UNITEDSTIJ.TES POSTIJ.L SERVICE o Western … _maint... · Western Regional Coordinator, APWU ... =...

60
MANAGER, LABOR RELATIONS PACIFIC AREA d UNITED STIJ.TES POSTIJ.L SERVICE March 8, 2010 Omar Gonzalez Western Regional Coordinator, APWU 500 Airport Blvd. #450 Burlingame, CA 94910 o This is to advise you of the intent of the Sacramento District to utilize the provisions of Article 12.5.C.6 and Article 12.5.C.5 of the National Agreement to involuntarily reassign nine (9) Electronic Technicians, one (1 ) Building Equipment Mechanic, two (2) Maintenance Mechanics, one (1) MPE Mechanic, one (1) Maintenance Support Clerk and eight (8) Laborer Custodials from the Marysville bid cluster. The basis for this action is an approved AMP. The impacted employees will be advised of their involuntary reassignments by separate letter. The final placement date would normally be no sooner than September 9, 2010; however, it may be necessary to effect the placement process earlier than that date based upon the drastic decline in mail volume and the financials of the Postal Service. Specifically, the Postal Service has lost almost 26 billion pieces of mail this past year alone and is not receiving enough revenue to sustain the cost of its processing and delivery network. It may also be necessary to utilize the provisions of Article 7.B.2 of the National Agreement to detail some or all of the impacted employees during the notice period in order to provide them with a work opportunity. By copy of this notice, the Pacific Area will withhold up to 22 full-time residual assignments in the clerk, carrier, mail handler and maintenance crafts in plants and post offices within a 300 mile radius of the impacted site. A copy of the Automated Impact Statement and the AMP package which supports the need to excess are attached along with a copy of the seniority list identifying the junior impacted clerks. I propose that we meet to discuss this matter the week of March 15-19. Please let me know what time and date would be convenient. Od¥:- Mike Thomas Attachments cc: Area Manager, Operations Support Area manager, Finance Area Manager, Human Resources 11255 RANCHO CARMEL DR. RM. 227 SAN DIEGO, CA 92197-4400 PHONE: 858-674-3180 FAX: 858-674-3131

Transcript of UNITEDSTIJ.TES POSTIJ.L SERVICE o Western … _maint... · Western Regional Coordinator, APWU ... =...

MANAGER, LABOR RELATIONS

PACIFIC AREA

d UNITED STIJ.TESPOSTIJ.L SERVICE

March 8, 2010

Omar GonzalezWestern Regional Coordinator, APWU500 Airport Blvd. #450Burlingame, CA 94910

o

This is to advise you of the intent of the Sacramento District to utilize the provisions of Article 12.5.C.6 andArticle 12.5.C.5 of the National Agreement to involuntarily reassign nine (9) Electronic Technicians,one (1 ) Building Equipment Mechanic, two (2) Maintenance Mechanics, one (1) MPE Mechanic, one (1)Maintenance Support Clerk and eight (8) Laborer Custodials from the Marysville bid cluster. The basis forthis action is an approved AMP.

The impacted employees will be advised of their involuntary reassignments by separate letter. The finalplacement date would normally be no sooner than September 9, 2010; however, it may be necessary toeffect the placement process earlier than that date based upon the drastic decline in mail volume and thefinancials of the Postal Service. Specifically, the Postal Service has lost almost 26 billion pieces of mailthis past year alone and is not receiving enough revenue to sustain the cost of its processing and deliverynetwork. It may also be necessary to utilize the provisions of Article 7.B.2 of the National Agreement todetail some or all of the impacted employees during the notice period in order to provide them with a workopportunity.

By copy of this notice, the Pacific Area will withhold up to 22 full-time residual assignments in the clerk,carrier, mail handler and maintenance crafts in plants and post offices within a 300 mile radius of theimpacted site.

A copy of the Automated Impact Statement and the AMP package which supports the need to excess areattached along with a copy of the seniority list identifying the junior impacted clerks. I propose that wemeet to discuss this matter the week of March 15-19. Please let me know what time and date would beconvenient.

Od¥:-Mike Thomas

Attachments

cc: Area Manager, Operations SupportArea manager, FinanceArea Manager, Human Resources

11255 RANCHO CARMEL DR. RM. 227

SAN DIEGO, CA 92197-4400

PHONE: 858-674-3180

FAX: 858-674-3131

WorkHour Impact Report

Impacted Bid Cluster

Installation Address

Area Name

Impact Type

Date of Impact

Period (Dates) of Review Performed

Report Prepared By

Report Prepared Date

Reviewed By

Phone

MARYSVILLE POST OFFICE

PACIFIC

Reduction Other Than by Attrition

09/13/2010

01/17/2009 thru 01/15/2010

Brandi Jentgen

03/07/2010

Rosemarie Fernandez

(415) 550-5591

WorkHour Impact ReportCraft = MAINTENANCE

A B C D E F GCurrent Planned Weekly Hrs Monthly Annual Annual FTE CurrentAverage Weekly Savings Savings Work Hours Savings FTE Yearly

Weekly Hrs Hrs Savings Hr Rate

Total 846 65 -781 -3124 -40612 -22 1820

OverTime Impact

Current OT Current Planned OT Additional Percent Planned OT Planned OTAverage OT Rate per Week Planned OT Planned OT Hours per Rate

Weekly Hrs from changes per Week per Week Week

Total 0 0% 0 0 0 0%

WorkHour Impact ReportCasuals

a. Current Number of MAINTENANCE Casuals on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MAINTENANCE Casuals Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MAINTENANCE Casuals Hours per Month

d. Number of MAINTENANCE Casuals that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MAINTENANCE Casuals that will be Terminated

f. Number of MAINTENANCE Casuals Remaining After Impact

g. Provide Narrative Justifying need for Remaining MAINTENANCE Casuals

There are no casuals in the maintenance craft in this office.

Part Time Flexible (PTFs)

a. Current Number of MAINTENANCE PTFs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MAINTENANCE PTFs Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MAINTENANCE PTFs Hours per Month

d. Number of MAINTENANCE PTFs that will have Reduced Hours

e. Will there be any MAINTENANCE PTFs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MAINTENANCE PTFs

f. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

There are no PTF's in the maintenance craft

Transitional Employees (TEs)

a. Current Number of MAINTENANCE TEs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MAINTENANCE TE Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MAINTENANCE TE Hours per Month

d. Number of MAINTENANCE TEs that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MAINTENANCE TEs that will be Terminated

f. Number of MAINTENANCE TEs Remaining After Impact

g. Provide Narrative Justifying need for Remaining MAINTENANCE TEs

TE's are not authorized in the maintenance craft

oooooo

oooo

NO

o

oooooo

WorkHour Impact Report

Part Time Regular (PTRs)

a. Current Number of MAINTENANCE PTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MAINTENANCE PTR Positions after Impact

c. Estimated Number of MAINTENANCE PTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MAINTENANCE PTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

MAINTENANCE PTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

There are no PTR's in this offoce

Full Time Regular (FTRs)

a. Current Number of MAINTENANCE FTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MAINTENANCE FTR Positions After Impact

c. Estimated Number of MAINTENANCE FTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MAINTENANCE FTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MAINTENANCE FTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

The Marysville AMP will result in the need to excess up to 22 full-time maintenance craftemployees

a

aa

NO

a

24

2

oYES

22

WorkHour Impact Report-MAINTENANCE

Preliminary Summary

a. Total Planned Non-OT Reduction per Month for Regulars and PTRs

b. Planned Reduction in Total OT Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Casual Non-OT Hours per Month

d. Planned Reduction in PTF Non-OT Hours per Month

e. Planned Reduction in TE Non-OT Hours per Month

e. Total Planned Non-OT Hours per Month

f. Total FTE Savings

-3124

oooo

260

-22

._----..',-------_._--

-------

T~ of Distribution to C<lmcfid$: -"Q!!i....' r-;&....Dett;;.;;.;;..::- _

Gaining Facility Name and Type:.~ CA P&DC,,_Street Addtua: 3175 ItldUstriaI BMj

CiIy:Wect~Itattt:~

FllCUity ZJP COde: 95790------'Inat1C9 NumbM: 0l'i6619

Cumnt SO zrp Code(a): 9042,;,:;:.:..;,966-958:;.,;;;.;...;.;;;:.:.'~ " _

.!

t5iiift

\i--l.."\-"cA6*it

--$ldl\ . t....J .. 0'I'Qi

t )-'Z.~--'-"Baiii"""""-

._-,--_.--~~_.

Senior PfantMan~:

C*trtctMa~~- {)i!ien't@t ~e (::at;;jbrfi.$~F.eff l;;'lft.tJee.z

-..------- ~ Riftill .,--- ..-

~eAWJ:(;

Pottmu.t Of PlantMa~___ :.'~ey ,!\<;;l~NMl;j .. ".~.,~,_

s.nior PlantMM~

~rrl

Plant Manager:

~.........~~-------------------~;

Type of Distribution to Consolidate: iFaCili~t~:;;~:d:~~:;!

City:!State:!

5D Facility ZIP Code:,District:!

Area:;Finance Number: i

Current 3D ZIP Code(s)::Miles to Gaining Facility: :

EXFC office::Plant Manager: !

