencies including TUI España, TUI Hellas),

Hotelbeds.com and LateRooms.com.

4.5.2. Thomas Cook

Thomas Cook operates business in four sectors: Mainstream, Independent66, Travel

related to Financial Services67 sector, and Emerging Markets.

66 See Appendix 3 67 See Appendix 3

Page 82: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 81

Mainstream

In mainstream sector, Thomas Cook provides their

customers a wide range of choices for package holidays:

Beach Holiday

Clubbing Holiday

Faraway Holiday

Snow Holiday

All inclusive holidays.

Independent travel

With Independent travel products, travellers have changes to

build their travel plans themselves from multiple

components which Thomas Cook offers.

Independent travel products include:

Tailor- make :

Flights

Flights + Hotel

Hotels

Cruises

City Break

Extra services (car hire, cheap calls abroad, smart

box, booking lounges and parking)

4.5.3. Financial Services related travel of TUI travel plc and Thomas Cook:

Both Thomas Cook and TUI have many offer their customers many convenient financial

Services related travel.

Page 83: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 82

TUI Travel plc Thomas Cook Travel Insurance

Overview Thomas cook and TUI both teamed up with Mondial Assistance to offer clients flexible travel insurance options.

Products - Individual and Family Travel Insurance Winter Sport Cover (Optional) Excess Waiver(Optional) - L'TUR travel insurance package Travel Cancellation insurance Travel Interruption insurance Travel health insurance RundumSorglos Service Baggage Insurance Curtailment Protection

- Family Travel Insurance - Single Parent Family - Couple - Individual - Special packages: ELVIA years 365-Full Protection Package ELVIA year-cancellation-Full Protection Plus ELVIA years - cancellation-Full protection ELVIA annual travel medical protection ELVIA Full Protection Package ELVIA cancellation-Full Protection Plus ELVIA cancellation-Full protection

Page 84: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 83

Travel Card - TUI focus on debit card product such as TUI card in Germany(Visa) and TUI UK's Travel Money Cards - The cards are known as Thomson and First Choice Travel Money Cards and each have their own branding, available in Euro or US Dollar currencies. - The Travel Money Card programme is managed by Prepay Solutions and issued by MasterCard, ensuring global acceptance. - Benifits: Much easier to manage

available balance Linked to travel

insurance services Bonus for travellers

Apply through phone and mail

Thomas Cook offers their customers Credit card services such as Thomas Cook Credit Card in UK (visa) and in Germany Neckermann Reisen MasterCard. - Available in many currencies. - Online card application - Benifits: Earn Travel Pounds

everywhere you shop and save money at Thomas Cook and Going Places.

0% interest for the first 3 months from account opening on all card purchases.

0% commission on holiday money with no cash handling fee at Thomas Cook and Going Places.

0% interest on balance transfers for 9 months made within 60 days of account opening (2.99% fee applies).

Special offers for card holders.

Foreigner currencies services and Travel Cheque

Buy currency and travellers' cheques online or in store

Buy currency and travellers' cheques online or in store Transfer money online or in store. Currency Card.

Other Products Travel voucher Moblie banking

In the matter of financial services related to travel, Thomas Cook and TUI have many

similarities in services. However, Thomas Cook shows more concern about that area

Page 85: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 84

than TUI. Thomas Cook offers their clients more choices for financial services financial

with the unique products such as Currency Card, Travel voucher, Mobile baking.

Different with Thomas Cook, TUI concentrates on develop their debit card product,

which is considered as new using trend. "More and more consumers are choosing to put

their holiday money onto a prepaid card over more traditional options such as

travellers cheques or foreign bank notes. Prepaid travel money cards make budgeting

easier - travelers can only spend up to the value of funds that they load onto your Travel

Money Card - and unlike a credit card, travelers don't need to pass a credit check to get

one, nor is it linked to their bank account. Prepaid cards make it much easier to manage

their available balance whilst away, and of course, the cost of use of the Travel Money

Card when compared to most credit/debit cards is significantly lower."68

4.6. The Boston Consulting Group box (BCG matrix)69

The BCG matrix method is based on the product life cycle theory that can be used to

determine what priorities should be given in the product portfolio of a business unit. To

ensure long-term value creation, a company should have a portfolio of products that

contains both high-growth products in need of cash inputs and low-growth products

that generate a lot of cash. It has 2 dimensions: market share and market growth. The

basic idea behind it is that the bigger the market share a product has or the faster the

product's market grows the

better it is for the company.

Placing products in the BCG

matrix results in 4

categories in a portfolio of

a company:

1. Stars (=high growth,

high market share)

- Use large amounts of cash

and are leaders in the

business so they should

also generate large

amounts of cash.

- Frequently roughly in

balance on net cash flow. However, if needed any attempt should be made to hold share,

because the rewards will be a cash cow if market share is kept.

2. Cash Cows (=low growth, high market share)

68 http://www.scluk.com/scl-powers-tuis-new-travel-money-cards 69 valuebasedmanagement. Retrieved 2010, from http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/

Page 86: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 85

- Profits and cash generation should be high, and because of the low growth,

investments needed should be low. Keep profits high.

- Foundation of a company

3. Dogs (=low growth, low market share)

- Avoid and minimize the number of dogs in a company.

- Beware of expensive ‘turn around plans’.

- Deliver cash, otherwise liquidate

4. Question Marks (= high growth, low market share)

- Have the worst cash characteristics of all, because high demands and low returns due

to low market share

- If nothing is done to change the market share, question marks will simply absorb

great amounts of cash and later, as the growth stops, a dog.

- Either invests heavily or sells off or invests nothing and generates whatever cash it

can. Increase market share or deliver cash.

Based on the products of TUI and Thomas Cook mentioned above, we can fill them in 4

categories of BCG matrix.

TUI Travel plc Thomas Cook Star Activity Sector

Specialist & Emerging Extra services (renting car)

Component holiday, Extra (car hire), Activity Sector.

Cash Cows Package holiday

Independent holiday (city breaks),

Financial services (foreign currencies services and Money card, Travel insurances)

Accommodation and Destination (organising meetings, incentives, conferences and events (MICE))

Accommodation Package holidays Specialist Financial services related

to travel

Question Marks

Hotels, resorts Airlines.

Hotels Airlines

Dogs Cruisers Cruisers

4.7. Supply chain:

Page 87: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 86

TUI and Thomas Cook have the same basic supply chain. They both use the product

source such as Hotels, Transportation Services, and Ancillaries from suppliers or from

their own company, and then they delivery products and services for customers. Retails

and agents play the role as the bridges between the travel company and the customers,

will provide the company the market and client’s information and demands.

Though TUI and Thomas Cook share the same basic supply chain, there are still some

differences:

Thomas Cook Group_nov strategy presentation - web version - final.pdf

Page 88: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 87

TUI Travel PLC

TUI is address as direct supplier in travel industry. As we mentioned earlier in chapter 4

(Management and Organisation), TUI travel plc is a part of TUI AG, which also includes

TUI hotel and Resorts and TUI Cruise. This fact gives TUI the advantages to offer their

customers hotels and services with high levels of quality and standards.

Beside have their own airlines, TUI also have a stronger cooperation with the biggest

European airlines, for example Garman companies, KLM and Turkish Airline.

The payment of products and services are in Euro.

With the offices are mainly located in Germany, so their main target markets are Europe,

especially Germany.

Thomas Cook

Thomas Cook is more like Travel intermediaries, so they has wider range of hotel offers

for their customers from luxury to cheaper price hotels.

Like TUI, beside have their own airlines, Thomas Cook also cooperates with some big

airlines such as British Airway, KLM.

The payments are in Pound.

Thomas Cook has a better reputation in UK. They targets mainly on customers are UK.

http://www.thomascookgroup.com/downloads/pdf/Investor_Day_FINAL_Website.pdf

Page 89: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 88

4.8. Price

As a Travel intermediary, Thomas Cook offers the cheaper prices for the same services

than TUI. Cooperating with other hotels and airline companies, Thomas Cook forces on

low cost travel market with flexible choice for customers. In contract, TUI as a direct

supplier, targets on high level services standards, which will be definitely more

expensive.

In order to

compare the

services prices

between Thomas

Cook and TUI,

our group have

carried out a

small research.

We went to

website of TUI

and Thomas Cook,

book a same

holiday (2

persons) for the

same time:

Destination:

Turkey

Type: All

Inclusive

Hotel: Titanic Beach Rst (4 stars)

As we can see, with a same package holiday, Thomas Cook´s price is £ 1904.78, about

£140 cheaper than the price that TUI (£2046 offers). This fact also reflects their aims to

reduce the service costs, especially accommodation cost in Thomas Cook pricing

http://www.thomascookgroup.com/downloads/pdf/Investor_Day_FINAL_Website.pdf

Page 90: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 89

strategy.

TUI has a higher service´s price, but also they offer more value for customers such as

more baggage allowance (20kg per person) than Thomas Cook (15 kg per person).

4.9. Promotion

Thomas Cook and TUI travel are both such the big travel companies, who own hundreds

of brand names. Brands are more than names and symbols; they represent consumer´s

perceptions and feelings about the products, services and its performance. This

requires the specific promotion strategies for each of their brand name. In common,

their promotion methods are quite similar with the basic ways:

• Travel Brochures

• Agencies including through posters, flyers

• Advertisements including in newspapers, magazines, trade publications for the travel

industry

• Direct mailings to current customers

• E-mails

• Banners and links on the Internet

• Flyers

• Radio and Television commercials

• Joint Promotions and Sponsorship

• Scholarships

The TUI.com Reisemagazin (TUI Travel magazine) Magazine has been implementing the TUI.com Reisemagazin since November 2008. The goal is the production of a regular, multimedia magazine that speaks to the reader's emotions using all of their senses. This is something that is usually not possible for conventional travel

Thomas Cook Travel Magazine Thomas Cook Travel Magazine has a quarterly readership of over two million. The magazine is distributed on all Thomas Cook Group flights including Airtours, Club 18-30, Direct Holidays and Signature. The editorial content is topical, travel-related and aimed at holiday goers. It incorporates destination specific content alongside

Page 91: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 90

catalogues. The monthly, online page turning travel magazine surprises the reader with travel videos, large multimedia picture galleries, inciting sounds and spectacular flash effects. The reader goes on digital trips, discovers new places and holiday trends and can access travel offers with the click of a mouse and book his holiday directly online.

lifestyle features. The magazine also features the duty free products and menu available onboard. The readers are affluent holidaymakers, with core ages between 25 and 54, and are evenly split between male and female.

Thomas Cook

Thomas Cook promotion focus on: - Aviation and climate change

- Supporting destination communities

- Protecting children

- Partnering with suppliers

- Quality

- Animal welfare

Aviation and climate change:

They are hunting for travel industry climate changing; this is to help decreasing CO2

flying. The travel industry also contributes to climate change. While aviation currently

accounts for less than 3% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions (or CO2, the principal

gas responsible for climate change), travel is a rapidly-growing industry and

improvements in fuel efficiency will be insufficient to offset this rise. Some customers

have started to avoid flying so as to reduce their carbon footprint. At the same time,

governments are regulating to reduce emissions through taxes and carbon trading

schemes, thus increasing carbon-related costs for business and consumers. And

increased volatility in fuel prices represents a threat to our airlines. This is clearly a

pressing issue requiring sustained and substantial action from the travel industry, and

one it can play a significant part in tackling.

