post-Consultation SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (Volume 6 ... · Blackwater Estuary (Mid-Essex Coast...

Volu

me

6Lower Thames CrossingPost-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report

Volume 6: Environmental Appraisal

Section 10: Appendices

Lower Thames Crossing | 2017

POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

i POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Contents

Title

Appendix 6.1 Environmental Drawings

Appendix 6.2 Engagement with Environmental Bodies

Appendix 6.3 Air Quality Results

POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES)


Appendix 6.1 - Environmental Drawings

Drawing reference Description

1 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Landscape/ Townscape Constraints

2 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Biodiversity, Historic Environment and Planning Constraints

3 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003 Internationally Designated Sites

4 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004 Air and Noise Constraints and Air Quality Modelling Receptor Locations

5 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0005 Community Land Use Constraints

6 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0006 Public Rights of Way and Cycle Routes

7 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003 Route 1 Bridge Land Take High Level Constraints

8 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004 Route 1 Bridge Land Take Water Constraints

9 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take High Level Constraints

10 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take Water Constraints

11 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take High Level Constraints

12 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take Water Constraints

Landscape / Townscape Constraints

08/08/161:75,000

L.HULME

Copyright

Pa

th:

C:\

Use

rs\lh

a7

68

46

\On

eD

rive

- A

RC

AD

IS\L

TC

\mxd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

01

.mxd

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS

HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001

© Natural England copyright 2016.

Contains Ordnance Survey data

© Crown copyright and database

rights 2016 Ordnance Survey

100030649

RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator

Original Size A3 | | |

Project LOWER THAMES

CROSSINGDrawing Title

Project No.

Date -

Client

Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd

Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park

Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479

HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN

The design shown on these drawings is illustrative

and may be subject to change in later stages of the

scheme development.

S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS

S5P02

HHJ

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

B2108

B1007

B1335

B258

B260

B2000

B1335

B2500

B188

B2174

B2175

B261

B256

B186

B149

B189

B2174

B255

B262

B1036

B1421 B1420

B148

B186

B1464

B187

B255

B3228

A228A227

A227

A225

A225

A12

A126

A226

A226

A2026

A226

A225

A1014

A226

A118

A126A126

A20

A2

A13(T)

A296

A176

A132

A124

A1235

A129

A1012

A206

A2(T)

A2(T)

A1089

A176

A128

A128

A228

A2(T)

A1014

A206

A13

A13

A2018

A1090

A127A1321

A126(T)

A12(T)

A2(T)

A226 A226

A1089(T)

A2260

A1306

A1306 A1013

A1013

A127

A127

A127

A289

A2(T)

A13(T)

A13(T)

A13

M2M20

M25

M25

M25

M25

Route 1

Route 3

Route 4

EasternSouthernLink

WesternSouthern

LinkK E N TC O U N T Y

E S S E XC O U N T Y

SEVENOAKSDISTRICT

THURROCK

BRENTWOODDISTRICT

MEDWAY

HAVERINGLONDON

BORO

BASILDONDISTRICT

GRAVESHAMDISTRICT

DARTFORDDISTRICT

0 1 2Kilometres

¯Constraints

Area of Outstanding Natural

Beauty (National value)

Green Belt (Regional value)

District Boundary

County Boundary

Route Alignments

!( Junction

S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS

Biodiversity, Historic Environment and Planning Constraints

08/08/161:75,000

L.HULME

Copyright

Pa

th:

K:\

UA

pro

jects

\UA

00

70

80

-Lo

we

r T

ha

me

s C

rossin

g\D

-Ca

lcs\G

IS\E

nvir

on

me

nta

l P

lan

nin

g\m

xd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

02

.mxd

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS


© English Heritage 2016.

© Natural England 2016.




100030649

RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator




Project No.

Date -

Client



Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479




scheme development.


S5P02

HHJ

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

Residential- Refused

Industrialuse -

Consented

Residential- Consented



Mixed use residential,retail and communityuse - Not determined

Residential withretail and leisure

- Consented



Residential withretail and communityhall - Consented

Solar PVsystem -

Consented

London GatewayLogistics Park electrical

infrastructure - Consented

Mixed use includingresidential, business,community and retailfacilities - Consented



Leisureresort - NotConsented


Demolition andresidential development

- ConsentedRedevelopmentfor residentialuse - Consented

Residentialand floorspacefor communityand health use -Status Unknown

Redevelopmentfor emploment

use - Consented

New secondaryschool -

Consented

Time limit extensionfor residential

development - Consented

Demolition and redevelopmentfor residential use- Consented


Solar farm- Consented

Windturbines -

Consented



Solar farm- Consented Solar

farm -Consented

Sand and gravelextraction -Consented

Sand and gravelextraction -Consented

Processingplant -Refused

Residentialwith commercialfloorspace andassociated works- Not Consented

Residentialwith commercialfloorspace andassociated works- Not Consented

Demolition andresidential, primaryschool, retail andassociated works

- Consented

Demolition andresidential, primaryschool, retailand associated works- Consented

Extension to clubhouse and newdriving range- Consented

Demolition andredevelopmentfo strategic rail

freight interchange -Not Determined

Redevelopmentfor storage and

distribution usesand associated

works - ConsentedDetails for

redevelopmentfor employmentand mixed uses

- Consented

Security ditch- ConsentedRemediation

works -Consented

Solar park- Refused

New countrypark - Not

determined

Duck farm andanaerobic digestion

plant - Not consented

Business /industrial, storageand distribution -

Consented

Mixed use includingresidential,

retail office use- Not determined

Hotel -Consented

Crematorium, cemeteryand memorial gardens -Consented


Residentialincluding doctor's

surgery - Consented

Recyclingcentre -

Consented

Import ofmaterials -Consented

Residential -Not consented



Solarfarm - Not

determinedSolar farm -

Not determined

Residential includingcommunity use and doctorssurgery - Consented

Ecologypark -

Consented

Residential, includinghealth centre and

commercial floorspace- Not determined

EIA ScreeningOpinion Solar Farm- Not determined

Woodland, recreationand amenity use- Not determined


Residentialand non-residentialfloorspace includingeducation and communityfacilities - Consented

Redevelopmentincluding new

academy buildingand sports centre

- Consented

Extension andalterations to shopping

centre - Not Determined


Materialimportation -

Not Consented

Leachatedisposal plant

- Not Consented


Shopping centreextension and associatedworks - Not Determined

Shopping centreextension and associatedworks - Not Determined


Residential- Not

Consented

Residential -Not Consented


Residential -EIA Screening

Residential -Not Consented

Expansion ofport facilities- EIA Scoping

New school building andassociated development

- Consented


Demolition andredevelopmentfor new office,warehouse and

shed - Consented

Memorial Park- Consented

Solar Farm- Not Consented

Church OfSt Mary

Causewayed enclosure and Anglo-Saxon

cemetery 500m ENE of Heath Place

Roman barrow 260mnorth east of South

Ockendon Hall

Bowl barrowin Ashenbank Wood

south of CobhamPark reservoir

Earthworks nearchurch, West

Tilbury

Gatehouse andmoat of South Ockenden

Old Hall

Second World Waranti-aircraft batteryat Bowaters Farm

Bishop Bonner'sPalace, Orsett

TilburyFort

Coalhouse Fortbattery and

artillery defences

EastTilburyBattery

Springfield styleenclosure and Iron

Age enclosuressouth of Hill House,

Baker Street.