Senior Plant Manager: IDistrict Manager: I

Facility Type after AMP:;

Orig & DestMarysville CA P&DF5050 Arboga RoadMarysvilleCA95901SacramentoPacific05479595940.4YesJoe FoleyWilliam D. HodsonRosemarie Calabrese-FernandezCLOSED

MODS/BPI Office

Jul-01-2008 : Jun-30-2009

Date & Time this workbook was last saved:

Facility Name & Type:: Sacramento CA P&DCI

Street Address:' 3775 Industrial BlvdCity:! West Sacramento

State:! CA5D Facility ZIP Code: i 95799

District: i SacramentoArea:! Pacific

Finance Number:, 056679I

Current 3D ZIP Code(s):: 942, 956-958EXFC office:! Yes

Plant Manager:! (This Space intentionally Left Blank)Senior Plant Manager: I William D. Hodson

District Manager: i Rosemarie Calabrese-Fernandez

Start of Study:: 09/10/09Date Range of Data:

Processing Days per Year: 310Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750

EAS Hours per Year: 1,825Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/ New

Facility Start-up Costs Update 1- M_aY_2_7_,2_0_0_9 ---1

2/16/20108:58

Area Vice President:! Drew T. AlipertoSenior Vice President, Operations:! Steven J. Forte

Area AMP Coordinator: I Steve MummyHQ AMP Coordinator: i Roland Smith/Barbara Brewington

Package Page 1 AMP Data Entry Page

Miles to Gaining Facility: 40.4

Executive SummaryLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility Name and Type: Marysville CA P&DF

Street Address: 5050 Arboga Road

City, State: Marysville, CA

Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 959

Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Orig & Dest

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Sacramento CA P&DC

Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 942,956-958

$5,098,529

Savings/CostsMail Processing Craft Workhour Savings = $3,366,526 from Workhour Costs - Proposed

Non-MP CrafVEAS + Shared LDCs Workhour Savings (less Mainifrrans) = $202,611 from Other Curr vs Prop

PCES/EAS Supervisory Workhour Savings = $507,127 from Other Curr vs Prop

Transportation Savings = ($499,683) from Transportation (HCR and PVS)

Maintenance Savings = $1,521,949 from Maintenance

Space Savings = $0 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs---_-:..:-Total Annual Savings =

Total One-Time Costs = $479,070 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

$4,619,459Total First Year Savings =========Staffing Positions

from Staffing - Craft55Craft Position Loss =---=-=---

from Staffing - PCESIEAS5PCES/EAS Position Loss =----'----Volume

Total FHP to be Transferred (Average Daily Volume) = 796,886 from Worl<hour Costs - Current

Current FHP at Gaining Facility (Average Daily Volume) = 4,886,558 from Workhour Costs - Current

Losing Facility Cancellation Volume (Average Daily Volume) = 141,433 (= Total TPH I Operating Days)

Service

Service Standard ImpactsbyADV

First-Class Mail®Priority Mail®

Package Services

Periodicals

Standard MailCode to destmatlon 3-digft ZiP Code volume IS not

availarJle

ADV8,615

393

111

ADV ADV4,696,350

60,008

%

Package Page 3 AMP Executive Summary

Summary NarrativeLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility Name and Type: Marysville CA P&DFCurrent 3D ZIP Code(s): 959

Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Orig & Dest

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Sacramento CA P&DCCurrent 3D ZIP Code(s): 942,956-958

Background:The Sacramento Performance Cluster, with assistance from the Pacific Area office, has completed an AreaMail Processing (AMP) study to determine the feasibility of relocating the Marysville P&DF outgoing andincoming letter, flat, Express, Priority, packages, and Registry mail volumes for processing at theSacramento, CA P&DC. The proposal encompasses mail processing for all ZIPs in SCF 959.

Currently, the Marysville P&DF is an owned facility that processes all outgoing and incoming mail in the959 ZIP range. Outgoing mail is processed Monday through Friday at the Marysville P&DF and isprocessed at the Sacramento P&DC on Saturdays. Incoming mail is processed at the Marysville P&DFMonday through Saturday. With the approved AMP Marysville's outgoing and incoming mail processing willtransfer to the Sacramento P&DC. The Marysville facility is approximately 40.4 miles from the SacramentoP&DC.

Financial Summary:Annual baseline data came from July 1, 2008 - June 30, 2009. Financial savings proposed for thisconsolidation of originating operations are:

Total First Year SavingsTotal Annual Savings

$ 4,619,459$ 5,098,529

The total FHP (average daily volume) to be transferred to Sacramento is 796,886 pieces.

Customer Service Considerations:No adverse service impacts for First Class Mail (FCM) are anticipated for Marysville customers as a resultof this AMP.

The originating 2-day service commitment for FCM to San Francisco CA (940-941,943-944) and OaklandCA (945-948) would be upgraded to overnight. Sacramento will adjust their operating plan to supportcurrent Marysville service standards.

National Distribution and Labeling list changes will be submitted as appropriate for lists L002, L005, L201and L607.

Transportation Changes:The total transportation impacts for the proposed AMP adds an additional $499,683 in transportation toensure the maximum operating plan availability is preserved to process, distribute and deliver mail for alloriginating and destinating volumes between the Sacramento P&DC and all 959 offices. The following tripnumbers are proposed to be eliminated: 95910,95913,95941 and 94014

The following 959 trip numbers are moved to the Sacramento P&DC and mileage updated:

95930,95934,95935,95936,95937,95938,95939, 95947, 95948, 95981, 959A3 and 959LO.

The following trips have had mileage updated: 94690, 94896 and 948CK

Package Page 4 AMP Summary Narrative

Summary Narrative (continued)Summary Narrative Page 2

Staffing Impacts:Current projections from the AMP study indicate a net reduction of 55 craft employees with Marysvillelosing 124 and Sacramento gaining 69 positions. The net reduction of 1 EAS employee shown below is aresult of bringing the EAS employees in Sacramento up to authorized staffing. As a direct result of theAMP there is a decrease of 7 EAS positions at Marysville and an increase of 2 SDO positions atSacramento. The Postal Service ensures that its standard practices comply with the Worker Adjustmentand Retraining Notification (WARN) Act.

The proposal estimates Mail Processing Craft Workhour Savings in the amount of $3,366,526 andPCES/EAS Supervisory Workhour Savings in the amount of $507,127.

The staffing impacts and management to craft ratios are summarized below.

SOOs to Craft 1

(1 :25 target)

1 : 321 : 27

1 Craft = FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals

2 Craft = F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining

(1:22 target)

1: 24

1 : 23 1: 27 1 : 23

Equipment Relocation and Maintenance Impacts:Originating letter mail is cancelled in Marysville on two (2) advanced facer canceller systems (AFCS) withan average daily volume of 141,433 pieces. Both of these AFCSs will be excessed. In addition four (4)DBCS, two (2) DBCS-OSS, and two (2) DIOSS machines, as well as one (1) AFSM, will be relocated toSacramento P&DC to support 959 destinating operations.

Space Impacts:The total interior footage of the Marysville P&DC is 65,333 sq. ft. With the approved AMP, the expectedgain of 65,333 sq. ft. is proposed to be utilized for a future use or the facility sold.

Other Concurrent Initiatives:Marysville P&DF and Sacramento P&DC completed tour compressions prior to the AMP process.Sacramento P&DC also completed a tour compression, a significant facility expansion and absorbedoperations and positions from both the Stryker Surface Transfer Center (STC) as well as destinatingoperations from the Royal Oak DDC.

Package Page 5 AMP Summary Narrative

24 Hour ClockLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility Name and Type: Marysville CA P&DFCurrent 3D ZIP Code(s): 959

Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Orig & Dest

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Sacramento CA P&DCCurrent 3D ZIP Code(s): 942,956-958

24 Hour Indicator Re ort 80% 100% 100% 100{}/¢ Millions 100{\/o 100% 86<9%

~~0

W 0 OWa: a: a: a: 8i5 ow

g~go go 00

1ii~g;::E",w "w ~w ~w ,;:

