Postclosure Modeling and Analyses Design …QA:QA TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 January 2008 Postclosure...

.(,.-...,.\ ' ..~-tt,7···.

1..... ).......

~BECHTELSAle C(MY,J,"I'UC

ENG.20080108.0002

QA:QA

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02

January 2008

Postclosure Modeling and Analyses DesignParameters

- - - - -NOTICE OF OPEN CHANGE DOCUMENTS - THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPACTED BYTHE LISTED CHANGE DOCUMENTS AND CANNOT BE USED WITHOUT THEM.

1) ACN-001, DATED 03/11/2008

Prepared for:U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Civilian Radioactive Waste ManagementOffice of Repository Development1551 Hillshire DriveLas Vegas, Nevada 89134-6321

Prepared by:Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC1180 Town Center DriveLas Vegas, Nevada 89144

Under Contract NumberDE-AC28-01 RW121 01

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 ii of x January 2008

DISCLAIMER

This document was developed by Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC (BSC) and is solely intended for the use of BSC in its work for the Yucca Mountain Project.

Postclosure Modeling and Analyses Design Parameters

SSCTECHNICAL REPORT SIGNATURE PAGEl

CHANGE HISTORY

Complete only applicable items.

1. QA: QA

2. Total Pages: 80

3. Technical Report Title


4.01 (including Rev. No.)

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 Revision 02Printed Name Signature Date. _.

.,,'

·~~U/t/ll!~~~L~"'/71;<Jl5'5. Originator R L. KellerlR. H. Spencer Jr. '-. '//7iov

/jJU,j( --/ "" /6. Checker O. D. Smith I /1"1-(lJf-7.QER N. E. Husting ~~. 2/'A:> //7/ZteB

i'..." ~ - ~

1-7- "Df?8. Lead or Supervisor J. S. Whitcraft ~y

9. Responsible Manager or J. S. Whitcraft ( c:::::::::i:::£~ _I-?- ~'8'Project Engineer ~~-\7

9b. Affected Manager Approval RE. Rusinko L/;?£ 4 I/B/08for 100 /., ..,"':\;". I

10. RemarksRevision 0 I Originator responsibilities: R L. Keller selected direct inputs to the report and developed the results presented inSection 6 of the report. R H. Spencer Jr. selected other references cited and prepared the balance of the report. The followingindividuals were contributors to the development of this report: M. Anderson, D. Darling, T. Ehrhorn, T. McCormick, D. Mecham,R Rajagopal, D. Rhodes, R Saunders, J. Schmitt, J. Steinhoff, S. Su, D. Tang, E. Thomas, 1. Tutterrow, M. Woods, and R.Zimmerman. N. Brown checked the check copy (draft la), the back-check copy (draft Ib), and the back-check comment resolutioncopy (draft lc) prior to departing BSC. RW. Andrews completed the fmal check.Revision 02 Originator responsibilities: RH. Spencer Jr. revised the report. RL Keller contributed to revising the report, includingwith regard to resolving comments and incorporating comment resolutions.Change History

11. Revision No. 12. Description of Change

00 Original issue.

01 Complete revision to incorporate parameters from updated analysis and model reports and to deve,lopderived design requirements. Removes statement concerning stainless-steel-clad fuel inresponse toCondition Report 4534. Establishes an interface constraint for the maximum temperature for the HLW glasscanisters in response to Condition Report 8254. The waste package surface temperature constraint has beenclarified in response to Condition Report 8374. Corrected the stress corrosion cracking threshold value inresponse to Condition Report 9844. Provides technical basis for the drift wall temperature limit of200degrees C in response to Condition Report 7969. Implements decision proposal TMRB-2006-021.

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 iii ofx January 2008


TECHNICAL REPORT SIGNATURE PAGE/ 1. QA: QA BSC CHANGE HISTORY

2. Total Pages: 80 Complete only applicable items.

Change History (continued)

11. Revision No. 12. Description of Change

02 Revised to incorporate changes to Table 1 authorized by TMRB decision proposals TMRB-2007-049 (delete Parameter 09-02, modify parameter 01-18, add parameters 01-20, -21, -22, and 03-16 d) [removal of oxide film], and update bases of Parameter 06-02), TMRB-2007-061 (clarify Parameter 05-02), TMRB-2007-062 (add Parameter 02-03 d) [dust mitigation]), and TMRB-2007-066 (revise parameters 01-14 and 04-04, add Parameters 03-26 and 06-06, and delete Parameters 03-25 and 07-05, -06, and –17). Revised word ing o f Parameter 03-12 to add constraint for the number of plates used in fabricating the waste package Alloy-22 outer corrosion barrier, as stated in the cited basis and authorized in TMRB-2005-024. Revised wording of Parameters 03-14, 04-08, 07-09, 07-12, and 07-14 to delete specific process constraints that are covered by invoking standard nuclear industry practices. Noted that compliance with Parameters 06-03 and 07-08 is only demonstrated in postclosure analyses. Revised Parameter 07-10 to address the difference between inspections for full penetration welds and fillet welds. Deleted manual shielded metal-arc welding as an acceptable welding technique from Parameter 07-11. Clarified parameters 01-17, 03-04, 03-05, 04-07, and 05-01, and strengthened parameter 09-03 in response to review comments. Removed proposed ranges/tolerances from Parameters 01-10 and 01-13 and added Section 7 to address proposed parameter ranges. Incorporated ACN 03 to REV 01. Updated references and made other editorial clarifications.

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 iv of x January 2008


CONTENTS

Page

1. PURPOSE AND INTENDED USE...........................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE.........................................................................................................................1 1.2 STATUS IN DOCUMENT HIERARCHY ......................................................................2 1.3 INTENDED USE..............................................................................................................2 1.4 LIMITATIONS ON USE .................................................................................................3

2. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................5 2.1 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................5 2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS .........................................................5

2.2.1 Review of FEPs Screening Decisions...................................................................5 2.2.2 Review of other Models, Analyses, and other Supporting Documents ................6

3. QUALITY ASSURANCE.........................................................................................................9

4. USE OF SOFTWARE .............................................................................................................11

5. INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................................13 5.1 INPUTS...........................................................................................................................13 5.2 ASSUMPTIONS.............................................................................................................13

6. POSTCLOSURE DESIGN PARAMETERS ..........................................................................15

7. PROPOSED RANGES FOR SELECTED PARAMETERS...................................................63

8. INPUTS AND REFERENCES................................................................................................65 8.1 DOCUMENTS CITED...................................................................................................65 8.2 CODES, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS, DIRECTIVES, AND

PROCEDURES...............................................................................................................69

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 v of x January 2008


INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 vi of x January 2008


TABLES

Page

Table 1. Postclosure Design Parameters....................................................................................... 16 Table 2. Proposed Ranges of Values for Selected Parameters ..................................................... 63

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 vii of x January 2008



TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 viii of x January 2008


ACRONYMS

10 CFR Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations

AMRs analysis and model reports ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

BSC Bechtel SAIC Co., LLC BWR boiling water reactor

CSNF commercial spent nuclear fuel

DEMs discipline engineering managers DHLW defense high level waste DIRS document input reference system DOE U.S. Department of Energy DSC drip shield connector DSNF defense-related spent nuclear fuel

EBS engineered barrier system EG RAO Engineering Requirements Area Owner ET eddy current examination/testing

FEPs features, events and processes

GMAW gas metal arc weld GTAW gas tungsten arc weld GWd/MTU gigawatt days per metric ton of uranium

HLW high-level radioactive waste

IDD interface definition document IED information exchange document ITWI important to waste isolation

LA license application LaBS lanthanum borosilicate

MCO multicanister overpack MIC microbially influenced corrosion MOX mixed oxide fuel MT metric ton

NSNF naval spent nuclear fuel

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 ix of x January 2008


ACRONYMS (Continued)

PT liquid penetrant testing PWR pressurized water reactor

QA quality assurance RAO requirements area owner RHH repository host horizon RT radiographic examination/testing

SCC stress corrosion cracking SNF spent nuclear fuel SSCs structures, systems, and components SZ saturated zone

TAD transport, aging, and disposal TFMs tracers, fluids, and materials TMRB Technical Management Review Board TSPA Total System Performance Assessment

U-235 Uranium-235 UNS Unified Numbering System UT ultrasonic examination/testing UZ unsaturated zone

VT visual examination/testing

wt% weight-percent

YMP Yucca Mountain Project

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 x of x January 2008


1. PURPOSE AND INTENDED USE

1.1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to:

x� Establish as controlled internal design constraints for repository structures, systems, and components (SSCs) the specific functions that are estimated to affect performance assessment results and the specific values or ranges of values chosen for controlling parameters as reference bounds for design.

x� Identify as controlled interface parameters those other functions and parameters that are relied upon to define and control the interface between design of the repository and postclosure performance assessment of the repository.

The controlled internal design constraints established in this report are derived from statements in postclosure analyses that credit functions as modeled in those analyses to specific design features and their controlling parameters. This includes statements that credit design features and their controlling parameters to conclude that a feature, event, or process is very unlikely or that it would not significantly affect performance assessment results.

The controlled interface parameters identified in this report are other design parameters (i.e., they are not controlling parameters) that have been cited as inputs to postclosure models and analyses. These parameters are characteristics of engineered barrier system SSCs that must be accounted for in models and analyses, but that are not currently estimated to be critical to performance assessment results. (This is the case because these parameter values are driven by design decisions or by design inputs other than waste isolation functions.) Values or ranges of values of these parameters were generally determined during conceptual or preliminary design as design outputs. Thus the identification of these parameters as internal design constraints or design inputs is inappropriate. However, the integrity of performance assessment models and analyses and the integrity of subsequent design process outputs depend on these parameters remaining stable at their established values or ranges of values. Their identification as controlled interface parameters will ensure consistency between the repository as designed and constructed and the repository as modeled in the assessment of postclosure performance. It is understood that controlled interface parameter values and ranges simply reflect the as-designed, as-analyzed condition. Interface control parameter values and ranges may be changed or expanded to accommodate design evolution and any necessary changes with sufficient additional analyses and agreement from both Bechtel SAIC Co., LLC (BSC) and the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Lead Laboratory for Repository Systems (hereinafter “Lead Laboratory”).

To achieve its purpose, this report presents the design parameters used as input in postclosure models, analyses, and supporting calculations and, based on the usage of each parameter, either establishes the parameter’s value or range of values as a controlled internal design constraint or identifies the interface control mechanism for the parameter (or parameter set). The design parameters and their associated controlled internal design constraints or interface control mechanisms are presented in Section 6 of this report.

TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 1 of 70 January 2008


1.2 STATUS IN DOCUMENT HIERARCHY

This report is an interface definition document as defined in CC-PRO-2001, Technical Interface Control, and is designated a Level 4 technical baseline document, as described in EG-PRO-3DP-G04B-00005, Configuration Management. The Technical Management Review Board (TMRB) is the change control authority for this report.

1.3 INTENDED USE

Both the controlled internal design constraints and the controlled interface parameters presented in this report are internal constraints. Accordingly, this report is to be managed within the requirements management system as an internal-constraints document in accordance with RQ-PRO-2000, Managing Internal Constraints. This report will be allocated to the Engineering Requirements Area Owner (EG RAO).

Controlled internal design constraints presented in this report are to be implemented during the design process by the EG RAO (as the design authority) in accordance with EG-PRO-3DP-G04B-00005 or, where appropriate, allocated to another RAO for implementation. Implementation of controlled internal design constraints during the design process will involve allocation of the internal constraints to systems or facilities, the selection and application of appropriate codes and standards, and the translation of internal constraints into design through the hierarchy of design media as discussed in EG-PRO-3DP-G03B-00001, Design Process.

It is important to note that the design authority’s responsibility is limited to implementing the controlled internal design constraints such that compliance can be demonstrated (with the use of performance confirmation data as necessary) only up to the time of repository closure. The responsibility for demonstrating any future postclosure state with respect to compliance with internal design constraints rests with the Lead Laboratory. Further, the Lead Laboratory retains responsibility for demonstrating how and to what extent compliance with the internal design constraints contributes to barrier capability.

Interface control parameters presented in this report are to be controlled during the design process by the EG RAO in accordance with EG-PRO-3DP-G04B-00005, Section 3. Any changes that affect the interface control parameters are to be classified as Level 4 changes and thus will require TMRB authorization prior to implementation. Note that TMRB authorization ensures that both BSC and the Lead Laboratory agree that the need for the change justifies accepting the impacts associated with the change.

It should be noted that some of the design parameters identified in this report have been and will continue to be used in postclosure calculations and analyses but, at present, have no foreseeable application to design, construction, or operations. Such parameters are included in this report for completeness and for consistency between postclosure analyses and design, should the parameters be applied to design at some future time, and are identified as “information only.” The EG RAO may treat such parameters as information in the internal constraints allocation process.

Also, it is recognized that certain of the parameters presented in this report are based on the state of knowledge as of this writing. Ongoing testing, postclosure modeling and analysis, and design



evolution may establish new, reduced or expanded ranges of values of these parameters. Where the term ‘nominal’ is used, future efforts may define a range of values. (Proposed tolerances and ranges for selected parameters are presented in Section 7 of this report.) But until such time as these new values are established, the parameter values as currently defined remain in effect. Also, in some cases the current state of knowledge is so limited that the controlled internal design constraint, as presently defined, does not establish a sufficient basis for compliance with the internal constraint. Such internal constraints are to be allocated as applicable and implemented to the extent practical, with demonstration of compliance deferred until such time as a basis for compliance is established.

Controlled internal design constraints presented in this report are referenceable as internal design constraints within BSC and the Lead Laboratory. Controlled interface parameter values presented in this report are referenceable as direct input (but not as internal design constraints) within both BSC and the Lead Laboratory. Other information in this report is not intended for use as direct input, but this report may be useful in identifying or confirming the appropriate sources for such information.

1.4 LIMITATIONS ON USE

This report is not intended for use during construction, procurement, or fabrication.



2. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

2.1 BACKGROUND

The Monitored Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain is being developed as the nation’s first repository for disposal of high-level nuclear waste. The postclosure function of the repository is to isolate the waste from the public and the accessible environment. Multiple barriers consisting of natural barriers and an engineered barrier system (EBS) will perform the waste isolation function to meet the postclosure performance objectives established in 10 CFR 63.113 [DIRS 180319]. In accordance with 10 CFR 63.114 [DIRS 180319], postclosure performance of the repository will be demonstrated in a performance assessment.

The design of the EBS SSCs is a primary input to the analysis and model reports (AMRs) that support postclosure performance assessment of the repository. The design of EBS SSCs is defined by the design parameters, or attributes, associated with them. The term “design parameters” in this context includes functions and performance requirements allocated to SSCs through the design process, as well as the attributes of SSCs that are developed during design (e.g., dimensions; weight; materials; fabrication and quality-control processes; operating characteristics).

2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS

This report identifies the repository design parameters that have been used as direct inputs in AMRs or other scientific documents that support the postclosure performance assessment. A review of active Lead-Laboratory-owned documents was performed to identify the design parameters, using either of two different methods. The first method of identification was to review the screening decisions for each of the features, events, and processes (FEPs) that were considered for potential inclusion in the performance assessment. The second method of identification was to review the AMRs (and supporting calculations) in which conceptual models of the included FEPs were developed and documented.

2.2.1 Review of FEPs Screening Decisions

The final results of the FEP screening analyses are documented in a set of ten FEP analysis reports (collectively referred to as FEPs AMRs) (Development of the Total System Performance Assessment-License Application Features, Events, and Processes, BSC 2005 [DIRS 173800], Section 2.4.1). Each FEP is screened as either “included” in or “excluded” from postclosure performance assessment. For each included FEP, the AMR in which the FEP is addressed includes a disposition discussion that describes how the FEP is to be modeled in the performance assessment. For each excluded FEP, the AMR includes a screening argument for excluding the FEP from the performance assessment. (A FEP may be excluded based on low consequence or low probability, per criteria given at 10 CFR 63.342 [DIRS 180319], or by regulation per other provisions of 10 CFR 63, e.g., 10 CFR 63.305 (b) [DIRS 180319]).

A listing of all FEPs was prepared to document the review of FEP screening decisions. The appropriate discipline engineering managers (DEMs) from the Nuclear & Radiological, Civil/ Structural/Architectural, Systems Engineering, Thermal/Structural Analysis, and Mining



disciplines were assigned to review the screening decisions1 for a given FEP. These assignments were based on the relevance of each discipline to the particular characteristics of each FEP. Most of the DEMs assigned additional discipline engineers to support the review of their assigned FEPs. (The reviewers are identified as contributors to this report on the signature page.) Instructions for the review, listings of assigned FEPs, and the relevant screening decisions were provided to reviewers. Each reviewer first identified all statements in the FEP screening decisions in which features of the engineered barrier system and its components are mentioned. These statements were incorporated into the listing of FEPs as “applicable quotes” from the AMRs. Next, the applicable quotes were reviewed to determine if a quote implied an internal constraint and if additional action was needed to identify or clarify an internal constraint. If a quote implied an internal constraint, an internal constraint statement was derived from the quote. If the derived internal constraint did not specify a bounding value or a range of values for a parameter, actions necessary to refine the internal constraint statement were noted. Derived internal constraints and actions were documented in the listing of FEPs. The results of the screening decision reviews were then compiled. Questions or issues were noted and resolved with the reviewers and selected derived internal constraints and actions were then further refined. The compiled results were then redistributed to all reviewers for their concurrence. 2.2.2 Review of other Models, Analyses, and other Supporting Documents

The [BSC] Lead Laboratory Technical Interface Manager (a coauthor of this report) reviewed the other postclosure documents owned by the Lead Laboratory for the use of design parameters. The tabulation of inputs, the reference listing, and the Document Input Reference System (DIRS) Report for each document were reviewed to identify design parameters used as direct input. These data were compiled and DIRS Document and Input Status Links reports for information exchange documents (IEDs) were then used to crosscheck the results of the review of Lead Laboratory documents. Each use of a design parameter was then reviewed by referring to the specific statements in which the input was used. Each design parameter use was then correlated to the appropriate derived internal constraint(s) that had been developed from the review of FEPs screening decisions. If a statement that used a design parameter implied a new, previously unrecognized internal constraint, a new derived internal constraint was developed. Also, where so noted, derived internal constraint parameter values were developed as an agreed upon engineering-scientific interface constraint to address non-specific FEP discussions in a manner that can be incorporated into technical designs and verified through their implementation.