Crop markcomplex, Orsett

CobhamHall

ThamesEstuary &Marshes


South ThamesEstuary and

Marshes

West ThurrockLagoon &Marshes

Route 4

Route 3

Eastern Southern Link

Western Southern Link

Route 1

Former Gateway at Groves Barns

THURROCK

BRENTWOODDISTRICT

HAVERINGLONDON

BORO BASILDONDISTRICT

GRAVESHAMDISTRICT

DARTFORDDISTRICT

ThamesEstuary

ThamesEstuary

ThamesEstuary

ThamesEstuary

B2108

B1007

B1335

B258

B260

B1335

B188

B2174

B2175

B261

B1464

B186

B189

B2174

B262

B1421

B149

B1420

B148

B186

B187

B255

B3228

A20

A227

A227

A127

A127

A127

A225

A225

A12

A226

A226

A2026

A225

A228

A1014

A118

A126

A2

A296

A176

A124

A129

A176 A1235

A1012

A206

A2(T)

A2(T)

A1089

A132

A1023

A176

A128

A128

A128

A2(T)A2(T)

A206

A13

A13

A2018

A1090

A1321

A126(T)

A226A226

A1089(T)

A2(T)

A1306

A1306A1013

A1013

A176

A289

A12(T)

A13(T)

A13(T)

A13

M2

M25

M20

M25

M25

M25

Residential- Not

Determined

Residential -Not Determined

SolarPark - EIAScreening

Residential -EIA Screening

Solar Park- Consented

0 1 2Kilometres

¯

Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGrade I Listed Building(National value)

Grade II* Listed Building(National value)

Grade II Listed Building(Regional value)

Scheduled Monument(National value)

Registered Parks and Garden(National value)

Conservation Area(National - Local value)

Local Historic Landscape(Local value)

Ecological ConstraintsRamsar (International value)

Special Area of Conservation(International value)

Special Protection Area(International value)

Ancient Woodland(National value)

Site of Special ScientificInterest (National value)

Recommended MarineConservation Zone (National value)

Local Nature Reserve (Local value)

Local Wildlife Site (Local value)

Public Open Space (Barking & Dagenham)

Major Planned DevelopmentBasildon

Bexley

Brentwood

Dartford

Gravesham

Havering

Maidstone

Medway

Thurrock

Tonbridge and Malling

Landscape and Visual AmenityConstraints



!( Junction

Route Alignments

District Boundary

County Boundary

S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR ASS5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS

InternationallyDesignated Sites

08/08/161:350,000

L.HULME

Copyright

Pa

th:

C:\

Use

rs\lh

a7

68

46

\On

eD

rive

- A

RC

AD

IS\L

TC

\mxd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

03

.mxd

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS






100030649

RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator




Project No.

Date -

Client



Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479




scheme development.


S5P02

HHJ

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

LeeValley

(Ramsar)

LeeValley(SPA)

Route 4

Route 1

Route 3

Western Southern Link

Eastern Southern Link

Benfleet andSouthend Marshes

(Ramsar)

Blackwater Estuary(Mid-Essex Coast

Phase 4)(Ramsar)

Crouch & Roach Estuaries(Mid-Essex Coast Phase 3)

(Ramsar)

Foulness (Mid-EssexCoast Phase 5)

(Ramsar)

Lee Valley(Ramsar)

LeeValley(Ramsar)

Medway Estuary &Marshes(Ramsar)

The Swale(Ramsar)

Thames Estuary& Marshes(Ramsar)

Benfleet andSouthend Marshes(SPA)

Blackwater Estuary(Mid-Essex Coast

Phase 4)(SPA)

Crouch & Roach Estuaries(Mid-Essex Coast Phase 3)

(SPA)

Foulness (Mid-EssexCoast Phase 5)

(SPA)

LeeValley(SPA)

LeeValley(SPA)

Medway Estuary &Marshes

(SPA)

TheSwale(SPA)

Thames Estuary& Marshes

(SPA)

Outer ThamesEstuary

(SPA)

North DownsWoodlands

(SAC)

North DownsWoodlands

(SAC)

EssexEstuaries

(SAC)

Peters Pit(SAC) Queendown

Warren(SAC)

Epping Forest(SAC)

HolehavenCreek(pSPA)

0 4 8 12 16Kilometres

¯

Route Alignments

!( Junction

30km buffer around study area

Ramsar (International value)

Special Area of Conservation

(International value)

Special Protection Area


Proposed Special Protection Area


S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR ASS5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS

Air a nd No ise Co nstra ints a nd Air Qua lity M o d elling Rec epto r Lo c a tio ns

08/08/161:75,000L.HU LM E

Co pyright

Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-Lower Thames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environmental Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004.mxd

S.RIM ELLA.SAU NDERS

HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-M P-EN-0004

© Cro wn c o pyright a nd d a ta b a se rights lic ensedund er Defra 's Pub lic Secto r M a pping Agreem entwith Ord na nc e Survey (lic enc e No .100022861)a nd the La nd a nd Pro perty Servic es Depa rtm ent(No rthern Irela nd ) M OU 206. Co nta ins Ord na nc e Survey d a ta © Cro wnc o pyright a nd d a ta b a se rights 2016 Ord na nc eSurvey 100030649

Revisio nSta tus

Sc a le

Dra wn ByChec ked ByAppro ved By

Dra wing Num b er

PINHA | Origina to rOrigina l Size A3

| | |

Pro ject LOW ER T HAM ESCROSSING

Dra wing T itle

Pro ject No .

Da te -

Client

Rev Sta tus Rev. Da te Purpo se o f revisio n Dra wn Chc k'd Apprv'd

Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurd ero p Pa rk

Swind o n, SN4 0QDT el. +44(0)1793 812479 HA540039ILLUSTRATIVE

DESIGNT he d esign sho wn o n these d ra wings is illustra tive a nd m a y b e sub jec t to c ha nge in la ter sta ges o f the sc hem e d evelo pm ent.

S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSU E LH SR AS

S5 P02

HHJ

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

XWXWXW XWXWXWXW

XWXWXWXWXWXWXWXW

XW

XWXW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW XWXW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW XW

XW XWXW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XWXW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

XW

")

")

")

")

")

")

")")

")

")

THURROCK

BRENTWOODDISTRICT

HAVERINGLONDON BORO

BASILDONDISTRICT

GRAVESHAMDISTRICT

DARTFORDDISTRICT

B2108

B1007

B1335

B258

B260

B1335

B188

B2174

B2175

B261

B1464

B186

B149

B2000

B189

B2174

B255

B262

B1036

B1421 B1420

B148

B186

B187

B255

B3228

A227

A227

A225

A225

A12

A126

A226

A226

A2

A2026

A129

A228

A225

A1014

A226

A118

A126A126

A20

A226

A296

A176

A124

A1235

A1012

A206

A2(T)

A2(T)

A1089

A176

A128

A128

A2(T)

A1014

A206

A13

A13

A2018

A1090

A127A1321

A2(T)

A226 A226

A132

A1089(T)

A2260

A1306

A1306A1013

A1013

A127

A127

A127

A289

A13(T)

A13(T)

A13

M2

M25

M20

M25

M25

M25

R1R2 R4

R16

R17

R18

R19

R20

R21

R22

R23

R24

R25 R26R27

R28

R29R30

R31

R32

R33

R34

R35

R36

R37 R38

R39 R40R42

R43

R45 R44

R46R47

R49

R51

R50

R52

R53R54

R55

R56

R61

R62

R63

R64

R67R68

R70

R73

R74

R75

R76

R81

R82

R83

R85

R48

R86

R89

R87

R88

Ro ute 1

Ro ute 3

Ro ute 4

Ea sternSo uthernLink

W esternSo uthern

Link

R103

R104

R108R107

R105

R106

R100R101

R102

R109

K E N TC O U N T Y


0 1 2Kilo m etres

¯

Air Quality ConstraintsDefra 's Na tio na l Po llutio n Clim a teM a pping (PCM ) m o d el netwo rkBa sild o n Distric t Co unc il Air Qua lityM a na gem ent Area (AQM A)Da rtfo rd Bo ro ugh Co unc il AQM AGra vesha m Bo ro ugh Co unc il AQM ALo nd o n Bo ro ugh o f Bexley AQM ALo nd o n Bo ro ugh o f Ha vering AQM AM ed wa y Co unc il AQM ASeveno a ks Distric t Co unc il AQM AT hurro c k Co unc il AQM A