~i:Ni: Ni: Ni: ~i: !Ii:

~~~D ~fi: ~o "0

f>0 "w "w J"o ~w"w !i , c w ow!i '

., ., u'~ 8j e j ~ ~ ~ 0'

~ ~u. ~ ~ <3 ~ ~ ~., (.) g (.) 0 Q. 0 "';Co Q.W ww Q.w 0& "w 0$~w(.) ~ 8~ 8! ~~ > ~ Cll [ro

~ ~8N~ cli;0 0 woQ. l-o

::E 0

Package Page 6 AMP 24 Hour Clock

Losing Facility Name and Type: Marysville CA P&DFCurrent 3D ZIP Cadets): 959

Miles ta Gaining Facility: 40.4

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Sacramento CA P&DCCurrent 3D ZIP Cadets): 942, 956-958

MAPlast Saved February 16, 2010

Package Page 7 AMP MAP

Service Standard ImpactsLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF

L~ing~cil~3D~PC~e~):~9~5~9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gaining Facili~3DZIPCode(s):~9~4=2,~9~5~6~-9~5~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

__ ._. _.__ _ _ 2/9/2010Based on report prepared by Network IntF!gration SII!"\!"\ort clatF!cl'-------

FCM PRI PER' STD' PSVC ALL CLASSES

Overnight % Change All Others % Change Total % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change

UPGRADE 8,615 0.6% 0 0.0% 8,615 0.2% 393 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 111 0.4% 9,119 0.2%

DOWNGRADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

TOTAL 17,230 0.6% 0 0.0% 17,230 0.2% 393 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 111 0.4% 17,734 0.2%

NET UP+NO CHNG 1,513,231 0.6% 3,183,119 0.0% 4,696,350 0.2% 60,008 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 25,421 0.4% 4,781,779 0.2%

VOLUME TOTAL 1,513,231 3,183,119 4,696,350 60,008 25,421 4,781,779

• - Periodical and Standard ma~_~i.9in 3-E.!.9.it ZIP C<,>de to destination 3-digit ~JP Code volume is not available _[ Selected summary fields are transferred to the Executive Summary---_._-'_.~-~._--_.~_._-_..__. ----,.~._._~--, " , ' ---'--~--'-'----."'---

FCM PRI PER STD PSVC ALL CLASSES

Overnight % Change All Others % Change Total % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change

UPGRADE 13 10.6% 0 0.0% 13 0.1% 56 0.6% 794 8.6% 922 10.0% 8 0.1% 1,793 3.9%

DOWNGRADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 0.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 0.0%

TOTAL 13 10.6% 0 0.0% 13 0.1% 56 0.6% 798 8.7% 925 10.0% 8 0.1% 1,800 3.9%

NET 13 10.6% 0 0.0% 13 0.1% 56 0.6% 790 8.6% 919 10.0% 8 0.1% 1,786 3.9%

Notes:

Package Page 8 AMP Service Standard Impacts

Stakeholders NotificationLast Saved: February 16, 2010(WorkBook Tab Notification - 1)

Losing Facility:fI!I.a.rysvi~~~~F.'l!<.I2~._~.__.._..._ ._ ... .__ ._•..._._____._...

Stakeholder Notification Page 1

AMP Event: _~!?-'!_<?'!'§.!':I.~Y~_._._._ .....

Newsbreak

Newsbreak ."felt

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

APWU/NPMHU Presidents--_._------_._---~----,--

1-tl",,(1

.~~sid~':lL":'Iarys\dl!~.!:.~I~!'~l:!.'Ie;

President APWU Local 66

President Local 302, NPMHU

President Sacramento Br NPMHU_._---- ------~.~

President YFRB· NAPS-~.,_.---->~-----~---~~._-----~._.-

President, NAPUS

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

)'1':"

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

Honorable Da~e(·t::lct Pers'.'/;'j

Honorable Sam Aanestad_._.--.._---------------,-_._--------_._-_._.---,-,_..r·' )"';I",f ;...., - ~/l

Honorable Wally Hergerr,I';

Honorable Barbara Boxer(/'L);~[ F·e··,-

!:ion~~b~.QianeFeins~int'~!;,j r,,':"C'

Honorable Bill Harris

California StateAssem~ _tT.ti,,? ':;fiIC2[

House of Representatives,Ttl;'" ffi,,-

United States Senate'ii'L"

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

Press Release IGus Ruiz

Package Page 9

!~a!ysville Area Newsdesk- F,r~\ ~"" ... t,[ : ,'r-

Gus Ruiz Pho.l1<1.I.nteJ'.'1ew re M~ry~v~I~.f'.~1:)i(jt,':p_'r ['.:3',';(·

09/18/2009

09/21/2009

AMP Stakeholders Notification

Stakeholders Notification (continued)(WorkBook Tab Notification - 1)

Losin9 Facility: _~~ry~\ll~~U:~,6._~~E._. .___________. . _Stakeholder Notification Page 2

AMP Event: Start of..__C:.:.c:: ..:_.,_c..=..:=.=." __ ._... _._ .

STEVE WATSON- ~~,- -_.---_._-~--_.

"I',t;-,cr r~'OC ,.....,

MARK WILLIAMS

JENNIFER OKRAY.__.."--"--""._"-~"_ ..__..----._. ---------_.--_.__•..-

JEFFREY RICE

CLARK BUSCHMANN

AMENDA SANBORN·STOUT>~--_._-_.._-_._-_._.__.-..'-_'_---._--------

"-il

BARBARA KENNEY_·_"...·_._H"_.__. . ·__._~ __. .H . ~_.__·.·__".:, ...,-

CAROLYN FAUBEL__________~ .. ~H_.__•__ ,

)1 ;-\-.

TIFFANI HERYFORD__~~H_~~ ~ ~~_~~ ~_

FRED PERKINS

Package Page 10

13TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIP• HH_~ " _

A WOMANS FRIEND CRISIS PREGNANCY

ALLSTATE INSURANCE

ALSAC - ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCI_______._. •__H • ._H••__H _

ALTA CALIFORNIA CHAPTER TROA

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY~------_._----~-------_.--'_'_--"---

APPEAL DEMOCRAT_~_". .H_.__.__· •.__. .._

BALD MOUNTAIN NURSERY

BUSCHMANN COMMUNICATIONS

BUSINESS FULFILLMENT SERVICES_________.~ .H. >_ ••_·_.· __,·. ·.·_.

;)]":.(.'--; r\ ~<_ci-'

BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE-----------~--~._-

CA RETIRED TEACHERS ASSN DIVISION--"~--_._-"----_._-._-_..__._-_._....., ..•._--,,...-.~-,

r ,'~

CENTRAL SACRAMENTO VALLEY SHRINE

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

CHILO SUPPORT SERVICE-_.__._-_._-.._...~-_._ .._-"..._._~---~-~-----_._--

.9HURfi::' OF J§§.US CHRIST OF LOS'T-;,:,;< !\c

COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS-YUBA CITY C--~------ . .._-._--

CORINTHIAN LODGE 9 F & AM

COUNTRY VET CLINIC

CREATIVE INTERIORS~:'r~T3'ri r\:·?,·-,,-

CROSSROADS COMMUNITY CHURCH-- _.._--_..__._._....__..._-_.~ ..- ---..~.. -~._-~ .._..-~....---_.~- ...__._-

DIGITAL DIRECT INC

g.!~<;;QlJ~IMAJ_~..§_~\IlC..s..J.."'.g.:. ..< "'''' f-·,;.'·"

DOMINO'S PIZZA------~---------------_._..__...._---

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009----~----_.-._--_.

09/17/2009

09/17/2009------ ----_.__..._._-~ ...---------

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

j'r:.

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009Dare

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009 .

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009"8

09/17/2009------.----~_._----~-

AMP Stakeholders Notification

Stakeholders Notification (continued)(WorkBook Tab Notification - 1)

Losing Facility:M_a_ry~_v.~!~__g_A~§<I:>.E._ ....._.. . .__. _Stakeholder Notification Page 3

AMP Event: __Start ~!_~.l:l91'. _

VICTORIA

JOAN EVERETT _, ·'-tEC·f r--,:::"~";""

ROY KYONO

LARRY DOLLINS

~~~NY KANG-;,;'i:'J::-l Pt"Z-

VIC, ED, OR CHUCK

ANGIE OR DIANE

KATHY DICKINSON

CHERYL BRANDWOOD------_._-_._------_.._._---------._...._....

MARY THOMPSON

SUSAN BAR.:.:.N:.:EooS'-- _,-,)nt::;c( Pf:rSC;]t

CHAD MILLER

JOHN FONTES-_._----

KAREN

Package Page 11

EMMANUEL FAITH TABERNACLE

ERNIE'S MOBILE HOME TRANSPORT

FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCORPORA1

FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH

FREMONT RIDEOUT HEALTH GROUP

GOLD COUNTRY NATIONAL BANK

JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE-------------------

LAKEVIEW PERROLEUM COMPANY

LANDMARK MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHUR'

LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT~---_._-,,-------------------~-----------------_.

LOUIS F. PUTMAN AUCTIONEERING

MARYSVILLE BUDDIST CHURCH

MARYSVILLE HOLIDAY MARKET----_._--------

MARYSVILLE LODGE 783 BPO ELKS

MIDDLE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION.__._-----.-~----------

PIP PRINTING

PLACER-NEVADA COUNTY MED SOCIEn--------~--_._---------------

RIDEOUT HOSPITAL

SAINT JOSEPHS PARISH---------------------------------_._~---

SCI CONSULTING GROUP

SMART MARKETING

SONS IN RETIREMENT TWIN RIVERS BR .-_._------------>------_.

SUTTER NORTH MED.

SUTTER NORTH MEDICAL FOUNDATION

THE COUNTRY FLORIST

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/1712009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/1712009

09/17/2009-_._-----~-~--

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/1712009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

.:;:0.::9:...:/1""7:.:/2:.:0.::0.::9 . _[)ale

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

09/17/2009

AMP Stakeholders Notification

(WorkBook Tab Notification - 1)

Losing Facility:

Stakeholders Notification (continued)Stakeholder Notification Page 4

AMP Event: Start of

Package Page 12 AMP Stakeholders Notification

Stakeholders Notificationlast Saved: February 16, 2010 Stakeholder Notification Page 1

AMP Event: ..!,~.~li~.~eEl~l1fL

.~E!E!t~n~I:>~!!= i 12116/2009~-:-:--:-,,:,,:-------i

Meeting Time: 1 6:30 - 8:30 pm

Newsbreak 12101/2009

12101/2009

APWU/NPMHU Presidents"II~r

Pre~!.Ci~~t..'-'1~rysvJlI~.I:.~I_~Y',tl,J., "'i,~11

President local 302. NPMHU

President Sacramento Br NPMHU

President YFRB- NAPS

Westem Region Vice President NAPS

President, NAPUS

12101/2009C:::]/,

12101/2009

12101/2009--------~~~,--,-,~~~---

12101/2009

12101/2009

12101/2009

l::l9norab~l2~l~_. .._. _\!;{3:~t p(,r,:~:-j

Honorable Sam Aanestad_.~ ,,, ,_. . ._u ,_.__,.,,,_._. , __

Ho.norable Wally Herger"'-1 Fr,,,

Honorable Barbara Boxer

Honorable Diane Feinstein_._~__u > • ~ ~__~_. • _

Honorable Bill Harris

California State AssemEll _

House of Representatives

United States Senate

United States Senate~---_.__._---~_._._---~----_.- ------_._-_._._----_..