Supporting destination communities:

Sustainable tourism is about holidaying with respect for local communities: preserving

natural resources, buying local and paying fair, honouring local cultures, protecting

wildlife and preserving destinations for the future enjoyment of others. Thomas Cook

UK & Ireland has been particularly active in this area and is spearheading this work

through their partnership with the Travel Foundation, such as: Sponsoring education in

Turkey, Working with hotels, The Travel Foundation

Protecting children:

The sexual exploitation of children in tourism includes the production of child

pornography and the buying and selling of children for prostitution. Many tourist

Page 92: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 91

destinations do not have the infrastructure to protect these children or offer them a way

out. And when the law is enforced in one destination, the sex offenders move to the next.

It is therefore vital that the tourism industry gets involved and works to drive out the

exploiters who use hotels, bars and other tourist facilities to do their trade.

Partnering with suppliers:

Travelife supports hoteliers to implement sustainability measures and to help

customers reduce their impacts. By training our employees as Travelife auditors, we can

encourage the hotels to win Travelife awards. And by including the award logos in our

brochures, we enable customers to make informed decisions and drive business to the

more sustainable hotels. This creates an incentive for more hotels to adopt sustainable

business practices.

Quality:

A key part of quality management is being open to complaints and seeing how valuable

they are to the company. A complaint is someone telling us how we can make our

customers happier, and that is indispensable business intelligence. What is more, by

responding to a complaint promptly, we can transform a customer’s dissatisfaction into

a view of Thomas Cook Group as a company that cares.

Animal welfare:

Examples of how these freedoms can be denied to animals as a result of tourist activity

include:

inappropriate use of animals, including being made to perform in ways not

natural to them or being used as photographic props

when whale watching, tourist boats can get between a mother and her young,

resulting in a separation that is disastrous for the baby

Large numbers of tourists getting too close can disrupt hunting and feeding

patterns for wild animals, and some can become very ill if exposed to human

conditions like colds or diarrhoea.

Page 93: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 92

TUI Travel plc

As a part of TUI AG, TUI travel plc develop promotion strategy based on social

responsibility:

Futouris; promoting education, protecting the environment and nature

Sport sponsoring

TUI Foundation; supporting in education and training for children and young

people

TUI Sponsorship

ECPAT

Futouris:

Futouris is a non-profit association operating under the aegis of DRV, the German Travel

Association. It supports projects to improve living conditions, promote education,

protect the environment and natural resources and preserve biodiversity in our

destinations.

Sport sponsoring:

Sport, whether on grass, ice or track, provides us with a bit of a break in our everyday

lives. TUI, Germany’s leading tourism group, has found its mission here to put a smile on

people’s faces. For several years now, the Hannover travel group has not only been a

partner of many professional teams but has also been supporting several sporting

events in Germany and abroad. Such as: Hannover 96, Hannover Scorpions, the

international marathon on the Spanish island of Majorca, Marathon Hanover, Eagles

Charity Golf Club.

TUI Foundation:

The TUI Foundation supports projects with financial or material resources allocated

within the framework of an application-based system. However, it also undertakes its

own projects. As a service-oriented and international group, at the same time we try to

promote initiatives established with a basic principle compatible with our own

everyday operations.

TUI Sponsorship:

Since 1995, employees at TUI in Hanover have been annually supporting a charitable

welfare project.

On an annual basis one charitable project is chosen and supported. At the end of the

year, management then presents the amount collected as a cheque to the institutions.

To date a sum of around 410,000 euro has been collected for direct help on the ground.

The projects receiving support range from life-help groups and all-day schools and

lunch clubs for disadvantaged children, through to help for children with cancer and

their families.

Page 94: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 93

ECPAT:

Throughout the Group the TUI corporate companies are united in fighting against child

prostitution. In the majority of cases this is carried out in cooperation with the

international child protection organization ECPAT.

Follow the new promotion trends; both Thomas Cook and TUI are changing their

strategy to have the better image about green travel companies. The two companies

concern on activities which are high concerned topics such as climate changing,

protecting children and animal welfare. Delivery friendly environment messages, TUI

and Thomas Cook aim to sustainable marketing strive for the long run survival of

customers and the business that provide for them.

Highlight promotion:

TUI has a bigger budget for marketing.

The Budget allows them to develop

many media campaigns, which build an

impressive image in the customer´s

mind. Beside design company logo as a

smile, to emphasise more on the

message of customer oriented

company, TUI have their own songs,

such as the song “Let´s make people

smile” or “Touch the sky”.

Focus on cheap price holidays, flights

and hotels, Thomas Cook have other special way to promote their services with a

smaller marketing budget. For instance, they offer special promotion flight program for

journalists, especially with British airways.

Page 95: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 94

4.10. Distribution

4.10.1. Booking Routes

TUI and Thomas Cook have the same basic distribution channel with same basic

Booking Routes

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Booking Routes:

Page 96: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 95

4.10.2. Distribution channels

TUI Thomas Cook

Travel

Agencies

Own retail shops

Franchises

Third- party distributions

Own Travel agencies

Franchises

Third- party distributions

Ecommerce All most every brands have the brand website for customers to book services online

http://www.firstchoice.co.uk/

http://www.thomson.co.uk/

http://www.arke.nl/wintersport.aspx

http://www.tuifly.com/de/

Thomascook.com: Each country

has one website for online

booking.

http://www.thomascook.com/

http://www.thomascook.de/

http://www.thomascook.pl/

http://www.thomascook.fr/

http://www.neckermann-

reisen.de/

Telephone

Selling

Call Centers Call Centers

4.10.3. Cross Channel Marketing

TUI and Thomas Cook both use same distribution channels: E-Mail, Direct Booking, (Re-)

Auctions, and Service Hotline. As we can see on the booking chart, Thomas Cook and

TUI use “cross channel marketing”, which means use of one marketing channel (such as

direct mail or internet) to support or promote another channel (such as retailing)70 .

Basically, customers are given some sensations about travel services, and invite the

customer’s curiosity by offer the links go to the website, or the numbers to call for the

further information. That also means that customers often use various channels for

information procurement and product/ services purchasing.

The various channels are dedicated to different customer segments in order to reach the full

market potential. In some cases an individual channel can compensate drawbacks of other

channels. For example, the lack of face-to-face communication experienced in online tourism

channels can be compensated by calling the customers attention on available service hotlines

for supporting him on specific questions. Most consumers notice the variety of information

and distribution channels while switching between them. Based on this number of perceived

channels the customer measures the size of the company which is an important issue. For the

70 http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/cross-channel-marketing.html https://ie-wiki.uni-muenster.de/index.php?title=Multi-Channel_Marketi

Page 97: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 96

market leaders like Thomas Cook and TUI, in order to maximize their market power, that

again increases the trust level of a customer towards the company.

With approximately 3,500 retail shops in continental

Europe, the UK & Ireland and approximately 30

million customers per year, TUI have wider

distribution channel than Thomas Cook (3400

owned and franchised travel stores). Apply Cross

Channel Marketing, the website of TUI additionally

offers a complete online version of their print catalogue

which can be browsed for offers by thumbing through

the pages .The online catalogues like the printed

versions are assorted by holiday destinations, seasons

and the separate operators of the TUI group. The „TUI

Reisemagazin‟ provides interested parties with multimedia information on selected holiday

offers in form of an attractive online magazine. It contains photo galleries and videos and

links to the relevant partners. The website furthermore integrates a regular newsletter

subscription in order to inform potential customers about news and special offers. The front

page directly links subsidiary companies of the TUI group like TUI Cruises and TUIfly.

Thomas Cook flyers and e- magazine also

provide customers links to thomascook.com

or the telephone numbers to contact their call

center.

4.11. Ecommerce

Nowadays, Internet has an increasing impact to human life. Ecommerce become a new

business trend. Both Thomas Cook and TUI Thomas Cook are now moving into the online

channel in a serious way.

Page 98: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 97

TUI is successful at building a unified customer database that helps it compete effectively

with established rivals like Thomson and First Choice.

Thomas Cook was faster in UK online market when in1997, www.thomascook.com was

launched, making it the first U.K. retail travel agency to offer customers a way to request

flight availability and buy vacations, travelers checks, foreign currency and travel guides over

the Internet. Since then, thomascook.com has become a business in its own right.

Both Thomas Cook and TUI booking websites is user friendly. It is really easy for customers

to search for information about the holidays, book and do payment online. Both companies‟

websites are designed to allow clients approach easily with wide range of travel options.

Thomas Cook has series of booking website “thomascook.com”, while TUI has different

websites for different brand names. So it will be easy for customers when they want to

book a product or service of Thomas Cook in different countries, they can just go to

Thomas Cook website with different domains, such as thomascook.de for Germany,

thomascook.fr for France.

Page 99: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 98

We can see both TUI and Thomas develop ecommerce activities by the same strategies:

• Use strong brands to attract customers online and offline

• Build on our already leading travel site

• Use travel expertise

• Develop a multi-channel customer proposition

• Use customer insights to optimise offering and pricing

• Increase sales of ancillaries

• Invest significantly in systems

Through being the first U.K.online retail travel agency, Thomas Cook still have to stand

behind TUI website about number of weekly visits in UK.

4.12. Conlusion for Marketing chapter

In the matter of marketing, in our group´s opinion, TUI is performing better than

Thomas Cook. TUI operates in more market sources, and they are the leading player in

almost of the core markets. The advantages from the bigger scale and heavier assets

allow TUI has more budgets for marketing, which is really helpful in building a stronger

image with customers. However, maintaining too many brand at same time is higher the

expenses for marketing of TUI. This will definitely lower the company’s net profit, and

keep the services in the high prices.

As direct competitor with TUI in every core market, Thomas Cook also has their own

marketing strategies to compete. Marketing with the smaller budget, Thomas Cook

develop the unique promotion offers, focus on special groups of customers. Offering the

cheaper prices and effective promotion strategies, Thomas Cook is strengthening their

market position.

Chapter 5 Management and Organization:

Thomas Cook Group_nov strategy presentation - web version - final.pdf

Page 100: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 99

5.1. Company Profile

5.1.1. Company Background

TUI Travel PLC

TUI Travel PLC is a part of TUI AG, which is Europe‟s leading travel group comprising a

controlling stake in TUI Travel (tour operating, online and high street distribution, airlines,

incoming agencies), TUI Hotels & Resorts and the cruise ship business. In addition, the

group holds a 43,33 per cent stake in the container shipping line Hapag-Lloyd. In the short

financial year 2009 the turnover of TUI AG was €13.1 billion with total earnings of €656.6

million (underlying EBITA).1 On 30 September 2009 the headcount totalled 65,000

employees.

Page 101: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 100

TUI Travel PLC is a FTSE 100 international leisure travel group listed on the London Stock

Exchange. It was formed on 3 September 2007 by the merger of First Choice Holidays PLC

and the Tourism Division of TUI AG, which owns 43% of the company, operating in over

180 countries and serving 30 million customers in 27 key source markets. It is headquartered

in Crawley, West Sussex, England. It is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index, with around

157aircraft and circa 3500 retail outlets in Europe and employs 60,033 people worldwide.

The company mainly serves the leisure travel customer and is organized and managed

through four business sectors: Mainstream, Specialist and Emerging Markets, Activity and

Online Destination Services.

Thomas Cook Group PLC

Thomas Cook is the world‟s best-known name in travel, thanks to the inspiration and

dedication of a single man. Thomas Cook began his international travel company in 1841,

with a successful one-day rail excursion at a shilling a head from Leicester to Loughborough

on 5 July. From these humble beginnings Thomas Cook launched a whole new kind of

company devoted to helping Britons see the world.

In February 12, 2007,The leading German retailer KarstadtQuelle AG is to merge its Tourism

subsidiary, Thomas Cook, with the leading British travel company MyTravel. The newly

established company will be named Thomas Cook Group plc and will be traded on the

London Stock Exchange. KarstadtQuelle will hold 52 percent in the new company and will

consolidate it fully.