District Bo und a ryCo unty Bo und a ry

Air Quality FeaturesXW Air Qua lity M o d elling Rec epto rs ") Ad d itio na l Air Qua lity M o d elling Rec epto rs!(Nitro gen d io xid e d iffusio n tub ec o nc entra tio n less tha n 36 µg/m 3

!(Nitro gen d io xid e d iffusio n tub ec o nc entra tio n 36 – 40 µg/m 3

!(Nitro gen d io xid e d iffusio n tub ec o nc entra tio n grea ter tha n 40 µg/m 3

#*Nitro gen d io xid e a uto m a tic m o nito ringc o nc entra tio n grea ter tha n 40 µg/m 3

#*Nitro gen d io xid e a uto m a tic m o nito ringc o nc entra tio n less tha n 36 µg/m 3

Noise ConstraintsNo ise Im po rta nt Area

No te: All d iffusio n tub e a nd a uto m a tic m o nito ring d a tais fro m 2014 fo r a ll sites

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

XWXW

XWXW

XWXW

XW

XWXW

XWXW

XWXW

XWXW

XW

XW

XW

M25A282

WatlingStreet

CottonLane

R9

R11

R13

R15

R1R2

R3 R4R5

R6R7

R8

R10

R12R14

R41

R46

S5P02 08/08/16Po st Co nsulta tio n SAR Issue LH SR AS

Community Land Use Constraints

08/08/161:75,000

L.HULME

Copyright

Pa

th:

K:\

UA

pro

jects

\UA

00

70

80

-Lo

we

r T

ha

me

s C

rossin

g\D

-Ca

lcs\G

IS\E

nvir

on

me

nta

l P

lan

nin

g\m

xd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

05

.mxd

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS



Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright

and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey

100030649.

Data reproduced with the permission of RSPB.

© Crown Copyright. Ordnance Survey licence

number 100021787 2016

RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator




Project No.

Date -

Client



Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479




scheme development.


S5P02

HHJ

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

TilburyFootballGround

ThurrockFootballGround

Lakeside RetailPark

RidingSchool

WoodlandsPrep School

AveleyPrimarySchool

HolidayInn

DartfordAmbulance

Station

Winners ChapelInternational

St Peter'sChurch of

England

All SaintsChurch

TravelodgeHotel

TreetopsSchool

WoodsidePrimarySchool

Chadwell StMary Day Nursery Riverview

Methodist Church

St MarysCemetery

Manor Infantand NurserySchool

Tilbury ManorJunior School

Palmer'sCollege

ShorneMethodist

Church

Shorne C ofE Primary

School

Church of St Mary

Davy DownRiverside Park

Fieldsof Peace

MardykeGolfClub

Top MeadowGolf Club

Dunton HillsFamily Golf

Centre

South Essex GolfCourse

CranhamGolf Course

Thurrock ThamesideNature Park

OrsettGolf Course

St CleresHall Golf Club

KoalaPark

Mackenzie WayOpen

Space

ThamesValley GolfCentre Driving Range

Southern ValleyGolfClub

Rochester andCobham Park

Golf Club

Route 4

Route 3

Eastern Southern

Link

Western Southern

Link

Route 1

DuntonPlotlands

Littlebrook NaturePark

Memorial Park,Chalk

Condover's ScoutActivity Camp

DilkesPark

The GatewayAcademy

Claylane Wood

Langdon Hills Golfand Country Club Hotel

Residential includingpotential health facility

Residential includinghotel and retail uses

Residential including communityand health facilities

Residential includingpublic open space

Leisure resort

Mixed use including residential,community and health uses.

The LeighAcademy

Dartford BridgeCommunity

Primary School

Joyce GreenCemetery

St Michael's Church

Aveley Christian Centre

Secondary Schooland Learning Centre

Belhus ParkGolf Club

Premier InnChaffordGorgesNature Park

St Mary'sChurch

Park Inn atRadisson

WilliamEdwards Academy

School

Terrels HeathRecreation Ground

The Winning Child Nursery

St Mary Magdalene the ParishChurch of North Ockendon

Sports Club

Arena EssexRaceway

Lakeside Karting Caravan Park

Orsett Fen

ShorneMarshes

CliffePools

RainhamMarshes

SouthEssex

Marshes

SouthEssex

Marshes

BushyBit

Hangman's Wood

Mardyke Woods

Dilkes Wood

Oakwoodand Ash

Plantation

Brick Kiln Wood,Running Water Woodand Whitehall Wood

BroomHill Hangmans

Wood

LinfordWood

WarleyHall Wood

OldHouseWood

TheWarren

Starmore Wood

Cole Wood

GreatCrabbles

WoodPuckle

Hill

CodhamHall Wood

ThamesChaseForest

The OldPark

Gurnett'sFields

BelhusChase

AshenbankWood

B2108

B1007

B258

B260

B1335

B2500

B188

B2174

B2175

B261

B256

B1464

B185

B186

B2186

B149

B189

B2174

B255

B262

B1036

B1421

B1420

B148

B186

B2173

B187

B255

B3228

A2

A20

A227

A227

A225

A225

A12

A126

A226

A226

A129

A2026

A226

A1023

A225

A228

A1014

A118

A126

A126

A296

A176

A226

A124

A176 A1235

A176

A1012

A206

A176

A2(T)

A2(T)

A1089

A132

A128

A128

A2(T)

A1014

A2(T)

A2(T)

A206

A13

A13

A2018

A1090

A127

A1321

A126(T)

A2(T)

A226 A226

A2260

A1089(T)

A1306

A1306

A1013

A1013

A289

A12(T)

A127

A127

A127

A2(T)

A13(T)

A13(T)

A13(T)

A13

M2M25

M25

M20

M25

M25

Residential withretail and

leisure - Consented

Residential withretail and community

hall - Consented

New secondaryschool - Consented

Demolition andresidential, primary

school, retailand associated

works - Consented

Demolition andresidential, primary

school, retailand associated

works - Consented

Details forredevelopmentfor employmentand mixed uses

- Consented

New countrypark - Not

determined

Crematorium,cemetery and memorial

gardens - Not determined

Residential includingcommunity use and doctors

surgery - Consented

Residential, includinghealth centre and

commercial floorspace- Not determined

Woodland, recreationand amenity use- Not determined

Redevelopmentincluding new

academy buildingand sports centre

- Consented

Mixed use includingresidential, business,community and retailfacilities - Consented

Leisure resort- Not Consented

Residential -Consented

Mixed use residential,

retail and community

use - Not determined

K E N TC O U N T Y


SEVENOAKSDISTRICT

THURROCK

BRENTWOODDISTRICT

MEDWAY

HAVERINGLONDON BORO

BASILDONDISTRICT

GRAVESHAMDISTRICT

DARTFORDDISTRICT

BEXLEYLONDON

BORO

0 1 2Kilometres

¯! Community Facilities Point

Community Land

Use Facilities

Country Park

Parks, Open Spaces

and Golf Courses

Woodland

Woodland Trust Site

RSPB Reserve

Open Access Land

District Boundary

County Boundary

Route Alignments

!( Junction


Belhus Park

NewTown

S ite of m oa ted m a nor house E of S t Micha el's Church, Aveley

Purfleet Chalk Pits

West ThurrockLagoon & Marshes

SheepfoldWood

Ca t’s Mede

Brickb a rn W oodHa ngm a n's W ood

W a tt’s W ood

Belhus Pa rk Ea st

Ma rdykeLW S

Oa k W ood

Low W ell W ood

W est T hurrockR eedb ed

Arena Essex

Little Dilkes W oodMilla rd's Ga rden/Bra nnett’s W ood

W a rren GorgeClockhouse Cliff

Mortua ry Cha pel in W a tling S treet Cem etery

S a int Micha el'sChurch

AveleyHa ll

Pa rk Corner House

South Ockendon Mardyke

Valley

West Thurrock GRAYS

DARTFORD Fleet Downs

River Thames

Queen Eliza b eth II Bridge

Purfleet

Lakeside Shopping

Centre

SWANSCOMBEStone

A282

Bluewater

A13

M25

Anglo-S a xon cem etery a t Da renth Pa rk

Aveley

Grays Thurrock Chalk Pit

ThamesEstuary

¯

Major Planned DevelopmentDevelopm ent Bounda ry

Ecological ConstraintsFunctiona l Ha b ita t (Interna tiona l va lue)Ancient W oodla nd(Na tiona l va lue)S ite of S pecia l S cientific Interest (Na tiona l va lue)R ecom m ended Ma rineConserva tion Z one (Na tiona l va lue)Loca l Na ture R eserve (Loca l va lue)Loca l W ildlife S ite (Loca l va lue)

Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGra de I Listed Building(Na tiona l va lue)Gra de II* Listed Building(Na tiona l va lue)Gra de II Listed Building(R egiona l va lue)S cheduled Monum ent(Na tiona l va lue)R egistered Pa rks a nd Ga rden(Na tiona l va lue)Conserva tion Area(Na tiona l - Loca l va lue)

Land TakePerm a nent

R oute 1 Bridge La nd T a ke

High Level Constra ints

08/08/161:35,000L.HU LME

Copyright

Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-Lower Thames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environmental Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003.mxd

S .R IMELLA.S AU NDER S

HHJ-EGN-AD0Z Z Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0003

© English Herita ge 2016. © Na tura l Engla nd 2016. Conta ins Ordna nce S urvey da ta © Crowncopyright a nd da ta b a se rights 2016Ordna nce S urvey 100030649

R evisionS ta tus

S ca le

Dra wn ByChecked ByApproved By

Dra wing Num b er

PINHA | Origina torOrigina l S ize A3

| | |

Project LOW ER T HAMESCR OS S ING

Dra wing T itle

Project No.

Da te -

Client

R ev S ta tus R ev. Da te Purpose of revision Dra wn Chck'd Apprv'd

Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Pa rk

S windon, S N4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479 HA540039ILLUSTRATIVE

DESIGNT he design shown on these dra wings is illustra tive a nd m a y b e sub ject to cha nge in la ter sta ges of the schem e developm ent.

S 5P01 18/01/16 S AR IS S U E LH S R AS

S 5 P02

HHJ

0 1 2K ilom etres

S 5P02 08/08/16Post Consulta tion S AR Issue LH S R AS

Route 1 Bridge Land Take

Water Constraints

08/08/161:30,000

L.HULME

Copyright

Pa

th:

K:\

UA

pro

jects

\UA

00

70

80

-Lo

we

r T

ha

me

s C

rossin

g\D

-Ca

lcs\G

IS\E

nvir

on

me

nta

l P

lan

nin

g\m

xd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-AD

0Z

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

04

.mxd

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS

HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004

© Environment Agency copyright 2016. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crowncopyright and database rights 2016Ordnance Survey 100030649

RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator




Project No.

Date -

Client



Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479


The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the scheme development.


S5P02

HHJ

0 1 2Kilometres

West Thurrock

Marshes

Stone

Marshes

West Thurrock

Main Sewer

Littlebrook

Nature Park

River Mardyke

Recommended Marine

Conservation Zone (rMCZ)

River Thames

0 1 2Kilometres

¯

Water ConstraintsDetailed river network

Flood defence

WFD river waterbodiesCycle2 (Draft)

Area benefitting fromflood defences

Authorised landfill site

Historic landfill site

WFD - Transitional waterbodies

Source Protection ZonesZone I - Inner protection zone

Zone II - Outer protection zone

Zone III - Total catchment

Land TakePermanent


East T ilburyW est T ilburyChadwell

Wood

Black shotsNature Area

TerrelsHeath

Muck ingHeath

R ainbowS haw

LinfordPit

Low S treet Pit

Goshems FarmTilbury Marshes

BishopBonnersPalace

NorthOckendon

T ilburyPower S tation

Poplars Farm

Moat Bridge andGatehouse at S outhOck endon Hall

Coalhouse Fort battery and artillery defences

Buck land

W hitecrofts Farm

Heath Place

Murrells Cottages

Lytag Brownfield

T hatched Cottage

1&2 Grays Corner Cottages

GRAVESEND


Marshes

Shorneand Ashenbank

Woods


ThamesEstuary

T hong

ClaylaneWood

Canal and Grazing Marsh Higham

FilboroughFarmhouseGranary at LittleFilborough Farm

Church of S t Mary

East CourtFarmhouse

W hite HorseCottage

Kent DownsCobham Hall

S outhern LinkAlternatives cut line

W esternS outhern Link

EasternS outhernLink

ShorneS horne V illage

Cobham Woods

Great Crabbles Wood

Court W oodS horne Pasture

StarmoreWood Peartree

Wood

GreatWood

ThongShorne

Ridgeway

Little S t Katherine's

S t Katherine's HouseChapel of S t Katherine

Pipes Place

W ell CottageBushylees

Chestnut Green

Bulphan

Former Gateway at Groves Barns

Church of S t Nicholas

THURROCK

Orsett House

Linford

Marshall’s Cottages

Church of S t Mary, Chadwell

Chadwell St Mary

Church of S t J ames

EastTilbury

TILBURY

T ilbury Fort

Cliffe Fort

S hornemead Fort

Chalk

S outhern V alley Golf Course

Cascades Leisure Centre

Riverview Park

S horne W oods Country Park

Church of S t Mary Magdelene

Church of S t Peter and S t Paul

Lower Shorne

A13

A1089

A2

A289

M25

Crop markcomplex,Orsett

S econd W orld W aranti-aircraft batteryat Bowaters Farm

Gatehouse andmoat of S outh

Ock enden Old Hall

Earthwork snear church,W est T ilbury

Deneholes in

Hangman's W ood

R oman barrow 260mnorth east of S outhOck endon Hall

S pringfield styleenclosure and

Iron Age enclosuressouth of Hill House,Bak er S treet.

Causewayed enclosureand Anglo-S axon cemetery500m ENE of Heath Place

WestTilbury

GRAYS

OrsettSouth

Ockendon

MuckingFlats andMarshes


Major Planned DevelopmentDevelopment Boundary

Ecological ConstraintsFunctional Habitat (International value)R amsar (International value)S pecial Protection Area(International value)Ancient W oodland(National value)S ite of S pecial S cientific Interest (National value)R ecommended MarineConservation Z one (National value)Local Nature R eserve (Local value)Local W ildlife S ite (Local value)

Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGrade I Listed Building(National value)Grade II* Listed Building(National value)Grade II Listed Building(R egional value)S cheduled Monument(National value)R egistered Park s and Garden(National value)Conservation Area(National - Local value)

Land TakeNorthern Permanent Landtak eS ub-soil Landtak eES L Permanent Landtak eW S L Permanent Landtak e


Area of Outstanding NaturalBeauty (National value)

¯

R oute 3 Bored Tunnel Land Tak e

High Level Constraints

08/08/161:55,000L.HULME

Copyright

Path: C:\Users\lha76846\OneDrive - ARCADIS\LTC\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001.mxd

S .R IMELLA.S AUNDER S

HHJ -EGN-CD3Z Z Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0001

© English Heritage 2016. © Natural England 2016. Contains Ordnance S urvey data © Crowncopyright and database rights 2016Ordnance S urvey 100030649

R evisionS tatus

S cale

Drawn ByCheck ed ByApproved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | OriginatorOriginal S ize A3

| | |

Project LOW ER THAMESCR OS S ING

Drawing T itle

Project No.

Date -

Client

R ev S tatus R ev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck 'd Apprv'd


S windon, S N4 0Q DTel. +44(0)1793 812479 HA540039ILLUSTRATIVE

DESIGNT he design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the scheme development.

S 5P01 18/01/16 S AR IS S UE LH S R AS

S 5 P02

HHJ

0 1 2Kilometres

S 5P02 08/08/16Post Consultation S AR Issue LH S R AS

Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take

Water Constraints

08/08/161:55,000

L.HULME

Copyright

Pa

th:

K:\

UA

pro

jects

\UA

00

70

80

-Lo

we

r T

ha

me

s C

rossin

g\D

-Ca

lcs\G

IS\E

nvir

on

me

nta

l P

lan

nin

g\m

xd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-CD

3Z

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

02

.mxd

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS

HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002

© Environment Agency copyright 2016.