12101/2009

12101/2009

12101/2009

12101/2009

PressRelease IGus RuizCli!;.y1 p.""

Package Page 13

Marysville Area Newsdesk

g.lJ.~~uJ.~hon~.!f1~~~~,,!,re Mary!.viI~~-"'-~C<J-f'-'CS";j i";,:<nl1;

12101/2009~, ...~ , i'

12/01/2009

AMP Stakeholders Notification

Stakeholders Notification (continued)(WorkBook Tab Notification - 2)

Losing Faci1ity:~Cl_I}'~ill~<:;f\f'll<[)E_ __ __ ~___ .Stakeholder Notification Page 2

AMP Event: ._f'~~I~c.!:'1~_E:ltinl:L

12101/2009

Package Page 14 AMP Stakeholders Notification

Losing Facility:

Date Range of Data:

Marysville CA P&DF

07/01108 «===,===» 06/30/09.

Workhour Costs· Current

Last Saved: February 16, 2010

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DC

, . . , . •Function 1

U>CFunction 4,

1 $40,05 41 $0,00

2 $41.03 42 $0.00

3 $44.66 43 $0,00

4 $36.44 44 $0.00

5 $34.38 45 $132.48

6 $0.00 46 $0,00

7 $37.19 47 $0.00

8 $41.93 48 $36.97~,-,----

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)Current

% Moved toCurrent Current Current Current Current

Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers

GainingVolume NATPH Volume Workhours ITPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

010 100,0% $85,133

,--Jl..~L- 100,0% $7,906013 100,0% $35,613015 100,0% $73,933016 100,0% $12,427

100,0% $87,178100,0% $33,534100,0% $130100,0% $0100,0% $155,707100,0% $259,857100,0% $13,675100,0% $127,115100,0% $3,658

'iOO,O% $160,382100,0% $77

'100,0% $1,934067 100,0% $4,016

100.0% $55100,0% $66,501100,0% $14,506100.0% $9,195100.0% $253,748100,0% $5,238100,0% $204,401

180 100,0% $255,336100.0% $165,688100,0% $25,662100,0% $184,527100,0% $15,198100.0% $7,872100,0% $687,653100,0% $319,503

232 100,0% $54,833100.0% $2,306100,O',{

,_. $332100,0% $49,482100,0% $2,708100,0% $89,079100,0% $82.951

Package Page 15

unction 1U>C

11 $40.63 41 $0,00

12 $44,07 42 $0.00

13 $35,01 43 $33,36

14 $41.59 44 $0,00

15 $35.07 45 $0,00

16 $0,00 46 $0,00

17 $39.10 47 $0,00

18 $40.18 48 $0,00

(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)Current

°/0 Moved toCurrent Current Current Current Current

OperationLosing

Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours ITPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

010 $132,093012 $18,340013 $0015 $590,145141 $415,033017 $218,940020 $168,041021 $235022 $0030 $1,261,081035 $427,668040 $304,858

~44 $1,413,757050 $850,986055 $171,316060 $258066 $0067 $0070 $3,901074 $296,594110 $182,166136 $5,745137 $137138 $0139 $28,948180 $4,289,077185 $287,944208 $485,259

: 210 $3,846,987> 212 $1,023,963, 229 $3,743,227> 230 $1,544,162, 231 $1,428,955, 232 $447,452, 233 .......~~~, 264 $0: 271 $353,g~, 274 $0, 281 $809.526, 141duD

AMP Workhour Costs· Current

$0$0$0

(14)CurrentAnnual

Workhour Costs

(13)Current

Productivity(TPH or NATPH

(12)CurrentAnnual

Workhours

(11)Current

Annual TPH orNATPH Volume

(10)Current

Annual FHPVolume

(9)

% Moved toLosing

(S)