Thomas Cook Group plc is one of the world's leading leisure travel groups with sales of

around £9 billion (€12 billion), 22.3 million customers, 31,000 employees, a fleet of 93

aircraft and a network of over 3,400 owned and franchised travel stores and interests in 86

Page 102: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 101

hotels and resort properties.

It operates under five segments: UK & Ireland; Continental Europe (Germany, Austria,

Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Poland, Hungary, Slovenia and Slovakia); Northern

Europe (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland), North America (Canada and USA); and

German airlines operating under the Condor brand.

5.1.2. Company Scale

TUI Travel plc Thomas Cook

Employees 60,033 31,000

Operating countries 180 93*

Aircrafts 157 95

Customers 30.000.000 22.300,000

* 73 of the countries Thomas Cook operates are under the daughter company Condor and in

the rest of the 20 companies Thomas Cook plc operates by itself.

TUI has a bigger scale and operates business in wider market. They have heavier assets

with180 air craft (Thomas Cook 95) also have larger distribution channel.

5.1.3. Mission Statement

“A Mission Statement of the organization’s purpose – what it wants to accomplish in the

larger environment”71. A mission statement, in management prospective, guides the

strategies and structure of company

marketing orientation. In matter of

Mission Statement, TUI Travel PLC and

Thomas Cook Group PLC have different

perspectives.

Under the global vision “WE GO FURTHER

TO MAKE DREAMS COME”, Thomas Cook

states itself with four different missions

based on five main divisions: UK & Ireland,

Continental Europe and Airlines Germany,

Northern Europe, North America. The

differences in the Thomas Cook ´s Mission

Statements in different divisions are related on its flexible business models and

concentrated marketing strategy for every different geography market.

Conversely, TUI travel plc does not publish any mission statement. Being confident

about the reputations as one of the market leaders in Tourism industry, the Leader of

TUI believed it is not essential to have a sentence to describe company's function,

markets and competitive advantages; and state its business goals and philosophies,

which have already become the famous concepts. “TUI Travel PLC does not have a

Mission Statement. We have a stated strategy which is to create superior shareholder

71

•Exceptional Service From Exceptional People

UK & Ireland

• To perfect the personal leisure experience.

Continental Europe and Airlines Germany

• Further we go to make dreams come true

Northern Europe

•To be the best travel company in the world to travel with, work for, and invest in

North America

Page 103: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 102

value by being the world’s leading leisure travel group providing customers with a wide

choice of differentiated and flexible travel experiences to meet their changing needs To

enable us to achieve this goal we have identified four key strategic imperatives which are

linked to our KPIs.”72

5.3.4. Vision and Values:

TUI Travel plc

Their common vision and values unite their across the Group and they call this their TUI

Spirit. Their vision is Making Travel Experiences Special and their four values are:

• Responsible leadership

• Customer obsessed

• Value driven

• Playing to win

Winning behaviours have been developed to help embed these values in every day working

life in a number of ways. These behaviours allow them to truly engage in their work and

optimize their performance – as individuals and as a business.

Thomas Cook

These values are the focus for ensuring that every Thomas Cook employee embraces what

they stand for and are PROUD to work with us delivering customer service that‟s second to

none.

72 FAQS. TUI Travel plc. Retrieved from http://www.tuitravelplc.com/tui/pages/investors/shareholderinfo/faqs

TUI Travel and Thomas cook plc have the vision, which is quite similar. As customer oriented

companies, customers are very important for both companies, because the more customers they

have the better for the company. TUI and Thomas Cook wants to make sure that their customers

come back every time when they think of travelling. As already mentioned in the table above,

the vision of Thomas Cook is that „they go further to make dreams come true‟. Thomas Cook

tries to do something extra for the customers. In long-term both companies want to grow and be

the biggest travel agency in the world.

Page 104: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 103

5.3.5. Sustainability Development and Social Responsibility

Sustainability development becomes more important for companies specially for transport

companies. We can say that TUI Travel and Thomas Cook are also transport companies

because the offer their customers a service with aircraft. Nowadays more people want to

travel environmentally conscious, because the environment is a big issue for us and the next

generation. Companies like TUI and Thomas Cook have to take in account the environment.

TUI Travel and Thomas cook plc have the vision, which is quite similar. As customer

oriented companies, customers are very important for both companies, because the more

customers they have the better for the company. TUI and Thomas Cook wants to make sure

that their customers come back every time when they think of travelling. As already

mentioned in the table above, the vision of Thomas Cook is that „they go further to make

dreams come true‟. Thomas Cook tries to do something extra for the customers. In long-term

both companies want to grow and be the biggest travel agency in the world.

Page 105: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 104

TUI Travel

Throughout the year, sustainable development has continued to be an important part of the

business agenda for TUI Travel. They aspire to lead in sustainable development within the

leisure travel industry. In the long term, they believe this goal will help build shareholder

value for TUI Travel and contribute to operating a strong business now and in the future.

• TUI Travel is listed on the FTSE4Good Index in recognition of its transparency and for

meeting strict social, environmental and governance standards.

• It is the highest placed travel company, at 16, in the 2008 Good Companies Guide – The

Observer‟s annual ethical ranking of FTSE350 companies.

• TUI Travel‟s first full Sustainable Development Report was published in July 2009, with

independent verification of their targets by Bureau Veritas.

• For the second consecutive year, they have been included in the Carbon Disclosure

Leadership Index, which highlights the top 10% of FTSE350 companies that have displayed

the most professional approach to climate change disclosure.

Sustainable development strategy of TUI Travel Plc

During 2008/2009, they developed a Group sustainable development policy in conjunction

with key colleagues, articulating their vision and approach to sustainable development. The

Group Code of Conduct covers a wide range of sustainability issues, including human rights,

business ethics and transparency and commits TUI Travel to upholding the principles of the

UN Global Compact.

TUI Travel‟s sustainable development strategy is based on consideration of the key issues

affecting the Company, now and in the future. It has been developed in consultation with

internal and external stakeholders. They encourage all TUI Travel businesses to develop their

own sustainable development strategy, aligning with Group priorities. At the end of

2008/2009, 73% of TUI Travel businesses had their own sustainable development strategy.

Policy and mitigation for Groupwide risks relating to sustainability are facilitated by the

Group Risk Management and Sustainable Development Departments, with responsibility for

managing such risks also shared by the businesses themselves.

Thomas Cook plc

The last year has proved a testing time for all areas of business, not least the travel industry.

The global economic downturn brought with it a decline in international tourism in 2009,

intensified by many other factors including consumer confidence, terrorism incidents,

fluctuating exchange rates and the outbreak of swine flu.

At Thomas Cook Group, their response to challenging market conditions is to work harder

and go further to make dreams come true for their customers. They recognize the many

virtues of travel, the positive cultural exchange and the boost to local economies, but they are

also aware of the potential impact on the environment, societies and local cultures. The travel

and tourism industry has a responsibility to operate in a sustainable way and Thomas Cook,

Page 106: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 105

which founded its business with clear social and educational intentions, is proactive in this

area.

They aim to have sustainability at the core of their business and feature it as an integral part

of their strategy, particularly when it comes to the environment. These responsibilities no

longer sit on the periphery; their importance represents a genuine business risk. Society,

customers, investors, governments and communities no longer look for, but demand that both

time and money be invested in the preservation and protection of the incredible people and

places they come into contact with.

Over 160 years ago a former preacher, Thomas Cook, devised the first package holiday.

Since then, the business he founded has helped millions of people to relax, unwind – and

broaden their horizons. Thomas Cook didn‟t just want people to have fun. He believed

affordable travel could change working people‟s lives for the better. His company was

inspired by a strong sense of social justice and moral responsibility: what today they call

corporate social responsibility (CSR).

Today, they‟re still inspired by their founder‟s values. They believe they make a world of

difference – not only to their customers, but to all the people whose lives they touch. Their

mission is to perfect the personal leisure experience. And that includes managing their

activities in a morally and socially responsible manner.

We compare the two companies by these two points; we can say that both of the companies

are trying to work on a very sustainable way. However, TUI Travel is working more on

sustainability and Thomas Cook concerns more about the responsibility for the people in the

area‟s they are cooperating.

Page 107: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 106

5.2. Company Organization

5.2.1. Organizational structures Both operating in travel industry, however, TUI and Thomas Cook are using different form of

departmentalization, which means: “the basic on which job are grouped together73

TUI Travel plc Organizational structures

TUI is using Geographical Departmentalization, which means groups jobs according to

Geographical Region.

Adv

antages and disadvantages of Geographical Departmentalization74

Advantages Disadvantages

More effective and efficient handling

of specific regional issues that arise

Serve needs of unique geography

market better

Duplication of functions

Can feel isolated from other

organization areas

Broad of Directors:

The Company is controlled through its Board of Directors –the Directors at the date of this

report are:

Director’s name Title

1. Horst Baier Non-Executive Director

2. Dr Volker Böttcher Managing Director, Central Europe

3. Paul Bowtell Chief Financial Officer

4. Tony Campbell Non-Executive Director

5. Clare Chapman Non-Executive Director

6. Bill Dalton Non-Executive Director

7. Rainer Feuerhake Non-Executive Director

8. Dr Michael Frenzel Non-Executive Chairman

9. Jeremy Hicks Non-Executive Director

10. Sir Michael Hodgkinson Non-Executive Deputy Chairman and Senior

Independent Director

11. Peter Long Chief Executive

73 Robbins, S. P., & Coutler, M. (2009). Management. (tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. 74 Robbins, S. P., & Coutler, M. (2009). Management. (tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Page 108: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 107

12. Johan Lundgren Managing Director, Northern Region

13. Dr Erhard Schipporeit Non-Executive Director

14. Dr Albert Schunk Non-Executive Director

15. Harold Sher Non-Executive Director

16. Giles Thorley Non-Executive Director

17. William Waggott Commercial Director

TUI Travel plc Organizational structures chart:

Page 109: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 108

Thomas Cook Organizational structures

Thomas Cook has a more flexible organization structure, which is combined by Geographical

Departmentalization and Functional Departmentalization (Groups Jobs according to function).

Advantages and disadvantages of Geographical Departmentalization75

Advantages Disadvantages

More effectives from putting together

people with common skills,

knowledge, and orientations.

Coordination with function areas

In depth specialization.

Poor communication across

functional areas

Limited view of organizationalngoals

Broad of Director

The Board is chaired by Non-Executive Chairman, Michael Beckett. In addition to the

Chairman, the Board currently includes three Executive Directors and five Non-Executive

Directors. Each of the committees of the Board is chaired by an Independent Non-Executive

Director.

The Group Chief Executive Officer chairs the Group Executive Board, which oversees the

strategic development and operational management of the Group's businesses. The Group

Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Executive Officer, Northern Europe & Deputy to the

Group Chief Executive Officer are also members of the Group Executive Board.

75 Robbins, S. P., & Coutler, M. (2009). Management. (tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Page 110: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 109

Thomas Cook Organizational structures chart:

5.3. Human Resources Management

5.3.1. Recruitment

5.3.1.1.TUI Travel plc Apprenticeship programme

There is extremely high demand for the Apprenticeship programme at TUI, with over 40,500

website enquiries and 15,000 applicants each year.