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown

copyright and database rights 2016

Ordnance Survey 100030649

RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator




Project No.

Date -

Client



Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479




scheme development.


S5P02

HHJ

River Mardyke

West TilburyMarshes

East TilburyMarshes

ShorneMarshes

South Thames Estuary and

Marshes SSSI

FilboroughMarshes

WesternSouthern Link

EasternSouthernLink

West TilburyFlood Storage Area

Recommended MarineConservation Zone (rMCZ)

Southern LinkAlternatives cut line

Thames andMedway Canal

River Thames


Flood defence

WFD river waterbodiescycle2 (Draft)

Area benefitting fromflood defences







Land TakeNorthern Permanent Land take

Sub-soil Land take

ESL Permanent Land take

WSL Permanent Land take

0 1 2Kilometres

¯


Pa

th:

K:\

UA

pro

jects

\UA

00

70

80

-Lo

we

r T

ha

me

s C

rossin

g\D

-Ca

lcs\G

IS\E

nvir

on

me

nta

l P

lan

nin

g\m

xd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-CD

4Z

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

01

.mxd


High Level Constraints

08/08/161:65,000

L.HULME

Copyright

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS


© English Heritage 2016.

© Natural England 2016.




RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator




Project No.

Date -

Client



Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479




scheme development.


S5P02

HHJ

Thong

East TilburyWest Tilbury

ClaylaneWood

Mucking

Heath

Rainbow

Shaw

Linford

Pit

Low Street

Pit

Goshems Farm

Canal and Grazing

Marsh Higham

Tilbury

Power Station

Filborough

Farmhouse

Granary at Little

Filborough Farm

Coalhouse Fort

battery and artillery

defences

Church of

St Mary

East Court

Farmhouse

White Horse

Cottage

Buckland

Kent DownsCobham Hall

Lytag Brownfield

Thorndon Park

Old Thorndon

Hall and gardens

Thorndon Park

Former parish church

and churchyard of St Nicholas

WestHorndon

on the Hill

ThorndonPark

Codham

Hall Wood

Hobbs Hole

Warley

Hall Wood

Thorndon Country

Park South

Straight Path Shaw

Round Shaw

Thick/Hollow

Bottom Shaws

Eastlands Spring

Orsett

Camp Quarry

Buckingham

Hill

Linford

Wood

All Saints Churchyard

and Keepers Cottage

Meadow

Ongar

Hall

Timber Framed Barn

at Ongar Hall

Barn to North of

Farmhouse

Farmhouse

Saffron Garden

Walls at

Saffron Garden

Linstead Farm

Cottages

Cholleys

Farmhouse

Bulphan WWII

bombing decoy

East

Horndon

Hall

Thong

Chalk

EastTilbury

Linford

Southfields

SHORNE

Southern Link

Alternatives cut line

WesternSouthern Link

EasternSouthern

Link

The

Kiln Hotel

Hulmers

Church of

St Peter

Little

Warley Hall

Church of

All Saints

Dunton

Hills Farm

Dunton Hills Family

Golf Centre

Dunton Hall

Old Plough House

Ongar Hall

Farm

THURROCK

Marshall's

Cottage

Church of

St James

TILBURY

Southern Valley

Golf Course

Cascades

Leisure Centre

Shorne

Village

Little

St Katherine's

Chestnut Green,

Shorne

Shorne Woods

Country Park

GRAVESHAM

Church of

St Mary Magdalene

Cliffe

Church of

St Peter and St Paul

Wyfields

Horndon

Bulphan

Shorne Ridgeway

Second World War

anti-aircraft battery

at Bowaters Farm

Earthworks

near church,

West Tilbury

GRAVESEND

WestTilbury

Shorneand Ashenbank

Woods


Marshes

MuckingFlats andMarshes



ThamesEstuary

A13

A1089

A2 A289

Strood

A1014

STANFORD-LE-HOPE

M25

0 1 2Kilometres

¯

Major Planned DevelopmentDevelopment Boundary

Ecological ConstraintsFunctional Habitat (International value)

Ramsar (International value)

Special Protection Area


Ancient Woodland

(National value)

Site of Special Scientific

Interest (National value)

Recommended Marine

Conservation Zone (National value)

Local Nature Reserve (Local value)

Local Wildlife Site (Local value)

Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGrade I Listed Building

(National value)

Grade II* Listed Building

(National value)

Grade II Listed Building

(Regional value)

Scheduled Monument

(National value)

Registered Parks and Garden

(National value)

Conservation Area

(National - Local value)

Land TakeNorthern Permanent Landtake

Sub-soil Landtake

ESL Permanent Landtake

WSL Permanent Landtake






Water Constraints

08/08/161:60,000

L.HULME

Copyright

Pa

th:

K:\

UA

pro

jects

\UA

00

70

80

-Lo

we

r T

ha

me

s C

rossin

g\D

-Ca

lcs\G

IS\E

nvir

on

me

nta

l P

lan

nin

g\m

xd

\SA

R\H

A5

40

03

9-H

HJ-E

GN

-CD

4Z

ZZ

ZZ

EG

-MP

-EN

-00

02

.mxd

S.RIMELL

A.SAUNDERS


© Environment Agency copyright 2016.




RevisionStatus

Scale

Drawn By

Checked By

Approved By

Drawing Number

PINHA | Originator




Project No.

Date -

Client



Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479




scheme development.


S5P02

HHJ

River Mardyke

West Tilbury

Marshes

East Tilbury

Marshes

Shorne

Marshes

South Thames

Estuary andMarshes SSSI

Filborough

Marshes

Southern LinkAlternatives cut

line

WesternSouthern

Link

EasternSouthern

Link

Critical Drainage

Area CDA_011

Critical Drainage

Area CDA_010a

Critical Drainage

Area CDA_010B

West Tilbury

Flood Storage Area

Recommended Marine

Conservation Zone (rMCZ)

Thames and

Medway Canal

River Thames


Flood defence





Source Protection Zones

Zone I - Inner protection zone



Land TakeWSL Permanent Landtake


0 1 2Kilometres

¯


Flood defence





Area benefitting from flood defences




Zone of Special Interest

Land TakeNorthern Permanent Landtake

Sub-soil Landtake


WSL Permanent Landtake


POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

ii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Appendix 6.2 - Engagement with Environmental Bodies

Engagement with Environmental Bodies

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

22/01/2015 Workshop

Update on project and options development, share draft approach to environmental appraisal and reporting, seek feedback on key environmental issues and opportunities.

Environment Agency (EA), Natural England, Marine Management Organisation (MMO), Historic England and Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).

Attendees provided feedback on approach and data sources for the purposes of the appraisal.

Agreed future lines of communication with the attendees and confirmed key points of contact.

04/03/2015 Bilateral Meeting

To share the methodology and updated environmental constraints mapping

Historic England Provided details about sensitivity of the Scheduled Monuments along the River Thames.

Recommended engaging with the county archaeologists (Kent and Essex) and Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service to present the scheme details to them and to obtain baseline data.

Potential for significant archaeological remains across study area based on crop mark information. This will require thorough assessment and mitigation at the next development phase of the project.

Provided information about a number of the designated assets and the linkages between them e.g. East and West Tilbury.


To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential option effects

Essex County Council Archaeology

Advised review of the Historic Environment Record and collation of the Historic Environment Characterisation Data.

Provided cropmark data during the meeting and highlighted the high potential for there to be non-designated archaeological remains that could be affected.



Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service

Advised that information would be provided on potential heritage constraints.

Highlighted that archaeological assets were previously identified at a construction compound for the M25 works.


iii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED




Kent Downs AONB Highlighted the importance of considering the Kent Downs AONB Management Plan.