CurrentOperationNumbers

"'~¢~

"'~~~~~

"'~"'~¢~

~~~ 554

"'~~~~~~ 607

~ -JI.fl.~~~~~~¢ 816~I~~~¢~

¢~~ 898

¢~ - - $98,139~ 892 $1,332,051~ 894

¢ 896dup $7,770,362~ 918 $43,249¢ 919 ~~~ ~~c~ 961~ 964~ ~~.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (S) (6) (7)Current

YClMowdtoCurrent Current Current Current Current

()peAtion AnnU41 FHP Annwd TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers

GainingVolume NATPH Volume Workhours rTPH or NATPH\ Workhour Costs

334 100.0% $511,388336 100.0% $456,748340 100.0% $1,778441 100.0% $0442 100.0% $0444 100.0% $693468 100.0% $0491 100.0% $825549 100.0% $15,795554 100.0% $74268560 100.0% $101.397561 100.0% $120785585 100.0% $144,698607 100.0% $16,663776 100.0% $1,822811 100.0% $66812 100.0% $0814 100.0% $25,115816 100.0% $76,374834 100.0% $685871 100.0% $320874 100.0% $11,271876 100.0% $925878 100.0% $34,698891 100.0% $22,975892 100.0% $8894 100.0% $429,338896 100.0% $921918 100.0% $1,002,516919 100.0% $320,949961 100.0% $48,168964 100.0% $1,626971 100.0% $176

Package Page 16 AMP Workhour Costs - Current

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)Current

0/. Moved toCurrent Current Current Current Current

Openttlon Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Gaining

Volume NATPH Volume Workhours (TPH or NATPH) Wor1<hour Costs

"

Package Page 17 AMP Workhour Costs - Current

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)Current

% Moved 10Cumonl CUfl'ent Current Current Current

OperationGaining

Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productlvlty AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours ITPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

Package Page 18 AMP Workhour Costs - Current

(1)Current

OperationNumbers

(2)

tl/o Moved toGaining

(3)Current

Annual FHPVolume

(4)Current

Annual TPH orNATPH Volume

(5)

CurrentAnnual

Workhours

(6)Current

ProductivitytTPH or NATPH)

(7)CurrentAnnual

Workhour Cos

(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)Current

% Moved toCurrent Current Current Current Current

Operation losing Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours (TPH or NATPH) Workhour Costs

I

1---,"1 1 1 I 1 I I

I

I

I--~ 1 1 I 1 I I I

t--- I I I I I I I

Package Page 19 AMP Workhour Costs - Current

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)Current

% Moved to Current Current Current Current CurrentOperation

Gaining Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours (TPH or NATPH) Workhour Costs

247034,670 682,606295 177 520 3,845 $6,982,0390 0 0 No Calc $0

Totals 171520 3.8-45 $6982,0390 01 0 No Calc $0

682,606,2951 177 520 38451 $6982039 I

(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)

Current% Moved to

Current Current Current Current CurrentOperation

LosingAnnual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity Annual

Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours (TPH or NATPH) Workhour Costs

1 031 424500 2444 783147 963,189 2538 $385808120 0 0 No Calc $0

Totals1.031;424.500 2444783141 963189 2538 $38580812

0 0 0 No Calc $0483,408,557 859,055,225 535,610 1,604 $21,079 056

1 514,833,057 3303838372 1,498799 2204 $59659868

Total FHP to be Transferred (Average Daily Volume) : 796,886(This number is carried forward to AMP Worksheet Executive Summary)

Current FHP at Gaining Facility (Average Dally Volume) : 4,886,558(This number is carried forward to AMP Worksheet Executive Summary)

Combined Current Workhour Annual Workhour Costs : $66,641,907(This number is carried forward to the bottom of AMP Worksheet Workhour Costs-Proposed)

1,278,459,170o

1,218,459,110o

483,408,5571,761,867,727

3,127,389,442o

3,127,389,442o

859,055,2253,986,444,667

1,140,708o

1.140,1no

535,6101,676,318

2,742No Calc

2.742No Calc

1,6042,378

$45,562,851$0

$45,562,851$0

$21,079,056$66,641,907

Package Page 20 AMP Workhour Costs - Current

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF

Workhour Costs - ProposedLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DC

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours (TPH or NATPH) Workhour Costs

010 0 0 0 No Calc $0012 0 0 0 No Calc $0013 a a a No Calc $0015 a a a No Calc $0

a a a No Calc $0a a a No Calc $0a a 0 No Calc $0a a a No Calc $0a a 0 No Calc $0a a a No Calc $0a a 0 No Calc $0a a a No Calc $0a a a No Calc $0a a a No Calc $0

055 0 a a No Calc $0060 0 a a No Calc $0066 0 a a No Calc $0067 0 0 a No Calc $0070

~

0 No Calc $0a a~ 0 a a No Calc $0

110 a a a No Calc $0a 0 a No Calc $00 0 a No Calc $00 a a No Calc $00 a a No Calc $0a 0 a No Calc $00 a a No Calc $0

208 0 a a No Calc $0210 0 a a No Calc $0212 0 a a No Calc $0229 a 0 0 No Calc $0230 0 0 0 No Calc $0231 0 0 0 No Calc $0232 0 0 0 No Calc $0233 0 0 0 No Calc $0264 0 0 0 No Calc $0271 0 0 0 No Calc $0274 0 a a No Calc $0

0 a a No Calc $00 0 0 No Calc $00 0 0 No Calc $00 0 a No Calc $0a 0 a No Calc $00 0 a No Calc $0

442 0 0 0 No Calc $00 0 0 No Calc $00 0 0 No Calc $00 0 0 No Calc $00 0 0 No Calc $0

Package Page 21

(7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours I (TPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

010 $221,598012 $26,652

013 $37,442015 $645,009141 $468,068017 $310,596020 $203,298021 $371022 $0030 ~1 "'~" "'0

035 $485,803040 $307,307044 $1,54~d2_:l.

050 $853,191055 $254,365060 $258066 $468067 $461070 $3,901074 $312,314110 $182,166136 $12,953137 $199,054138 $4,106139 $189,182180 $4,~5J"..51Z-185 $409,353208 $512,239210 $4,015,300212 $1,037,825229 $3,751,504230 $2,035,886231 $1,720,384232 $474,989233 $503,429264 $337271 $403,278274 $2,747281 ~~~3_~22!l-

141duD $0334 $388,627

336 $490,633

_~40 $0141duD $0

142 $12,389144 $913,925468 $0491 _~:'I!l.i549 $35,366

AMP Workhour Costs· Proposed

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours ITPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

554 0 0 0 No Calc $0560 0 0 0 No Calc $0561 0 0 0 No Calc $0585 0 0 0 No Calc $0607 0 0 0 No Calc $0776 0 0 0 No Calc $0811 0 0 0 No Calc $0812 0 0 0 No Calc $0814 0 0 0 No Calc $0816 0 0 0 No Calc $0834 0 0 0 No Calc $0871 0 0 0 No Calc $0874 0 0 0 No Calc $0876 0 0 0 No Calc $0878 0 0 0 No Calc $0891 0 0 0 No Calc $0892 0 0 0 No Calc $0894 0 0 0 No Calc $0896 0 0 0 No Calc $0918 0 0 0 No Calc $0919 0 0 0 No Calc $0961 0 0 0 No Calc $0964 0 0 0 No Calc $0971 0 0 0 No Calc $0

0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc

Package Page 22

(7)

ProposedOperationNumbers

554560561585607776811812814816

264du891884896898

891du892894

896du918919961964

(8)

ProposedAnnual FHP

Volume

(9)

ProposedAnnual TPH orNATPH Volume

(10)ProposedAnnual

Workhours

(12)Proposed

AnnualWorkhour C05ts

$706,289$250,416

$80,357$694,917$381,117

$31,979$49,932

$8,066$12,993$68,261

$0$872,319

$0$210,889

$195$0

$98,147$1,601,062

$0$8,456,038

$368,834$54,322$55,064

AMP Workhour Costs - Proposed

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperatlon Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Worl<hours /TPH or NATPHI Worl<hour Costs

0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc

Package Page 23 AMP Workhour Costs - Proposed

(l) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours fTPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc

Package Page 24 AMP Workhour Costs· Proposed

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Prop()$ed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours fTPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 NeCale0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc

f---~,0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc

Package Page 25

(7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours (TPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

"

AMP Workhour Costs - Proposed

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours . ITPH or NATPH\ Workhour Costs

0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 NoCatc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Catc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc0 No Calc

0 0 0 NoCale $00 0 0 NoCale $00 0 () NoCale $00 0 0 No Cale SO

01 01 01 NoCatel $01

Package Page 26

(7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours (TPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs

1 278,459 170 3,127,389442 1,089,262 2,871 $43,655,1610 0 0 NoCale $0

1,278,459,170 3,127.~89442 1,()8$,~2 2,871 $>43.6$$,1610 0 0 NoCale $0

483,408,667 859,055,225 495,683 1,733 $19671 3191,761,867,727 3,986444,667 1,584944 2,515 $63,326,471

AMP Workhour Costs - Proposed

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours ITPH or NATPH\ Workhour Costs

(7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedOperation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity AnnualNumbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours ITPH or NATPH) Workhour Costs

($821)

$461,081016060141 $22,919248 $91,232331 ($11724)

381 ($203)

441 \$385, \64)

442 ($103486)

444 ($43810)

445 ($743,398}

446 ($10269'1

450 f$114851';

468 $0481 ($203)

505 {$81

814 $43,810815 $743,398818 $0834 1:>204)836 [$488)