1 A substantial number of FEPs are addressed in more than one FEP AMR. The decision to include or exclude such a FEP is the same in all AMRs in which it is addressed. However, each individual screening decision addresses the particular characteristics of the FEP that are relevant to the topical area of that particular AMR. Therefore all FEP screening decisions were reviewed.



The results of these reviews were then compiled. The derived internal constraints were then categorized as internal design constraints or interface control parameters based on their relationship to excluded FEPs and to functions that are estimated to affect performance assessment results. Representative analyses from the FEPs AMRs and other AMRs were then selected as the postclosure bases for each derived internal constraint. Work-in-process records of the activities described in this section are available on compact disc within the Records Information Management System under Accession No. MOL.20070711.0514. Final results are presented in Section 6.



3. QUALITY ASSURANCE

The preparation, review, approval, and control of this document are in accordance with PA-PRO-0313, Technical Reports, and CC-PRO-2001, Technical Interface Control, and its review is also in accordance with PA-PRO-0601, Document Review. This report is an interface definition document as defined in CC-PRO-2001. As such, it is subject to the approval of the Engineering Manager, who is responsible for implementing the derived internal constraints presented herein in the design of the repository. This technical report is not associated with scientific investigation activities and is not required to have a technical work plan prepared in accordance with LP-2.29Q-BSC, Planning for Science Activities. This report contains information that will be used to design and analyze items that may be important to waste isolation. Therefore, this document is subject to the requirements of QA-DIR-10, Quality Management Directive, Sections 2.1.C.1.1.a.i and 17.E, and is designated as QA: QA.

This document is controlled as a Level 4 technical baseline document. This document was developed consistent with guidance given in CC-DIR-10, Configuration Management Program. The TMRB (the Level 4 change control authority) authorized this revision of this document in accordance with CC-PRO-1001, Technical Management Review Board Operations. Documents that are not part of the repository technical baseline (e.g., feasibility studies, sensitivity studies, tolerance development, etc.) may use parameters contrary to those found within this document. However, prior to incorporation within the technical baseline, such parameters must be reconciled with this document through an approved TMRB decision proposal.



4. USE OF SOFTWARE

No software requiring qualification in accordance with IT-PRO-0011, Software Management was used in the development of this report. Microsoft Excel was used to document work-in-process; however, its use was limited to the word processing capabilities of Excel (no computations performed). Therefore its use is not subject to the controls established in PA-PRO-0313.



5. INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS

5.1 INPUTS

Several document types were inputs to this report and were used to identify the design parameters that are relevant to the postclosure performance assessment. These inputs (parameters and their sources) are documented in the appropriate tables in Section 6. As previously discussed in Section 2, input sources include the features, events, and processes (FEP) screening decisions taken from the FEPs AMRs, the development of conceptual models for included FEPs taken from other AMRs, other supporting calculations, and information exchange documents.

5.2 ASSUMPTIONS

There are no assumptions made in this report. However, the bases of parameters presented in this report may have relied on assumptions that are described in the cited references.



6. POSTCLOSURE DESIGN PARAMETERS

The conclusions reached from the reviews of design parameter usage in postclosure models, analyses, and supporting documents are presented in Table 1. The results are grouped into the following categories based on the engineered system(s) and/or feature(s) to which each derived internal constraint applies:

1. Subsurface Facilities 2. Engineered Barrier System (EBS) In-Drift Configuration 3. Waste Package 4. Waste Form and Transport, Aging, and Disposal (TAD) Canister 5. Emplacement and Retrieval 6. Subsurface Ventilation 7. Drip Shield 8. Emplacement Pallet 9. Closure

Each row of the table includes one unique derived internal constraint. Within each category, rows are numbered sequentially for identification. Controlled interface parameters are identified as such, and the mechanism (e.g., the IED) for controlling the value or ranges of values for the interface parameter is identified. Parameters that have no applicability to design (i.e., that are only informative regarding the bases for postclosure analyses) are identified as “Information Only.” Some derived internal constraints apply to multiple categories and are repeated for each category to which they apply. The key uses of the design parameters that are controlled by an internal constraint are listed adjacent to the internal constraint in the Postclosure Basis column. Taken together, these uses constitute the bases of the internal constraint. Parameters with a limited basis that are subject to future refinement are identified by inclusion of appropriate clarifying statements in the Postclosure Basis column.

Common acronyms used in Table 1 are defined in the list of acronyms contained in the front matter of this report. Less-common acronyms are also defined where used in the table.


Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers Ta

ble

1. P

ostc

losu

re D

esig

n P

aram

eter

s

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

SUB

SUR

FAC

E FA

CIL

ITIE

S 01

-01

Rep

osito

ry

Geo

grap

hic

and

Geo

logi

c Lo

catio

n [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

s fo

r the

lo

catio

n of

the

subs

urfa

ce fa

cilit

ies

of th

e re

posi

tory

with

in th

e fo

otpr

int o

f em

plac

emen

t are

a bo

unda

ry a

nd th

e re

posi

tory

hos

t hor

izon

(RH

H) w

ithin

the

litho

stra

tigra

phic

det

ail a

re th

e S

ubsu

rface

Fa

cilit

ies

Layo

ut G

eogr

aphi

cal D

ata

IED

(s)

and

Geo

tech

nica

l and

The

rmal

Par

amet

ers

IED

s.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.2

.08.

01.0

A –

Che

mic

al c

hara

cter

istic

s of

gr

ound

wat

er in

the

SZ

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

0],

Sec

tion

6.2.

25);

x� F

EP

2.2

.08.

12.0

A –

Che

mis

try o

f wat

er fl

owin

g in

to th

e dr

ift (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

32);

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D S

ubsu

rface

Fac

ilitie

s La

yout

Geo

grap

hica

l Dat

a (B

SC

200

7 [D

IRS

179

927]

). x�

IED

Geo

tech

nica

l and

The

rmal

Par

amet

ers

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

7992

8])

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 16

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-0

2 R

epos

itory

Lay

out

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s]

gene

ral l

ayou

t and

con

figur

atio

n of

the

subs

urfa

ce fa

cilit

ies,

incl

udin

g sh

afts

, po

rtals

, ram

ps, m

ains

, em

plac

emen

t drif

ts,

obse

rvat

ion

drift

s, a

nd o

ther

sub

surfa

ce

feat

ures

, and

was

te p

acka

ge n

omin

al

x� F

EP

1.2

.04.

03.0

A –

Igne

ous

intru

sion

into

repo

sito

ry

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7398

1], S

ectio

n 6.

2.2.

2);

x� F

EP

1.2

.06.

00.0

A –

Hyd

roth

erm

al a

ctiv

ity (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.8.

2);

endp

oint

coo

rdin

ates

, ele

vatio

ns, a

nd

avai

labl

e dr

ift le

ngth

s is

the

Sub

surfa

ce

Faci

litie

s La

yout

Geo

grap

hica

l Dat

a IE

D(s

).

x� F

EP

2.1

.14.

19.0

A –

In-p

acka

ge c

ritic

ality

resu

lting

fro

m a

sei

smic

eve

nt (d

egra

ded

conf

igur

atio

ns) (

BS

C

2004

[DIR

S 1

6855

6], S

ectio

n 6.

8.6)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

4.16

.0A

– In

-pac

kage

crit

ical

ity (d

egra

ded

conf

igur

atio

ns) (

BSC

200

4 [D

IRS

168

556]

, S

ectio

n 6.

8.2)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

3.02

.0A

– R

adia

tion

dam

age

in E

BS

(BS

C

2004

[DIR

S 1

7002

0], S

ectio

n 6.

2.38

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

3.02

.0A

– R

adia

tion

dam

age

in E

BS

(BS

C

2005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.82

); x�

Drif

t Deg

rada

tion

Ana

lysi

s, S

ectio

n 6.

2 (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

166

107]

); x�

FE

P 1

.5.0

1.01

.0A

– M

eteo

rite

impa

ct (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

021]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

4.5)

. C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

x� IE

D S

ubsu

rface

Fac

ilitie

s La

yout

Geo

grap

hica

l Dat

a (B

SC

200

7 [D

IRS

179

927]

).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 17

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-0

3 R

epos

itory

Geo

logi

c Th

e in

terfa

ce c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm fo

r the

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Loca

tion

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce P

aram

eter

s]

repo

sito

ry a

reas

, em

plac

emen

t are

a by

ge

olog

ic u

nit,

faul

t int

erse

ctio

n co

ordi

nate

s,

and

bore

hole

loca

tions

is th

e S

ubsu

rface

x�

FE

P 2

.2.0

6.03

.0A

– S

eism

ic a

ctiv

ity a

lters

per

ched

w

ater

zon

es (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Fa

cilit

ies

Geo

logi

cal D

ata

IED

. S

ectio

n 6.

8.8)

; x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

1.01

.0A

– O

pen

site

inve

stig

atio

n bo

reho

les

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

3.1)

; x�

FE

P1.

2.02

.03.

0A –

Fau

lt di

spla

cem

ent d

amag

es E

BS

co

mpo

nent

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

2);

x� F

EP

2.1

.14.

15.0

A –

In-p

acka

ge c

ritic

ality

(int

act

conf

igur

atio

n) (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

168

556]

, S

ectio

n 6.

8.1)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

4.18

.0A

– In

-pac

kage

crit

ical

ity re

sulti

ng

fro

m a

sei

smic

eve

nt (i

ntac

t con

figur

atio

n) (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

168

556]

, Sec

tion

6.8.

5);

x� F

EP

2.1

.14.

19.0

A –

In-p

acka

ge c

ritic

ality

resu

lting

fro

m a

sei

smic

eve

nt (d

egra

ded

conf

igur

atio

ns) (

BS

C

2004

[DIR

S 1

6855

6], S

ectio

n 6.

8.6)

; x�

FEP

2.1

.14.

20.0

A –

Nea

r-fie

ld c

ritic

ality

resu

lting

from

a

seis

mic

eve

nt (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

168

556]

, S

ectio

n 6.

8.7)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

4.21

.0A

– In

-pac

kage

crit

ical

ity re

sulti

ng

from

rock

fall

(inta

ct c

onfig

urat

ion)

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S

1685

56],

Sec

tion

6.8.

9);

x� F

EP

2.1

.14.

22.0

A –

In-p

acka

ge c

ritic

ality

resu

lting

fro

m ro

ck fa

ll (d

egra

ded

conf

igur

atio

n) (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

168

556]

, Sec

tion

6.8.

10);

x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

4.23

.0A

– N

ear-f

ield

crit

ical

ity re

sulti

ng fr

om

rock

fall

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

6855

6], S

ectio

n 6.

8.11

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

4.24

.0A

– In

-pac

kage

crit

ical

ity re

sulti

ng

from

an

Igne

ous

even

t (in

tact

con

figur

atio

n) (B

SC

2004

[DIR

S 1

6855

6], S

ectio

n 6.

8.13

);

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 18

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01

-03

Rep

osito

ry G

eolo

gic

x� F

EP

2.1

.14.

25.0

A –

In-p

acka

ge c

ritic

ality

resu

lting

(C

ontin

ued)

Lo

catio

n [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

Par

amet

ers]

fro

m a

n Ig

neou

s ev

ent (

degr

aded

con

figur

atio

n) (B

SC

20

04 [D

IRS

168

556]

, Sec

tion

6.8.

14);

x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

4.26

.0A

– N

ear-f

ield

crit

ical

ity re

sulti

ng fr

om

an Ig

neou

s ev

ent (

BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

6855

6],

Sec

tion

6.8.

15);

x� F

EP

2.2

.14.

10.0

A –

Far

-fiel

d cr

itica

lity

resu

lting

from

a

seis

mic

eve

nt (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

168

556]

, S

ectio

n 6.

8.8)

; x�

FE

P 2

.2.1

4.11

.0A

– F

ar-fi

eld

criti

calit

y re

sulti

ng fr

om

rock

fall

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

6855

6], S

ectio

n 6.

8.12

); x�

FE

P 2

.2.1

4.12

.0A

– F

ar-fi

eld

criti

calit

y re

sulti

ng fr

om

an ig

neou

s ev

ent (

BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

6855

6],

Sec

tion

6.8.

16).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D S

ubsu

rface

Fac

ilitie

s G

eolo

gica

l Dat

a (B

SC

200

7 [D

IRS

182

926]

).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 19

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-0

4 R

epos

itory

Ele

vatio

n –

The

base

of t

he e

mpl

acem

ent d

rifts

sha

ll be

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Sta

ndof

f fro

m W

ater

Ta

ble

loca

ted

at le

ast 1

20 m

abo

ve th

e m

axim

um

elev

atio

n of

the

pres

ent-d

ay w

ater

tabl

e.

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

01.0

B –

Effe

cts

of ra

pid

influ

x in

to th

e re

posi

tory

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.33

); N

ote:

Bas

ed o

n its

cur

rent

loca

tion,

the

max

imum

ele

vatio

n of

the

pres

ent-d

ay w

ater

ta

ble

bene

ath

the

empl

acem

ent a

rea

is

~850

m a

bove

sea

leve

l. Th

us th

e m

inim

um

elev

atio

n of

the

base

of t

he e

mpl

acem

ent

drift

s sh

all b

e 97

0 m

abo

ve s

ea le

vel.

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

09.0

A –

Sat

urat

ed F

low

in th

e E

BS

(BS

C

2005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.40

); x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

2.00

.0A

– C

hem

ical

effe

cts

of e

xcav

atio

n an

d co

nstru

ctio

n in

EB

S (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.04

.0A

– H

ydro

stat

ic p

ress

ure

on W

aste

P

acka

ge (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

30);

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.04

.0B

– H

ydro

stat

ic p

ress

ure

on D

rip

Shi

eld

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.31

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

8.12

.0A

– In

duce

d hy

drol

ogic

cha

nges

in

inve

rt (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

42);

x� U

nder

grou

nd L

ayou

t Con

figur

atio

n (B

SC 2

003

[DIR

S

1655

72],

Sec

tion

7.1.

1).

01-0

5 R

epos

itory

Sta

ndof

f fro

m Q

uate

rnar

y Fa

ult

The

empl

acem

ent d

rifts

sha

ll be

loca

ted

a m

inim

um o

f 60

m fr

om a

Qua

tern

ary

faul

t w

ith p

oten

tial f

or s

igni

fican

t dis

plac

emen

t.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

1.2

.02.

03.0

A –

Fau

lt di

spla

cem

ent d

amag

es E

BS

co

mpo

nent

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

2).

20 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-0

6 R

epos

itory

Ele

vatio

n –

The

over

burd

en th

ickn

ess

(i.e.

, the

dis

tanc

e R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Ove

rbur

den

Thic

knes

s fro

m th

e to

p of

eac

h em

plac

emen

t drif

t to

the

topo

grap

hic

surfa

ce) s

hall

be a

min

imum

of

200

m.

x� F

EP

1.2

.02.

03.0

A –

Fau

lt di

spla

cem

ent d

amag

es E

BS

co

mpo

nent

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

2);

x�

FE

P 1

.2.0

4.05

.0A

– M

agm

a or

pyr

ocla

stic

bas

e su

rge

trans

ports

was

te (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.2.

6);

x� F

EP

1.4

.11.

00.0

A –

Exp

losi

ons

and

cras

hes

(Hum

an

Act

iviti

es) (

BSC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

021]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

3.9)

; x�

FE

P 1

.5.0

1.01

.0A

– M

eteo

rite

impa

ct (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

021]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

4.5)

; x�

FE

P 2

.3.0

9.01

.0A

– A

nim

al b

urro

win

g/in

trusi

on (B

SC

20

05 [D

IRS

174

107]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

23).

01-0

7 R

epos

itory

Sta

ndof

f Th

e em

plac

emen

t drif

ts s

hall

be lo

cate

d a

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

: fro

m P

erch

ed W

ater

m

inim

um o

f 30

m fr

om th

e to

p of

the

Tptp

v2

(Top

opah

Spr

ing

Tuff

Cry

stal

-poo

r Vitr

ic

Zone

) bec

ause

per

ched

wat

er m

ay o

ccur

at

the

base

of t

he T

opop

ah S

prin

g Tu

ff U

nit.

x� F

EP

2.2

.06.

03.0

A –

Sei

smic

act

ivity

alte

rs p

erch

ed

wat

er z

ones

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1],

Sec

tion

6.8.

8).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

21 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-0

8 O

rient

atio

n of

E

mpl

acem

ent D

rifts

The

empl

acem

ent d

rifts

will

be n

omin

ally

pa

ralle

l. Th

e de

sign

azi

mut

h sh

all b

e th

e sa

me

for a

ll em

plac

emen

t drif

ts, a

nd s

hall

be w

ithin

a ra

nge

of 7

0o to

80o .

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x�

D

rift D

egra

datio

n A

naly

sis,

Sec

tion

6.3.

1.1

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

6610

7]);

x� N

umbe

r of W

aste

Pac

kage

s H

it by

Igne

ous

Eve

nts,

Sec

tion

4.1

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

177

432]

); x�

TB

V-3

61 R

esol

utio

n A

naly

sis:

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t O

rient

atio

n (C

RW

MS

M&O

199

9 [D

IRS

115

042]

S

ectio

n 7)

.

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

01

-09

Exc

avat

ion

Met

hods

Th

e re

posi

tory

ram

ps, a

cces

s m

ains

, ex

haus

t mai

ns, a

nd e

mpl

acem

ent d

rifts

sha

ll be

con

stru

cted

by

tunn

el b

orin

g m

achi

nes

(TB

M).

The

star

ter t

unne

l to

supp

ort e

ach

uniq

ue T

BM

adv

ance

sha

ll be

exc

avat

ed b

y bl

astin

g or

mec

hani

cal e

xcav

atio

n m

etho

ds.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

1.1

.02.

