People, Problems, Policies - The Burma Environmental Working Group
Transcript of People, Problems, Policies - The Burma Environmental Working Group
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
ISBN: 978-974-350-515-7
© Copyright June 2011
Published by:The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
Website: www.bewg.org
Printed by: Wanida Press, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tel. 66 53 110503-4
Made in Thailand© Copyright is reserved by The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. 08
RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 10
1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 13
2. COUNTRY FACTS ...................................................................................... 14 2.1 DEMOGRAPHY ...................................................................................... 14 2.2 NATURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................... 15
3. ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND POLICIES IN BURMA................................... 17 3.1 NationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs .................................. 18 3.2 EnvironmentalPoliciesandLaws ......................................................... 19 3.3 ImpactAssessmentsinBurma ............................................................. 19 3.4 EnvironmentalProvisionsinthe2008Constitution ............................. 20 3.5 NationalSustainableDevelopmentStrategy ........................................ 21 3.6 InternationalCommitments ................................................................. 22 3.7 EnvironmentalisminBurma ................................................................. 26
4. LAW AND POLICY ON FORESTRY AND AGRICULTURAL LAND .................... 33 4.1 ForestryLawsandPolicies .................................................................... 33 4.2 LandLawsandPolicies ......................................................................... 36 4.3 EconomicdevelopmentandnaturalresourcesinBurma .................... 42
5. THREATS TO ENVIRONMENT AND LIVELIHOODS ........................................ 51 5.1 LargeDams ........................................................................................... 53 5.2 OilandGasExtraction .......................................................................... 58 5.3 Mining .................................................................................................. 61 5.4 Deforestation ....................................................................................... 65 5.5 LargeScaleAgriculturalConcessions ................................................... 70 5.6 IllegalWildlifeTrade ............................................................................. 80 5.7 ClimateChange .................................................................................... 81
6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................... 83
Contents
01
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Burma EnvironmentalWorkingGroup (BEWG)would like to acknowledge thecontributionsof the followingorganizations and individuals for their support for theproductionofthereport.
AnotherDevelopmentforBurma
InformationContribution:ArakanRiverNetworkBurmaRiversNetworkEthnicCommunityDevelopmentForumKarenEnvironmentCommitteeKarenniEvergreenYukiAkimotoMartyBergoffenClydeFawkesJeremyMakZaoNoamShweMyoThantSteveThompsonNickVeidelisKatrinaWinters
Donors:DagHammarskjöldFoundationKarenEnvironmentalandSocialActionNetwork
Manyotherindividualswhocannotbenamedgavewelcomeinputtothedrafts.
BEWGalsoappreciatestheeffortsoftheForestResourceEnvironmentDevelopmentandConservationAssociation,EcosystemConservationandCommunityDevelopmentInitiative,andother local,nationaland internationalorganizations thatareworking to conserveBurma’secosystems.
About the Burma Environmental Working Group
TheBurmaEnvironmentalWorkingGroup(BEWG)bringstogetherBurmafocusedethnicenvironmentalandsocialorganizations.MemberorganizationsmonitorBurmadevelopmentpolicyandadvocatesforalternativedevelopmentpoliciesmeetingtheirspecifictraditionalandcomprehensiveunderstandingoflocalsustainability.BEWGprovidesaforumformemberorganizationstocombinethesuccesses,knowledge,expertiseandvoicesofethnicpeoplesinpursuitofnotjustlocallivelihoods,butsustainableandpeacefulnational,regionalandinternationaldevelopmentpolicy.Memberscollaborateonresearch,reporting,advocacycampaigns,capacity-buildinginitiativesandpolicyformulation.BEWGalsonetworkswithnon-memberorganizationstoencourageharmonyanddiversityinitsownactivitiesaswell
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
02
asstrengthendemocracyandcivilsocietyinBurma.
MembersoftheBEWGfirstcametogetherin2005throughaseminarorganizedbytheAnotherDevelopmentforBurmainitiative(ADfB).TheADfBprojectprovidesaplatformforpolitical,communityandissuebasedgroupswithintheBurmademocracymovementtoconsiderlong-termchallengesanddevelopmentalternativesforthefutureofBurma.Untilnow,mostBEWGactivitieshavebeenorganizedwithsupportfromtheADfBplatform.
ThefollowingorganizationsaremembersoftheBurmaEnvironmentalWorkingGroup.
Arakan Oil Watch (AOW),foundedin2006,isanindependentnon-governmentalorganizationthataimstoprotecthumanrightsandtheenvironmentfromextractiveindustriesinArakanStateandinBurma.AOWeducatesaffectedpeoplesontheseissues,developsandpromotesoilandgasrevenuetransparencystandards,andconductsinternationaladvocacy.AOWisanactivecorememberoftheShweGasMovementandamemberofSouthEastAsiaOilWatch. EachmonthAOWpublishesTheShweGasBulletin in English andBurmese, anewslettercoveringthelatestdevelopmentsinBurma’soilandnaturalgasindustry.Website:www.arakanoilwatch.org
Bridging Rural Integrated Development and Grassroots Empowerment (BRIDGE) workstogetherwithruralcommunitiesimpactedbypoliticalandsocio-economicchangeinKachinstatetostrengthentheircapacitiestomanagetheirownnaturalresources.BRIDGEsupportstheircommunity-baseddevelopmentactivitiesandbuildscollaborationsandpartnershipsthatadvocateforsustainabledevelopmentandfosteracultureofpeace.
EarthRights International (ERI)isagroupofactivists,organizers,andlawyerswithexpertiseinhumanrights,theenvironment,andcorporateandgovernmentaccountability.Since1995,ERIhasworkedinBurmatomonitortheimpactsofthemilitaryregime’spoliciesandactivitiesonlocalpopulationsandecosystems.Throughtheirtrainingprogram,ERItrainsyoungenvironmentalactivistsfromdiverseethnicbackgroundsinBurmatoempoweryoungleaderswithskillsandknowledgetoworkonearthrightsissuesintheircommunities.Inaddition,ERIworksalongsideaffectedcommunitygroupstopreventhumanrightsandenvironmental abusesassociatedwith large-scalenatural resourceprojects inBurma.Website:www.earthrights.org
Kachin Development Networking Group (KDNG), foundedin2004, isanetworkofcivilsociety groups anddevelopmentorganizations inKachin State. KDNG’spurpose is toeffectivelyworkforsustainabledevelopmentbasedonindigenousknowledgeandculturally-appropriate environmentalmanagement and conservationmethods. KDNGworks tomaintaintheintegrityoflandandforest,andempowerindigenouspeoplebyprovidingawarenessonenvironmentissues,especiallyrelatingtohumanrights,environmentalrightsand indigenous rights. It achieves thesegoals through trainings,workshops, research,documentation,andadvocacy.Website:www.aksyu.com
The Karen Environmental and Social Action Network (KESAN)wasestablishedin2001asthefirst local community-basedorganization to raiseenvironmental awarenessamongKarenpeople.KESANworkstoempowerandeducatecommunitiesandlocalinstitutionstorevitalizeexistingindigenousknowledgeandpracticesforincreasedlivelihoodsecurity
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
03
inKarenandKachinStatesandinareasalongtheThai-Burmeseborder.KESANstrivestobuild up local capacities in forest and natural resourcemanagement, raise publicenvironmental awareness, and support community-baseddevelopment initiatives. Inaddition toplayinga leading role inenvironmental lawandpolicy formulation,KESANadvocatesforenvironmentalpoliciesanddevelopmentprioritiesthatensuresustainableecological,social,cultural,andeconomicbenefitsandpromotegenderequity.Website:www.kesan.asia
The Lahu National Development Organization (LNDO)wassetupbyleadingLahudemocracyactivists inMarch1997toadvocateforthewelfareandwell-beingoftheLahupeople,includingthepromotionofalternativestodestructivedevelopmentprojectsandopiumcultivation.LNDOseekstoprotectthelivelihoodsandlandsofLahuandAkhapeoplesandto increaseunderstanding among the local ethnic nationalities about human rights,democracy, federalism,communitydevelopment,andhealth issues.LNDOalsoaimstodevelopunityandcooperationamongtheLahuandotherhighlandersfromShanStateandtoprovideopportunitiesfordevelopmentofcivicleadershipskillsamonglocalgroups.
Network for Environmental and Economic Development (NEED)wasfoundedinMarch2006.NEEDisanonprofitNGOworkingtostrengthenBurmesecivilsocietysothatallthepeopleofBurmamaybenefitfromthepracticeofindigenousandholisticdevelopmentstrategies,basedoneconomically,environmentally,andsociallysustainableideas.NEEDconcentrateson thepromotionofenvironmental conservation, sustainableagriculture,andeconomicdevelopmentinBurma.Website:www.need-burma.org
The Pa-Oh Youth Organization (PYO)was setup in1998striving forpeaceand justicethroughempoweringyouth.PYOpublishedthereportRobbing the Future inJune2009aftertwoyearsofresearchatthesiteofBurma’slargestironmineandthePangpetNo.5SteelMillinShanState.PYOcontinuestomonitorthesituationandeducatecommunitiesoftheenvironmentalandsocialimpactsofthisandotherminingprojects.Website:www.pyo-org.blogspot.com
Shan Sapawa Environmental Organization (Sapawa)worksalongtheThai-BurmeseborderandinsideBurmatopromoteenvironmentalprotectionandhumanrightsinShanState,Burma.Sapawawasestablishedin2003byShanalumniofEarthRightsSchoolandtheShanState School forNationalities Youthwhohadbecome increasingly concerned at theenvironmentalsituationinShanState.Sapawa’svisionisajustandpeacefulShanStatefreeofenvironmentaldestructionandexploitation.ThemissionofSapawaistoempowerShan communities toprotect their rights and livelihoods, andpreserve their naturalresources,andtoexposethedestructionoftheenvironmentandhumanrightsviolationsoccurringinShanStatetolocalpeoplesaswellastheinternationalcommunity,inordertofindwaystopreventsuchviolations.Website:shansapawa.org
The Shwe Gas Movement (SGM) isanon-governmentalorganizationcampaigningagainsttheShweGasProjectandChina’sTrans-BurmaPipelines,forHumanRights,EnvironmentJusticeand revenue transparency inoil andgas sector. SGMspecializes in fact-finding,traininggrassrootsandcommunityleadersandadvocacycampaign.ItsmembersincludetheAllArakanStudentsandYouths’Congress,ArakanOilWatchandShweGasMovement(India)anddedicatedactivistsinBurma.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
04
Notes to the reader
In1989,thegovernmentinBurmachangedtheofficialnameofthecountryfromtheUnionofBurmatotheUnionofMyanmari,alongwithnamesofcities,districts,andstates,includingthenamesofplacesmentionedinthisreport.Inrespectandrecognitionofethnicandindigenouspeople’snames forancestral lands,however, this reportuses thehistoricalnameswiththeexceptionofdirectquotes.
Footnotesareclarificationpointstogivethereadermorebackgroundinformationnecessarytounderstandasection’scontext.Endnoteslistreferencesused.
InBurma,severaldifferentmeasurementsystemsareused,includingthemetricsystem,the international system,andothernationaland localizedmeasurements. This reportutilizes variousmeasurement systems, although there is a preference formetricmeasurements.Conversionsforthemostcommonmeasurementsinthereportarelistedbelow.Numbershavebeenroundedtothethreesignificantdigits.
1acre=0.405hectares1hectare=2.47acres1kilometer=0.621miles1mile=1.61kilometers1squarekilometer=100hectares=0.386squaremiles=247acres1kilogram=2.21pounds1pound=0.454kilograms1ton=2,000pounds=907kilograms1 tical=0.0163kilograms=0.0360pounds1 viss=100ticals=1.63kilogram
Burma’snationalcurrencyisthekyat(MMK).Forreference,equivalentsinAmericandollars($USD)areoftenshown.Althoughtheofficialexchangerateissetat6.31MMKper$1USD,thereportusestheunofficialmarketratewhereeconomictransactionsarecarriedoutandisthereforemoremeaningful.$1USD=30THB=approximately880MMK
i In2010intheleaduptotheelections,thenamewasofficiallychangedtotheRepublicoftheUnionofMyanmar.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
05
Acronyms
AAC AnnualAllowableCut
ADB AsianDevelopmentBank
ADfB AnotherDevelopmentforBurma
AOW ArakanOilWatch
ASEAN AssociationofSoutheastAsianNations
BANCA BiodiversityandNatureConservationAssociation
BEWG BurmaEnvironmentalWorkingGroup
BRIDGE BridgingRuralIntegratedDevelopmentandGrassrootsEmpowerment
BSS BurmaSelectionSystem
CBO CommunityBasedOrganization
CDB ConventiononBiologicalDiversity
CPB CommunistPartyofBurma
DAP DepartmentofAgricultureandPlanning
DG DirectorGeneral
DHF DagHammarskjöldFoundation
DKBA DemocraticKarenBuddhistArmy
DZGD DryZoneGreeningDepartment
ECODEV EconomicallyProgressiveEcosystemDevelopment
EIA EnvironmentalImpactAssessment
ERI EarthRightsInternational
FD ForestDepartment
FREDA ForestResourceEnvironmentDevelopmentandConservationAssociation
GA GeneralAssembly
GEF UnitedNationsGlobalEnvironmentFacility
GMS GreaterMekongSubregion(definedbytheADBasBurma,Thailand,Lao,Cambodia,Vietnam,andYunnanProvince,China)
ILO InternationalLaborOrganization
INGO InternationalNongovernmentalOrganization
IUCN WorldConservationUnion(InternationalUnionfortheConservationofNature)
KDNG KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup
KEG KarenniEvergreen
KESAN KarenEnvironmentalandSocialActionNetwork
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
06
KHRG KarenHumanRightsGroup
KIA KachinIndependenceArmy
KIO KachinIndependenceOrganization
KNLA KarenNationalLiberationArmy
KNU KarenNationalUnion
KORD KarenOrganizationofReliefandDevelopment
KTWG KarenTeacherWorkingGroup
LMC LandManagementCommittee
LNDO LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization
PYO Pa-OhYouthOrganization
MoAI MinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation
MOGE MyanmarOilandGasEnterprise
MPCE MyanmarPerennialCropsEnterprise
MTE MyanmarTimberEnterprise
NBSAP NationalBiodiversityStrategyandActionPlan
NCEA NationalCommissiononEnvironmentalAffairs
NDAA NationalDemocraticAllianceArmy
NDAK NewDemocraticArmy–Kachin
NEED NetworkforEnvironmentalandEconomicDevelopment
NGO NongovermentalOrganization
REDD ReducingEmissionsfromDeforestationandForestDegradation
ROAP UNEP’sRegionalOfficeforAsiaandthePacific
SLRD SettlementandLandRecordsDepartment
SPDC StatePeaceandDevelopmentCouncil
SLORC StateLawandOrderRestorationCouncil
SSA-S ShanStateArmy–South
TPDC TownshipPeaceandDevelopmentCouncil
UNDP UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgram
UNEP UnitedNationsEnvironmentProgram
UN-REDD UnitedNationsCollaborativeProgramonReducingEmissionsfromDeforestationandForestDegradationinDevelopingCountries
UWSA UnitedWaStateArmy
WCS WorldConservationSociety
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
07
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Burmahasextensivebiodiversityandabundantnaturalresources,whichhaveinrecentyearsbeenthreatenedbymilitarization,large-scaleresourceextraction,andinfrastructuredevelopment.Burmahas some lawsandpolicies related toprotectingpeopleand theenvironment,but the country lacks thenecessaryadministrativeand legal structures,standards,safeguardsandpoliticalwilltoenforcesuchprovisions.Thecountryisalsoaparty to several international treaties relating to theenvironment, including thoseonprotectionofbiodiversityandindigenouspeoples,wildlife,andcounteringclimatechange.Itisunclear,however,howthecontentsofthosetreatiesthathavebeenratifiedhavebeenincorporatedintodomesticlaw.
ManyorganizationsareactiveinBurmaonprojectsandprogramsrelatedtoenvironmentalprotectionandsustainabledevelopment.Thisincludesabroadrangeofcommunity-basedorganizations,grassrootsorganizations,nationalandinternationalNGOs,UNagencies,andchurchgroupsbothbasedingovernment-controlledareasofBurma(‘inside’)andthosebasedintheThaiandChineseborderregions(‘bordergroups’).Manyorganizationstakethe‘traditional’conservationapproachortherights-basedapproachorboth.Organizationsthatareusingarights-basedapproachworkfromaperspectiveofsustainabledevelopmentandlivelihoodsandsubsequentlyfocusonissuessuchasfoodsecurity,landtenureandrights,andcommunitydevelopmentandorganizing.Conservationorganizationstendtofocusspecificallyonenvironmentalprotection,althoughwithvaryingstrategiestoachievetheir common goal. Organizationsworking on environmental issues also focus onenvironmental awareness, educationand training, policydevelopment, advocacyandnetworking.
Communitiescontinuetobeexcludedfromprotectedforestareas,threateningtheirforest-basedlivelihoods.The1990sand2000switnessedseverelogging,firstalongtheThai-BurmaborderandthenalongtheChinaborderinnorthernBurma.Althoughtheloggingrushhassomewhatsubsidedalongtheseborders,thegovernmentandmilitarycontinuetoallocateloggingconcessionstoChineseandBurmesebusinesspeople,irrespectiveofnationalandlocallawsregulatingsustainableforestrypractices.Timber,however,contributesmuchlesstoGDPasotherresourcesectorsboom.Communityforestryispositionedtochallengethemanner inwhichtimberresourcesaremanaged,providingsomepromisingdevolutionii trends.
LandtenureremainsveryweakinBurma.Thestateownsallthe landandresources inBurma,withmostvillagershavingnoformallandtitlefortheircustomaryagriculturalland.Newpolicieshavebeenputinplaceallocatinglandconcessionstoprivateentitieswhichdonotrespectcustomarylandrightsorinformallandholdings.Therearenosafeguardstoprotectfarmersfromtheonslaughtofcapitalismormechanismstohelpthembenefit.
Controlovernaturalresourcesisamajorcauseofconflictinethnicareas,wherethemajorityofBurma’snaturalresourcesremain.ForeigndirectinvestmentinBurmaisconcentratedinenergyandextractivesectorsandoftenresultsinmilitarizationanddisplacement.Recently
ii adelegationofauthoritybyacentralgovernmenttolocalgoverningunits
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
08
therehasbeenheightened interest fromcountries in the region formore investmentopportunities.Giventhelackofsoundeconomicpolicyandunwillingnessofthestatetoreconcilewithethnicarmedgroups,anincreaseinforeigninvestmentcouldhaveamajorimpactontheenvironmentandcommunitieslivingintheseareas.
Whiletheydonotprovideloans,internationalfinancialinstitutionssuchastheWorldBankandInternationalMonetaryFundremainengagedinBurma.TheAsianDevelopmentBankinparticularprovidesassistancethroughvariouschannelsandfacilitatesprivateinvestment.
Burma is currently facingmany threats to the natural environment and sustainablelivelihoods,suchasconstructionoflargedams,oilandgasextraction,mining,deforestation,large-scaleagriculturalconcessions,illegalwildlifetradeandclimatechange.ThemajorityofBurma’sincomecomesfromsellingoffnaturalresources,includingbillionsofdollarsfromgasandhydropowerdevelopment. Investment comes fromcountrieswithin theregion–mostsignificantlyChina,IndiaandThailand.Malaysia,Singapore,Japan,VietnamandKoreaarealsokeyinvestorslookingtoincreaseinvestmentsaftertheelections.Theseresourceextractiveinvestmentsdamagetheenvironmentandthreatenlocalresource-basedlivelihoods,particularlyinethnicareas.
InordertotakestepstowardsecologicallyandsociallyresponsibledevelopmentinBurma,Burmamusthaveasoundpolicyframeworkforenvironmentalprotectionandsustainabledevelopment that enables citizens to take part in decisionmaking about their owndevelopment,andensuresresponsibleprivatesectorinvestment.Untilthen,newforeigninvestorsinvestinginenergy,extractiveandplantationsectorsshouldrefrainfrominvesting.Existinginvestorsshouldimmediatelyceaseallproject-relatedwork-particularlyinsensitiveareasthroughoutBurma-untiladequatesafeguardsareinplacetoensureinvestmentdoesnotleadtounnecessarydestructionofthenaturalenvironmentandlocallivelihoods.Atthesametime,InternationalNGOsandUNagenciesshouldensurepeoplearerecognizedaskeyactorsintheirowndevelopment,ratherthanpassiverecipientsofcommoditiesandservices;andcivilsocietyorganizationsshouldempowercommunitiesthroughoutBurmatounderstandtheirrights.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
09
RECOMMENDATIONS
To Burma’s Government
Environmentalpolicyandlawmustbebasedoninternationallawsandstandards,includingstandardsforEnvironmentalImpactAssessments(EIA)andSocialImpactAssessments(SIA).ThedevelopmentprocessmustalsoincorporatetheprincipleofandFree,PriorandInformedConsent(FPIC).
Holdopenconsultationswithabroadspectrumofstakeholdersindevelopingenvironmentlawsandpoliciesbeforetheyareapproved,includingestablishingadraftingcommitteewithrepresentativesfromdifferentsectorsandethnicgroups.
EIA’sandSIA’sshouldbedraftedinconsultationwithcivilsociety(includingethnicgroups)that are in accordancewith international best practice. These assessmentsmust beconductedbyindependentthirdparties,throughaprocessthatensuresaccesstorelevantinformation,adequateparticipationofaffectedcommunitiesandpublichearingstomitigatetheimpactofdevelopmentprojectsonlocalcommunitiesandtheenvironment.
Developanequitablebenefit-sharingsysteminallinfrastructure,extractive,energyanddevelopmentprojects.
Developlaws,policiesandinstitutionsthatprotectcommunitiesandindividualfarmers’livelihoodsandlandsfromtheimpactsofopeningnewmarkets,especiallyfromdomesticandinternationalagribusinesses.
Enactlandlawsandpoliciesthatrecognizeandrespectcustomarylandrights,entitlementandtenurerights.Forexample,‘rotationalfarming’shouldberecognizedasonetypeoftraditionalagriculturesysteminuplandareas.
Abolishthe1953LandNationalizationActandupholdthestillexisting1963LawSafeguardingPeasantsRightstoensurefarmers’landsandlivelihoodsareprotectedfromconfiscationbylaw.
Ratify core human and environmental rights treaties. Developmandatory laws andregulations inaccordancewith these international lawsand standards to regulateandmonitorplantation,energyandextractiveindustries,includingnationalprivatecompanies,stateownedenterprises, and foreignprivateand stateownedcompaniesoperating inBurma.
Respectindividualandcommunityrightsintheprocessofcompulsoryacquisitionoflandinaccordancewith internationalbestpractice.This includes theprovisionofadequateinformation,consultation,andfairandjustcompensationoradequatealternativehousingandlivelihoodpriortoevictionfromtheland.Duringtheeviction,theremustbenouseofviolenceordisproportionateforce.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
10
Establish independentbodies suchasaNational EnvironmentalCommission,NationalHumanRightsCommissionandAnti-corruptionunitwithadequatebudgetanddecision-makingpowertoensuresocialandenvironmentaljustice.
Enactpoliciesthatarerights-based,people-centered,andpro-poor.Thisensurestherightsoflocalpeopletothesustainableuseandmanagementoftheirresources,suchascommunityforestryandpaymentsforecologicalservices.
Applytheprinciplesofsustainableandequitabledevelopmenttoeconomicdevelopmenttomakesurepoliciesandpracticesareecologicallysound,sociallyequitable,economicallyviableandculturallyappropriate.
To the Private sector and state owned enterprises
Existingforeigninvestors,aswellasprivatecompanies,stateownedenterprisesandjointventureswithinthecountrymust:
Applyinternationalsustainabledevelopmentprinciplesandpractices(suchasFPIC,financialdisclosure,benefitsharing,conductingEIAandSIAs).
ConductinclusiveandmeaningfulEIAandSIAsinaccordancewithinternationalbestpracticethroughaprocessthatensuresaccesstorelevantinformation,adequateparticipationofaffectedcommunitiesandpublichearingstomitigatetheimpactofdevelopmentprojectsonlocalcommunitiesandtheenvironment.
Abideby international sustainabledevelopment initiatives andmechanisms, such asguidelinesonsustainableoilpalmdevelopmentandForestLawEnforcement,GovernanceandTrade(FLEGT).
Makeevery effort to avoid involuntary resettlement. In caseswhere resettlement isinevitable,thereshouldbeaclearplanforresettlementandcompensationprocessesforrelocation, landconfiscationorpropertydamagetoaffectedpeopleasaresultof largescaledevelopmentprojects implementedbyprivate companies, stateenterprisesandgovernment.ForeigninvestorsshouldfollowtheresettlementpoliciesoftheInternationalFinanceCorporation.
Immediatelyceaseallproject-relatedworkuntiladequatesafeguardsareinplace,particularlyinsensitiveareasthroughoutBurma.
Foreigninvestorsshouldrefrainfromanyformofnewengagementintheplantation,energyandextractivesectorsinBurmauntilthepeopleofBurmacanmeaningfullyparticipateindevelopmentdecisions,preconditionsforresponsibleinvestmentareinplace,andadverseimpactscanbemitigated.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
11
To Civil Society Organizations
CSOsworkingbothinsideBurmaandonthebordersshouldrepresentpeoples’viewsinadvocating forenvironmental lawandpolicydevelopment, andmonitor the stateandprivate companies’ businesses tobe in accordwith socially just andenvironmentallysustainabledevelopmentgoals.
To International NGOs
InternationalNGOsworkingontheenvironmentmustunderstandthelocalpoliticalandsocialcontext(includingthehumanrightssituation),conductneedsassessmentsinclusively;‘donoharm’tolocalpeople’srightsandlivelihoods;andfocusonbothpolicyandpracticechangetowardsenvironmentalprotectionandsustainablelivelihoods.
To UN agencies
UNagenciesshouldfacilitaterealpolicyandpracticechangewithmeaningfulparticipationofallstakeholders,andoperateaccordingtotheUNrightsbasedapproachstatementofCommonUnderstanding,underwhich‘peoplearerecognizedaskeyactorsintheirowndevelopment,ratherthanpassiverecipientsofcommoditiesandservices’.
TheUN should ensure that theUNDeclarationof theRights of Indigenous Peoples(particularly the conceptof FreePrior InformedConsent) is reaffirmed in anyREDD+agreement,andensuredintheimplementationandmonitoringonREDD+.
To International Financial Institutions
Until the people of Burma canmeaningfully participate in development decisions,preconditionsforresponsibleinvestmentareinplace,andadverseimpactscanbemitigated,thenIFIsshouldrefrainfromanyformofnewengagementwithBurma.
Iftheydoengage,Internationalfinancialinstitutions(IFIs)mustapplytheirownenvironmentalandsocialsafeguardpolicies,followInternationalFinanceCorporationstandardsandUNFrameworks(ie.oncommunityengagementandFPIC).
IFIsmustmakesurethatanyfuturenationaldevelopmentplanforBurmaisbasedonproperneedsassessmentsandaparticipatoryconsultationprocesswhichensurethatitmeetstheinterestsofthepeople.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
12
1. INTRODUCTION
ThisreportbytheBurmaEnvironmentalWorkingGroupaimstoachievethefollowingmainobjectives:i)toreviewthecurrentstateofenvironmentalprotectioninBurma(includingdomesticandinternationalpoliciesandmechanisms,andtheroleoflocalandinternationalNGOsandUNagencies),ii)tohighlightkeyenvironmentalproblemsandtheimpactsonlocalpeopleand theenvironmentand to iii) provideanalysison conflictovernaturalresourcesinethnicareasbeforeandaftertheelectionsin2010.
The report begins by reviewing international commitments, domesticmechanisms,governmentpoliciesonland,forestandeconomy(relatedtotheresourcesector),andtheroleof local and internationalNGOsbased insideandoutside the countryworking inenvironmentalconservationandlivelihoodimprovement.Itthenhighlightsthethreatstolocalpeopleandtheenvironment. Italsoprovidesrecommendationsforpolicies, laws,institutionsandmechanismsthatmeetinternationalstandardsinprotectingtheenvironmentandcommunitylivelihoods.RecommendationsareaimedatpolicyandlawmakersinpostelectionBurma,domesticand foreign investors, stateownedcompanies, internationalfinancialinstitutions,UNagencies,internationalNGOsandcivilsocietyorganizations.
TheideaforthisreportoriginatedatanAnotherDevelopmentforBurmathematicseminarinearly2006inChiangMai,Environment Seminar on Burma.Itwasinitiallyaresponsetoareportentitled“InvestmentOpportunitiesforBiodiversityConservationinMyanmar,”publishedin2005byBirdlifeInternational,UNDP-BurmaandCriticalEcosystemsPartnershipFund(CEPF).Thereportoutlineskeybiodiversityareas,alistofthreatenedspecies,andconservationcorridors,aswellas identifiespriorities forconservation investment. It is,however,entirelybasedonthebiophysicalsciencesandtechnicalexpertisewithoutanymentionofethnicareasandtheconflictrootedinBurma,mega-developmentprojectsthatresultinmilitarization,displacement,widespreadhumanrightsabusesandenvironmentaldegradation,andtheroleofethniccommunitiesinmaintainingtraditionalnaturalresourcemanagementsystemswhichprotecttheenvironment.
Itwasdiscussedattheseminarhowconservationplanningcontinuestoexcludethepeopleswhoforcenturieshavelivedintheareastobe‘protected’,andthatinBurmalargescaleconservation initiatives involve engagementwith the government. The approachofinternationalconservationorganizationsisoftenlargelyanecologically-centredconservationapproachpracticedbythemainattheexpenseofanysocialorpeople-focusedconcerns,andincertaincaseslinkedtohumanrightsabusesandincreasedaccesstocontestedethnicterritory.Thisbringsintoquestiontherealmotivationsofthegovernmentinsettinguplarge-scaleconservationprojects.Large-scaleenvironmentalprojects,particularlyinethnicareas,mightalsomaskeconomicormilitaryobjectivesfortheregime.
Anideaemergedforareportonthestateofenvironmentfromethnicperspectivesthatwouldput together the situation inethnic areasanddemonstratewhatethnicbasedenvironmentalorganizationsbasedinThailandaredoingfromarightsbasedapproach.Itwasalsodecidedthatthereportwouldincludetheinternationalcommitmentsthatthegovernmenthasrelatedtotheenvironment,aswellaslegislationanddomesticmechanismsrelatedtoprotectingtheenvironmentinlivelihoods.Thereportwasthensplitintotwo
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
13
parts,with the first part published in 2009 called “Accessible Alternatives: EthnicCommunities’Contribution to SocialDevelopmentandEnvironmentalConservation inBurma”,which specifically focuses on the activities of ethnic based environmentalorganizationsbasedinThailand.
Withthe2010electionloomingandtheeconomyopeningitbecameimportanttohighlightbilateral resource extraction agreements between theBurmese leaders and foreigngovernmentsandcorporationswhicharehaving,andwill continue tohave,anegativeimpactoncommunitiesandtheenvironmentparticularlyinethnicareas.Atthesametimeabroaderdiscussionwasaddedofdomesticprocessesthatsupportprivateinvestmentandthelackofadequatesafeguardsforfarmersthroughoutthecountry.
TheBEWGhopesthatthereportwillprovidepolicyandpracticerecommendationsforpolicymakers,investors,internationalcommunityandcivilsocietygroupsworkinginsideandoutsidethecountrysothattheyarewellinformed,andthatwhentheyimplementaproject inBurma,theyhavefullawarenessofthecomplications, impacts,andrightsofaffectedcommunities.
Thereportisrelevanttotheentirecountry.Manysectionsfocusmorenarrowlyonethnicareasofthecountry,whileseveralsectionsgivemoregeneraloverviewsofemergingtrendsrelevanttothewholecountry.Finally,noattentionisgiventourban-basedenvironmentalissues.
2. COUNTRY FACTS
Burmaisaresource-richnationandyetitremainsoneoftheleastdevelopednationsonearth.ThelatestUNDP’sHumanDevelopmentReportrankedBurma132outof169ontheHumanDevelopmentIndex.iii1Atapproximately$435USD,percapitaGDPinBurmaranksamongstthelowestintheworldandrecentresearchshowsthat“removenetexportsfromtheequationand thedomesticeconomyhasbeengrowingata rate that falls shortofpopulationgrowth–implyingthatpercapitaGDPhasbeendeclininginrecentyears”.2
2.1 DEMOGRAPHY
TheabsenceofdependabledataandthecomplexitiesinethnicidentityandclassificationandrendersitdifficulttoestimatethetotalpopulationofBurmaandvirtuallyimpossibletogaugetheexactmakeupofthenation.3Thelastreliablecensuswasconductedin1931(the1983censuswasonlypartial,asnumbersfromconflictareaswerenotrecorded).4Usingreproductiveandfertilityhealthsurveys,theWorldHealthOrganizationestimatesthatin2003, thereweremore than52millionpeople inBurma,whichhadat thetimea2%populationgrowthrate.5Burmaisamulti-ethniccountry.Thelargestethnicgroup,Burmans,accountforapproximatedtwo-thirdsofthepopulace.Otherethnicandindigenouspeoplesreportedlycompriseatleast40%ofthepopulationandliveson60%oftheavailableland.6
iii TheHumanDevelopmentIndexmeasuresdevelopmentcombiningindicatorsofeducation,lifeexpectancyandincomehttp://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi/.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
14
TheShanandKareneachconstituteapproximately10percentofthepopulation,andtheWa,Chin,Akha,Kachin,Karenni,Lahu,Kokang,Tavoyan,Pa-Oh,Naga,Mon,Kayan,Arakan,Rohingya,Palaung,Indian,Danu,andChineseeachmakeupnomorethanfivepercentofthepopulation.7Themajorityofthecountry’snon-Burmanethnicgroupsliveintheborderregions.
2.2 NATURAL RESOURCES
ManyethnicandindigenouspeoplesinBurmaaredependentonnaturalresourcesfortheirlivelihoodsandtraditionallyhavemaintainednaturalresourcemanagementsystemsthatensurethesustainabilityofthesenaturalresources.Inrecentyears,militarization,large-scaleresourceextraction,andinfrastructuredevelopmentaredestroyingthenaturalenvironmentandthreateningtheselocalresourcemanagementsystemswhicharestillpracticedinlowdensityareaswithampleswiddenfieldsavailable (seesection5ofthisreport).
2.2.1 Biodiversity
Previously knownas the “last frontierofbiodiversity inAsia,”Burmahasa seeminglyunparalleledabundanceofanimalandplantlife.AlmostallofthecountryislocatedinsidetheIndo-BurmaBiodiversityHotspot,oneoftheworld’s34“richestandmostthreatenedreservoirsofplantandanimallife”asidentifiedbyConservationInternational.8Sinceitstillhousesawidearrayofplantandanimalspeciesalreadygeographicallyextinctinneighboringstates,BurmaisacountryofparticularconcerninregardstobiodiversityconservationintheSoutheastAsiaregion.9
AccordingtoarecentEarthscanpublication,Burmaundoubtedlyhas“anexceptionallevelofbiologicaldiversity.”10Intermsoffauna,populationsofmanycriticallyendangeredspeciessuchastheone-hornedrhinocerosandGurney’sPittacanstillbefoundinBurma.11Threehundredidentifiedmammalsand7,000plantspeciescanbefoundinthecountry.12Burmaalsohas1,027knownbird species—thehighestbiodiversity inbirdsofany country inSoutheastAsia.13Fourbirdspeciesareendemic,and19othersarerestrictedrangebirds.iv Burmaisalsohometo425reptileandamphibianspecies,and350freshwaterfish.14 Inaddition,manyfish,invertebrates,andplantsstillneedtobesurveyedandclassified.
2.2.2 Forests
BurmaishometoAsia’smostextensiveintacttropicalforestecosystems.ManydifferentforestecosystemsexistinBurma,includingDeltamangroves,lowlandtropicalrainforestsinTennaserimDivision(Tanintharyi),teakforests,semi-deciduousforestsfurthernorth,andsub-alpineinnorthernKachinState,amongothers.Inaddition,Burmapossessestheworld’sonlyremaininggoldenteakforests.However,alltheseforestsystemsareunderthreat.Themajorityofclosedforest is foundinethnicborderregions,especiallyKarenState,KarenniStateandTennasserimDivisionalongtheThailandborder,KachinStatealongtheYunnan,Chinaborder,ArakanStatealongtheBangladeshborder,andSagaingDivisionnexttonortheastIndia.
iv Restrictedrangebirdshaveaglobalbreedingrangeoflessthan50,000squarekilometers.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
15
Accordingtothe2006EnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)report,39%ofBurma’sforestsaremixeddeciduous,26%hillforests,16%evergreen,and10%drythornyforests.15 Dipterocarpforestsaccountfor5%,withtheremaining4%belongtomangroves,beachanddune,andswampforests.