846 ($17

871 ($41)

874 ($20844)

875 1$284\

876 1$244)

878 1$32,871)

885 ($81)

894 $73,097915 ($366)

Totals o o o No Calc $0 Totals o o o No Calc ($51,089)

Combined Current Annual Workhour Cost: $66.641.907(ThIS number brought forward from WorlJJour Costs - Current)

Proposed Annual Workhour Cost: $63,275.382(Total of Columns 6 and 12 on this page)

Minimum Function 1 Workhour Savings: ($132,516)(ThiS number represents proposed worl<hour savings with no productivity improvement,

applied to operations at the gaining facility)

Function 1 Workhour Savings: $3,366,526(This number equals the difference in the current and proposed workhour cosh

above and is carried forward to the Executive Summary)

Package Page 27 AMP Workhour Costs - Proposed

I Other Workhour Move Analysis ILast saved: February 16, 2010

lOSing Facility Marysville CA P&DF Gaining Facility Sacramento CA P&DC Date Range of Data: 07/01/08 to .,,06"'1.,,3"'0/.,,09"- _

579<>73<>16745747750

$11304$55.437

$0$999,049

$5,169,054$10,045,922

Package Page 28 AMP Other Curr vs Prop

-I

T

*

I I I I I I I I I

lITTl

I ~

lffi tt1it ]jJI I I I I I I

111~

I

Ops-Reducing 47782 $2117425

TotalsOps--Increaslng 0 $0

Ops-staylng 0 $0AI Operations 47782 $2 117425

Ops.-Reducing 0 $0

TotalsOps-Increasing «6333 $19244,241

Ops-51aying 241018 $10076870AI Operalions 687351 $29321111

ODs-Red 0 $0~s-Inc 0 $0

Oos-S13v 0 $0AlIOos 0 $0

ODs-Red 0 $0ODs-Inc 453391 $19583556

Oos-Sta 241018 $10076870AlIOos 694 410 $29660425

Package Page 30 AMP Other Curr vs Prop

Ops.-Reducing 14202 $674298

TotalsOps-.lncreasing 0 $0

Ops-Staylng 0 $0AI Operations 14202 $674298

Ops-Reducing 0 $0

TotalsCps-Increasing 28509 $1388 677

Ops-Staying 150.471 $7210503AI Operations 178980 $8599180

Ops-Red 0 $0Ops-Inc 0 $0

Oos-Sla 0 $0AllOos 0 $0

On.-Red 0 $0Oos--Inc 32159 S1 555848

Oo'-Stav 150.471 $7210503AllOns 182630 $8766 351

C~rrent

MODS IPercent I {%}OperaUon (%) MoYed ReductionNumber to Losing Due to EoS

Current AnouldWoI1dl<>ur Cost ($)

$154 822$849.566

·$28

ProposodMOOS

Operatio~

Number

781783730

Proposed Annuall Proposed Annual~rs WoridloUfCosl($}

$178.565$695.531

Ops..Re<iucing I 1.953 I $70.384

oI $0 II Ops-lncreasing I 0 $0Totals Ops-Staylng

All Operations I 1.953 I $70.384

Ops-Re<iudng I 0 I $0

Totals lOps-IncreaSing I 22 184 1 $804.3881Ops-Stay,ng 1 $28

AlIOperations I 22.1851 $804.416

Oos-Reds--Inc

ODs--StaAllOos

$0$0$0$0

Ops-RedOos-tnc

Op.-StaAIiOps

24.136

24.137

$0$874.097

$28$874.124

3334

Op6i 617, 679, 76.4 (31) I I $31) 129 1Opt:l76S, 766 (34) $0

$0

$0$67.755

$326.664

$8.110.384

$8.504.803207.868

3233

31

93Totals

34

01» 617, 679.764 (31) I I $326 488

1Ops 765.766 (34) $8096>49

Totals

33

9334

Cpa 617,679,7&4 (31)! I $0 IOps 765, 786 (34) $0

$0

$0

$67.755$326.664

$8.504.803

$8.110.384

Cunont AnnualWortdlour Cost

IS}

207.868Totals

3231

33

9334

01"617.679.76«31)1 I $326:488 10p6 765. 766 (34) $8096 749

Sut»etforTraM-PVS

Tab

426Totals93

SubMtforTrana.PVS

Tab

Package Page 32 AMP Other Curr vs Prop

$695.531

$5,169,054$1.065,451

$3.364.887

$20,453.353

$10,158,430

476.616

Maintenance

Proposed Annual IPropos<Id Annual\/Iloll<hou'" \/Ilorl<llour Co$t($)

Totals93

3839

3637

LDC

$0$0

$0$0

$0

$0

$0

$0$0

$0

$0$0

Totals

70

88

30

81

35

80

605040

01

2010

$0$0

$0

$0$0$0

$0

$238.070

$971,479

S103,997

$8,599.180

$5.483.733

$1,801,901

Cumtnt_Wo_COSl

($)

178.980

Cumont AlIIlIWWOI1<I1o\ors

Totals88

35

70

10

8180

40

60

01

50

2030

LDC

Supervisor summary

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0$0

$0

$0

$674,298

$124,047

$550,250

14,202Totals88

35

7060

80

40

30

50

20

81

0110

Maintenance Maintenance

Current Annual Cunant AlIIlIWProposed Annual Propos<ld AnnualLDC Wortd\Our Cost LDCWorkhours

($) \/Iloll<hou'" \/Ilorl<llo", Co$t($)

36 $1 161 787 36 $9830420 36 ~O 36 ~10 158,43037 $169,392 37 $3364887 37 $0 37 $336488738 $401,178 38 $5,169,054 38 $0 38 $5 169,05439 $140202 39 $1065,451 39 $0 39 $106545193 $46 463 93 $649566 93 $0 93 $695531Totals 44197 $1 919023 Totals 468334 $20079377 Totals 0 $0 Totals 476616 $20453353

Supervisor summary supervisory

Cumont AlIIlIWCumtnt_

Proposed ""olUllLDC Wo_COSl LDCWOI1<I1o\ors

($) \/Ilo'ld'oors

01 $0 01 S103,997 01 0 $0 01 S10399710 $550,250 10 $5483733 10 0 $0 10 S5 650 90420 $0 20 $0 20 0 $0 20 $030 $0 30 $971,479 30 0 $0 30 $971 47935 $0 35 $1,801,901 35 0 $0 35 $1,801 90140 $0 40 $0 40 0 $0 40 $050 $0 50 $0 50 0 $0 50 $060 $0 60 $0 60 0 $0 60 $070 $0 70 $0 70 0 $0 70 $080 $124,047 80 $238070 80 0 $0 80 $23807081 $0 81 $0 81 0 $0 81 SO88 $0 88 $0 88 0 $0 88 $0Totals 14202 $674298 Totals 178980 $8599180 Totals 0 $0 Totals 182630 18 766 351

I Summary by Sub-GroupCurrent - Combined Special Adjustments Proposed + Special Adjustments ChangeCombined - • Combined -

Annual \Nttfwhoua Annual Dahf"$ Annua\'\'ori(houf8 Annual Dollars Annual WorkhOUlll Annual Mara 'Notkhour Ch8lnoe % Change Dcbrn Chan9l:t Percent Chan~

'Othfi Craft' Ops (not~ 1) 34914 $1681,800 0 $0 30532 $1479366 1438, {$202434:1Tran~ Ops (note 2) 206 477 $8,454 366 1252 $51 420 207303 $8474,657 625 $;

Mainbtnaoce Ops (note 3) 512,531 $21 998,400 0 $0 476616 $20,453,353 {3S Si5' ($!5,1SUpervbory Of)& 193,182 $9273,478 0 $0 182630 $8766,351 (10,552' (S50

SupWC,..rt Joint Ops (note 4) 5,348 $178770 0 $0 5,348 $178593 C)

Total 952452 $41 586813 1252 $51 420 902429 $39352320 (SO,0231

$51,420

Proposed AnnualWorkh""rs

Total Ad

Notes.-1) 1", Opa going to lfa.-.PVS' & 'MainteniJfl~' Tabt

2) going to Tf1lI'\$-PVS tab

3} ~ng to Matntenllnce teb

4) leM O~ OOin9 to 'Maint&f'\.ll.I"\Ctl' Ta~

$0 Total Ad- 1.252 $51,420

Package Page 33 AMP Other Curr vs Prop

Staffing - ManagementLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DFData Extraction Date: 09/22/09 Finance Number: 054795

Management Positions(1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

Current Auth Current ProposedDifference

AMPPosition Title Level Prop vs

LineStaffing On-Rolls Staffing

CurrentImpacts

1 MGR PROCESSING/DISTRIBUTION FCLTY EAS-22 1 1 0 -1 -1

2 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-19 1 1 0 -1 -1

3 MGR MAINTENANCE EAS-17 1 1 0 -1 -1

4 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-17 1 1 0 -1 -1

5 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 4 :3 0 -3 -3

6789101112131415161718

~232425262728293031323334353637383940414243

Package Page 34 AMP Staffing PCES/EAS

44454647484950 "

515253545556

Kit6061626364656667686970717273747576777879

Totals 8 7 0 (7) (7)

Retirement Eligibles: 1

Position Change: Proposed vs. Current: I (7) IPosition Impacts Due to AMP:I (7) I

Package Page 35 AMP Staffing - PCES/EAS

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DCData Extraction Date: 09/22/09 Finance Number: 056679

Management Positions(12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18)

Current Auth Current ProposedDifference

AMPPosition Title Level Prop vslinE Staffing On-Rolls Staffing

CurrentImpacts

1 SR PLANT MANAGER (2) PCES-01 1 1 1 0 0

2 MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS-25 1 1 1 0 0

3 MGR MAINTENANCE EAS-25 1 1 1 0 0

4 SR MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS

II1 1 1 E±3 0

5 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS -2 2 2 2 0

6 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS -23 3 3 3 0 0

7 MGR TRANSPORTATION/NElWORKS -23 1 1 1 0 0

8 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS -22 2 2 2 0 0

9 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-21 1 () 0 0 0

10 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FI EAS-21 3 3 3 0 0

11 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-20 1 1 1 0 0

12 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS-20 1 1 1 0 0

13 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-20 1 1 1 0 0

14 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST EAS-19 1 () 1 1 0

15 MGR FIELD MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-19 1 /) 1 1 0

16 MGR PVS OPERATIONS EAS-19 1 1 1 0 0

17 NElWORKS SPECIALIST EAS-18 1 1 1 0 0

18 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-18 2 2 2 0 0

19 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-17 8 6 8 2 0

20 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 36 36 38 2 2

21 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 13 11 13 2 0

22 SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS-17 5 5 5 0 0

23 NElWORKS SPECIALIST EAS-16 2 2 2 0 0

24 ASSOCIATE SUPERVISOR-DIST OPS EAS-15 0 1 0 -1 0

25 MAIL FLOW CONTROLLER EAS-14 0 1 0 -1 0

26 SECRETARY (FLO) EAS-12 1 1 1 0 0

2728293031323334353637383940414243444546

Package Page 36 AMP Staffing PCES/EAS

474849505152535455565758596061626364

656667686970717273747576777879

Total 90 85 91 6 2

Retirement Eligibles: 15Position Change: Proposed vs. Currentl 6 I

Position Impacts Due to AMP: I 2 ITotal PCES/EAS Position Loss: 5 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

«/'/S}/ '''''

(y ,'xII

Package Page 37 AMP Staffing - PCES/EAS

Staffing - CraftLast Saved: February 16. 2010

