Plasma Materials Interactions - Stanford...
Transcript of Plasma Materials Interactions - Stanford...
Plasma Materials Interactions
The Dirty Part of Plasma Physics
May 2, 2006
M. UlricksonPresented at GCEP Fusion Workshop
Princeton, NJ
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company,for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration
under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
MAU 2 5/20/2003
Introduction
• The interaction between fusion plasmas and cold materials is complex
• Design of Plasma Facing Components (PFCs) involves science from a diverse set of skills
• Successful PFCs must be robust and forgiving and operate very near the limit of catastrophic failure
MAU 3 5/20/2003
Introduction
• My topics will include:– Plasma edge characteristics– Plasma materials interactions– Materials selection for PFCs– Off-Normal events – Research opportunities (red titles)
MAU 4 5/20/2003
ITER PFCs
MAU 5 5/20/2003
Complex Forces Act in the Scrape-Off Layer
• Radial Electric fields• Gradients of magnetic
fields• Neutral particle influx from
the PFCs• Impurity generation at the
PFCs• The resulting plasma flows
create the plasma conditions in the divertor and at the first wall
MAU 6 5/20/2003
Example of Plasma Parameters at Divertor
MAU 7 5/20/2003
Plasma Core to SOL and Divertor Coupling
• The divertor needs to be at high density and have some impurities to enter the detached regime where heat loads are reduced.
• Complete detachment leads to flow stagnation and may not be compatible with He pumping.
• But the SOL density needs to be controlled for good core confinement and low wall erosion.
• Long pulses and high power also lead to new regimes for plasma wall interactions and erosion.
• If SOL pumping is extremely high, flat density profiles and high temperature plasma edge may be realized
MAU 8 5/20/2003
Fusion Plasma Materials Interactions
• The core plasma must be kept clean of impurities and He ash
• The plasma facing component surface sees high density and temperature plasma
• Key issues are hydrogen trapping, erosion, and thermal fatigue
• Spans science specialties from ionized gases to materials science
Core Plasma
Boundary Plasma
Plasma Facing Material
20-100 M K 0.1-2 M K 800-3500 K
Energy and particles
Fuel and impurities
Ionization and transport
Trapping
Sputtering Evaporation
MAU 9 5/20/2003
Plasma Surface Interactions
Permeation
Trapping
Plasma conditions
density, T, flux
Impurities & recycling
Conditioning & coatings
Plasma facing material
MAU 10 5/20/2003
Science Involved in PFC Design
• Atomic and molecular physics for ionization, dissociation, and photon radiation of plasma and impurity species
• Surface physics for sputtering, chemical erosion, hydrogen trapping and release, surface segregation
• Materials science for nuclear radiation damage, thermal fatigue, stress corrosion, creep, bonding, and hydrogen trapping
• Engineering science for stress management, heat transfer, and component design
MAU 11 5/20/2003
Materials Selection and PFC Design
• Selection limited by capability for absorbing heat and minimization of plasma contamination
• Refractory materials have an advantage• Plasma interactions can change material
properties• Off-Normal events force compromise in material
selection and PFC design
MAU 12 5/20/2003
Magnetic Fusion Energy Heat Fluxes
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106
Duration (s)
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
Hea
t Flu
x (M
W/m
2 )
Fusion Divertor
Radiant Flux at Sun SurfaceFast Breeder
Fission Reactor
Fusion First Wall
Fusion Disruption
Fusion ELM
Rocket Nozzle
MAU 13 5/20/2003
Heat Flux Capability
Al Be C PyC Cr Co Cu Au Fe Mg Mo Ni Nb Pt Ag Ta Ti W V ZrMaterial
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lim
iting
Hea
t Flu
x (M
W/m
2 )
Typical Maximum
Normal Operation
Typical Minimum
MAU 14 5/20/2003
Materials Choices for PFCs
• Divertor applications– Only W and C are acceptable for the highest heat
flux (C limited because of T retention and neutron damage)
– With some radiation in the divertor Mo, Ta, and Nb(?) are candidates (Cu is not acceptable because of erosion)
• For first wall applications– Iron alloys (ferritic steel), V (?), Be, and all the
divertor materials
MAU 15 5/20/2003
Carbon Based Plasma Facing Materials
• Very high temperature operation possible• Thermal conduction is primarily by phonons
(radiation damage lowers performance)• Chemical reactions with atomic H are a major
issue (chemical erosion)• Control of tritium inventory in C:H layers is a
critical issue for ITER• Hydrogen is very mobile in C
MAU 16 5/20/2003
Tungsten Plasma Facing Material
• Second only to carbon in thermal performance• Tungsten is brittle, it melts, it is not low
activation, it cannot be welded• Can have low or no physical erosion in high
recycling divertor• H isotope retention is very low• W PFC surfaces must be divided• Blisters may form due to particle irradiation
MAU 17 5/20/2003
Beryllium First Wall PFM
• Very low Z• Very good oxygen getter• Good thermal properties• Low T retention unless thick oxide layers are