2.2.3 Coastal Areas
Burmahasa2,832kilometer-longcoastlineextendingfromthecountry’swesttosoutheastfromtheBayofBengaltotheAndamanSea.Alongthisstretch,alluvialflatsandshelteredmuddyareasarehometomangrovetreesandshrubs,keystonespeciesthatnotonlyserveashabitattocrawfish,shrimp,crabs,andnumerousotheraquaticanimals,butalsoprotectcoastalregionsfromtheimpactsofstormsandcyclones.Besidesfishandotheraquaticfoods,communitiescollectnon-timberforestproductslikewildfruitsandvegetablesfrommangrovesaswell.Offshoreliebiodiversecoralreefandseagrassbedmarineecosystems,providingcoastalvillageswithanabundantsupplyoffood.16
2.2.4 Watersheds and Freshwater Sources
Burmahasfivemainrivers:theIrrawaddy,theChindwin,theSalween,theSittaung,andtheTenasserim.EndangeredspeciessuchastheIrrawaddydolphinandBlyth’sriverfrogcanbefoundinsomeofthesewaterways. 17OthernotableriversaretheKaladan,whichrunsfromMizoram,India,throughChinlandandArakan;18andtheMekong,whichformstheborderbetweenShanStateandLaoPDR.19RegionalandinternationalinvestorshavetakennoticeofBurma’splentifulwatersources,bothforhydropowerpotentialaswellasirrigatedagriculture. 2.2.5 Oil and Gas
Thefirstforeigninvestmentprojectafter1988whenthegovernmentbegantopartiallyliberalizetheeconomywasthedevelopmentoftheYadanagasfieldintheAndamanSeaandtheconstructionofagaspipelinethroughceasefireandconflictareasinMonStateandTenasserimDivision ineasternBurma.Sincetheendof2004,theBurmeseregimeintensified theopeningofoil andgasblocks to foreigncompanies.Today thereare49onshoreblocksand26offshorebeingexploredand/ordevelopedinBurma.Burma’soilandgassectorisassociatedwithmassivescalehumanrightsabusesandenvironmentaldegradation.
In2007,SoeMyint,theDirector-GeneralofPlanningforBurma’sEnergyMinistry,statedthatthecountryhadmorethan500millionbarrelsofonshoreoilreserves,withanother100millionoffshore.20Thatsameyearnineforeignoilcompanieswereexploringfornewoildeposits,increasingoutputfromolderfields,andattemptingtorestartextractiononpreviouslyshutdownfieldson16onshoreblocks.21AccordingtotheCIAFactbook,Burmahas50millionbarrelsofprovencrudeoilreservesasofthestartof2010,makingitthecountrywiththe50thlargestreservesintheworld.22
Inregardstonaturalgas,accordingtoBritishPetroleum’s2010StatisticalReviewofWorldEnergy,attheendof2009,Burma’sprovengasreservesstoodat20.1trillioncubicfeet,or
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
16
0.57trillioncubicmeters,roughly0.3percentoftheworld’stotalgasreserves.23TheCIAWorldFactbookcitesBurma’sgas reservesatonly283.2billioncubicmetersasof thebeginningof2010,but theactualproven reservesare likelyhigher thancitedbybothsourcesduetorecentonshoregasdiscoveries.24SINOPEC’sBurma-basedjointventurewiththeBurmamilitaryjunta–BurmaPetroleumCo.,Ltd.–reportedthediscoveryof909billioncubicfeetofonshorenaturalgasinPahtolonfieldinCentralBurma.25 26Extensiveexplorationactivitiesarecurrentlytakingplacebothonshoreandoffshore,andtheseundiscoveredreserves,suchastheestimated13trillioncubicfeetofgasintheoffshoreA-2block,aresettopushBurma’sgasreservelevelsevenhigher.27In2009-10naturalgasaccountedfor38%ofBurma’sexportearnings,withallofthegasgoingtoThailand.28
2.2.6 Minerals
Burmahasrichmineralresourcedepositsincludingtungsten,tin,zinc,silver,copper,lead,coal,goal,andindustrialminerals.29Antimony,limestone,andmarbledepositsalsodotthelandscape.30Gemstonesincludingdiamonds,rubies,jade,andsapphirescanalsobefoundinBurma.Burmaismostfamousforitshighqualityrubiesandjadeite(themostexpensiveformofjade).ItishardtotracksmallscalegembusinessesandestimatethevalueofgemtradeinBurma,however,accordingtoindustryestimates,Burmaaccountsformorethan90percentofglobaltradeofrubiesbyvalue.31
3. ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND POLICIES IN BURMA
OVERVIEW
ThoughBurmadoeshavesomelegislationrelatedtoprotectingpeopleandtheenvironment,thecountrylacksthenecessaryadequateadministrativeandlegalstructures,standards,safeguardsandpoliticalwilltoenforcesuchprovisions.Inaddition,whileBurmaispartytoseveralinternationaltreatiessuchastheConventiononBiologicalDiversity(CBD),vBurmahasnotincorporatedtheprovisionscontainedintheseagreementsintodomesticlaw.Forexample,nationallawsdonotcurrentlyrequireenvironmentalimpactassessments(EIA)orpublicparticipationbylocalcommunitiesinthedecision-makingprocessesoflarge-scaledevelopmentprojects. Thereareno laws that comprehensively regulatepollution,nostandards to adequately protect biodiversity, develop resettlementplans, or providecompensation.Thelackofenvironmentalprotectionlegislationhasleftroomforunabatedecologicaldegradation.32Thereare,however,the1995CommunityForestInstructions(CFI),adraftedEnvironmentalLaw,andtheLandAcquisitionActthat,ifsystematicallyenforced,wouldimproveenvironmentalprotectionandtheland-basedrightsoflocalpopulations.
Thissectionreviewstheadministrativeandlegalstructuressetuptoprotecttheenvironment,aswellasongoingactivitiesbythegovernmentandcivilsocietyorganizationsbasedinsideandoutsideBurmathatareintendedtopromotesustainabledevelopmentandenvironmentalprotection.
v BurmabecameapartytotheCBDin1994.Article14(1)(a)oftheConventionrequiresanEIAandArticle8(j)mandatesindigenousparticipationwherethereisasignificantimpactonbiodiversity.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
17
3.1 National Commission for Environmental Affairs
EnvironmentalprotectioninBurmagenerallycomesundertheauthorityoftheNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs(NCEA),formedin1990.viUntil2005,theMinisterofForeignAffairswas thechairofNCEAwhichwasa strong indication that theBurmesegovernmentcreatedtheNCEAmerelyasatooltowininternationalapproval.33In2005,however,theNCEAwastransferredundertheMinistryofForestry(MoF),andtheMinisterofForestryassumedtheroleoftheNCEAchairperson.
ThestatedobjectivesoftheNCEAaretosetenvironmentalstandards,createenvironmentalpoliciesforusingnaturalresources,issuerulesandregulationstocontrolpollution,andtocreateshort-andlong-termenvironmentalpolicieswhichbalanceenvironmentalneedsanddevelopmentrequirements.34However,seriousbudget,staffconstraintsandlackoflegislativemandatehavecompromisedtheeffectivenessof theNCEA inmeetingthoseobjectives.35Thebudgetisminuscule:inthefiscalyear2004-2005,theNCEAhadabudgetofonlyabout$12,000USD(12millionKyat36),andmostofitwasusedtopaysalaries.
TheNCEAhasdraftedtwoenvironmentallaws:theEnvironmentalProtectionLawandtheEnvironmental ImpactAssessmentRules, bothofwhich arepending approval by thegovernment.37
TheNCEAwasalsothefocalpointfortheMyanmarNationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA),areportdoneincollaborationwithseveralinternationalorganizationssuchastheAsianDevelopmentBank(ADB),UnitedNationsEnvironmentalProgramme(UNEP), Institute ofGlobal Environmental Strategies, and theNational Institute forEnvironmental Studiesof Japan. In2006 theMyanmarEPAwaspublishedaspartofabroaderprogramcalledtheNationalPerformanceAssessmentandStrategicEnvironmentFrameworkofGreaterMekongSubregion (GMS),whichaims topromote sustainabledevelopmentintheGMSthroughthecreationofnationalandsub-regionalenvironmentalperformanceassessmentsystemsanddevelopmentofnationalandsub-regionalcapacitiesforimplementingsuchassessments.TheMyanmarEPAprovidessomeusefulbaselinedatacoveringsevenkeyenvironmentalconcerns,includingforestresources,biodiversity,landdegradation,managementofwater resources,wastemanagement, airpollution frommobilesourceandclimatechange. 38However,intheEPAthereisnomentionofthemanyenvironmentalconcernsinBurmasuchasproblemsassociatedwithminetailingsdisposal,constructionoflargedams,large-scalecommercialagriculture,gas-fielddevelopment,orpipelineandroadconstruction.Thereportalsodoesnotmentionthetraditionalnaturalresourcemanagementsystemspracticedbyethnicpeoplethroughoutthecountry.
vi However,respectivedepartmentsthatarestatutorilyseparatefromtheNCEAareresponsibleforacuteenvironmental issues including forest degradation,water resourcemanagement and sustainability ofagriculture.TunMyint,‘EnvironmentalGovernanceintheSPDC’sMyanmar’inMyanmar:Thestate,communityandtheenvironment,TrevorWilsonandMoniqueSkidmore(eds),AustralianNationalUniversity,ANUEPressandAsiaPacificPress,2007.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
18
3.2 Environmental Policies and Laws
AnationalenvironmentalpolicywasdraftedbytheNCEAin1994.TheNationalEnvironmentPolicyisasfollows:
Toestablishsoundenvironmentpolicies,utilisationofwater,land,forests,mineral,marineresourcesandothernaturalresourcesinordertoconservetheenvironmentandpreventitsdegradation,theGovernmentoftheUnionofMyanmarherebyadoptsthefollowingpolicy:Thewealthofthenationisitspeople,itsculturalheritage,itsenvironmentanditsnaturalresources.TheobjectiveofMyanmar’s environmentalpolicy is aimedat achievingharmonyandbalancebetweenthesethroughtheintegrationofenvironmentalconsiderationsintothedevelopmentprocesstoenhancethequalityofthelifeofallitscitizens.Everynationhasthesovereignrighttoutiliseitsnaturalresourcesinaccordancewithitsenvironmentalpolices;butgreatcaremustbetakennottoexceeditsjurisdictionorinfringeupontheinterestsofothernations.ItistheresponsibilityoftheStateandeverycitizentopreserveitsnatural resources in the interests of present and future generations.Environmentalprotectionshouldalwaysbetheprimaryobjectiveinseekingdevelopment39.
There is, however,no formalenvironmental laworan institutional framework for theimplementationof thispolicy.A setofprovisionsaboutenvironmentalprotectionwasdraftedandre-draftedbetween1997and2000bythegovernmentwithtechnicalinputfromanenvironmentallawexpertfundedbyUNEP,40butithasnotbeenmadeintolawyet.Ifthelawisapproved,therewillbemoreinstitutionalspacetoregulateenvironmentalqualityandconductEIA’sandSIA’sforinfrastructureandinvestmentprojectsfundedbythegovernmentandprivatesector.However,lackofpoliticalwill,limitedhumanresources,and low levelsofbudgetallocation forenvironmentalprotectionandconservationaremajorchallengeseveniftheenvironmentallawisinplacetoimplement.
Thedevelopmentoftheenvironmentalpolicywasfollowedbythedraftingof‘MyanmarAgenda21’ in 1997,which followsaUN framework for amulti-prongedapproach tosustainabledevelopment.TheMyanmarAgenda21recognizestheneedforEnvironmentalImpactAssessments.41MyanmarAgenda21callsfor integratedmanagementofnaturalresourcesandprovidesablueprintforachievingsustainabledevelopment.
3.3 Impact Assessments in Burma
Oneofthemostimportantinternationally-acceptedenvironmentalprotectionmethodsistoconductanenvironmentalimpactassessment(EIA)priortoimplementingdevelopmentprojects. Whendoneproperly,anEIA identifies,predicts,evaluates,andmitigates thebiophysical, social,andother relevanteffectsofdevelopmentproposalsprior tomajordecisionsbeingtakenandcommitmentsmade.42TheEIAissupposedtoprovideappropriateopportunitiestoinformandinvolvestakeholdersinaproject.vii
vii TheInternationalAssociationforImpactAssessmenthasguidelinesontheobjectivesandprinciplesofanEIAseehttp://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/Principles%20of%20IA_web.pdf
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
19
InBurma,nolawrequiresanEIAorSocialImpactAssessment(SIA)viii beforeadevelopmentprojectisimplemented.Publicaccesstogovernmentinformationisrestricted,andpriorapprovalfromagenciesisrequiredtoreleaseinformationaboutdevelopmentprojects.43 OngoingdevelopmentprojectsinBurmasuchasconstructionofroadsanddams,mining,logging,aswellascoal,oil,andgasextractiondonothaveanystandardizedmeasureofnegativeimpactstotheenvironmentandthelocalpeople,andtheimplementingagenciesarenotrequiredbythelawsofBurmatomakeeffortstomitigatetheseimpacts.
AnecdotalevidenceshowsthatevenonrareoccasionswhenanEIAisconductedinBurma,itisnotdonetomeetthesubstantiveobjectivesofaproperEIA.ArecentEIA,supportedbyaforeigncompany,wasconductedbyaBurmeseconservationNGOabouttheconstructionofahydropowerdam inBurma,but theNGO refused to includeany social factorsasaccordingtoBurmesegovernmentorders.44TheEIAdidnotimpactthedesignofthedamorstemthetideofhydropowerprojectsinthecountry.
Inarecentarticle,anofficialwiththeMinistryofMinesproposedanEIAprocessforBurma.45 Theproposedprocesshasseveralshortcomings.First,theprocessallowstheMinisterfortheEnvironment (currently a theoreticalpositionas yet there isno suchministry) todetermineatthestart,withoutanysupportingevidence,thataprojectwillhave“no impact.”Whensuchadecision is taken,anEIA isnot required. Thiswouldprovideanobviousloopholeinanyrigorousassessmentofthepotentialenvironmentalandsocialimpactfromaproject. Furthermore,whereas the internationalgoodpractice is fora thirdparty toconduct the assessment study, under this proposal, the project proponent has theresponsibilityforpreparingtheEIA,whichprovidesaneasymechanismtohideorignoresignificantimpacts.Finally,publicparticipationisnotmandatory,andoccurstoolateintheprocess.Itisuptothegovernmenttodetermineifpublicparticipationis“required,”allowingthegovernmenttoavoidpublicparticipationforcontroversialprojects.
Anothertooladvocatedbyhumanrightsandothercivilsocietyorganizations ishumanrightsimpactassessments (HRIAs)toassesstheimpactofgovernmentandotherpoliciesonhumanrights,i.e.health.46
3.4 Environmental Provisions in the 2008 Constitution
Underthenew2008Constitution,thegovernment“shallprotectandconservethenaturalenvironment”(Chapter1,Section45).47Thenationallegislaturecan,butdoesnotneedto,enactlawstoprotecttheenvironmentandhelprestoreareasdegradedordamagedbyminingandforestryactivitiesorthosethathaveexperienceddestructionofplants,wildlife,andhabitat(Chapter4,Section96).48StateandDivisionLegislaturesalsohavethepowertoregulateenvironmentalprotection,butwithintheboundariesoflegislationpassedbytheNationalLegislature(Chapter4,Section196).49Inaddition,everycitizenhastheduty
viii SIAsshouldcover‘allsocialandculturalconsequencestohumanpopulationsofanypublicorprivateactionsthatalterthewaysinwhichpeoplelive,work,play,relatetooneanother,organizetomeettheirneeds,andgenerallycopeasmembersofsociety’and‘culturalimpactsinvolvechangestothenorms,values,andbeliefsof individuals thatguideandrationalize theircognitionof themselvesandtheirsocieties’R.J.BurdgeandF.Vanclay,F.,‘Socialimpactassessment:acontributiontothestateoftheartseries’,ImpactAssessment,1996.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
20
to“assist”thegovernmentincarryingoutenvironmentalconservation(Chapter8,Section390).50
Withregardtoenvironmentalprotection,the2008Constitutiondoesnotguaranteetothepeople the right to a clean andhealthy environment althoughmanyother nationalconstitutionsprovidesucharight.ixTheconstitutiondoesnothaveanyclearlanguageonsustainabledevelopmentandrecognitionoftherightsofcivilsocietysuchasfreedomofinformation,participation innaturalresourcemanagement,customary landownership,informationinlocallanguages,andequitablebenefitsharing.
3.5 National Sustainable Development Strategy
TheNationalSustainableDevelopmentStrategy(NSDS)ispartofabroaderprogramoftheUNSustainableDevelopmentCommissionsetupaftertheWorldSummitonSustainableDevelopmentin2002.EverycountryincludingBurmathatsignedAgenda21xattheEarthSummit inRioDe Janerio in1992,agreed todevelopanNSDSby2010 in linewith theMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDGs).UNEPprovidedfundingforBurmatodevelopanNSDS.Themainaimof theprocesswas todevelopanNSDS in linewith internationalstandardsbymeetingtheMDGsandensurethatenvironmentalandsocial impactsaremitigatedwhenimplementingdevelopmentprojects. 51TheNCEAinBurmatookaleadindevelopingthestrategyinconsultationwiththegovernmentandasmallnumberofNGOs.Burma’sNSDSwaspublishedinAugust2009.Thethreegoalsaresustainablemanagementofnaturalresources,integratedeconomicdevelopmentandsustainablesocialdevelopment.Specific strategiesareoutlinedundereachgoal. Forexample, thegoal for SustainableManagementofNaturalResourcessuggestsstrategiesforforestresourcemanagement,sustainableenergyproductionandconsumption,biodiversity conservation, sustainablefreshwaterresourcesmanagement,sustainablemanagementoflandresources,sustainablemanagementformineralresourcesutilization,andsoon.52
TheNSDSwasofficiallyacceptedbytheMinistryofPlanning. In theory, it isaguidingdocumentforgovernmentministries,departmentsandlocalauthorities,UNorganizations,and international and localNGOs. Themain limitation, however, is thatBurma lackscomprehensivenationalpolicieson landuse,energyandenvironment,whichmakes itdifficulttoimplementthestrategiescontainedintheNSDS.ThereisalsoaneedtoconsultmoreNGOsintheprocess.TheUnitedNationsEnvironmentProgramhasstatedthatthereareopportunitiestoreviewandfurtherdevelopthestrategyinthefuture.53
ix ForexamplethePhilippines’Constitutionprovides:“TheStateshallprotectandadvancetherightofthepeopletoabalancedandhealthfulecologyinaccordwiththerhythmandharmonyofnature”http://www.tanggol.org/environmental_laws/conex.html.x Agenda21“isacomprehensiveplanofactiontobetakenglobally,nationallyandlocallybyorganizationsoftheUnitedNationsSystem,Governments,andMajorGroupsineveryareainwhichhumanimpactsontheenvironment.Agenda21..wasadoptedbymorethan178GovernmentsattheUnitedNationsConferenceonEnvironmentandDevelopment(UNCED)heldinRiodeJanerio,Brazil,3to14June1992”.http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
21
3.6 International Commitments
Burmahassigned31internationaltreatiesrelatedtotheenvironment(seeTable1).Itisunclear,however,howthecontentsofthosetreatieshavebeenincorporatedintodomesticlaw.Belowisamorein-depthdiscussionofthemostsignificantconventionsinthecontextofenvironmentalprotectioninBurmatoday.
Table 1–InternationalandregionaltreatiesconcerningtheenvironmenttowhichBurmaisaparty(inchronologicalorder)
Name
1 PlantProtectionAgreementfortheSoutheastAsiaandPacificRegion
2 TreatyBanningNuclearWeaponsTestsintheAtmosphereinOuterSpaceandUnderWater
3 OuterSpaceTreaty:TreatyonPrinciplesGoverningtheActivitiesofStatesintheExploitationandUseofOuterSpaceincludingtheMoonandotherCelestialBodies
4 TreatyontheProhibitionoftheEmplacementofNuclearWeaponsandotherWeaponsofMassDestructionontheSea-BedandOceanFloorandintheSubsoilthereof(SeabedTreaty)
5 ConventionontheProhibitionoftheDevelopment,ProductionandStockpilingofBacteriologicalandToxinWeapons,andtheirDestruction
6 ViennaConventionfortheProtectionoftheOzoneLayer
7 MontrealProtocolonSubstancesthatDepletetheOzoneLayer
8 MARPOL:InternationalConventionforthePreventionofPollutionfromShips
9 MARPOL:InternationalConventionforthePreventionofPollutionfromShipsasamended1978
10 AgreementontheNetworksofAquacultureCentersinAsiaandthePacificRegion
11 LondonAmendmenttotheMontrealProtocolonSubstancesthatDepletetheOzoneLayer
12 UnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange(UNFCCC)
13 TreatyontheNon-ProliferationofNuclearWeapons
14 ICAO:ANNEX16AnnextotheConventiononInternationalCivilAviationEnvironmentalProtectionVol.I,II,AircraftNoise
15 UnitedNationsConventiontoCombatDesertification
16 ViennaConventionfortheProtectionofOzoneLayer
17 MontrealProtocolonSubstancesthatDepletetheOzoneLayer
18 LondonAmendmenttotheMontrealProtocol
19 ConventionConcerningtheProtectionoftheWorldCulturalandNaturalHeritage
20 ConventiononBiologicalDiversity(CBD)
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
22
Name
21 UnitedNationsConventionontheLawoftheSea
22 InternationalTropicalTimberAgreement(ITTA)
23 ConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWildFaunaandFlora(CITES)
24 ASEANAgreementontheConservationofNatureandNaturalResources
25 CatagenaProtocolonBiosafety
26 ASEANAgreementonTransboundaryHazePollution
27 Kyoto ProtocoltotheUnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange
28 ConventionontheProhibitionoftheDevelopment,Production,andStockpilingandUseofChemicalWeaponsandontheirDestruction
29 StockholmConventiononPersistentOrganicPollutants
30 RamsarConventiononWetlands
31 CopenhagenAmendmenttoMontrealProtocolonSubstancesthatdepletetheOzoneLayer
3.6.1 Biodiversity Conservation and Indigenous Peoples
Convention on Biological Diversity
BurmaratifiedtheConventiononBiologicalDiversity(CBD)in1994.Itisthefirstglobalagreementonconservationandsustainableuseofbiologicaldiversity.54AsignificantarticleforindigenouspeopleisArticle8jwhichstates,“Signatoriesmustrespect,preserve,andpromoteindigenousknowledge,innovations,andpracticesrelevantfortheconservationandsustainableuseofbiologicaldiversity.”55 xi
DespitepoliticalconstraintstheBurmesegovernmenthasfollowed-upontheCBD.Thegovernmentwroteall three requirednationalbiodiversity reports. In January2006aMemorandumofUnderstanding(MoU)wassignedwiththeUnitedNationsEnvironmentProgramRegionalOfficeofAsia-Pacific(UNEPROAP)inBangkokforittosupportBurma’sNCEAwiththedevelopmentoftheNationalBiodiversityStrategyActionPlan(NBSAP).56 TheNBSAPispartofarequirementoftheCBDforsignatoriestointegrateconservationandsustainableuseofbiologicalresourcesintonationaldecisionmaking,andmainstreamissuesacrossallsectorsofthenationaleconomyandpolicy-makingframework(Articles6(b),26and10(a)).xii
xi IntheCBDpartiesarealsocalledontoestablishprotectedareaswherespecialmeasuresneedtobetakento conservebiological diversity. The conventionprovides that importantbiological resources shouldbemanaged “whetherwithinoroutsideprotectedareas,with a view toensuring their conservationandsustainableuse”(Article8c).xiTheCBDalso“protect(s)andencourage(s)customaryuseofbiologicalresourcesinaccordancewithtraditionalculturalpracticesthatarecompatiblewithconservationorsustainableuserequirements”(Article10c).xii Article6createsanobligationfornationalbiodiversityplanning.Itstatesthatsignatoriesshould“developnationalstrategies,plansorprogrammesfortheconservationandsustainableuseofbiologicaldiversityor
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
23
AconsultationworkshoptostarttheNBSAPprocesswasorganizedbytheForestDepartmentin June2006 inRangoon. Inperhaps the largestgathering inBurmaever regardinganenvironmental issue, out of 149 invitees, therewere 119participants fromover 44organizations,governmentministriesanddepartments,universitiesandinstitutesaswellasrepresentativesofinternationalandnationalNGOsandtheprivatesector.57
Atthemeetingitwasdeclaredthatthereport“InvestmentOpportunitiesforBiodiversityConservationinMyanmar,”publishedin2005byBirdlifeInternational,UNDP-BurmaandCriticalEcosystemsPartnershipFund(CEPF),wouldbeusedasabaselinedocumentfortheNBSAPprocess.Thereportoutlineskeybiodiversityareas,alistofthreatenedspecies,andconservationcorridors,aswellasidentifiesprioritiesforconservationinvestmentforthenextfiveyears.The report,however, isentirelybasedon thebiophysical sciencesandtechnicalexpertisewithoutanyregardforsocialandculturalvalue,indigenousterritories,orthepoliticalethnicconflictrootedinBurma. 58
Burmahasreceivedfundingforthe“stocktakingprocess”intheformulationoftheNBSAPfromtheGlobalEnvironmentFund(GEF),butduetopersonnelchangesintheForestryDepartmentandthelackofaqualifiedresourceperson,theprocessisnotgoingasfastasGEFandUNEPhoped. 59AconsultantfortheNBSAPhashoweverbeenappointedfromthenationalNGOECODEV(seesection3.7.1).
Moreover,Burma’sNBSAPprocess itself thus farhasmarginalized indigenouspeople’scontributiontobiodiversityconservation.NoindigenouspeoplesorenvironmentalgroupswithindigenousrepresentationinsideorbasedoutsideofBurmahavebeenconsultedintheprocessofdevelopingtheNBSAP.ThisisindirectcontradictiontotheprinciplesoftheCBD,theNBSAPguidelinesandGEFmandates.60
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Burmawasoneof144statesthatendorsedtheUnitedNationsDeclarationontheRightsofIndigenousPeoplesinSeptember2007.EffectiveimplementationofthishumanrightsinstrumentwouldsignificantlyimprovethesituationforindigenouspeopleinBurmaandthroughout theworld.61Article32 is about IndigenousPeoples right toFreeandPriorInformedConsent (FPIC): “States shall consult and cooperate in good faithwith theIndigenousPeoplesconcernedthroughtheirownrepresentativeinstitutionsinordertoobtainFreeandPriorInformedConsentpriortoapprovalofanyprojectaffectingtheirlandorterritories”.Article10aboutforciblerelocationofindigenouspeople,andtheneedforFPICandArticle26aboutlandrightsarealsorelevantarticlesforindigenouspeoplesinBurma.xiiiWhileitisapplaudedthattheBurmesegovernmentsignedthistreaty,itistime
adaptforthispurposeexistingstrategies,plansorprogrammeswhichshallreflect,interalia,themeasuressetoutinthisConventionrelevanttotheContractingPartyconcerned”and“integrate,asfaraspossibleandasappropriate,theconservationandsustainableuseofbiologicaldiversityintorelevantsectoralorcross-sectoralplans,programmesandpolicies”.Articles26and10(a)arealsorelevantcallingforregularnationalreportsandtheintegrationofconservationandbiologicalresourcesintonationaldecisionmaking.xiii “Indigenouspeoplesshallnotbeforciblyremovedfromtheirlandsorterritories.Norelocationshalltakeplacewithoutthefree,priorandinformedconsentoftheindigenouspeoplesconcernedandafteragreementonjustandfaircompensationand,wherepossible,withtheoptionofreturn”(Article10),“1.Indigenouspeopleshavetherighttothelands,territoriesandresourceswhichtheyhavetraditionallyowned,occupied
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
24
thegovernmentstarttorespectandfollowtheindigenousprotectionregimesadvocatedinthistreaty,whichisdesperatelyneededinBurma.Thisagreementisonestepforwardinrecognizingtherightsandresponsibilitiesofindigenouspeoplesandthepositiveroletheycan–andshould–playinprotectingtheenvironment,andwithit,theirresource-basedlivelihoods.
International Labor Organization
TheILOConvention169alsorecognizestherightsofownershipandpossessionofpeoplestraditionallyoccupyingland(Article14),whiletherightstonaturalresources–includingparticipation in theiruse,managementandconservation–are ‘specially safeguarded’(Article15).62
3.6.2 CITES
BurmaisasignatorytotheConventiononInternationalTradeinEndangeredSpeciesofWild FaunaandFlora (CITES). CITES signatories, includingBurma,agree to regulateorprohibittradeinendangeredspeciesoranimalpartssuchasbones,horns,orfur,accordingtothespecies’levelofendangermentlistedintheappendicesofCITES.xiv InBurma,theForestdepartmentservesastheCITESmanagementauthority.In1994theProtectionofWildlifeandWildPlantsandConservationofNaturalAreas Law (State LawandOrderRestorationCouncilLawNo.583/94.1994)wasenacted.ThelawissupposedtobeenforcedbytheForestrydepartment,andpossession,saleorexportofanimalsortheirpartsofspeciescoveredbythislawispunishablebyafineofupto50000Kyat($7680USD)and/orimprisonmentofuptosevenyears.63Thereis,however,littleornoenforcementofCITESregulationsinBurma.EndangeredspeciescanbefoundinmarketsthroughoutBurma,withmuchofthedemandcomingfromChina,andmorerecentlyVietnam.64 65(Seesection5.7).
3.6.3 Climate Change
BurmahasbeenreceivingfundsfromGEFtoimplementtwoprojects:aProjectforInitialNationalCommunication(INC)underUNFCCCandaNationalActionPlanforAdaptation(NAPA).TheINCistoimplementArticle6oftheUNFCCCxv.ThecurrentINCproject isastocktakingexercise for analyzing levels of greenhouse gas emission, climate changescenarios,associatedrisksandvulnerabilities,potentialmeasuresandtechnologytransferformitigatingclimatechangeandthedegreeofpublicawarenessonclimatechangeissues.NAPAisaprocessundertheUnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange(UNFCCC)forLeastDevelopedCountriessuchasBurmato“toidentifypriorityactivities
orotherwiseusedoracquired.2.Indigenouspeopleshavetherighttoown,use,developandcontrolthelands,territoriesandresourcesthattheypossessbyreasonoftraditionalownershiporothertraditionaloccupationoruse,aswellasthosewhichtheyhaveotherwiseacquired.3.Statesshallgivelegalrecognitionandprotectiontotheselands,territoriesandresources.Suchrecognitionshallbeconductedwithduerespecttothecustoms,traditionsandlandtenuresystemsoftheindigenouspeoplesconcerned.”(Article26).Forfulltextseehttp://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html.xiv TherearethreeappendicestoCITESthatarelistsofspeciestoberegulated.xv Article6 is foreducation, trainingandpublicawareness. Seehttp://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/1366.php
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
25
thatrespondtotheirurgentandimmediateneedstoadapttoclimatechange–thoseforwhichfurtherdelaywouldincreasevulnerabilityand/orcostsatalaterstage”. 66TheNAPAprojectinBurmaisfocusingonpreparingnationalsectoralandmultisectoralactivitiestobuildadaptivecapacitiesatnationalandlocallevelforfacingclimatechangerisks.Burmaisearmarkedforfundingofapproximately$US16millionunderGEF’s2010to2014programcycle (namelyGEF5’s SystemofTransparentAllocationofResources (STAR)).However,Burma’saccesstofundsfromGEF5isconfinedbytheneedinco-fundingupto40to60%ofthetotalbudgetwhichislimitedbyWesternsanctionspolicies.Nevertheless,attemptshavebeenmadeinsideBurmaforformationofnewauthorityfocusingonclimatechangeandenvironmentalmatters,includingenvironmentalactivitieslinkedwithglobalmovementsandinitiatives.Atpresent,ECODEVisalsoservingasteamleaderoftheGEFfundedprojectfornationalcommunicationunderUnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChangeinordertoimplementtheArticle6oftheconventionwhichistopromoteeducation,trainingandpublicawarenessonclimatechange,andtheexecutivedirectoristhenationalconsultantfortheNationalStrategyandActionPlanonBiodiversityconservation(NBSAP).
In2010theBurmesegovernmentexpressed interest inaUNcollaborative initiativeonReducingEmissionsfromDeforestationandForestDegradation(REDD),nowreferredtoasREDD+.xvi 67However,itwasmutuallyagreedthatduetoconcernsoverthepossibilityofoppositionfromsomemembersoftheUN-REDDPolicyBoard,theywouldnotformallyproceedwith an application to join at this time.UN-REDD is currently supportingrepresentativesfromcivilsocietyorganizationsfromBurmatoattendtrainingsinREDD“Readiness”suchasatraininginfreeandpriorinformedconsentinVietnam.InNovember2010,twoMinistryofForestryofficialsandaUNDPofficialattendedaworkshopforregionalactorsinBangkok.TheworkshopservedtoexchangelessonslearnedandexperiencesinpreparingforREDD+.
3.7 Environmentalism in Burma
Note: Many groups and individuals inside are actively working on a range of environmental and livelihood-based issues inside Burma. Their work and safety could be jeopardized by being identified, so only groups with a high public profile or websites will be mentioned. For others, their work will be discussed without identifying their organization.
Indiscussingtheactivitiesoforganizationsworkingonenvironmentalandlivelihood-basedissuesbothbasedingovernment-controlledareasofBurma(‘inside’)andthosebasedintheThai andChineseborder regions (‘bordergroups’), thereare twoapproaches: the‘traditional’conservationapproachandtherights-basedapproach.Organizationsthatareusingarights-basedapproachworkfromaperspectiveofsustainabledevelopmentandlivelihoodsandsubsequentlyfocusonissuessuchasfoodsecurity,landtenureandrights,andcommunitydevelopmentandorganizing.Conservationorganizations tend to focusspecificallyonenvironmentalprotection,althoughwithvaryingapproachestoachievetheir
xvi “ReducingEmissionsfromDeforestationandForestDegradation(REDD)isanefforttocreateafinancialvalueforthecarbonstoredinforests,offeringincentivesfordevelopingcountriestoreduceemissionsfromforestedlandsandinvestinlow-carbonpathstosustainabledevelopment.“REDD+”goesbeyonddeforestationand forestdegradation, and includes the roleof conservation, sustainablemanagementof forests andenhancementofforestcarbonstocks”.Seehttp://www.un-redd.org/AboutREDD/tabid/582/Default.aspx
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
26
commongoal.Organizationsworkingonenvironmentalissuesalsofocusonenvironmentalawareness,educationandtraining,policydevelopment,advocacyandnetworking.
3.7.1 Organizations based inside Burma
Thespaceforengagingonenvironmentalissues–broadlydefined–inBurmahasopenedupconsiderablyoverthepastdecade,withagrowingnumberofinternational,nationalandgrassrootsorganizationsnowoperating indifferentpartsof thecountryonawiderangeof relatedprojects.Abroadarrayoforganizationsareworkingonwhat canbeconsidered”environment”issues,suchasconservation,livelihooddevelopment,agriculturalcommoditychains,farmer-to-farmerschools,smallholderplantationdevelopment, landtenureandfoodsecurity,communityforestry,andforestrestorationthroughoutgovernment-controlledareasinBurma,andinafewcases,areascontrolledbyethnicpoliticalgroups.Therearecurrentlyapproximately40internationalNGOsworkingon“environmentissues”throughoutthecountryincludingagriculture,horticulture,fisheries,incomegeneration,integratedfarmingsystems,agro-forestry,foodsecurity,wildlifeconservation,biodiversityconservation,environmentaleducationandwaterandsanitationinitiatives.68Thisnumberdoesnotincludetheextensivenumberofchurches,community-basedorganizations(CBO),andnationalandgrassrootsorganizationsworkingontheseissues.
Burmeseenvironmentalorganizationshavebeenimplementing“environmental”activitiesatlocalandnationallevelsforuptoadecadenow,usingbothtraditionalconservationapproachesaswellasrights-basedapproaches.Onesuchorganization,ForestResourceEnvironmentDevelopmentandConservationAssociation(FREDA),isofficiallyregisteredwiththegovernmenttoimplementanextensiveprogramonforestconservationandrestoration,gainingprominenceovertheyearstobecomethecountry’smostrecognizedconservationNGO.FREDAemploysa traditional conservationmodelbutwith increasinglycommunity-orientedapproaches.FREDA focusesmostlyoncommunity reforestation,especiallymangroves,andagro-andaqua-forestryintheIrrawaddydelta.FREDAhasworkswiththeFDoninternationalsustainableforestryinitiatives,aswellastimbercertificationmechanismsforthecountry.RecentlyFREDAhasbeeninvolvedinanEnvironmentSteeringCommitteewiththegovernment,UNDPandUNEPtosupportlocalinitiativesaroundInleLakewherethereisagrowingawarenessoftheeffectofchemicalfertilizers,pesticidesandherbicidesonlivelihoodsandlocalecosystems.69
BANCA,aBurmeseconservationNGO,wasestablishedinRangooninmid-2000sasalocalpartnerforBirdlifeInternationaltoaddressbirdandhabitatconservationinBurma.BANCAhasinitiatedmanyconservationprojectsindifferentpartsofthecountry,aswellasconductedextensivein-depthecologicalresearchwithateamofBurmesescientistsinareasrichinbiodiversitytoidentifycriticalhabitatforprotection.
SeveralotherBurmeseNGOsoperateinthecountrywithheadofficesinRangoon,mostlyworkingonforestconservationandrestoration.Mostofthemareheadedbyformerhigh-levelforestryofficials,anduseamoretraditionalconservationapproachbutincreasinglywithcommunity-basedapproaches.TheseorganizationsfocusonmangrovereforestationinthedeltaregionafterCycloneNargisstruckin2008,greeningtheCentralDryZone,andcommunityforestryinitiativesthroughoutthecountry.ManyBurmeseNGOsfocustheireffortsonlocallivelihoodsandcommunityempowerment.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
27
“ECODEVwhichstandsfor‘economicallyprogressiveecosystemdevelopment’isagroupofMyanmardevelopmentprofessionals, intellectuals and social entrepreneurs”.70 It isregisteredundertheMyanmarPartnershipActandtheMyanmarCompanyAct.ThemissionofECODEV is tonetwork forprivatepublicpartnerships inorder torealize itsvisionof“PrivateSectorLedSustainableDevelopment”inBurmaandbeyond.Allofitsdevelopmentprograms focus onnurturing “Healthier Environment” by a “Stronger Society”with“ResponsibleBusinessInvestment”through“StrategicPartnershipDevelopment”.AspartofitsattempttopromoteenvironmentalgovernanceinMyanmar,ECODEVhasundertakennumberofinitiativeswhichincludethedevelopmentoftheprocessoftheEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessmentareportcommissionedbyUNEPtheADB,publishedin2006(seesection3.1), theempowermentof grassroots communities to secure land tenureandresource-use rightsof communities through community forestry, andevidencebasedresearchforeffectiveadvocacy.ECODEVtakeskeypositionsincivilsocietynetworksincludingtheFoodSecurityWorkingGroup,MangroveEnvironmentandRehabilitationNetworkandKachinStateConservationGroup.Atpresent,ECODEVisalsoservingasteamleaderfortheINCproject(seesection3.6.3),andtheexecutivedirectoristhenationalconsultantfortheNBSAP(seesection3.6.1).