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF Finance Number: 054795

Data Extraction Date: 09/22/09

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Craft Positions Casuals Part Time Full Time Total TotalDifference

On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls ProposedFunction 1 - Clerk 0 19 56 75 0 (75)Function 4 - Clerk 0 0 0Function 1 - Mail Handler 0 3 19 22 0 (22)

Function 4 - Mail Handler 0 0 0Function 1 & 4 Sub-Total 0 22 75 97 0 (97)

Function 3A - Vehicle Service 0 0 0Function 38 - Maintenance 0 0 25 25 0 (25Functions 67-69 - Lmtd/RehablWC 0 0Other Functions 0 0 2 2 0 (2

Total 0 22 102 124 0 (124)

Retirement Eligibles: 26

~'l\ltg_~~~)f*'W~':!.W".m~~f&'JfJ\1~tt&_'%t~.__"l&\l!'t'JlI~Ij!,,~'illill'~~IWillfiL~••~!\W'h~\

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DC Finance Number: 056679

Data Extraction Date: 09/22/09

(7) (8) (9) (10) (11 ) (12)

Craft Positions Casuals Part Time Full Time Total TotalDifference

On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls ProposedFunction 1 - Clerk 0 0 515 515 567 52Function 1 - Mail Handler 0 64 388 452 465 13

Function 1 Sub-Total 0 64 903 967 1,032 65Function 3A - Vehicle Service 0 13 99 112 112 0Function 38 - Maintenance 0 , 0 272 272 276 d

Functions 67-69 - Lmtd/RehablWC - 0 2 2 2 (

Other Functions 0 0 7 7 7 (

Total 0 77 1,283 1,360 1,429 69

Retirement Eligibles: 342

Total Craft Position Loss: 55 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(13) Notes:

tevi!111Q'$/1lQ'1'!l.l)

Package Page 38 AMP Staffing - Craft

MaintenanceLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2008: Jun-30-2009

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DC

(6)

Difference

Difference

695,531 $

(5)Proposed

Cost

(4)

649,566 $

1,065,451 $ 1,065,451 $

5,169,054 $ 5,169,054 $

9,830,420 $ 10,158,430 $

3,364,887 $ 3,364,887 $

Current Cost

$ 20,079,377 $ 20,453,353 $

Mail Processing $Equipment

Building Services $(Cus/odial Cleanmg)

Maintenance $Operations Support

Building Equipment $

(3)

Difference

I Difference I

o $

o $

o $

o $

o $

o $

(2)Proposed

Cost

46,463 $

(1)

140,202 $

401,178 $

169,392 $

1,919,023 $

1,161,787 $

Current Cost

Mail Processing $Equipment

Building Services $(Cus/odial Cleaning)

Maintenance $Operations Support

Building Equipment $

Total Maintenance Parts, Supplies & $Facility Utilities 301,209 $ o $ Total

Maintenance Parts, Supplies & $Facility Utilities

3,588,231 $ 3,912,538 $

$ o $ o

\'0"" t n"*'l'f' "'~~ Grand 1IZ.1'

j ~"""'",0'0;;

$ 2,220,232 $ o $ $ 23,667,608 $ 24,365,891 $

Annual Maintenance Savings: ..,.,;,..,.,;,_..,.,;,__ (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(7) Notes _

P:>r'k:>r1'" Page 39 AMP Maintenance

Transportation - PVSLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility: Marysville GA P&DFFinance Number: 054795

--::-:=-:-::--;-:-:::"-;:-----:---Date Range of Data: 07/01/08 - to- 06/30109

Gaining Facility: Sacramento GA P&DGFinance Number: 056679.--;:....:;..;,...;;".;...=--------

PVS Transportation Savings (Gaining Facility): I ($64,319)1

(4) (5) (6)Current Proposed Difference

PVS Owned EquipmentSeven Ton Trucks 1 1 0

Eleven Ton Trucks 12 12 0

Single Axle Tractors 37 37 0

Tandem Axle Tractors 4 4 0

Spotters 2 2 0

($33,190) «== (This number is summed with Total from Trans-HCR' and carried forward to theExecutive Summary as Transportation Savings)

o

o

$0

17,431)

($12,899

241

2,421,469

$1,791,887

241

2,404,038

$1,778,988

AdjustmentsPrOp'lal))

Total Mileage Costs

Total Lease Costs

LOC 31 (617,679,764)

LOC 34 (765, 766)

Total Vehicles Leased

Total Number of Schedules

Total Annual Mileage

PVS Workhour Costs

PVS Leases

PVS Transportation

PVS Transportation Savings (Losing Facility): I $31,1291

Total PVS Transportation Savings:

(1) (2) (3)Current Proposed Difference

PVS Owned EquipmentSeven Ton Trucks 0

Eleven Ton Trucks 0

Single Axle Tractors 0

Tandem Axle Tractors 0

Spotters 0

PVS TransportationTotal Number of Schedules 0Total Annual Mileage 0

Total Mileage Costs $0

PVS LeasesTotal Vehicles Leased 0

Total Lease Costs $0

PVS Workhour CostsLOC 31 (617, 679, 764) $31,129 $0 .$31:mLOC 34 (765, 766) $0

::~Adjustments~If10l;~~;~~t~~~~:;p~~:~ $31,129 $0 $31,129

(7) Notes: PVS mileage increased to account for two round trips to SMFTH which would be serviced by PVS.Added 1,252 hours to LDG 34 under PVS workhour costs. Mileage increase cost = (.74x17431)

Package Page 40 AMP Transportation - PVS

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF

Transportation - HeRLast Saved: February 16,2010

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DC

Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Orig & Dest_...:::.-._--------Data Extraction Date:

CET for cancellations: CET for OGP:

CT for Outbound Dock:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed

Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost per Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost perNumbers Milea e Cost Mile Milea e Cost Mile Numbers Mileaae Cost Mile Mileaae Cost Mile

95910 230,410 $501,295 $2.18 $0 $0.0095913 124,196 $191,335 $1.54 $0 $0.0095930 33,641 $68,506 $2.04 $0 $0.00 95930 $0.00 50,188 $102,384 $2.0495934 61,734 $114,270 $1.85 $0 $0.00 95934 $0.00 72,129 $133,438 $1.8595935 50,232 $103,551 $2.06 $0 $0.00 95935 $0.00 165,268 $340,452 $2.0695936 121,687 $198,474 $1.63 $0 $0.00 95936 $0.00 190,218 $310,055 $1.6395937 119,098 $249,732 $2.10 $0 $0.00 95937 $0.00 184,497 $387,444 $2.1095938 107,182 $229,649 $2.14 $0 $0.00 95938 $0.00 183,286 $392,232 $2.1495938 124,334 $255,761 $2.06 $0 $0.00 95938 $0.00 218,915 $450,965 $2.0695939 135,810 $255,653 $1.88 $0 $0.00 95939 $0.00 143,304 $269,411 $1.8895941 6,547 $30,071 $4.59 $0 $0.0095947 26,911 $81,238 $3.02 $0 $0.00 95947 $0.00 274,907 $625,256 $2.2795948 49,825 $98,312 $1.97 $0 $0.00 95948 $0.00 73,440 $144,676 $1.9795981 77,761 $157,399 $2.02 $0 $0.00 95981 $0.00 101,138 $204,298 $2.02959A3 111,229 $125,745 $1.13 $0 $0.00 959A3 $0.00 138,219 $156,186 $1.13959LO 44,400 $98,558 $2.22 $0 $0.00 959LO $0.00 68,158 $151,311 $2.2294014 100,261 $156,416 $1.56 $0 $0.0094896 649,015 $1,305,782 $2.01 421,441 $916,596 $2.17 94690 646,731 $1,447,542 $2.24 731,021 $1,637,487 $2.24948CK 811,533 $1,306,219 $1.61 748,373 $1,219,808 $1.63

Package Page 41 AMP Transportation - HeR

1 2 3 4 5 6 7Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed

Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost perNumbers Mileaae Cost Mile Mileaae Cost Mile

Package Page 42

8 9 10 11 12 13 14Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed

Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost perNumbers Mileage Cost Mile Mileage Cost Mile

AMP Transportation - HeR

1 2 3 4 5 6 7Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed

Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost perNumbers Mileaqe Cost Mile Mileaqe Cost Mile

8 9 10 11 12 13 14Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed

Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost perNumbers Mileaqe Cost Mile Mileaqe Cost Mile

CurrentLosing

36,342

Movingto Gain (-)

o

OtherChanges

(+1-)

o

Trips fromGaining

o

Proposed Result

36,342

CurrentGaining

216,309

Movingto Lose (-)

o

OtherChanges

(+1-)

o

Trips fromLosing

o

Proposed Result

216,309

HCR Annual Savings (Losing Facility): $3,391,560

Total HCR Transportation Savings: ($466,493)

Package Page 43

HCR Annual Savings (Gaining Facility): ($3,858,053)

«== (This number is summed with Total from 'Trans-PVS' and canied forwardto the Executive Summary as Transportation Savings)

AMP Transportation - HeR

Distribution ChangesLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DFType of Distribution to Consolidate:..::O:..:n.:;g;z..:::&:..;D=e.::.st:- _

Indicate each DMM labeling list affected by placingan "X" to the left of the list

If revisions to DMM LOOS or DMM L201 are needed, Indicateproposed DMM label change below

(3) DMM Labelln List L201 - Periodicals On In S

Cok.lmn B-3· . It ZIP Code Destinations Column C • Label to

Action Codes. A=a1d [)=;:delete CF-d1ange from CT change to

lmoort'nt Notej Sectfon 2 & 3 illustrate possib~ changes to DMM labeling lists. Section 2 retates to consolidation of DestinationOperations. SectIon 3 pertains to Originating Operatklns, The Area Distribution Network group wiH submit appropriate reques1s forDMM changes after AMP approval.

) DMM Labeling List LOOS - 3-Diglt ZIP Code Prefix Groups - SCF Sortatlon

From:

Action Code" Column A· 3-Dlgit liP Code Prefix Group Column B ¥ Label to

D 959 MARYSVILLE CA 959

CF 942, 956-958 SCF SACRAMENTO CA 956

To:

Action Code· Column A • 3·Dlgit ZIP Code Prefix Group Column B • Label to

CT 942 956-959 SCF SACRAMENTO CA 956

- -

(2

DMM LOOl DMM LOll

DMM LOO2 X DMM L201

DMM LOO3 DMM LBOl

DMMLOO<I ---DMM LB02

DMM LOO5 DMM LB03

DMM LOOS DMM LBO<

DMM LOO7 DMM LB05

DMM LOOS DMM LBOO

DMMLOO9 X DMM LB07

DMM L010 DMM L80f

Column A • Ent ZIP Codes

x

X

ActionCode"

(1)