00.0

A –

Che

mic

al e

ffect

s of

exc

avat

ion

and

cons

truct

ion

in E

BS

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

1);

x� F

EP

1.1

.02.

00.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal e

ffect

s of

exc

avat

ion

and

cons

truct

ion

in E

BS

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

2).

01-1

0

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t C

onfig

urat

ion

The

empl

acem

ent d

rift e

xcav

atio

ns s

hall

be

circ

ular

in c

ross

sec

tion

with

a n

omin

al

diam

eter

of 5

.5 m

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

01.0

A –

Roc

kfal

l (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

4995

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.22

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.01

.0A

– R

ockf

all (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1750

14],

Sec

tion

6.2.

28);

x� F

EP

2.2

.06.

04.0

A –

Effe

cts

of s

ubsi

denc

e (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

5.4)

; x�

Drif

t Deg

rada

tion

Ana

lysi

s, S

ectio

n 6.

3.1.

1(B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

166

107]

).

22 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-1

1

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t G

radi

ent

The

grad

e of

the

empl

acem

ent d

rift s

hall

be

nom

inal

ly h

oriz

onta

l so

that

ove

rall

wat

er

drai

nage

is d

irect

ly in

to th

e ro

ck to

pre

vent

w

ater

acc

umul

atio

n.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

12.0

A –

Indu

ced

hydr

olog

ic c

hang

es in

in

vert

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.42

).

01-1

2 N

on-E

mpl

acem

ent

Ope

ning

Gra

dien

t Th

e re

posi

tory

non

-em

plac

emen

t ope

ning

s sh

all p

rovi

de a

repo

sito

ry g

rade

so

over

all

wat

er d

rain

age

and

accu

mul

atio

n is

aw

ay

from

em

plac

emen

t are

as.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

12.0

A –

Indu

ced

hydr

olog

ic c

hang

es in

in

vert

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.42

).

01-1

3

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t S

paci

ng

The

subs

urfa

ce fa

cilit

y sh

all b

e de

sign

ed to

lo

cate

the

empl

acem

ent d

rifts

nom

inal

ly

81 m

apa

rt to

pre

vent

ther

mal

inte

ract

ion

betw

een

adja

cent

drif

ts a

nd to

allo

w

drai

nage

of t

herm

ally

mob

ilized

wat

er w

ithin

th

e ro

ck p

illars

to p

erco

late

pas

t the

drif

ts.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.2

.10.

01.0

A –

Rep

osito

ry-in

duce

d th

erm

al

effe

cts

on fl

ow in

the

UZ

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1],

Sec

tion

6.9.

9).

01-1

4 V

erifi

catio

n of

Des

ign

Roc

k P

rope

rties

Th

e em

plac

emen

t ope

ning

s sh

all p

rovi

de fo

r po

st-e

xcav

atio

n in

vest

igat

ions

of e

ach

drift

th

at w

ill be

con

duct

ed u

nder

the

P

erfo

rman

ce C

onfir

mat

ion

Pro

gram

. The

ob

ject

ive

of p

ost-e

xcav

atio

n in

vest

igat

ions

is

to v

erify

that

hos

t roc

k pr

oper

ties

are

boun

ded

by th

e ro

ck p

rope

rties

des

crib

ed

with

in th

e in

situ

obs

erva

tions

and

mod

el

assu

mpt

ions

use

d in

pos

tclo

sure

ana

lyse

s.

Pos

t-exc

avat

ion

inve

stig

atio

ns w

ill in

clud

e ge

olog

ic m

appi

ng to

con

firm

that

frac

ture

ge

omet

ric v

aria

bilit

y an

d in

itial

rock

pr

oper

ties

are

with

in th

e m

odel

inpu

t pa

ram

eter

rang

e us

ed in

rock

fall

calc

ulat

ions

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

01.0

A –

Roc

kfal

l (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

4995

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.22

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.01

.0A

– R

ockf

all (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1750

14],

Sec

tion

6.2.

28).

23 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01

-15

Des

ign

of G

roun

d Th

e in

terfa

ce c

ontro

l mec

hani

sms

for t

he

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: S

uppo

rt S

yste

m

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce

Par

amet

ers]

desi

gn a

nd m

ater

ials

use

d fo

r gro

und

supp

ort a

re t

he S

ubsu

rface

Fac

ilitie

s G

roun

d S

uppo

rt C

onfig

urat

ion

and

Sub

surfa

ce F

acilit

ies

Com

mitt

ed M

ater

ials

IE

Ds.

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

01.0

A –

Roc

kfal

l (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

4995

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.22

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.01

.0A

– R

ockf

all (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1750

14],

Sec

tion

6.2.

28);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

01.0

A –

Che

mic

al e

ffect

s of

rock

re

info

rcem

ent a

nd c

emen

titio

us m

ater

ials

in E

BS

(BS

C

2005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.18

);

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

02.0

A –

Drif

t col

laps

e (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

5014

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.29

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.03

.0A

– E

xoth

erm

ic re

actio

ns in

the

EB

S

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7002

0], S

ectio

n 6.

2.32

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.03

.0A

– E

xoth

erm

ic re

actio

ns in

the

EB

S

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.68

); x�

FE

P 2

.2.0

8.03

.0B

– G

eote

chni

cal i

nter

actio

ns a

nd

evol

utio

n in

the

UZ

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, S

ectio

n 6.

9.7)

. C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

x� IE

D S

ubsu

rface

Fac

ilitie

s G

roun

d S

uppo

rt C

onfig

urat

ion

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8292

7]).

x� IE

D S

ubsu

rface

Fac

ilitie

s C

omm

itted

Mat

eria

ls (B

SC

20

07 [D

IRS

180

940]

).

01-1

6 A

ir C

ircul

atio

n th

roug

h G

roun

d S

uppo

rt Th

e pe

rman

ent g

roun

d su

ppor

t sha

ll be

pe

rfora

ted

to a

llow

air

circ

ulat

ion

betw

een

the

host

rock

and

the

in-d

rift e

nviro

nmen

t.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

04.0

A –

Flo

w th

roug

h ro

ck re

info

rcem

ent

mat

eria

ls in

EB

S (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.20

).

24 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-1

7

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t Th

e un

faile

d em

plac

emen

t drif

t gro

und

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: G

roun

d S

uppo

rt

supp

ort s

yste

m s

hall

prev

ent r

avel

ing

or

rock

fall

durin

g pr

eclo

sure

in th

e em

plac

emen

t drif

ts th

at c

ould

indu

ce

resi

dual

tens

ile s

tress

es in

the

was

te

pack

age

abov

e 25

7 M

Pa.

In

the

even

t the

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

A –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of w

aste

pac

kage

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

15);

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

01.0

A –

Roc

kfal

l (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

4995

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.22

); gr

ound

sup

port

syst

em fa

ils, t

he w

aste

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.01

.0A

– R

ockf

all (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

pack

ages

that

hav

e co

me

into

con

tact

with

17

5014

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.28

).

falle

n ro

ck o

r gro

und

supp

ort m

ater

ials

sha

ll be

insp

ecte

d fo

r sur

face

dam

age

and

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

rem

edia

ted

as re

quire

d pr

ior t

o cl

osur

e.

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

01-1

8 U

nhea

ted

Drif

t Len

gth

A

s bo

unda

ry c

ondi

tions

for t

he th

erm

oR

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

hydr

olog

ic m

odel

in th

e po

stcl

osur

e, in

the

even

t tha

t acc

ess

mai

n an

d ex

haus

t mai

n dr

ifts

are

back

fille

d, a

reas

at b

oth

ends

of

the

empl

aced

was

te w

ill be

free

of b

ackf

ill.

The

two

area

s w

ill ea

ch b

e a

min

imum

of 1

5 m

long

and

thei

r com

bine

d le

ngth

will

tota

l a

min

imum

of 7

5 m

.

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

04.0

A –

Con

dens

atio

n fo

rms

on ro

ofs

of

drift

s (d

rift-s

cale

col

d tra

ps) (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

35);

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

04.0

B –

Con

dens

atio

n fo

rms

at re

posi

tory

ed

ges

(rep

osito

ry-s

cale

col

d tra

ps) (

BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

5014

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.36

); N

ote:

Em

plac

emen

t are

as w

ill no

t be

x� In

-Drif

t Nat

ural

Con

vect

ion

and

Con

dens

atio

n,

back

fille

d (s

ee P

aram

eter

05-

04).

Sec

tion

6.3.

3.1

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

181

648]

).

25 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

01-1

9 Fl

ood

Pro

tect

ion

The

porta

l and

sha

ft co

llar l

ocat

ions

sha

ll be

si

tuat

ed s

uch

that

they

can

be

prot

ecte

d fro

m w

ater

inflo

w a

s a

resu

lt of

the

prob

able

m

axim

um fl

ood.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

1.1

.02.

01.0

A –

Site

floo

ding

(dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

and

oper

atio

n) (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, S

ectio

n 6.

3.3)

; x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

4.01

.0A

– In

com

plet

e cl

osur

e (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.3.

4);

x� F

EP

2.1

.05.

02.0

A –

Rad

ionu

clid

e tra

nspo

rt th

roug

h se

als

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

3.7)

.

01

-20

Rep

osito

ry S

tand

off

from

Pai

ntbr

ush

Non

wel

ded

Hyd

roge

olog

ic U

nit

The

min

imum

dis

tanc

e be

twee

n th

e to

p of

ea

ch e

mpl

acem

ent d

rift a

nd th

e ba

se o

f the

P

aint

brus

h no

nwel

ded

hydr

ogeo

logi

c un

it sh

all b

e 10

0 m

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x�

FE

P 2

.2.1

0.05

.0A

– T

herm

o-m

echa

nica

l stre

sses

alte

r ch

arac

teris

tics

of ro

cks

abov

e an

d be

low

the

repo

sito

ry (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.9.

12);

x� M

ount

ain-

Sca

le C

oupl

ed P

roce

sses

(TH

/TH

C/T

HM

) M

odel

s, S

ectio

ns 6

.3.1

and

6.3

.1.1

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1741

01]).

01

-21

Min

imum

Thi

ckne

ss o

f th

e P

aint

brus

h N

onw

elde

d H

ydro

geol

ogic

Uni

t ab

ove

the

Rep

osito

ry

The

min

imum

thic

knes

s of

the

Pai

ntbr

ush

nonw

elde

d hy

drog

eolo

gic

unit

abov

e th

e re

posi

tory

sha

ll be

10

m.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.2

.07.

05.0

A –

Flo

w in

the

UZ

from

epi

sodi

c in

filtra

tion

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

4.5)

.

01

-22

Rep

osito

ry S

tand

off

from

Cal

ico

Hills

N

onw

elde

d H

ydro

geol

ogic

Uni

t

The

min

imum

dis

tanc

e be

twee

n th

e ba

se o

f ea

ch e

mpl

acem

ent d

rift a

nd th

e to

p of

the

Cal

ico

Hills

non

wel

ded

hydr

ogeo

logi

c un

it

shal

l be

60 m

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.2

.10.

14.0

A –

Min

eral

ogic

deh

ydra

tion

reac

tions

(B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.9.

16);

x� M

ount

ain-

Sca

le C

oupl

ed P

roce

sses

(TH

/TH

C/T

HM

) M

odel

s, S

ectio

ns 6

.3.1

and

6.3

.1.1

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1741

01]).

26 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

EBS

IN-D

RIF

T C

ON

FIG

UR

ATI

ON

02

-01

A

s-E

mpl

aced

Was

te

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: C

onfig

urat

ion

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce

Par

amet

ers]

empl

aced

was

te p

acka

ges

shal

l be

the

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t Con

figur

atio

n an

d E

nviro

nmen

t IE

D.

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

A –

Sei

smic

gro

und

mot

ion

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

3);

x� F

EP

2.1

.09.

09.0

A –

Ele

ctro

chem

ical

effe

cts

in E

BS

(B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

26);

x� F

EP

2.1

.09.

09.0

A –

Ele

ctro

chem

ical

effe

cts

in E

BS

(B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

019]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

20);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal d

egra

datio

n of

inve

rt (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

22).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift C

onfig

urat

ion

and

Env

ironm

ent

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8041

2]).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 27

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

02-0

2

As-

Em

plac

ed W

aste

Th

e in

terfa

ce c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm fo

r the

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Pac

kage

-Drip

Shi

eld

Con

figur

atio

n [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s]

min

imum

dis

tanc

e fro

m to

p-of

-was

te

pack

age

to in

terio

r-hei

ght-o

f-drip

-shi

eld

is

the

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t Con

figur

atio

n an

d E

nviro

nmen

t IE

D(s

).

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

A –

Sei

smic

gro

und

mot

ion

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

3);

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

B –

Sei

smic

-indu

ced

rock

fall

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.07

.0B

– M

echa

nica

l im

pact

on

drip

shi

eld

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.14

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.01

.0A

– R

ockf

all (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1749

95],

Sec

tion

6.2.

22);

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

01.0

A –

Roc

kfal

l (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

5014

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.28

). C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

x� IE

D E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift C

onfig

urat

ion

and

Env

ironm

ent

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8041

2]).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 28

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

02-0

3 C

omm

itted

Mat

eria

ls

D

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

n of

the

empl

acem

ent

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s –

Item

e)

only

]

drift

s, a

nd o

pera

tion

and

clos

ure

of th

e re

posi

tory

, adm

inis

trativ

e co

ntro

ls w

ill be

im

pose

d to

pre

vent

impa

ct o

n w

aste

is

olat

ion

from

mat

eria

ls u

sed,

lost

, or l

eft i

n th

e re

posi

tory

. Th

ese

cont

rols

will

be

supp

orte

d by

tech

nica

l eva

luat

ion.

x� F

EP

1.1

.02.

00.0

A –

Che

mic

al e

ffect

s of

exc

avat

ion

and

cons

truct

ion

in E

BS

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

1);

x� F

EP

1.1

.02.

03.0

A –

Und

esira

ble

mat

eria

ls le

ft (B

SC

20

05 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

4);

The

follo

win

g co

nstra

ints

will

be im

pose

d on

th

e ad

min

istra

tive

cont

rol o

f TFM

s,

cons

truct

ion

mat

eria

ls a

nd c

omm

itted

m

ater

ials

: a)

All

mat

eria

l not

tech

nica

lly e

valu

ated

and

de

term

ined

acc

epta

ble

prio

r to

the

perm

anen

t clo

sure

of t

he re

posi

tory

will

be

rem

oved

from

sub

surfa

ce fa

cilit

ies

prio

r to

perm

anen

t clo

sure

. b)

Com

mitt

ed m

ater

ials

that

are

pro

pose

d to

re

mai

n in

the

unde

rgro

und

repo

sito

ry

follo

win

g pe

rman

ent c

losu

re p

erio

d w

ill be

te

chni

cally

eva

luat

ed a

nd d

eter

min

ed

acce

ptab

le p

rior t

o us

e.

c) A

dmin

istra

tive

cont

rols

will

incl

ude

acco

untin

g an

d in

spec

tion,

as

appr

opria

te to

co

nfirm

that

con

trols

on

the

appr

oved

TFM

qu

antit

ies

and

com

posi

tions

are

met

. d)

Con

cret

e du

st g

ener

atio

n sh

all b

e ke

pt to

a

min

imum

thro

ugh

the

use

of s

urfa

ce

coat

ings

and

/ or

the

use

of d

ust

supp

ress

ion

and

vent

ilatio

n co

ntro

l dur

ing

conc

rete

inst

alla

tion

and

/ or r

emov

al.

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

01.0

A –

Che

mic

al e

ffect

s of

rock

re

info

rcem

ent a

nd c

emen

titio

us m

ater

ials

in E

BS

(BS

C

2005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.18

);

x� F

EP

2.1

.09.

01.0

A –

Che

mic

al c

hara

cter

istic

s of

wat

er

in d

rifts

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.45

); x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

3.01

.0B

– E

rror i

n ba

ckfil

l em

plac

emen

t (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

6);

x� F

EP

2.1

.04.

01.0

A –

Flo

w in

the

back

fill (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.12

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

4.02

.0A

– C

hem

ical

pro

perti

es a

nd e

volu

tion

of b

ackf

ill (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

13);

x� F

EP

2.1

.04.

03.0

A –

Ero

sion

or d

isso

lutio

n of

bac

kfill

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.14

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

4.04

.0A

– T

herm

al-m

echa

nica

l effe

cts

of

back

fill (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.15

); x�

FE

P 2

.2.0

1.01

.0B

– C

hem

ical

effe

cts

of e

xcav

atio

n an

d co

nstru

ctio

n in

the

near

-fiel

d (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S

1741

91],

Sec

tion

6.9.

2);

x� F

EP

2.2

.01.

02.0

B –

Che

mic

al c

hang

es in

the

near

-fie

ld fr

om b

ackf

ill (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.85

); x�

FE

P 2

.2.0

8.03

.0B

– G

eote

chni

cal i

nter

actio

ns a

nd

evol

utio

n in

the

UZ

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, S

ectio

n 6.

9.7)

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

9.28

.0A

- Lo

caliz

ed C

orro

sion

on

Was

te

Pac

kage

Out

er S

urfa

ce d

ue to

Del

ique

scen

ce (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5] S

ectio

n 6.

2.18

); x�

Ana

lysi

s of

Dus

t Del

ique

scen

ce fo

r FE

P S

cree

ning

(S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

8126

7]),

Add

endu

m 1

, Sec

tion

6.1.

3[a]

.

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 29

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

02

-03

Com

mitt

ed M

ater

ials

e)

Var

ious

IED

(s) l

ist m

ater

ials

whi

ch a

re

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

s:

(con

tinue

d)

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce

Par

amet

ers

– Ite

m e

) on

ly]

inte

nded

to b

e pr

esen

t in

the

repo

sito

ry a

t cl

osur

e, a

nd w

hich

hav

e be

en fo

und

to b

e ac

cept

able

by

anal

ysis

. All

trace

rs, f

luid

s,

an

d m

ater

ials

(TFM

s) th

at m

ay b

e us

ed

durin

g co

nstru

ctio

n, o

pera

tion,

or c

losu

re,

will

be c

ontro

lled.