Due to the high volume of applicants, an extensive and rigorous selection process is in place

for the 450-500 positions. This includes an online assessment focusing on literacy and

numeracy skills, an interview and a „taster day‟ in a branch which allows them to experience

the real working environment and understand what the role entails. “We always use a taster

day. So what we do is we bring people into the location and see how they get on with the

tasks which are typical of the day. And what we do find is that lots of people will either

immediately realise it‟s for me or it‟s not for me.” (Andy Smyth, Accredited Programmes

Manager)76

In addition to looking for people with literacy and numeracy skills, TUI also look for people

with strong personal attributes such as motivation and personality. “In order to get onto the

apprenticeship programmes, we‟re actually looking for people who do have strong numeracy

and literacy skills and we‟re looking for people with personality. What we want are people

who are motivated. We want people who are driven to succeed." (Andy Smyth, Accredited

Programmes Manager)77

Content and delivery

76http://www.people1st.co.uk/webfiles/Research/Case%20Studies/Travel%20Training%20Case%20Studies/TUI_Case_Study_Oct_08.pdf 77http://www.people1st.co.uk/webfiles/Research/Case%20Studies/Travel%20Training%20Case%20Studies/TUI_Case_Study_Oct_08.pdf

Page 111: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 110

To successfully complete their apprenticeship, apprentices must complete an NVQ, three

technical certificates (providing the knowledge and understanding which underpins the NVQ)

and two key skills as shown in the table below:

Apprentices receive all the normal training a non-apprentice receives such as a first day

induction in store, health and safety training, daily store briefings and an hour of training

each week where the store is closed. In addition to this, TUI provides the following support to

help apprentices complete their programme:

• A two day „Welcome Event‟

• Five hours of study time per week

• E-learning

• Six formal off-the-job training days per year, with a focus on completing the technical

certificates

There is a strong support network available to ensure the apprentice receives all the help they

require. This includes an Apprenticeship Expert in each region whose role is to coordinate

training and ensure that the apprentices are progressing in line with the programme. There are

a number of Shop Managers in each region who are responsible for the delivery of training to

apprentices.

Each apprentice is also allocated a workplace mentor based in the same shop as them. Most

mentors are ex-apprentices themselves and are there to provide support, inspiration and to

help them progress. Apprentices are assigned an assessor to guide them through the

framework and support them with action planning. They visit on a monthly basis and ensure

that learning is taking place.

An important element of the programme is that the content has been designed to meet the

needs f their own organisation and all materials and workbooks are bespoke to TUI.

Benefits of the apprenticeship programme

Research carried out by People1st has highlighted the main benefits of the apprenticeship as

being:

• Increased recruitment, retention and motivation of staff

Page 112: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 111

• A demonstration of an organisation‟s commitment to training

• Supporting performance and career development

• Providing cost effective training

• A programme that is consistent and structured

• A programme which complements in-house training

• Supporting the development of skills

• Increased loyalty to the business

At TUI the key business benefits of apprenticeships have been higher staff retention rates and

greater sales performance. This is illustrated for example, by ex-apprentices who regularly

featuring in their „top-sellers‟ lists. An example was

also given of an ex-apprentice who achieved £1.3

million in sales in one financial year. The average is

£350k. This individual became a shop manager at

18.TUI has examined how ex-apprentices performance

compares to non-apprentices in relation to sales

revenue generated. The table below shows clearly that

the apprenticeship programme helps improve sales

performance with ex-apprentice Travel Advisors

achieving over 16% more sales than non-apprentices.

In short, TUI is an organisation which has a reputation

for offering a first class apprenticeship programme.

They have aimed to make it the programme of choice

and this is demonstrated in the opportunities and

career development available for apprentices. It is

unsurprising then, that demand for Apprenticeship

places greatly exceeds supply.

For TUI the return on investment of the apprenticeship programme is a clear increase in sales

performance and greater staff retention for those who have been through the programme,

compared to those who haven‟t. Looking to the future, TUI intends to build on their

successful apprenticeship programme by increasing places by up to 50% in the coming year.

TUI Horizons78

TUI Horizons is a development programme for middle managers who have been identified as

management talent with the potential to take up senior general management positions across

the Group. TUI Horizons is run as a virtual business school, using a number of external

experts and internal specialists from across the Group covering business topics including

Tourism and the Business Environment, Strategy and Finance. During 2009, the programme

ran three times, with 65 managers participating. In 2010, they plan to extend the scope of TUI

Horizons. In addition to the core modules, they will offer a number of one-day master classes

on specific subjects that will provide ongoing opportunities for learning and networking.

78 ). Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

Page 113: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 112

Recruiting for their long term success79

Their International Graduate Management Scheme is part of their strategy to recruit and

develop the right people to ensure the long term success of their business. Over 18 months,

trainees take on assignments in different parts of the Group lasting three/four months and also

receive additional personal training and support during this time.

At the end of the scheme, their trainees are offered permanent positions where possible.

Twelve trainees from nine countries – Belarus, China, France, Germany, Hungary, India, the

Netherlands, Sweden and the UK – participated in the International Management Trainee

scheme in 2009. This included seven trainees who were recruited into the scheme in 2009 and

five trainees who joined the scheme in 2008. This year, three trainees have joined the Group

in permanent roles, as Sales & Retail Manager in Germany, Staff Incentives Manager in UK

& Ireland Mainstream and Project Manager for Specialist & Emerging Markets in Russia.

Organisation effectiveness80

They support organisation effectiveness through talent management and recruitment

processes. Talent across the Group is reviewed regularly at Board level and they are focused

on retaining and developing individuals to drive the business forward. To meet seasonal

demands, they move their topperforming frontline colleagues between retail, overseas

representation and airline cabin crew roles where possible. This develops a multi-skilled

workforce with year-round experience of delivering service to their customers. they use the

most effective recruitment methods in the countries in which they operate and encourage the

sharing of skills and knowledge to suit both the business and their colleagues. As part of their

recruitment approach, they actively promote career opportunities across the Group to enhance

the mix of professional and general management skills.

Reward programmes81

They operate competitive reward programmes to reinforce and support their overall colleague

engagement strategy. In addition, variable compensation in the form of annual and longer

term incentives helps drive the high performance that their results demonstrate. This year

they introduced an aligned incentive programme for their most senior leaders throughout the

Group. The programme rewards financial performance of the business in which the

individual works. In 2010, the programme will also take into account how that performance

was achieved by mapping the individual leader‟s actions to their winning behaviours. To aid

retention of talent and ensure focus on longer term shareholder value creation, at least one-

quarter of the annual bonus achieved is deferred into TUI Travel PLC shares for three years

or more. The majority of their colleagues participate in local benefit programmes including

retirement benefit schemes and generous holiday discounts. In the UK, colleagues are able to

purchase shares in the Group through their Share Incentive Plan that provides one free share

for every four shares purchased.

79

). Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/ 80 . Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/ 81 . Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

Page 114: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 113

5.3.1.2. Thomas Cook

“There‟s a clear progression path for every employee overseas” (Elinor Carr, Learning and

Development).

As well as receiving regular training throughout the season, staff are offered a range of

development opportunities. One such opportunity is STARS – Senior Training and

Recognition Scheme - which has three levels and provides staff with training opportunities

which are clearly linked to career progression.

Page 115: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 114

The recruitment process onto STARS is

rigorous and the required standard must be

reached. Staff are expected to complete a range

of tasks which have direct links to the company

PROUD values. The tasks can be small (such as

controlling the airport) or large (like organising

a fund raising event in resort). Staff are

expected to achieve a pass grade for each task

and only when they have achieved the pass

grade for all tasks set will they have passed the

STARS in resort stage. A key benefit of

STARS is that it assists with succession

planning, enabling suitable employees to be

identified and trained for the next level. This in

turn can help ensure staff are retained and promoted from within the business.

STARS also provides a clear career progression route for staff wish to develop and move up

the career ladder. “The main benefit of the STARS programme is that it‟s very clear to every

member of staff who starts working with Thomas Cook that there is the opportunity for

career progression and for development.” (Elinor Carr, Learning and Development).

5.3.2. Job Selection

As the international company with hundreds of brand names, TUI and Thomas have different

to recruitment requirements to hire different kind of people working under different brands

name.

5.3.2.1.Finland TUI

Finnmatkat children's and sports / activity leader

Bamsekerho director and Sports, and Super Kids Guide - infectious joy of life!

Itching to spread joy through the busy children and adults with a Finnmatkat Blue Village,

Exotic-Blue Village or Blue Star -In different parts of the world?

Bamsekerho-director provide 3-6 years of age referred to Bamsekerhoissa. Finnmatkat

children's smallest clubs, our customers can play, and experience the adventure of any kind

and get new friends. You are responsible for the quality of the implementation of the agreed

program.

Blue Star hotels in replying to Finnmatkat 7-12 years old children Super Kids -Clubs,

exciting and fun sports activities for the planning and implementation.

Sport & Super Kids-guide and are planning to pull all kinds of shallow water exercise in the

morning and beach volley tournaments and After Beach quizzes. Take care of the Super

Kids-lastenkerhostamme, which offers sports and adventures from 7 to 12 years of age for a

few hours a day.

Page 116: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 115

Enthusiasm and service agreement

Energi September, and a genuine enthusiasm are the most important tools. You are also

service-oriented and know how to treat and help every kind of travel according to the

situation.

A unique team spirit

Finn Voyage is a unique spirit of service, known as the Blue Spirit. As soon as the first part

of your day since you're the team that solves the challenges together and whose members

support each other always. You'll also get a sense of belonging, much experience and often

life-long friends.

Not thrive in

Also holidays in resorts, which are other get paid large sums of money, are the work benefits.

However, you must also be prepared for hard work, stay helpful and stressful conditions of

service as a spiritual and, of course, also spend long periods away from another culture

intimately.

Blue Academy Gran Canaria

If you recognize the description of yourself and you meet the basic requirements presented

below, you can search for Blue Academy Travel School. Successfully passed the course

guarantee you a permanent job, and you will experience the Blue Spirit, in fact.

Basic Requirements

high school diploma or equivalent

Finnish language excellent oral and written communication skills

good knowledge of English

experience

Children's Director

child or youth groups working with the training

Sports Guide

Coaching, or exercise control of experience / education

The benefit is calculated

Swedish or other Nordic language skills or any other language

previous stay abroad

esiintymisvarmuus / habit microphone

Page 117: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 116

5.3.2.2. Finland Thomas Cook

Children’s guide

Children & Youth as a director you must ensure that children feel comfortable and have

something fun to do - variety of activities and games, pulikointia swimming pool as well as

spiritual adventure racing. A bit older kids, organized activities such as crafts, play & chat,

football and water sports. You are responsible for all these activities for the organization and

inspiring in their own way with you are also children and young people excited about and

participate in them. The work is carried Sunwing-hotels.

Requirements

Experience in working with children is needed for this job. We require that you have

experience working with children. Benefit shall be, if you are not trained kindergarten teacher,

recreation supervisor, nurse or teacher. You need to be social, outgoing and interested in

children and young people's work. It is also good if you are interested in the creative or

sporting duties, such as crafts, painting, football and / or water sports. We assume you are

holding high school certificates as well as oral and written fluent in Finnish and Swedish

language skills. You speak also fluent English, Other languages are calculated advantage.

5.3.3.1.Germany TUI

Clerk / in Front Office Sales & Customer Support.

Responsibilities

• Settlement of sales and consultations on the phone for tui.com, 1-2, Fly.com,

robinson.com and discount-travel.com

• Handling of inquiries and reservations by e-mail

• Quotations

• Cross-selling and up

• Process management and accounting control

• Ensuring the quality

• Support for user questions and posting questions to redirect the client

• Careful editing of complaints and maintenance of simple complaints talks

Requirements

• Training as a travel clerk

• Extensive experience in dealing with relevant system applications (especially

Amadeus, IRIS.plus, Toma, Inexso, Midoco)

• Extensive knowledge of MS Office systems

• Geographic knowledge and sound local knowledge

• Sales force, communication skills and counseling skills

• Good knowledge of English

• Experience, knowledge and joy in dealing with Web-based applications

• Consistent quality and Servicedenken

• Enthusiasm and joy in dealing with people

• Willingness to flexible working hours and adopting weekend shifts

Page 118: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 117

Benifits

... A modern workplace, and an interesting and versatile use in a motivated team.

