PRESIDENT BRITISH PRECAST ANDREW DIX. Bespoke Precast – March 2009 Steel Beams Ready for encasing...

download PRESIDENT BRITISH PRECAST ANDREW DIX. Bespoke Precast – March 2009 Steel Beams Ready for encasing in concrete.

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of PRESIDENT BRITISH PRECAST ANDREW DIX. Bespoke Precast – March 2009 Steel Beams Ready for encasing...

  • Slide 1
  • PRESIDENT BRITISH PRECAST ANDREW DIX
  • Slide 2
  • Bespoke Precast March 2009 Steel Beams Ready for encasing in concrete.
  • Slide 3
  • Steel reinforcement welded to beams
  • Slide 4
  • During Production
  • Slide 5
  • Finished Product
  • Slide 6
  • 30 th March 2009 14:10PM
  • Slide 7
  • John Mott Married 47 Years of Age Worked for the Company and its predecessor for nearly 20 years
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • March 2011
  • Slide 13
  • From the Sheffield Star March 24 th 2011 Safety systems were inadequate at a South Yorkshire factory where a steelworker was crushed to death by a girder, an inquest heard. A nine-member jury recorded a narrative verdict of safety failings at the plant yesterday, just a week short of the second anniversary of the tragedy.
  • Slide 14
  • Sheffield Crown Court October 2012
  • Slide 15
  • On 12 th October 2012 Bespoke Precast was fined 100,000 and ordered to pay 42,471 in costs after pleading guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act.
  • Slide 16
  • Bernard Thorogood defending apologised on behalf of Bespoke. "This was a company with a genuine and sincere record of health and safety. "It's not in any way a company in dereliction of its duty. "It was a significant oversight but not accurate to call the failure systematic." Imposing a fine of 100,000, judge Graham Robinson said Bespoke had failed to protect the safety of Mr Mott and fallen woefully short of what it ought to have done.
  • Slide 17
  • The real tragedy in this case is it is not a fly by night, penny- pinching company but quite the reverse. "In the context the company had a very good health and safety record and co-operated fully. "It is not a case where the defending business failed to heed previous warnings or traded safety for a financial motive."
  • Slide 18