TheMetta Development Foundation (Metta) is an NGO established in 1998 toassist communities recovering from the devastating consequences of conflict andhumanitarianemergency.Mettaworksin10statesandregionsonawiderangeofprojectsaimedtoenhance landtenure and foodsecurity,facilitatefarmer-to-farmer fieldschools,encouragetheestablishmentofcommunityforests,andothersustainablecommunity-basedprojects.Metta basesitsworkonacommunityempowermentmodelbyworkingcloselywithcommunitiesoveralongterm,gainingthemrespectfromtheircolleagues.
ShalomFoundation(Nyein)wasestablishedin2000initiatedbyKachinreligiousleaderandinvolvedby religiousandcivil society leaders fromvariousethnic statesand thewiderBurmesecommunity.ItaimstoworkonpeaceanddevelopmentinitiativesinKachinStateafterthecease-fireprocess,whichhasnowevolvedintofacilitatinglivelihooddevelopmentprojectssuchascommunityforestry,community-basedresearch,peace-buildingtrainings,andconstructivedialogueamongstdifferentparties. Shalomworks closelywithKachincommunities, and thewider community on issuespertaining topeace, conflict, andsustainabledevelopment.
BesidesBurmeseconservationand livelihooddevelopmentNGOs, therearealsomanyinternationalNGOsworkingonsimilarissues,withheadofficesinRangoonandinsomecasesbranchofficesinprovincialcapitalsinstates/divisionswheretheyoperateprojects.Mostoftheseorganizationsworkfromarights-basedapproach.SomeofthemoreactiveorganizationsincludeWorldConcern,GRET,DeutscheWelthungerHilfe(DWHH,formerlyGermanAgroActionorGAA),AdventistDevelopmentandReliefAgency(ADRA),SwissAid,SavetheChildren,Oxfam(GB),CARE,MercyCorps,DanishChurchAid(DCA),ConsortiumofDutchNGOs (CDN),Action contra la faim (ACF) andActionAid.While theyoperatedifferentlyand invest their resources indifferentprojectsacross thecountry (althoughmostlyinethnicareasandtheIrrawaddydeltaafterCycloneNargis),theyallseemtoshareacommongoal:improvinglocallivelihoods.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
28
Althoughtoalesserextent,someinternationalNGOswithofficesinRangoonworkfromamoretraditionalconservationapproach,mostprominentlyWildlifeConservationSociety(WCS)whichisresponsibleforsettingupseveralprotectedareasinthecountry,thebest-knownbeingtheHugawngValleyTigerReserveinKachinState.Somesmallerinternationalconservationorganizationsalsooperateafewprojectsinthecountry,butwithoutofficesinRangoon.
As a reflectionof growing strength andpopularity, environmental organizations areincreasinglycomingtogetherasnetworkstofosterinter-organizationalcooperationandsolidarity.TheFoodSecurityWorkingGroup(FSWG)isonesuchnetworkthatsince2003hasbrought togetherBurmeseand internationalorganizations thatworkon livelihooddevelopmentprojectsthatdirectlyrelatetofoodsecurityissuesinBurma.Theyworkoncollaborativeresearchprojectssuchasgenderandagriculture,uplandlandtenure,farmer-ledagriculture trainings, and community forestry. In2010FSWGpublishedabriefingdocumentontheuplandlandtenuresecuritysituationintheuplandsofBurma,whichbroughttogetheradiversecollectionofpeoplefromprivate,non-profit,andgovernmentsectorstodiscussuplandfoodinsecurityandlandtenurereform.
AfterNargis anewnetwork calledMangroveEnvironmentResearchNetwork (MERN)composedof17 localNGOswas formed to co-ordinate theseeffortswitha focusonaquaforestry.Thenetworkfocusesonconservationandlivelihoodimprovementinitiatives.Activities includereforestation,awareness to farmersandfishermanaboutoveruseofchemicals,biodiversityconservation,localorganizationaldevelopment,andalliancebuildingwithotherkeystakeholdersforlocaleconomicdevelopmentinitiatives.
InadditiontotheseestablishedBurmeseorganizations,ahandfulofdedicatedBurmese(and toa lesserextent foreign)environmentalists and socialworkers collaboratewithBurmeseorganizations,usingtheirexpertiseandconnectionstohelpimplementprojects,eitheraspaidconsultantsorvolunteers.TherearealsoindividualsandteamsofBurmese(andsomeforeign)researchersworkingwithorganizationstoconductsurveysandinterviewstoquantifyandqualifyecologicalandlivelihooddegradationinthecountry,withoutwhoseworkNGOsinBurmaandtheinternationalcommunitywouldnotunderstandaswellthestateoftheenvironmentinthecountry.Finallyitisimportanttorecognizethecommitmentfromreligiousorganizationsandindividuals(BuddhistSanghaandmonksaswellasChristianchurchesandpastors)thataddressenvironmentalissuesintheirlocalcommunities.Eitherthroughexplaininghow the religionholds theearthandall its life sacredor throughmobilizingthecommunitytocarryoutenvironment-relatedprojectsintheirarea,religionplaysanimportantyetoftenneglectedaspectofenvironmentalisminBurmatoday.
WhilemostoftheseorganizationsdoadministrativeworkfromtheirmainofficeinRangoonandimplementprojectsfromtheirprovincialofficesingovernment-controlledterritories,afeworganizationsalsoprovidelocalreliefandcommunitydevelopmentinnon-governmentcontrolledborderterritories.TheseorganizationsareeitherbasedinBurmaontheChinaborder,orasisthecaseforone,basedinKunmingwithaccesstoBurmabordercommunities,orimplementprojectsontheborderfromtheirprovincialoffices.However,mostoftheworkforcommunitiescaughtinthecrossfirefromdecadesofon-goingwarandconflictisaddressedbygroupsbasedinThailand(seesection3.7.3).
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
29
3.7.2 UN Interventions on Environmental Protection
UNDPhasbeenworkinginBurmasince1994.Theycurrentlyworkin60townshipsacrossthe country. UNDP’s initiatives “target themost vulnerable communitiesandwork toimproveopportunities for sustainable livelihoods”71 inareasof “food security,primaryhealthcare,environment,HIV/AIDS,andtrainingandeducation”.72
AlthoughUNEPdoesnothaveanofficeinRangoon,theydocollaborateonvariousUN-Burmaprojectsthatfallwithinitsmandate.Theyarealsobecomingmoreactiveinthecountryandare looking toemployapart-timestaffbasedat theUNHABITAToffice inRangoon in2011.73Asmentioned, its activities in thepast include involvement in theEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment,NationalBiodiversityStrategyActionPlan(NBSAP),providing funding for an environmental lawexpert to draft the Environmental Law,participatinginformulatingtheNationalSustainableDevelopmentStrategyandtheInleLakeInitiative(withFREDA).Inaddition,UNEPisworkingwiththeWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)onanOzoneDepletionProjectinRangoonwhichassessesthelevelofcontaminantsintheairtoidentifysourcesandtakemeasurestopreventairpollutionsuchasencouragingthedecreaseintheamountofleadedpetrolusedincars.74 75
Burma’s governmenthas also expressed interest in theUnitedNationsCollaborativeProgrammeonReducingEmissionsfromDeforestationandForestDegradationinDevelopingCountries(UNREDD)program,mentionedabove.xvii 76
3.7.3 Ethnic Environmental Organizations based in Thailand
EnvironmentalgroupsbasedontheThailand-Burmaborderworkinalltheethnicstates.Amajorfocusistoincreasetherecognitionofrightsoflocalandindigenouspeoplestouseandmanagetheirnaturalresourcesforsustainabledevelopment,topromoteenvironmentalprotectionandhumanrightsthroughadvocacyaboutlarge-scaledevelopmentandnaturalresourceextractionprojects,andcorporateandgovernmentaccountability.Thesegroupsworkprimarilyinareasundercontrolofethnicarmiesandinceasefireareas.Notallgroupsworkoneveryaspect,asummaryofactivitiesisexplainedbelow.ShortbriefsaboutindividualBEWGmembersareincludedatthebeginningofthereport.
ThissectionincludestheworkofArakanOilWatch(AOW),ArakanRiversNetwork(ARN),BridgingRuralIntegratedDevelopmentandGrassrootsEmpowerment(BRIDGE),BurmaRiversNetwork (BRN), Ethnic CommunityDevelopment Forum (ECDF), Earth RightsInternational (ERI),KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG),KarenniEvergreen,KarenEnvironmentCommittee (KEC),KarenEnvironmental andSocialActionNetwork(KESAN),LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization(LNDO),NetworkforEnvironmentalandEconomicDevelopment(NEED),Pa’OhYouthOrganization(PYO),ShanSapawaEnvironmentalOrganizationand theShweGasMovement. ThosewhicharemembersofBEWGhaveorganizational descriptions at the beginning of the report under ‘About the BurmaEnvironmentalWorkingGroup’.
xvii Seefootnotexv.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
30
Community Development
EmpowermentofcommunitiesinsideBurmatoconservenaturalresourcesandimprovelivelihoodsecurityandsustainabilityforcurrentandfuturegenerationsisthecentralfocusinanumberofborder-basedgroups’activities.Arightsbasedapproachisusedtoempowercommunitiesand local leadersonenvironment conservationand socialdevelopment.Projectsincludetheestablishmentandprotectionofcommunityforests,supportforlocally-producedtraditionalmedicines,community-basedfoodandwatersecurityinitiativesthatsupport local foodproductionandclimatechangeadaptationmechanisms, formalandinformalenvironmentaleducation,andHIV-AIDSeducationandsurveys.Youthdevelopmentis seenasespecially importantbymanygroupsand ispursued through internshipandeducationopportunities inwithin theseorganizations,youth forumsexploring subjectssuchastheresourcecurse,andnetwork-buildingacrossethnicities, issuesandregions.Groupsareincreasinglydesigningcommunitydevelopmentinitiativesthataddressgenderinequalityandamplifywomen’svoicesandroles.
Figure 1 Community forest awareness training, Khoe Kay, Salween River, Karen state. Karen youth learning indigenous knowledge on community forest conservation. KESAN 2009.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
31
Environmental Education
Environmental groups based on the Thailand-Burmaborder provide education andcommunityawarenessandcapacityonarangeofenvironmentalissues.Educationthemesincludebiodiversity,landtenure,environmentalconservation,climatechange,traditionalagricultureandmedicines,alternativeenergies,organic farming,environmental impactassessment,goodenvironmentalgovernance,resourcedocumentation,informedconsent,revenuetransparencyandsustainabledevelopment.Educationmethodsincludetrainingthroughyouthforums,workshops,internshipsandestablishedenvironmentalschoolsbothwithinandoutsideBurma’sborders.More informal informationdisseminationoccursthrough traditional communitynetworking, traveling storytellers andvideo,audioandprintedmediaproducedinlocallanguages.SomegroupsactivelyfosterlocalethniclanguageswhichhavebeenbannedintheBurmeseeducationalsystem,asacentralmeanstoachievingenvironmentaleducation.
Policy Development
PolicydevelopmentisnotjustataskforthecurrentgovernmentorthegovernmentofafuturedemocraticBurma,but for regional and international frameworks, internationalfinancialinstitutionsandgovernments,andbusinessesandcorporationsoperatinginsideBurma.Groupsworkwith local and regional civil society organizations to articulateenvironmentalandsocialandeconomicdevelopmentconcernsandformulateenvironmentalpoliciesforpolicymakersinexile,thecurrentgovernment,companies,andnon-stateactors.Border-basedenvironmentalgroupswidelyrecognizetheneedtostrengthencommunityinitiativesthroughdevelopmentofpolicyandidentificationofdevelopmentprioritieswithlocalstakeholdersinethnicareas.
Advocacy
ThereisnofreedomofspeechinBurma,makingitdifficultfororganizationsbasedinsideBurma to publicly exposenegative environmental and social impacts of large scale-developmentactivities suchas the constructionof large-scaledams,mining, resourceconcessions, andoil andgasextraction.Border-basedenvironmental groups thereforeconductresearchanddoadvocacyontheseissuesbecausetheyareabletoworkinasaferenvironment.Inadditiontolarge-scaleinfrastructuredevelopmentprojects,theyadvocateaboutcommunitydevelopment,environmentaleducationandpolicydevelopmentinitiativesinlocal,regional,nationalandinternationalarenas,buildingalliancesandworkingwithothercivilsocietyorganizations.Theypublicizetheirresearchandadvocacythroughmanyreportsdocumentingsuchabuses.Groupsnetworkwithnational,regionalandinternationalorganizationsonissuesrangingfromrevenuetransparencytoindigenouspeople’srights,riversandbiodiversity,mega-developmentprojects,andInternationalFinancialInstitutions.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
32
4. LAW AND POLICY ON FORESTRY AND AGRICULTURAL LAND
4.1 Forestry Laws and Policies
4.1.1 Ministry of Forestry
TheMinistryofForestry(MoF)isresponsibleforforestlandmanagement,environmentalprotection,timberextractionandforestpolicyinBurma–followingtheForestPolicy1995.Thetoppositions,includingtheministerandnowoftentimedirectorgenerals(DGs),arestaffedbymilitaryofficialswithnotechnicaltrainingorknowledge,whilethedepartmentsundertheministryaremadeupoftrainedforestersandotherprofessionals.FivedepartmentscomeunderthecontroloftheMoF:theForestDepartment(FD)withitsNatureandWildlifeConservationDivision;theMyanmarTimberEnterprise(MTE),the loggingand income-earningarm;theDryZoneGreeningDepartment(DZGD)forreforestationincentralBurma;thePlanningandStatisticsDepartment;andtheNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs(NCEA).In2007-08fiscalyeartheforestrysectorearnedthegovernment83.5billonKyat,butwhichonlyrepresentsa½percentofthecountry’stotalGDP,accordingtonationalstatistics.77 Thegovernment-controlledexportofteaklogsreacheditsmaximumvolumeandvaluein2006-07atnearly300,000tonsworthjustover$200millionUSD.Thetotalvalueofgovernment-exportedteaklogsfrom2003-04to2007-08reachedover$1billionUSD.
WithintheMoFthereexiststensionbetweenthedivergingagendasoftechnicalexpertiseandcommunity-managedforests,aswellasbetweentheseparategoalsofconservationandtimberextraction.Forestconservationandcommercialtimberextractionaremanagedbydifferentdepartments(FDandMTE,respectively,)whichcarriesobviousproblemsandconflicts.
Theprivate sector is nowallowed towork in cooperationwith theMyanmarTimberEnterprise(MTE)undertheMoFforexportingvalue-added,semi-processedwoodproductsonly.But theprivate sectorhasbeencooperatingwithMTE for loggingandarrangingbusinessdealswithforeignbuyers,eventhoughitisthenexportedviaMTE.Andsince2005thegovernmentallowsBurmeseprivateinvestorstoestablishtreeplantations,includingteakbutonlywithspecialpermissionsinceit isstillastate-ownedtree.Itappearsthatprivate treeplantationsarebecomingamorepopular formof investmentbyBurmeseforesters,althoughasofyetisnotapopulartrendcomparedtoagribusiness.
MyanmarTimberEnterprise(MTE)generatestheincomenecessaryfortheMoFtofunction,butasaresultcarriesmorepoliticalinfluenceandresourcescomparedtoForestDepartmentaswellasappliesloggingpressureontheveryforestresourcestherestoftheministryprotects.MTEiswellknowntonotfollowthemeasuressetoutintheBurmaSelectionSystem (BSS)andAnnualAllowableCut (AAC).78MTE,due to severely limitinghuman,financecapital,andtechnicalresource,oftensubcontractoutconcessionstotheprivatesectortocarryout loggingoperations.Howeverthesubcontractors(e.g.,HtooTrading,amongmanyothers)thenmustselltheirsetvolumeoftimbertotheMTEatagivenprice,evenifitisforexporttoprivateforeigncompanies.However,thestatehasamonopolyon
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
33
teaktrees.Ineffect,then,MTEcontrolstheloggingandtimbertrade,butitisinfactcarriedoutbytheBurmeseprivatesector,wherebothentitiesprofit.
AnnualAllowableCutswerebasedonpartialsurveysdoneintheearly1960s,whichwerethenextrapolatedtothewholecountry,despitemuchofthecountrythenmiredincivilwar.ThisisamajorflawoftheestablishedAACfiguresevenifpreciselyfollowed.79Basedontheforeignexchangeearningsexpectation,atargetvolumeiscalculatedwhichisthentranslateddownwardsintologgingquotasforeachloggingdistrict.Thesehavelittlebearingoncapacityoftheforest,thecalculatedAAC,andthereforethesustainabilityofforestryoperations.TheAACoccasionallychangesbytheregimetomaintainannualrevenuebutnotactuallyameasureofchangingtimberstock.AccordingtotheFD’sPlanningandStatisticsDivision,the2010AACforteakissetat147,300trees(176,760tons)andforotherhardwoods1,131,461trees(1.584milliontons).xviiiOverall,since1970teakproductionhasexceededtheAACbyatleastanaverageof15percent,accordingtoevenofficialfigures,80whichisassumedtoactuallybemuchhigher.
4.1.2 Forest Law and Policy
The1992Forest Law supports conservation, sustainable forestry and socio-economicbenefitswhilealsopartiallydecentralizingandencouragingtheprivatesectorandcommunityparticipation in forestmanagement.The1995MyanmarForestPolicyandtheupdated1996ForestWorkingPlansareresponsibleforimplementingthe1992ForestLaw.Specifically,thelawandpolicyadvocateforaparticipatoryapproachtoforestmanagement,includingcommunityforestryforsupplementinglivelihoods.The30-yearNationalForestryActionPlanfor2001onlyseekstostrengthenconservationgoalsandenforcementoflawsagainstillegalextractionofforestproducts,withoutanymentionoftheneedtoincludevillagersasstakeholdersinthenation’sforests.Nospecificlegallandrightsareavailabletolocalpeople’sclaimtouseoraccessforestresources,severelyimpingingoncommunitiesfoodandforestlandtenuresecurity.
ForestReserveandProtectedPublicForest together formthePermanentForestEstate(PFE),whichaccordingtotheForestPolicy1995itisbeingtargetedfor30percentofthecountry’stotallandwhichisthusofflimitsforlocallivelihoods.Inadditiontheprotectedareasystem(PAS)isslottedtocover10percentofthecountry’stotalterritory.However,asof2003,onlyabout22percentoftotallandareahasbeengivenfulllegalprotectionundertheForestReserveSystem,whichisonlyabouthalfoftheexistingforestareaaccordingtogovernmentdata.
InadditiontoPFE,averycrucialadditionthathasthepotentialtogreatlyenhancelocalforest resource security isanadditional10percentof thecountry’s total land is tobemanagedformultiplelandusemixing,includingagroforestryandcommunityforests.
4.1.3 Community Forestry
Followingthe1992ForestLawand1995ForestPolicy,thegovernmentlegallyrecognizespeople’sco-managementinforestrywiththecreationofthe1995CommunityForestry
xviii TheFDcalculatesthevolumeasonaverage1.2tonsperteaktree,and1.4tonsperhardwoodtree.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
34
Instructions (CFI). Theoverallprinciples inCFIare for local communities to fulfillbasiclivelihoodneeds forfirewood, farm implementsand smalltimbers aswell as reforestdegradedforestlands.Thecommunityforestryusergroups(FUGs)collaboratewithNGOsanddistrictFDofficialsinmanagingtheCF.Althoughinitiallycreatedin1995,onlysincethemid-2000sdidCFestablishmentreallybegintogainmomentuminBurma,andmostlyin thenorth. This is due to the increasing land tenure threats, namely agribusinessconcessionsbeingdemarcatedinfarmer’suplandforestsandtaungya(Burmesewordforupland swiddenpractices).Once the CF is officially grantedby the district ForestryDepartmentandotherrelevantagencies,theFUGhasmoreprotecteduserrightsoverthatland,makingitmuchmoredifficultforthelandtobegrantedtoanoutsideparty.EstablishingaCFisoneoftherareland-basedresistancestrategiesavailabletovillagers,whosetraditionallandmanagementpractices(taungya) arenotarecognized.Alegally-establishedCFbetterensures legallyprotected landuse (see sections4.2 and5.5 formoredetailson landconfiscationforagribusiness).VillagersestablishingCFs,isthusmoreaboutkeepingvillageland,notnecessarilyaboutexplicitlyconservingforests.
Theprocessofestablishingcommunityforestsoverthepastdecadehasbeenslowerthananticipated,withtheannualrateofestablishmentatonlyabout8,000acres,despiteanationaltargetof1.5millionacresby2030.81By2010,justover100,000acresofcommunityforestshavebeen legallyestablished (recognizedand recordedby thecentral ForestryDepartment)inthewholecountry,overhalfofwhichisjustinsouthernShanState(192communityforestsestablishedby2010).82
WhencommunityforestinstructionsareimplementedmostForestUserGroupsseemtobeplantingmostlyhigh-valuetimberspecies,suchasteak,Pyinkado,andPadauk,withlittlefocusonagroforestrystrategiesorlocalforestneedssuchasfirewood,norattentiontogenderdynamicsorensuringparticipationfromthemostmarginalizedhouseholds.Asaresultthisiscausingproblemswithfoodsecurityforthevillages.ThereforewhileCFisoneofthecountry’smostpromisinglegalavenuestoprotectvillagelandandprovideaplatformforvillageparticipationinlandgovernance,newproblemshavearosethatstillneedattention.
4.1.4 Case Study: Community Forest in a Kachin Village83
InaKachinvillage,whichwillnotbe identifieddue tosecurity reasons,1,400acresofcommunityforestwereestablishedwithinthevillageterritoryin2007.Originallythelandusedforthecommunityforestoperatedundercollectivecustomaryrulesandregulations,butduetosomedegreeofcommunitybreakdown,thelandoperatedmoreasanopen-access commons,without anydirect state control or tax. The villageput together acommunityforestryusergroup,whothenappliedtothedistrictForestryDepartmentforestablishingacommunityforest.
Swiddencultivation,ortaungya, wascarriedoutonthenearbyforesthillbeforeitbecameacommunityforest.Butnowthatthecommunityhasanofficialcommunityforestpermitfrom theForestDepartment, theyplantmostlyhardwood trees,with intercroppingofannualcropsforthefirstfewyearsoftreeestablishment.Oncetheycannolongerdoanyintercropping,thevillagerssaytheywillgotoadifferentplotoflandintheirvillageterritorytogrowfoodcrops(thereisnoshortageoflandinthevillage).
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
35
The species of trees that they planted include teak,yeminay, pyinkado (ironwood), taungdama,etc.,mostlyfortimberbutalsoafewthatcanbeusedforfirewood.Someofthetreeseedlingstheygetfromtheforest(‘wildlings’),somefromtheForestDepartment(teakandpyinkado),andsomegrowintheirowntreeseedlingnurserylocatedalongthenearbyriver.
Theyareworriedaboutfoodsecuritybecausemuchoftheirlaborisnowoccupiedwithmaintainingthecommunityforest,suchasweeding.Accordingtothecommunityforestryusergroup,theyhaveexperiencedmanyworryingproblemsasaresultoftheircommunityforest:
1. Timeandenergyisspentgrowingtrees,notcrops(timecompetition).2. Theyhavetousetheirownmoneytobuysomeofthetreeseedlings(thosenotprovided
bytheForestDepartment).ForthosespeciestheyarenotgrowingthemselvesandtheForestDepartmentdoesnotprovide,theybuythemfromanearbyvillagewhogrowsthem.Thisisputtingafinancialburdenonhouseholds.
3. Thereisnownotenoughfoodtosupporthouseholds.TheyearthatthecommunityforestwasestablishedtheUN’sWorldFoodProgramhadtogivefoodhandoutstothevillage.
Thecommunityforestryusergroupsummarizesthesetrade-offs:“Westartedtohaveariceshortageproblemsincelastyearwhenwestartedthecommunityforest.Weexpecttocontinuetohavericeshortagesinthefuture.Thisisdirectlybecauseofthecommunityforest,becausenowwedonothaveenough labor todo taungya. Sinceadopting thecommunity forestpracticeswedonothaveenoughlaborfortaungya,becausewehavetomanagetreesandlesscropscannowbeplantedbecausenowwehavetosharespacewithtrees.”
Despitetheseproblemsarisingfromthecommunityforest,thevillagestill insistsonitsvaluebecause theywant toprotect their territory fromconfiscation fromencroachingprivatecompaniesinsearchoflandforagriculturaldevelopment.Theyareusingcommunityforestry as a legalmechanism toprotect their land. Soon after the allocationof thecommunityforest,thegovernmentallocateda10,000acrerubberandteakplantationtoaBurmesecompanythatislocatedwithinthevillageterritory.SincethecommunityhadalreadyappliedfortheirCF,thatlandwasnotincludedintheconcessionarea–itisnowsurroundedbytheconcession.Thevillagersseetheircommunityforestactivismassuccessfulinkeepingsomevillagelandunderthecontrolofvillagersinthefaceofagribusiness.
4.2 Land Laws and Policies
4.2.1 Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation (MoAI)
In1992theagricultureandforestrysectorsinstitutionallysplit,creatingaseparateministryforeach.TheMinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation(MoAI)comprises13departments.OneofthemostimportantdepartmentsistheSettlementandLandRecordsDepartment(SLRD),whichisresponsibleforsurveyingandmappingtheland,providinglandusecertificates,andfacilitatinglandconcessions.TheotherimportantdepartmentistheDepartmentofAgriculturalPlanning(DAP),whoisresponsibleformakingsureproductivityordersfrom
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
36
thecentralgovernmentarefulfilledontheground.AlsoofsignificanceistheBurmaPerennialCropsEnterprise(MPCE),whichisresponsibleforsugarcaneandperennialcrops,suchasrubberandpalmoil.
TheGeneralAssembly (GA),under theMinistryofHomeAffairs, is thehighest levelofauthority in thedistrict that collects land revenueasassessedby theSLRD.TheLand Management Committee(LMC)isacrucialagencyforgovernmentlandmanagementinBurma,fromthevillageuptothecentrallevel.TheCentralLMCisheadedbytheMinisteroftheMoAI,withothermembersincludingMoF,theSecretaryoftheSLRD,andDGsfromrelevantdepartmentswithintheseministries.However, itappearsthatmilitaryofficialshavesufficientlypenetratedtheLMCwhichhaslenttowardscorruptionandservingtheinterestsofinfluentialpeople.
DuringthepastdecadetheMoAIhasgainedinprominenceastheministrywithjurisdictionoverhugelandareasofthecountry,andindeedthewaterthat irrigates it.ThemarketliberalizationpoliciesBurmabeganin1988seemstobebenefitingMoAImuchmorethanMoFasnowprivateagriculturalconcessionscanbegrantedtowell-placedagribusinessmen.
4.2.2 Customary Land Rights
Bothstatutory(nationalstatelaws)andcustomarylaws(local,traditional,non-statesocialsystems)arefollowedinBurma,sometimessimultaneouslyinthesameplace.Overall,itcanbegeneralizedthatintheuplandsofethnicareascustomarylandpracticesprevail,andthelowlandsfollowstatutorylaws.However,thereareofcoursemanyexceptions;foronetheethnicuplandshavebeenterrorizedbywarandconflictforgenerations,whichhasledtofleeing,internallydisplacedpersons,militarizationandcompromisedtraditionalpractices– allofwhichhaveweakenedtraditionalsocialsystemsandtheirlandmanagementpractices.Thesituationnowisthatcustomarylandpracticesappeartobeonthewane.Inceasefireareasthestateisextendingtheircontroloverlandandpopulations,withtheirattendantlandcategories(e.g.,forestandagricultureratherthanagro-forestrysystems).Andinactivewar zones local ethnicpopulationsare kept frompracticing their traditional swiddencultivationduetotheconstantthreatofwarfareandfear.
Uplandethnicpopulationsnowfindthemselvesstuckinthecrossfireoftheroughtransitiontoanopeningmarketcapitalismwhere landistransferredfromsmallholderfarmerstolargeprivatecompanies,bothBurmeseandforeign.Aspreviouslycustomarylawswerehonoredandthestatehadnotreachedtheuplandsinmostethnicstates,mosthouseholdsintheruraluplandsdonothaveanylandregistrationtitles.DuringtheBritishcolonialtimesafewformalizedcustomaryruleswereenactedand insomesmallwaysrecognizedforcertainareasoftheuplandsofnorthernandwesternBurma.Forexample,theKachin Hills Manual (specificallyChapters3and7)respectedcustomaryauthorityofKachinheadmen,andfortheChinspecificlawswerecreatedtoaddresstheircustoms,calledtheChin Hills Regulation 1896,andtheChin Special Division (Extension of Laws) Act,1948.
TheSPDCdoesnotlegallyhonorcustomaryrightsandlaws,withinadequateprovisionsinthenewconstitutiontoupholdcustomarytraditions.Inpractice,however,thereisamessyinformaloverlapbetweencustomaryandstatutorylawsandpractices,whereSLRDofficers
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
37
recordcustomaryagriculturallandplotsfortheirsurveysandmaps,butatthesametimeisnothonoredwhendesiredbyaninfluentialdeveloperbackedbythestate.Itisthisgreyareawithrespecttothecustomary-statutoryspectrumthatcauseslandtenureinsecurityformillionsoffarmersinBurma,especiallyintheethnicuplands.
Land tenure remains veryweak inBurma,especially in theuplandswhere customarypracticesarestilloftenfollowedinsteadofstatutorylaw.84Afundamentalproblemisthatnolawformallyrecognizestraditionaluplandlanduse.Thismeansthatifafarmerwantstopracticecustomaryshiftingcultivation,thenthatpracticewillnotbeformallyrecognizedby the government, and thus there is noway to legally protect this traditional landmanagementpractice.TheCommunityForestry Instructions,whileagoodopportunity,areoftennotimplementedasatraditionallandmanagementstrategyandthuschangethewaylocalpeopleuse,accessandmanageland.TheyarejointlymanagedwiththeForestryDepartmentandoftenpromotegrowingtimberratherthanfood.
4.2.3 Statutory Land Laws
TheLand Acquisition Act, whichisstillineffecttoday,legallygivesthegovernmenttherightto takeover any land, butwith compensation to its original owners. The1953Land Nationalization Act andthe1963Tenancy Law gavelegalpowertothestatetoseizeallland(andthereforealllandownedbythestate,asisstillthecasetoday)andredistributeaccordingtosocialistprinciples.LegalpracticeinBurmatodaygenerallyrevertstothe1953Land Nationalization Act,whichrecognizessomeprivateownershipofagriculturalland(section38),althoughitrestrictssaleortransfer(sections9-12).However,insections9-12,thesameActprovidesfortheStatetoconfiscatefallowland(alsoatypeof‘absenteeownership’),amajorproblemforsmallholderfarmersandcompaniesalike.Thelawdoesnotpermitoutrightprivateownershipofland,andsoalllandmustbeleasedfromthestate,asisstillthesituation.Inpractice,however,thelandiseitherallocatedbythecustomaryownertoarelativeortoapayingfarmer.Thesepost-coloniallawsrelyuponcolonialtraditionswhererightstolandremaincontingentonthelandbeingcontinuouslyusedina‘productive’wayorelsethestatehastherighttoconfiscateit(unlessa‘fallowtax’ispaidbymorewealthyfarmers) andput it tomoreefficientuse– a situationwe see todaywith large-scaleconcessions granted to theprivate sector. This is in spiteof the still active1963 Law Safeguarding Peasant Rightswhichforbidsfarmer’slandbeingconfiscated,harkingbacktothesocialisterawhichadvocatedforpeasantrightstoland.
In1988aftertheinfamousprotestsandthebreakdownofthesocialisteconomy,theSLORC(thenameofthegovernmentatthattime)begantoopenuptheeconomyinsuchawaywecouldcallita“militarycommandeconomy”wheretheemergingprivatesectorcouldbegintooperatebutonlyfavoredcompaniesingoodrelationwiththemilitaryleaders,andundertheircarefulconscription.Followingthisnewtrend,SLORCenactedthePrescribing Duties and Rights of the Central Committee for the Management of Cultivable Land, Fallow Land and Waste Land,1991(orManagement of Cultivable Land, Fallow Land and Waste Land, ormoresimplytheWastelands Law).Thislawsoughttoencouragethedevelopmentofso-called‘wastelands’,orbasicallylandwithnolandtitle,throughenlistingtheprivatesector.xixTooverseetheimplementationofthislawthegovernmentformedtheCentral
xix Registeringtocultivate“virginland”isthesameprocessasfor‘wasteland’.But“virginland”iscontrolled
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
38
Committee for the Management of Cultivable Land, Fallow Land and Waste Landthesameyear(hereincalledtheLandManagementCommittee,orLMC).Thedutiesofthiscentralcommitteeistosystematicallyscrutinizeallapplicationssubmittedtogranttherighttocultivatewastelandandfallowlandbystate-ownedeconomicenterprises,jointventures,andcorporationsandprivateindividualsforcommercialreasons.
TheLMCmayassignprivateagriculturalblocksofupto5,000acresforselectedperennialindustrialcropssuchassugarcane,oilpalmandrubber,and1,000toamaximumof3,000acresfororchardcrops.Ifthislandisdeveloped,morelandcanbegranted,uptoapossible50,000acreswithamaximumleaseperiodof30years.Thecompanymust,within4to5yearsfromthedateofbeinggrantedtheland,fullycultivatethewholeareaoftheirlandconcession,orelseitcanbetakenbackbythegovernment(althoughthishasneverbeenreported).Alsopartofthecontractisexemptionsfromtaxesforadeterminedperiodoftime.Theprivateentityisgrantedpermissiontoexportacertainpercentageoftheharvest(upto50percent),withtheresttobesoldonthedomesticmarket.Non-citizensmayapplyfor landforagricultural investment,asapprovedbytheBurmaInvestmentCommission(BIC),althoughthisisveryrareastaxesandotherfeesareexceedinglyhighwithadifficultandlongbureaucraticprocess.InsteadforeigncompaniesworkwithBurmesecompanies,eitherasaformaljoint-ventureagreement,ormorecommonly,informallytogetthemostpreferentialtaxbreaksandeasewithwhichtoinvest.TheTransfer of Immoveable Property Restriction Law 2005madetheallocationoflandtoaforeignentityillegal,butthisisnownolongerthecaseasthegovernmentonlyveryrecentlybeganencouragingforeignerstoinvestinlanddevelopmentbyleasinga100%foreign-ownedlandconcession.
Inthelowlandsfarmersoftenrelyoninformalsocialsystemstosecurecontinuedlanduseandaccess;howevermorewell-placedfarmers(withusuallyhigherincomesandconnectionstoauthorities)areabletoapplyforlandusecertificateswhichincreaselandtenuresecurity–although itcertainlydoesnotguaranteeagainst landconfiscation.Thefirstregistrationformisa‘105’,whichactsas‘non-permanentholdingregister’withtheSLRD.Afterseveralyears(officiallythree)ofcontinualcultivationonthatplotofland(nofallowingallowed),andpendingrelationshipswiththeSLRDofficials,thehouseholdcanobtaina‘106’landregistrationpermitwitha‘permanentholdingregister’.SomeNGOsinBurmaarefacilitatinghouseholdstoobtaintheselandusecertificates,althoughtheimpactisverylow,itisatime-consumingandexpensiveprocess,andstilldoesnotguaranteeagainstlandthreats,suchasconfiscationbybusinessesandthemilitary.
Processessuchastheseandthepoliciesthatsupportthemdiscouragetraditionaluplandfarmingpractices(taungya)whichkeepsoilfertile.Otherpracticeswhichdon’tallowlandtofallowaffectsoilfertilityandthereforerequirechemicalfertilizerswhicharedamagingtocommunitiesandtheenvironment.
Aspartofthelandallocationprocesstoprivatecompaniesagriculturalconcessionsareissuedwithoutanyfurtherlandsurveyoranenvironmentalimpactassessment(EIA),asno such laws are in place. Although the authorities coerce the companies to boost
byMoF,notMoAI,sotheprocessnotonlyinvolvesSLRD,butalsoMoFwhoareoftennothappywithcultivationofthislandastheythenlosejurisdictionoverthisland,nottomentionusuallyanegativeimpactonecologicalintegritywhichtheMoFremainsmoreconcernedaboutcomparedtoMoAI.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
39
productivityintheconcessions,oftentimestheallocatedlandisnotfullyutilizedduetoitssheerhugesize,orinmanyotherinstancesthecompanyleavesafterloggingtheforestlandandsellingthewoodontheblackmarket.Theexistinglandallocationrules,asregulatedbytheLMC,donot specifyagainstallocatingsmalllandplotstosmall-scalefarmers;howevernowastelandhasyetbeenallocatedtosmallholderfarmersasaleverofrurallivelihooddevelopmentormoreradicallandredistributionefforts,despitesomeclaimsassuch.Thejustificationbythegovernmentfornotdoingsoisthatneithersmallholdersnorthelandlesshaveaccesstocapitalfordevelopingtheland.85Thereasonsfarmers,especiallysmall-scalefarminghouseholds(under10acres)donothaveaccesstocapitalisbecausehouseholdscannotusetheirlandascollateralforloans.Withoutproperruralcreditavailabletofarmersthroughoutthecountry,thecollapseofthenationalbankingsystem,andagovernmentsuspiciousaboutmicro-creditfinancing,farminghouseholdsareoftenleftnooptionbuttotakeoutveryhighinterestrateloans(upto20percent)bylocalmoneylenders.Whileit isactually illegal for land tobe forfeited for failureof loan repayment, inactual factlandlessnesssoarsinBurmaduetofarmerslosinglandtotheviciouscycleofdebt.