It is a part-time 20-30 hours / week (50% -75%) for full flexibility.

The World of TUI - is made of people. Are you ready to discover this world?

The diversity is the wealth of the World of TUI.

5.3.3.1. Germany (Thomas cook)

Job dicription

• Release of the tourist information on the regulation calculated under examination at

specified dates and the release of the correct automatic Kosteneinbuchung and data available

to the audit and credit creation for Handling-/Transferkosten and tours

• Read and interpret contracts target for regulation as well as archiving and organization

of the contracts

• Monitoring and control of operations such as the assessment of contract interpretation

for the accuracy of the automatic setting regulation

• Regular quality control of the calculated and shared travel orders to regulate the basis

of predetermined control evaluations

• Data provision for parts of the department reporting

• Read and interpret the appropriate department reports and independent control to meet

given objectives

• Clarification of Regulierungsunstimmigkeiten on a contractual basis, data entry and

correction of data regulierungsrelevanten

• Data supply and maintenance of reporting in Excel files or other data tables

• Communication with hotel and shopping destination management to ensure regulatory

• Participation in monthly, quarterly, annual work of the Settlement Area Hotel

• Regular communication with its associated Shared Service Centers in the English

language to clarify inconsistencies in the connected part of regulatory process and carried out

there

Requriements

• completed commercial training, ideally in the travel and tourism sector

• Knowledge of accounting

• Good English language skills

• Reliable knowledge of MS Office applications (Winword, Excel)

• Self-employed and responsible way of working

• Strong ability to complex and process-oriented thinking

• High operating and service readiness, resilience and self-confident and

communicative occurrence

• Willingness to travel

• Read and interpret UML processes

Page 119: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 118

Advantage

Thomas Cook offer an exciting work environment with

international contacts, extensive social benefits and new

challenges every day.

5.3.3.Emloyee engagement

TUI

TUI shared one vision and one set of values across the

Group and have developed winning behaviours to support

them. They involve their colleagues in business matters

that affect them and respond to feedback received through employee surveys, employee

forums and as part of the performance review cycle. The performance review cycle gives

every colleague the opportunity to meet their line manager at least once annually to discuss

their performance and to make plans for development in the coming year.

Thomas Cook

Thomas Cook places a great deal of importance on internal communications to create

universal understanding of the Group‟s agenda. The Group Chief Executive Officer visits the

business segments throughout the year and communicates on a monthly basis to update

Group employees on the Company‟s progress and performance. Regular communications

within the segments keep our people up-to-date on the latest business and market

developments. In addition, their key markets also host annual conferences to review the

previous year‟s performance and set out the priorities for the coming year.

Page 120: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 119

5.3.4. Personal expenses

We want to compare the expenses of the employees to see how much money the companies

spend on their personal expenses.

Thomas Cook

TUI Travel

5.4. Conclusion

Since Both TUI and Thomas Cook are international travel company which have a very

complex organizational structure. TUI Travel and Thomas Cook have training programs with

a wide range of variety, but TUI Travel Trains their employee better. This is because TUI has

a more specialized division, and more detailed Training Programs than Thomas Cook Group

PLC. However, Thomas Cook gains more on employee job satisfaction compare to TUI.

TUI Travel invests more money in their people and the training programs more than Thomas

Cook. This makes TUI performs better in managerial aspect, since TUI invests more in their

Training Programs, which are more detailed and specific compared to TUI.

Page 121: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 120

Chapter 6 Key Performance Indicators

6.1 Financial 6.1.1 KPI Rationale

Our group believe that to measure and to compare two companies performance, financial

analysis is crucial. With making a benchmark on specific data we can use to compare both

companies, and we can see which company is performing better. Financial benchmark only

will not be able to judge the overall performance of a company, but financial performance are

most important when we are judging how well a company manage their resources.

6.1.2 Performance/Target

To measure TUI Travel PLC and Thomas Cook Group PLC, we have three financial KPIs

with 7 PI :

Profit Ratios

o Gross Profit Margin

The gross profit margin simply gives the percentage of sales available

to cover general and administrative expenses and other operating costs.

o Net Profit Margin

This number is an indication of how effective a company is at cost

control. The higher the net profit margin is, the more effective the

company is at converting revenue into actual profit. o Return on Total Assets

82

A measure of how effectively a company uses its assets83.

o Return on Stockholder‟s Equity

A measure of how well a company used reinvested earnings to

generate additional earnings, equal to a fiscal year's after-tax income84

Liquidity Ratios

o Current Ratio

An indication of a company's ability to meet short-term debt

obligations; the higher the ratio, the more liquid the company is85

.

o Quick Ratio

A measure of a company's liquidity and ability to meet its

obligations86

.

Leverage Ratios

o Debt-to-assets ratio

82 http://www.investorwords.com/3260/net_profit_margin.html 83 http://www.investorwords.com/5776/ROTA.html 84 http://www.investorwords.com/4315/ROE.html 85 http://www.investorwords.com/1258/current_ratio.html 86 http://www.investorwords.com/4008/quick_ratio.html

Page 122: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 121

shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed through

debt. If the ratio is less than one, most of the company's assets are

financed through equity. If the ratio is greater than one, most of the

company's assets are financed through debt. o Debt-to-equity ratio

A measure of a company's financial leverage. Debt/equity ratio is equal

to long-term debt divided by common shareholders' equity.

6.1.3 Key Performance Indicators

Profit Ratios

o Gross Profit Margin

Gross Profit Margin

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 23.65% (0.2365)

23.19% (0.2319)

23.64% (0.2364)

23.31% (0.2331)

TUI Travel PLC 8.35% (0.0835)

7.33% (0.0733)

7.02% (0.702)

Gross Profit Margin

o Net Profit Margin

Net Profit Margin

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 1.84% 2.37% 0.55% 0.17% TUI Travel PLC 0.89 % -1.94 % 0.08% 0.89 %

o Return on Total Assets87

Return on total Assets

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 0.24% 0.80% 2.90% 0% TUI Travel PLC -0.12% -2.91% 0.00% -

o Return on Stockholder‟s Equity

Return on stockholder equity

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 0.85% 2.38% 7.80% 0% TUI Travel PLC -0.45% -10.38% 0.00% -

Liquidity Ratios

o Current Ratio

87 http://www.investorwords.com/3260/net_profit_margin.html

Page 123: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 122

Current Ratio

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 0.40 0.55 0.62 0.57 TUI Travel PLC 0.56 0.71 0.85 -

o Quick Ratio

Quick Ratio

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 0.40 0.55 0.61 0.56 TUI Travel PLC 0.55 0.70 0.84 -

Leverage Ratios

o Debt-to-assets ratio

Debt-to-assets Ratio

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 18.46 17.68 11.29 12.78 TUI Travel PLC 12.62 13.88 23.16 -

o Debt-to-equity ratio

Debt-to-equity Ratio

Year Ended 30/09/09

Year Ended 30/09/08

Year Ended 30/09/07

Year Ended 30/09/06

Thomas Cook Group PLC 71.74 59.25 29.47 35.67 TUI Travel PLC 49.41 48.88 83.71 -

Page 124: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 123

6.2 Marketing 6.2.1 KPI Rationale

Our Team believed that through marketing benchmarking we can see who is a better player

in presenting their product. Who is better on delivering the value to the customers, which

Company scores more customer satisfaction. We do the Marketing benchmarking also in

order to see who is the leading player, Who have the best SWOT for the Tourism Business

6.2.2 Performance / Target

To measure TUI Travel PLC and Thomas Cook Group PLC, we have seven marketing KPIs

with 5 PI :

Mission Statement

“A Mission Statement of the organization’s purpose – what it wants

to accomplish in the larger environment”88.

SWOT Analysis

SWOT analysis is a strategic planning method used to evaluate the

Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a

project or in a business venture. It involves specifying the objective of

the business venture or project and identifying the internal and external

factors that are favorable and unfavorable to achieve that objective89

.

Strategic Objective

The company’s statement needs to be turned into the Strategic

Objectives, which include business objective and marketing

objective to guide management.

Market Position

o Market Dynamics UK & Ireland

o Market Dynamics Continental Europe

o Market Dynamic Northern Europe o Market Dynamics North America

o Market Dynamics Germany

BCG MATRIX

The BCG matrix method is based on the product life cycle theory

that can be used to determine what priorities should be given in

the product portfolio of a business unit. To ensure long-term value

creation, a company should have a portfolio of products that

contains both high-growth products in need of cash inputs and

low-growth products that generate a lot of cash. It has 2

dimensions: market share and market growth. The basic idea

behind it is that the bigger the market share a product has or the

88 TUI Travel Annual Report 2009 89 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis

Page 125: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 124

faster the product's market grows the better it is for the

company90.

Supply Chain

The network of retailers, distributors, transporters, storage facilities

and suppliers that participate in the sale, delivery and production of a

particular product91

.

Distribution Channels

Cross Channel Marketing

E-Commerce

6.2.3 Marketing Key Performance Indicators

6.2.3.1 Mission Statement Thomas Cook Group PLC : Under the global vision “WE GO FURTHER TO MAKE DREAMS

COME TRUE”, Thomas Cook states itself with four different

missions based on five main divisions: UK & Ireland, Continental

Europe and Airlines Germany, Northern Europe, North America.

The differences in the Thomas Cook ´s Mission Statements in

different divisions are related on its flexible business models and

concentrated marketing strategy for every different geography

market.

TUI Travel PLC : “TUI Travel PLC does not have a Mission Statement. We have a

stated strategy which is to create superior shareholder value by

being the world’s leading leisure travel group providing customers

with a wide choice of differentiated and flexible travel experiences

to meet their changing needs To enable us to achieve this goal we

have identified four key strategic imperatives which are linked to

our KPIs.”92

6.2.3.2 SWOT Analysis

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Strengths Market leader in the tourism industry.

Scale (22m passengers out of 21 source markets).

90 valuebasedmanagement. Retrieved 2010, from http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/ 91 http://www.investorwords.com/4823/supply_chain.html 92 FAQS. TUI Travel plc. Retrieved from http://www.tuitravelplc.com/tui/pages/investors/shareholderinfo/faqs

Page 126: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 125

Be a part of TUI AG, an international cooperation, which is operating business in Travel, Hotels and Resorts, Cruises, and major share holder in Container shipping (43.33% holding in Hapag-Lloyd). Unique media methods in marketing (TUI song: Let´s make people smile). Strong multi-channels distribution focusing on online sales. Delivering high quality customers services. Stable and management-friendly shareholders.

Portfolio of strong brands

Speed of decision making and implementation

Industry leading margins

Tailored business model in each market Strong multi-channel distribution capability Asset light model Strong and improving financial position Positive customer feedback: 97% customer satisfaction; 96% would recommend TCNE. Unique concept hotels. No1 market share of Canaries, Majorca, Turkey, Egypt and Rhodes. 25years average industry experience.

Strong partnerships.

