Present by. Overview Introduction S.W.O.T. Analysis Problems Market Segmentation Positioning...
-
Upload
william-archibald-strickland -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
1
Transcript of Present by. Overview Introduction S.W.O.T. Analysis Problems Market Segmentation Positioning...
Introduction
1972-1986 : The origins of brand1987-1993 : The glory years 1991: Distribution jumped over to West Coast 1992 : Snapple sold to a Boston private bank1994-1997 : Quaker takes command 1994 : Quaker buys Snapple for $1.7 billion1997 : Triarc acquires Snapple 1997 : Triarc buys Snapple for $300 million
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
Growth ofSnapple
Annual Sales Revenue, 1972-1997
$ Millions
Alternative Beverage category, 1997
24%
24%
19%
16%
17% Premium(e.g.,Snapple)
Non-Premium(e.g.,Lipton)Bottled Water
Sports Drink
100% Juice
Total Alternative Beverage Category: $10 Billion at Wholesale
Supermarket Brand Shares, 1997
35%
12%4%9%
11%
29%Snapple
Ocean Spray
Nestea
Lipton
Arizona
All Others
Total Supermarket Alternative Beverage Category: $3 Billion at Wholesale
Snapple Flavors ( %of cases in 1996)
(1) Lemon Tea 15 %(2) Kiwi Strawberry 7(3) Mango Madness 5 (4) Peach Tea 5(5) Pink Lemonade 5(6) Diet Peach Tea 4(7) Fruit Punch 4(8) Raspberry Tea 4(9) Diet Lemon Tea 3(10) Diet Raspberry Tea 3 Top 10 of 50 Flavors 55 %
SWOT AnalysisStrength:
1. Brand image - natural, quirky, offbeat, playful, personal, authentic2. Full of variety and flavor - diverse product line - over 50 flavors3. Brand name - snap; appleimplicit health claims4. Imaginative use of names - e.g., Mango Madness
SWOT AnalysisStrength: ( Cont.. )
5. Adoption - most new drinkers had been aware of Snapple - Snapple drinking flows are through friendship network6. Packaging - plays out the taste experience - complexity of the label, stippling on bottle
SWOT AnalysisWeakness:
1. Not an established brand - like a fashion water - differentiation is weak - lacks a compelling reason to use2. Distribution - Quaker was wrong3. Usage rate - fluctuates seasonally, diurnally, and cyclically4. Regional Differences - areas without a postmodern mindset
SWOT AnalysisOpportunities:
1. More variety, imagination, and flavor than competitors 2. The diversity within Snapple Brand - a model for a multicultural society3. No great competitors - Snapple is fun in a way unduplicated by any other brand of soft drink - no competing brands stand out at the time4. Health concern5. Future trend is going to be individualism.
SWOT AnalysisThreats:
1. Rumor - deep sense of betrayal by customers 2. Distribution - warm or cold?3. Image - effect of Quaker: fashion lifestyle
Problems
•Corporate Image•Spokesmodel Disappear•Inappropriate Distribution•Product Size•Lack of Innovation•Pricing
Market Segmentation
•Geographic: Urban areas in U.S. & foreign countries
•Demographic: Right people
•Psychologic: Active lifestyle
4PPlace
Promotion
Price
Product
•Product: Smaller bottle, Product and packaging innovation•Place: Cold channel + Warm channel
•Promotion: Spokesman•Price: No discount
Recommendations•Reestablishing Image - Real - Natural - Good for you
•Distribution - Niche Marketing - National - A Network of Distributors - Warehouse Distribution
•Price - High
Recommendations
•Bottle Design - Smaller - Convenient - Ready to drink - Just fits in your hand
•Promotion - Advertisement - Sampling
•New Products Development - Health - Diet