4.2.4 Case Study: Yuzana Concession in Hugawng Valley
YuzanaCompany,ownedbyUHtayMyint,wasgranteda200,000acreagriculturalconcessioninHugawngValleyborderingandwithintheHugawngValleyTigerReserveinwesternKachinStatein2006.xxYuzanamadeanagreementwiththethenNorthernRegionalCommanderMaj.Gen.OhnMyintontheconcessionarea,andthenthetownshipSLRDwasbroughtintothenegotiations.TheForestDepartmentwasexcluded.ThelandthattheSLRDdemarcatedtoYuzanawasinclusiveofbothvillager’scustomaryfarmingandvillageland(eventhoughsomeofthelandwasregisteredandmarkedonSLRDmaps)aswellastheHugawngValleyTigerReserve.Theconcessionlandincludesforest,wetland,andfloodedland,aswellasvillager’spaddyfarms.TheForestDepartmentmadeYuzanakeepa10kmforestedcorridorfortigerstopotentiallypassthroughthevalleyfromonemountaintothenext.
Reportedlynearly14villagesareincludedwithintheconcessionarea,withanestimated5,000villagersaloneinjustonepartofYuzana’sconcession.86Thecountry’slargestprivatelandconcessionhasattractedgrowingdiscontentfromforciblyrelocatedvillagers.YuzanahasplantedtensofthousandsofacresofcassavafortheChinesebiofuelmarket,whilesugarcaneisoflessinterestatthistimeduetoalowermarketpricecomparedtocassava.HoweverYuzanahasasugarcaneseedbanktoprepareforcommercialplantingintheirconcessionbeginning in2011.Thecompanyhasconstructedprocessingplants,storagefacilities,dormitoriesforlaborers,warehouses,etc.
YuzanaisnotusinglocallaborbutratherBurmanlaborfromCentralBurmaandNargis-affectedvillagesintheIrrawaddyDelta.However,afterafewmonthslaborersoftenleaveforgoldminingwheretheycouldmakemoremoney,soYuzanaistryingtouseasmallernumberoflaborersthroughtheuseoflargetractorsandharvestingmachinesfromThailand.Subsequently,YuzanahashiredThaidriverstooperatethevehicles.
When tensionwasbuildingbetween the government and theKachin Independence
xx Differentmediasourcesquotevarioussizesoftheconcession,mostoften200,000acresbutsometimesalso300,000acres,andafewevencite400,000acres.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
40
Organization(KIO)leadinguptothenationalelections,Yuzanaallegedlyarmedabout800Yuzanaemployees,manyofwhomareformersoldiersintheBurmaArmy,withmilitarytrainingprovidedbyInfantryBattalion297inJahtuzupvillage.PrivatesecurityhiredbyYuzanaandBurmaArmysoldiersguardthefactoryzone,whileabout200soldiersfromInfantryBattalion297inJahtuzupvillagepatrolthemiddleconcessionarea.87
MuchofYuzana’sconcessionisforestland,wheretechnicallytheFDhasjurisdictionoverthetrees,althoughYuzanahasuserrightstothelandaccordingtotheirlease.LocalvillagersreportthatYuzanaissellinghigh-valuetimberwithintheconcession,presumablyontheblackmarket,andthatonlythenon-valuablespeciesareburnedorhauledawayforvillagerstouseasfirewood.Accordingtoonereport,inJune2009,almost50trucksofhardwoodlogsperdaywereseenleavingthevalleytoMogaungtrainstation.Theclear-cutloggingwithinYuzana’s concession isdestroying thetigerhabitatandoneof theworld’smostvaluablelowlandrainforestsandwetlands.Inparticular,theno.1TigerConservationCampnearNawngMivillagehasbeenlogged.88
ThelandconfiscationandtransformationinHugawngValleyhasnotbeenwithoutcoercionand villager’s backlash. TheHugawngValleyDevelopment andAgricultural PlanningCommittee(HVDAPC),composedof19representativesfromfivedifferentvillagesandover800farmers,signedapetitionletterin2007sentittoSeniorGeneralThanShweovertheimpactoftheYuzanaconcessionontheirlivesandlivelihoodsandtheirlackofadequatecompensation.89Despite theirgrassrootsorganizingefforts,byFebruary2010over150householdsoutofabout1,000householdsinatotalof6villages(Warazup,Nansai,Bankawk,LaJaPa,AwngraandJahtuzup)wereforcedofftheirlandsandrelocatedtoaYuzana‘modelvillage’withpoorfarminglandwithoutfishinggrounds.90OneNGOhassofardocumented3,600acresof landconfiscatedin11villages.91Manyofthemwerecoercedintotakingcompensationfunds,althoughsomeresistedastheyfounditinadequate.
ThesituationescalatedwheninJuly2010agroupoftheaggrievedfarmersfiledalawsuitonbehalfofallthefarmerswhoselandwastakenagainstYuzanaduetotheirgrievances.FarmersrejectedYuzana’sofferofpaymentsof80,000Kyat($80)peracre(300,000Kyatperacreisclaimedtobeamoreaccuratevalue)toamaximumof500evictedfarmersiftheydroppedthecase,andpushedaheadintheKachinStatecourt.92AfewhundredvillagershavebeenpursuinganInternationalLaborOrganization(ILO)investigationinparallel93–althoughithasbournelittlefruityet.InOctober,however,thecourtclearedHtayMyintfromanywrongdoingandinsteadplacedPuKyi,HtayMyint’sbrother,asresponsible.94
Atthistime,Ms.BawkJa,theappointedleaderofthefarmersbringingsuitinthecourtcase,decidedtotakeherfightintothenationalpoliticalspotlightbycontestingtheNovembernationalelectionsasacandidatefromtheNationalDemocraticForce(NDF) inHpakantTownship.Shethoughtcontestingtheelectionswouldgiveheraddedprotectionasshecontinuedherfightinthecourts..HeropposingcandidatewasMaj.Gen.OhnMyint,theformernorthernmilitarycommanderwithdeepbusinessrelationsinthecontestedminingtownship.95Afterthe‘pre-castvotes’werecounted,shelost.
InearlyJanuary2011theMyitkyinacourtorderedHtayMyinttopay80,000Kyatperacreofpaddyand150,000Kyatperhouseconfiscated,althoughonlysomefarmerswereeligible
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
41
toreceivecompensation.96Thisisthesameamountoriginallyofferedtothevillagers.AfterelectionsMs.BawkJawentintohidingforprotectionaftermanyauthorityfigurestriedtoapprehendherforquestioningandarrest.97AdditionalreportedYuzanacompanyabusesintheareaincluderape.98
Figure 2 Yuzana company bulldozing land for a cassava mono plantation, Hugawng valley tiger reserve. KDNG, 2010.
4.3 Economic development and natural resources in Burma
4.3.1 Political Economy of Land Development
Sincetheearly1990stheBurmesegeneralshaveslowlydismantledthesocialistapparatustorebuildapartiallycapitalistmarketeconomy,butwithalingeringsocialistideology,lawsandpolicies.Article(35)ofthe2008Constitutionstatesthat,“TheeconomicsystemoftheUnionisamarketeconomysystem.”SeanTurnell,aneconomistfocusedonBurma,notesthatBurmalacksbasicmarketinstitutionssuchastheruleoflawandsoundpropertyrights,andoperatesaccordingtoasetofparallelrulesofinformaleconomysetbythestateandeconomicelitessuchas“arbitraryproceduresfordisputesettlement,nepotisticpatron-clientrelationshipsbetweenthemilitary,stateandbusinessandextralegalallocationsofnaturalresourceconcessions”.99Theresulthasbeenneitherreapingtheproposedequityofsocialismnortheeconomiclifelineofcapitalism;insteadaratherdisastrouscollusionofthetwopoliticaleconomicsystemshasleftfarmersandurbanpoorhighlyvulnerabletosomesectorsoperatinginthemarketeconomybutwithoutadequatelawsandpoliciestoprotectthem.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
42
Forexample,thestatestillownsalllandandresourcesinthecountry,withmostvillagershavingnoformallandtitlefortheircustomaryagriculturalland.Newpolicieshavebeenpassed,however, allocating land concessions toprivateentitieswhichdonot respectcustomarylandorinformallandholdings.Theresultisanincreasingnumberoflandplotsandgreateracreagefallingunderthecontrolofcompaniesattheexpenseofsmallholderfarmers,whohavenolegalrecoursetoholdontotheirlandagainstencroachingbusinessmen(see section4.2).This ‘neither-socialism-nor-capitalism’ scenario inBurma isespeciallydangerousduetothepoliticalclimateinthecountryaswellastheabsenceofanysafeguardstoprotectfarmersfromtheonslaughtofcapitalismormechanismstohelpthembenefit.Conditionsarenowinplaceforrepeatinghistoryinthemid-1900swithpeasantsdefaultingontheirloansandsubsequentlylosingtheirlandtoIndianChettiars–whichledtosocialupheavalandeventuallytriggeredBurma’sexperimentwithauthoritariansocialism.
Various lawsandpolicieshavebeenenactedandimplementedinthe1990sand2000swhichhaveledtotheprivatesector,bothdomesticandinternational,toengageintheresourceextractionsectors,includingmostrecentlylarge-scaleagriculturallandconcessions(seesection4.2onlandandagriculturallaws/policiesformoreinformationonthedifferentlawsandpolicieswhichhaveusheredintheinvolvementofprivateinvestmentinBurma).Itseemsthattherecentspateofsemi-privatizationisastrategybythemilitarygeneralstostillgenerateameansofeconomicandpoliticalsupportandinfluenceinapost-electionBurma,asprivateconcessionsareallallottedtoregime-favoredBurmesecompaniesinacompletelynon-transparentnor‘free-and-fair’manner.
Burmese Agribusiness Companies
Overalltwodifferentpolitical-economictrajectoriesaretakingplaceinBurma:emergingopportunities forBurmesebusinessmen to invest in landand resources inBurma;andsecondly,bilateralresourceextractionagreementswiththeBurmeseleadersandforeigngovernmentsandcorporations.Bothscenariosarebeginningtoconvergeintoasituationofmuchhigherflowsofdomesticandtransnationalfinancecapitalintovariousresourcesectors,includinglandasavaluableasset.Whileofcoursethemassiveforeignresourceextractionconcessions, suchas inoil, gasandhydropower, should continue to receivecarefulattentionandscrutiny,domesticprocessessupportingprivateinvestment,especiallylandasavaluableresourceinitself,ishighlyimportantyetrelativelyunstudied.Since2008afterCycloneNargis thegenerals, lobbiedbytheBurmeseprivatesector,appeartobechangingtheirapproachtohowlandandresourcesshouldbeusedandmanagedbyBurmeseprivatecompanies.Itissuspectedthepost-electiongovernmentwilllatchontoeconomicgrowthtobolsteritsdomesticandinternationallegitimacyandpopularity.
Agribusiness inBurmaisperhapsthenewestformofprivate-publicpartnerships inthecountry.Theruralpopulationthatengagesprimarilyinagricultureis70-80%ofthecountry’stotalpopulation,withtheagriculturalsectoraccountingforabout35percentofthecountry’sGDP.100Manyfactorshavehelpedformsuchanagribusinessenvironment,suchaspost-Nargisagriculturalaidandrecovery,newlimitedgovernmentloanstoBurmesecompaniestoengageinlarge-scaleagriculturalproduction,adesireforBurmesecompaniestoadvancemodernagriculturaltechniquesto increaseyield(andthereforeprofit),andthecentralgovernment’srecentdeclarationofBurmabeinga“foodsurpluscountry”withnewpriorityonexportingagriculturalcommodities.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
43
NearlyallagriculturalconcessionsinthecountryarerunbyBurmesecompanies.Thereareveryfew100percentforeign-ownedagriculturaloperationsfunctioninginBurmaduetoveryhightaxesandanextremelyrestrictivebusinessenvironment.However,itissuspectedthatmanyofthemhaveforeigninvestmentbacking,dependingonthesizeoftheconcession,itslocation,andthecropbeingplanted(e.g.,mainlandChineseforrubberinthenorth,MalaysianChineseforoilpalminTennasserim,etc.).Withthegenerals’recentpushforincreasedagriculturalcommodityexport,30-40favoredBurmesecompanieswereselectedtohelprealizethisnewpolicydirective,whichresultedinlarge-scaleagriculturalconcessionsbeingallocatedtothem.By2010atotalof1.7millionacreshadbeenreportedasallocatedto216companies inelevenstatesanddivisions.Whilenearlyhalfof thetotalacreageallocatedwas in Tennasserim (in supportofoil palmplantationdevelopment,mostlycapitalizedbyUHtayMyint’sYuzanaCompany),thenexthighestamountofacreageallottedbystatesanddivisionswasKachinStateatnearly400,000acres(1/2ofwhichisYuzana’ssugarcaneconcessioninHugawngValleyTigerReserve).101
However,theseconcessionsarelocatedinmarginallandsandwithnosupportfromthegovernment.Muchofthe land isoftennotdevelopedbythecompanyfor itsspecifiedagriculturalproduction,andoftentimeswhenthecompanyestablishestheplantation,yieldsareconsiderably low.Asaresult, thesesameBurmesecompaniesarenowengaging incontractfarmingsotocompensateforthelackofreturnfromtheirlargeconcessionsthatrequiredmassivefinancialinvestments,sincetheyobtainedagriculturalcommodityexportquotasalongwiththeirconcessions.Thecompanyprovidestheinputs(loansforchemicalsandseeds)whilethefarmerprovidesthelandandlabor.Thebusinessmencanthenexporttheagriculturalproducepurchasedfromfarmers,whichishowtheycancompensatefortheirfinancial loss indeveloping their awarded concession.Another contract farmingarrangementthatisemergingisfarmersworkingonthecompany’sconcession,inexchangeforrent–butthisoffersverylittlebenefittofarmersattheexpenseofthenewlandlord.
Thesenewdynamicsinthecountry’sagriculturalsectoraremakingbigchangesinthewaythatagriculturallandandtherurallaborforceisusedandmanaged.ThisrepresentsatrendoffurthermarginalizationoffarmersfromworkingtheirlandtowardsbeingwagelaborersforlargeandpowerfulBurmesecompanies.
Thewayagriculturallanddevelopmentisunfoldinginthenorthernethnicstatesofthecountry(KachinandShanStates)isverydifferentthaninBurmanareasintheCentralDryZone,deltaregions,andTenasserimDivision.InKachinandShanStates,thereisverylittleactivitybythesewell-placedBurmesecompaniesbasedinRangoon.ItismostlyconductedbyChinesebusinessmenand investors, oftentimesbehind a local Chinese-Burmesebusinessman,mostlybasedinMyitkyinaandLashio.Themilitaryauthoritiesinthearea,especiallyregionalmilitarycommanders,playanimportantroleinadministeringcontractsforlargerlandconcessions.Inareascontrolledbyethnicpoliticalgroups,thentheChinesebusinessmenmustworkthroughhigherlevelsofthoseethnicpoliticalparties.NearlyallChineseagribusinessinvestmentinKachinandShanStatesissubsidizedbyChina’snationalopiumcropsubstitutionpolicy.102
In2006 theChinesegovernment increasedfinancial incentives toencourageChinesebusinessesinvestinginopiumsubstitutiondevelopmentinnorthernBurmaandLaos.This
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
44
includesstate-backedsubsidiesforChinesebusinessmeninvestinginagriculturalplantationsinnorthernBurma,includingtariff-freeimportquotas.TheMyanmargovernmentincludesintheirannualstatisticsacategoryfor‘AnnualandPerennialCropsSubstitutingforOpiumPoppyinBorderArea’,theonlyindicatorissuedbythegovernmentonacreagesownbyopiumcropsubstitutionprojects.Forannualcrops,atotalofover1.5millionacresweresownby2006-07.Perennial cropshavebeenprojected to reachover600,000acres in2007-8,over50percentmarkupfromtheyearbeforewithnearly400,000acres,whichwasover110percentincreasefromtheyearprior.103Ascanbeseen,thedramaticandcontinualincreaseinareaplanteddoesindeedcoincidewithChina’sopiumcropsubstitutionpolicybeingredesignedin2006withfurtherstatesupportandbroughttonorthernMyanmarbyChinesebusinessmen.
Whetherinthenorthernethnicareas,theCentralDryZone,thedeltaregion,orthefarsouth,farmersinBurmaarelosingtheirland,livelihoodsanddignity.Evengovernmentdataillustratesthetrendsthatsmallholderfarmers’landisgettingsmallerandfewerinnumber,while very large landholdings are growingexponentially.While theBurmesegovernmentcontinuestosupportfavoredBurmesecompaniestoengageintheregime’svariousagriculturalschemes,nopolicieshavebeenenactedtosupportsmallholderfarmersinBurma.Furthermore,nolawsorpoliciesexisttodealwiththeincreasingoccurrenceoffarmersbeingevictedfromtheirsubsistencelandtomakewayforprivatelandconcessions.
Foreign Direct Investment
Ahostofagreementshavebeensignedwithforeigngovernmentsandcorporationsonresourceextractionprojects,especiallyintheoilandgas,hydropowerandminingsectors,as lateroutlined in this report. Inparticular,Chinese investment invarious sectorshassoared in the lastdecade,with2010witnessingunprecedentedeconomic cooperationbetweenBurmaandChina.DuringrecentvisitsbythreeoftheninemembersofthePolitburoStandingCommittee,therespectiveleaderssigned35economicagreements.AndwhenSeniorGeneralThanShwevisitedBeijinginSeptember2010,hereputedlywantedtolearnaboutChina’seconomicreform.104
Althoughskewedbymassiveresourceextractionprojectsrecentlysigned,theamountofChineseinvestmentbetweenjustAprilandAugust2010representedtwothirdsofChina’stotalinvestmentinthecountryinthepasttwodecades.Chinesecompanieshaveinvested$8.2 billionUSD in the resource sector inMarch 2010 alone, including $5billion inhydropower,$2.15billioninoil/gassector,andnearly$1billioninmining.105ThisinvestmentispartofaChinesegovernment30-yearinterest-freeloaninSeptember2010amountingto30billionYuan ($4.2billionUSD) toBurma foreconomicdevelopment tohelp fundhydropowerprojects,roadconstruction,railwaydevelopmentandinformationtechnologydevelopment.106Notonlyhigh-profileagreementsonresourceextractionprojects,butalsobordertraderemainsaveryimportantfacettothetwocountries,withbilateraltradeinthefirstfourmonthsof2010jumpingover75percent,althoughthisisduetoincreasingChineseexportgoodsintoBurma.107YunnanreliesonBurmaforthree-fourthsofitscross-bordertrade,amountingtojustover12percentofitsannualforeigntrade.WhileBurmaisYunnan’slargestexportmarket,itisalsothesecond-largestimportmarket,especiallyrelyingonimportedagriculturalcommodities,Burma’smostsignificantexportproduct.108
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
45
OfcourseChinaisnottheonlyinvestorinBurma,althoughcertainlythemosthighlyprofiled,andwillcertainlybethenumberoneforeigninvestoraftersomeofitsrecentinvestmentsinoil,gasandhydropowergoonline.KoreaandThailand,amongothercountries,alsoprovideampleFDIinBurmafromtheirmassiveresourceextractionprojects(seemoreinsection4.3.2).
Thesefigureshowevergiveanincompleteunderstandingofthedegreetowhichforeigngovernmentofficialsandcompaniesareinvolvedinresourceextractioncontracts.Noneofthis data records informal business deals, illegal imports and exports (not throughgovernment-controlledcheckpoints),norinvestmentinareascontrolledbyethnicpoliticalgroupswitharmedwings,suchasUnitedWaStateParty(UWSP)andKachinIndependenceOrganization(KIO).Duetogreaterrestrictionsandveryhightaxes,companiesobtainlandconcessionsbyinformallysupportingaBurmesecompany,whichisthennotearmarkedasforeigninvestment.
4.3.2 Economic development, conflict and natural resources in ethnic areas
ControlovernaturalresourcesisamajorcauseofconflictinethnicareasinBurma.Forexample, in eastern Burma there has been increasedmilitarization andwidespreaddisplacementwherethereareplans,backedbyThaiandChineseinvestors,tobuildaseriesofdamsontheSalween(ThanlwininBurmese)River.Forexample,inJune2009anoffensiveinKarenStateclosetotheHatgyidamsiteontheSalweenRiverdroveover3,000KarenrefugeesintoThailand.109ObserverslinkedtheoffensivetotheneedfortheStatePeaceandDevelopmentCouncil(SPDC)andtheDemocraticKarenBuddhistArmy(DKBA)togainterritorialcontroloftheareasaroundthedamsite.
Armedconflictovernaturalresourceslikelywillcontinuegiventhesetrends.ThemajorityofBurma’sremainingvaluablenaturalresourcesarelocatedinareaswhereethnicceasefireandnon-ceasefiregroupsoperate.ForeigndirectinvestmentinBurmaisconcentratedinenergyandextractiveindustries110andrecentlytherehasbeenaheightenedinterestfromcountriesintheregionformoreinvestmentopportunities.Giventhelackofsoundeconomicpolicyandsocialandenvironmentalregulations,anincreaseinforeigninvestmentcouldhaveamajornegativeimpactontheenvironmentandcommunitieslivingintheseareas.PlannedoilandgaspipelinesbackedbyChina throughArakanState,MagwayDivision,MandalayDivision,andShanStatehavealreadyresultedinincreasedmilitarizationanddisplacementofcommunitiesalongthepipelinearea.111 112 113Theprojects,currentlyunderconstruction,riskcontributingtoarmedconflictinShanStateanddestabilizingeconomicandregionalsecurity.TheproposedpathofthepipelinesinthecontestedterritoriesofNorthernShanStateissettotraverseareasoccupiedbytheKachinIndependenceArmy’s(KIA)4thBrigade,theKachinDefenseArmy(KDA),andtheShanStateArmy-North(SSA-N)1stBrigade.114TherearealreadyreportsoffightingbetweentheShanStateArmy-North1stBrigadeandtheBurmaArmyinthevicinityofthepipelineroute.115
Thismirrorsthedevelopmentmodel imposedduringtheconstructionofthenotoriousYadanaandYetagungaspipelinesinTennaserimDivision.116Thepipelineswereconstructedinthe1990sbyFrench,American,Thai,Malaysian,andJapaneseoilcompaniesinpartnershipwith theMyanmarOilandGasEnterprise (MOGE)and theBurmaArmythroughareas
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
46
traditionallycontrolledbyethnicKarenandMonarmedgroups–theKNLAandMNLA,respectively.Tomakewayforthepipelines,theBurmaArmyconfiscatedlandandcommittedforcedlabor,torture,andkillingswhileactingassecurityforcesfortheoilfirms.Manyoftheseabusescontinetodaybybattalionsprovidingsecurityfortheoilcompaniesandthepipelines.117 118In1995-1996,therewereatleastthreeattacksintheYadanapipelineareabytheKNLA,twoofwhichtargetedthepipelinespecifically.TheBurmaArmyrespondedby inflictingviolenceon innocentvillagersandexecutingavillageheadmanandelevenothercivilians.119Sincethen,numerouskillingsintheareahavebeendocumented.120
Burmahasrecentlyincreasedbilateraleconomicinvestmentinenergyprojectswithothercountries–mostsignificantlyChina,IndiaandThailand–onprojectsinethnicareas.OtherASEANcountriesincludingMalaysiaandSingapore,andtheRepublicofKoreaarealsokeycounterparts(formoreinformationseesection5ofthisreport).
Pre-andpost-electionpoliticaldevelopmentsdidnoteasetensionsbetweenethnicceasefireandnon-ceasefiregroupsandthegovernment.Leadinguptotheelectionsthegovernmentappliedheavypressureonethniccease-firegroupstotransformintoborderguardforces(BGF)aswellasblockingcertainethnicpoliticalpartiesfromenteringtheelection.Thegovernmentalsosubduedethnicpoliticalpartiesbydisenfranchisingresidentsin300villagesinseveraltownshipsinKachin,Karenni,MonandShanStatesandfourtownshipsintheWa’sselfadministereddivision.121 122Furthermore,armedgroupshavebeguntoreorganize.InSeptember2010ethnicarmedgroupsfromKachin,Shan,Mon,Chin,KarenniandKarenareasagreedtoprovidemilitaryassistancetoeachotherifneeded.Indeed,fightingbrokeoutbetweentheSPDCarmedforcesandDKBABrigade5–abreakawayfactionoftheDKBAthatrefusedtotransformintoaBGF-inMyawaddyandThreePagodasPassinthewakeoftheelectionsinearlyNovember2010,forcingthousandstofleeacrosstheborderintoThailand.Approximately30,000refugeeshavefledacrosstheborderintoThailandsincethe elections, including hundreds fromdirectly upstreamof thedam site (formoreinformationseesection5.1).123 124 125 126 127
While indicatorspoint toa likelihoodof increasedconflict inethnicareas (evenwarasceasefiredealsfallapartfromsomegroups),thereisalsoapossibilityofdecreasedviolenceduetoeconomicmotivations.Investmentcouldresultinlesseningconflictaslocaldealsaremadebetweenbusinesspeople,thegovernmentandlocalethnicleaders.Inthecease-fireagreementsoftheearly1990s,themilitaryregimecommonlyofferedco-operativearrangementstoethnicleaderstoexploitnaturalresourcesiftheyagreedtoacease-fire.However,whilemoreceasefiredealsmaydampenovertviolence,ascanbeseenfrompreviousceasefiresthatviolenceistransformedintonewtypesofconflict,suchasthroughsocialupheaval,increaseddruguse,migration,landconfiscation,etc.
Regionalpoliticscouldalsoplayaroleinsubduingconflict.ChinahasmadeborderstabilityatoppriorityinitsengagementwithBurmaandborderethnicgroups,especiallywiththeUnitedWaStateArmy(UWSA),KachinIndependenceArmy(KIA),andNationalDemocraticAllianceArmy(NDAA),demonstratingitsconcernthatthreatstoborderstabilitywouldthreatenitsstrategicandgrowingeconomicinterests.xxi
xxi BorderstabilitywasapriorityduringtwohighlevelvisitstoBurmain2009and2010,andagainduringThanShwe’svisittoBeijinginSeptember2010.Chinaalsofacilitatedaseriesof13negotiationsbetweenthe
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
47
4.3.3 The Role of International Financial Institutions in Burma
Burmacurrentlyhasasubstantialforeigndebttomultilaterallenders,mostofitwhichisformallyinarrearsxxii.BurmastartedborrowingfromtheWorldBankin1956,buttherehasbeennoWorldBank loan since July1987. Theoutstanding loans to theWorldBank’sInternationalDevelopmentAssociationtotal$719millionUSD.128Since1998,Burmahasbeenin“non-accrualstatus”withtheWorldBank,meaningthattheoverduedebtmustbeclearedbeforetherecanbeanynewlending.Similarly,sinceBurmabecameamemberoftheAsianDevelopmentBank(ADB)in1973itreceivedloanstotaling$530millionUSD,while the country owes theADB $325millionUSD.While not receiving any directdevelopmentfinancing from international financial institutions (IFIs), Burma receivesassistancethroughanumberofavenues.TheInternationalMonetaryFundconducts“ArticleIVconsultations”whichreviewarangeofeconomicpoliciesofitsmembercountries.StafffromtheWorldBankandADBhavejoinedtheconsultationsinthepast.ThelastconsultationwasheldinJanuary2011.129 130
TheADBhasnotprovidedany loanstoBurmasince1986-87.However,theADBhasprovidedandcontinuestoprovideotherkindsofassistancethroughseveralchannels.ThefirstistheGreaterMekongSubregion(GMS)economiccooperationprogramxxiiiinwhichtheADBplaysafacilitatingandsupportingroleinmobilizingprivatesectorinvestment.Thepurposeoftheprogramistofacilitateregionalgrowthanddevelopment.TheADBfundsBurma’sparticipation inGMS-related activities andprojects through their Regional TechnicalAssistanceGrants(RETA).xxiv
In2009theADBreleasedadiscussiondraftenergystrategyfortheGreaterMekongSub-regionentitled‘BuildingaSustainableFuture:TheGreaterMekongSubregion’. 131Thestudyconcludesthatenergy integrationforall formsofenergy includinggas is the leastcostsolutiontomeetingenergydemandintheregion.ThisisthefirstGMSenergystrategytoincludenaturalgas.Asamajorsourceofgasintheregion,Burmaisincludedinthemodel.Currentbilateral tradewithThailand ismentionedand the studyoutlines indetail thecontroversialShwegasproject,whichisdocumentedtohavealreadyresultedinhumanrightsabuses(seesection5.2).
AnassessmentofbiofuelsinBurma,supportedbytheADB’sGMS,promotesthedevelopmentofa long-termbiofuel strategywitha focuson Jatropha.A reportentitled“Statusandpotential for thedevelopmentofbiofuels and rural renewableenergyMyanmar”wasdevelopedaspartof theStrategic Framework forBiofuelDevelopment in theGreaterMekongSubregionwhichpromotesbio-fuelsasasolutiontoenergydeficiencyintheGMS.
KachinIndependenceOrganization(KIO)andthegovernmentbetweenApril2009andApril2010,encouragingdialogueandrestraint.InternationalCrisisGroup,“China’sMyanmarStrategy:Elections,EthnicPoliticsandEconomics”,UpdateBriefing,AsiaBriefingNo112,Beijing/Jakarta/Brussels,21September2010.xxii Anarrearsisadebtwhichremainsunpaid.xxiii TheGMSprogramcomprisesCambodia,thePeople’sRepublicofChina,LaoPeople’sDemocraticRepublic,Myanmar,Thailand,andVietNam.Formoreinformationvisit:http://www.adb.org/gms/xxiv From1January1968to31December2009,consultantswereinvolvedin20,087contractsforADBTAprojectsworth$2.52billion.Duringthesameperiod,consultantsfromMyanmarwereinvolvedin23contractsforADBTAprojectsworth$1.28million.ADB,“ADBandMyanmarFactSheet”,http://www.adb.org/Documents/Fact_Sheets/MYA.pdf,lastaccessed7November2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
48
(formoreinformation,seesection5.5).
AnotherGMSinitiativerelatedtoBurmaisthe‘East-WestEconomicCorridor’(EWEC)(or‘AsiaHighway’)whichisaplantoestablishalandrouteconnectingtheIndianOceanandtheSouthChinaSeathroughBurma,Thailand,Laos,andVietnam.AccordingtotheADB,themainvisionoftheEWECisto“createaneconomiccorridorthatwillstimulatethetypeofeconomicgrowththatreducespovertyandraisesthestandardsoflivingintheareascoveredby the corridor.”132 Theoriginalplanwas to complete themain infrastructurecomponentsof theprogramby2007.Todate, themajorityof infrastructurehasbeencompleted,buttheportsinbothVietnamandBurmahaveyettobefinished.TheroadbetweenThingannyinaugandMyawaddyinBurma,whichispartoftheEWEC,ismostlycompleteexceptfora40kilometerstretchthroughaconflictareainKarenState,wherethereareongoinghumanrightsabuses.133ThebuildingofthisstretchiscontroversialasitwouldprovideincreasedaccesstotheareafortheBurmesemilitary.Furthermore,theroadbisectsseveralprotectedareasinthenorthernpartoftheWesternForestComplexxxvandconstructionwouldresultinloggingofteakforests,threatenwildlifeanddestroyrareandthreatenedtropicalforestecosystems.
AspartoftheEWEC,abordereconomiczone(BEZ)isslatedtobeestablishedinMaeSotinThailandoppositeMyawaddyinKarenState.AnindustrialandexportprocessingzonealsoistobesetupinMoulmein(capitalofMonState).AccordingtotheADB’sEastWestEconomicCorridorstrategyactionplan2009,“theIndustrialEstateAuthorityofThailand(IEAT)hassupportedthecreationofa384hectareindustrialestateinMyawaddy.Two-thirdsofthatareawouldbedesignatedasanexportprocessingzone(EPZ),andelectricitywouldbesuppliedfromMaeSo[t]sincelocalsourcesareunreliable.Insupportoftheseefforts,atradecenterisintheprocessofconstruction.”134Withmanyofthebuildingscomplete,inJuly2007theThaigovernmentwasreconsideringthelaunchingofaspecialeconomiczonebetweenMaeSotandMyawaddy,butrecentconflictinMyawaddywilllikelyputafurtherdelayontheseplans.135
TheotherGMSprogramthat involvesBurma is theGMSMekongPowerGrid,which ispromotedunder the ‘RegionalPower InterconnectionandPowerTradeArrangements’.Accordingtotheplan,firstproposed in1994,aseriesofhydropowerschemes inLaos,Burma,Cambodia andYunnanProvince,China,will export electricity toThailandandVietnam.Aregionaltransmissiongridwillbebuilttoconnecttheseschemes.Thetotalcostfortransmissionandgenerationis$43billionUSD.136 137InternationalRiversresearchshowsthat“sofartheplanningprocesshasbeenpoorwithliterallynoparticipationbycivilsocietygroups,andlittleconsiderationoftheimpactofthedamsontheenvironmentorlivelihoods.Bothnational and regional electricityplanningprocesses todatehave failed tomeetinternationalstandards,suchastheprinciplesofIntegratedResourcePlanning.Asaresult,electricitydemand,inparticularinThailandandVietnamwheremuchofthedams’electricitywillbeconsumed, isover-estimatedandthepotentialcontributionthatrenewableand
xxv TheWesternForestComplexincludestheKayah-KarenMontaneRainForests,whichextendsouthintotheTenasserim(Tanintharyi)Division. TheregioncontainsmainlandSoutheastAsia’slargestremainingtropicalandsub-tropicalmoistbroadleafforests.Tohelpprotectthesespecies,theWorldWildlifeFundhasaddedtheKayah-KarenForeststoitslistoftheplanet’s200mostimportanteco-regions. http://www.earthrights.org/publication/east-west-economic-corridor
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
49
decentralizedenergy,energyefficiencyanddemandsidemanagementcouldmakeisnotfullypursued”.138TheADBsupportstheplanforregionalintegrationofpowerbyhostingregularregionalmeetingsbetweengovernments,fundingstudies,andfinancingseveraltransmissionlines.139While,notdirectlyfundedbytheADBthemasterplanincludestheTasangdaminShanstate.ThemaininvestorsareEGATInternationalandtheThreeGorgesGroupCorporation(seesection5.1).