Weakness Company registered a net loss of EUR 142 million in 2008 (Annual Report 2008) Major reduction in the volume of holiday packages because of recession and financial uncertainties Heavy Fixed Assets lead to the lack of flexibility and reduce the competition ability when the economic climate has high level of uncertainty. (Fixed assets cover 34% of total assets)

Has no customer retention policy. Has little or no scope outside of Europe. Lack of service, flexibility and business focus (such as frequent flyer programmes) make the low-cost model unappealing for most business travelers. The two drivers of growth, the focus on price and

Page 127: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 126

Maintaining too many different brand names makes the company’s marketing and management expenses become too high.

the focus on convenience (frequent flights, few connections, more nearby airports) are reaching their natural limits. Differentiation from there remains to be difficult. Easy Jet’s own success makes it difficult to recruit and train staff quickly enough

Opportunities Expansion in developing markets such as India and China. Business expansion through further acquisition and mergers. Recovery signs of the world economic after economic recession.

Experts predict great potential for future growth in the next years. The current recession is favorable as people and businesses are more cost-conscious.

More full-service airlines may withdraw from the regional market to focus on more profitable long-haul routes leaving the market to the low-cost operators.

Threats Changing consumer behavior in his global economic recession can influence company’s strategy. Threat of losing consumers who want a low-cost packagers because company’s focus on luxury hotels. Competitors, such as Thomas Cook, are more flexible in business models and strategies.

Competition is likely to intensify, given the saturated market and the shortage of other options. Increased competition is likely to lead to greater difficulties in demanding incentives from communities. Companies cut on business travel in times of economic downturn and because of new time-consuming security measures travel substitutes like videoconferencing are introduced.

Page 128: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 127

6.2.3.3 Strategic Objective Thomas Cook Group PLC :STRENGTHENING OUR BUSINESS AND INVESTING

FOR GROWTH

TUI Travel PLC : “Creating superior shareholder value by being the world’s

leading leisure travel group providing customers with the

widest choice of differentiated and flexible travel experiences to

meet their changing needs.”

Page 129: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 128

6.2.4 Market Position

6.2.4.1 Market Dynamics UK & Ireland

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers93 5.687m 7.6m (Including UK, Ireland, Middle East, and India)

Controlled distribution94

2009 78%

2008 75%

2009 68.6%

2008 67.4%

Market position

Mainsteam sector: #1 (34% market share)95

Mainsteam sector: #2

Financial services (Foreign Exchange market): #4 (7% market share)

Financial services (Foreign Exchange market): #3 (15% market share)

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

• Target further mainstream margin improvement through product and haul mix. • Develop our e-commerce strategy and move into the online travel agency market. • Continue to grow travel-related financial services, notably foreign exchange. • Build on our strong performance in key medium haul destinations outside the Eurozone.

Key Brands

93 94 95

Page 130: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 129

6.2.4.2 Market Dynamics Continental Europe

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers96 9.73m (Including Germany) 7 m Controlled distribution97

2009 46%

2008 40%

2009 38.3%

2008 37.7%

Strategy Expanding the tour operator business in growth markets like Russia and Ukraine. Expanding the market share in the German-speaking volume market for cruises. Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

• Increase sales of exclusive and differentiated product to maintain margin advantage. • Continue to grow online distribution channels and improve dynamic packaging capabilities. • Increase sales to medium haul destinations such as Turkey and North Africa.

Key Brands

96 97

Page 131: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 130

6.2.4.3 Market Dynamic Northern Europe:

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers98 5.687m 1.5m Controlled distribution99

2009 85%

2008 79%

2009 82.7%

2008 79.4%

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

•Further expand internet sales. • Increase the proportion of customers who book our exclusive, concept hotels. • Continue to build on the success of our world class, in-flight sales. • Consolidate our position in the major Nordic outbound destinations of Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Turkey and Thailand.

Key Brands

98 99

Page 132: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 131

6.2.4.4 Market Dynamics North America

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers100

0.54m (Including Mainstream and Specialists and Activity sectors)

1.1m

Controlled distribution101

2009

2008

2009 14.1%

2008 15.7%

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management.

• Pursue flight and accommodation cost savings and strengthen hotel exclusivities. • Grow independent travel through dynamic packaging technology and improved product line. • Strengthen controlled distribution, especially online. • Grow newly launched Financial Services division and expand product range.

Key Brands

100 101

Page 133: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 132

6.2.4.5 Market Dynamics Germany

TUI Travel plc

Thomas Cook

Passengers102

8.775 million (Including Mainstream and Specialists and Activity sectors)

5.9m

Number of aircraft

48 34

Retail Estate

Own shop: 428 Franchise: 974

Ownshop: 166 Franchise: 395

Product Focus

Strong focus on mainstream Highest brand equity in the

Market

Strong focus on mainstream market

Well positioned with Neckermann brand in lower/ budget segment.

Controlled distribution103

2009 46%

2008 40%

2008

2009

Strategy Increasing the proportion of differentiated holidays and strengthening web- based sales. Engaging in pro-active capacitive management in Travel Mainstream business by adjusting flight and hotel commitments to align supply and demand. Focusing on flight-yield differentiated hotel portfolio in TUI Hotel and Resorts Pursuing restrictive cash and working capital management. Expanding the market share in the German-speaking volume market for cruises.

• Focus on cost-saving, especially fuel related efficiencies. • Drive synergies and other benefits through greater co-ordination of activities with other Thomas Cook Group airlines. • Enhance benefits from cooperation with other external airlines.

Key Brands

102 103

Page 134: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 133

6.2.5 BCG MATRIX TUI Travel plc Thomas Cook Star Activity Sector

Specialist & Emerging Extra services (renting car)

Component holiday, Extra (car hire), Activity Sector.

Cash Cows Package holiday

Independent holiday (city breaks),

Financial services (foreign currencies services and Money card, Travel insurances)

Accommodation and Destination (organising meetings, incentives, conferences and events (MICE))

Accommodation Package holidays Specialist Financial services related

to travel

Question Marks

Hotels, resorts Airlines.

Hotels Airlines

Dogs Cruisers Cruisers

Page 135: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 134

6.2.6 Distribution Channels

TUI Thomas Cook

Travel

Agencies

Own retail shops

Franchises

Third- party distributions

Own Travel agencies

Franchises

Third- party distributions

Ecommerce All most every brands have the brand website for customers to book services online

http://www.firstchoice.co.uk/

http://www.thomson.co.uk/

http://www.arke.nl/wintersport.aspx

http://www.tuifly.com/de/

Thomascook.com: Each country

has one website for online

booking.

http://www.thomascook.com/

http://www.thomascook.de/

http://www.thomascook.pl/

http://www.thomascook.fr/

http://www.neckermann-reisen.de/

Telephone

Selling

Call Centers Call Centers

Page 136: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 135

6.3 Management Key Performance Indicators

6.3.1 KPI Rationale

In order to determine TUI Travel PLC or Thomas Cook Group PLC is better, we have to make a

benchmark on their Human Resources. Since management are about the people of the company and

how they work and communicate with each other, we believe that the management is the most

essential part from a company. Since both TUI Travel PLC and Thomas Cook Group PLC is an

International Tourism Company, both of them has hundreds of brands and but has specific needs of

each brands, and specialization in each department, who trains their employees better, that is what

we are going to benchmark in this management key performance indicator.

6.3.2 Performance/Target

Company profile

o Mission Statement

o Vision and Mission

o Sustainability Development and Social Responsibility

Company Organization

o Organizational Structures

o Departmentalization

Human Resources Management

o Recruitment Plan

o Selection

6.3.3 Performance/Target

6.3.3.1Company profile

6.3.3.1.1Mission Statement

Thomas Cook Group PLC: Under the global vision “WE GO FURTHER TO MAKE DREAMS

COME TRUE”, Thomas Cook states itself with four different

missions based on five main divisions: UK & Ireland, Continental

Europe and Airlines Germany, Northern Europe, North America.

The differences in the Thomas Cook ´s Mission Statements in

different divisions are related on its flexible business models and

concentrated marketing strategy for every different geography

market.

Page 137: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 136

TUI Travel PLC : “TUI Travel PLC does not have a Mission Statement. We have a

stated strategy which is to create superior shareholder value by

being the world’s leading leisure travel group providing customers

with a wide choice of differentiated and flexible travel experiences

to meet their changing needs To enable us to achieve this goal we

have identified four key strategic imperatives which are linked to

our KPIs.”104

6.3.3.1.2 Vision and Mission

TUI Travel plc

Their common vision and values unite their across the Group and they call this their TUI

Spirit. Their vision is Making Travel Experiences Special and their four values are:

• Responsible leadership

• Customer obsessed

• Value driven

• Playing to win

Winning behaviours have been developed to help embed these values in every day working

life in a number of ways. These behaviours allow them to truly engage in their work and

optimize their performance – as individuals and as a business.

Thomas Cook

These values are the focus for ensuring that every Thomas Cook employee embraces what

they stand for and are PROUD to work with us delivering customer service that‟s second to

none.

6.3.3.1.3 Sustainability Development

TUI Travel

Throughout the year, sustainable development has continued to be an important part of the

business agenda for TUI Travel. They aspire to lead in sustainable development within the

leisure travel industry. In the long term, they believe this goal will help build shareholder

value for TUI Travel and contribute to operating a strong business now and in the future.

104 FAQS. TUI Travel plc. Retrieved from http://www.tuitravelplc.com/tui/pages/investors/shareholderinfo/faqs

Page 138: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 137

• TUI Travel is listed on the FTSE4Good Index in recognition of its transparency and for

meeting strict social, environmental and governance standards.

• It is the highest placed travel company, at 16, in the 2008 Good Companies Guide – The

Observer‟s annual ethical ranking of FTSE350 companies.

• TUI Travel‟s first full Sustainable Development Report was published in July 2009, with

independent verification of their targets by Bureau Veritas.

• For the second consecutive year, they have been included in the Carbon Disclosure

Leadership Index, which highlights the top 10% of FTSE350 companies that have displayed

the most professional approach to climate change disclosure.

Sustainable development strategy of TUI Travel Plc

During 2008/2009, they developed a Group sustainable development policy in conjunction

with key colleagues, articulating their vision and approach to sustainable development. The

Group Code of Conduct covers a wide range of sustainability issues, including human rights,

business ethics and transparency and commits TUI Travel to upholding the principles of the

UN Global Compact.

TUI Travel‟s sustainable development strategy is based on consideration of the key issues

affecting the Company, now and in the future. It has been developed in consultation with

internal and external stakeholders. They encourage all TUI Travel businesses to develop their

own sustainable development strategy, aligning with Group priorities. At the end of

2008/2009, 73% of TUI Travel businesses had their own sustainable development strategy.

Policy and mitigation for Groupwide risks relating to sustainability are facilitated by the

Group Risk Management and Sustainable Development Departments, with responsibility for

managing such risks also shared by the businesses themselves.

Thomas Cook plc

The last year has proved a testing time for all areas of business, not least the travel industry.

The global economic downturn brought with it a decline in international tourism in 2009,

intensified by many other factors including consumer confidence, terrorism incidents,

fluctuating exchange rates and the outbreak of swine flu.

At Thomas Cook Group, their response to challenging market conditions is to work harder

and go further to make dreams come true for their customers. They recognize the many

virtues of travel, the positive cultural exchange and the boost to local economies, but they are

also aware of the potential impact on the environment, societies and local cultures. The travel

and tourism industry has a responsibility to operate in a sustainable way and Thomas Cook,

which founded its business with clear social and educational intentions, is proactive in this

area.

They aim to have sustainability at the core of their business and feature it as an integral part

of their strategy, particularly when it comes to the environment. These responsibilities no

longer sit on the periphery; their importance represents a genuine business risk. Society,

customers, investors, governments and communities no longer look for, but demand that both

Page 139: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 138

time and money be invested in the preservation and protection of the incredible people and

places they come into contact with.

Over 160 years ago a former preacher, Thomas Cook, devised the first package holiday.

