Plate With Hole

15
Plane Frame 1 Step 00 2-D Linear Static Analysis Model - 1/4 symmetric Model - Unit: N, mm - Isotropic Elastic Material - Membrane Loads and Boundary Conditions - Edge Pressure - Constraint (Symmetric) Results Verification - Displacement/Deformation - Probe Result Plate with a Hole ¼ Model Summary Summary

description

DFG

Transcript of Plate With Hole

Page 1: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 1

Step

00

2-D Linear Static Analysis

Model

- 1/4 symmetric Model

- Unit: N, mm

- Isotropic Elastic Material

- Membrane

Loads and Boundary

Conditions

- Edge Pressure

- Constraint (Symmetric)

Results Verification

-

Displacement/Deformation

- Probe Result

Plate with a Hole

¼

Model

Summary

Summary

Page 2: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 2

Step

00 Problem

Page 3: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 3

Step

This problem has 2 planes of symmetry, so we will cut the model in 2 in order

to:

-Reduce the size of the problem

-Reduce model time

-Introduce a blocking of movement of this plate which is only submitted to

pressure load

00 Problem reduction due to symmetry

Page 4: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 17

Step

17

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Analysis of results

Page 5: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 18

Step

18

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Comparison for different mesh sizes and types

Page 6: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 19

Step

19

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

We will use 2 types of mesh:

-Linear Triangle mesh (TRI3) has 3 nodes/element

-Quadratic Triangle mesh has 6 nodes/element

Linear and quadratic elements

Page 7: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 20

Step

20

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Results for linear triangle elements

Page 8: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 21

Step

21

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Results for quadratic triangle elements

Page 9: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 22

Step

22

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Comparison between triangle elements

Page 10: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 23

Step

23

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Comparison between quad elements

Page 11: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 24

Step

24

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Results for linear triangle elements

Page 12: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 25

Step

25

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Results for quadratic triangle elements

Page 13: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 26

Step

26

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Comparison between triangle elements

Page 14: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 27

Step

27

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Meshing adapted to the geometry

To get better accuracy and be efficient (less number of elements), use adapted mesh

Page 15: Plate With Hole

Plane Frame 28

Step

28

Total Solutions for True Analysis-driven Design

Conclusion

-Always prefer linear quad elements to linear triangle elements

-To get superior accuracy for ordinary displacement analysis, use 2nd order

triangle elements

-For stress analysis, linear elements converge more slowly than for simple

displacement analysis

-> When performing stress analysis, always use 2nd order elements