Besides theGMS, theADB is involved in theBayofBengal Initiative forMulti-SectoralTechnical andEconomicCooperation (BIMSTEC)whichconsistsofBangladesh,Bhutan,India,Burma,Nepal,SriLankaandThailand. TheextentofassistancefromtheADBtoBurmaaspartofthisprogramisnotclear.140However,BurmaiscurrentlythefocalpointfortheenergyandagriculturecommitteesandthelatestMinisterialMeetingofBIMSTECwasheldinNaypidawinJanuary2011. 141
Aregionaleconomicco-operationstrategythattheADBhelpeddesignandsupportundertheAyeyawady-ChaoPhraya-MekongEconomicCooperationStrategy(ACMECS)pavedthewayforaplanforThaicontractfarmerstomanageandcultivatemorethan7millionhectaresoflandinBurmaforsugarcane,oilpalm,cassava,beansandrubber.142AmemorandumofunderstandingsignedinDecember2005,designatedfourareasinKarenandMonStates.Thecontractfarmswerealltobeoverseenbythestate-runThaiNationalEconomicandSocialDevelopmentBoard.143In2006,29ThaiinvestorswereallowedundertheoriginalMoUtoexporttheirproductstoThailandduty-free.144AgribusinessandtheThaigovernmentwerethekeydriversoftheproject,howeverin2010theMinistryofAgriculturetoldtheFocusontheGlobalSouthxxvithatcontractfarminginBurmawastheleastsuccessfulamongstthe3neighboringcountriesbecausetheBurmesegovernmentdidn’twantThaitraderstotradewithethnicgroupsalongthebordersodidnotfacilitatetheissuingofCertificateofOriginforthem.145AccordingtoFocusontheGlobalSouth,investorsweremostlysmallandmedium traders thathadalreadybeendoing tradeacross theborder in TakandKanchanaburi.The0tariffbenefittedthemasdidthelegalizationoftheongoingtrade.ThebulkofproducebroughtintoThailandfromBurmaduring2006-2008underACMECSwerepeanut,mungbeanandsesame.Onlyonesugarcompanyinvestedingrowingsugarcaneinabout6000raioflandandthatwasthebiggestagribusinessinvestoravailableinreports(inThai),exceptforCP(corngrowing,feedmills,livestock)whichhasbeeninBurmaforalmost20years.146
Asmentionedearlier,UNEPandtheADBcommissionedthe2006theMyanmarEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessmentwaspublishedaspartofabroaderprogramcalledtheNationalPerformanceAssessment and Strategic Environment FrameworkofGreaterMekongSubregion (GMS). It provides someuseful baseline data covering forest resources,biodiversity,landdegradation,managementofwaterresources,wastemanagement,airpollutionfrommobilesourceandclimatechange. 147
Morerecently,boththeADBandWorldBankgavesupportforreliefandreconstructionafterCycloneNargisthroughASEAN.Afterthecyclonehit,ASEAN,theUN,andtheBurmesegovernmentsetuptheTripartiteCoreGrouptoco-ordinateneedsassessmentsandreceive
xxvi FocusontheGlobalSouthisaprogramofprogressivedevelopmentpolicyresearchandpracticethatworksonregionalandglobalpolicyanalysis,micro-macrolinkingandadvocacyworkwww.focusweb.org
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
50
aidfromdonors.TheADBandWorldBanksentanumberofexpertstoprovidetechnicalassistance for the initialneedsassessmentofcyclonehitareas.Basedon theresultingreport‘ThePost-NargisJointAssessment”(PONJA),theUNissuedacalltotheinternationaldonorcommunitytomakecontributionsof$1billionUSDforrecoveryworkinBurmaoverthenextthreeyears.TheWorldBankgaveagrantof$850,000USDfor“disasterassessmentandrecoveryactivities.”148CivilsocietygroupsbasedontheThai-BurmeseborderraisedconcernsthatwhilethePONJAreportdetailedthe impactof thecycloneandresultingrecoveryneedsinmanysectorsandcyclone-affectedareas,itwasnotcomprehensiveorobjectiveasthegovernmentlimitedthescopeandassessmentofthereport.149InFebruary2009,theTripartiteCoreGrouppublishedafollow-upreport“Post-NargisResponseandPreparednessPlan,”whichestimated$691millionUSDwouldbeneededfor“emergencyreliefandearlyrecoverytowardsmedium-termrecovery.”150 151
InDecember2009,at the invitationofUNESCAP (UnitedNationsEconomicandSocialCommissionforAsiaandthePacific),formerWorldBankChiefEconomistJosephStiglitzconductedatripinBurmatoadviseoneconomicpolicy.Thefocuswasontheruraleconomyand sustainable agricultural development.At theendof the triphemetwith seniorgovernmentofficials,policymakers,developmentpractitionersand scholarsatESCAPsSecondDevelopmentPartnershipRoundtableandDevelopmentForuminNaypidaw.Thefourmainrecommendationswere:examiningcreditpoliciesandincreasingfarmersaccessto credit, social protection for farmers (including crop insurance and employmentguarantees),movingfromalaborintensivesystemtoamoretechnologyandknowledgebased system (which requires education), and transparency in financial systemsandallocatingnational revenue towhere it ismostneeded.152 Stiglitzhighlightedgas andhydropowerandpotentialandactualrevenuesources,andpointedouttheneedforwellfunctioninginstitutionsascriticaltosuccess.153 154Criticspointedtothedecadesofeconomicmismanagement;lackofcomprehensiveplanning;andtheneedforpoliticalandspaceandwillingnessforgenuineeconomicreformbeforeeconomicpolicychangesaremade.SeanTurnell,AssociateProfessorinEconomicsatMacquarieUniversityinSydneypointedoutthatisimpossiblefortheeconomytobepartiallyopentoreform.155Furthermore,neoliberaleconomicreformssuchasthosewhichStiglitzandtheWorldBankadvocatearepromotingunconditionalprivatelandrightswhichcanbeboughtandsoldonalandmarket,whichhaveinothercountriesthroughoutthehistoryofprivatizationhurtsmallholderfarmers.
5. THREATS TO ENVIRONMENT AND LIVELIHOODS
ThemajorityofBurma’sincomecomesfromsellingoffnaturalresources,includingbillionsofdollarsfromgasandhydropowerdevelopment. Investmentcomesfromcountrieswithintheregion–mostsignificantlyChina,IndiaandThailand.Malaysia,Singapore,Japan,VietnamandKoreaarealsokeyinvestorslookingtoincreaseinvestmentsaftertheelections.Theseresourceextractiveinvestmentsdamagetheenvironmentandthreatenlocalresource-basedlivelihoods,particularlyinethnicareas.
In2010TransparencyInternationalratedBurmaalongsideAfghanistaninsecondlastplace(onlySomaliawasregardedasworse)initscorruptionperceptionsindex.156NolawsexistinBurmathatdemandpublicparticipationortransparencyindecision-makingandfinancing
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
51
ofpublicprojects,protectfarmersfromlarge-scaleinvestmentthatleadstolandconfiscation,requiresocialandenvironmentalimpactassessments,providelaborregulationsforworkerson theprojects,orallow famer’sassociationsorunions. Lawsareusednot toprotectpeople’srights,buttoservetheeconomicinterestsoftheBurmesegovernmentprimarilythroughextractingwealth.
Therehasbeenacontinuingincreaseinmilitarization,largescaleresourceextractionandinfrastructuredevelopmentinBurma.Thesefactorsarecausingwidespreaddisplacementandhumanrightsabusesthroughoutethnicareas.ThisispartofasystematicplanofBurma’sgovernmentattemptingtogaincontrolovernaturalresource-richethnicareastocreatewealth,andtoconsolidateitspoliticalpowerbase.
AnalysisofdevelopmentinBurmashouldthereforealsotakeintoseriousconsiderationtheroleofmilitarizationconnectedtodevelopment,andtheimplicationsithasforboththesurroundinglandandpopulationscontainedtherein.Securingresource-richlandsforlarge-scaleresourceextractionprojectsorinfrastructuredevelopmentincreasesBurmesemilitary andpolice presencewhich has serious consequences for local populations.Oftentimescommunitiesareimplicatedinforcedlaborandportering,forciblyrelocatedwithoutcompensation,lossoftraditionalfarmlandsandtheirlivelihoods–withoutanyemploymentorothereconomicbenefits.Militarizationisnotonly linkedwithso-calleddevelopmentprojects,butalsowithconservation.AsthecasestudywiththeHugawngValleyTigerReserveclearlyillustrates,declaringareasasconservationzonesalsoleadstomilitary securitizationof the surroundingareaandpopulation.Bothdevelopmentandconservation result in theBurmesemilitary-state controlling territory, introducingnewgovernanceregimesthatrestrictlocalpopulations’freedomsandwellbeing.
Themarketmayopenupfurthertoforeigninvestmentaftertheelections,butwithoutanyprotectionsofferedtothosemostvulnerable,therecouldbedireconsequencesforBurma’snaturalresources,environmentandruralpopulations,particularlyinethnicceasefireandnon-ceasefireareaswherethemajorityofnaturalresourcesremain.Recentlytherehasbeenaheightened interest fromneighboringcountries to invest further inBurma.Forexample,inSeptember2010,theChinesegovernmentagreedtogivea30-yearinterest-freeloanof30billionYuan($4.2billionUSD)toBurmaforeconomicdevelopmenttohelpfundhydropower projects, road construction, railwaydevelopment and informationtechnologydevelopment.157OnNovember2,2010,5daysbeforetheelectionsinBurma,Thailand’slargestconstructioncompanyItalian-ThaiDevelopmentwasgrantedalong-termconcessiontobuildadeep-seaportinsouth-easternBurma.TheprojectincludesaneightlanehighwaythroughaconflictareawheretheKNLAoperatesinTennasserimDivision,connectingtoKanchunaburiineasternThailand.158TheprojectispartoftheSouth-Southeconomic corridor linking theproposeddeep-seaport toThailandandMalaysia. Thecontractoralsoplansforittobea logisticsandtradinghubfortheregion,althoughfinancehasnotyetbeensecuredfortheproject.
India’sbilateralrelationshipwithBurmaisescalating,withtradeup26%andreaching$1.19billionUSDin2010.159Tiesbetweenthetwocountriesweretightenedduringa5-dayvisitbyBurma’smilitarychiefSeniorGeneralThanShwetomeetofficialsinDelhiinJuly2010.AccordingtoBurmesegovernmentsources,thevisitwasofficially“religiousinnature”but
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
52
alsotodiscussbordersecurityandsignagreementsoneconomicco-operation.160 161StateownedIndiancompaniesarecurrentlyinvestinginandplanningtoinvestinanumberofprojectsincludingthegasandhydropowersector,communicationsandtechnologyandtheKaladanMulti-ModalTransportProject.xxvii
5.1 Large Dams
Burma’slargelyruralpopulationreliesheavilyonriversandstreamsfortheirlivelihoodsandculture.Thesearenowunderseriousthreatfromdamdevelopment.Anestimated48hydropowerprojectsarecurrentlybeingplanned,constructedoralreadyexistinBurmaonmajorriversincludingtheSalween/Thanlwin,Irrawaddy,Chindwin,andSittaung,aswellastheirtributaries. 162 xxviii Basedlargelyinborderandethnicregions,25ofthoseprojectsinvolvemegadams,willcostmorethananestimatedUS$35billiondollars163,willproduceanestimated40,000MWintotal,andwillbringinrevenueestimatedatUS$4billiondollarsannually. Thesehydropowerdamsareexpectedtoexportupto90%oftheircombinedgenerationtoneighboringcountriesinsteadofsupplyinglocalpopulationswhofaceseriousongoingenergyshortages.164Mega-damshavealreadybeenbuiltinseveralethnicareas,suchas the LawpitaHydropowerProject inKarenni Stateand LowerPaunglaungandKengtawngdamsinShanstate.165 166
ThereisarushamongstBurma’sneighborstobuildandoperatehydropowerprojects.Inthefirstsevenmonthsofthe2010–2011fiscalyearonethirdoftotalforeigninvestmentinBurmawentintothehydropowersector.167CorporationsandgovernmentsfromChina,India,ThailandandBangladeshhavesignedmemorandawiththeBurmesegovernment. A contractorfromSwitzerland,ColencoPowerEngineeringhassignedanagreementtoprovideconsultingservicesforin-houseengineeringservicesonhydropowerprojectsinMyanmar(includingtheTamanthiDaminWesternSagaingDivisionandtheUpperPaunglaungdaminShanstate). 168 169Therearestillanumberofprojectsthatitishardtoobtaininformationon.Buildingdams insideBurmaoffersanopportunity toacquire cheapelectricity forneighboringcountries,whileinvestorsarenotaccountableforthenegativeeconomic,socialandenvironmental impactsof thedambuilding. Investment revenue from the saleofelectricitywill continue to provide financial and political support to the Burmesegovernment.170Manyoftheproposeddamsarelocatedincivilwarzonesinethnicareaswherethereisincreasedmilitarizationandvillagersfacewidespreadhumanrightsviolationsincludingforcedrelocationandlabor,andinsomecases,torture,rapeandexecution.171
xxviiThe Indiangovernment signedanagreementwith theBurmesemilitarygovernment for theKaladanMulti-ModalTransitTransportProjectinApril2008.TheprojectwillconnecttheeasternIndianseaportofKolkatawithSittweportinArakanStatebysea;itwillthenlinkSittwe(thecapitalofArakanstate)totheland-lockedregionofMizoraminnortheasternIndiaviariverandroad.ItisanticipatedthatthetransportsystemwillremainfullyownedbytheBurmesestate,butbeprimarilyusedbyIndiancompaniestoincreasetrade in agricultural productswith Southeast Asia and link the land-lockedMizoram region to thesea.ConstructionoftheportatSittwehasalreadybegunandiftheprojectproceedsasplanneditwillhaveextensiveimpactonlocallivelihoods,andextremeenvironmentaldamage.Aperceivedneedforhigherlevelsof security in areas surrounding theKaladanProject, aswell as atother locationsdesignated for largedevelopmentprojects(hydropowerandgas/oil)hasresultedinasignificantriseinthemilitarypresenceinWesternBurmaandArakanStateinparticularwww.arakanrivers.net.xxviiiWhilethereare25damsdocumentedbyBurmaRiversNetwork(BRN)membersintheBRN“SaveBurma’sRivers”briefingavailableathttp://www.burmariversnetwork.org/resources/publications/13/499.html,ifallplannedandconstructeddamsinBurmaarecounted,thenumberismuchlarger.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
53
Asaresultofdam-buildinghundredsofthousandsofpeoplewillbeleftwithouttheirland,homesandlivelihoods,andbecomeinternallydisplacedormigratetoneighboringcountries.Thousandshavealreadybeenforciblydisplacedwithoutcompensationfrommilitarization. 172
Thedamswillhaveaseriousimpactonfoodsecurityandhealthvulnerability.Refugeesandmigrantworkerswill struggle for their survival inneighboringcountries. Internallydisplacedvillagerswillbeforcedtofindlandtofarmandothersourcesoffoodinsurroundingforests.Thedamswillalsodecreasefoodsecuritythroughtheirnegativeimpactonfisheriesandriverbankfarms.Thereareconcernsabouthealthvulnerabilityinacountrywithoneof theworsthealthsystems in theworld.Directhealthconcerns including increases indiseasesuchasmalaria,dengueandlymphaticfilariasis (asdamreservoirsprovidebreedinggroundsformosquitoes)andtoxicreleasesindamswhichareclosetominingsites.173
ManyofthedamsinBurmathreaten internationally-recognizedbiodiversityyetalmostnoneof the siteshavebeenassessed forenvironmental impacts, apart froma fewasrequestedby foreign investors tomerely rubberstamp theproject.One studyof thebiodiversityoftheWeigyidamareaontheSalweenRiverdocumented194plantand200animalspecies,including42endangeredspecies.TheMyitsoneDamattheconfluenceoftheIrrawaddyRiverinKachinStatewillfloodanarealargerthanSingaporeinoneoftheworld’shottest“hotspots”ofbiodiversity,displacingover15,000people.Damslocatedinbiodiverseareaswillfloodrichlowlandareaswherehundredsofuniquecultivatedspeciescouldbelostforever. 174
5.1.1 Dam projects: A closer look
Irrawaddy Myitsone Dam
TheplannedIrrawaddyMyitsonedamprojectislocatedattheconfluenceoftheMaliandN’MaiRivers,which formsthestartof the IrrawaddyRiverproper inKachinState.TheMyitsonewill displace15,000people,mostly ethnic Kachin, anddestroyMali-N’Maiconfluence,which theKachin regard as their cultural heartland.175 Thedam is beingconstructedbyChina’sstate-ownedChinaPowerInvestmentCorporation(CPI)andBurma’sAsiaWorldCompany.Thedamwillproduce6,000MWofelectricity.SixotherdamsarealsoplannedtobebuiltontheMaliandN’MaiRivers.176MostoftheelectricityproducedbythedamprojectswillbesoldtoChina.
AseriesofbombblastshappenedneartheMyitsonedamsitesinApril2010.xxixBy25January2011,50familiessurroundingthedamsitehadbeenforciblyrelocatedfromtheirhouses.Althoughmore familiesare set tobe forcibly relocated tomakeway for thedam, it isuncertainatthispointwhatthefinalnumberwillbe.177SecurityfortheprojectisbeingprovidedbytheBurmesemilitaryandincreasedeffortsarebeingmadebythemilitarytocontrolthearea. 178Sincethebombingstherehasbeenrestrictedmovementinandaroundthedamsiteandithasbeenhardtoobtaininformation.Followingtheopeningceremony
xxix No-oneclaimedresponsibilityforthebombings,howeverafarmerviewedbymanyasascapegoatwasarrested.OnehypothesisisthatitwastheworkoftheKachinIndependenceArmy(KIA),whichtookactionasapartoftheirrefusaltobecomearegime-ledborderguardforce.AnotherhypothesisisthatitcouldhavebeenanactoftheBurmesegovernmenttosetuptheKIA.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
54
tobuildthedamheldinDecember2009,thecapacityratingofthedamwasincreasedfrom3,600MWto6,000MW.
Ithasbeenestimatedthatthedamwillsubmergeabout766squarekilometersofold-growthrainforestsituatedintheMizoram-Manipur-Kachinrainforestregion,oneoftheworld’srichbiodiversityhotspotsandfocusareasforconservation.179Astheestimationofsubmergedareawasmadebeforethemassivecapacityratingincrease,totalsubmergedareamaybemuchgreaternow.TheCentralIrrawaddyRiverBasinisalsoastrategicstagingandwinteringdestinationformigratorywaterfowlfromTibetandotherregionsnorthoftheHimalayas.Thedamwilllikelycauseadecreaseinbothwaterqualityandfishpopulations,possiblycausingtheextinctionofbirdsfoundnowhereelseonearthandputtinggreaterstressonthecriticallyendangeredIrrawaddydolphin.180Thesituationisfurthercompoundedbythereservoirdischargeofaccumulatedmercuryfromgoldminingoperationsinthearea.Also,thedamwillchangenutrientflowstotheIrrawaddyDelta,where60percentofBurma’sriceisproduced.181
Shweli River Dams
InShanState,aMoUhasbeensignedbetweenaChinaandBurmatoconstructathree-tierdamcascadealongtheShweliRiver.TheShweli1wascompletedinlate2008.TheprojectisownedbyaChineseconsortiumthatincludestheYunnanMachineryEquipmentImportandExportCompanyLimitedandasubsidiaryofChinaSouthernpowerGridCorporation(CSG).ThedamwasbuiltbyChina’sSinohydroCorporation.HundredsofvillagerswereforcedtolaborfortheprojectwithoutpaymentandlocalwomenwereforciblymarriedtotheBurmaArmytroopsthatenteredtheareatosecurethedam.Beforetheproject’sstart,therewerenorestrictionsonvillagermovement.However,newBurmaarmycamps‘securing’thedamareahavelimitedvillageraccesstotheirfarmlandsandteaplantations.Villageraccesstoelectricityfromtheprojectisuncertainasisaffordabilitytovillagersifpowerbecomesavailable.Twootherdamsareplanneddownstream.182
Salween River Dams
OnBurma’ssectionoftheSalweenRiver,sevendamsarecurrentlyproposed,theTasang,KunLong,NongPa,Ywarthit,Hatgyi,Weigyi,andDagwin.TheproposedSalweendamsarealllocatedinconflictareaswheremilitaryfightingstilltakesplace.Dozensofvillageswillbedirectlyimpactedand/orrelocatedfromthedam’sfloodplain.Inaddition,theHatgyiandYwarthitdamsare locatedclosetofault lines.183 InaphenomenonknownasRiverInducedSeismicity, it isalsopossiblefordamstocauseearthquakes.184OftheSalweenDams,thetwomostadvancedaretheHatgtyiinKarenstateandtheTasanginShanstate.BothofthesedamsareintheThaigovernmentspowerdevelopmentplan(PDP).
AnMOUforthelargestoftheSalweenDams,theTasang(7,110MW)wassignedinNovember2010.InvestmentwasincreasedfromUS$6BilliontoUS$10Billion.ThemaininvestorschangedfromMDXThailandtoEGATInternationalandThreeGorgesGroupCorporation.185 TheTasangDamwillsubmerge870km2oflandinShanState.Between1996and1998decadesofmilitaryconflictintheareagavewaytotheforcedrelocationof60,000peoplein thedamareaandareasadjacent to thedam.Anestimated14,800of thosepeople
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
55
comprisetheKengKamculturalgroupwhichtherealizationofthedamprojectthreatenstowipeout.OngoingrampantloggingintheTasangDamprojectareaanditssurroundstoserviceChineseandThaihardwoodmarketsfurtherthreatenthefutureoflocalecologiesandthepeoplewhodependonthem.186
InApril2010,anMOAwassignedwiththeBurmaMinistryofElectricPower,andChinaandThailandfortheHatgyidaminKarenstate(1360MW).187ThedamisbeingbuiltbytheEnergyGeneratingAuthority of Thailand (EGAT) and funded by China’s SinoHydroCorporation.ThesigningoftheMOAcamedespiteareportbyacommittee(setupbyThaiPrimeMinisterAbhisitafterpressurefromcivilsocietyto investigatehumanrightsandenvironmentalviolationsinthedamarea)statedthatthegovernmentshouldinstructEGATtoconductanEIAinThailandincompliancewithThailegalstandards.ApreviousEIAwasdeemedincomplete.188Therehasbeen increasedmilitarizationaroundthedamsite. InJune2009,anoffensiveinKarenstateclosetotheHatgyidamsitedroveover3500Karenrefugees into Thailand. Thefightingwas linked to theneed for the State Peace andDevelopmentCouncil(SPDC)andDKBA(abreakawaygroupoftheKarenNationalUnion)togainterritorialcontroloftheareasclosetodamsite.AftertheNovember7,2010electioninBurma, conflictagainescalated inKaren state.Manyunitsof theDemocraticKarenBuddhistArmywhorefusedtobecomeaborderguardforceandareheadquarteredadjacenttotheHatgyidamsite,arenowactivelyfightingtheregime’stroops,andtogetherwiththeKNU,nowcontrollargeswathesofterritoryinthevicinityofthedam,andelsewhereinKarenState.Approximately30,000refugeeshavefledacrosstheborderintoThailandsincetheNovember2010election,includinghundredsfromdirectlyupstreamofthedamsite.189 190
Dams past and present
KarenniState’sLawpitapowerplantandconnectedMobyeandDatawchadamsbuilttosupplyelectricitytoRangoon,Burma’scapitalatthetime,representsthefirstlargescalehydropowerprojectbuiltinBurma.Powerplantrelateddevelopmentandmilitarizationoftheareasaw114villagesflooded191;12,000peopledisplaced;anestimated18,000landminesplanted;a localpopulationsubjected to forced labor, sexualviolence,andextrajudicialkillings;andprioritizedwaterschedulingleadingtocropdestruction.Eightypercentofthelocalpopulationstillhasnoaccesstoelectricity.192
ThenearbyUpperPaunglaungDam,beingbuilttoboostthepowersupplytoBurma’snewcapital,Naypyidawxxx,isagainabusinglocalpeople’srights“inthesameway,astheyfindthemselvesdispossessedoftheirlandsandtheirresourcesbeingsiphonedoffatgunpoint”.193 Forcedresettlementwithoutinformedconsentorcompensation,andthesubmersionoffertilefarmlandandforestsfaceslocalpeoplesandspecies.Aswithotherlargedamprojects,uniquelocalculturesandethnicitiesarealsothreatenedwithextinction.Connectedabusesalreadydocumentedintheregionincludeforcedlabor,forcedconscription,restrictionsonlanduseandrenewedconflict.194
xxx TheLowerPaunglaungDamcompletedin2005iscurrentlysupplyingelectricitytoNaypidaw.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
56
Burma Rivers Network, Dams in Burma, “Save Burma’s Rivers”, http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/resources/publications/13/499.html
(Note:thismapdoesnotincludealltheplannedandconstructed48damssuchastheplannedLaymro,SaiDun,ThaHtayChaungandAnnChaungdamsinArakanstateandtheplannedPawnandThabetdamsinKarennistate)
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
57
5.2 Oil and Gas Extraction
Burmaisrichinoilandgasresources,whicharelocatedbothon-andoff-shore.Todaymanyinvestors,muchlikeinthehydropowersector,aregainingaccesstotheseenergyresources,includinggovernmentsandcorporationsfromChina,India,Thailand,SouthKorea,FranceandUSA.ChinesecompaniesarethefastestgrowinginvestorsinBurma’soilandgassector.195
ForeigninvestmentprovidescrucialsupporttotheBurmesegovernmentandincreasedenergy security for countries suchasChinabut local communitiesgainnobenefitsorcompensation.
ExportofnaturalgasisthemostlucrativeindustryinBurma,currentlyaccountingfor12.5%ofBurma’sGDP. 196AccordingtotheInternationalMonetaryFund,ithas,howevercontributedtolessthanonepercentofthebudgetrevenue,withmuchoftherevenuereportedlyneverenteringBurma.197Gasaccountsforover70%ofallforeignexchangereserves,withsalestotalingaround$3billionUSDannually.198Hadthisincomegoneintothestatebudgetitwouldhaveaccountedfor57%ofthetotalbudgetrevenue.199
Thefirstforeigninvestmentprojectafter1988whenthegovernmentbegantopartiallyliberalizetheeconomywasthedevelopmentoftheYadanagasfieldintheAndamanSeaandtheconstructionofagaspipelinethroughceasefireandconflictareasinMonStateandTenasserimDivision in easternBurma. Theprojectwasmanagedby themilitarygovernment’sstateownedcompany,theMyanmarOilandGasEnterprise,inpartnershipwithTotal(France),Unocal(US)andPTTExplorationandProduction(PTTEPThailand).MostofthegasisboughtbythePetroleumAuthorityofThailand(PTT)andrelativelylittleofthegasorrevenuegeneratedbenefitspeopleofBurmaorthecountry’sownenergysecurity.200 Burma’sgasandoilisbeingexportedwhileatthesametimemostpeopleinBurmalackenergyforelectricityorcooking.201
Theconstructionofthepipelineinthelate1990sresultedinhumanrightsabusesandmuchenvironmentaldestruction.Theseincludedmilitarizationofthearea;forcedrelocationofcommunitieswithoutcompensation;confiscationofagriculturallands;forcedlaborandforcedporteringtoconstructmilitarycampsandmilitaryinfrastructure;sexualviolence;andclearingoflandandroadconstructionalongthepipelinecorridorandpotentialsupplyroutes.Unocal,theUS-basedcompanymanagingtheprojectatthattimeinpartnershipwithFrance-basedTotalandtheBurmesemilitaryregime,facedlawsuitsforcomplicityinhuman rightsabuses through theAlienTortClaimsAct. Inearly2006Chevron (whichabsorbedUnocal)agreedtomulti-milliondollarsettlements,buthumanrightsabusesbypipelinesecurityforcessuchasextrajudicialkillings,forcedlaboranduncompensatedlandconfiscationsareongoingandweredocumentedinlate2009.202 203ItwasrecentlyreportedthattherehasbeenincreasedmilitarizationaroundthepipelineareainaceasefireareainMonstate,duetotensionsoverwhetherornottheNewMonStateArmywillagreetobecomeamilitary-governmentledborderguardforce.204
This investment innaturalgasextractioncameinatacrucialtimeforthegovernment,whichinthelate1990swaseconomically isolatedbytheinternationalcommunity.Thepipelinehascontinuedtoprovideasignificantcontributiontothegovernment’slong-termfinancialviability.ArecentreportbyEarthRightsInternationalestimatedthatfrom1998-
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
58
2009,theYadanaProjectgeneratedatotalofover$9billionUSD—overhalfofwhich,about$4.6billionUSD,wentdirectlytothemilitarygovernment.205
Thereisnoindependentoversightforrevenuesfromtheoilandgassector.TherevenuesarerecordedbyBurma’spublicaccounts inBurmeseKyatat theofficialexchangerate,whichover-valuesthecurrencybyupto200times.AnearlierreporthadrevealedthatportionsofgaspipelinerevenuewereintwoofSingapore’slargestoffshorebanks,andthattheseaccountscouldbeusedforanypurpose.206Theproject iswidelyregardedasthesinglelargestofficialsourceofincomefortheregimewhichspendsoverhalfofgovernmentspendingonthemilitary.207 208Gasrevenuesaremostcertainlybeingusedtopurchaseweaponsandmilitaryequipment,andmaybefundingthemilitarygovernment’sallegednuclearweaponsprogramwhichincludesanestimated$3billionUSDspentonanetworkofmilitarytunnels.209
TheregimeissettoearnmorewiththeShweGasproject,whichaloneisprojectedtoearnatleast$1billionUSDayearfortheregimeforthenext30years.210InArakanState,westernBurma,plansforonshoreandoffshorenaturalgasandoilproduction,constructionofa2,800kmpipelinecorridortoaccommodatedualoilandgaspipelinesstretchingtoYunnanProvinceinChina,andthedevelopmentofadeepseaportarenowunderway.GasfieldswerediscoveredbyDaewooInternationalLtd.,aSouthKorea-basedcompany,offthecoastofArakanStateintheBayofBengalin2004.Thethreefields,collectivelylabeledShwe,theBurmesewordforgold,haveanestimated4.5-9.1trillioncubicfeetofgas.211Thelarge-scalenaturalgasprojectisbeingdevelopedwithDaewooInternationalLtd.(51percentstake)inconsortiumwiththeKoreaGasCorporation(KOGAS),ONGCVideshLtd.ofIndia,GAILLtd.ofIndia,asajointventurewiththeMyanmarOilandGasEnterprise(MOGE).212 TheChinesegovernmentsignedanagreementwiththeBurmesegovernmentinmid2009whichmadeChinathesolebuyerofthegasreserves.213ThepipelinesarebeingbuiltbyChina’slargestoilandgasproducer–theChinaNationalPetroleumCorporation(CNPC).Thesaleofthedepositswillmostlikelybecomethemilitarygovernment’ssinglelargestsourceofforeignincome.
Thegaspipelineisscheduledtobefullyoperationalin2013.Chinaisalsosettobenefitfromtheoil transportpipeline,whichwillenableoil tobe importedtoChinafromtheMiddleEastandAfrica.The2,380kmcrudeoilpipelinewillrunfromMadayIslandintheBayofBengaloffthecoastofArakantoKunming,China.Itisestimatedtocost$1.5billionUSDandwilltransport12billioncubicmetersofcrudeoilperyeartoChina.TheChinaNationalPetroleumCorporationstartedtheconstructionofaseaportonMadayIslandinOctober2009.Theconstructionoftheseaportisexpectedtobefinishedwithintwotothreeyears,andtheportisslatedtobebusierthanChina’sShanghaiseaport.China’scrudeoiltankerswilldockthereontheirwayfromtheMiddleEastandAfrica.214
ExperiencefromthedevelopmentoftheYadanaandYetagungaspipelinesineasternBurmademonstratethatpipelineconstructionandmaintenanceistiedtoaseriesofhumanrightsabuses.215Thehumanrightsandenvironmentalimpactsarealreadybeingfelt.Inmid-2009therewerereportsofforcedlandconfiscation,relocationsandhumanrightsabusesdueto the constructionof China’s crudeoil port atMaday Island inArakan State.216Nocompensationwasprovidedtolocalresidentsforthelandthatwastakenfortheproject.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
59
MorehumanrightsabusesinwesternBurmaandalongthepipeline’sroutetoChinaarelikelyinthenearfuture.Over8,500soldiersarecurrentlystationedalongthepipelineroute,anditisexpectedthatasconstructionprogressesmoresoldierswillmoveintotheareaincluding‘specialbattalions’withexperiencein‘pipelinesecurity’operations.InJune2010BurmesejuntaissuedalettertohundredsofvillagersinwesternBurmaorderingthemtovacatetheirland.217
Over400millionpeopleliveinthecatchmentareaoftheBayofBengal,subsistingatorbelowthepovertyline.Theseprojectsarethreateningthelivelihoodsofthousandsoflocalfarmersandfishermenanddestructionoftheenvironment.MiningoperationsforseaportconstructioninlateOctober2009aroundMadayislandkilledhundredsoffishanddestroyedimportantlocalfishinggroundswherelocalpeoplehavebeenfishingforcenturies.218Oilspills fromtanker traffic,andoilexplorationandproduction threatenfisheriesand thelargelyintactecosystemoftheArakancoast.Naturalgasproductionandtransportcouldresultintheleakageofchemicalsandpotentialgasblowoutswhichcauseenvironmentaldamage.219
Figure 3 Daewoo clearing pipeline route for the offshore gas terminal, Arakan state. SGM, 2011.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
60
5.3 Mining
Burmahasanumberofrichmineralresourcedepositsincludingtungsten,tin,zinc,silver,copper,lead,coal,goal,andindustrialminerals.220Antimony,limestone,andmarbledepositsalsodotthelandscape.221Gemstonesincludingdiamonds,rubies,andsapphirescanalsobefoundinBurma’ssoil.Burmaisalsothelargestjadeproducerintheworld.222NinetypercentofChina’sjadeite,thehighestqualityofjadeintheworldandonlyfoundinBurma,comesfromtheminesatHpakant,KachinState.223AftersigningaceasefirewiththeKachinIndependenceOrganization(KIO)in1994,theBurmesegovernmentassumedcontroloftheselucrativejadecaches.224
TheBurmesegovernmentmaintainsthat‘allnaturallyoccurringmineralsfoundeitheronorunderthesoilofany landonthecontinentalshelfaredeemedtobeownedbythestate’.225TheminingsectorisdirectedbytheMyanmarMinistryofMineswhosevariousbranches investigatepotentialmineraldeposits andgrantmining concessions to closepartnersincludingregionalcommanders,theBurmeseprivatesector,andsomeceasefiregroups.Since1988,whentheeconomywasopeneduptoforeigninvestment,theMinistryofMinesbegantoencouragelocalandforeigninvestmentintheminingindustry.226VerylittleinformationonthehundredsofofficialandunofficialminingconcessionsgivenbyBurma’sMinistryofMinestolocalandforeigninvestors(mostlyChineseenterprises)inthepast20yearsisavailabletothepublic.Manyoftheseminingcompanieshavefriendlytiestonon-statearmedgroupsallacrossthenation.227OnereasonthattheextentofChina’sstakeinBurma’sminingsectorisincrediblycomplicatedtogaugeisthatasizeableportionofminingoperationsinthecountryaresmallerinscale,remote,anddifficulttoaccess.228
Itisdifficulttoobtaindataontheincomethatthegovernmentreceivesfromminingexports.Forexample,officially,Burmaannuallyexports$60millionworthofpearls,sapphires,jade,andrubies,mostlytoThailandandChina.229However,someexpertsbelievethatgovernmentfiguresdownplaytheactualmagnitudeofthegemtradebyafactorof10.230
Duetothelackoflawsandregulationsprotectingtheenvironmentagainsttheimpactsofmining,miningposesagravethreattothemountainousregionsinthenorthanddelicatecoastalareaswheretiniscollected. Upuntilabout20yearsago,miningoperationswererelatively small in scale and causeminimal impacts to theenvironment.231 Traditionalmethodsofminingforgold,gems,andothervaluablemineralsrelymostlyonshovels,picks,pansandscreen.232Forthepasttwodecades,therehasbeenashifttowardslarge-scale—andmuchmoreenvironmentallydestructivetechniques.233
GoldminingisparticularlyrampantinKachinState,innorthernBurma,especiallyalongtheIrrawaddyandChindwinRivers.234In2007,theKachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG)reportedthefollowingimpactsofindustrialmininginKachinState:
Land,includingforests,isindiscriminatelyclearedforhydraulicandpitminingoperations.Pitmininggutstheremainingsoil,leavingitpock-marked…whilehydraulicminingblastsawaysoil[,]causingerosiononriverbanks.Wastesfromtheminingprocess,includingmercurycontaminatedrocksandsoil,
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
61
arediscardedthroughoutthe[demolished]landscape.Grazinggroundsandhabitats for animals aredestroyed aswell as anyplant life that could[previously]growintheareas.235
Copperminingisthemostdestructiveformofmining.OpenpitminingwhichisusedinBurmarequiresthatthelandscapebestrippedofsurroundingforestsandvegetationandnaturaldrainagebedrasticallyaltered.Thisgreatlydestabilizesthetopography.236Burma’slargestmineistheMonywaProject,anopenpitcopperminelocatedinSagaingDivisonincentralBurma.LocalpeopleatMonywacannolongerfarmtheirlandduetohighlevelsofsulphuricacidinthesoilandwater,pushingsometoartisanalminingxxxi,andcreatingalocaleconomicshift—whichhasoccurredelsewhereinBurma—fromasubsistence-basedtoacash-basedeconomy.237Theshifttoartisanalminingfurtheradverselyaffectstheenvironmentandincreasesinflation,makingitdifficultforpeopletomeettheirbasicneeds.Itisalsonoteconomicallysustainableasitrequiresnocapitalinputsandthusnoaddedreturnoninputs;itisavehiclefortheperpetuationofpoverty.238
TheMonywaminecomprisesoffourcoppersulfidedeposits.Thefirstthreepitsarenearingdepletion.InJune2010themanagingdirectorofstate-ownedcompanyUMEHL(UnionofMyanmarEconomicHoldingsLimited)signedadealwithChineseweaponsproducerNorincoInvestors to invest in the last copperdeposit, ‘Letpadaung’.xxxii TheLetpadaungcopperdeposithasbeenestimatedtoholdasmuchas3,800,000tonsofcopperenoughtoproduce125,000tonsayearfor25years.239
AsofNovember2010,excavationofBurma’ssecondlargestirondepositonPinpetmountaininTaunggyi Township, southernShanState seems imminentasbulldozershavebegunclearingthearea.240TheprojectsiteisnearaconflictareawheretheShanStateArmySouthandPa-OhNationalLiberationArmyareresistingtheBurmesemilitary.Thesituationremainsunstable.241Themountainishometo7,000mainlyethnicPa’OhandShanvillagers.Another35,000livingalonganearbytributaryareendangeredbypossiblepollutionfromuntreatedwaterandheavymetalladentailings.242Themountainhas70milliontonsofhematiteandlimoniteore.243StakeholdersinvolvedincludetheTyazhpromexportCompany(Russia)andDanieliCompany(Italy).Farmersatthesitearebeingdisplacedandtherearefearsoffurtherforcedrelocation.Constructionofanironfactoryhasbegun.InJune20097,000acresoffarmlandwasconfiscatedforthefactorycompound.InSeptember2010,farmersinonevillagewereoffered5,000 kyat ($5.34USD)per acrebut they refused to accept theinadequatelysmallamount.InMarchandApril2010,villagerswereforcedtosell300acresoflandatapricefarbelowmarketratesforanewbuilding.
xxxi Artisanalminingisdrivenbypovertyandischaracterizedbyrudimentary,traditionalmethods.Itislaborintensiveandoccursinformally,alwaysasameansofsubsistence.Itrequireslittletonocapitalinputs.xxxiiTheothercurrentinvestoristheMonywaTrustwhichreceivedassetsfromIvanhoeMinesLtdofVancouverin2007onconditionthatitfindsabuyerforIvanhoe’sshareofthemine.IvanhoeMinesoriginallyestimatedthat$500millionUSDwouldbeneededtodeveloptheresourceextractionprojectandsoughtAsianpartnersapparentlyunsuccessfullytojoinintheventure.Norinco’sdealwasreportedintheMyanmarTimesinAugusttobeabilliondollars.IftheMyanmarTimesstoryiscorrect,thepricetagforgettingthecopperoreoutofLetpadaung isdouble theoriginalestimate.Courier InformationService, “LetpadaungCopperProject toReceiveBillionDollarInvestment”August16,2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
62
Figure 4 Polluted water from Tigyit coal mine, flowing into upper Balu creek then Inle lake. PYO 2010.