Kent Downs AONB is keen to examine any potential opportunities from LTC to enhance the AONB.

Highlighted the need for the costs associated with mitigation to be incorporated into scheme costs and this should inform the decision-making process.

Consideration should be given to the impact of Options at A and C on the A2 at Canterbury and on the M20 at Roundhill.

11/05/2015 Bilateral Meeting To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential option effects

Kent County Council – Archaeology

Kent CC highlighted the sensitivity of the Scheduled Monuments along the River Thames to setting impacts; they are an integral part of the military landscape.

Advised review of the Historic Environment Record and collation of the Historic Environment Characterisation Data.



Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB)

RSPB welcomed the approach and also the completion of a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Report for the options.

RSPB advised that a GIS layer of their reserves can be presented on the constraints maps.


iv POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED


17/06/2015 Workshop

To seek feedback on the draft shortlist and the rejected options, to explore and seek feedback on the detailed appraisal of the short list, to provide further details on the crossing types

Environment Agency, Natural England, MMO and Historic England.

Natural England requested a more detailed bilateral meeting to discuss HRA issues further – highlighted concerns and risks associated with an immersed tunnel and bridge options at Location C and the impact on European Sites.

EA highlighted the need to consider potential contamination risks when considering the options, for example, locations of casting basins for an immersed tunnel.

Contact DP World to discuss the ecological data that they hold as this may inform the next development stage of the project.

EA highlighted that a new Thames Barrier is a major future development that could have implications for selection of the proposed solution.

EA highlighted works undertaken as part of the TE2100 Plan and issues associated with HRA and habitat creation/compensation. Recommended that a further meeting be held to discuss the likely potential to recreate habitat in the event of it being affected by the Scheme (relating to loss of habitat associated with European Sites).


v POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED



To seek detailed feedback on elements of the water environment appraisal, to discuss contaminated land constraints and to understand the Environment Agency (EA) future plans with regards to TE2100

Environment Agency There is a Flood Storage Area located between Tilbury and Chadwell St Mary that could be affected by Route 2. This is potentially a significant issue for this option as there would be a need to create compensatory storage in the event of this area being affected.

Groundwater conditions are very complex and constantly changing, the need for early monitoring data to inform the design of the proposed solution should be considered.

There are limited opportunities to create compensatory habitat within the LTC area owing to coastal squeeze and managed realignments.

Engage with the London Gateway Partnership to discuss compensatory land and how they have approached the issue.

Highlighted the need for the scheme to also consider opportunities e.g. road embankments could provide a flood defence function that may support proposals in TE2100, there is potential for enhancement measures at Mardyke.

Must consider presence of historic landfills as there may be asbestos present and there are associated high costs associated with disposal.

Should a tunnel at location A be progressed it will be important to consider the impacts of any dewatering on Dartford Marshes. Dewatering at location C could have a significant impact on habitats.


vi POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED



To seek feedback on the proposed approach to the HRA of the short list

Natural England Advised that a Part One Appropriate Assessment Report should be completed as there is a likelihood of significant effects as a result of the options.

Approach to the Part One Appropriate Assessment was discussed including the fact that there would be a lot of uncertainty at this stage and that a traffic light system should be considered in the reporting.

Highlighted the need for the assessment of a Ramsar site to cover more than just the bird interest.

Natural England stated that the wider project team must be made aware of the risks associated with options and the potential effects on European Sites. Project costings also need to consider ‘whole life costs’ and compensation requirements (securing management of compensatory habitat in perpetuity). Natural England stated that assessment of alternatives is a key consideration and that discounting of an option with a higher cost but with a lesser impact on a European Site would not be a reason to discount an option.

Natural England advised that the Part One Appropriate Assessment should consider other schemes and the potential for cumulative effects.


vii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED



To discuss the approach to identifying mitigation/ compensation land.

Natural England and the Environment Agency

Highlighted that it would be difficult to create fresh water habitat and tidal habitats and that there would be long lead in times associated with this and the time it would take for the habitat to be viewed as functional.

For each option where there may be a loss of habitat within a European Site it will be necessary to quantify the area affected (e.g. construction, operation and sterilisation due to other effects) before addressing the issues of availability and re-create ability.

EA/Natural England advised that the scheme should aim to work within the bounds of presumption to compensate ahead of any impact on a Natura 2000 site (or its qualifying species) at a minimum ratio of 1:1. However, the ratio of compensatory habitat to be provided needs to be considered on a case by case basis. The challenge will be identifying a suitable ratio of compensatory habitat related to the time taken before the compensatory habitat becomes ‘functional’ and the stability of that habitat once it has become established (i.e. loss of intertidal habitat over time as saltmarsh develops). There is also a risk that compensatory habitat does not work, i.e. freshwater habitat creation much more difficult to achieve than intertidal habitats.

There are no ‘fixed’ timescales for assessing when the condition of the compensatory habitat would be of comparable (or higher) value to that of the habitat which has been lost. Instead, it would be compared to the wider Natura 2000 network of adjacent habitats. Ultimately, the requirement would be for the compensatory habitat to form part of the surrounding Natura 2000 network of sites.

All meeting attendees highlighted that the HRA process cannot be ‘short-cut’ and that each stage must be followed and that consideration of the least damaging alternative will be essential.

Some potential areas for compensatory habitat were discussed within the LTC area.


viii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED



To provide an update on the proposed HRA methodology

RSPB RSPB advised the inclusion of Holehaven Creek pSPA (potential Special Protection Area) and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within the HRA.

Advised that hydrology impacts on wetland habitats should be considered.

RSPB will provide information received from Rainham Marshes regarding bird movements and effects from the existing Dartford Crossing.

Recommended looking at Kent Wildlife Trust’s biodiversity area mapping which identified existing ecological networks.


To provide an update on the environmental appraisal and crossings and to discuss opportunities and risks.

Environment Agency Advised that the Water Framework Directive (WFD) assessment guidance may be available in January 2016 and it would be advisable to use the new guidance at the next development phase of the project.

The Tilbury Flood Storage Area and the potential constraints for Route 2 was highlighted. A route through the Flood Storage Area is feasible so long as mitigation is put in place but cautioned it may be difficult to find a feasible option because of lack of capacity.

Mardyke is an important area for water vole population. Opportunities for ecological enhancement should be considered.

WFD salt marsh survey is likely to be undertaken in 2016 and the results of this survey may be useful for the next development stage of the project.


To discuss the draft Part 1 Appropriate Assessment

Natural England Natural England highlighted the importance of the ditch network in the Ramsar site and its sensitive hydrology.

Natural England reiterated the points raised in previous meetings about HRA and the need for the results of this to inform the selection of the proposed solution.


ix POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED



To provide a project update and initial results of the appraisal

Natural England, MMO and Historic England.

Further meeting during the consultation would be beneficial with the Statutory Environmental Bodies (SEBs) to enable discussion of the appraisal results.

Natural England raised concern about the loss of wildlife sites and severance of ancient woodland for the ESL although they are pleased regarding the selection of a bored tunnel.

Natural England stated that mitigation such as a green bridge for the ESL is potentially something that Highways England could consider.

Historic England stated that whilst there may be some heritage concerns it will be easier for them to understand the impacts once more detail of the road alignment is made available and in particular how close the road will be to heritage assets. It was acknowledged that there is a greater concentration of heritage assets around the ESL compared to the WSL.


To provide a project update

Kent Downs AONB The AONB requested the opportunity to be involved in the methodology for a future Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for the proposed solution.

The AONB welcomed the discounting of certain options that would have had a greater impact on the AONB.


x POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Meetings Post Launch of the 2016 Consultation


08/02/2016 Consultation Meeting

To provide a project update and to outline the materials that were available during the consultation process.

Natural England

Historic England

Environment Agency

Meeting was primarily to advise on information available during consultation rather than to discuss scheme details.

Clarification was provided by the LTC team about where specific scheme information could be obtained from the consultation documents.


To provide a project update

RSPB Meeting was primarily to advise on information available during consultation rather than to discuss scheme details.