An

hist

oric

al

sum

mar

izat

ion

of T

FM q

uant

ities

that

hav

e be

en a

ppro

ved

for u

se is

list

ed in

the

TFM

ID

D(s

).

x�IE

D S

ubsu

rface

Fac

ilitie

s G

roun

d S

uppo

rt C

omm

itted

M

ater

ials

(BSC

200

7 [D

IRS

180

940]

); x�

IED

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t Inv

ert (

BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S

1827

46]);

x�

IED

Inte

rlock

ing

Drip

Shi

eld

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S

1804

44]);

x�

IED

Em

plac

emen

t Pal

let (

BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8044

5]);

x�IE

D W

aste

Pac

kage

Con

figur

atio

n (B

SC 2

007

[DIR

S

1829

28]).

02-0

4 In

vert

and

EB

S

The

inve

rt an

d E

BS

com

pone

nts

shal

l be

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: C

ompo

nent

s in

Situ

S

tress

and

The

rmal

R

espo

nse

desi

gned

to a

ccom

mod

ate

at le

ast a

10

mm

di

spla

cem

ent t

o ac

coun

t for

pot

entia

l in

situ

st

ress

and

ther

mal

resp

onse

. x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

6.05

.0B

– M

echa

nica

l deg

rada

tion

of in

vert

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.22

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

9.03

.0C

– V

olum

e in

crea

se o

f cor

rosi

on

prod

ucts

impa

cts

othe

r EBS

com

pone

nts

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.47

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.07

.0A

– T

herm

al e

xpan

sion

/stre

ss o

f in-

drift

EB

S c

ompo

nent

s (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

69);

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

07.0

A –

The

rmal

exp

ansi

on/s

tress

of i

n-dr

ift E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.29

). N

ote:

Thi

s de

rived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int s

tate

men

t has

be

en d

evel

oped

as

an a

gree

d up

on e

ngin

eerin

g-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat c

an b

e in

corp

orat

ed

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

30 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

02-0

5 E

BS

In-D

rift M

ater

ials

In

tera

ctio

ns

EB

S m

ater

ials

sha

ll be

iner

t rel

ativ

e to

eac

h ot

her s

o th

at p

hysi

cal c

onta

ct b

etw

een

EB

S

mat

eria

ls m

inim

izes

dis

sim

ilar m

ater

ial

inte

ract

ion

mec

hani

sms.

The

was

te p

acka

ge

oute

r cor

rosi

on b

arrie

r sha

ll no

t con

tact

EB

S

com

pone

nts

othe

r tha

n th

e A

lloy

22 s

uppo

rt su

rface

s of

the

palle

t.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

04.0

A –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of w

aste

pa

ckag

es (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

8);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

04.0

B –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of d

rip s

hiel

ds

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; x�

FEP

2.1

.06.

07.0

A –

Che

mic

al e

ffect

s

at E

BS

co

mpo

nent

inte

rface

s (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

26);

02-0

6 E

BS

Mat

eria

l In

tera

ctio

ns –

Cop

per

For t

he a

s-em

plac

ed c

onfig

urat

ion,

the

drip

sh

ield

s an

d w

aste

pac

kage

s sh

all n

ot

cont

act a

ny c

oppe

r tha

t may

be

pres

ent i

n ot

her E

BS

com

pone

nts

such

as

parts

of t

he

empl

acem

ent v

ehic

le ra

il sy

stem

. The

tota

l m

ass

of e

lem

enta

l cop

per p

er m

eter

of

empl

acem

ent d

rift s

hall

be le

ss th

an 5

.0

kg/m

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

09.0

A –

Cop

per c

orro

sion

in E

BS

(BS

C

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.17

);

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat c

an b

e in

corp

orat

ed

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

02-0

7 E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift

Inve

rt Fu

nctio

n Th

e em

plac

emen

t drif

t inv

ert (

balla

st) s

hall

prov

ide

a no

min

ally

leve

l sur

face

that

su

ppor

ts th

e dr

ip s

hiel

d, w

aste

pac

kage

, an

d w

aste

pac

kage

em

plac

emen

t pal

let f

or

stat

ic lo

ads

and

that

lim

its d

egra

datio

n as

soci

ated

with

gro

und

mot

ion

(but

ex

clud

ing

faul

ting

disp

lace

men

ts) a

fter

clos

ure

of th

e re

posi

tory

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal d

egra

datio

n of

inve

rt (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

22).

Not

e: T

he p

ortio

n of

this

der

ived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int

stat

emen

t reg

ardi

ng li

miti

ng d

egra

datio

n ha

s be

en

deve

lope

d as

an

agre

ed u

pon

engi

neer

ing-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

di

scus

sion

s in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

into

te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

31 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

02-0

8 In

vert

Mat

eria

ls

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce

Par

amet

ers

– Ite

m a

) on

ly]

a) T

he in

terfa

ce c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm fo

r the

co

mpo

nent

s an

d m

ater

ials

use

d in

the

inve

rt an

d fo

r the

gra

datio

n an

d pl

acem

ent o

f the

in

vert

balla

st m

ater

ial i

s th

e E

mpl

acem

ent

Drif

t Inv

ert I

ED

(s).

b) T

he in

vert

mat

eria

l will

be c

arbo

n st

eel

and

crus

hed

tuff.

The

cru

shed

tuff

shal

l hav

e pr

oper

ties

cons

iste

nt w

ith th

e re

posi

tory

ho

st ro

ck e

xcav

ated

by

mec

hani

cal m

eans

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal d

egra

datio

n of

inve

rt (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

22);

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

8.05

.0A

– F

low

thro

ugh

inve

rt (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

37).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift I

nver

t (BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8274

6]).

02-0

9 [D

elet

ed]

02-1

0

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t In

vert

Con

figur

atio

n [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

gene

ral c

onfig

urat

ion,

pla

n, a

nd d

etai

ls o

f th

e em

plac

emen

t drif

t inv

ert i

s th

e E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift I

nver

t IE

D.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� D

rift-S

cale

TH

C S

eepa

ge M

odel

, Sec

tion

4.1.

10 (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

7740

4]);

x� S

eism

ic C

onse

quen

ce A

bstra

ctio

n, T

able

4-1

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

176

828]

); x�

Drif

t-Sca

le C

oupl

ed P

roce

sses

(DS

T an

d TH

S

eepa

ge) M

odel

s, S

ectio

n 4.

1.4

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1722

32]);

x�

Mul

tisca

le T

herm

ohyd

rolo

gic

Mod

el, A

dden

dum

1,

Sec

tion

4.1[

a] (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

8138

3]);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal d

egra

datio

n of

inve

rt (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

22);

x� F

EP

2.1

.09.

03.0

C –

Vol

ume

incr

ease

of c

orro

sion

pr

oduc

ts im

pact

s ot

her E

BS c

ompo

nent

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

47).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift I

nver

t (BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8274

6]).

32 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

WA

STE

PAC

KA

GE

03-0

1 W

aste

Pac

kage

D

imen

sion

s an

d C

ompo

nent

Mas

ses

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce

Par

amet

ers]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

was

te p

acka

ge d

imen

sion

s an

d co

mpo

nent

mas

ses

is t

he W

aste

Pac

kage

C

onfig

urat

ion

IED

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� S

eism

ic C

onse

quen

ce A

bstra

ctio

n, T

able

4-1

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

176

828]

); x�

EB

S R

adio

nucl

ide

Tran

spor

t Abs

tract

ion,

Sec

tion

4.1.

3 (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

7740

7]).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

s:

x� IE

D W

aste

Pac

kage

Con

figur

atio

n (B

SC 2

007

[DIR

S

1829

28]);

03-0

2 W

aste

Pac

kage

Q

uant

ities

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce P

aram

eter

s]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

was

te p

acka

ges

in th

e LA

-des

ign

inve

ntor

y,

incl

udin

g qu

antit

ies,

dim

ensi

ons,

mat

eria

ls,

and

char

acte

ristic

s, is

the

Was

te P

acka

ge

Con

figur

atio

n IE

D(s

).

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

12.0

A –

Indu

ced

hydr

olog

ic c

hang

es in

in

vert

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4] S

ectio

n 6.

2.42

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

8.14

.0A

– C

onde

nsat

ion

on u

nder

side

of

Drip

Shi

eld

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4] S

ectio

n 6.

2.43

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.03

.0A

– E

xoth

erm

ic re

actio

ns in

the

EB

S

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4] S

ectio

n 6.

2.68

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.25

.0B

– N

aval

SN

F cl

addi

ng (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

019]

Sec

tion

6.2.

15).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D W

aste

Pac

kage

Con

figur

atio

n (B

SC 2

007

[DIR

S

1829

28]).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 33

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03

-03

Was

te P

acka

ge O

uter

The

was

te p

acka

ge o

uter

bar

rier s

hall

be

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: B

arrie

r Mat

eria

l and

Th

ickn

ess

com

pris

ed o

f Allo

y 22

with

a m

inim

um

th

ickn

ess

of 2

5 m

m fo

r cod

ispo

sal,

nava

l,

and

TAD

was

te p

acka

ges.

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

8.15

.0A

– C

onso

lidat

ion

of E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.44

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

2.03

.0A

– G

as g

ener

atio

n (H

2) fr

om w

aste

N

ote:

See

Par

amet

er 0

3-19

, Was

te

Pac

kage

Out

er B

arrie

r Mat

eria

l S

peci

ficat

ions

for A

lloy

22 m

ater

ial

com

posi

tion.

pack

age

corro

sion

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

76);

x� G

ener

al C

orro

sion

and

Loc

aliz

ed C

orro

sion

of W

aste

Pac

kage

Out

er B

arrie

r (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

7851

9]

Sec

tion

6.4.

2).;

Not

e: W

ith re

spec

t to

min

imum

thic

knes

s, th

is d

eriv

ed

inte

rnal

con

stra

int s

tate

men

t has

bee

n de

velo

ped

as a

n ag

reed

upo

n en

gine

erin

g-sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t ca

n be

inco

rpor

ated

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

th

roug

h th

eir i

mpl

emen

tatio

n. T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al

cons

train

t doe

s no

t est

ablis

h a

min

imum

thic

knes

s

inte

rnal

con

stra

int f

or fu

ture

was

te p

acka

ge d

esig

ns.

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 34

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-0

4 W

aste

Pac

kage

Th

e di

ffere

nce

betw

een

the

was

te p

acka

ge

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: R

adia

l Gap

in

ner v

esse

l out

er d

iam

eter

and

the

oute

r co

rrosi

on b

arrie

r inn

er d

iam

eter

sha

ll be

a

min

imum

of 2

mm

and

a m

axim

um o

f 10

mm

for t

he a

s fa

bric

ated

pac

kage

.

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

07.0

A –

Mec

hani

cal i

mpa

ct o

n w

aste

pa

ckag

e (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.13

); x�

FEP

2.1

.09.

03.0

B –

Vol

ume

incr

ease

of c

orro

sion

pr

oduc

ts im

pact

s w

aste

pac

kage

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

4995

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.25

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.07

.0A

– T

herm

al e

xpan

sion

/stre

ss o

f in-

drift

EB

S c

ompo

nent

s (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

69);

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

07.0

A –

The

rmal

exp

ansi

on/s

tress

of i

n-dr

ift E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.29

). N

ote:

Thi

s de

rived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int s

tate

men

t has

be

en d

evel

oped

as

an a

gree

d up

on e

ngin

eerin

g-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat c

an b

e in

corp

orat

ed

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

03-0

5 W

aste

Pac

kage

Th

e di

ffere

nce

betw

een

the

inne

r ves

sel

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: Lo

ngitu

dina

l Gap

over

all l

engt

h an

d th

e ou

ter c

orro

sion

bar

rier

cavi

ty le

ngth

, fro

m th

e to

p su

rface

of t

he

inte

rface

ring

to th

e bo

ttom

sur

face

of t

he

top

lid, s

hall

be a

min

imum

of 3

0 m

m.

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

07.0

A –

The

rmal

exp

ansi

on/s

tress

of i

n-dr

ift E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.69

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.07

.0A

– T

herm

al e

xpan

sion

/stre

ss o

f in-

drift

EB

S c

ompo

nent

s (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5],

Sec

tion

6.2.

29).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

35 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-0

6 W

aste

Pac

kage

In

tern

al P

ress

uriz

atio

n Th

e w

aste

pac

kage

sha

ll be

des

igne

d to

ac

com

mod

ate

inte

rnal

pre

ssur

izat

ion

of th

e w

aste

pac

kage

incl

udin

g ef

fect

s of

a h

igh

tem

pera

ture

of 3

50 °

C a

nd fu

el ro

d ga

s re

leas

e.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

07.0

A –

Mec

hani

cal i

mpa

ct o

n w

aste

pa

ckag

e (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.13

).

03-0

7 W

aste

Pac

kage

C

orro

sion

Allo

wan

ce

[Info

rmat

ion

Onl

y]

Fo

r pos

tclo

sure

mec

hani

cal c

alcu

latio

ns a

nd

anal

ysis

, a c

orro

sion

allo

wan

ce o

f at l

east

2

mm

per

sid

e sh

all b

e ac

coun

ted

for o

n ex

pose

d w

aste

pac

kage

sur

face

s.

Cal

cula

tions

will

be

perfo

rmed

usi

ng

mec

hani

cal p

rope

rties

at 1

50 °

C o

r gre

ater

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

01.0

A –

Gen

eral

cor

rosi

on o

f was

te

pack

ages

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.2)

. N

ote:

Thi

s de

rived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int s

tate

men

t has

be

en d

evel

oped

as

an a

gree

d up

on e

ngin

eerin

g-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat c

an b

e in

corp

orat

ed

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

03-0

8 S

eism

ic D

esig

n of

W

aste

Pac

kage

[C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

seis

mic

des

ign

spec

tra, t

ime

hist

orie

s, a

nd

grou

nd a

ccel

erat

ions

for t

he s

ubsu

rface

fa

cilit

ies

is t

he S

eism

ic D

ata

IED

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

A –

Sei

smic

gro

und

mot

ion

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

3).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D S

eism

ic D

ata

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

7927

8]).

03-0

9 W

aste

Pac

kage

W

orst

-Cas

e D

ose

Rat

e

The

was

te p

acka

ge c

onta

inin

g th

e TA

D

cani

ster

with

21

PW

R fu

el a

ssem

blie

s sh

all

repr

esen

t the

wor

st-c

ase

dose

rate

(80

G

Wd/

MTU

bur

nup,

5%

U-2

35 e

nric

hmen

t an

d 5

year

s de

cay)

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.13.

02.0

A –

Rad

iatio

n da

mag

e in

EB

S (B

SC

20

04 [D

IRS

170

020]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

38);

x� F

EP

2.1

.13.

02.0

A –

Rad

iatio

n da

mag

e in

EB

S (B

SC

20

05 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

82).

36 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-1

0 W

aste

Pac

kage

D

esig

n B

asis

B

ound

ing

Dos

e R

ate

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce

Par

amet

ers]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

desi

gn b

asis

bou

ndin

g do

se ra

te

calc

ulat

ions

for w

aste

pac

kage

s an

d re

pres

enta

tive

neut

ron

flux

is th

e W

aste

P

acka

ge R

adia

tion

Cha

ract

eris

tics

IED

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.13.

01.0

A –

Rad

ioly

sis

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

5014

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.81

). C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

x� IE

D W

aste

Pac

kage

Rad

iatio

n C

hara

cter

istic

s (B

SC

2006

[DIR

S 1

8050

3]).

03-1

1 W

aste

Pac

kage

D

ecay

Hea

t [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

s fo

r the

po

stcl

osur

e de

sign

bas

is w

aste

pac

kage

de

cay

heat

are

the

Was

te P

acka

ge D

ecay

H

eat G

ener

atio

n IE

Ds.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

03.0

A –

Exo

ther

mic

reac

tions

in th

e E

BS

(B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

020]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

32);

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

03.0

A –

Exo

ther

mic

reac

tions

in th

e E

BS

(B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

68).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

s:

x� IE

D W

aste

Pac

kage

Dec

ay H

eat G

ener

atio

n –

TSP

A

Mod

elin

g B

asis

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8301

6]);

x�

IE

D W

aste

Pac

kage

Dec

ay H

eat G

ener

atio

n D

esig

n B

asis

and

The

rmal

Info

rmat

ion

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S

1804

49]).

03-1

2 W

aste

Pac

kage

Fa

bric

atio

n Th

e w

aste

pac

kage

out

er c

orro

sion

bar

rier

cylin

der s

hall

be fa

bric

ated

from

no

mor

e th

an 3

sec

tions

with

long

itudi

nal w

elds

of

fset

. The

was

te p

acka

ge w

ill be

insp

ecte

d an

d ev

alua

ted

per a

pplic

able

crit

eria

, e.g

., P

aram

eter

03-

18, a

t the

fabr

icat

or lo

catio

n an

d up

on re

ceip

t at t

he re

posi

tory

loca

tion.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

A –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of w

aste

pac

kage

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

15).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

37 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-1

3 W

aste

Pac

kage

Fa

bric

atio

n W

eld

Insp

ectio

ns

The

was

te p

acka

ge o

uter

cor

rosi

on b

arrie

r fa

bric

atio

n w

elds

sha

ll be

non

dest

ruct

ivel

y ex

amin

ed b

y m

eans

of r

adio

grap

hic

ex

amin

atio

n (R

T) a

nd u

ltras

onic

test

ing

(UT)

fo

r fla

ws

equa

l to

or g

reat

er th

an 1

/16

inch

. O

uter

cor

rosi

on b

arrie

r fab

ricat

ion

wel

ds

shal

l als

o be

exa

min

ed u

sing

liqu

id

pene

trant

per

the

appl

icab

le s

peci

ficat

ion.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

A –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of w

aste

pac

kage

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

15).

x� A

naly

sis

of M

echa

nism

s fo

r Ear

ly W

aste

Pac

kage

/Drip

S

hiel

d Fa

ilure

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

178

765]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

. N

ote:

Thi

s de

rived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int s

tate

men

t has

be

en d

evel

oped

as

an a

gree

d up

on e

ngin

eerin

g-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat c

an b

e in

corp

orat

ed

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

03-1

4 W

aste

Pac

kage

W

eldi

ng M

ater

ials

Th

e w

aste

pac

kage

fabr

icat

ion

wel

ds s

hall

be c

ondu

cted

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith s

tand

ard

nucl

ear i

ndus

try re

quire

men

ts.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

A –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of w

aste

pac

kage

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

15).