A250-milepipeline transferringnaturalgas to the iron factoryhasdestroyedvillagers’farmlandsalongtheroute.244HundredsoffarmershavelosttheirlandfortheKehsiMansamcoalmineandcoalpowerplantinTigyit,bothinShanState,which,alongsidethenaturalgaspipelineandahydropowerplant inKengTawngwillprovideenergytooperatethefactory.245Ironoresamplesatthesitehavetestedhighforarseniccontent,raisingfearsthattheminingoperationswillimpactfarmersatthefootofthemountainastheirfieldsmaybecoveredwithtoxicwastesoils.ReutersNewsAgencyrevealedinJulythatChina’sTaiyuanIronandSteelGroup(TISCO)signedanagreementtoworktogetherwiththeChinaNonferrousMetalMiningGroup(CNMC)indevelopingamajornickelminingprojectatTagaungtaung,MandalayDivision. Thecostof theproject isestimatedat$800millionUSD.246
Burmahasover16large-scalecoaldeposits,withatotalofover270milliontonsofcoalresources.TheTigyitcoalmineinsoutheasternShanstate,just13kmfromInleLake,isBurma’sbiggestopenpitcoalmine,producing2,000tonsofcoaldaily.ThereisalsoacoalfiredpowerplantinTiygitwhichisslatedforuseattheIronminingfactoryinTaunggyi.PollutedwaterfromthemineandwastefromthepowerplantflowviatheBalucreekintoInleLake,howeverasyettherehasbeennostudyontheimpactoftheprojectonthelake.Implementationof themineandpowerplantbegan in2002byChinaNationalHeavyMachineryCorporationandBurmesecompaniesEdenGroupandShanYomaNagar.Two
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
63
villageswereforcedtorelocate,andover500acresoffarmlandwasconfiscated.Airandwaterpollutionisthreateningtheagriculturallivelihoodsandhealthofnearly12,000peoplethatlivewithinafivemileradiusoftheprojectsites.247
Mining in Shan State has brought about themany environmental andhuman rightstransgressionsincludingforceduncompensatedrelocationofethniccommunitiesandtheforcedsaleofland.InSengPinin2004,about150Akha,SamTao,andLahufamiliesfromfivevillageswereforcedtomovebytheceasefireNationalDemocraticAllianceArmy(NDAA)tomakeroomfor200Chinesefamiliesworkingatacoalminethere.Similarly,inApril2006,ninevillageslocatedninemilesoutsideofKengtungwereorderedtorelocatetofacilitatecoalminingoperations.248 Thai, Chinese,Russian, Italian, SouthKoreanand JapanesecompaniesalloperateinShanStateinconcertwiththeBurmesegovernment,Burmesecompaniesandethnicarmedgroups.249 250 251 252
AtleastsevencoalminesareactiveinsouthernandeasternShanStatewithatleasteightmoreinvariousunconfirmedstatesofoperation.Activemininginthestatealsoincludesoneironmine,twomanganesemines,threegoldmines,onezincmine,twoplatinummines,andonerubymine.ShanStatehasbothahistoryofminingand isrich inmineralsyetuntapped. In rarecases local communitiesareable tohaltoravoiddestructiveminingactivitieson their lands through collectiveaction. Inother cases companiesmayholdgovernment,butnotlocallygrantedrightstoaminebutareunabletoworkthedepositduetoconflictandanunstablepoliticalandbusinessclimate.253 254 255 256 257
ThefullextentofpollutionfromtheseminesintoMekongtributariesandtheirsurroundingenvironmentsisunknown.FoodsecurityimpactsontheShan,AhKha,andLahuvillagerslivingdownstreamfromminingoperations,andwaterpollutionarealreadybeingfelt.Onevillagerstated“Ican’tseethecatfishbecausethewaterisdirty.”258
In1997, theSPDCbegan togivegoldmining concessions toBurmesebusinessmen inShwegyinTownship,PeguDivision.By2005therewereover40miningcompaniesintheShwegyinarea.Landwasoftenconfiscatedandvillagersweredeniedaccess touplandfarms.Theareawasheavilymilitarizedtoprotectthecompanies.Villagershadnoalternativesourceoflivelihoodsoformedsmallgroupsandsoldtheirlandtoinvestinmachineryandobtainedgoldminingpermits.Traditionallyvillagersinthisareadependedonriversandforestlandsfortheirlivelihoodsandculturalpractices.Nowculturalpracticesandknowledgeofsmall-scaleminingtechniquesisbeinglost.Thelocalenvironmenthasalsobeenseverelyaffected.Miningoperationshavedrainedwatersources,increasedsoilerosion,andriverspollutedwithmercuryandotherchemicals.Mercuryishighlytoxictotheenvironmentandposesseriousriskstopublichealth.259Thevastmajorityoftoxicwastesfromgoldextractionprocesses is disposedofuntreateddirectlyonto landand intowaterways, effectivelypoisoning the soil and compromisingwater quality.Mercuryxxxiiiand other toxics arebiomagnifyingxxxiv infoodchainsandaccumulatinginthetissuesoflivingorganisms,withnegativeeffectsonfloraandfauna,localbiodiversity,andhumanhealth.260
xxxiiiLiquidmercuryisverypoisonoustopeopleandanimals,causingmanygovernmentstobanitsuse.However,itisstillwidelyutilizedthroughoutthegoldminingprocesstoseparategoldparticles.xxxivTheincreaseofconcentrationofasubstance,suchaspesticidesorothertoxics,inhumansandanimalsduetotheirconsumptionofotherorganismsloweronthefoodchain.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
64
LocallivelihoodshavebeenfurtherimpactedbyanelectricityproducingdamontheShweGyinriver.Despiteflooding,manysmallscaleoperationscontinuetopursuegoldfromrafts.InnearbyMawtamawarea,amemberoftheKarenEnvironmentCommitteereportsthatsmallscalegoldminingprovidesameansthroughwhichlocalpeopleareabletobuybasicdailynecessities.However, theSPDC, theKNUandthecompanies involvedremain themajorbeneficiariesofgoldmininginShwegyinTownship.261
5.4 Deforestation
ThemostrecentdatafromtheForestDepartmentlistspercentageofnaturalforest(bothclosedandopenforests)in2010at47percent(only23percentofwhichisclosedforest),withabout67millionhectaresoftotalforestland.262ArecentFAOstudyclaimsthepercentagechangeofthetotalforestareabetween1990and2000was-6.9percent,andthatbetween2000and2005was-3.7percent.From1990to2005,thetotalforestareachangedattherateof-10.3percent.263FromtwoperiodicalassessmentsonforestcoverofMyanmar,itwasfoundthatannuallyover100,000hectaresofnaturalforestswerelostduringtheperiodfrom1975to1989whileforestarealostinlateryearsfrom1989to1998wereover450,000hectaresperannum,equalinga1.4percentannualforestlossduringthatperiod.Thisistheequivalentofclearingmorethan75soccerfieldsofforestsanhour.264Itshowsthatrateofdeforestationafter1989hadbeen fourtimeshigher than thatofbefore1989.However,many organizations question the validity of those figures. In the 1990s,deforestation inBurmawasestimatedby theRainforestActionNetwork tobemuch higher-from800,000to1millionhectaresayear.265Burmahasbeenmarkedasthecountrywithoneofthehighestdeforestationratesintheworld.266 267 268
AccordingtoarecentpresentationbytheForestDepartment,“Themajoraccelerationafter1989coincidedwiththeopeningoftheforestrysectortotheprivatesectorintheaftermathoftheeconomicreformsof1988.”Inadditiontocommercialloggingactivities(legalandotherwise),forestsarealsobeingdecimatedbyprivateagriculturalconcessions,whichinfactsometimesactasacoverforloggingwithlittleagriculturalcropsevenplanted.Forestdegradationcanbelinkedto taungyapracticestoo,althoughitdependsonthetypeofforest,agriculturalpractices,populationdensityandtraditionallandmanagementstrategies,amongothercomplexvariables.
5.4.1 Logging
A2009 report byGlobalWitness “ADisharmonious Trade: China and the continueddestructionofBurma’snorthern frontier forests” states thatwhile loggingmayhavedecreasedinnorthernBurma,itisstillamajorsourceoffinanceforthemilitarytocontinuerepressionofethniccommunities:
In2007-08,timberwastheSPDC’sfourthmostimportantexportcommodityearningit$538USDinlegalforeignexchange.Foreignexchangeearnings,derivedfromthesaleoftimberandothernaturalresources,areimportanttotheregimebecauseinternationaltradeisalmostexclusivelyconductedinhardcurrency,usuallyU.S.dollars.BybuyingtimberfromofficialSPDCsources, eventimberproduced inaccordancewithBurma’s forest laws,
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
65
companiesarecontributingdirectlytothefinancesofthemilitaryregimewithalltheconsequencesthatthatentails.Thelinkbetweentimberrevenueandtheregime’sviolentrepressiononcivilianswillonlybebrokenoncethehumanrightsabusesstop.269
Thecountry’sforestshavebecomeasourceofsignificantincomeforthegovernmentandarmedoppositiongroups,wherebothlegalandillegalloggingisstillongoing.SincetheeruptionofcivilwarinBurma,allpartiesinvolvedinthecurrentconflicthavereliedontheextractionofnaturalresources,primarily loggingandmining,tofundtheirarmies.ThescaleofloggingrosedramaticallyaftertheStateLawandOrderRestorationCouncil(SLORC)emergedin1988,andagainafterethnicpoliticalgroupssignedceasefireswiththejunta.ThemostseriousdestructionfromlogginghasoccurredinethnicareasalongtheborderswithChinaandThailand,namely,KachinState,ShanState,KarenniState,KarenState,andTenasserimDivision.270China,Thailand,andIndiaareBurma’sbiggesttimberimporters.271
Previously,theseareascontaineduntouchedforestreserveswithavarietyofhardwoodandtropicalrainforestsandincludedmanyimportantwatershedareas.DozensofloggingconcessionsweresoldbytheSLORCtonumerousThailoggingcompaniesintheearly1990s,and loggingwas thegovernment’sprimary sourceofgaining long sought-after foreigncurrency.Revenuefromloggingwasextremelylucrative,averagingatthattime$200millionUSDayear.272
Atthesametime,logginghasalsoprovidedincomeforethnicarmedoppositiongroups.Manyof the loggingconcessionssoldwere located inareascontrolledbythesearmedgroups,includingtheKarenNationalUnion(KNU),theNewMonStateParty(NMSP),theKarenniNationalProgressiveParty,andtheMongTaiArmy.273Afterthesigningofceasefireagreements, logging radically increased inKachinStateand innorthernShanState, asceasefiregroups liketheKachin IndependenceOrganization(KIO), theUnitedWaStateArmy(UWSA),theShanStateArmy-North(SSA-N),andtheNewDemocraticArmy-Kachin(NDA-K)beganpredominantlyrelyingonsellingtimbertocontinuetofundtheirarmies,administrationanddevelopmentprograms.274Forexample, theKIO losttheir territorialcontroloverHpakantjademinesasconditionalundertheir1994ceasefireagreementwiththeregime.Theythenturnedtotheothervaluabletradableresourceundertheircontrol–timber.
AfterthelitanyofceasefireagreementswithethnicpoliticalgroupsoperatingalongtheChinaborder,ChinesecompaniesthenjoinedThailoggersinvigorouslycuttingdownforests,includinghighly-prizedteak.275In2004,JohnBuckrell,thenthespokespersonfromGlobalWitness’sBurmaprogram,stated,“LoggingintheKachinStateissevereandchaotic,anditisclearthatlocalpopulationhasbenefitedlittleineconomicterms.”276
InnorthernShanState,SPDCmilitiagroupsandaboutsevenceasefiregroupsareinvolvedinlogging.277IndiscriminatelogginghasdestroyedmanyofShanState’sforests,andonlyafewstrandsofteakstillremain.278
Frommid2008 to July2009, theBurmesegovernment sold logging concessions to11BurmesetimberfirmsinKNU-heldTenasserimDivision.279TheKNUhasalsograntedlogging
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
66
rightstoThaiandBurmesecompanies.WhilethegeneralconsensusisthattheKNUdoesnotwanttoallowfurtherloggingintheirareas,theyreluctantlyconcededtoafewofthesecompaniesduetoeconomicnecessity.
AccordingtoMinorityRightsGroupInternational, inKarenniState“loggingofteakandothertimbersisofteneitherdoneillegally,orpermittedbyBurmeseauthoritiesincompletedisregardofanypre-existinglandorusagerightsoftheindigenousKarenni.”280
5.4.2 Case Study: Logging in Kachin State
LoggingbusinesscontinuesinKachinStatewithlittleornobenefittolocalpeople.RecentfieldresearchconfirmedthatafewChinesebusinesspeople,somehighrankingKIOofficials,andsomewell-connectedKachinandBurmesebusinesspeoplegetthemostbenefitfromthe loggingtrade.KIOofficialsoftengiveconcessions,withbribesgiventoSPDC’sareamilitarycommanderstofacilitatethedeals.ChinesebusinesspeoplethenfacilitategettingthelogstoChinabyworkingwithlocalvillagersandtraderstotransportthelogsacrosstheborder.Teakandotherhighlyvaluablehardwoods,suchasironwoodandrosewood,inKachinStatehaveallbutgonethroughselective loggingforthesedesiredexpensivespecies.Nowsomelocalpeoplehavestartedcuttinglessvaluablewoodtoproducecharcoaltosupplementtheirmeagerincome,alongwithsellingbigbanyantreeswhicharebeingreplantedalongtheroadinChina.Asaresult,manyareasinKachinStatehavebecome
Figure 5 After depletion of the majority of large trees, small trees are being cut down by local business people and exported to China, Kachin state. Local researcher 2010.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
67
deforested. Thefield research showed that compared to2002-2007, loggingbusinessdecreasedinMaiJaYangby2010becausetherearenomorebigandvaluabletreesleftthere.However,theloggingtradehasextendedtoN’manYang,Mambaw,andSinboandbeyond,especiallyareasunderroadconstruction,oftenbyChinesecompanies.281
AseasternKachinStatebecomesmoredeforested,companiesaregoingfurtherwest,suchasintheTriangleAreaandinSagaingDivision,tofindremainingvaluabletrees.SometreesarealsocomingfromHugawngValleyfromYuzana’smassiveagriculturalconcession.ButasthegovernmentasgreatercontroloverKachinState,evenlogsthatarecutthereoftengothroughSPDC-controlledbordercheckpointsordowntoRangoonforexport.ThesenewdevelopmentshavecomeattheexpenseoftheKIOtaxingboththecuttingandthecross-bordertradeoflogs,leavingthemwiththusfundstocontinuetheirstruggle. 282
5.4.3 Rotational Agriculture and Fuel-wood Demand
WhileloggingistheprimaryreasonforforestlossandfragmentationinBurma’smountainousborderregionsintheNorthandEast,forestconversion,charcoalproduction,andfuel-woodcollectionare leadingcauses fordeforestation in the lowlandsof centralandsouthernBurma.TheWorldBankestimatesthatthree-quartersofBurma’senergyneedsaremetbyfuel-woodandcharcoaltomeetsuchneedsascooking,lighting,andheating.WhilesomeindigenouspeoplesliketheKarenclaimtopracticetraditionalagriculturalmethodsthatdonotdestroyforests,therotationalfarmingsystemsofKarenandotherethnicgroupsliketheKarenni,Kachin,Chin,andShanarelargely—andperhapsunfairly—blamedbytheBurmesegovernmentforcontributingtoheavyforestloss.283 AccordingtoBurma’sForestryDepartment,in1998almost23%ofthetotallandareawasaffectedbyshiftingagriculture.284 Officially,thegovernmentregardssuchdeforestationcausedbyswiddenagriculturetobeamanifestationof“socialdisadvantages”andpoverty,anddoesnotrecognizethesustainablelivelihoodandlandmanagementtechniquesofruralcommunitiesinethnicareas.285Infactswiddencultivation,dependingonhowitispracticedandpopulationlevelsinthearea,cancontributetobiologicaldiversityandenrichtheecosystem.Thisscientificevidence,however,isoverlookedaspartofthegovernment’saimtoeradicateshiftingcultivationinordertoresettleuplandsubsistencecommunitiesintomilitary-surveillancelowlandvillages.OneoftheclearobjectivesoftheMinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation(MoAI)istoendtaungya cultivationinfavorofpermanentagriculture.286
5.4.4 Mangrove deforestation
Oftendominatingthecoastlinesoftropicalandsubtropicalareas,mangrovesareabridgebetweenterrestrialandmarineenvironmentprovidingperfectconditionsforextremelydiverseandproductiveecosystems.Themangrove forests transferorganicmatterandenergyfromthelandtothesea,formingthebaseofmarinefoodwebs.Theyarealsohometoawidevarietyofmarineandterrestriallife,andserveasnurseriesforcoralreefsandcommerciallyimportantfishspecies.Inaddition,mangroveforestsplayavitalroleintrappingsediments,therebystabilizingcoastlinesandprotectingcoralreefsandseagrassmeadows.ThethreemainareasofmangroveforestsinBurmaarelocatedinArakanState,Irrawaddy(Ayeyarwady)DivisionandTennasserimDivision.Mangroves canalsobe foundon thecoastlinesofMonStateandRangoonDivisions.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
68
TheMyanmarEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)detailsthatsincetheearly1920s,asoneofthemainBritishcolonialdevelopmentpolicies,wideswathesofmangroveforestshavebeeneliminatedforpaddyfarming,andlatershrimpfarming.Theforestsalsoprovidefirewoodforlocalcommunities,andasourceofcharcoalforthepopulation.In1924,therewere253,018hectaresofmangrovesinthedeltaforestreserve,butthiswasdwindleddowntojust111,939haby2001.287Inthe1980s,fuelwoodextractionforcharcoalproductionbegantotakeitstollonmangroves,andwassubsequentlybannedinthe1990s,althoughthepracticecontinues.Habitatdestructionreacheditspeakin2001,with35,836hectareslostthatyear,anamountequivalentto24%ofthetotalmangroveforestareain2000.288
Previouslythemaincauseofmangrovedeforestation(particularlyinthedeltaarea)wasrice cultivation.According to theMangroveActionProject, 85%ofmangroves in theIrrawaddyDeltahavebeenlosttoricefarming.289Shrimpfarmingisnowconsideredtheleadingcauseofmangrovedeforestationalongthecoastline.TheEPAstatesthat“shrimpfarmingisthemaincontributortothelossofmangroveinthedeltaarea”.TheNetworkonEnvironmentalandEconomicDevelopment(NEED)estimatesthatabout65%ofArakanState’smangroveshavebeencutdowntomakeroomforcommercialshrimpfarms,andtoalesserextent,brick-makingforBurmaArmybattalions.290
AlongBurma’sAndamancoastline,traditionalfishingcommunitiesarebecomingfurtherentrenchedinpovertyastheirmeansoflivelihoodandnourishmentisbeingwipedout.291
Figure 6 Confiscated land for shrimp farming causing mangroves to die, Rathedaung township, Arakan state. NEED-Burma 2011
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
69
AcasestudyMyebonTownship,ArakanStateshowedthatthelivelihoodsoflocalpeoplewhotraditionallyfarmedshrimpinmangroveforestshavebeenaffectedbytheincreaseincommercialshrimpfarming.Theynowhavetoapplyforpermits,whiletheircatchingareashavealsobeenlimitedbytheencroachingcommercialshrimpfarms,whichclearlargeareasofmangrovetoestablishpondsthatareintensivelyfarmed.ManyvillagersnowworkonThaitrawlersorhavelefttofindjobsinneighboringThailand.292
AfterCycloneNargistheUNFoodandAgricultureOrganizationstatedthatpartsofBurma’scoasthadbeen largely cleared (forfishponds, agricultural landandestablishmentofsettlements,andover-exploitationofthemangroveresource)inrecentdecadesandthatthisleftcoastalcommunitiesmoreexposedtocyclonedamageasthecoastlinelackedaprotectiveforestbuffer.293
ThegovernmentandNGOshaveembarkedonanumberofmangrovereforestationinitiativesover thepast10years.AfterNargis theseeffortsweresteppedupandrecentlyanewnetworkcalledMangroveEnvironmentResearchNetwork(MERN)composedof17localNGOswasformedtoco-ordinatetheseeffortswithafocusonaquaforestry.Thenetworkfocusesonconservationandlivelihoodimprovementinitiatives.Forexample,aspartoftheaquaforestryprograminIrrawaddyDivision,farmerswillbreedfish,prawnandmudcrabs.294
5.4.5 Impacts of Deforestation on Local People and the Environment
Unabatedandwidespreadforestlossisasourceofmuchsufferingforlocalcommunities,the ecosystems they rely upon for their livelihoods, and the surroundingwildlife.Deforestationthreatensthelivelihoodsandculturalpracticesofindigenouspeopleswhodependonforests.Logging,mining,hunting,andotherextractiveindustrialactivitiesthattakeplaceintheforestdonottotallyeliminatealltreecover,butinsteadstriptheforestofdesiredtreespeciesandleavebehindsoftwoods,malformedanddiseasedtrees,easy-to-burnforestslashxxxv,stranglingvines,andfast-growingintroducedweeds.Localbiodiversityisfurtherdegraded,astimbercompaniesdestroyandfragmentseveralofthelastknownextensiverainforestsofSoutheastAsia,hometomanyendangeredspecies.Logginghasalsobeenshowntobedirectlyresponsibleforfloods,soilerosion,landslides,sedimentationbuild-upbehinddams,riversiltation,increaseddryseasonwatershortages,stuntedfarmproductivity,anddecliningtopsoilfertility.
WhileBurma’svaluableforestsarebeingexploited,verylittlebenefit,economicorotherwise,aresharedwithlocalcommunities.295Inaddition,depletedforestsaregenerallyignoredandnotreforested.
5.5 Large Scale Agricultural Concessions
Overthepastdecade,andespeciallysince2008,theBurmesegovernmenthaspromotedtheestablishmentof large-scalemonocultureplantations inBurma.MostgovernmentinitiativespromoteindustrialcropssuchasJatropha,palmoilandrubber,aswellasannual
xxxvForestslashreferstotheunusableresidueleftonthelandafterloggingoperations.Thisincludestreebranches,tops,bark,unusablelogs,uprootedstumps,andbrokenoruprootedtrees.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
70
cropssuchascassava, sugarcane,andpaddy rice.Thesegovernment-led initiativesarechanneledthroughmilitary-favoredcompaniessuchasYuzana,HtooTrading,Dagon,MaxMyanmar,andarethreateninghumansecurity,ecologicalintegrity,landtenureandfoodsecurity,andtheoveralllivelihoodsoflocalfarmers.ThisispartofawidertrendthroughouttheMekongregionoverthelastdecadeofforeign-investedplantationdevelopment.
AgriculturaldevelopmentinBurmahasreceivedanewboostwiththegovernment’spartialliberalizationof theagricultural sector. Following the1991Wastelands Law, aprivatecompanyisabletoleaseupto5,000acresforupto30years(withapossibleextension),orupto50,000acresforperennialcrops.Inreality,however,landblocksoftenaregivenallatonce,andsometimesfarexceedingthe50,000acremax.Whilemostoftheagriculturalinvestmentisingovernment-controlledareas,insomecasesagriculturalconcessionsaregrantedbyaceasefiregroupwithinitssemi-autonomousterritory.
Nearlythree-fourthsofthecountry’spopulationliveinruralareas,andalmostthesamepercentageofpeoplearedependentonlandastheprimarymeansforlivelihood.296
Ingovernment-controlledareas,40-60%offarminghouseholdsrelysolelyonsmallfarmsunder5acresor2hectares(underminimumsubsistencelevels),withsomeareas(suchaseastern Shan State) recordingmuchhigher percentages.297 About one-quarter of allhouseholdsinnon-conflictareas(SPDC-controlled)inBurmaarelandless,butthatfocusesmostlyonBurmeselowlands.Onereportexamininglandtenureinsecurityinuplandethnicareasfoundbetween8-50%landlessnessinsouthernShanStateand35%inpartsofKachinState.298Seetablebelowforgovernmentdata.Landlessnessvariesgreatlywithgeographicalareaandsocio-economicstanding,withsignificantdifferencesbetweenrural-urban,lowland-upland,andwealthy-poor,amongotherfactors.
No. of HH-based Land Holdings by Size of Holding.
Size of Land Holding 1993 % 2003 % Growth (%)
UnionTotal 2,729,258 100% 3,338,152 100% 22%
1 Under1Acre 187,494 7% 471,782 14% 152%
2 1Acreandunder3 713,889 26% 766,422 23% 7%
3 3Acresandunder5 563,175 21% 635,806 19% 13%
4 5Acresandunder10 759,028 28% 796,439 24% 5%
5 10Acresandunder20 413,695 15% 504,426 15% 22%
6 20Acresandunder50 90,997 3% 157,945 5% 74%
7 50AcresandOver 986 0% 5,332 0% 441%
Source: Report on Myanmar Census of Agriculture 2003 (Union), p 38.
MoAIisfollowingliberalizationtrendsinallowingprivateentitiestoleaseagriculturallandplots.Assuch“nationalcompaniesandassociationsintheprivatesectorareencouragedandgrantedrightstodeveloptheseareasforthecultivationofpaddy,pulses,oilseeds,industrialcrops,rubber,oilpalm,etc.”299In2001morethanonemillionacreswereallocated
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
71
tonearly100enterprisesandassociations(CSO2003).By2008,almost200companiesweregranted1.55millionacresforcommercialfarming.Andby2010thetotalconcessionareahasexpandedfurthertonearly1.75millionacresallocatedto216differentprivateBurmesebusinesses (nationalonly,not foreign).Whilenearlyhalfof the total acreageallocatedwasinTenasserimDivision(insupportofoilpalmplantationdevelopment),thenexthighestamountofacreageallottedbystate/divisionwasKachinStatewith11companiesreceivingnearly400,000acres.InsouthernShanState,over65,000acreswereallocatedto12companies,andover40,000acrestoninecompaniesinnorthernShanState.300Thefollowingtableliststhenumberofcompaniesandtotalacreageawardedforeachstate/division,asprovidedbyMoAI.
Granted Area for Large-scale Commercial Farming, updated Jan 31, 2010.
State/Division No. of companies Granted Area (acre)
Kachin 11 393,292
Kayin 1 2,161
Sagaing 27 95,557
Tanintharyi 37 671,053
Bago(East) 9 5,859
Bago(West) 7 13,913
Magwe 38 202,492
Mandalay 16 10,300
Yakhine 14 2,602
Rangoon 7 30,978
Shan(South) 12 65,772
Shan(North) 9 40,937
Ayeyarwady 28 193,353
Total 216 1,728,269
Source:DAP,Myanmar Agriculture in Brief,2010:82.
Governmentdata illustrates trends in increasingacresof landbeing transferred fromsmallholderfarmerstoprivatecompanies.Whatistermed“non-householdspeciallandholdings”(i.e.landownedbyprivatecompanies)increasedby900percentfromthemid-1990stomid-2000s,and325percentfortotalarea ofprivatelandholdings.301
Largelandholdingshasclearlyincreased,whichcanbeaccreditedtotheexpansionofthecultivationofwhatthegovernmentnowlabelsas‘wastelands’underthe1991WastelandLaw.The‘wastelands’arefarmlandswithoutgovernmentregistrationtitles,whichveryfewfarmerscanobtain;ineffectthencustomaryfarmlandisforciblyconfiscatedandgrantedtotheprivatecompany.Thetablebelowillustratestheseworryinglandprivatizationtrends.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
72
No. of HH and non HH-based Holding.
Holdings 1993 2003 % change
1.TotalNumberofLandHoldings 2,729,820 3,343,793 22
1.1HouseholdBasedLandHoldings 2,729,258 3,338,152 22
1.2NonHHBasedSpecialLandHoldings 562 5,641 904
Source: Report on Myanmar Census of Agriculture 2003:19
Without the systematicmappingof lands suitable for large-scale industrial agriculturalconcessionsand transparentallocationof this land, this contentiousand ill-conceivedprogramisopentoabusebyofficialsandinfringingonfarmers’livelihoodsandcustomarylandrights.Thereisacompletelackoftransparencyandaccountabilitywithinthetop-downlandallocationprocess,sideliningthe farmersandotherstate lineagencies inplaceofmilitaryauthorities.
InBurma, cropping intensity and yields is higher for smallholders compared to largeconcessions,despitegovernmentrhetoriconleasingwastelandstoprivatecompaniestoreachfoodsurplusquotas.Evenagovernmentdocumentrecognizesthat“non-householdbasedlandholdingssuchasprivatecompanieswhoappliedforlargeamountsoflandareasforcultivationhadnotyetutilizedthewholeareaforcultivation”.302ThisisbecausemanyofthelargeBurmesecompanieshavebeencoercedbytheregimeleadersintodevelopingtheconcession,despitenotwantingtogetinvolvedinthiscampaignbecauseoftheveryhighinitialinvestmentcostsbornentirelybythecompany.Inthissense,thecompaniesdo‘foot-dragging’strategiestoavoidinvestingmorecapitalintodevelopingtheconcession.Itisalsowellknownthatsomecompaniesinvolvedintheloggingbusinesswhoreceiveagriculturalconcessionslogtheland,sellthetimberontheblackmarket,andthenvacatethelandwithouteverplantinganycrops.Companiesthathavethefinancialresourcesandconnectionstopotentiallymakelargeprofitstrytodeveloptheirentireconcession.
Confiscating smallholder customary farms tomakeway for large-scale private landconcessionshasatremendousimpactonthesocio-economicconditionsofthesurroundingarea,attheregionalscale,andevenatthenationallevel.Farmerswhoareforciblyevictedfromtheirfamilyfarmsoftengofurtherafieldtolookfornewfieldstocultivate,whichtheyclearonforestedhillsidesoruseanexistingswiddenfromarelative,eitherforfreeorwithanarrangedpayment.Thesenewfarmingplotsareoftenatleastahalf’sdaywalkfromthevillage,requiringthatthecultivatorsstayatthefieldsiteforlongperiodsduringplantingandharvestingtime,creatingwhatlocalresearcherscall‘satellitevillages’.
Foodsecurityisbeingrapidlyerodedfromlandconfiscations.Ifahouseholdcannotfindanewplotoflandtofarmnearby,thentheymustbecomewagelaborers,bothforon-andoff-farmlabor.Whilenewlandconcessionsrequirewagelaborerstopreparethefield,plant,weedandharvest,companiesoftendonothirelocalfarmers–whowerekickedofftheircustomaryland–inethnicareas.InsteadtheyoftenhirelabormigrantsmostlyfromtheCentralDryZoneandthecyclone-affecteddeltaarea.Fewlocalsarehiredforthesejobs,thusminimizinganylocaleconomicbenefits.Thisiscausinghostilitywiththelocalethnicpopulations,whofeeltheconcessionsandassociatedlabormigrationaspartofapost-warmilitarystrategy.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
73
Therearemajorenvironmentalconcernswithregardtomonocultureagriculturalplantations.Landmanagementsystemsthatmaintainbiodiversityarethemosteffectivestrategytoadapttoclimatechangeandenhancefoodsecurity.Mono-plantationsdegradethesesocio-ecological benefits.Anagricultural concessionentails clear-cutting the landand thenbulldozingtheareatoprepareforplantingtheseedlings,whichofteninvolvesburninganyremainingunmarketablewoods. Theburning, churningof soil, and lackof treeshasdeleteriouseffectsonthelocalclimateandcontributestoglobalwarmingbyreleasing,insteadofabsorbing,carbondioxide.Otherconcernsincludedisruptionofnaturalwatercycles,overuseofwaterforirrigation,soilandwaterpollutionaswellashumanpoisoningfrom chemical inputs, and loss ofwildlife fromhabitat destruction, infrastructuredevelopment,andincreasedhuntingpressuresfrommigrants.
5.5.1 Profiled Agricultural Commodities
Rubber plantations
RubberisnowthemostwidelyplantedindustrialcropinBurmatoday.TheBurmesemilitarygovernmenthasa30-yearrubbercropdevelopmentgoalof1.5millionplantedacres.Fromjustover550,000acresplantedin2005-06,sownacreagejumpeduptoover725,000acresthefollowingyearwhenChinesesubsidieswereavailable.Injustunderfiveyears–from2004-05to2008-09–theacreageofsownrubberinnorthernBurmamorethandoubledfromjustover½millionacresto1.057millionacres.303Totalacreageplantedthenincreasedto1.14millionacresin2009-10andexpectedtoreach1.23millionin2010-11.304
WhilemostofBurma’srubberproductionstillcentersontraditionalrubber-growingareasinsouthernBurma,especiallyMonState(firstpromotedbythecolonialBritish),therehasbeenamajorexpansionoflarge-scalerubberplantationsineasternKachinStateaswellasnorthernShanstateincludingtheWaautonomousregion.Rubberplantationsingovernment-controlledterritoriesaremoreconcentratedalongroads,suchasontheoldBurmaRoadinnorthernShanState.ButinWaAutomousRegiontheWaauthoritieshavecoveredwholemountainsinrubber,makingWaterritorythe“centeroftherubberrevolutioninnorthernBurma”.305About90percentoftherubberproducedisexportedtoChinaandfiveASEANcountries—Malaysia,Singapore,Vietnam,ThailandandIndonesia.306
Chinaisamajorplayerinthecountry’srubbersectorinthenorth–bothintermsoffinancingandoverland imports. Investors fromothercountriesarealso showing recent interest,especiallyforlandinthesouth.Chineseinvestmentinplantationsofrubberandothercrops suchas corn, cassava, rice, tea, sugarcaneandwatermelon inBurmahasbeenunderway since themid-2000s, largelyfinanced throughChina’snationalOpiumCropSubstitution policy. The Chinese national program is implemented throughChinesebusinessmenwhoreceivestate-backedfunds.ZaoNoamclaimsinhisarticlethat“Chinesecompaniessometimes[operatinginBurma]workwithaBurmesecompanywhichiseitherowneddirectlybyagovernmentmilitaryofficialoranarmedethnicgroupofficial,orhasverygoodconnectionstomilitaryofficials.AChinesecompanynormallyprovidestechnicalexpertisealongwithseedlings,fertilizerandcapitalexpenditures,whilethelocalgovernmentand/orcease-firegroupauthoritiesprovideland,oftenconfiscatedfromfarmers,andlabor,
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
74
oftenforced.Chinesebusinessmenusuallypayforlaborthroughlocalauthoritiesratherthandirectlytothefarmers,whousuallyearnonlyafractionofwhatispaid”307
Thecropsubstitutionprogramisintendedtosubsidizefarmers’non-poppylivelihoodsbutisactuallydestroyingthosealternativelivelihoodsinrubberproductionareas.308ThemannerinwhichChina’sopiumcropsubstitutionpolicyisbeingimplementedisnotaidinglocalalternativelivelihoodsasintended.Furthermore,andmoreworrying,itappearstoactuallybepartlycontributingtotherecentspikeinopiumpoppycultivationinnorthernBurma.Ruraluplandfarmerswhoselandwasconfiscatedandwithoutemploymentoptionsareperhapssometimeresortingtooneofthefewoptionsremaining–cultivatingpoppyathigherelevationsunsuitableforrubber.