Various data sources were identified that would provide useful information to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the preferred route.

21/07/2016 SEB Meeting

To discuss the main comments raised by the consultees in response to the consultation

Natural England

Historic England

Environment Agency

Environment Agency highlighted the importance of ensuring that issues associated with landfills potentially crossed by options are taken into account early enough in the design process.

Historic England stated that they would like to be engaged in setting the scope of the cultural heritage assessment and that discussions will be required regarding mitigation options particularly where features are directly affect (Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments).

Natural England stated that they would provide advice to inform the development of ecological survey methodologies for the future EIA.

All parties acknowledged that the consultation process to date had been very helpful.


To provide a project update and to discuss their response to the consultation

Kent Downs AONB AONB provided advice regarding their draft position statement on setting and advised that setting is very important and must be considered as part of the future Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment.

AONB stated that they would like to be involved in establishing the scope of the LVIA for the preferred route.

AONB commented that in terms of mitigation the AONB would expect exceptional effort particularly with regards to impacts as a result of the Eastern Southern Link. They highlighted the importance of learning from best practice in other countries. The AONB’s Management Plan is very clear about mitigation and compensation.


xi POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED



To provide details of the project and to discuss their response to the consultation

Kent Wildlife Trust Noted that ecological mitigation may be significant and should be considered as part of overall project costs. Recommended that LTC establish environmental stakeholder groups for Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) so that any conflict of interest and joint initiatives can be considered more easily. One for Essex and one for Kent. May wish to include Natural England as over-arching authority for natural environment. North Kent Environmental Planning Group cited as effective example, which has developed a plan to reduce recreational impacts on Natura 2000 sites in Kent; care to be taken to avoid impacts (from LTC) on delivery of this plan.

All Kent WLT biological records held by the Kent and Medway Biological Records Centre. Data requests can also be made via Buglife.

11/08/2016 Bilateral meeting


The Woodland Trust Advised of NPPF, NPS and current Standing Advice from Forestry Commission and Natural England with regard to irreplaceable nature of ancient woodland. Confirmed that loss of ancient woodland remains a significant concern. Currently 633 cases where ancient woodland under threat in UK from development. Noted that cannot mitigate loss, but compensation (as final resort) should be significant and ideally consist of reinstatement of Planted Ancient Woodland Sites or native tree planting to link remaining remnants of ancient woodland to improve ecological function. Concern that Route 2 and, particularly, Route 4 affect ancient woodland, whilst Route 3 north of river more favourable, but should consider potential for impact on veteran/ ancient trees.

11/08/2016 Bilateral meeting


Buglife Advised the Thames Terrace Grasslands in Essex support 2 of the top 5 invertebrate sites in the UK. This area of Essex has highest levels of invertebrate diversity in England. This network of important invertebrates sites should be considered as a whole, not on individual site basis.



Appendix 6.3 - Air Quality Results

PREDICTED ANNUAL MEAN NO2 CONCENTRATIONS AT SELECTED RECEPTORS WITHIN 200 METRES OF AFFECTED ROAD NETWORK

Receptor ID

Do Minimum (µg/m³) [1]

Route 1 (µg/m³)[1]

Route 1 Change µg/m³)

Route 3 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 3 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 3 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route3 ESL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 ESL

Change (µg/m³)

Approximate Number of Potentially Influenced

Receptors [2]

R1 34.3 39.5 5.2 34.4 0.1 34.5 0.2 34.5 0.2 34.5 0.2 <10

R2 27.5 32.5 5.0 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 <50

R3 40.0 39.5 -0.5 40.0 0.0 40.1 0.1 40.1 0.1 40.1 0.1 <50

R4 50.5 47.7 -2.8 46.6 -3.9 46.7 -3.8 46.7 -3.8 46.8 -3.7 <10

R5 41.4 42.6 1.2 40.7 -0.7 40.7 -0.7 40.8 -0.6 40.8 -0.6 <50

R6 34.8 36.8 2.0 34.3 -0.5 34.3 -0.5 34.4 -0.4 34.4 -0.4 <50

R7 33.5 35.3 1.8 32.9 -0.6 32.9 -0.6 33.0 -0.5 33.0 -0.5 <50

R8 47.7 51.2 3.5 47.4 -0.3 47.5 -0.2 47.6 -0.1 47.6 -0.1 <50

R9 47.9 51.9 4.0 44.1 -3.8 44.1 -3.8 44.2 -3.7 44.2 -3.7 <50

R10 42.1 45.1 3.0 39.1 -3.0 39.2 -2.9 39.2 -2.9 39.3 -2.8 <50

R11 41.7 44.4 2.7 37.2 -4.5 37.2 -4.5 37.3 -4.4 37.3 -4.4 <100

R12 52.0 55.6 3.6 45.0 -7.0 45.0 -7.0 45.2 -6.8 45.2 -6.8 <50

R13 41.9 44.0 2.1 39.4 -2.5 39.4 -2.5 39.5 -2.4 39.5 -2.4 <50

R14 34.7 36.6 1.9 33.8 -0.9 33.8 -0.9 33.9 -0.8 33.9 -0.8 <50

R15 35.2 37.3 2.1 34.6 -0.6 34.6 -0.6 34.7 -0.5 34.7 -0.5 <50

R16 20.2 20.2 0.0 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 <10

R17 21.7 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 <50

R18 23.5 23.5 0.0 23.3 -0.2 23.4 -0.1 23.3 -0.2 23.4 -0.1 <50

R19 20.1 20.2 0.1 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 <50

R20 25.8 26.1 0.3 25.3 -0.5 25.3 -0.5 25.4 -0.4 25.3 -0.5 <10

R21 23.6 23.5 -0.1 23.0 -0.6 23.7 0.1 23.0 -0.6 23.7 0.1 <100


ii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Receptor ID




Route 3 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 3 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 3 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route3 ESL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 ESL

Change (µg/m³)


Receptors [2]

R22 27.5 27.6 0.1 26.9 -0.6 27 -0.5 26.9 -0.6 27.0 -0.5 <50

R23 21.8 21.8 0.0 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 <50

R24 26.9 26.7 -0.2 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 <10

R25 23.8 23.8 0.0 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 <50

R26 33.1 33.1 0.0 33.1 0.0 33.1 0.0 33.0 -0.1 33.0 -0.1 <100

R27 37.3 37.0 -0.3 37.2 -0.1 37.2 -0.1 37.1 -0.2 37.1 -0.2 <100

R28 38.1 37.5 -0.6 37.6 -0.5 37.7 -0.4 37.5 -0.6 37.6 -0.5 <100

R29 24.5 25.0 0.5 24.8 0.3 24.9 0.4 25.0 0.5 25.0 0.5 <50

R30 17.8 18.3 0.5 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 <10

R31 21.5 21.7 0.2 20.9 -0.6 20.9 -0.6 21.1 -0.4 21.1 -0.4 <50

R32 25.4 25.8 0.4 24.2 -1.2 24.2 -1.2 24.6 -0.8 24.6 -0.8 <10

R33 30.2 30.8 0.6 34.8 4.6 34.9 4.7 28.9 -1.3 28.9 -1.3 <10

R34 24.7 24.8 0.1 25.9 1.2 25.9 1.2 24.0 -0.7 24.0 -0.7 <10

R35 17.4 17.4 0.0 17.1 -0.3 17.1 -0.3 18.5 1.1 18.6 1.2 <10

R36 22.3 22.4 0.1 23.0 0.7 22.4 0.1 23.0 0.7 22.5 0.2 <100

R37 20.5 20.6 0.1 20.1 -0.4 20.1 -0.4 20.4 -0.1 20.5 0.0 <10

R38 20.9 20.9 0.0 20.6 -0.3 20.6 -0.3 21.5 0.6 21.6 0.7 <50

R39 17.1 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 <100

R40 12.4 12.4 0.0 11.9 -0.5 13.8 1.4 11.9 -0.5 13.7 1.3 <50

R41 36.9 40.3 3.4 36.0 -0.9 36.0 -0.9 36.1 -0.8 36.1 -0.8 <50

R42 27.3 27.6 0.3 26.9 -0.4 26.9 -0.4 27.0 -0.3 27.0 -0.3 <10

R43 22.2 22.3 0.1 22.0 -0.2 22 -0.2 22.0 -0.2 22.0 -0.2 <50

R44 12.1 12.1 0.0 13.7 1.6 13.3 1.2 13.6 1.5 13.2 1.1 <10

R45 24.9 25.5 0.6 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 <10

R46 28.4 28.5 0.1 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 <50


iii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Receptor ID




Route 3 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 3 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 3 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route3 ESL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 ESL