03-1

5 W

aste

Pac

kage

Fa

bric

atio

n W

eldi

ng

Flaw

s

The

wel

ding

tech

niqu

es fo

r the

fabr

icat

ion

wel

ds s

hall

be c

onst

rain

ed to

GM

AW

(gas

m

etal

arc

wel

ding

) exc

ept f

or s

hort-

circ

uitin

g m

ode,

and

aut

omat

ed G

TAW

(gas

tung

sten

ar

c w

eldi

ng) f

or A

lloy

22 (U

NS

N06

022)

m

ater

ial,

limite

d to

<45

kJ/

in. W

eldi

ng fl

aws

1/16

inch

and

gre

ater

will

be re

paire

d fo

r the

ou

ter c

orro

sion

bar

rier i

n ac

cord

ance

with

w

ritte

n pr

oced

ures

that

hav

e be

en a

ccep

ted

by th

e de

sign

org

aniz

atio

n pr

ior t

o th

eir

usag

e.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

A –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of w

aste

pac

kage

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

15);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

02.0

A –

Stre

ss c

orro

sion

cra

ckin

g (S

CC

) of

was

te p

acka

ges

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5],

Sec

tion

6.2.

4).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

38 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-1

6 W

aste

Pac

kage

a)

Afte

r fab

ricat

ion

and

befo

re in

serti

ng th

e R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Ann

ealin

g in

ner v

esse

l, th

e w

aste

pac

kage

out

er

corro

sion

bar

rier s

hall

be s

olut

ion

anne

aled

and

que

nche

d.

b) T

he m

inim

um ti

me

for s

olut

ion

anne

alin

g w

ill be

20

min

utes

at 2

,050

°F

(1,1

21 °

C)

+50

°F (2

8 °C

) / -0

°F

(0 °

C).

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

02.0

A –

Stre

ss c

orro

sion

cra

ckin

g (S

CC

) of

was

te p

acka

ges

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5],

Sec

tion

6.2.

4);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

A –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of w

aste

pac

kage

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

15),

c)

The

was

te p

acka

ge s

hall

be q

uenc

hed

at

a ra

te g

reat

er th

an 2

75 °

F (1

53 °

C) p

er

min

ute

to b

elow

700

°F

(371

°C

). d)

The

ann

ealin

g-in

duce

d ox

ide

film

sha

ll be

re

mov

ed b

y m

eans

of e

lect

roch

emic

al

polis

hing

or g

rit b

last

ing.

e)

Afte

r sol

utio

n an

neal

ing

and

quen

chin

g,

the

was

te p

acka

ge s

urfa

ce te

mpe

ratu

re

will

be k

ept b

elow

300

°C

to e

limin

ate

post

clos

ure

issu

es (i

.e.,

phas

e st

abilit

y),

exce

pt fo

r sho

rt-te

rm e

xpos

ure

(clo

sure

w

eld,

etc

.).

x� G

ener

al C

orro

sion

and

Loc

aliz

ed C

orro

sion

of W

aste

Pac

kage

Out

er B

arrie

r (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

7851

9]

Sec

tion

6.4.

4.4)

. N

ote:

Thi

s de

rived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int s

tate

men

t has

be

en d

evel

oped

as

an a

gree

d up

on e

ngin

eerin

g-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat c

an b

e in

corp

orat

ed

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 39

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-1

7 W

aste

Pac

kage

a)

Th

e A

lloy

22 o

uter

lid

will

be s

eale

d R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Clo

sure

ut

ilizi

ng th

e ga

s tu

ngst

en a

rc w

eld

(GTA

W) p

roce

ss, l

imite

d to

<45

kJ/

in.

Th

e w

eld

mas

s sh

all b

e le

ss th

an 0

.104

lb

/in (1

8.5

g/cm

) of w

eld.

b)

Th

e A

lloy

22 o

uter

lid

wel

d w

ill be

no

ndes

truct

ivel

y ex

amin

ed u

sing

VT,

E

T, a

nd U

T. F

law

s gr

eate

r tha

n 1/

16

inch

(1.6

mm

) sha

ll be

repa

ired.

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

02.0

A –

Stre

ss c

orro

sion

cra

ckin

g (S

CC

) of

was

te p

acka

ges

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5],

Sec

tion

6.2.

4);

x� W

eld

Flaw

Eva

luat

ion

and

Non

dest

ruct

ive

Exa

min

atio

n P

roce

ss C

ompa

rison

Res

ults

for H

igh-

Leve

l R

adio

activ

e W

aste

Pac

kage

Man

ufac

turin

g P

rogr

am

(Sm

ith 2

003

[DIR

S 1

6311

4], S

ectio

n 2.

2.3.

1).

c)

The

Allo

y 22

out

er li

d w

eld

will

be s

tress

m

itiga

ted

usin

g lo

w-p

last

icity

bur

nish

ing

to a

com

pres

sive

dep

th o

f at l

east

3 m

m.

d)

Pro

cess

con

trol t

o en

sure

ther

e ha

s be

en a

dequ

ate

stre

ss m

itiga

tion

on th

e w

elds

will

be p

erfo

rmed

. Fol

low

ing

the

stre

ss m

itiga

tion,

the

final

clo

sure

wel

d w

ill be

reex

amin

ed u

sing

VT,

ET,

and

U

T.

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

03-1

8 W

aste

Pac

kage

The

was

te p

acka

ge s

hall

be c

ertif

ied

as

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

: S

urfa

ce M

arrin

g P

rior

to E

mpl

acem

ent

suita

ble

for e

mpl

acem

ent b

y pr

oces

s co

ntro

l an

d/or

insp

ectio

n to

ens

ure

surfa

ce m

arrin

g is

acc

epta

ble

per d

eriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t. x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.07

.0A

– M

echa

nica

l im

pact

on

was

te

pack

age

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

13).

The

surfa

ce m

arrin

g co

nstra

ints

are

: The

da

mag

e to

the

was

te p

acka

ge c

orro

sion

ba

rrier

that

dis

plac

es m

ater

ial (

i.e.

scra

tche

s) s

hall

be li

mite

d to

1/1

6 in

ch (1

.6

mm

) in

dept

h. M

odifi

catio

ns to

the

was

te

pack

age

corro

sion

bar

rier t

hat d

efor

m th

e su

rface

, but

do

not r

emov

e m

ater

ial (

i.e.

dent

s), s

hall

not l

eave

resi

dual

tens

ile

stre

sses

gre

ater

than

257

MP

a.

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

40 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03

-19

Was

te P

acka

ge O

uter

Th

e w

aste

pac

kage

Allo

y 22

will

be

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: B

arrie

r Mat

eria

l S

peci

ficat

ions

man

ufac

ture

d to

AS

TM B

575-

99a

[DIR

S

1474

65] w

ith th

e ad

ditio

nal m

ore

rest

rictiv

e,

elem

enta

l and

che

mic

al c

ompo

sitio

n

allo

wab

le s

peci

ficat

ions

: (a)

Cr =

20.

0 to

21

.4%

, (b)

Mo

= 12

.5 to

13.

5%, (

c) W

= 2

.5

to 3

.0%

, and

(d) F

e =

2.0

to 4

.5%

.

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

06.0

A –

The

rmal

sen

sitiz

atio

n of

was

te

pack

ages

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.27

); x�

Agi

ng a

nd P

hase

Sta

bilit

y of

Was

te P

acka

ge O

uter

B

arrie

r, S

ectio

n 8.

1 an

d 8.

2 (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

17

1924

]).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

he v

alue

s us

ed in

the

Agi

ng a

nd

Pha

se S

tabi

lity

AM

R a

re b

ased

upo

n ex

perim

enta

l va

lues

. U

sing

Allo

y 22

with

low

er a

lloyi

ng e

lem

ent

conc

entra

tions

is a

ccep

tabl

e be

caus

e it

is le

ss li

kely

that

al

loyi

ng e

lem

ents

wou

ld p

reci

pita

te.

Hig

her

conc

entra

tions

may

be

supp

orta

ble

in th

e fu

ture

, but

are

no

t cur

rent

ly a

naly

zed.

03-2

0 M

ater

ials

Con

tact

ing

the

Was

te P

acka

ge

Afte

r fab

ricat

ion

final

cle

anin

g, th

e w

aste

pa

ckag

e sh

all b

e pr

epar

ed fo

r shi

pmen

t.

Mat

eria

ls o

r obj

ects

con

tact

ing

the

was

te

pack

age

oute

r sur

face

s du

ring

trans

porta

tion,

load

ing,

and

em

plac

emen

t w

ill be

eva

luat

ed to

ens

ure

that

any

phy

sica

l de

grad

atio

n an

d co

ntam

inat

ion

are

with

in

allo

wab

le li

mits

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

01.0

A –

Gen

eral

cor

rosi

on o

f was

te

pack

ages

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.2)

. x�

Gen

eral

Cor

rosi

on a

nd L

ocal

ized

Cor

rosi

on o

f Was

te

P

acka

ge O

uter

Bar

rier (

SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

178

519]

,

Sec

tion

5.1)

41 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-2

1 W

aste

Pac

kage

Th

e w

aste

pac

kage

sha

ll be

han

dled

in a

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Han

dlin

g co

ntro

lled

man

ner d

urin

g fa

bric

atio

n,

hand

ling,

tran

spor

t, st

orag

e, e

mpl

acem

ent,

inst

alla

tion,

ope

ratio

n, a

nd c

losu

re a

ctiv

ities

to

min

imiz

e da

mag

e; s

urfa

ce c

onta

min

atio

n;

and

expo

sure

to a

dver

se s

ubst

ance

s.

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

01.0

A –

Gen

eral

cor

rosi

on o

f was

te

pack

ages

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.2)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.08

.0A

– E

arly

failu

re o

f was

te p

acka

ges

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.15

); x�

Gen

eral

Cor

rosi

on a

nd L

ocal

ized

Cor

rosi

on o

f Was

te

P

acka

ge O

uter

Bar

rier (

SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

178

519]

,

Sec

tion

5.1)

03-2

2 W

aste

Pac

kage

W

aste

pac

kage

han

dlin

g an

d em

plac

emen

t R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

is:

Han

dlin

g an

d

Em

plac

emen

t ac

tiviti

es s

hall

be m

onito

red

thro

ugh

equi

pmen

t with

reso

lutio

n ca

pabl

e of

de

tect

ing

was

te p

acka

ge d

amag

e. A

n x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

3.01

.0A

– E

rror

in w

aste

em

plac

emen

t (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

. op

erat

or a

nd a

n in

depe

nden

t che

cker

sha

ll pe

rform

the

oper

atio

ns. R

ecor

ds

dem

onst

ratin

g co

mpl

ianc

e sh

all b

e m

aint

aine

d.

03-2

3 W

aste

Pac

kage

S

urfa

ce F

inis

h Th

e w

aste

pac

kage

sur

face

fini

sh s

hall

be

spec

ified

to b

e at

leas

t 125

roug

hnes

s as

de

fined

in A

SME

B46

.1 [D

IRS

166

013]

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

A –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of w

aste

pac

kage

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

15).

42 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03-2

4 W

aste

Pac

kage

Th

e em

plac

emen

t drif

t gro

und

supp

ort

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

Sur

face

Dam

age

Prio

r to

Clo

sure

sy

stem

sha

ll be

insp

ecte

d pr

ior t

o dr

ip s

hiel

d in

stal

latio

n. W

aste

pac

kage

s th

at h

ave

com

e in

con

tact

with

falle

n ro

ck o

r gro

und

supp

ort m

ater

ials

will

be in

spec

ted

to e

nsur

e th

e da

mag

e to

the

was

te p

acka

ge c

orro

sion

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

07.0

A –

Mec

hani

cal i

mpa

ct o

n w

aste

pa

ckag

e (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.13

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.08

.0A

– E

arly

failu

re o

f was

te p

acka

ges

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.15

); ba

rrier

that

dis

plac

e m

ater

ial (

i.e. s

crat

ches

), sh

all b

e lim

ited

to 1

.6 m

m (1

/16

in) i

n de

pth.

M

odifi

catio

ns to

the

was

te p

acka

ge

co

rrosi

on b

arrie

r tha

t def

orm

the

surfa

ce,

but d

o no

t rem

ove

mat

eria

l (i.e

. den

ts),

shal

l

not l

eave

resi

dual

tens

ile s

tress

es g

reat

er

than

257

MPa

.

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

01.0

A –

Roc

kfal

l (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

4995

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.22

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.01

.0A

– R

ockf

all (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1750

14],

Sec

tion

6.2.

28).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

he p

ostc

losu

re a

naly

ses

do n

ot s

peci

fy

or re

fere

nce

an a

llow

able

qua

ntity

of s

urfa

ce d

amag

e or

a m

axim

um a

ccep

tabl

e si

ze o

f a d

ent o

r scr

atch

. Unt

il su

ch ti

me,

the

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t for

scr

atch

es is

ba

sed

upon

the

max

imum

allo

wab

le w

eld

flaw

s in

the

fabr

icat

ion

spec

ifica

tion,

whi

ch is

def

ined

in A

naly

sis

of

Mec

hani

sms

for E

arly

Was

te P

acka

ge/D

rip S

hiel

d Fa

ilure

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

178

765]

, Sec

tion

6.3.

1.2)

. Th

ese

crite

ria a

re th

e ba

sis

for e

xclu

ding

bas

e m

etal

flaw

s fro

m fu

rther

con

side

ratio

n in

ear

ly w

aste

pac

kage

fa

ilure

mec

hani

sms

in T

SP

A (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

7876

5],

Sec

tion

6.3.

6).

03-2

5 [D

elet

ed.]

43 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

03

-26

Was

te P

acka

ge

Moi

stur

e R

emov

al a

nd

Iner

ting

All

was

te p

acka

ges

shal

l be

vacu

um d

ried

and

back

fille

d w

ith h

eliu

m in

a m

anne

r co

nsis

tent

with

that

des

crib

ed in

Sta

ndar

d R

evie

w P

lan

for D

ry C

ask

Sto

rage

Sys

tem

s (N

UR

EG 1

536)

(NR

C 1

997

[DIR

S 1

0190

3]),

Sec

tion

8.V

.1.

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

06.0

A –

Inte

rnal

cor

rosi

on o

f was

te

pack

ages

prio

r to

brea

ch (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.12

).

WA

STE

FOR

M &

TA

D C

AN

ISTE

R

04-0

1 Lo

adin

g of

Was

te

Form

s

To m

inim

ize

was

te fo

rm d

amag

e, w

aste

pa

ckag

e an

d TA

D c

anis

ter-

load

ing

activ

ities

sh

all b

e pe

rform

ed a

nd m

onito

red

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith in

dust

ry s

tand

ard

prac

tices

in

clud

ing

an o

pera

tor a

nd a

n in

depe

nden

t ch

ecke

r. R

ecor

ds d

emon

stra

ting

com

plia

nce

shal

l be

mai

ntai

ned.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

1.1

.03.

01.0

A –

Err

or in

was

te e

mpl

acem

ent (

BSC

20

05 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

1).

04-0

2 H

andl

ing

of B

are

SN

F B

are

SN

F sh

all b

e ha

ndle

d in

a s

tand

ard

indu

stry

fash

ion

to li

mit

dam

age

and

prev

ent

unzi

ppin

g of

fuel

rod

clad

ding

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

9.03

.0A

– V

olum

e in

crea

se o

f cor

rosi

on

prod

ucts

impa

cts

clad

ding

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9],

Sec

tion

6.2.

19).

04-0

3 W

aste

For

m C

SN

F Fu

el R

od M

axim

um

Bur

nup

Lim

it

The

CSN

F fu

el ro

d or

ass

embl

y m

axim

um

burn

up s

hall

be le

ss th

an 8

0 G

Wd/

MTU

(thi

s is

bou

nded

by

the

PW

R b

urnu

p).

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

20.0

A –

Inte

rnal

pre

ssur

izat

ion

of c

ladd

ing

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9], S

ectio

n 6.

2.10

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.21

.0A

– S

tress

cor

rosi

on c

rack

ing

(SC

C)

of c

ladd

ing

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9],

Sec

tion

6.2.

11).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 44

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

04-0

4 W

aste

For

m M

oist

ure

All

TAD

can

iste

rs s

hall

be v

acuu

m d

ried

and

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: R

emov

al a

nd In

ertin

g ba

ckfil

led

with

hel

ium

in a

man

ner

cons

iste

nt w

ith th

at d

escr

ibed

in S

tand

ard

Rev

iew

Pla

n fo

r Dry

Cas

k S

tora

ge S

yste

ms

(NU

REG

153

6) (N

RC

199

7 [D

IRS

101

903]

), S

ectio

n 8.

V.1

.

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

11.0

A –

Deg

rada

tion

of c

ladd

ing

from

w

ater

logg

ed ro

ds (B

SC 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9],

Sec

tion

6.2.

1);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

06.0

A –

Inte

rnal

cor

rosi

on o

f was

te

pack

ages

prio

r to

brea

ch (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.12

).

Not

e: T

his

inte

rnal

con

stra

int i

s re

flect

ed in

Pre

limin

ary

Tran

spor

tatio

n, A

ging

and

Dis

posa

l Can

iste

r Sys

tem

Per

form

ance

Spe

cific

atio

n (D

OE

200

6 [D

IRS

179

349]

, S

ectio

n 3.

1.6)

. N

ote

that

thes

e FE

P a

naly

ses

are

bein

g re

vise

d to

be

co

nsis

tent

with

the

TAD

can

iste

r spe

cific

atio

n.

