Practice & Scope of Oral-Craniomaxillofacial Surgery · 9 Clinical Approach surgical procedures...
Transcript of Practice & Scope of Oral-Craniomaxillofacial Surgery · 9 Clinical Approach surgical procedures...
1
Practice & Scope
of
Oral-Craniomaxillofacial Surgery
Roberto M. Pangan DMD., MD.
Clinical Assoc. Prof
Craniomaxillofacial-Plastic Surgery Section
Dept. of ENT – U.P. P.G.H.
D.M.D. / D.D.S.
Otorhinolaryngology
Plastic surgery
Ophthalmology
Craniomaxillofacial Surgery
orthopedic
Neurosurgery
2
Pathologic Physiologic
ANATOMIC UNIT
( Face )
Functional - Aesthetic
Reconstructive Surgery
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cleft Anomaly
Persistence of embryonic clefts
Cleft lip-palate Facial cleft
9
Clinical Approach
surgical procedures non-surgical procedures
cheiloplastypalatoplastyventilation tube insertionalveolar bone graftingvelopharyngoplastycolumellar lengtheningorthognathic surgerydistraction osteogenesisrhinoseptoplastylip revision
parent counselingmolding appliancespeech therapypt.counselingdental careorthodontic tx.
Multidisciplinaryteam
Interdisciplinary referralvs.
10
Multidisciplinary team
SurgeonOtologist
Pediatrician
Orthodontist
PedodontistProsthodontist
Rehabilitation Med.Speech therapist
Psychiatrist
11
12
13
14
15
Surgical Goals
• Complete anatomical closure of cleft -palate
• Functioning velopharyngeal mechanism
Criteria for Success
• Normal speech development
• Absence of fistula
• No secondary maxillary growth inhibition
16
17
18
19
20
ConceptConcept•skeletal surgery
•alveolar bone grafting•orthognathic surgery
•rhinoseptoplasty
•revision cheiloplasty
21
22
23
24
ANKYLOSISTMJ Ankylosis
8th weektemporal blastemas
condylar blastemas
9th – 10th wk.ossification
formation of condylar cartilage
12th wk. formation of lower joint compartment
14th wk. formation of upper joint compartment
Embryology
25
26
27
28
Cranio-maxillofacial trauma
29
30
Indications
31
Surgical Approaches
Intraoral
Extraoral
Combined extraoral - intraoral
Fixation Method
32
postcondylar fracture syndrome
mandibular deviation
shortened vertical ramus height
canting of oclussal plane
decreased translation
internal derangement
Assael, l. A. : Hard tissue Trauma. Temporomandibular Disorders: 1990
33
Developmental Anomalies
34
35
Neoplastic disorders
36
Ameloblastoma( benign epithelial odontogenic tumor )
Adamantinoma ( Malassez, 1885 )
Ameloblastoma ( Churchill, 1934 )
Potential epithelial sources:
- enamel organ
- reduced enamel epithelium
- odontogenic rests (rests of Malassez/Serres)
- epithelial lining of dentigerous cysts
37
Histologic Classification
- follicular- plexiform- Acanthomatous- spindle
* unicystic
Treatment Strategies
Radical Surgery( Axhausen )
Conservation Surgery ( Pichler, Trauner )
1. Marsupialization/Enucleation2. Enucleation w/ curettage3. Enucleation w/ peripheral
ostectomy
Primary Reconstruction
38
unicystic ameloblastoma
39
40
“Ameloblastomas exhibit biological heterogeneity andhistological appearances do not always allow their behavior to be predicted.”
Oral Dis. 1999 Apr. 5 (2) : 111-6Ong’uti MN, Howells GL,Williams DM
Oral Diseases Research Center,Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, UK
Ameloblastoman = 35
SOLID Cystic
1995 - 2005
11/35 = 31% 24/35 = 67%
41
Ameloblastoma (solid type)
42
43
Ameloblastoma
44
45
1995 – 2005
N = 24 PatientsCystic Mandibular
Ameloblastoma
Mandibular conservation surgery
46
Conservative treatment
1. Surgical enucleation of cystic ameloblastoma
2. Smoothening of bony septations and loculations
3. Exteriorize bony cavity
4. 4% 5FU cream application into healing bony cavity q 3-4 days x 4weeks.
Ameloblastoma n=24
3/24 = 12% 16/24 = 67%
5/24 = 21%
47
48
25.0%Associated w/ unerupted tooth
49
0
1
2
3
4
5
0-10yrs 11-20yrs. 21-30yrs. 31-40yrs. 41-50yrs.
femalemale
age/sex distributionN=24 patients
Female = 58% Male = 42%
=
=
=
25%
62.5%
12.5%
Distribution of mandibular ameloblastoma in 24 patients
N= 6
N= 15
N= 3
50
Cystic ameloblastoma
51
Cystic ameloblastoma w/intraluminal tumor nodules
52
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10123456789
101112131415161718192021222324
follow-up period
N=24
yrs.
53
Results
(+) bone regeneration
(+) functional rehabilitation
15/24 = 63% w/o residual sensory deficit
4/24 = 17% w/ minimal mandibular asymmetry
6/24 = 25% w/ mild sensory deficit
3/24 = 12% w/ bothersome sensory deficit
2/24 = 8% -pathologic fracture
Treatment period : 6-12 months