Since then, the business he founded has helped millions of people to relax, unwind – and

broaden their horizons. Thomas Cook didn‟t just want people to have fun. He believed

affordable travel could change working people‟s lives for the better. His company was

inspired by a strong sense of social justice and moral responsibility: what today they call

corporate social responsibility (CSR).

Today, they‟re still inspired by their founder‟s values. They believe they make a world of

difference – not only to their customers, but to all the people whose lives they touch. Their

mission is to perfect the personal leisure experience. And that includes managing their

activities in a morally and socially responsible manner.

Page 140: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 139

6.3.3.2Company Organisation

6.3.3.2.1 Organizational Structures

TUI Travel plc Organizational structures

TUI Travel plc Organizational structures chart:

Page 141: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 140

6.3.3.2.1 Departmentalization

TUI is using Geographical Departmentalization, which means groups jobs according to

Geographical Region.

Advantages and disadvantages of Geographical Departmentalization105

Advantages Disadvantages

More effective and efficient handling

of specific regional issues that arise

Serve needs of unique geography

market better

Duplication of functions

Can feel isolated from other

organization areas

Thomas Cook Organizational structures

Thomas Cook has a more flexible organization structure, which is combined by Geographical

Departmentalization and Functional Departmentalization (Groups Jobs according to function).

Advantages and disadvantages of Geographical Departmentalization106

Advantages Disadvantages

More effectives from putting together people with common skills,

knowledge, and orientations.

Coordination with function areas

In depth specialization.

Poor communication across functional areas

Limited view of organizationalngoals

105 Robbins, S. P., & Coutler, M. (2009). Management. (tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. 106 Robbins, S. P., & Coutler, M. (2009). Management. (tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Page 142: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 141

6.3.3.2.2 Recruitment Plan

TUI Travel plc

Apprenticeship programme

Content and delivery

TUI Horizons107

Recruiting for their long term success108

Thomas Cook

The recruitment process onto STARS is rigorous and the required standard must be reached.

Staff are expected to complete a range of tasks which have direct links to the company

PROUD values. The tasks can be small (such as controlling the airport) or large (like

organising a fund raising event in resort). Staff are expected to achieve a pass grade for each

task and only when they have achieved the pass grade for all tasks set will they have passed

the STARS in resort stage. A key benefit of STARS is that it assists with succession planning,

enabling suitable employees to be identified and trained for the next level. This in turn can

help ensure staff are retained and promoted from within the business.

107 ). Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/ 108 ). Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

Page 143: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 142

Chapter 7. References

1. (2010). IBMS Course Guide. Deventer, The Netherlands: Saxion University of

Applied Sciences.

2. 2.Kotler, Armstrong, Wong and Saunders (2008). Principles of Marketing. (5th

European edition .). Prientice Hall.

3. Saunders, Lewis and Thotnhill (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. (5 th

ed.). Prientice

4. Berenson, M. L., Levine, D. M., & Krehbiel, T. C. (2006). Basic Business Statistic.

(tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

5. Robbins, S. P., & Coutler, M. (2009). Management. (tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson

Education,Inc.

6. Gowthorpe, C. (2005). BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE. (2nd ed.).

Italy: Thomson.

7. (2009). PrelimannouncementThomasCook. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved

from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

8. (2009). annual report Thomas Cook 2008-4. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved

from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

9. (2009). Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from

https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

10. (2009). AnnualReportand TUI Accounts08. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved

from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

11. valuebasedmanagement. Retrieved February 2010, from

http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/

12. THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS. Cengage Learning. Retrieved February

06, 2010, from

http://college.cengage.com/business/resources/casestudies/students/financial.htm.

Page 144: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 143

13. Industry Profiles: Travel Agencies and Services Travel Agencies and Services. First

Research. Retrieved February 06, 2010, from http://www.firstresearch.com/Industry-

Research/Travel-Agencies-and-Services.html

14. http://www.etoa.org/Directory.aspx

15. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism

16. http://www.cbi.eu/?pag=84&doc=3116

17. http://www.wikitravel.org

18. http://www.wikitravel.org

Page 145: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 144

FINANCIAL APPENDICES

Thomas Cook 2009

Thomas Cook 2008

Property, Plant & Equipment

Thomas Cook 2007 Aircraft and Freehold Land

Short Other Total

Aircraft Spares and Buildings Leaseholds Fixed Assets Cost

At 1 November 2005 1091.18772 243.91584 121.46841 187.69212 553.07637 Additions 3.77622 0.76923 6.15384 12.51747 19.44054

Exchange differences 0.34965 0.27972 0.76923 0.41958 1.46853 Disposals -16.43355 -6.993 -5.03496 -4.61538 -16.64334

Disposal of subsidiary undertakings – -83.35656 -6.08391 -31.95801 -121.39848 Transfer to non-current assets held for sale – -22.93704 – -10.55943 -47.9 At 31 October 2006 1,078.88 131.67819 117.27261 153.49635 402.44715

Additions 4.40559 2.30769 5.94405 12.72726 20.979

Acquisitions (note 18) – MyTravel 203.77602 54.26568 14.26572 38.67129 107.20269 – other – – – 0.06993 0.06993 Exchange differences -8.25174 -0.48951 -3.28671 -3.35664 -7.13286 Transfer from non-current assets held for sale – – 2.37762 5.38461 7.76223 Reclassifi cation – 0.48951 -0.06993 -0.41958 -

Disposals -27.76221 -0.34965 -0.34965 -3.28671 -9.37062 At 31 October 2007 1,251.05 187.90191 130.7691 203.28651 521.95752

Page 146: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 145

EUR/GBP 31 October 2007 0.6993

Thomas Cook 2007 Converted to Poundsterling

TUI Travel PLC 2008

Page 147: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 146

TUI Travel PLC 2009

Page 148: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 147

Appendices 2.2

Acquisitions Thomas Cook Group PLC 2008

Acquisitions TUI Travel PLC 2008

Page 149: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 148

Appendices 2.3

TUI Current Asset 2008

TUI Cash & Cash Equivalent 2008

TUI Assets Classifieds as held for sale 2008

TUI Current Trade and other payables 2008

Page 150: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 149

Thomas Cook Current asset 2007

Thomas Cook Cash and Cash Equivalent 2007

Thomas Cook Trade and Other Payables 2007

Page 151: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 150

Thomas Cook Current Asset 2008

Thomas Cook Liabilities 2008

Thomas Cook Derivative Financial Instrument

Thomas Cook‟s 2008 Trade and Other Receivables

Page 152: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 151

Thomas Cook Current Asset 2009

Thomas Cook Current Liabilities 2009

Thomas Cook Financial Derivative 2009

Thomas Cook Borrowings 2009

Page 153: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 152

TUI Travel PLC Current Asset 2009

TUI Travel PLC Current Liabilities 2009

TUI Travel PLC Cash & Cash Equivalent

TUI Travel PLC Asset Classified as held for sale

Page 154: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 153

Appendixes 3

Page 155: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 154

Project Organizational Analysis

Page 156: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 155

Table of Contents

1. Introduction.................................................................................................... 3

2. Objective of the assignment........................................................................ 4

3. Central research question............................................................................ 5

4. Sub questions............................................................................................... 6

5. Procedures and methods............................................................................. 7

6. Project organisation..................................................................................... 8

7. Quality control............................................................................................... 9

8. Time Planning................................................................................................ 10

9. Preconditions................................................................................................ 14

10. Literature....................................................................................................... 15

11. Cooperation Agreement Group 7................................................................ 17

12. Declaration of approval................................................................................ 20

13. Feedback Form Milestones......................................................................... 22

Page 157: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 156

1. Introduction

For the coming the second periods, we are going to set up a bench mark. It is based on

benchmarking Key Performance Indicators (KPI‟s) of the two representative firms of the

travel industry, TUI and Thomas Cook. As a group of 5 international IBMS students we are

going to analyze and find out the best way about the objective.

In the first period of the project we will hand in a report in which about our project. In

addition to this, we will clear every trend and development with current and factual data.

Next to this, we will make interviews to improve our project.

In the second period, we will analyze information which we have collected. We will focus on

several separate aspects: Project organization, Quality control, marketing and Accounting.

The aim is to find information necessary to make our first report complete and to find more

information about the several aspects mentioned above.

For deeper insights, we are going to do desk research with one in-depth interview. Further we

will use the knowledge of last, and the books of this school year. Most of the information will

be secondary data, but we will also look for primary data like scientific articles and annual

reports.

Page 158: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 157

2. Objective of the project Organizational analysis:

Set up a bench mark based on quick scans of two representative firms of the travel industry,

TUI and Thomas Cook by identifying and comparing the Key Performance Indicators of the

firms in order to find out “who is best in class”.

Page 159: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 158

3. Central Research Question:

Among TUI and Thomas Cook, which travel firm is better in business process and

performance according to benchmarking the Key Performance Indicators?

Page 160: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 159

4. Sub Question:

Travel Industry Analysis

What is travel industry?

How does the travel industry produce value and profit?

What is the Business model of travel firms in European market?

How much profit dose the whole travel industries generate?

How is the Tourism market divided?

What are the roles of TUI and Thomas Cook in European travel industry?

Case Financial Analysis

What are the financial position of TUI and Thomas Cook?

In order to determine their financial positions, which are their financial performance

ratios should be based on?

How are the profit ratios of TUI and Thomas Cook?

How are the liquidity ratios of TUI and Thomas Cook?

How are the activity ratios of TUI and Thomas Cook?

How are the leverage ratios of TUI and Thomas Cook?

How are the shareholder-return ratios of the two firms?

What are the financial forecasts of TUI and Thomas Cook?

Case Management & Organisation Analysis

What are the structure of TUI and Thomas Cooks‟ Organisations?

How do they manage their human resources?

What are personnel training programs in the two firms?

What do TUI and Thomas Cook do to control their service quality?

How do they develop their management strategies?

Case Marketing Analysis

What are the marketing models of TUI and Thomas Cook?

What are their marketing objectives?

What are the target market of TUI and Thomas Cook?

How do they position and segment their target markets?

How are their marketing performances?

How they promote their products?

Who are their competitors?

In order to compete, which is their pricing strategy?

Which strategies TUI and Thomas Cook apply to improve their marketing

performances?

Page 161: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 160

Case E-commerce UPS

What is e-commerce?

Which are common applications related to e-commerce activities of TUI and Thomas

Cook?

How much profit do e-commerce activities create for the two firms?

Key Performance Indicators

What are the Key Performance Indicators?

Which parts of the firms need to look at in order to identify their Key Performance

Indicators?

What are the Key Performance Indicators to compare TUI and Thomas Cooks?

What are the similarities between TUI and Thomas Cook?

What are the differences between the two travel firms regarding to business domains?

Which firm is scored better about Key Performance Indicators?

Page 162: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 161

5. Procedures, methods

In this project our task is to set up a bench mark based on quick scans of two representative

firms of the travel industry to find out “who is the best in class”, depending on this objective,

we will get our information through internet, newspaper and magazines. Due to primary data

is costly and difficult to gain access, so most of our source will be secondary data.

According to our research questions and objectives, we decide to conduct different types of

research methods in different phrases. In the first phrase, we will collect data on each aspect

of these two companies and then make objective conclusions about the current condition. It is

descriptive research we are going to apply in this stage. In the second phrase, the explorative

methods play the dominant role in analyzing the interpreting the data. Because we need to

explore the reason why we think the chosen company is “better” than the other one. In

addition, interviews are needed to gain more reliable and valid data. And we will negotiate

with organizations in a proper way; carefully design our individual questions on

questionnaires.