04-0

5 C

ladd

ing

Tem

pera

ture

Th

e m

axim

um te

mpe

ratu

re o

f the

CS

NF

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: Li

mit

– W

aste

For

m

clad

ding

upo

n em

plac

emen

t sha

ll no

t

exce

ed 3

50 °

C (t

o pr

even

t dam

age

from

cr

eep

or h

ydrid

e re

orie

ntat

ion)

. x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.19

.0A

– C

reep

rupt

ure

of c

ladd

ing

(BSC

20

04 [D

IRS

170

019]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

9);

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

21.0

A –

Stre

ss c

orro

sion

cra

ckin

g (S

CC

) of

cla

ddin

g (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

019]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.11

);

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

22.0

A –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of c

ladd

ing

(BSC

20

04 [D

IRS

170

019]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

12);

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

26.0

A –

Diff

usio

n-co

ntro

lled

cavi

ty g

row

th

in c

ladd

ing

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9],

Sec

tion

6.2.

16).

N

ote:

Der

ived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int m

ay c

hang

e if

CS

NF

clad

ding

per

form

ance

is n

ot in

clud

ed in

per

form

ance

as

sess

men

t.

45 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

04-0

6 M

axim

um

Tem

pera

ture

of H

LW

Gla

ss C

anis

ters

–

W

aste

For

m

The

max

imum

HLW

gla

ss te

mpe

ratu

re s

hall

be

less

than

400

°C

. R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

03.0

A –

HLW

gla

ss d

egra

datio

n (A

ltera

tion,

Dis

solu

tion,

and

Rad

ionu

clid

e R

elea

se)

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7002

0], S

ectio

n 6.

2.7)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.06

.0A

– H

LW G

lass

Rec

ryst

alliz

atio

n (B

SC

2004

[DIR

S 1

7002

0], S

ectio

n 6.

2.10

); x�

Def

ense

HLW

Gla

ss D

egra

datio

n M

odel

(BSC

200

4 [D

IRS

169

988,

Sec

tion

7.5]

).

04-0

7 W

aste

Pac

kage

W

aste

pac

kage

cap

aciti

es s

hall

be a

s

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: C

apac

ities

fo

llow

s:

a) T

AD

-Bea

ring

Was

te P

acka

ge:

1 C

SN

F TA

D c

anis

ter.

x� F

EP

2.1

.01.

02.0

A –

Inte

ract

ions

bet

wee

n co

-loca

ted

was

te (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

020]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

2);

x� F

EP

2.1

.01.

02.0

B –

Inte

ract

ions

bet

wee

n co

-dis

pose

d b)

Nav

al W

aste

Pac

kage

s:

1 N

SN

F ca

nist

er.

c) 2

-MC

O/2

-DH

LW W

aste

Pac

kage

: 2

N-R

eact

or M

CO

s an

d 2

HLW

gla

ss

cani

ster

s (s

hort

load

ing

allo

wed

).

d) 5

-HLW

/DO

E S

NF

Co-

disp

osal

Was

te

Pac

kage

s:

Eith

er: 5

HLW

gla

ss c

anis

ters

(inc

ludi

ng

no m

ore

than

1 L

aBS

gla

ss c

anis

ter)

and

1

DS

NF

cani

ster

in th

e ce

nter

pos

ition

(s

hort

load

ing

allo

wed

), O

r: 1

24-in

ch D

SN

F ca

nist

er a

nd 4

HLW

ca

nist

ers

(cen

ter p

ositi

on e

mpt

y an

d no

La

BS

gla

ss c

anis

ters

) (sh

ort l

oadi

ng

allo

wed

).

was

te (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

020]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

3);

x� M

OX

Spe

nt N

ucle

ar F

uel a

nd L

aBS

Gla

ss fo

r TS

PA

-LA

, Sec

tion

6 (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

7742

2]).

46 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

04-0

8 H

andl

ing

of W

aste

Fo

rms

Was

te fo

rm h

andl

ing

oper

atio

ns s

hall

be

perfo

rmed

in a

sta

ndar

d in

dust

ry fa

shio

n to

lim

it da

mag

e. A

n op

erat

or a

nd a

n in

depe

nden

t che

cker

sha

ll pe

rform

the

oper

atio

ns. R

ecor

ds d

emon

stra

ting

com

plia

nce

shal

l be

mai

ntai

ned.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

11.0

A –

Deg

rada

tion

of c

ladd

ing

from

w

ater

logg

ed ro

ds; (

BSC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

019]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.12

.0A

– D

egra

datio

n of

cla

ddin

g pr

ior t

o di

spos

al (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

019]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

2).

04-0

9 W

aste

Pac

kage

&

Mat

eria

ls th

at h

ave

not b

een

prev

ious

ly

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

TAD

Can

iste

r E

xclu

ded

Mat

eria

ls

anal

yzed

and

incl

uded

in th

e W

aste

P

acka

ge C

onfig

urat

ion

IED

s sh

all n

ot b

e pl

aced

in th

e w

aste

pac

kage

, or i

n th

e TA

D

cani

ster

that

will

be p

lace

d in

to th

e w

aste

pa

ckag

e.

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

14.0

A –

Mic

robi

ally

influ

ence

d co

rrosi

on

(MIC

) of c

ladd

ing

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9],

Sec

tion

6.2.

4);

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

19.0

A –

Cre

ep ru

ptur

e of

cla

ddin

g (B

SC

2004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9], S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

9.02

.0A

– C

hem

ical

Inte

ract

ion

with

C

orro

sion

Pro

duct

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.46

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.02

.0A

– C

SN

F D

egra

datio

n (A

ltera

tion,

D

isso

lutio

n, a

nd R

adio

nucl

ide

Rel

ease

) (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

020]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

6).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D W

aste

Pac

kage

Con

figur

atio

n (B

SC 2

007

[DIR

S

1829

28]).

Not

e: T

he T

AD c

anis

ter i

nter

nal c

onst

rain

t is

refle

cted

in

Pre

limin

ary

Tran

spor

tatio

n, A

ging

and

Dis

posa

l Can

iste

r S

yste

m P

erfo

rman

ce S

peci

ficat

ion

(DO

E 20

06 [D

IRS

17

9349

], S

ectio

n 3.

1.8)

.

47 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

EMPL

AC

EMEN

T &

RET

RIE

VAL

05-0

1 W

aste

Pac

kage

H

andl

ing

and

E

mpl

acem

ent

Was

te p

acka

ge h

andl

ing

and

empl

acem

ent

activ

ities

sha

ll be

mon

itore

d th

roug

h ap

prop

riate

equ

ipm

ent.

An

oper

ator

and

an

inde

pend

ent i

nspe

ctor

sha

ll ve

rify

prop

er

was

te p

acka

ge in

stal

latio

n. R

ecor

ds

dem

onst

ratin

g co

mpl

ianc

e sh

all b

e m

aint

aine

d.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

1.1

.03.

01.0

A –

Err

or in

was

te e

mpl

acem

ent (

BSC

20

05 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

1).

05-0

2 W

aste

Pac

kage

S

paci

ng

Adj

acen

t was

te p

acka

ges

in a

giv

en

empl

acem

ent d

rift s

hall

be e

mpl

aced

0.1

m

(nom

inal

) apa

rt, fr

om th

e to

p su

rface

of t

he

uppe

r sle

eve

of o

ne w

aste

pac

kage

to th

e bo

ttom

sur

face

of t

he lo

wer

sle

eve

of th

e ad

jace

nt w

aste

pac

kage

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

2.02

.0A

– P

recl

osur

e ve

ntila

tion

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

; x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

3.01

.0A

– E

rror

in w

aste

em

plac

emen

t (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

; x�

Drif

t Sca

le T

HM

Mod

el, S

ectio

n 6.

3 (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

16

9864

]);

x� In

-Drif

t Nat

ural

Con

vect

ion

and

Con

dens

atio

n,

Add

endu

m 1

, Sec

tion

4.1[

a] (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S

1816

48]).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 48

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

05-0

3 W

aste

Pac

kage

Th

e w

aste

pac

kage

em

plac

emen

t sha

ll be

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Ther

mal

Lim

its

with

in a

n en

velo

pe s

uch

that

the

empl

acem

ent o

f was

te p

acka

ges

does

not

ex

ceed

the

othe

r rel

evan

t the

rmal

lim

its o

f m

id-p

illar t

empe

ratu

re, d

rift w

all

tem

pera

ture

, was

te p

acka

ge te

mpe

ratu

re,

x� F

EP

1.1

.03.

01.0

A –

Err

or in

was

te e

mpl

acem

ent (

BSC

20

05 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

1);

x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

2.02

.0A

– P

recl

osur

e ve

ntila

tion

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

; an

d cl

addi

ng te

mpe

ratu

re. I

n ad

ditio

n, th

e lo

cal-a

vera

ge li

ne-lo

ad (o

ver a

ny 7

was

te

pack

age

segm

ent)

in th

e em

plac

ed

repo

sito

ry w

ill no

t exc

eed

2.0

kW/m

, and

no

was

te p

acka

ge s

hall

exce

ed th

erm

al o

utpu

t of

18

kW.

Fina

lly, t

he c

alcu

late

d Th

erm

al E

nerg

y D

ensi

ty o

f any

sev

en a

djac

ent a

s-em

plac

ed

w

aste

pac

kage

s sh

all n

ot e

xcee

d 96

°C a

t

x� F

EP

2.1

.01.

04.0

A –

Rep

osito

ry-s

cale

spa

tial

hete

roge

neity

of e

mpl

aced

was

te (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

17

0021

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

7);

x� F

EP

2.1

.08.

03.0

A –

Rep

osito

ry d

ry-o

ut d

ue to

was

te

heat

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.34

); x�

Drif

t Sca

le T

HM

Mod

el, S

ectio

n 4.

1.1.

3 an

d Ta

ble

6.3

1 (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

169

864]

); x�

Mul

tisca

le T

herm

ohyd

rolo

gic

Mod

el, A

dden

dum

1,

Sec

tion

4.1[

a] S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

8138

3]).

the

mid

-pilla

r cal

cula

ted

usin

g m

ean

host

-ro

ck th

erm

al p

rope

rties

and

repr

esen

tativ

e sa

tura

tion

leve

ls fo

r wet

and

dry

con

ditio

ns,

as d

escr

ibed

in th

e G

eote

chni

cal a

nd

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

: x�

IED

Geo

tech

nica

l and

The

rmal

Par

amet

ers

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7482

9], E

ntire

). Th

erm

al P

aram

eter

s IE

D(s

). x�

IED

Geo

tech

nica

l and

The

rmal

Par

amet

ers

II (B

SC

20

07 [D

IRS

178

277]

, Ent

ire).

x� IE

D G

eote

chni

cal a

nd T

herm

al P

aram

eter

s III

(BS

C

2007

[DIR

S 1

7879

6], E

ntire

). x�

IED

Geo

tech

nica

l and

The

rmal

Par

amet

ers

IV (B

SC

20

07 [D

IRS

179

808]

, Ent

ire).

N

ote:

Thi

s de

rived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int s

tate

men

t has

be

en d

evel

oped

as

an a

gree

d up

on e

ngin

eerin

g-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat c

an b

e in

corp

orat

ed

into

tech

nica

l des

igns

and

ver

ified

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 49

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

05-0

4 N

o B

ackf

ill in

E

mpl

acem

ent D

rifts

E

ngin

eere

d ba

ckfil

l sha

ll no

t be

pres

ent i

n th

e sp

ace

betw

een

the

drip

shi

eld

and

the

drift

wal

l.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.04.

01.0

A –

Flo

w in

the

back

fill (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.12

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

4.02

.0A

– C

hem

ical

pro

perti

es a

nd e

volu

tion

of b

ackf

ill (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

13);

x� F

EP

2.1

.04.

03.0

A –

Ero

sion

or d

isso

lutio

n of

bac

kfill

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.14

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

4.04

.0A

– T

herm

al-m

echa

nica

l effe

cts

of

back

fill (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.15

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

4.05

.0A

– T

herm

al-m

echa

nica

l pro

perti

es

and

evol

utio

n of

bac

kfill

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

16).

SUB

SUR

FAC

E VE

NTI

LATI

ON

06

-01

Dur

atio

n of

Ven

tilat

ion

Per

iod

The

dura

tion

of th

e ve

ntila

tion

perio

d sh

all

be a

min

imum

of 5

0 ye

ars

afte

r fin

al

empl

acem

ent.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

2.02

.0A

– P

recl

osur

e ve

ntila

tion

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

; x�

Ven

tilat

ion

Mod

el a

nd A

naly

sis

Rep

ort,

Sect

ions

4.

1.10

and

6.4

.1.1

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

6986

2]);

x� M

ultis

cale

The

rmoh

ydro

logi

c M

odel

, Add

endu

m 1

, S

ectio

n 4.

1[a]

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

181

383]

).

06-0

2 D

rift W

all

Tem

pera

ture

Th

e m

axim

um p

recl

osur

e em

plac

emen

t drif

t w

all t

empe

ratu

re s

hall

not e

xcee

d 20

0 °C

to

avoi

d po

ssib

le a

dver

se c

ondi

tions

(e.g

. m

iner

alog

ical

tran

sitio

ns, r

ock

wea

keni

ng

etc.

)

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

2.02

.0A

– P

recl

osur

e ve

ntila

tion

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.01

.0A

– H

eat g

ener

atio

n in

EB

S (B

SC

20

05 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

66);

x� F

EP

2.2

.10.

13.0

A –

Rep

osito

ry-in

duce

d th

erm

al

effe

cts

on fl

ow in

the

SZ

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

0],

Sec

tion

6.2.

40).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 50

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

06

-03

Was

te P

acka

ge

The

was

te p

acka

ge s

urfa

ce te

mpe

ratu

re

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: Te

mpe

ratu

re L

imit

shal

l be

kept

bel

ow 3

00 °

C fo

r the

firs

t 500

ye

ars

and

belo

w 2

00 °

C fo

r the

nex

t 9,5

00

year

s to

elim

inat

e po

stcl

osur

e is

sues

(i.e

. ph

ase

stab

ility)

.

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

06.0

A –

The

rmal

sen

sitiz

atio

n of

was

te

pack

ages

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.27

); x�

Agi

ng a

nd P

hase

Sta

bilit

y of

Was

te P

acka

ge O

uter

B

arrie

r, S

ectio

n 8

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7192

4]).

Not

e: C

ompl

ianc

e w

ith th

is c

onst

rain

t afte

r re

posi

tory

per

man

ent c

losu

re is

de

mon

stra

ted

in p

ostc

losu

re a

naly

ses

(onl

y). P

aram

eter

s 05

-03,

06-

01, a

nd 0

6-06

su

ppor

t com

plia

nce

with

this

con

stra

int

durin

g bo

th th

e pr

eclo

sure

and

pos

tclo

sure

pe

riods

.

06-0

4 C

ladd

ing

Tem

pera

ture

Th

e m

axim

um te

mpe

ratu

re o

f the

CS

NF

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: Li

mit

– V

entil

atio

n cl

addi

ng u

pon

empl

acem

ent s

hall

not

ex

ceed

350

°C

(to

prev

ent d

amag

e fro

m

cree

p or

hyd

ride

reor

ient

atio

n).

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

19.0

A –

Cre

ep ru

ptur

e of

cla

ddin

g (B

SC

2004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9], S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.21

.0A

– S

tress

cor

rosi

on c

rack

ing

(SC

C)

of c

ladd

ing

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9],

Sec

tion

6.2.

11);

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.22

.0A

– H

ydrid

e cr

acki

ng o

f cla

ddin

g (B

SC

2004

[DIR

S 1

7001

9], S

ectio

n 6.

2.12

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.26

.0A

– D

iffus

ion-

cont

rolle

d ca

vity

gro

wth

in

cla

ddin

g (B

SC

200

4 [D

IRS

170

019]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.16

).

N

ote:

Der

ived

inte

rnal

con

stra

int m

ay c

hang

e if

CS

NF

clad

ding

per

form

ance

is n

ot in

clud

ed in

per

form

ance

as

sess

men

t.

51 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

06-0

5 M

axim

um T

empe

ratu

re

of H

LW G

lass

Can

iste

rs

– Ve

ntila

tion

The

max

imum

HLW

gla

ss te

mpe

ratu

re s

hall

be le

ss th

an 4

00 °

C.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.02.

03.0

A –

HLW

gla

ss d

egra

datio

n (A

ltera

tion,

Dis

solu

tion,

and

Rad

ionu

clid

e R

elea

se)

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

7002

0], S

ectio

n 6.

2.7)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

2.06

.0A

– H

LW G

lass

Rec

ryst

alliz

atio

n (B

SC

2004

[DIR

S 1

7002

0], S

ectio

n 6.

2.10

); x�

Def

ense

HLW

Gla

ss D

egra

datio

n M

odel

(BSC

200

4 [D

IRS

169

988]

, Sec

tion

7.5)

.

06-0

6 A

vera

ge A

irflo

w R

ate

for P

recl

osur

e V

entil

atio

n of

E

mpl

acem

ent D

rifts

Dur

ing

the

prec

losu

re p

hase

, the

nom

inal

in

let a

irflo

w ra

te p

er e

mpl

acem

ent d

rift s

hall

be 1

5 m

3 /sec

. The

rang

e of

airf

low

rate

in a

gi

ven

drift

sha

ll be

15

m3 /s

ec ±

2 m

3 /sec

, ba

sed

on in

tegr

ated

ven

tilat

ion

effic

ienc

y an

d dr

ift le

ngth

.

x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

2.02

.0A

– P

recl

osur

e ve

ntila

tion

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4], S

ectio

n 6.

2.3)

; x�

FE

P 1

.1.0

2.00

.0A

– C

hem

ical

effe

cts

of e

xcav

atio

n an

d co

nstru

ctio

n in

EB

S (B

SC

200

* [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

1.01

.0A

– H

eat g

ener

atio

n in

EB

S (B

SC

20

05 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

66);

x� F

EP

2.2

.10.

13.0

A –

Rep

osito

ry-in

duce

d th

erm

al

effe

cts

on fl

ow in

the

SZ

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

0],

Sec

tion

6.2.

40);

x�

V

entil

atio

n M

odel

and

Ana

lysi

s R

epor

t, S

ectio

ns 6

.11

and

8.1

(BS

C 2

004

[DIR

S 1

6986

2]).