present• Low melting point (~1275C) (off-normal events
limit lifetime)
MAU 18 5/20/2003
Mixed Material Issues
• For example consider the case of a Be first wall and C or W divertor PFC system– Be deposition on C by transport through the
scrape-off layer will lower the chemical erosion of C (PISCES at UCSD)
– Be deposition on W can form lower melting point materials (W2Be, WBe, WBe12)
– The operating T for a high power divertor is several hundred to >2000 C making experiments difficult
MAU 19 5/20/2003
Active Cooling
• To realize the maximum potential for magnetic fusion energy devices must operate either long pulse or steady-state
• Steady-state means the thermal time constant of the PFC is much shorter than the plasma duration
• Water cooling is the method of choice now• In magnetic fusion reactors the use of Helium gas
cooling is the leading candidate• Only a few devices are exploring this regime now
MAU 20 5/20/2003
Off-Normal Operation
• The two main classes of off-normal events are:– Plasma current interruptions (often accompanied
by plasma motion)– Instabilities in the plasma edge that release short
bursts of energy and particle to the PFC (Edge Localized Modes or ELMS)
• Both restrict the maximum acceptable heat flux during normal operation because they require thickening of the plasma facing surface to prevent catastrophic failure of the PFC
MAU 21 5/20/2003
Off-Normal Mitigation Progress
• The lifetime of these actively cooled components is governed by disruption and ELM events.
• There has been significant progress on predicting disruptions and mitigating the effect of disruptions. – Neural network prediction of disruptions about 50
ms before they occur with a >90% accuracy– Massive gas puffing to mitigate halo currents,
energy deposition and current decay rates (liquid jets under development)
MAU 22 5/20/2003
Off-Normal Mitigation Progress
• Experiments have shown that ELMS can be mitigated by:– Double null operation– High triangularity operation– High edge density – Active divertor pumping– Coils to perturb the edge
• The full impact on plasma performance remains to be assessed for all options
MAU 23 5/20/2003
Bringing It All Together
• Successful PFC designs have progressed from short pulse devices (fractions of seconds) to tens of seconds of operation (even hours for actively cooled PFCs)
• Plasma contamination due to PFCs is routinely low on well designed devices
• Catastrophic failures are rare and have not occurred on the largest, most advance machines
• Actively cooled devices are rapidly growing in number
MAU 24 5/20/2003
Looking Forward
• Helium gas cooled PFCs are being designed for parts of ITER
• Liquid surface PFCs are at the fore-front of PFC research– May allow simultaneous heat and particle removal– May give access to unique plasma operating
regimes (very low particle recycling, flat density profiles, high edge temperatures)
• Control of off-normal events will allow further optimization of PFC designs and greater performance
MAU 25 5/20/2003
Porous Metal Heat Sinks (He)
• Promising designs have been found for Cu alloys
• Heat removal is approaching water values
• Pressure drop is ok.• Refractory metal research
just starting.• Helium gas purity is a key
issue but there appear to be solutions.
• Refractory alloy development is needed.
Area1Min Mean Max910.3 1,010 1,119
Area1Min Mean Max910.3 1,010 1,119
*>1,233°C
*<160.6°C
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1,000
1,200
Progress in helium cooling
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000year
h (W
/m2 K
)
microchannels dual channel pellets single channel pelletstungsten foam tungsten pellets water
MAU 26 5/20/2003
Status of Refractory He Cooled R&D
• Development of irradiation resistant refractory materials is a key issue
• Refractory PFM to refractory heat sink joining techniques remain to be proven
• Demonstration of He gas purity must be done• Requires low T edge plasma because the sputter
erosion can be eliminated.• High temperature gas produced (up to 1100C)
implying high electrical efficiency.
MAU 27 5/20/2003
Impact of ELMS
• ELM energy deposition severely limits the operating heat flux
• The thermal fatigue caused by ELMs has not been experimentally verified (could be very severe)
• ELMs will severely limit the lifetime of PFCs and may reduce reliability.
• Reducing ELM energy to less than 0.5 MJ/m2 is sufficient to increase the margin for failure.
MAU 28 5/20/2003
Liquid Surface PFCs
• Liquids being considered are: Lithium, Gallium, Tin (SnLi mixture)
• Flowing Liquids have high heat flux capability (up to ~50 MW/m2)
• Key Issues are:– Magnetohydrodynamic effects on flowing
conducting liquids (much modeling needed)– Materials compatibility (corrosion)– Practical methods– Particle pumping capability (mostly He)
MAU 29 5/20/2003
Opportunities for Research Summary
• Refractory Materials development including joining to heat sinks
• Gas cooled refractory heat sink inventions• Off-normal event mitigation methods and
detection methods• Liquid metal PFC MHD modeling, methods for
injection and control, and materials development