D 959590-599,800-816,820-838,840-847,850-853,855-857,859,860,863-865,870-875,877-879,881-884,889-891,893-895,897,898,900-908,910-928,930-966,970-986,988-994,998,999

590-599,800-816,820-838,840-847,850-853,855-857,859,860,863-865,870-875,877-879,881-884,889-891,893-895,897,898,900-908,910-928,930-966,970-986,988-994,998, 999

Column B - 3-D it lIP Code Destinations

590-599,800-816,820-838,840-847,850-853,855-857,859,860,863-865,870-875,877-879,881-884,889-891,893-895,897,898,900-908,910-928,930-966,970-986,988-994,998,999

Column B • 3¥D' It ZIP Code Destinations

Column B ~ 3·0' it ZiP Code Destinations

OMX MARYSVILLE CA 959

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts - FAST Appointment Summary ReP<lrl

Month LostnglG«inlngNASS

Facility NameTotal No-Show Late Arrival 0 n Closed Unschd

Code Sch<! ADots Count % Count % Count % Count % Count

AUQ Losing Facility 959 MARYSVILLE 248 53 21% 108 44% 0 0% 194 78% 1

Sep Losing Facility 959 MARYSVILLE 251 55 22% 92 37% 2 1% 194 77% 0

AUQ Galnina Facility 956 SACRAMENTO 651 160 25% 141 22% 0 0% 491 75% 13

Sep Gaining Facility 956 SACRAMENTO 704 203 29% 144 20% 16 2% 485 69% 36

(5) Notes:

Upon approval of AMP L002 and L607 will require changes. APproval will also require the coordination of the publication of labeling list changes with the area FASTcoordinator for the redirection of drop Shipments.

Package Page 44 AMP Distribution Changes

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF

Data Extraction Date: 01/04/10

MPE InventoryLast Saved: February 16, 2010

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DC

(1 ) (2) (3)

EquipmentCurrent Proposed

DifferenceType

Number Number

AFCS 2 0 (2)

AFSM -ALL 1 0 (1)

APPS 0 OJ 0

ClOSS 0 0 0

CSBCS 0 0 0

DBCS 4 0 (4)

DBCS-OSS 2 0 (2)

DIOSS 2 OJ (2)

FSS 0 0 0

SPBS 1 0 (1)UFSM 1 0 (1)

FC I MICRO MARK 1 0 (1)

ROBOT GANTRY (I (I 0

HSTS/HSUS OJ 0 0

LCTS/LCUS 0 (I 0

LIPS 0 0 0

MLOCR-ISS OJ (I 0

MPBCS-OSS 0 (I 0

TABBER 0 (I 0

POWEREDINDUSTRIAL 6 (6)EQUIPMENT

(4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

EquipmentCurrent Proposed

DifferenceExcess Relocation

TypeNumber Number Equipment Costs

AFCS 7 7 0 (2)

AFSM 100 4 5 1 0 $59,412

APPS 1 1 0 0 $0

ClOSS 3 3 0 0 $0

CSBCS 0 0 0 0 $0

DBCS 34 38 4 0 $38,640

DBCS-OSS 8 10 2 0 $19,320

DIOSS 7 9 2 0 $19,320

FSS 0 (I 0 0 $0

SPBS 1 1 0 (1) $0UFSM 2 2 0 (1) $0

FC I MICRO MARK 3 4 1 0 $0

ROBOT GANTRY 0 0 0 0 $0

HSTSI HSUS 0 (I 0 0 $0

LCTSI LCUS 6 6 0 0 $0

LIPS 0 0 0 0 $0

MLOCR-ISS 0 () 0 0 $0

MPBCS-OSS 0 0 0 0 $0

TABBER 0 0 0 0 $0

POWEREDINDUSTRIAL 28 34 6 0 $0EQUIPMENT

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs from Losing to Gaining Facility: $136,692 (This number is carried forward to Space Evaluation and

Other Costs)

(9) Notes: DBCS relocation costs =$9,660 per DBCS. Space & Other Costs worksheet includes $35K one-time costs for electrical support for DBCSs.

Package Page 45 AMP MPE Inventory

Customer Service IssuesLast Saved February 16,2010

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF

5.Dlglt ZIP Code: 95901Data Extraction Date:-':;1~0/=::279/:"'0"::'"9------

1. Collection PointsNumber picked up before 1 p.m,

Number picked up between 1·5 p.m. II _.Number picked up after 5 p.m,

Total Number of Collection Points

2. How many collection boxes are designated for "local delivery"?

3. How many "local delivery" boxes will be removed as a result of AMP?

4. Delivery Performance Report

[-~

I 0 I

% Camers retumin9 before 5 p.m.

QuarterlFY Percent

4/2009 88.0%

3/2009 92.5%

2/2009 94.4%

112009 91,0%

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (WIndow Service Times)

Start End

Monday NA NA

Tuesday NA NA

Wednesday NA NA

Thursday NA NA

Friday NA NA

Saturday NA NA

6. Business (Bulk) Mall Acceptance Hours

Wednesday

Thursday

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark In accordance with applicable policies In the Postal Operations Manual?

8. Notes:

Gaining Facility: Sacramento CA P&DC

9. What postmark will be printed on collection mall?

Line 1 Sacramento CA 957

Line 2 dateltlme

YES

Package Page 46 AMP Customer Service Issues

Space Evaluation and Other Costs

last Saved: February 16,2010

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF

1. Affected FacilityFacility Name Marysville P&DF

Street Address: 5050 Arboga RdCity, State ZIP: Olivehurst CA 95961-9997

2. Lease Information. (If not leased skip to 3 below.)Enter annual lease cost NA

Enter lease expiration date-7N:'::A:.......--------------Enter lease optionslterms --'.N;;..A:....... _

3. Current Square FootageEnter the total interior square footage of the facil~~s_='5,'=_33::.:3o:_-------------

Enter gained square footage expected with the AMF--"S"'5,""33::::3::.- _

4. Planned use for acquired space from approved AMI

Recommend propertY be put to different use or be sole

5. Facility Costs

Enter any projected one-time facility costs:...:..:!:$;:;50;=.,,"'OO=O-;--;-_-;-;---:-:;--~_=:__;;__.,____;:_(This number shown below under One-TIme Costs section.

6. Savings Information

Space Savings ($):_=-=-_--:-_--:--:-:-_-:-:--::-=----;:----;:,--_(This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

7.

Employee Relocation Costs: $292,378

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs: $136,692(from MPE Inventory )

Facility Costs: -..:!:$.::.;50:J.'.::.;OOO::.::- _(from above)

Total One-Time Costs: $479,070(This number carried forward to Executive Summary)

Losing Facility: Marysville CA P&DF Gaining Facility: ..:;S..:;acra=me~nc.:.:to_'C:.;.A-'P_'&..:;D...:;C _

YTDRangeofReport: _'0:.;.7~/0~1/~08~:_06~I3O~/09~ ___

(1) (2) (3)

Current CostProduct Associated REC per 1,000

Images

lettenl Salt LakeC' tv REC $30.59Flats SaItLakeC' tv REC $30.42

PARSCOA Salt Lake C' tv REC $174.55PARS Redirects Salt Lake C' :v REC $40.48

APPS Salt LakeC' :vREC

Package Page 47

(4) (5) (s)

Current CostProduct AMociated REC per 1,000

Images

Letters Salt Lake C' vREC $30.59Flats Salt LakeC' v REC $30.42

PARSCOA Salt Lake C' yREC $174.55PARS Redirects Salt Lake C' yREC $40.48

APPS Salt Lake C' tv REC

AMP Space Evaluation and Other Costs

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC547951p&DF GENOVA MICHAEL E 3191825 95741131 TECHNICIAN 10 168 38 1 361 85600201 10/16/19931 1

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC54795\P&DF PERTU8AL STEVEN L 3076683 95689288 TECHNICIAN 10 168 38 1 361 8560020\ 8/19/1995\ 1

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC547951p&DF CHOW RAYMOND W 3108140 95862339 TECHNICIAN I 101168138 1 36\ 85600201 6/7/19971 1

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC547951p&DF WALTZ 8RYAN V 3275355 70215245 TECHNICIAN 10 168 38 36 85600201 5/23/19981 51

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC547951p&DF WARD LAWRENCE A 3421876 95679094 TECHNICIAN 10 168 38 36 85600201 4/24/1999

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC I101168138547951p&DF 8EARD DARRELL J 3025583 95729341 TECHNICIAN 1 361 85600201 9/6/20031 1

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC547951P&DF FLORES NORMAN C 1603889 70301283 TECHNICIAN I 101168138 1 361 85600201 2/21/20041

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC54795 P&DF MOULTON R08ERT 8 3254555 70215243 TECHNICIAN I 101168138 1 361 85600201 3/20/20041 1

MARYSVILLE ELECTRONIC54795 P&DF STRAUSSJR CHRISTOPHER D 3502215 70215244 TECHNICIAN I 101168138 1 361 85600201 8/6/20051 1

<::::....Q-'Ife- ~\-- ...c1.

~-'Y' I. v \-t--J

~-y-_ ....h-,t

MARYSVILLE LABORER547941 PO STORM RUDY 3276486 95852795 CUSTODIAL I 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX 1 5/27/1995

MARYSVILLE LABORER547951p&DF AVERS DAVID T 3378218 95757042 CUSTODIAL 1 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX 1 9/26/1998

MARYSVILLE LABORER547951p&DF HOLSTON RICHARD G 3396026 95664746 CUSTODIAL I 41 16613B 1 381350203XX 1 9/23/2000

MARYSVILLE LABORER547951p&DF GRABINSKI MICHAEL J 2987297 95740494 CUSTODIAL 1 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX 1 1/6/2006

MARYSVILLE LABORER547951p&DF KNAB KEVIN J 2963453 95511720 CUSTODIAL 1 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX 1 3/18/20061 1

MARYSVILLE LABORER547941 PO SHIELDS DANIEL R 3009212 95861207 CUSTODIAL 1 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX 1 4/1/20061 1

MARYSVILLE LABORER547941 PO CLINE ERIC D 3295835 95778837 CUSTODIAL 1 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX I 10/13/20071 1

MARYSVILLE LABORER54795 P&DF STITH JR JOSEPH A 4053301 70151759 CUSTODIAL 1 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX 1 2/2/20081 1

MARYSVILLE LABORER54795 P&DF HOOD ANDREW 4063039 70167274 CUSTODIAL 1 41 16613B 1 381 350203XX 1 4/26/20081 1

MARYSVILLE LABORER54795 P&DF TRAN HON H 3417377 95553345 CUSTODIAL I 41 16613B I 381350203XX 1 5/23/20091 1

J-y ,- ...\--~

Maintenance Mechanic L-7

MAl NTENANCE547951MARYSVILLE P&DF IKENNEDY IMARY IE I 32582661 701452171MECHANIC

MAINTENANCE547951MARYSVILLE P&DF IMARTINEZ IWILLIAM IJ I 30325351 955491931MECHANIC

71 168138

71 167138

12/6/1986

5/23/1998

~~,,",,~ .. l

-<.tl-...rc.. (..~ ....)