Page 163: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 162

6. Project organization

We have 4 nationalities in our group, namely Indonesia, Vietnam, Iraq and Rumania. So

according to different strong point of each other, after discussion, we divide our task as this

frame: Ivander is good at organizing and creative thinking, so he will be the people who

make an overall plan for us. Duong will take care of the layout of each deliverables. Mo and

Dan will in charge of examining quality of group work. And Gework will do the job of

summaries our weekly questions before our supervision time.

Page 164: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 163

7. Quality control

We have reached an agreement that high quality of our deliverables is the most important part

of our performance. In case of misunderstandings which are caused by incorrect grammar and

spellings, an effective way of quality control has been made. First, after we finish our

assigned parts, the special spelling check system in WORD will be used to help with

grammar. Then we put up our parts on the public igoogle account, everyone in our group can

comment others work by direct edit. After that, Ivander and Duong will check all of the work

and set a final version of deliverable. We are going to do our best to make our performance

without grammar, spelling as well as logical mistakes.

Page 165: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 164

8. Time Planning

Week Deliverables are in

bold below Activities Person

in

charge

Time Group

Deadli

ne

Deliverables

final

deadlines

Meeting with

Supervisor

Comment

3.1 Milestone 1: Plan

of Action Making

groups, preparation

cooperation

agreement.

Mind mapping and

pre-research

Group meeting 01.02

03.02

05.02

Meeting with our supervisor (Mr. Tartarin) every Friday afternoon to discuss about the milestones and project group process.

Discuss

questions

Cooperation

Agreements

Introduction 06.02at 12AM

Time Planning

Preconditions

Declaration

Procedures

Project

Organization

Quality Control

Objective of the

assignment

Central research

question

Sub question

Literature

3.2 Group Meeting

About Milestone2

All

group

member

s

08.02

12.02

Dispense

personal

working

Making a plan and

divide tasks to

search data about

Travel Industry

Profile

Hand in

Milestone 1 on

08.02. at 5 PM

Travel industry

overview

13.02

at 12

AM

Development

trends

Challenges

Financial

information

Industry forecasts

Questions about

milestone2

All

Group

member

s

3.3 Milestone 2

Travel Industry

analysis

Group Meeting +

Questions

All

group

member

s

15.02

17.02

19.02

Dispense

personal

working

Analyzing the

collected data to

20.02

at 12

Page 166: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 165

make Travel

Industry Profile AM

Questions about

milestone2

Spring Holiday Break

3.4 Group Meeting +

Questions

All

Group

member

s

22.02

24.02

26.02

27.02

at 12

AM

Hand in

Milestone 2 on

01.03 at 5 PM

Meeting with our

supervisor every Friday

afternoon to discuss about the

milestones and project

group process.

Dispense

personal

working

Making a plan and

divide tasks about

milestone3

Search for financial

performances of 2

firms

3.5 Milestone 3.

Case Financial

analysis

Group Meeting +

Questions

All

group

member

s

01.03 06.03

at 12

AM

Dispense

personal

working

Analyzing the

collected data

about Financial

information.

Profit ratio

liquidity ratios

activity ratios

leverage ratios

shareholder-return

ratios

3.6 Group Meeting +

questions about

Milestone4

All

group

member

s

08.03

10.03

12.03

Hand in

Milestone 3 on

08.03 at 5 PM

Dispense

personal

working

Making a plan and

divide tasks

Collecting data

about Management

and Organization

performances of 2

firms

13.03

at 12

AM

3.7 Milestone 4

Case:

Management &

Organization

Group Meeting +

questions

All

group

member

s

15.03

17.03

19.03

Dispense

personal

working

Analyzing the

collected data

about Management

and Organization

performances of 2

firms

18.03

at 12

AM

3.8-

3.9 Study week/ retake exams period 2 Exam period

Page 167: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 166

4.1 Group Meeting +

questions about

Milestone5

Making a plan and

divide tasks

All

group

member

s

05.04

07.04

09.04

Hand in

Milestone 4 on

05.04 at 5 PM

Collecting data

about Marketing

performances and

strategies of TUI

and Thomas Cook

10.04

at 12

AM

4.2 Milestone 5: Case

Marketing

Group Meeting +

questions

All

group

member

s

12.04

14.04

16.04

Analyzing the

collected data

about Marketing

performances and

strategies of TUI

and Thomas Cook

17.04

at 12

AM

4.3 Group Meeting +

questions about

Milestone6

All

group

member

s

19.04

21.04

23.04

Hand in

Milestone 5 on

19.04 at 5 PM

Making a plan and

divide tasks

Collecting data

about Case E-

commerce UPS

24.04

at 12

PM

Analyzing the

collected data

about Case E-

commerce UPS

May holiday Break

4.4 Milestone 6:

Case E-

commerce UPS

Group Meeting +

questions about

Milestone 6 and 7

All

group

member

s

26.04

28.04

30.04

Hand in

Milestone 6 on

03.05

at 5 PM

Making a plan and

divide tasks about

milestone7

01.05

at 12

PM

Collecting data about

Key Performance

Indicators

4.5 Milestone 7: Key

Performance

Indicators

Group Meeting +

questions about

Milestone7

All

group

member

s

03.05

05.05

07.05

Hand in

Milestone 7 on

07.05 at 1 PM

Analyzing the

collected data

about KPI of 2

firms

05.05at 12

AM

4.6-

4.7

Writing the

Benchmark report Group Meeting +

questions about the

Benchmark report

All

group

member

s

10.05

12.05

15.05

17.05

Hand in Report

Benchmark

travel industry

on Thursday 12

Making a plan and

Page 168: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 167

divide tasks about

the Benchmark

report

19.05

21.05

PM

Writing the

Benchmark report 20.05

at 12

AM

Checking the

report draft

Checking and

printing out final

report

21.05

4.8 Study week en

retake Period 3 Group meeting to

divide tasks about

Presentation.

Prepare the slides

Presenters

4.9 Exam period

Peer evaluation

Presentation

Benchmark Travel

Industry Oral defense

+

Peer evaluation

4.10 Exam week

Retake project

report (when/if

necessary)

Retake oral

defense (if

necessary)

Retake project report

Retake oral defense

Page 169: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 168

9. Precondition:

There are several possible limitations may emerge during the project, and only stick to the

time planning and finish our report on time are not enough to make our project perfect. We

only have 20 weeks to make a complete and high-quality report. Since we are all the new

student of IBMS, so we are lack of practical experience about management and organisation,

we need ask advices from our project supervisors and teachers in order to accomplish our

project objective.

First of all, we are working in a group within three different nationalities. It is very important

to communicate with each other in a proper way and keep our group moving on.

Secondly, in the second phrase, before the interview conduct in the real context, we have to

design a questionnaire in a logical layout, which is very difficult to achieve. After discussion,

we regard pilot test a best way out.

In addition, our group members should not be shy to present their ideas. We can only

improve ourselves by exchanging ideas with each other.

Page 170: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 169

10. Literature

1. (2010). IBMS Course Guide. Deventer, The Netherlands: Saxion University of

Applied Sciences.

1. 2.Kotler, Armstrong, Wong and Saunders (2008). Principles of Marketing. (5th

European edition .). Prientice Hall.

2. Saunders, Lewis and Thotnhill (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. (5 th

ed.). Prientice

3. Berenson, M. L., Levine, D. M., & Krehbiel, T. C. (2006). Basic Business Statistic.

(tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

4. Robbins, S. P., & Coutler, M. (2009). Management. (tenth ed.). New Jersey: Pearson

Education,Inc.

5. Gowthorpe, C. (2005). BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE. (2nd ed.).

Italy: Thomson.

6. (2009). PrelimannouncementThomasCook. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved

from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

7. (2009). annual report Thomas Cook 2008-4. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved

from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

8. (2009). Annual report TUI 2009-1. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved from

https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

9. (2009). AnnualReportand TUI Accounts08. Saxion University G-Drive. Retrieved

from https://homeaccess.saxion.nl/NetStorage/

10. valuebasedmanagement. Retrieved February 2010, from

http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/

Page 171: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 170

11. THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS. Cengage Learning. Retrieved February

06, 2010, from

http://college.cengage.com/business/resources/casestudies/students/financial.htm.

12. Industry Profiles: Travel Agencies and Services Travel Agencies and Services. First

Research. Retrieved February 06, 2010, from http://www.firstresearch.com/Industry-

Research/Travel-Agencies-and-Services.html

Page 172: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 171

Cooperation Agreement Group 6 (Period 4)

Contact information:

Names (Student Number)

Class

Telephone numbers

E-mail addresses

6. Name: Pham ThuyDuong,(2430318)

Class: DIM1VC

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 0684103949

7. Name: Ivander Laurentius Atmojo (2430243)

Class: DIM1VA

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 0681103403

8. Name: Corhana Dan Andrei (2430403)

Class: DIM1VA

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 0634456259

9. Name: Gework Petrosjan (2431488)

Class: DIM1VB

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 0634456259

10. Name: Mohammed Ababakar (2431451)

Class: DIM1VB

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 0614575660

Foundation for cooperation and

basic rules

- Have a sense of responsibility for our project work

- Attend all meetings

Page 173: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 172

- Be on time for meetings, or notice your absence

- The language that will be spoken is English

- Follow the planning as discussed and stick to it

- Show initiative and be open for ideas

- Be polite to each other

Rules of presence and absence.

Part of these rules is about the

way in which the group members

address one another in the case of

failures.

- Have 2 official group meetings per week.

- Be on time for each meeting (if you cannot come, please

contact other members before at least 2 hours in advance,

or you will be get a warning, and 2 warning means that you

are kicked out)

- Each group member will be assigned as chairman once.

So always be prepared to be a chairman, send the agenda

one day before the meeting.

Rules of participation

- The whole group is equal so everyone has to show their

best and to work as a team

- Everybody agrees on taking each other seriously and

help each.

Rules of reporting - Upload your task on our public igoogle account

- Everyone is going to use the same layout which is

Times New Roman 12

- Always use the British Spell Check before sending your

work

- Our deadline for each week will be 12:00 am on

Saturday!

- The work of any member will be checked by the other

group members and improved if necessary

Agreements as to how to interact

with one another

- The language that will be spoken is English

Page 174: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 173

- Everyone should give his own opinion

- Act as a group (teamwork!!!)

- If there are any problems or worries just talk about it so

it won‟t stay in the way of our work

Intercultural - Show respect to each other‟s culture and be aware of

cultural difference

- Always communicate each other in English but not

your mother tongue

- Try your best to achieve cultural synergy

I agree with all the group rules and targets in this agreement and I will do my best to

achieve a better result.

Pham Thuy Duong Ivander Laurentius Atmojo

Corhana Dan Andrei Gework Petrosjan

Mohammed Ababakar

Page 175: Project Organisation Analysis Report FINAL

Page | 174

Declaration of approval

11. Name: Pham Thuy Duong,(2430318)

Class: DIM1VC

12. Name: Ivander Laurentius Atmojo (2430243)

Class: DIM1VA

13. Name: Corhana Dan Andrei (2430403)

Class: DIM1VA

14. Name: Gework Petrosjan (2431488)

Class: DIM1VB

15. Name: Mohammed Ababakar (2431451)

Class: DIM1VB

Hereby declare that:

1. The Report is our own work and no author‟s rights/copyrights have been violated.

2. All sources (inclusive Internet/WebPages) used have been mentioned source

indications as footnotes.

3. The following work does not contain more than 5% work of other people or

sources.

Place: Deventer, the Netherlands

Date:

Signatures

Pham Thuy Duong Ivander Laurentius Atmojo

Corhana Dan Andrei Gework Petrosjan

Mohammed Ababakar