Chinesearenottheonlyinvestors.InApril2010theVietnamgovernmentsignedagreementsintwelvekeyinvestmentareasinBurmaafterabilateralvisit.Aspartofthegovernmentdeals,aMoUwassignedfora120,000acrerubberconcessionlocatedbetweenTaungupTownshipandMaEiSub-TownshipinSouthernArakanState.309
Largescalerubberplantationsaredisplacingsmall-scalefarmersfromtheiruplands,wherefoodcropsaregrownandwhichsincethebanningofpoppyproductionhasbecomethesole sourceofhousehold income.Displaced local farmersand their familiesare facingseriousfoodinsecurityandarenotbeinghiredbackaslaborers.Instead,particularlyinKachinstate,laborersfromotherpartsofthecountryarehired.Accordingtobusinessmen,Burmesewithpreviousexperiencetappingrubberarepreferred–sothatBurmanBurmesefromthesoutharemigratingintonorthernBurmaforseasonalwork,causinghostilitywithlocalethnicfarmers.310Inothercases,especiallyinWaAutonomousRegionwhererubberplantationdevelopmentaspartoftheopiumcropsubstitutionpolicyismostintense,localfarmersareoftenusedasseasonallabor.However,thereareallegationsthatthisiseitherforcedlaborasdictatedbythelocalWaarmyofficialoverseeingtheplantation,oraverysmallpaymentisofferedwhichonlycoversfoodandcigarettesfortheday.311 312Theworkersarepaid,onaverage,2,500Burmesekyat($2.50USD)perday.313TherestofthemoneypaidbytheChinesebusinessmanispocketedbythelocalmilitaryofficialsoverseeingtheconcession.314
DuetostrongBurmesemilitaryandceasefiregroupcontrolovertherubberconcessionallotments,poorfarmersareleftoutofthispotentialnewopportunityforsmall-holderrubberplantationslikethatinMonState.However,farmersinKachinandnorthernShanStatelackcreditandloanopportunities,aswellassecurelandrightstoeconomicallyandsociallybenefitfromtherecentrubberboom,whichtakesatleastsevenyearsbeforetreesproducelatex.315TheinabilityforruralfarmerstobenefitfromrubberissummarizedbyNoam:“Ahighinitial investmentisrequiredwithoutanyreturnforat leastsevenyearswhentherubbertreesaretapped,andsmall-scalefarmersareunabletoreceiveloans,becausewithoutpoppycultivationtheynolongerhaveanycollateral.Inaddition,rubbergrowersdependonChina for thevolatile cashcropmarket, leaving farmersextremelyvulnerable to thefluctuatingandunpredictableChinesedomestic rubbermarket—asevidencedbythetemporaryrubberpricecrashaftertherecentglobalmarketmeltdown”.316
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
75
ArecentdocumentarybyKwekalu,aKarenmediagroup,exposedinDecember2009over250acresoflandweretakeninLerPaDohvillage,Kaserdohtownship,TennasserimDivisionforarubberplantation.ThedocumentaryrevealsthataBurmesecompany,BiPwoTwe,forcedvillagerstosellthelandatabelow-market,companyprice.Ifvillagersdidn’tsellthelandtheyfearedthatthelandwouldbetakenbyforce.Consequently,thelandwassoldunderitsvalueandmanyvillagershadtheirland(whichwasprimarilyorchards)takenjustwhenthetreeswerebearingfruit.Onevillagerexplained:“Onmylandthetreeshadalreadybaredfruit.TheytoldmeifIdon’tsellthelandthenIwouldhavetoleave.Theysaidtheywouldtakeandpayfor3acresbuttheytookmorethan3acres.”Anothervillagercomplained:“Theydidn’tpayuptothevalueofmy land!”Villagersarenowdisplacedand living intemporaryhutsonuplandfarmlandnear their formerorchards.Thecompanyplans toconfiscatemoreland,andvillagersareconcernedtheywillbecomerefugeesastheyhavenoplacetogo.317
Jatropha
InDecember2005Burma’smilitarygovernmentbegantoimplementanation-widecropcampaigntoplantfivemillionacreswithJatropha curcasforbiodieselproduction.Jatropha curcas isoneofa seriesof feedstocks suchas soy,palmoil, sugarcanewhichcanbeprocessedintobiodiesel.Theoilfromitsnutscanbemixedwithdiesel,andusedasalow-gradefuel;butnotuntilthe5thyearorlatercanthetreesoffercommercialuse.Thereis
Figure 7 Rubber plantation, near Lashio, northern Shan state. Local researcher, December 2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
76
uncertainty surrounding theenvironmental andeconomic feasibilityof Jatropha asanenergycropastherehasnotbeenanycomprehensiveresearchconducted.318 Nevertheless,eachstateanddivisionwasorderedtoplant500,000acresofJatropha,takingoff2millionfromthenationaltargettoaccommodatethatitisanimpossiblequotaforsmallerstates/divisions,someofwhichareonlynominallycontrolledbythegovernment.Since2006,teachers,students,children,farmers,nurses,civilservants,andprisonershavebeenforcedtoplantthetreealongroadsides,atschools,hospitalsandreligiouscompounds,includingontheirownfarmlands.319Further,Burmesecompaniesareinvolvedinlarge-scale jatropha plantationsmuchlikeforrubber.
Jatrophacanbeplantedonmarginalsoilsanddoesnothavetocompetedirectlywithfoodcrops;howeverinBurmaitisbeingplantedonfarmlandwhichthendirectlyimpingesonpeople’s foodsecurity.The Jatrophanationalcampaignhasresulted inforced laborforplantingandconfiscationoffarmlands.Farmersareboundtoproductionquotasenforcedbystrictlaws.Interviewsrevealthatpeoplehavebeenfined,arrested,andthreatenedwithdeathfornotmeetingquotas,damagetoplants,defyingorders,orcriticismofthecampaign.Overeighthundred“jatropharefugees”havealreadyfledtoThailandfromsouthernShanStatealone.320Largescaleplantations(ofupto2,500acres)haveignoredlocalclimateandsoilconditionsandbeenplantedhaphazardly,withpoortechniquesandbadseedstock,resultingincropfailureratesrangingfrom25-75%.321
Accordingtointerviews,Burmesecompaniesareonlyexportingthenutsinsteadofusingitasadomesticbiodieselsourceasasubstituteforimportingoil.ForeigninvestmentinJatropa hasalsobeennoted in interviews,originatingmostly fromMalaysianChinese,mainlandChinese,SingaporeandThailand–buttheplantationsaremanagedbyBurmesecompanies.322 323
Palm Oil
Oilpalmisnoexceptiontothegovernment’srecentpushforfurtherdevelopingthecountry’sagriculturalsectorhand-in-handwiththeprivatesector.TheoilpalmsectorhasspecificallybeentargetedbecausethegovernmentwantstodecreasetheirrelianceonedibleoilpalmimportsfromMalaysia,whichamountstoover20,000tonspermonth.SotheBurmesegovernmentnowencouragesthecountry’sprivatesectortoboostdomesticproductionsotodecreaseimportsandassociatedcosts.OilpalminBurmaissofarusedasamuchmoreaffordableedibleoil,whichcostsabouthalfthepriceofothercookingoils,suchassesameandgroundnut.Noplanscurrentlyexisttouseitasabiofuel,however.
Thecountry’soilpalmindustryiscenteredinTennasserim(Tanintharyi)DivisionstartingsouthofTavoy(Dawei),whichismostsuitableforthepreferredclimateofoilpalm.ThissouthernextensionofBurma is alsowhere theworld’s last remaining intact lowlandDipterocarprainforestsreside,includingtheinfamousGurney’sPittabird.ThisisperhapsthemostthreatenedecosysteminSoutheastAsiaasMalaysiaandIndonesiahavealreadyconvertedtheirrainforests intooilpalmestates. Inorderforthecompaniestodeveloptheiroilpalmestate,theymustclear-cuttheland,sellingthelargervaluablelogsontheblackmarket,andburningtherest.Sometimesthecompaniesneverevenplantoilpalm,theconcessionawardedbeingjustacoverforverylucrativeloggingoperations.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
77
Accordingtogovernmentfigures,500,000acresofoilpalmconcessionshadalreadybeenawardedtoBurmesecompaniesinTennasserimDivisionby1999.By2009-10,thetotalconcessionareahaddoubled to justover1millionacres toabout40privateBurmesecompanies,althoughthemajorityofconcessionareasarecontrolledbyonlyahandfulofcompanies.However,onlyafractionofthetotalawardedconcessionshaveactuallybeenplanted.Accordingtogovernmentstatistics,about250,000acreshaveactuallybeenplantedsince2008-09,whichrepresentsa25percentincreasesince2006-07.Therehasbeenasteadyincreaseinoilpalmeveryyearthisdecadewithanoverall250percentincreasesince2000-01.324
ThevastmajorityoftheoilpalmplantationsareownedbyBurmesebusinessmen,withonlyasmallpercentageownedbythegovernment.Themilitaryandsmallholderfarmersalsocultivateamuchsmalleracreageofoilpalm.
ThemainBurmesecompanydevelopingtheindustrialoilpalmsectorisclearlyHtayMyint’sYuzanaOilPalmCultivationCompany,asubsidiaryoftheinfamousYuzanaCompany.Hewasthefirsttobeawardedaprivateoilpalmconcessionin1999,nowtotaling120,000-150,000acresinTanintharyiDivision.YuzanaCo.isalreadyharvestingandprocessingoilpalmfromtheirplantationswiththeirhigh-capacitycrudeandrefinedprocessingfactoriesfinishedafewyearsagointhearea.TheothercompaniesalreadyharvestingpalmoilalsoselltheirproducttoYuzanaCompany,whohasnoweffectivelymonopolizedthedomesticoilpalmsector.
CompaniesmakecontractswithBurmanlaborfrommostlythecentralDryZone,shippingthem to TennasserimDivisionusing the government-ownedMyanmar Star Shipping.However, about fairpercentageof themonly then slipacross theborder intoRayong,Thailand–acommonillegalentrypointforBurmesemigrants.
It isunclear thedegree towhichBurmese companiesare self-financing theiroil palminvestment.Inthemid-2000stheMyanmarEconomicBankgaveabigloantoBurmesecompaniesinvestingintheoilpalmsectorbuttheconditionswerenotoverlyfavorable.Sincethennomoreloanshavebeenprovidedtocompaniesinvestinginoilpalm.
ApparentlythereisnoformalforeigninvestmentinBurma’soilpalmsector,althoughitissuspectedthatsomeoftheBurmesecompanieswithextensiveoilpalmconcessionsarefinanciallybackedbyforeigninvestors,particularlyMalaysianChinese.Itisbelievedthatforeigninvestmentwillsoonfloodintothecountry’soilpalmsector,however.AlreadythereisspecificinterestalreadyexpressedfromThailand,Malaysia,KoreaandChina,withpendingcontractsforseveralforeigncompaniesbeingdiscussed.TheBurmesegovernmentnowencouragessuchforeigninvestmentastheywillobtaingoodprofitfromthehightaxeschargedtoforeigncompanies,aswellashelpreachtheirexportquotas.
Agribusinessasnowpracticed inBurmaemploysdestructiveprofit-maximizing farmingtechniquesonlybenefitingmilitary-favoredBurmesecompanies, foreign investors, andgovernments,butwhichseriouslyimpactsonlocalfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsaswellastheenvironment.Companiesdonothavetheresourcescapableofproducingconsistentlyhighyieldsonsuchlargeexpansesofland,whichisevidencedbytheslumpinagriculturalproductivitydespitemillionsofacresnowallottedtocompanies.Smallholderfarmersare
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
78
regardedasusinglandmostefficiently,andarebestsuitedtoworkingappropriatelyinanygivenenvironment,unlikenationalagriculturalprogramswithstatequotas.
5.5.2 Case Study: Degradation of Inle Lake
ThesecondlargestfreshwaterlakeinBurma,InleLake,isafamoustouristdestinationjustsouthofTaunggyiinShanState.Itislocated890metersabovesealevelintheBaluChaungvalleybetween theSinduang (to theeast)andLetmaunggwe,ThandaungandUdaungmountainranges(tothewest).325 326 ThirtystreamsfeedintoInleLake,whichthenheaddownstreameventuallyreachingtheMobyeDamandtheLawpitaHydropowerPlants.Lakedepthvarieswiththeseasonandissaidtoliesomewherebetweensevenmetersandfourmetersalthoughonemorerecentestimateputsittwometerslowerthananypreviousestimate.327 328 329
EnvironmentalandculturalsignificanceofInleLakehaslongbeenrecognized.InleLakeanditssurroundingsbecamealegallyprotectedbirdsanctuaryin1985.ThegovernmentsetuptheSteeringCommitteeofInleLakeConservationin1992.330In1998,InleLakewasnamedoneoftherepresentativesoftheEarth’s200mostvaluableeco-regions.331InleLakeisalsohometothePhaungDawOoPagodaandtheInthapeople,famousforastyleofboatrowingthatusestheleg,thehallmarkofthetouristindustrythere.In2006,InleLakeanditssurroundingswerenamedhometonineindigenousfishspeciesincludingthelocallyprizedInleCarp(locallycalled“nga-phein”),anestingplaceoftheSarusCraneandhabitatforawidediversityofmigratoryandresidentbirdspecies.
Inthepasttwentyyearsthepopulationinthe560m2LakeInleareahasgrownbynearly40%toover140,000in2005. 332BesidestheInthaethnicpopulation,theareaalsohasmanycommunitiesofShan,Pa’oh,Danu,TaungyoandBurmans.Livelihoodsintheregionincludeagriculture,fishing,textilecottageindustries,tourism,fishfarms,metalsmithingandmotordriventransportation.Traditionalfloatinggardensarealsoauniquelivelihoodpracticeinthisecosystem.333 334 335 336 337
Thepresenceofwidespreadhydroponic agricultureon Inle Lakehas given rise to aneconomicallyimportanttomatocropwithadistributionchainreachingintoThailand.338
Despitetheimplementationofawidevarietyofimprovementandrehabilitationprojectssince1992,thelakeisshrinkingeveryyear.xxxviFurthermore,in2010thewaterlevelofthelakedroppedtoitslowestlevelin50years.339Lowlakewaterlevelsandshrinkingopenlakeareadirectlyimpactlakeecologicalsystemsandtheabilityoflocalpeopletocarryoutlakebased livelihoods.Lakewaterquality isalsodegradingdue to theuseofchemicalfertilizersandpesticidesforhydroponicagriculture.Lakewaterisnolongersafefordrinkingand lake-borneecologiesare struggling toadjust tohighchemical andnutrient levels.Twentyyearsofexposuretotheneurotoxinsinchemicalpesticidesandfertilizersandalackof knowledgeonhow to safelyusepesticidesaredirectlyaffecting localpeople’s health.340 341
xxxviReasonsforshrinkingaredebated.There isspeculationthat ithasmainlyhastodowiththefloatinggardensandlesswithupstreamsedimentationandgeneralwatershedissues,Othersarguethat“upstream”threatsinthewatershedaremainlytoblame-shiftingcultivation,irrigationanddeforestation.Changingclimatechangepatternsarealsoanotherpossiblefactor.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
79
“Inle Lake deterioration is the serious concern for the local people, business men and other different stakeholders. … Huge problems lie ahead and the water level has gone down quite steep. … The problem is urgent it will not go away soon. The problem requires massive infrastructure resources not just money but technical and for those of us who believe individual and collective to make the difference and do this together from donors to private sector, NGOs and government.” – in opening remarks 30 July 2010 meeting of The Environment Thematic Working Group Meeting.
UNagencies,governmentandnationalconservationNGOFREDAhavesetupanenvironmentsteeringcommittee.Oneoftheinitiativesistotoco-ordinatetheidentificationofenvironmentalprotectionactivities to implementaround InleLakewith local communities.TheGlobalEnvironmentFacilitywillfund0.5millionfor10projectsaroundthelake.342 343 344
5.6 Illegal Wildlife Trade
IllegaltradeinwildlifeisrampantinBurma.Manywildlifespecies,oftentimes endangered, aresmuggledthroughBurma’sporousborders,especiallyalongborderwithYunnanProvince,China.Oneof themost charismatic speciessmuggled is theAsianelephant,which are especially prized fortheir ivory.Up to250elephantshavebeensmuggledtoThailandtowork in thetourismsector inthepastdecade,mainlythroughThreePagodasPass.345
ArecentreportbytheNGOTRAFFICobserves that non-governmentcontrolledareas in thenorthofBurmaborderingChina,IndiaandThailand, play amajor role infacilitating regional trade inbigcats and other endangeredspecies:“Partsandderivativesofbig cats and live animals aresourced inMyanmar, Thailand,LaoPDR,MalaysiaandIndiaandtraffickedacrossnationalbordersinto these non-governmentcontrolledareaswhere theyarestored,wholesaledandretailedtolocalandinternationalbuyers”346.
Figure 8 Black Bear being traded at Sop Lwe, Mekong river, Shan State. Wild animals are sold and sent through Lao to China and Vietnam. LNDO 2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
80
IntheChinesebordertownofMongLainShanState,speciesforsaleinthemarketincludedblackbears,macaques,smallprimates,pangolins,andrarebirds.347Hides,leopardandtigerskins,deerhorn,andliveBurmesestartortoisesandcobrascanalsobefoundthere.SomeoftheseliveanimalsareontheInternationalUnionfortheConservationofNature’s“RedList”ofcriticallyendangeredanimals.348OtherwildlifefromShanStateboundforChinaincludesotters,chameleons,grasslizards,snakes,crickets,dungbeetlesandgeckos.349SuchblackmarketgoodscanalsobefoundinmanyofBurma’sbordermarkets.
5.7 Climate Change
AccordingtoarecentADBreport,theSoutheastAsiaregionishighlyvulnerabletoclimatechange“with itsextensive,heavilypopulatedcoastlines; largeagricultural sectors;andlargesectionsofthepopulationlivingunder$2oreven$1aday.”350Inrecentyearstherehasbeenanincreaseofdroughts,floods,tropicalcyclonesandheatwaves;ifnoactionistakenthepeopleandenvironmentintheregionarelikelytosuffer(onaverage)morethantherestoftheworld.351TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)reportsthatlowlyingcoastalareas,smallislandsanddeltaslikethoseoftheIrrawaddy,Salween,SittaungandKaladanriversinBurmaareatseriousriskofsealevelrise,especiallyduringcyclonesandfloods.Sealevelrisewilleventuallydisplacemillionsfromthedenselypopulatedandfertileplainsandcoastalcommunities.
Climatechangeisalsoexpectedtoincreasewatershortagesanddroughtsinsomeareas.There isevidence that theHimalayanglaciers that feedBurma’smain riversareslowlymelting.352ThismeansthatovertimeBurma’sriverswillsoonlosesignificantamountsofwaterflowandvolume.Combinedwiththeflow-changingeffectsofdozensofdamsinBurmaandChina,waterwillbecomeincreasinglyscarce,resultinginmoredamagetobothbiodiversityandlocallivelihoods.
TheBerlin-basedclimatewatchdog,Germanwatch, rankedBurmaas the secondworstcountryaffectedbyextremeweathereventscausedbyclimatechangefrom1990to2008.Thegroupsaidthat“poorerdevelopingcountriesareoftenhitmuchharder…theseresultsunderscoretheparticularvulnerabilityofpoorcountriestoclimaticrisks,despitethefactthatabsolutemonetarydamagesaremuchhigherinrichercountries.”353ThereportalsorankedBurmaastheworst-hitcountryintheworldin2008duetotheimpactofCycloneNargis,whichdevastatedtheIrrawaddydeltainearlyMaythatyear,killinganestimated150,000people.About2.5yearslater,CycloneGirihitthewesterncoastofArakanStateonOctober22,2010whichisconsideredtobethesecondworstdamagingcycloneafterNargisinBurmaonrecord.Atleast45peopledied,70,975lefthomeless,15,000housescompletelydestroyedwithatotalofatleast200,000peopleaffectedand7,081hectaresofagriculturallanddestroyed.354
BurmeseweatherexpertspointoutthatclimatechangehasbeenshorteningandshiftingBurma’smonsoonpatternsince1977.355ReducedrainbringingstormactivityintheBayofBengalandincreasedfrequencyandintensityofextremeweathereventshas ledtoanincreaseinheatindicesandadecreaseinannualrainfall.356 357BetweenJanuaryandJuly2010southernandeasternShanState,Karen,MonandKarenniStates,aswellaslower
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
81
Sagaing,southernPegu,IrrawaddyandTennasserimDivisionshadabout20%lessrainthaninanaverageyear.358
Dr.TunLwin,aformerdirectorgeneraloftheDepartmentofMeteorologyandHydrology,sayshisanalysisshowsthatextremeweatherevents,suchastornados,stormsandlightning,haveincreasedinfrequencysince2006.Therewasnotasingletornadoinalmost50years’timesince1958.Butintheperiodfrom2006to2009thenumberoftornadoeswas16,11,8,and16intherespectiveconsecutiveyears.Anotherindicatorofextremeweatheristhatthenumberoflightning-causeddeathsincreasedtoashighas100between2006and2009. 359Theweatherexpertexplainedthatthemaincauseofextremeweathereventsisthatthemonsoonperiodhasshortened,thepre-monsoonandpost-monsoonperiodshavebecomelonger,thelikelihoodofcumulonimbuscloudstoformishigherwhichintheendcreatestornadoes,strongwinds,lightningandisolatedheavyrain.360TheMyanmarTimesalsoreportedthat2010summersetnewheatrecordsinsomeareasofthecountrybecauseoftheeffectofElNinoin2009-2010.
Compared to industrialized countries, andevendeveloping countries,Burma’s carbonfootprintisminimal,mostlybecauseofthelackofindustryandveryfewcarsonapercapitabasis.Widespreaddeforestationinthecountry,however,meansthatithascontributedtolargevolumesof carbon,an important factor inglobalwarming. Inaddition, the largeshallowreservoirsofthedamsproducemethane,whichisapowerfulgreenhousegas.361 Rice cultivation infields thatarekeptflooded through thewholegrowingperiodalsoproducesmethanegas.362
AlthoughBurmaisnotabigcontributortogreenhousegases,thecountrycouldplayanimportant role in climate changemitigation, for example throughREDDmechanisms.However initiatives suchas theseare controversial.REDD,or reducedemissions fromdeforestationanddegradation,developedin2005fromagroupofcountriescalledtheCoalitionforRainforestNations.363Itisbasedontheideamakingpaymentstogovernments,companies, and forest owners in the South to discourage deforestation and forestdegradation.364 In2007attheConferenceofthePartiestoUNFCCCinBali(COP-13),anagreedtextonREDDwasoutlined,knownasREDD+.REDD+includesnotjustdiscouragingdeforestationandforestdegradationbut‘conservation’,‘sustainablemanagementofforests’,andenhancementofcarbonstocks.xxxvii
Asexplainedearlierinthisreport,in2010theBurmesegovernmentexpressedinterestinREDD+butitwasmutuallyagreedthattheywouldnotformallyproceedwithanapplicationtojoinatthistime.UN-REDDishowevercurrentlysupportingrepresentativesfromcivilsocietyorganizationsandMinistryof Forestryofficials to attendREDD+ trainings andworkshops(seesection3.6.3).
ThereismuchdebatesurroundingREDDprograms.REDD-Monitor,awebsitethatsharesinformation about howREDD is developing explains that REDD is one of themost
xxxvii Policyapproachesandpositiveincentivesonissuesrelatingtoreducingemissionsfromdeforestationandforestdegradationindevelopingcountries;andtheroleofconservation,sustainablemanagementofforestsandenhancementofforestcarbonstocksindevelopingcountries”,seeUNFCCCCOP13,http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf#page=8
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
82
controversialnewissuesintheclimatechangedebate,andthatREDD+hasactivitiesthatcouldhavenegativeimpactsonindigenouspeople,localcommunitiesandforests:
“1. “conservation” soundsgood,but thehistoryof theestablishmentofnational parks includes large scale evictions and loss of rights forindigenouspeoplesandlocalcommunities.
2. “sustainablemanagement of forests” could include subsidies tocommercialloggingoperationsinold-growthforests,indigenouspeoples’territoryorinvillagers’communityforests.
3. “enhancementofforestcarbonstocks”couldresultinconversionofland(includingforests)toindustrialtreeplantations,withseriousimplicationsforbiodiversity,forestsandlocalcommunities.”365
Point3wasaddressedinasafeguardoutlinedintheCancunagreementattheUNFCCCCOP16inCancunin2010.xxxviiiIfthereareadequatesafeguardsandpoliticalwilltoimplementREDD+, then communitiesmaybenefit from theprogram.However, so far indigenouspeoplesrightshavenotbeenadequatelyrecognizedorprotectedinanyagreementsonREDD.366 367
6. CONCLUSION
InordertotakestepstowardsecologicallyandsociallyresponsibledevelopmentinBurma,Burmamusthaveasoundpolicyframeworkforenvironmentalprotectionandsustainabledevelopment that enables citizens to take part in decisionmaking about their owndevelopment,andensuresresponsibleprivatesectorinvestment.Untilthen,newforeigninvestorsinvestinginenergy,extractiveandplantationsectorsshouldrefrainfrominvesting.Existinginvestorsshouldimmediatelyceaseallproject-relatedwork-particularlyinsensitiveareasthroughoutBurma-untiladequatesafeguardsareinplacetoensureinvestmentdoesnotleadtounnecessarydestructionofthenaturalenvironmentandlocallivelihoods.Atthesametime,InternationalNGOsandUNagenciesshouldensurepeoplearerecognizedaskeyactorsintheirowndevelopment,ratherthanpassiverecipientsofcommoditiesandservices;andcivilsocietyorganizationsshouldempowercommunitiesthroughoutBurmatounderstandtheirrights.
xxxviii“Actionsareconsistentwiththeconservationofnaturalforestsandbiologicaldiversity,ensuringthatactionsreferredtoinparagraph70ofthisdecisionarenotusedfortheconversionofnaturalforests,butareinsteadusedtoincentivizetheprotectionandconservationofnaturalforestsandtheirecosystemservices,andtoenhanceothersocialandenvironmentalbenefits”,seeannex1paragraph2(e),UNFCCCCOP16http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_16/application/pdf/cop16_lca.pdf
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
83
1 UNDP,“HumanDevelopmentIndex2010rankings”,http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/,lastaccessed28November2010.
2 SeanTurnell,“Burma’sEconomy2010:AFreshLookatSomeElementalIssues”,BurmaEconomicWatch,MacquarieUniversity,September2010.
3 BurmaProject,OpenSociety Institute. “EthnicGroups”,http://www3.soros.org/burma/CRISIS/ethnic.html,lastaccessed2July2009.
4 Shanta Foundation,“MyanmarToday”, lastupdated2008, http://www.shantafoundation.org/pages/myanmar.html,lastaccessed19May2009.
5 RegionalOfficeforSouth-EastAsia,WorldHealthOrganization.“MyanmarandBirthSpacing:AnOverview”,http://www.searo.who.int/linkfiles/family_planning_fact_sheets_myanmar.pdf, last accessed19May2009.
6 “Copenhagen Declaration”, 22 Sept. 2002, http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?page=asem-copenhagen_burmadecl,lastaccessed14May2002.
7 BurmaProject,OpenSociety Institute, “EthnicGroups”,http://www3.soros.org/burma/CRISIS/ethnic.html,lastaccessed2July2009.
8 ConservationInternational,“BiodiversityHotspots”,http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/Pages/default.aspx,lastaccessed18May2009.
9 Milieudefensie—FriendsoftheEarthNetherlands,SanctionedbutNotStopped:ResearchonTimberTradebetweentheEuropeanUnionandBurma,February2009,http://www.foeeurope.org/activities/forests/Milieudefensie%2008-20-1736%20Rapport%20Birma%20M%20lowres.pdf.
10 AdrianLevy,CathyScott-Clark,andDavidHarrison.“SavetheRhino:KillthePeople:CreatingaBurmeseNatureReserve”,EnvironmentalDemocracy,MichaelMason,Earthscan,1999,http://www.earthscan.co.uk/Portals/0/Files/Sample%20Chapters/9781853836176.pdf,lastaccessed19Jun.2009.
11 AndrewW. Tordoff, et al.,UNDPandBirdlife International,Myanmar: InvestmentOpportunities inBiodiversityConservation,2005.
12 ADB,GreaterMekongSubregionAtlasoftheEnvironment,AsianDevelopmentBank,2004.
13 Smythies1986, cited inMyanmar: InvestmentOpportunities inBiodiversityConservation.UNDPandBirdLifeInternational,2005.
14 UNDPandBirdlifeInternational,Myanmar:InvestmentOpportunitiesinBiodiversityConservation,2005.
15 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs,Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,GMS,Bangkok,2006.
16 UOhnInterview,“TheMangroveForests:Burma’sBestBiodefense”,TheIrrawaddy,Sept.2008,Vol.16No.9,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=14163,lastaccessed22Oct.2008.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
84
In this Report.
Disclaimer: “The list on the page 15 is intended as a list of peoples living in Burma. BEWG as a collective does not take a stand on which of these groups are indigenous or ethnic or simply part of the population living in Burma right now "
17 KarenEnvironmentalandSocialActionNetwork.KhoeKay:BiodiversityinPeril,Thailand,Jul.2008,http://www.salweenwatch.org/images/stories/downloads/brn/2008_009_24_khoekay.pdf, lastAccessed9February2009.
18 AllArakanStudents’andYouths’Congress,SupplyandCommand:NaturalGasinWesternBurmaSettoEntrenchMilitary Rule, Jul. 2006, http://www.shwe.org/media-releases/publications/file/SUPPLYANDCOMMAND.pdf,lastaccessed2July2009.
19 BurmaRiversNetwork, “MekongRiver”,http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/burmas-rivers/mekong.html,lastaccessed2July2009.
20 WilliamBoot,“PipelinePolitics”,TheIrrawaddy,Vol.15.No.10.,Oct.2007,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=8905,lastaccessed15Jun.2009.
21 ThomasHogue,AssociatedPress.“OilCompaniesFuellingBurmaJunta”,TheStar,2Oct.2007,http://www.thestar.com/article/262493,lastaccessed2July2009.
22 CIAWorld Factbook – Burma, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html#top.
23 BritishPetroleumPLC, StatisticalReviewofWorldEnergy, June2010,http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2008/STAGING/local_assets/2010_downloads/natural_gas_section_2010.pdf,lastaccessed16Feb.2011.
24 CIAWorld Factbook – Burmahttps://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html#top,lastaccessed20February2011.
25 TheGulfToday,“SinopecfindsoilandgasdepositsinMyanmar”,7January2011,http://gulftoday.ae/portal/ddd95ecc-919c-442f-a971-2eea5fe1cbc3.aspx
26 TheGulfToday,“SinopecconfirmsgasfindinMyanmar”14January2011http://sinopeccorpmalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/01/sinopec-confirms-gas-find-in-myanmar.html
27 RajeevJayaswal,“IndianOil,OilIndiaintalkstobuyintoEssar’sMyanmargasblock”24Aug.2010http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/energy/oil--gas/Indian-Oil-Oil-India-in-talks-to-buy-into-Essars-Myanmar-gas-block/articleshow/6423763.cms
28 “Myanmareconomy:foreigninvestmenthassurged”EIUViewsWire,NewYork,September29,2010
29 ADB,GreaterMekongSubregionAtlasoftheEnvironment,AsianDevelopmentBank,2004.
30 Mongabay.com.“MyanmarDeforestationRatesandRelatedForestryFigures”,http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Myanmar.htm,lastaccessed7July2009.
31 HumanRightsWatch,Burma’sGemTradeandHumanRightsAbuses,29July2008,http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4896c48d1e.html,lastaccessed16February2011.
32 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs,Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,GMS.Bangkok, 2006.
33 TunMyint,APerspectiveonBurma,www.ref-msea.org/burma.pdf,lastAccessed12February2009.
34 PeterGutter,EnvironmentalLawinBurma,LegalIssuesonBurmaJournal,BurmaLawyersCouncil,No9,August2001,http://burmalibrary.org/docs/LIOB09-environment_and_law_in_burma.htm.
35 PeterGutter,EnvironmentalLawinBurma,LegalIssuesonBurmaJournal,BurmaLawyersCouncil,No9,August2001,http://burmalibrary.org/docs/LIOB09-environment_and_law_in_burma.htm.
36 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs,Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,GMS.Bangkok, 2006.
37 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs,Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,GMS,Bangkok, 2006.
38 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs.Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report.GMS.Bangkok: 2006.
39 AlanK.J.Tan,“PreliminaryAssessmentofMyanmar’sEnvironmentallaw”,FacultyofLaw,NationalUniversityofSingapore,Asia-PacificCentreforEnvironmentalLaw(APCEL),03June2003.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
85
40 BEWGmeetingwithUNEP,meetingminutes,AsiaInstituteofTechnology,Bangkok,10September2010.
41 AlanK.J.Tan,“PreliminaryAssessmentofMyanmar’sEnvironmentallaw”,FacultyofLaw,NationalUniversityofSingapore,Asia-PacificCentreforEnvironmentalLaw(APCEL),03June2003.
42 TheInternationalAssociationforImpactAssessment,“PrinciplesofEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentBestPractice,”http://www.iaia.org/modx/assets/files/Principles%20of%20IA_web.pdf,lastaccessed30June2010.
43 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs.Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,GMS,Bangkok, 2006.
44 AccordingtoconversationwithBurmeseNGOin2006.ThesameNGOhasconductedmanyotherEIAsforotherdamsslatedonriversinnorthernBurma.
45 MyoNyunt,“DevelopmentofEnvironmentalM.anagementMechanisminMyanmar”,Asia-EuropeJournal,Vol6,2008.
46 Aimforhumanrightshttp://www.aimforhumanrights.org/about-us/,lastaccessed23November2010.
47 “TheUnionshallprotectandconservenaturalenvironment.”
48 “ThePyidaungsuHluttawshallhavetherighttoenactlawsfortheentireoranypartoftheUnionrelatedtomattersprescribedinScheduleOneoftheUnionLegislativeList.ScheduleOneoftheUnionLegislativeList:Section6.Energy,Electricity,MiningandForestrySector(c)Minerals,mines,safetyofmineworkers,andenvironmental conservationand restoration; (f) Forests; and (g) Environmentalprotectionandconservationincludingwildlife,naturalplantsandnaturalareas.”
49 “Ch.4Self-AdministeredDivisionandSelf-AdministeredZone(EthnicStates)LeadingBodiesSection196.ThelegislativepowerrelatingtothematterslistedintheScheduleThreeforrespectiveDivisionsorZonesareallottedtotheSelf-AdministeredDivisionortheSelf-AdministeredZoneLeadingBodies.ScheduleThree,ListofLegislationof theLeadingBodyofSelf-AdministeredDivisionorSelf-AdministeredAreaSection7.ConservationandPreservationofForestSection8.PreservationofNaturalEnvironment inAccordwithLawPromulgatedbytheUnion.”
50 Chapter8,Citizen,FundamentalRightsandDutiesoftheCitizens:Section390.EverycitizenhasthedutytoassisttheUnionincarryingoutthefollowingmatters:(a)preservationandsafeguardingofculturalheritage; (b) environmental conservation;(c) striving fordevelopmentofhuman resources; and (d)protectionandpreservationofpublicproperty.
51 BEWGmeetingwithUNEP,AsiaInstituteofTechnology,Bangkok,10September2010.
52 NCEA,MinistryofForestry,UnitedNationsEnvironmentProgrammeRegionalCentreforAsiaandthePacific,NationalSustainableDevelopmentStrategyforMyanmar,2009.
53 BEWGmeetingwithUNEP,AsiaInstituteofTechnology,Bangkok,10September2010.
54 CBD,SecretariatoftheConventiononBiologicalDiversity.“SustainingLifeonEarth”,2000,http://www.cbd.int/convention/guide.shtml,lastaccessed16February2009.
55 CBD,TextoftheConventiononBiologicalDiversity,http://www.cbd.int/convention/convention.shtml,lastaccessed31August2010.
56 ZaoNoam,Paul SeinTwa,KatrinaWinters, “IndigenousPeoplesandBurma’sNBSAP:AStrategy forParticipation”, AResourcePaper for the3rdAsiaRegionalConferenceon IndigenousKnowledgeandBiodiversity,Lijiang,Yunnan,China,June2007.
57 ZaoNoam,Paul SeinTwa,KatrinaWinters, “IndigenousPeoplesandBurma’sNBSAP:AStrategy forParticipation”, AResourcePaper for the3rdAsiaRegionalConferenceon IndigenousKnowledgeandBiodiversity,Lijiang,Yunnan,China,June2007.
58 ZaoNoam,Paul SeinTwa,KatrinaWinters, “IndigenousPeoplesandBurma’sNBSAP:AStrategy forParticipation”, AResourcePaper for the3rdAsiaRegionalConferenceon IndigenousKnowledgeandBiodiversity,Lijiang,Yunnan,China,June2007.
59 BEWGmeetingwithUNEP,AsiaInstituteofTechnology,Bangkok,10September2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
86
60 ZaoNoam,Paul SeinTwa,KatrinaWinters, “IndigenousPeoplesandBurma’sNBSAP:AStrategy forParticipation”, AResourcePaper for the3rdAsiaRegionalConferenceon IndigenousKnowledgeandBiodiversity,Lijiang,Yunnan,China,June2007.
61 InternationalWorkingGrouponIndigenousAffairs,“DeclarationontheRightgsofIndigenousPeople”,http://www.iwgia.org/sw248.asp,lastaccessed5December2010.
62 InternationalLaborOrganization,IndigenousandTribalPeoplesConvention1989,http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/cgi-lex/convde.pl?C169,lastaccessed28February2011.
63 AdamH.Oswell,“TheBigCatTradeinMyanmarandThailand”,TrafficSouthEastAsia,2010.
64 Mizzimanews,Burma’sWildCatsatRisk,http://www.mizzima.com/news/inside-burma/1145-burmas-wild-cats-at-risk.html
65 “Burma’sIllegalTradeinEndangeredAnimals”,http://www.thirteen.org/scienceandnature/burma-illegal-trade-in-endangered-animals,lastaccessed12February2009.
66 AdaptationLearningMechanism,www.adaptationlearning.net/program/myanmar-national-adaptation-programme-action-napa,lastaccessed31August2010.
67 MeetingwithUNDPUN-REDDRegionalCo-ordinator,UNoffice,Bangkok,20September2010,andfollowupcorrespondence15November2010.
68 InternalDocument
69 FREDA,FREDAorganizationalbrochure,Yangon,Myanmar,2010
70 ECODEV,organizationalinformation,2011.
71 UNDPwebsite, “UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramMyanmar”, http://www.mm.undp.org/, lastaccessed20Feb2011.
72 UNDPwebsite, “UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramMyanmar”, http://www.mm.undp.org/, lastaccessed20Feb2011.
73 UNEPcorrespondencewithBEWG,21December2010.
74 MyanmarDepartmentofMeteorologyandHydrology,“AirPollutionandRelatedLawsandPolicies inMyanmar”,PowerPointpresentation,(yearunspecified).
75 BEWGmeetingwithUNEP,meetingminutes,AsiaInstituteofTechnology,Bangkok,10September2010.
76 MeetingwithUNDPUN-REDDRegionalCo-ordinator,UNoffice,Bangkok,20September2010,andfollowupcorrespondence15November2010.
77 DepartmentofAgriculture(DAP),MinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation(MoAI),“MyanmarAgricultureataGlance”,UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2009.
78 GlobalWitness,AConflictofInterests:TheUncertainFutureofBurma’sForests,London,UK,2003
79 GlobalWitness,AConflictofInterests:TheUncertainFutureofBurma’sForests,London,UK,2003
80 GlobalWitness,AConflictofInterests:TheUncertainFutureofBurma’sForests,London,UK,2003
81 PersonalcommunicationbyforeignresearcherwithretiredBurmesegovernmentofficialinJuly2010.
82 PersonalcommunicationbyforeignresearcherwithretiredBurmesegovernmentofficialinJuly2010.
83 InterviewconductedbyananonymousforeignresearcherinJuly2008.
84 FoodSecurityWorkingGroup(FSWG),“LandTenure:AfoundationforfoodsecurityinMyanmar’suplands”,BriefingPaper,2010,http://www.myanmarfswg.net/.
