The Metrical Dinshenchas vol 2 edited by Edward Gwynn (1906)
Presented by Karen W. Gwynn LS 590.902 – Metadata University of Alabama Prof. Steven MacCall...
-
Upload
erica-short -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Presented by Karen W. Gwynn LS 590.902 – Metadata University of Alabama Prof. Steven MacCall...
Presented by Karen W. Gwynn
LS 590.902 – MetadataUniversity of AlabamaProf. Steven MacCall
Spring 2011
Encoded Archival Description (EAD)
IntroductionWhy the EAD Schema is Needed History of the EADCurrent Controlling PartyLeft Side ElementsRules for Right Side Data Entry
Encoded Archival Description
http://www.loc.gov/ead/
The Encoded Archival Description (EAD) is used for encoding finding aids in an online environment
Finding aids are the primary means archives, museums, manuscript repositories, and libraries describe their archival and special collections
EAD provides standardization of finding aids within and across collections
Introduction
Formally defined by a DTD – Document Type Definition
Designed to semantically identify units of information using primary source materials in archival collections
Source: http://www.archivists.org/saagroups/ead/aboutEAD.html
Introduction (con’t)
http://pike.services.brown.edu/bamco/bamco.php?eadid=msdenison
Ability to:present extensive and interrelated descriptive
information found in archival finding aidspreserve the hierarchical relations existing
between levels of descriptionrepresent descriptive information inherited by one
hierarchical level from anothermove within a hierarchical informational structureand to support element-specific indexing and
retrieval(EAD Working Group, 2006)
Need for a Specialized Schema
1993Group @ Berkeley Library/UC
develop an encoding standard for finding aids used by libraries, archives, museums, and manuscript repositories
different coding schemasGopher presentation of an unmarked ASCII text; HTML marked-up ASCII tags; MARC tagging with new MARC Z39.2 record
structure or SGML
Selected Standard General Markup Language (SGML)
History of the EAD
looking at this today,
conspicuously absent --
an XML solution. It did not exist in 1993!
SGML required a Document Type Definition (DTD) to set the order of markup tags for encoding documents of similar cases.
Finding aids basically follow a similar structure, making SGML DTD a good match.
History of the EAD (con’t)Why SGML?
1995Review of the Berkeley team’s SGML DTD by archival
standards group Archival standards group agreed to:
“collaborate in the production of 1) finding aid encoding standard design principles; 2) a revised finding aid data model; 3) a revised finding aid document type definition; 4) finding aid encoding guidelines and examples; and 5) an article describing the teams understanding of the structure and content of finding aids.”
The term “Encoded Archival Description” – EAD – was first used.
History of the EAD (con’t)
1995 (con’t)
Society of American Archivists “assumed some responsibility for involving interested archivists.”
Eventually the SAA’s EAD Working Group “accepted responsibility for monitoring and supporting the ongoing development of the EAD DTD, tag library, and application guidelines.” The Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office was then asked to serve as the maintenance agency for the EAD DTD.
History of the EAD (con’t)
February 1996 Alpha release: Not perfect, but good enough
April 1996 Beta release
1996 – 1998 Refinements continued in preparation for release of Version
1.0 However, emergence of XML (eXtensible Markup Language)
slowed the release until the DTD could be revised to be completely compatible.
2002SGML/XML compatible version 2.0 released
History of the EAD (con’t)
The standard is maintained in The Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress in partnership with the Society of American Archivists.
The Network Development and MARC Standards Office provides “library and information network standards and planning in the Library of Congress,” including, but not limited to, MARC, MODS, METS, Z39.50, EAD, and PREMIS.
Current Controlling Party
Early element development used Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) as the basis for identifying the left side elements. Instead of building a large set of elements, elements are expanded through a group of Attributes.
Currently146 ElementsEasily mapped to content standards
DACS (Describing Archives: A Content Standard) and ISAD(G) (General International Standard Archival Description)
and structural standards MARC and Dublin Core
(Wikipedia: Encoded Archival Description)
Left Side Elements
There are a minimum set of elements needed to structure a DTD
Remaining elements are optional
Left Side Elements (con’t)
Left Side Elements (con’t)
Required
elements are
shown in bold.
Element
structure
demonstrates the
hierarchical
nature of the EAD
DTD
All standards are fully defined in the Encoded Archival Description Tag Library, Version 2002
Various Best Practices Guides are also available:Library of Congress:
EAD Best Practices at the Library of Congress Research Library Group: RLG
Best Practices Guidelines for Encoded Archival Description
Online Archives of California OAC Best Practices Guidelines for EAB (maintained by the California Digital Libraries, e.g., CDL).
Rules for Right Side Data Entry