Not

e: T

he p

ostc

losu

re th

erm

al c

ondi

tion

is p

artia

lly

depe

nden

t on

the

heat

rem

oval

by

prec

losu

re v

entil

atio

n.

The

ther

mal

con

ditio

n at

the

end

of th

e pr

eclo

sure

ve

ntila

tion

is u

sed

as in

itial

con

ditio

n fo

r pos

tclo

sure

m

odel

s.

52 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

DR

IP S

HIE

LD

07-0

1 D

rip S

hiel

d D

esig

n Th

e in

terfa

ce c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm fo

r the

drip

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

[Con

trolle

d In

terfa

ce

Par

amet

ers]

sh

ield

s di

men

sion

s an

d ch

arac

teris

tics

is th

e In

terlo

ckin

g D

rip S

hiel

d IE

D.

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

10.0

B –

Adv

ectio

n of

liqu

ids

and

solid

s th

roug

h cr

acks

in th

e D

rip S

hiel

d (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

5014

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.64

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

6.07

.0A

– C

hem

ical

effe

cts

at E

BS

co

mpo

nent

inte

rface

s (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

26);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

07.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal e

ffect

s at

EB

S

com

pone

nt in

terfa

ces

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.27

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.1

2.08

.0A

– G

as e

xplo

sion

s in

EB

S (B

SC

20

05 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

80).

Cur

rent

con

trol m

echa

nism

:

x� IE

D In

terlo

ckin

g D

rip S

hiel

d (B

SC

200

7 [D

IRS

18

0444

]).

07-0

2 D

rip S

hiel

d D

esig

n an

d In

stal

latio

n Th

e dr

ip s

hiel

d sh

all b

e de

sign

ed to

inte

rlock

an

d ov

erla

p in

a m

anne

r tha

t pre

vent

s a

liqui

d dr

ip p

ath

from

abo

ve th

e dr

ip s

hiel

d to

th

e w

aste

pac

kage

. The

drip

shi

eld

hand

ling

and

empl

acem

ent a

ctiv

ities

sha

ll be

m

onito

red

thro

ugh

appr

opria

te e

quip

men

t. A

n op

erat

or a

nd a

n in

depe

nden

t ins

pect

or

sh

all v

erify

pro

per d

rip s

hiel

d in

stal

latio

n.

Rec

ords

dem

onst

ratin

g co

mpl

ianc

e sh

all b

e m

aint

aine

d.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

1.1

.03.

01.0

A –

Err

or in

was

te e

mpl

acem

ent (

BSC

20

05 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

1);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

06.0

A –

Effe

cts

of d

rip s

hiel

d on

flow

(BSC

20

05 [D

IRS

175

014]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

25);

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

06.0

A –

Flo

or b

uckl

ing

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1750

14],

Sec

tion

6.2.

32).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 53

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

07-0

3 D

rip S

hiel

d C

orro

sion

A

llow

ance

[In

form

atio

n O

nly]

For m

echa

nica

l cal

cula

tions

and

ana

lysi

s, a

co

rrosi

on a

llow

ance

of a

t lea

st 1

mm

per

si

de s

hall

be a

ccou

nted

for o

n al

l drip

shi

eld

surfa

ces.

Cal

cula

tions

will

be p

erfo

rmed

us

ing

mec

hani

cal p

rope

rties

at 1

50 °

C o

r gr

eate

r.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

A –

Sei

smic

gro

und

mot

ion

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

3);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

01.0

B –

Gen

eral

cor

rosi

on o

f drip

shi

elds

(B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

3).

07

-04

Drip

Shi

eld

Mat

eria

ls

and

Thic

knes

ses

The

drip

shi

eld

shal

l be

cons

truct

ed o

f Ti

tani

um G

rade

7, w

ith a

min

imum

thic

knes

s of

15

mm

. The

drip

shi

eld

stru

ctur

al m

ater

ial

shal

l be

man

ufac

ture

d of

Tita

nium

Gra

de

29.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

B –

Sei

smic

-indu

ced

rock

fall

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

4);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

01.0

B –

Gen

eral

cor

rosi

on o

f drip

shi

elds

(B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

3).

07-0

5 [D

elet

ed.]

07-0

6 [D

elet

ed.]

07-0

7 E

BS

Drip

Shi

eld

/ E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift

Inve

rt M

ater

ials

In

tera

ctio

ns

Allo

y 22

bas

es s

hall

be a

ttach

ed to

the

drip

sh

ield

to p

recl

ude

titan

ium

con

tact

with

the

inve

rt (in

clud

ing

trans

port

equi

pmen

t rai

ls).

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

04.0

B –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of d

rip s

hiel

ds

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

6.07

.0A

– C

hem

ical

effe

cts

at E

BS

co

mpo

nent

inte

rface

s (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

26).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 54

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

07-0

8 D

rip S

hiel

d S

eism

ic

Per

form

ance

[C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he d

rip

shie

ld d

esig

n is

the

Inte

rlock

ing

Drip

Shi

eld

IED

suc

h th

at d

urin

g a

seis

mic

eve

nt it

re

sist

s se

para

tion

thro

ugh

failu

re o

f the

DS

C

Con

nect

or G

uide

s, th

e D

SC

Lef

t/Rig

ht

Sup

port

Bea

ms,

and

the

Left/

Rig

ht S

uppo

rt B

eam

Con

nect

ors.

Not

e: C

ompl

ianc

e w

ith th

e po

stcl

osur

e pe

rform

ance

asp

ects

of t

he d

rip s

hiel

d

with

in th

is c

onst

rain

t is

dem

onst

rate

d in

po

stcl

osur

e an

alys

es (o

nly)

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� S

eism

ic C

onse

quen

ce A

bstra

ctio

n, S

ectio

n 6.

7.3

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

176

828]

). C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

x� IE

D In

terlo

ckin

g D

rip S

hiel

d (B

SC

200

7 [D

IRS

18

0444

]).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

07-0

9 D

rip S

hiel

d Fa

bric

atio

n Th

e dr

ip s

hiel

d sh

all b

e fa

bric

ated

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith s

tand

ard

nucl

ear i

ndus

try

prac

tices

, inc

ludi

ng m

ater

ial c

ontro

l, w

eldi

ng, w

eld

flaw

det

ectio

n an

d re

pair

and

heat

trea

tmen

t.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

B –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of d

rip s

hiel

ds (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.16

).

07-1

0 D

rip S

hiel

d Fa

bric

atio

n W

eld

Insp

ectio

ns

The

drip

shi

eld

full

pene

tratio

n fa

bric

atio

n w

elds

sha

ll be

non

dest

ruct

ivel

y ex

amin

ed b

y vi

sual

(VT)

, liq

uid

pene

trant

(PT)

, and

ul

traso

nic

test

ing

(UT)

, for

flaw

s. F

illet

wel

ds

shal

l be

insp

ecte

d by

mea

ns o

f PT

and

VT

for f

law

s. A

ll fla

ws

larg

er th

an c

ode

stan

dard

s sh

all b

e re

paire

d.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

B –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of d

rip s

hiel

ds (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.16

).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

55 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

07-1

1 D

rip S

hiel

d Th

e w

eldi

ng te

chni

ques

for t

he fa

bric

atio

n R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Fabr

icat

ion

Wel

ding

Fl

aws

wel

ds s

hall

be c

onst

rain

ed to

GM

AW

(gas

m

etal

arc

wel

ding

) exc

ept f

or s

hort-

circ

uitin

g m

ode,

and

aut

omat

ed G

TAW

(gas

tung

sten

ar

c w

eldi

ng).

Wel

ding

flaw

s w

ill b

e re

paire

d in

acc

orda

nce

with

writ

ten

proc

edur

es th

at

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

B –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of d

rip s

hiel

ds (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.16

);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

04.0

B –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of d

rip s

hiel

ds

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; ha

ve b

een

acce

pted

by

the

desi

gn

orga

niza

tion

prio

r to

thei

r usa

ge.

x� H

ydro

gen-

Indu

ced

Cra

ckin

g of

the

Drip

Shi

eld

(SN

L 20

07 [D

IRS

181

339]

, Sec

tion

6).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

07-1

2 D

rip S

hiel

d Fa

bric

atio

n W

eld

Mat

eria

ls

All

drip

-shi

eld

wel

ding

sha

ll be

con

duct

ed in

ac

cord

ance

with

sta

ndar

d nu

clea

r ind

ustry

pr

actic

es. F

or T

i-7 (T

itani

um G

rade

7) t

o Ti

7

wel

ds, T

i-7 w

eld

fille

r mat

eria

l sha

ll be

us

ed. F

or T

i-29

(Tita

nium

Gra

de 2

9) to

Ti-2

9 w

elds

, Ti-2

9 sh

all b

e us

ed. F

or T

i-7 to

Ti-2

9 w

elds

Ti-2

8 w

eld

fille

r sha

ll be

use

d.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

B –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of d

rip s

hiel

ds (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.16

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.02

.0B

– S

tress

cor

rosi

on c

rack

ing

(SC

C)

of d

rip s

hiel

ds (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.5)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.04

.0B

– H

ydrid

e cr

acki

ng o

f drip

shi

elds

(B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

9);

Hyd

roge

n-In

duce

d C

rack

ing

of th

e D

rip S

hiel

d (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

8133

9], S

ectio

n 6)

.

56 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

07-1

3 D

rip S

hiel

d H

eat

Afte

r fab

ricat

ion

the

drip

shi

eld

asse

mbl

y R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Trea

tmen

t an

d lif

ting

feat

ure

asse

mbl

ies

shal

l be

stre

ss-re

lieve

d. A

fter c

ompl

etio

n of

all

requ

ired

wor

k ex

cept

for t

he fi

nal m

achi

ning

, th

e dr

ip s

hiel

d as

sem

bly

and

liftin

g fe

atur

e as

sem

blie

s sh

all b

e fu

rnac

e he

ated

for

stre

ss re

lief a

t 110

0 °F

+/-

50 °

F fo

r a

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

08.0

B –

Ear

ly fa

ilure

of d

rip s

hiel

ds (B

SC

2005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.16

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.02

.0B

– S

tress

cor

rosi

on c

rack

ing

(SC

C)

of d

rip s

hiel

ds (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.5)

; m

inim

um o

f 2 h

ours

. To

prev

ent p

icku

p of

hy

drog

en, a

slig

htly

oxi

dizi

ng a

tmos

pher

e sh

all b

e us

ed; a

ir-co

olin

g is

allo

wed

.

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

04.0

B –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of d

rip s

hiel

ds

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; x�

Hyd

roge

n-In

duce

d C

rack

ing

of th

e D

rip S

hiel

d (S

NL

2007

[DIR

S 1

8133

9], S

ectio

n 6)

.

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

07-1

4 D

rip S

hiel

d H

andl

ing

a)

The

drip

shi

eld

shal

l be

hand

led

in

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

: ac

cord

ance

with

sta

ndar

d nu

clea

r ind

ustry

pr

actic

es to

min

imiz

e da

mag

e, s

urfa

ce

cont

amin

atio

n, e

xpos

ure

to a

dver

se

su

bsta

nces

, and

impa

cts.

b)

D

rip s

hiel

d in

stal

latio

n sh

all b

e

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

07.0

A –

Mec

hani

cal i

mpa

ct o

n w

aste

pa

ckag

e (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.13

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.08

.0B

– E

arly

failu

re o

f drip

shi

elds

(BSC

20

05 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

16).

cont

rolle

d an

d m

onito

red

thro

ugh

appr

opria

te e

quip

men

t to

min

imiz

e po

ssib

le

was

te p

acka

ge/d

rip s

hiel

d da

mag

e an

d/or

m

isin

stal

latio

n. In

stal

latio

n sh

all i

nclu

de th

e us

e of

equ

ipm

ent w

ith a

n al

arm

, an

oper

ator

, and

an

inde

pend

ent c

heck

er.

Rec

ords

dem

onst

ratin

g co

mpl

ianc

e sh

all b

e m

aint

aine

d.

57 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

07-1

5 D

rip S

hiel

d Th

erm

al

Exp

ansi

on C

onst

rain

t To

acc

ount

for v

olum

e in

crea

se o

f cor

rosi

on

prod

ucts

the

drip

shi

eld

shal

l not

be

cons

train

ed la

tera

lly o

r lon

gitu

dina

lly, o

r rig

idly

mou

nted

to th

e in

vert.

Drip

shi

eld

conn

ecto

rs s

hall

be d

esig

ned

to a

llow

th

erm

al e

xpan

sion

with

out b

indi

ng to

30

0 °C

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.11.

07.0

A –

The

rmal

exp

ansi

on/s

tress

of i

n-dr

ift E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.69

).

07-1

6 A

s-em

plac

ed W

aste

Th

e in

terfa

ce c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm fo

r the

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Con

figur

atio

n –

Was

te

Pac

kage

/Drip

Shi

eld

Cle

aran

ce [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

Par

amet

ers]

min

imum

dis

tanc

e fro

m to

p-of

-was

te

pack

age

to in

terio

r-hei

ght-o

f-drip

-shi

eld

is

the

Em

plac

emen

t Drif

t Con

figur

atio

n an

d E

nviro

nmen

t IE

D(s

).

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

A –

Sei

smic

gro

und

mot

ion

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

3);

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

B –

Sei

smic

-indu

ced

rock

fall

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

3.07

.0B

– M

echa

nica

l im

pact

on

drip

shi

eld

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.14

); x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

7.01

.0A

– R

ockf

all (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S

1749

95],

Sec

tion

6.2.

22);

x� F

EP

2.1

.07.

01.0

A –

Roc

kfal

l (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

5014

], S

ectio

n 6.

2.28

). C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

x� IE

D E

mpl

acem

ent D

rift C

onfig

urat

ion

and

Env

ironm

ent

(BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8041

2]).

07-1

7 [D

elet

ed.]

58 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

EMPL

AC

EMEN

T PA

LLET

08

-01

E

mpl

acem

ent P

alle

t D

esig

n [C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

Par

amet

ers]

The

inte

rface

con

trol m

echa

nism

for t

he

empl

acem

ent p

alle

t dim

ensi

ons

and

char

acte

ristic

s is

the

Em

plac

emen

t Pal

let

IED

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

A –

Mec

hani

cal d

egra

datio

n of

em

plac

emen

t pal

let (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

21);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

C –

Che

mic

al d

egra

datio

n of

em

plac

emen

t pal

let (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

23);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

07.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal e

ffect

s at

EB

S

com

pone

nt in

terfa

ces

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.27

). C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

x�

IE

D E

mpl

acem

ent P

alle

t (B

SC

200

7 [D

IRS

180

445]

).

08-0

2

Em

plac

emen

t Pal

let

Fu

nctio

n Fo

r the

des

ign

stat

ic lo

ad, t

he e

mpl

acem

ent

palle

t sha

ll m

aint

ain

the

was

te p

acka

ge

empl

acem

ent n

omin

al p

ositi

on fo

r at l

east

30

0 ye

ars,

and

mai

ntai

n a

nom

inal

ly

ho

rizon

tal w

aste

pac

kage

em

plac

emen

t for

10,0

00 y

ears

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

yses

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

A –

Mec

hani

cal d

egra

datio

n of

em

plac

emen

t pal

let (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

21);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

C –

Che

mic

al d

egra

datio

n of

em

plac

emen

t pal

let (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

23);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

07.0

B –

Mec

hani

cal e

ffect

s at

EB

S

com

pone

nt in

terfa

ces

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.27

).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 59

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

08-0

3

Em

plac

emen

t Pal

let

a) T

he in

terfa

ce c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm fo

r the

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Fabr

icat

ion

and

Cor

rosi

on A

llow

ance

[C

ontro

lled

Inte

rface

P

aram

eter

s –

Item

a)

only

] [In

form

atio

n O

nly

–Ite

ms

d), e

) and

f)on

ly]

empl

acem

ent p

alle

t mat

eria

l pro

perti

es

is t

he E

mpl

acem

ent P

alle

t IE

D

b) T

he e

mpl

acem

ent p

alle

t sha

ll be

fa

bric

ated

of A

lloy

22 p

late

s an

d sq

uare

st

ainl

ess

stee

l tub

es

c)

The

con

tact

s be

twee

n th

e w

aste

pa

ckag

e an

d em

plac

emen

t pal

let s

hall

x� F

EP

1.2

.03.

02.0

A –

Sei

smic

gro

und

mot

ion

dam

ages

E

BS

com

pone

nts

(BSC

200

5 [D

IRS

173

981]

, S

ectio

n 6.

2.1.

3);

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

A –

Mec

hani

cal d

egra

datio

n of

em

plac

emen

t pal

let (

BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

Sec

tion

6.2.

21);

be A

lloy

22.

x� F

EP

2.1

.06.

05.0

C –

Che

mic

al d

egra

datio

n of

d)

The

cor

rosi

on a

llow

ance

for t

he A

lloy

22

empl

acem

ent p

alle

t (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

175

014]

, co

mpo

nent

s sh

all b

e at

leas

t 2 m

m.

Sec

tion

6.2.

23).

e)

The

cor

rosi

on a

llow

ance

for t

he s

tain

less

C

urre

nt c

ontro

l mec

hani

sm:

stee

l com

pone

nts

shal

l be

at le

ast 2

mm

. f)

The

mec

hani

cal p

rope

rties

at 1

50°

C o

r x�

IED

Em

plac

emen

t Pal

let (

BS

C 2

007

[DIR

S 1

8044

5]).

high

er s

hall

be u

sed

for p

ostc

losu

re

anal

ysis

.

08-0

4 E

BS

Mat

eria

ls

EB

S m

ater

ials

sha

ll be

iner

t rel

ativ

e to

eac

h R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Inte

ract

ions

–

Em

plac

emen

t Pal

let

Fu

nctio

n

othe

r so

that

phy

sica

l con

tact

bet

wee

n E

BS

m

ater

ials

min

imiz

es d

issi

mila

r mat

eria

l in

tera

ctio

n m

echa

nism

s. T

he E

mpl

acem

ent

Pal

let s

hall

be d

esig

ned

such

that

, for

the

nom

inal

sce

nario

(e.g

. not

sei

smic

or

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

04.0

A –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of w

aste

pa

ckag

es (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

995]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

8);

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

04.0

B –

Hyd

ride

crac

king

of d

rip s

hiel

ds

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5], S

ectio

n 6.