Change (µg/m³)


Receptors [2]

R47 28.5 28.5 0.0 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 <50

R48 22.9 22.8 -0.1 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 <10

R49 31.4 33.0 1.6 30.5 -0.9 30.5 -0.9 30.7 -0.7 30.6 -0.8 <10

R50 16.8 16.9 0.1 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 <10

R51 19.5 19.5 0.0 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 <50

R52 20.7 20.5 -0.2 20.7 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.8 0.1 <100

R53 35.4 38.9 3.5 35.6 0.2 35.5 0.1 35.7 0.3 35.6 0.2 <10

R54 24.1 24.4 0.3 24.3 0.2 24.2 0.1 24.3 0.2 24.2 0.1 <10

R55 21.4 21.8 0.4 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 <10

R56 19.0 19.2 0.2 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 <10

R57 19.4 19.6 0.2 19.6 0.2 19.6 0.2 19.7 0.3 19.6 0.2 <10

R58 18.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 <10

R59 19.1 19.0 -0.1 18.9 -0.2 18.8 -0.3 18.9 -0.2 18.8 -0.3 <50

R60 14.9 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 <10

R61 17.6 17.8 0.2 17.4 -0.2 17.3 -0.3 17.4 -0.2 17.4 -0.2 <10

R62 23.0 23.1 0.1 22.8 -0.2 22.6 -0.4 22.9 -0.1 22.6 -0.4 <100

R63 19.6 19.9 0.3 19.3 -0.3 19.2 -0.4 19.3 -0.3 19.2 -0.4 <10

R64 15.4 15.6 0.2 15.1 -0.3 15.0 -0.4 15.2 -0.2 15.1 -0.3 <10

R65 13.0 13.2 0.2 12.9 -0.1 12.8 -0.2 12.9 -0.1 12.9 -0.1 <10

R66 16.0 16.0 0.0 15.9 -0.1 15.9 -0.1 16.0 0.0 15.9 -0.1 <50

R67 22.6 22.7 0.1 22.9 0.3 21.8 -0.8 22.2 -0.4 21.9 -0.7 <100

R68 25.0 25.1 0.1 26.8 1.8 35.1 10.1 26.7 1.7 34.9 9.9 <50

R69 12.2 12.2 0.0 12.4 0.2 12.5 0.3 12.4 0.2 12.5 0.3 <50

R70 22.2 22.2 0.0 23.2 1.0 23.6 1.4 23.2 1.0 23.6 1.4 <50

R71 22.9 22.9 0.0 25.1 2.2 25.5 2.6 25.0 2.1 25.5 2.6 <50


iv POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Receptor ID




Route 3 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 3 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 3 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route3 ESL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 ESL

Change (µg/m³)


Receptors [2]

R72 18.5 18.5 0.0 18.7 0.2 18.8 0.3 18.7 0.2 18.8 0.3 <10

R73 15.8 15.8 0.0 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 <100

R74 21.8 21.9 0.1 22.2 0.4 22.2 0.4 21.3 -0.5 21.3 -0.5 <50

R75 22.9 23.0 0.1 25.2 2.3 25.2 2.3 23.1 0.2 23.1 0.2 <10

R76 29.9 30.3 0.4 32.6 2.7 32.7 2.8 32.7 2.8 32.8 2.9 <10

R77 21.1 21.2 0.1 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 <10

R78 18.7 18.8 0.1 18.4 -0.3 18.3 -0.4 18.4 -0.3 18.3 -0.4 <50

R79 25.4 25.6 0.2 25.1 -0.3 25 -0.4 25.1 -0.3 25.1 -0.3 <100

R80 22.1 22.2 0.1 22.2 0.1 23.3 1.2 22.2 0.1 23.3 1.2 <10

R81 25.5 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 <10

R82 19.6 19.6 0.0 20.0 0.4 20 0.4 19.7 0.1 19.7 0.1 <50

R83 12.4 12.4 0.0 14.1 1.7 12.1 -0.3 14.0 1.6 12.1 -0.3 <10

R84 20.2 20.2 0.0 19.0 -1.2 19.0 -1.2 19.2 -1.0 19.2 -1.0 <10

R85 19.2 19.1 -0.1 18.6 -0.6 18.6 -0.6 20.1 0.9 20.2 1.0 <10

R86 16.7 16.6 -0.1 16.9 0.2 16.9 0.2 16.4 -0.3 16.4 -0.3 <50

R87 18.4 18.5 0.1 18.7 0.3 18.7 0.3 18.6 0.2 18.6 0.2 <10

R88 17.5 17.5 0.0 17.4 -0.1 17.4 -0.1 17.8 0.3 17.8 0.3 <50

R89 12.5 12.5 0.0 12.5 0.0 14.5 2.0 12.5 0.0 14.3 1.8 <50

R93 15.7 15.7 0.0 16.1 0.4 17.7 2.0 16.1 0.4 17.6 1.9 <10

R94 15.6 15.7 0.1 15.8 0.2 15.8 0.2 15.6 0.0 15.6 0.0 <10

R95 13.7 13.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 14.6 0.9 14.7 1.0 <10

R100 14.5 14.5 0.0 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 <10

R101 14.9 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 <100

R102 13.9 13.9 0.0 13.9 0.0 13.9 0.0 13.8 -0.1 13.8 -0.1 <10

R103 31.3 31.6 0.3 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 <100


v POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Receptor ID




Route 3 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 3 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 3 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route3 ESL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 WSL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 WSL

Change (µg/m³)

Route 4 ESL

(µg/m³)[1]

Route 4 ESL

Change (µg/m³)


Receptors [2]

R104 29.1 29.2 0.1 28.4 -0.7 28.4 -0.7 28.7 -0.4 28.8 -0.3 <100

R105 18.3 18.3 0.0 18.4 0.1 18.4 0.1 18.4 0.1 18.3 0.0 <100

R106 20.6 20.7 0.1 21.4 0.8 21.7 1.1 21.4 0.8 21.6 1.0 <100

R107 14.1 14.1 0.0 13.0 -1.1 15.1 1.0 13.0 -1.1 15.0 0.9 <50

R108 11.8 11.8 0.0 11.7 -0.1 11.8 0.0 11.7 -0.1 11.8 0.0 <50

R109 14.1 14.1 0.0 15.2 1.1 14.9 0.8 15.1 1.0 14.8 0.7 <50

[1] LTT=Long Term Trend. Predicted NO2 concentrations were adjusted using a Gap Factor based on the long term adjustment factor calculated by Highways England’s Interim Alternative Long Term Gap Analysis Calculator v1.1. All values reflect predicted concentrations for the future year 2025.

[2] Value reflects an approximated number of receptors which occur in the vicinity (and thereby may experience a similar effect of the scheme) as the modelled receptor.

If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information,please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.

© Crown copyright 2017.You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence: visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email [email protected].

This document is also available on our website at www.gov.uk/highways

If you have any enquiries about this publication email [email protected] or call 0300 123 5000*. Please quote the Highways England publications code PR167/15

Highways England creative job number S160683

Report No HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012

post-Consultation SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (Volume 6 ... · Blackwater Estuary (Mid-Essex Coast...

Documents

Transcript of post-Consultation SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (Volume 6 ... · Blackwater Estuary (Mid-Essex Coast...