2.9)

; ig

neou

s), t

he w

aste

pac

kage

out

er c

orro

sion

x�

FE

P 2

.1.0

6.07

.0A

– C

hem

ical

effe

cts

at E

BS

ba

rrier

sha

ll no

t con

tact

EB

S c

ompo

nent

s co

mpo

nent

inte

rface

s (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7501

4],

othe

r tha

n th

e A

lloy

22 s

uppo

rt su

rface

s of

S

ectio

n 6.

2.26

). th

e pa

llet.

60 o

f 70

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

08

-05

Was

te P

acka

ge a

nd

Em

plac

emen

t Pal

let

Sta

tic S

tress

es

Fo

r the

nom

inal

sce

nario

em

plac

emen

t co

nfig

urat

ion,

the

tens

ile s

tress

es im

pose

d on

the

allo

y 22

com

pone

nts

of b

oth

the

was

te p

acka

ge a

nd th

e em

plac

emen

t pal

let

shal

l be

less

than

257

MP

a (th

e

appr

oxim

ate

stre

ss c

orro

sion

cra

ckin

g th

resh

old

for a

lloy

22).

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.03.

02.0

A –

Stre

ss C

orro

sion

Cra

ckin

g (S

CC

) of

was

te p

acka

ges

(BS

C 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7499

5],

Sec

tion

6.2.

4).

Not

e: T

his

deriv

ed in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as

been

dev

elop

ed a

s an

agr

eed

upon

eng

inee

ring-

sc

ient

ific

inte

rface

con

stra

int t

o ad

dres

s no

n-sp

ecifi

c FE

P d

iscu

ssio

ns in

a m

anne

r tha

t can

be

inco

rpor

ated

in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir

impl

emen

tatio

n.

CLO

SUR

E 09

-01

Clo

sure

of S

hafts

and

Ram

ps

Clo

sure

of t

he s

hafts

sha

ll in

clud

e ba

ckfil

ling

for t

he e

ntire

dep

th o

f the

ope

ning

. Clo

sure

of

ram

ps s

hall

incl

ude

back

fillin

g al

ong

the

entir

e le

ngth

of t

he o

peni

ng.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

2.1

.05.

01.0

A –

Flo

w th

roug

h se

als

(acc

ess

ram

ps

and

vent

ilatio

n sh

afts

) (B

SC 2

005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1],

Sec

tion

6.3.

6);

x� F

EP

2.3

.09.

01.0

A –

Ani

mal

bur

row

ing/

intru

sion

(BS

C

2005

[DIR

S 1

7410

7], S

ectio

n 6.

2.23

).

Not

e: W

ith re

gard

to b

ackf

illing

of r

amps

, thi

s de

rived

in

tern

al c

onst

rain

t sta

tem

ent h

as b

een

deve

lope

d as

an

agre

ed u

pon

engi

neer

ing-

scie

ntifi

c in

terfa

ce c

onst

rain

t to

addr

ess

non-

spec

ific

FEP

dis

cuss

ions

in a

man

ner t

hat

can

be in

corp

orat

ed in

to te

chni

cal d

esig

ns a

nd v

erifi

ed

thro

ugh

thei

r im

plem

enta

tion.

09-0

2 [D

elet

ed]

09-0

3 C

losu

re o

f Bor

ehol

es

Site

inve

stig

atio

n bo

reho

les

with

in o

r nea

r th

e fo

otpr

int o

f the

repo

sito

ry b

lock

will

be

back

fille

d w

ith m

ater

ial c

ompa

tible

with

the

host

rock

and

plu

gged

.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

anal

ysis

:

x� F

EP

1.1

.01.

01.0

A –

Ope

n si

te in

vest

igat

ion

bore

hole

s (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.3.

1).

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 61

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08

Post

clos

ure

Mod

elin

g an

d A

naly

ses

Des

ign

Para

met

ers

No.

Pa

ram

eter

D

eriv

ed In

tern

al C

onst

rain

t Po

stcl

osur

e B

asis

09-0

4 R

ecla

mat

ion

of L

ands

Land

s di

stur

bed

by th

e re

posi

tory

sha

ll be

R

epre

sent

ativ

e an

alys

es:

Dis

turb

ed b

y R

epos

itory

re

clai

med

follo

win

g th

e R

ecla

mat

ion

Im

plem

enta

tion

Pla

n (Y

MP

200

1 [D

IRS

15

4386

], S

ectio

n 1)

as

esta

blis

hed

in F

inal

E

nviro

nmen

tal I

mpa

ct S

tate

men

t for

a

Geo

logi

c R

epos

itory

for t

he D

ispo

sal o

f

x�

FE

P 1

.2.0

7.01

.0A

– E

rosi

on/d

enud

atio

n (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.5.

1);

x� F

EP

1.2

.07.

02.0

A –

Dep

ositi

on (B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

17

4191

], S

ectio

n 6.

5.2)

; S

pent

Nuc

lear

Fue

l and

Hig

h-Le

vel

x� F

EP

2.3

.11.

02.0

A –

Sur

face

Run

off a

nd F

lood

ing

Rad

ioac

tive

Was

te a

t Yuc

ca M

ount

ain,

Nye

(B

SC

200

5 [D

IRS

174

191]

, Sec

tion

6.2.

39);

Cou

nty,

Nev

ada

(DO

E 2

002

[155

970]

, x�

FE

P 2

.3.1

1.03

.0A

– In

filtra

tion

and

Rec

harg

e (B

SC

S

ectio

ns 2

.1.2

.4, 4

.1.3

.2, 4

.1.3

.3, a

nd

2005

[DIR

S 1

7419

1], S

ectio

n 6.

2.40

). 4.

1.4.

4) to

ens

ure

that

ther

e ar

e no

pr

eclo

sure

dis

turb

ance

s th

at w

ill im

pact

po

stcl

osur

e pe

rform

ance

.

TDR

-MG

R-M

D-0

0003

7 R

EV 0

2 62

of 7

0 Ja

nuar

y 20

08


7. PROPOSED RANGES FOR SELECTED PARAMETERS

As was noted previously, ongoing testing, postclosure modeling and analysis, and design evolution may establish ranges of values for controlling parameters. Selected controlling parameters, their current values, and their proposed ranges are presented in Table 2. Ranges for controlling parameters will be incorporated into Table 1 (via revision of this document) after they have been confirmed in future postclosure analyses. Note that controlling parameter ranges are not equivalent to construction tolerances. Rather, a parameter range establishes the bounds within which design may specify a parameter value and appropriate tolerances.

Table 2. Proposed Ranges of Values for Selected Parameters

No. Parameter Controlling Parameter and Current Value

Proposed Range

01-10 Emplacement Drift Configuration

Emplacement Drift Diameter: 5.5 m nominal 5.0 m to 6.0 m

01-13 Emplacement Drift Spacing

Emplacement Drift Spacing: 81 m nominal 76 m to 86 m

03-17 Waste Package Closure

Closure Weld Mass2: Less than 0.104 lb/in (18.5 g/cm) Less than 30 g/cm

2 This parameter will be expressed as Closure Weld Preparation Geometry and Weld Width in future revisions of this document.



8. INPUTS AND REFERENCES

8.1 DOCUMENTS CITED

The following is a list of the references cited in this document. The Document Input Reference System reference number appears to the left of each reference. This unique tracking number also appears in text citations for each reference, e.g.: “(CRWMS M&O 1999 [DIRS 115042]).”

101903 NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission) 1997. Standard Review Plan for Dry Cask Storage Systems. NUREG-1536. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACC: MOL.20010724.0307.

115042 CRWMS M&O (Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor) 1999. TBV-361 Resolution Analysis: Emplacement Drift Orientation. B00000000-01717-5705-00136 Rev 00. Las Vegas, Nevada: CRWMS M&O. ACC: MOL.19990802.0316.

154386 YMP (Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project) 2001. Reclamation Implementation Plan. YMP/91-14, Rev. 2. Las Vegas, Nevada: Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office. ACC: MOL.20010301.0238.

155970 DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) 2002. Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. DOE/EIS-0250. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. ACC: MOL.20020524.0314; MOL.20020524.0315; MOL.20020524.0316; MOL.20020524.0317; MOL.20020524.0318; MOL.20020524.0319; MOL.20020524.0320.

163114 Smith, D. 2003. Weld Flaw Evaluation and Nondestructive Examination Process Comparison Results for High-Level Radioactive Waste Package Manufacturing Program. TDR-EBS-ND-000007 REV 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20030515.0003.

165572 BSC (Bechtel SAIC Co., LLC) 2003. Underground Layout Configuration. 800-P0C-MGR0-00100-000-00E. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC ENG.20031002.0007; ENG.20050817.0005.

166107 BSC 2004. Drift Degradation Analysis. ANL-EBS-MD-000027 REV 03. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20040915.0010; DOC.20050419.0001; DOC.20051130.0002; DOC.20060731.0005.

168556 BSC 2004. Screening Analysis of Criticality Features, Events, and Processes for License Application. ANL-EBS-NU-000008 REV 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041022.0001.

169862 BSC 2004. Ventilation Model and Analysis Report. ANL-EBS-MD-000030 REV 04. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041025.0002.



169864 BSC 2004. Drift Scale THM Model. MDL-NBS-HS-000017 REV 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041012.0001; DOC.20060103.0002.

169988 BSC 2004. Defense HLW Glass Degradation Model. ANL-EBS-MD-000016 REV 02. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041020.0015; DOC.20050922.0002.

170019 BSC 2004. Clad Degradation – FEPs Screening Arguments. ANL-WIS-MD-000008 REV 02. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041020.0014; DOC.20060213.0007.

170020 BSC 2004. Waste Form Features, Events, and Processes. ANL-WIS-MD-000009 REV 02. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041028.0006; DOC.20050214.0004.

170021 BSC 2004. Features, Events, and Processes: System Level. ANL-WIS-MD-000019 REV 02. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041020.0009; DOC.20051206.0019.

171924 BSC 2004. Aging and Phase Stability of Waste Package Outer Barrier. ANL-EBS-MD-000002 REV 02. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20041005.0003.

172232 BSC 2005. Drift-Scale Coupled Processes (DST and TH Seepage) Models. MDL-NBS-HS-000015 REV 02. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050114.0004; DOC.20051115.0002.

173800 BSC 2005. Development of the Total System Performance Assessment-License Application Features, Events, and Processes. TDR-WIS-MD-000003 REV 02. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050829.0004.

173981 BSC 2005. Features, Events, and Processes: Disruptive Events. ANL-WIS-MD-000005 REV 03. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050830.0008.

174101 BSC 2005. Mountain-Scale Coupled Processes (TH/THC/THM) Models. MDL-NBS-HS-000007 REV 03. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050825.0007.

174107 BSC 2005. Evaluation of Features, Events, and Processes (FEP) for the Biosphere Model. ANL-MGR-MD-000011 Rev 05. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050718.0006.

174190 BSC 2005. Features, Events, and Processes in SZ Flow and Transport. ANL-NBS-MD-000002 REV 04. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050822.0012.



174191 BSC 2005. Features, Events, and Processes in UZ Flow and Transport. ANL-NBS-MD-000001 REV 04. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050809.0002.

174995 BSC 2005. Screening of Features, Events, and Processes in Drip Shield and Waste Package Degradation. ANL-EBS-PA-000002 REV 05. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050817.0003; DOC.20050826.0002; DOC.20050929.0007.

175014 BSC 2005. Engineered Barrier System Features, Events, and Processes. ANL-WIS-PA-000002 REV 05. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20050829.0003; DOC.20050830.0006.

176828 SNL (Sandia National Laboratories) 2007. Seismic Consequence Abstraction. MDL-WIS-PA-000003 REV 03. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20070928.0011.

177404 SNL 2007. Drift-Scale THC Seepage Model. MDL-NBS-HS-000001 REV 05. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20071010.0004.

177407 SNL 2007. EBS Radionuclide Transport Abstraction. ANL-WIS-PA-000001 REV 03. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20071004.0001.

177422 SNL 2007. MOX Spent Nuclear Fuel and LaBS Glass for TSPA-LA. ANL-WIS-MD-000022 REV 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20070220.0007.

177432 SNL 2007. Number of Waste Packages Hit by Igneous Events. ANL-MGR-GS-000003 REV 03. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20071002.0001.

178277 BSC 2007. IED Geotechnical and Thermal Parameters II [Sheet 1 of 1]. 800-IED-MGR0-00402-000-00A. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070108.0001.

178519 SNL 2007. General Corrosion and Localized Corrosion of Waste Package Outer Barrier. ANL-EBS-MD-000003 REV 03. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20070730.0003; DOC.20070807.0007.

178765 SNL 2007. Analysis of Mechanisms for Early Waste Package/Drip Shield Failure. ANL-EBS-MD-000076 REV 00. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20070629.0002; DOC.20071003.0015.



178796 BSC 2007. IED Geotechnical and Thermal Parameters III [Sheet 1 of 1]. 800-IED-MGR0-00403-000-00A. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070125.0017; ENG.20070322.0012.

179278 BSC 2007. IED Seismic Data. 800-IED-MGR0-00701-000 REV 00A. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070216.0003.

179349 DOE 2006. Preliminary Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister System Performance Specification. WMO-TADCS-000001 REV B. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. ACC: DOC.20070301.0004.

179808 BSC 2007. IED Geotechnical and Thermal Parameters IV [Sheet 1 of 1]. 800-IED-MGR0-00404-000-00A. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SIAC Company. ACC: ENG.20070125.0018.

179927 BSC 2007. IED Subsurface Facilities Layout Geographical Data. 800-IED-WIS0-01701-000-00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070326.0017.

179928 BSC 2007. IED Geotechnical and Thermal Parameters. 800-IED-MGR0-00401-000 REV 00G. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070601.0020.

180412 BSC 2007. IED Emplacement Drift Configuration and Environment. 800-IED-MGR0-00501-000 REV 00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070716.0006.

180444 BSC 2007. IED Interlocking Drip Shield. 800-IED-SSE0-00101-000 REV 00C. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070913.0011.

180445 BSC 2007. IED Emplacement Pallet. 800-IED-SSE0-00201-000 REV 00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070608.0007.

180449 BSC 2007. IED Waste Package Decay Heat Generation Design Basis and Thermal Information. 800-IED-WIS0-00801-000-00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070913.0013.

180503 BSC 2006. IED Waste Package Radiation Characteristics [Sheet 1 of 1]. 800-IED-WIS0-01301-000-00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20061017.0004.

180940 BSC 2007. IED Subsurface Facilities Committed Materials. 800-IED-WIS0-01501-000-00C. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20071022.0026.



181267 SNL 2007. Analysis of Dust Deliquescence for FEP Screening. ANL-EBS-MD-000074 REV 01 AD 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20070911.0004; DOC.20070824.0001.

181339 SNL 2007. Hydrogen-Induced Cracking of the Drip Shield. ANL-EBS-MD-000006 REV 02 ADD 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20060306.0007; DOC.20070807.0005.

181383 SNL 2007. Multiscale Thermohydrologic Model. ANL-EBS-MD-000049 REV 03 ADD 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20070831.0003; LLR.20071120.0083.

181648 SNL 2007. In-Drift Natural Convection and Condensation. MDL-EBS-MD-000001 REV 00 AD 01. Las Vegas, Nevada: Sandia National Laboratories. ACC: DOC.20050330.0001; DOC.20051122.0005; DOC.20070907.0004.

182746 BSC 2007. IED Emplacement Drift Invert. 800-IED-MGR0-00601-000 REV 00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20071120.0004.

182926 BSC 2007. IED Subsurface Facilities Geological Data. 800-IED-WIS0-01801-000-00C. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070913.0012.

182927 BSC 2007. IED Subsurface Facilities Ground Support Configuration. 800-IED-WIS0-01601-000-00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20071120.0004.

182928 BSC 2007. IED Waste Package Configuration. 800-IED-WIS0-02101-000 REV 00B. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070926.0014.

183016 BSC 2007. IED Waste Package Decay Heat Generation – TSPA Modeling Basis. 800-IED-WIS0-00702-000-00A. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20071005.0024.

8.2 CODES, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS, DIRECTIVES, AND PROCEDURES

10 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 63. 2007. Energy: Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Internet accessible. [DIRS 180319]

ASME B46.1- 2002. 2003. Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay). New York, New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. TIC: 257359. [DIRS 166013]



ASTM B 575-99a. 1999. Standard Specification for Low-Carbon Nickel-Molybdenum-Chromium, Low-Carbon Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum, Low-Carbon Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum-Copper, Low-Carbon Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum-Tantalum, and Low-Carbon Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum-Tungsten Alloy Plate, Sheet, and Strip. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: American Society for Testing and Materials. TIC: 247534. [DIRS 147465]

CC-DIR-10. Rev. 1. Configuration Management Program. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20060907.0006.

CC-PRO-1001, Rev. 2. Technical Management Review Board Operations. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070403.0017.

CC-PRO-2001, Rev. 3. Technical Interface Control. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070423.0002.

EG-PRO-3DP-G03B-00001, Rev. 5. Design Process. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070904.0016.

EG-PRO-3DP-G04B-00005, Rev. 4. Configuration Management. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20070319.0012.

IT-PRO-0011, Rev. 7. Software Management. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20070905.0007.

LP-2.29Q-BSC, Rev. 2, ICN 2. Planning for Science Activities. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20070830.0006.

PA-PRO-0313, Rev. 6. Technical Reports. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20070726.0006.

PA-PRO-0601, Rev. 7. Document Review. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC:20071017.0002.

QA-DIR-10, Rev. 1. Quality Management Directive. Las Vegas, Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC.20070330.0001.

RQ-PRO-2000, Rev. 4. Managing Internal Constraints. Las Vegas Nevada: Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: DOC:20071101.0010.


Postclosure Modeling and Analyses Design …QA:QA TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 January 2008 Postclosure...

Documents

Transcript of Postclosure Modeling and Analyses Design …QA:QA TDR-MGR-MD-000037 REV 02 January 2008 Postclosure...