85 InterviewbyforeignresearcherinJuly2009.
86 KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG),Tryants,Tycoons,andTigers:YuzanaCompanyRavagesBurma’sHugawngValley,2010,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs09/TyrantsTycoonsandTigers.pdf,lastaccessed26March2011.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
87
87 KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG),Tryants,Tycoons,andTigers:YuzanaCompanyRavagesBurma’sHugawngValley,2010,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs09/TyrantsTycoonsandTigers.pdf,lastaccessed26March2011.
88 KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG),Tryants,Tycoons,andTigers:YuzanaCompanyRavagesBurma’sHugawngValley,2010,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs09/TyrantsTycoonsandTigers.pdf,lastaccessed26March2011.
89 KachinNewsGroup(KNG),“HVDAPCmembersforciblyconfinedtoHugawngValley”,9October2007.
90 KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG),Tryants,Tycoons,andTigers:YuzanaCompanyRavagesBurma’sHugawngValley,2010,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs09/TyrantsTycoonsandTigers.pdf,lastaccessed26March2011.
91 KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG),Tryants,Tycoons,andTigers:YuzanaCompanyRavagesBurma’sHugawngValley,2010,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs09/TyrantsTycoonsandTigers.pdf,lastaccessed26March2011.
92 KoHtwe,“FarmersFightfortheirLandinKachinState”Irrawaddy,15October2010,http://www.irrawaddy.cc/article.php?art_id=19744.
93 KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup(KDNG),Tryants,Tycoons,andTigers:YuzanaCompanyRavagesBurma’sHugawngValley,2010,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs09/TyrantsTycoonsandTigers.pdf,lastaccessed26March2011.
94 NangKhamKaew,“KachinCourtClearsYuzanaTycoon”,DemocraticVoiceofBurma,13October2010.http://www.dvb.no/news/kachin-court-clears-yuzana-tycoon/12212.
95 MizzimaNews,“Kachinteacher,landactivisttostandinPhakantforNDF”,24September2010,http://www.mizzima.com/edop/interview/4398-kachin-teacher-land-activist-to-stand-in-phakant-for-ndf.html
96 KhinHninHtet,“Court‘cheats’Yuzanalandgrabvictims”,DemocraticVoiceofBurma.January11.2011,www.burmanet.org/.../democratic-voice-of-burma-court-‘cheats’-yuzana-land-grab-victims-–-khin-hnin-htet
97 SaiZomHseng,“Activistinhidingtoescapearrest”,Irrawaddy,January202011,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=20574
98 KachinNewsGroup(KNG),“TwoKachinwomenrapedbyYuzanaCompanyworkers”,16November2010.
99 SeanTurnell,“Burma’sEconomy2010:AFreshLookatSomeElementalIssues”,BurmaEconomicWatch,MacquarieUniversity,September2010.
100 DepartmentofAgriculture(DAP),MinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation(MoAI),“MyanmarAgricultureataGlance”,UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2009.
101 DeptofAgric.Planning(DAP),“MyanmarAgricultureinBrief”,UnionofMyanmarGovernment.MoAI,2010.
102 TransnationalInstitute(TNI),“AlternativeDevelopmentofBusinessasUsual:China’sOpiumSubstitutionPolicyinBurmaandLaos”,DrugPolicyBriefingNo.33.November2010.
103 DepartmentofAgricultureandPlanning(DAP),MoAI,CDROM.UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2008.
104 InternationalCrisisGroup(ICG),“China’sMyanmarStrategy:Elections,EthnicPoliticsandEconomics”,AsiaBriefingNo.112,21September2010.
105 AungHlaTun,“ChineseinvestmentinMyanmartops$8billionthisyear”,Reuters,16August2010.
106 MoeSetandMinLwin,ChinatoloanBurma30billionYuan,Irrawaddy,05October2010http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=19520,
107 InternationalCrisisGroup(ICG),“China’sMyanmarStrategy:Elections,EthnicPoliticsandEconomics”,AsiaBriefingNo.112,21September2010.
108 InternationalCrisisGroup(ICG),“China’sMyanmarStrategy:Elections,EthnicPoliticsandEconomics”,AsiaBriefingNo.112,21September2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
88
109 SawYanNaing,“ThailandBeginsforcedRepatriationofKarenrefugees”,Irrawaddy,5Feb2010.
110 SeanTurnell,“Burma’sEconomy2010:AFreshLookatSomeElementalIssues”,BurmaEconomicWatch,MacquarieUniversity,September2010.
111 EarthRightsInternational,“TheBurma-ChinaPipelines:HumanRightsAbuses,ApplicableLaw,andRevenueSecrecy”,SituationBrieferNo.1,March2011,ChiangMai,ThailandandWashingtonD.C.
112 InternationalCrisisGroup,“China’sMyanmarStrategy:Elections,EthnicPoliticsandEconomics”,UpdateBriefing,AsiaBriefingNo112,Beijing/Jakarta/Brussels,21September2010
113 ShweGasMovement,“CorridorofPower:China’sTrans-BurmaOilandGasPipelines”,September2009.
114 EarthRightsInternational,“TheBurma-ChinaPipelines:HumanRightsAbuses,ApplicableLaw,andRevenueSecrecy”,SituationBrieferNo.1,March2011.
115 EarthRightsInternational,“TheBurma-ChinaPipelines:HumanRightsAbuses,ApplicableLaw,andRevenueSecrecy”,SituationBrieferNo.1,March2011.
116 Since1996,EarthRightsInternationalhasproducednumerouspublicationsonthehumanrightsimpactsoftheYadanaandYetagunpipelines.Seewww.earthrights.org/publications.
117 EarthRights International, “BrokenEthics: TheNorwegianGovernment’s Investments inOil andGasCompaniesOperatinginBurma(Myanmar),”December2010
118 EarthRightsInternational,“EnergyInsecurity,”July2010.
119 EarthRights International, “BrokenEthics: TheNorwegianGovernment’s Investments inOil andGasCompaniesOperatinginBurma(Myanmar),”December2010
120 EarthRights International, “BrokenEthics: TheNorwegianGovernment’s Investments inOil andGasCompaniesOperatinginBurma(Myanmar),”December2010
121 SawYangNaingandLawiWeng“ECAfraidofLosingPoll inEthnicAreas”http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=19498,Irrawaddy,05October2010.
122 SawYangNaingandLawiWeng“ECAfraidofLosingPoll inEthnicAreas”http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=19498,Irrawaddy,05October2010.
123 RefugeesInternational,“Thailand:NoSafeRefuge”,http://refugeesinternational.org/policy/field-report/thailand-no-safe-refuge,24March2011,lastaccessed27March2011.
124 SalweenWatchStatementtoPrimeMinisterAbhisitVejjajiva,“StatementcallingfortheHatgyiDamprojecttobestoppedimmediately”,March2011.
125 Al Jazeera, “ThousandsfleeMyanmarclashes”,8November2010,http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2010/11/2010118479326824.html,
126 LawiWeng,“DKBAtroopsseizethreepagodapass”,Irrawaddy,8November2010,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=20004
127 WaiMoe,“MaeSotburdenedbythousandsofBurmeserefugees”,Irrawaddy,8November2010,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=20005.
128 SeanTurnell,“Burma’sEconomy2010:AFreshLookatSomeElementalIssues”,BurmaEconomicWatch,MacquarieUniversity,September2010.
129 YukiAkimoto,“PoisedtoEngage:TheADBinBurma”,inFocusAsien,Vol.34Asienhaus,2009.
130 SeanTurnell,“Burma’sEconomy2010:AFreshLookatSomeElementalIssues”,BurmaEconomicWatch,MacquarieUniversity,September2010.
131 AsianDevelopmentBank,BuildingaSustainableEnergyFuture:TheGreaterMekongSubregion,ADB,Philippines,2009
132 ADB,“EastWestEconomicCorridorStrategyActionPlan”,ADB,May2009,http://www.adb.org/GMS/Economic-Corridors/EWEC-SAP.pdf.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
89
133 MarwaanMacanMarkar,“South-eastAsianHighwayhitsroadblockinBurma”,IPSnews,http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=52671
134 ADB,“EastWestEconomicCorridorStrategyActionPlan”,ADB,May2009,http://www.adb.org/GMS/Economic-Corridors/EWEC-SAP.pdf
135 BangkokPost,“GoodSEZ’smakegoodneighbors”,05July2010,http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/asia/184970/good-sezs-make-good-neighbours
136 International Rivers, “MekongPowerGrid”, http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/1775, lastaccessed17February2011.
137 InternationalRivers,“Takingawaytheriver:theMekongPowerGrid”,http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/1780,lastaccessed17February2011.
138 EmailcorrespondencewithDr.CarlMiddletonSouthEastAsiaProgramDirectorInternationalRivers,17February2011
139 Dr.CarlMiddleton,“RegionalElectricityPlanningandTransboundaryRural-UrbanDivide”,InternationalSeminaronRural-UrbanTensions,Violence,&ConflictTransformation:ThailandinGlobalComparativePerspective, FacultyofPoliticalScience,ChulalongkornUniversity26-27August2010,ChulalongkornUniversity,Bangkok,Thailand.
140 YukiAkimoto,“PoisedtoEngage:TheADBinBurma”,inFocusAsien,Vol.34Asienhaus,2009.
141 BIMSTEC,“JointStatementoftheThirteenthBIMSTECMinisterialMeetingNayPyiTaw,22January2011”,http://www.bimstec.org/13th_MM_details.html,lastaccessed11April2011.
142 CliffordMcCoy,“CapitalizingtheThai-Myanmarborder”,AsiaTimes,July21,2007,http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/IF21Ae02.html
143 SaiSilp,“ContractFarmersFaceStiffChallenges”,Irrawaddy,April202006,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=5667.
144 CliffordMcCoy,“CapitalizingtheThai-Myanmarborder”,AsiaTimes,July21,2007,http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/IF21Ae02.html
145 EmailcorrespondencebetweenBEWGandFocusontheGlobalSouth,21February2011.
146 EmailcorrespondencebetweenBEWGandFocusontheGlobalSouth,21February2011.
147 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs.Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report.GMS.Bangkok: 2006.
148 ASEANmediarelease,June162008.
149 “PostNargisAnalysis:TheOthersideoftheStory”,http://www.dhf.uu.se/pdffiler/burma_post_nargi_analysis.pdf,October2008.
150 TCG,“Post-NargisRecoveryandPreparednessPlan”,http://www.aseansec.org/CN-PONREPP.pdf,December2008
151 YukiAkimoto,“PoisedtoEngage:TheADBinBurma”,inFocusAsien,Vol.34Asienhaus,2009.
152 NoleenHeyzerandProfessor JosephStiglitz,“TranscriptofPressConferenceontheESCAP/MyanmarSecondPartnershipDevelopmentRoundtableandForum”,Singapore21December2009.
153 NoleenHeyzerandProfessor JosephStiglitz,“TranscriptofPressConferenceontheESCAP/MyanmarSecondPartnershipDevelopmentRoundtableandForum”,Singapore21December2009.
154 Mungpi,“‘Economicsandpoliticsinseperable’StiglitztellsBurma,Mizzimaonline,http://www.mizzima.com/news/inside-burma/3173-economics-and-politics-inseparable-stiglitz-tells-burma.html17December2009.
155 Mungpi,“‘Economicsandpoliticsinseperable’StiglitztellsBurma”,Mizzima,http://www.mizzima.com/news/inside-burma/3173-economics-and-politics-inseparable-stiglitz-tells-burma.html17December2009.
156 TransparencyInternational,“CorruptionPerceptionsIndex2010results”,http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/results,lastaccessed16November2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
90
157 MoeSetandMinLwin,“ChinatoloanBurma30billionYuan”,Irrawaddy,05October2010,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=19520
158 TheaForbes,“ThaiengineeringgiantsignsTavoyportdeal”,Mizzimaonline,10November2010,http://www.mizzima.com/business/4563-thai-engineering-giant-signs-tavoy-port-deal.html
159 JosephAllchin,“IndiaslammedasThanShwevisitlooms”,TheDemocraticVoiceofBurma,21July2010.http://www.dvb.no/news/india-slammed-as-than-shwe-visit-looms/10833
160 IANS,“MyanmarMilitarychiefThanShweongoodwillvisittoIndia”,25July2010,TheTimesofIndia,http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Myanmar-military-chief-Than-Shwe-on-goodwill-visit-to-India-/articleshow/6213507.cms
161 IANS,“MyanmarMilitarychiefThanShweongoodwillvisittoIndia”,25July2010,TheTimesofIndia,http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Myanmar-military-chief-Than-Shwe-on-goodwill-visit-to-India-/articleshow/6213507.cms
162 Burma Rivers Network, “Save Burma’s Rivers”, http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/resources/publications/13/499.html,lastaccessed27March2011.
163 BurmaRiversNetwork,“StatementontheInternationalDayofActionforRivers,WaterandLife”,14March2009,http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/actions/brn-campaings.html,lastaccessed27March2011.
164 ShweGasMovementandBurmaRiversNetwork,“2010ElectionsWillLeavePeopleofBurmaintheDark”,5November2010,http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/actions/press-releases/23/464.html,lastaccessed27March2010.
165 KarenniDevelopmentResearchGroup.DamnedbyBurma’sGenerals: TheKarenni ExperiencewithHydropowerDevelopment fromLawpita to Salween.2006.<http://www.salweenwatch.org/images/stories/downloads/publications/dammed-eng.pdf>.Lastaccessed22June2009.
166 YukiAkimoto“Hydro-PoweringtheRegime”,TheIrrawaddy,Vol.12(6),June2004,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=3757,lastaccessed22Jun.2009.
167 MyanmarTimes,“HydropowerattractsbiginvestmentinMyanmar”,10Jan2011.
168 Interviewwithenvironmentalactivist,ChiangMai,March2011.
169 “HPID,ColencoPowerEngineeringLtdsignsagreementofconsultingservice”,TheNewLightofMyanmar,Vol.XVI(196),31October2008.
170 InternationalRivers,http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/1028,lastaccessed22June2010.
171 InternationalRivers,http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/1028,lastaccessed22June2010.
172 BurmaRiversNetwork,www.burmariversnetwork.org,lastaccessed22June2010.
173 BurmaRiversNetwork,www.burmariversnetwork.org,lastaccessed22June2010.
174 BurmaRiversNetwork,www.burmariversnetwork.org,lastaccessed22June2010.
175 BurmaRiversNetwork. “Irrawaddy/N’Mai/MaliDams”. <http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=71&Itemid=86>.Lastaccessed8Feb.2009.
176 BurmaRiversNetwork. “Irrawaddy/N’Mai/MaliDams”. <http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=71&Itemid=86>.Lastaccessed8Feb.2009.
177 KachinNews,KachinChurchesUnitedinRejectionofIrrawaddyMyitsonedam,10February2011,http://www.kachinnews.com/news/1852-kachin-churches-united-in-rejection-of-irrawaddy-myitsone-dam.html,citedon27March2011.
178 KachinNewsGroup,“BurmeseTroopsTrytoEnterKioAreasforDamSecurity”,17March2011,http://www.kachinnews.com/news/1872-burmese-troops-try-to-enter-kio-areas-for-dam-security.html, citedon27March2011.
179 InternationalRivers.“IrrawaddyMyitsoneDam”.<http://internationalrivers.org/en/southeast-asia/burma/myitsone-dam>.Lastaccessed22Jun.2009.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
91
180 Kachin Development Networking Group, Damming the Irrawaddy, Oct. 2007, http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/publications/english/dammingtheirrawaddy.pdf, lastaccessed22June2009.
181 InternationalRivers,“IrrawaddyMyitsoneDam”,http://internationalrivers.org/en/southeast-asia/burma/myitsone-dam,lastaccessed22June2009.
182 Palaung(Ta’ang)YouthNetworkGroup,UndertheBoot:TheBurmaArmyclearsthewayforChineseDamsontheShweliRiver,2007,availablefromhttp://www.burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/publications/english/underthebootenglishwithcover.pdf.
183 UNESCAP,“GeologicalMapofMyanmar”,UNESCAPEarthSciencesResearchDivision,1977.
184 InternationalRivers,“EarthquakestriggeredbyDams”,http://www.internationalrivers.org/node/3845,lastaccessed28March2011.
185 NewLightofMyanmar,“MoUfordevelopmentofUpperThanlwin(MongTon)Hydropowerproject”,12November2010.
186 ShanSAPAWAEnvironmentalOrganization.“RootsandResiliance:TasangDamThreatensWar-TornShanCommunities.”2009.Availablefromhttp://www.burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/publications/english/english%204.pdf.
187 MyanmarTimes,“HydropowerattractsbiginvestmentinMyanmar”,10Jan2011.
188 SalweenWatch. “Newsletter:Update:HatgyiDam:Abhisit-AppointedCommitteeRecommendsMoreStudy,butRefusestoStopEGAT’sdestructiveproject”,March2010.
189 RefugeesInternational,“Thailand:NoSafeRefuge”,http://refugeesinternational.org/policy/field-report/thailand-no-safe-refuge,24March2011,lastaccessed27March2011.
190 SalweenWatchStatement toPrimeMinisterAbhisitVejjajiva, “Statement calling for theHatgyiDamprojecttobestoppedimmediately”,March2011.
191 KayanWomen’sUnion,“DrowningtheGreenGhostsofKayanland-ImpactsoftheUpperPaunglaungDam inBurma”,2008,Availableathttp://www.burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/publications/english/drowninggreenghostsenglish.pdf.
192 KarenniDevelopmentandResearchGroup,“StoptheDamOffensiveagainsttheKarenni”,2011,Availableathttp://burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/publications/english/KarenniBriefer%20-%20English.pdf.
193 KayanWomen’sUnion,“DrowningtheGreenGhostsofKayanland-ImpactsoftheUpperPaunglaungDam inBurma”,2008,Availableathttp://www.burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/publications/english/drowninggreenghostsenglish.pdf.p1.
194 KayanWomen’sUnion,“DrowningtheGreenGhostsofKayanland-ImpactsoftheUpperPaunglaungDam inBurma”,2008,Availableathttp://www.burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/publications/english/drowninggreenghostsenglish.pdf.
195 ArakanOilWatch, “China’sEnergy-securityPlanDamages IndigenousPeoples’ Lives inBurma”,PressRelease,4June2010.
196 SeanTurnell,“Burma’sEconomy2010:AFreshLookatSomeElementalIssues”,BurmaEconomicWatch,MacquarieUniversity,September2010.
197 EarthRights International,“RevenueTransparency inBurma”,http://www.earthrights.org/campaigns/revenue-transparency-burma-0,lastaccessed,20February2011.
198 EarthRights International,“RevenueTransparency inBurma”,http://www.earthrights.org/campaigns/revenue-transparency-burma-0,lastaccessed,20February2011.
199 EarthRights International,“RevenueTransparency inBurma”,http://www.earthrights.org/campaigns/revenue-transparency-burma-0,lastaccessed,20February2011.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
92
200 EarthRightsInternational,“EnergyInsecurity:HowTotal,Chevron,andPTTEPContributetoHumanRightsViolations,FinancialSecrecyandHumanRightsViolationsinMyanmar”,EarthRightsInternational,July2010.
201 BurmaRiversNetwork, http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/energy-in-burma/oil-and-gas.html, lastaccessed21June2010.
202 ShweGasMovement,“CorridorofPower:China’sTrans-BurmaOilandGasPiplelines”,ShweGasMovement,September2009.
203 EarthRightsInternational,“EnergyInsecurity:HowTotal,Chevron,andPTTEPContributetoHumanRightsViolations,FinancialSecrecyandHumanRightsViolationsinMyanmar”,EarthRightsInternational,July2010.
204 HumanRightsFoundationofMonland,“CeasefireConcern,SecurityTightensinGasPipelineAreas”,5August2010,www.rehmonnya.org.
205 EarthRightsInternational,“EnergyInsecurity:HowTotal,Chevron,andPTTEPContributetoHumanRightsViolations,FinancialSecrecyandHumanRightsViolationsinMyanmar”,EarthRightsInternational,July2010.
206 EarthRightsInternational,“EnergyInsecurity:HowTotal,Chevron,andPTTEPContributetoHumanRightsViolations,FinancialSecrecyandHumanRightsViolationsinMyanmar”,EarthRightsInternational,July2010.
207 Transparency International, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009/cpi_2009_table,lastaccessed21June2010.
208 ArakanOilWatch,BlockingFreedom:ACaseStudyofChina’sOilandGasInvestmentinBurma,October2008.
209 SimonRoughneen,“GasRevenuesFundBurma’sNukeProgram”,http://www.worldpress.org/Asia/3586.cfm#down,lastaccessed24August2010.
210 ShweGasMovement,CorridorofPower:China’sTrans-BurmaOilandGasPiplelines,September2009.
211 TheShweGasMovement.“TheShweProject”,http://www.shwe.org/about-shwe/index_html,lastaccessed8Feb.2009.
212 EarthRightsInternational,http://www.earthrights.org/campaigns/shwe-gas-campaign,lastaccessed21June2010.
213 ShweGasMovement,“CorridorofPower:China’sTrans-BurmaOilandGasPiplelines”,ShweGasMovement,September2009.
214 ArakanOilWatch,“China’sEnergy-securityPlanDamagesIndigenousPeoples’LivesinBurma”,PressRelease,4June2010.
215 ShweGasMovement,CorridorofPower:China’sTrans-BurmaOilandGasPiplelines,ShweGasMovement,September2009.
216 ArakanOilWatch, “China’sEnergy-securityPlanDamages IndigenousPeoples’ Lives inBurma”PressRelease,4June2010.
217 EarthRightsInternational,http://www.earthrights.org/campaigns/shwe-gas-campaign.Lastaccessed21June2010.
218 ArakanOilWatch, “China’sEnergy-securityPlanDamages IndigenousPeoples’ Lives inBurma”PressRelease,4June2010.
219 ShweGasMovement,“CorridorofPower:China’sTrans-BurmaOilandGasPiplelines”,ShweGasMovement,September2009
220 ADB,GreaterMekongSubregionAtlasoftheEnvironment,AsianDevelopmentBank,2004.
221 Mongabay.com,“MyanmarDeforestationRatesandRelatedForestryFigures”.http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Myanmar.htm,lastaccessed7Jul.2009.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
93
222 EikiBergandHenkvanHoutum.RoutingBordersBetweenTerritories,Discourses,andPractices,Ashgate,2003,http://books.google.com/Books?id=2wZKtke1bcEC&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&dq=kachin+ceasefire+ga ve+SPDC+control+of+gems&source=bl&ots=4OthUZLd47&sig=e5wb4AF63TuI6DP4xbw_UIDdNUY&hl=en&ei=S7aOSYy7DZjEkAXw-rG3DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPP1,M1, lastaccessed19May2009.
223 MarwannMacan-Markar,IPS.“Burma/China:Avoid‘BloodJade’OlympicSouvenirs–Activists”,7August2008,http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43475,lastaccessed19May2009.
224 EikiBergandHenkvanHoutum,RoutingBordersBetweenTerritories,Discourses,andPractices,Ashgate:2003,http://books.google.com/books?id=2wZKtke1bcEC&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&dq=kachin+ceasefire+ga ve+SPDC+control+of+gems&source=bl&ots=4OthUZLd47&sig=e5wb4AF63TuI6DP4xbw_UIDdNUY&hl=en&ei=S7aOSYy7DZjEkAXw-rG3DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPP1,M1,last accessed19May2009.
225 MinistryofMines,“GovernmentPolicyandLegislationonInvestmentinMinerals”,http://www.mining.com.mm/imis/Mines/pltim.asp,lastaccessed13January2011.
226 MatthewSmith,“EnvironmentalGovernanceofMininginBurma”,inMyanmar:Thestate,communityandtheenvironment,TrevorWilsonandMoniqueSkidmore(eds),AustralianNationalUniversity,ANUEPressandAsiaPacificPress,2007.
227 EarthRights International, “Mining,Gender,and theEnvironment inBurma -Mining:Addressing theGenderGap”, 26Nov. 2004, http://www.earthrights.org/burmareports/mining_gender_and_the_environment_in_burma_2.html.
228 EarthRights International, “China in Burma: The Increasing Investment of ChineseMultinationalCorporations inBurma’sHydropower,OilandNaturalGas,andMiningSectors”,updatedSept.2008.,http://www.earthrights.org/files/Reports/China%20in%20Burma%20-%20BACKGROUNDER%20-%202008%20Update%20-%20FINAL.pdf,lastaccessed19May2009.
229 ForeignPolicy,“TheList:Burma’sEconomicLifelines”,Oct.2007,http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3986,lastaccessed19May2009.
230 ForeignPolicy,“TheList:Burma’sEconomicLifelines”,Oct.2007,http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3986,lastaccessed19May2009.
231 WorldRainforestMovement.“Burma;BehindtheGlitterofRubies,SapphiresandJade”,WorldRainforestMovementBulletin,No. 77,December2003, http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/77/Burma.html, lastaccessed19May2009.
232 EarthRights International, “Mining,Gender, and theEnvironment inBurma -Mining:Addressing theGenderGap”,26November2004,http://www.earthrights.org/burmareports/mining_gender_and_the_environment_in_burma_3.html,lastaccessed19May2009.
233 WorldRainforestMovement,“Burma;BehindtheGlitterofRubies,SapphiresandJade”,WorldRainforestMovementBulletin,No.77.Dec.2003,http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/77/Burma.html,lastaccessed19May2009.
234 ImagesAsiaandPanKachinDevelopmentSociety,“ExecutiveSummary”,AtWhatPrice?GoldMininginKachinState, November2004,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs/gold%20pdf1.pdf, last accessed8February2009.
235 KachinDevelopmentNetworkingGroup,ValleyofDarkness:GoldMiningandMilitarizationinBurma’sHugawngValley,2007,http://www.burmacampaign.org.uk/reports/ValleyofDarkness.pdf,lastaccessed19May2009.
236 CanadianFriendsofBurma,“Mining Investment”,http://www.cfob.org/mining.html, lastaccessed19May2009.
237 MatthewSmith,“EnvironmentalGovernanceofMininginBurma”,inMyanmar:Thestate,communityandtheenvironment,TrevorWilsonandMoniqueSkidmore(eds),AustralianNationalUniversity,ANUEPressandAsiaPacificPress,2007.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
94
238 MatthewSmith,‘EnvironmentalGovernanceofMininginBurma’,inMyanmar:Thestate,communityandtheenvironment,TrevorWilsonandMoniqueSkidmore(eds),AustralianNationalUniversity,ANUEPressandAsiaPacificPress,2007.
239 CourierInformationService,“LetpadaungCopperProjecttoReceiveBillionDollarInvestment”,16August2010.
240 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,“SaveOurMountain,SaveOurFuture:anupdatefromBurma’slargestironmine”,Thailand,October2010.
241 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,“SaveOurMountain,SaveOurFuture:anupdatefromBurma’slargestironmine”,Thailand,October2010.
242 Pa-OhYouthOrganization.RobbingtheFuture:Russian-backedMiningProjectThreatensPa-OCommunitiesinShanState,Burma,2009.
243 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,“SaveOurMountain,SaveOurFuture:anupdatefromBurma’slargestironmine”,Thailand,October2010.
244 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,“SaveOurMountain,SaveOurFuture:anupdatefromBurma’slargestironmine”,Thailand,October2010.
245 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,“SaveOurMountain,SaveOurFuture:anupdatefromBurma’slargestironmine”,Thailand,October2010.
246 CourierInformationService,“LetpadaungCopperProjecttoReceiveBillionDollarInvestment”,August162010.
247 Pa-OhYouthOrganizationandKyojuActionNetwork,PoisonClouds:LessonsfromBurma’slargestcoalprojectatTigyit,Thailand,2011.
248 LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization,Undercurrents:MonitoringDevelopmentonBurma’sMekong,Issue2,July2006.
249 LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization,PersonalInterview,February2011.
250 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,PersonalInterview,February2011.
251 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,RobbingtheFuture:Russian-BackedMiningProjectThreatensPa-OCommunitiesinShanStateBurma,2009.
252 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,PoisonClouds:LessonsfromBurma’sLargestCoalProjectatTigyit,2011.
253 LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization,PersonalInterview,February2011.
254 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,PersonalInterview,February2011.
255 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,RobbingtheFuture:Russian-BackedMiningProjectThreatensPa-OCommunitiesinShanStateBurma,2009.
256 Pa-OhYouthOrganization,PoisonClouds:LessonsfromBurma’sLargestCoalProjectatTigyit,2011.
257 LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization,Undercurrents:MonitoringDevelopmentonBurma’sMekong,Issue2,July2006.
258 LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization,PersonalInterview,February2011.
259 EarthRightsInternational“GoldMininginShwegyinTownship,PeguDivision”inAccessibleAlternatives:EthnicCommunities’Contribution toSocialDevelopmentandEnvironmentalConservation inBurma,BurmaEnvironmentWorkingGroup2010.
260 AlternativeASEANNetworkonBurma,“KeyIssues-Environment”,http://www.altsean.org/Key%20Issues/KeyIssuesEnvironment.htm,lastaccessed19May2009.
261 ResearchbyKarenEnvironmentCommittee,2010.
262 FAO,“GlobalForestResourcesAssessment”,Myanmarreport,2005.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
95
263 KhinHtun,“MyanmarForestryOutlookStudy”,Asia-PacificForestrySectorOutlookStudy II,WorkingPaperSeries,FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNationsRegionalOfficeforAsiaandthePacific,Bangkok,Thailand,2009.
264 Milieudefensie—FriendsoftheEarthNetherlands,SanctionedbutNotStopped:ResearchonTimberTradebetweentheEuropeanUnionandBurma,February2009,http://www.foeeurope.org/activities/forests/Milieudefensie%2008-20-1736%20Rapport%20Birma%20M%20lowres.pdf.
265 MartinSmith,“ParadiseLost?TheSuppressionofEnvironmentalRightsandFreedomofExpressioninBurma”,Article19,Sept.1994,http://www.article19.org/pdfs/publications/burma-environment.pdf,lastaccessed18May2009.
266 GlobalWitness,AChoiceforChina:EndingthedestructionofBurma’snorthernfrontierforestsLondon,2005
267 GlobalWitness,ADisharmoniousTrade:ChinaandtheContinuedDestructionofBurma’sNorthernFrontierForests,London,2009.
268 Mongabay.com, “Myanmar (Burma)”, last updated 4 February 2006, http://rainforests.mongabay.com/20myanmar.htm,lastaccessed18June2009.
269 GlobalWitness,ADisharmoniousTrade:ChinaandthecontinueddestructionofBurma’sFrontierforests,London,2009.
270 PanKachinDevelopmentSocietyandKarenEnvironmentalandSocialActionNetwork,withintroductionbySearchweb,DestructionandDegradationoftheBurmeseFrontierForests:ListeningtothePeople’sVoices,Kaboem,Amsterdam,2004,http://burmalibrary.org/docs/KESAN-PKDS_D&D.ocr.pdf.
271 Milieudefensie—FriendsoftheEarthNetherlands,SanctionedbutNotStopped:ResearchonTimberTradebetweentheEuropeanUnionandBurma,February2009,http://www.foeeurope.org/activities/forests/Milieudefensie%2008-20-1736%20Rapport%20Birma%20M%20lowres.pdf.
272 MartinSmith,“ParadiseLost?TheSuppressionofEnvironmentalRightsandFreedomofExpressioninBurma”,Article19,Sept.1994,http://www.article19.org/pdfs/publications/burma-environment.pdf,lastaccessed18May2009.
273 PanKachinDevelopmentSocietyandKarenEnvironmentalandSocialActionNetwork,withintroductionbySearchweb,DestructionandDegradationoftheBurmeseFrontierForests:ListeningtothePeople’sVoices,Kaboem,Amsterdam,2004,http://burmalibrary.org/docs/KESAN-PKDS_D&D.ocr.pdf.
274 PanKachinDevelopmentSocietyandKarenEnvironmentalandSocialActionNetwork,withintroductionbySearchweb,DestructionandDegradationoftheBurmeseFrontierForests:ListeningtothePeople’sVoices,Kaboem,Amsterdam,2004,http://burmalibrary.org/docs/KESAN-PKDS_D&D.ocr.pdf
275 PaulaBronstein, “The List:Burma’s Economic Lifelines”, ForeignPolicy, October2007,http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3986,lastaccessed19May2009.
276 GlobalWitness,“Chineseloggingthreatensoneoftheworld’shottestbiodiversityspots,inKachinState,Burma”,2December2004, http://www.globalwitness.org/media_library_detail.php/324/en/chinese_logging_threatens_one_of_the_worlds_hottes,lastaccessed15May2009.
277 KhunSam,“GettingtotheRootsofBurma’sLatestTimberTrade”,TheIrrawaddy,18June2007,http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=7506,lastaccessed15May2009.
278 PhuMurng,“NomoreteakforestinShanState”,7March2006,http://www.shanland.org/oldversion/index-2037.htm,lastaccessed15May2009.
279 TLKW,“SPDCGivesConcessions,KNUAllowsLogging”,KarenEnvironmentalandSocialActionNetwork,http://www.kesan.asia/news/logging_tenissarri.html,16July2009
280 MinorityRightsGroupInternational,“WorldDirectoryofMinoritiesandIndigenousPeoples-Myanmar/Burma:Karenni”,2008,http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,463af2212,469f2cde2,49749cddc,0.html,lastaccessed15May2009.
281 Anonymousresearch,Kachinstate,2010.
282 Anonymousresearch,Kachinstate,2010.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
96
283 ADB,GreaterMekongSubregionAtlasoftheEnvironment,AsianDevelopmentBank,2004
284 MuMuAung,ForestResearchInstitute,“StateofForestsandForestGeneticResourcesinMyanmar”,ProceedingsoftheSoutheastAsianMovingWorkshoponConservation,ManagementandUtilizationofForestGeneticResources,UNFoodandAgriculturalOrganization,Bangkok,June2002.http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/AC648E/ac648e08.htm#fn5,lastaccessed18May2009.
285 InformationprovidedbytheBurmeseGovernmenttothe8thsessionoftheUnitedNationsCommissiononSustainableDevelopment,“NaturalResourceAspectsofSustainableDevelopmentinMyanmar”,lastupdatedDecember1999,http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/myanmar/natur.htm, lastaccessed18May2009.
286 DeptofAgric.Planning(DAP),“MyanmarAgricultureinBrief”,UnionofMyanmarGovernment.MoAI,2010.
287 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs,Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,GMS,Bangkok, Dec2006.
288 MyanmarNationalCommissionforEnvironmentalAffairs,Myanmar:NationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,GMS,Bangkok, Dec2006.
289 MarwannMacan-Markar,IPS,“MangroveLossExacerbatedCycloneDestruction”,22May2008,http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42471,lastaccessed5February2009.
290 MarwannMacan-Markar,IPS.“MangroveLossExacerbatedCycloneDestruction”,22May2008,http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42471,lastaccessed5Feb.2009.
291 BurmaProject,OpenSocietyInstitute,“CountryinCrisis:Environment”,lastupdated23February2000,http://www3.soros.org/burma/CRISIS/green.html,lastaccessed18May2009.
292 KhaingWinShwe,“ShrimpFarming,MangroveForestsandLivelihoodofLocalPeopleinArakanState”,ArakanYouthNetworkGroup,March2006.
293 FAONewsroom,“IntactMangrovesCouldHavereducedCycloneDamage”,15May2008,Rome,http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2008/1000839/index.html.
294 MyoMyo,“MyanmarRehabilitationProject”,MyanmarTimes,Volume26,No.514.
295 K.Woods,Forthcoming.“ConflictTimberalongtheChina-BurmaBorder”,inChineseCirculations:Capital,CommoditiesandNetworksinSoutheastAsia,Wen-Chin&Tagliacozzo(Eds.).DukeUniversityPress
296 Hudson-Rodd,Nancy,MyoNyunt,SawThamainTun,andSeinHtay.2003.“Theimpactoftheconfiscationofland,labor,capitalassetsandforcedrelocationinBurmabythemilitaryregime.”NCUB/FTUBdiscussionpaper.
297 MinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation(MoAI),“AgriculturalSectorReviewandInvestmentStrategy”,Vol1,SectorReview,UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2004.
298 FoodSecurityWorkingGroup(FSWG),“FoodSecurityinMyanmar:Areviewofissues”,Unpublished,2004.
299 DeptofAgric.Planning(DAP),MoAI,“MyanmarAgricultureinBrief”,UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2008.
300 DeptofAgric.Planning(DAP),MoAI,“MyanmarAgricultureinBrief”,UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2008.
301 MyanmarAgriculturalConsensus,“RuralStatisticsfromAgriculturalCensus”,MinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation.SettlementandLandsRecordsDepartment(SLRD),UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2003.
302 MyanmarAgriculturalConsensus,“RuralStatisticsfromAgriculturalCensus”,MinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation.SettlementandLandsRecordsDepartment(SLRD),UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2003.
303 DeptofAgric.Planning(DAP),MoAI,“MyanmarAgricultureinBrief”,UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2008.
304 MyanmarAgricultureService(MAS),UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2010.
305 Z.Noam,“WhiteGoldRush.”IrrawaddyMagazine,June,Vol.18,No.6,2010.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
97
306 W.Boot,“BurmatoBoostRubberPlantationstomeetDomesticDemand”,IrrawaddyMagazine,29August2009.
307 TransnationalInstitute(TNI),“AlternativeDevelopmentofBusinessasUsual?China’sopiumsubstitutionpolicyinBurmaandLaos”,DrugPolicyBriefingNo.33,November2010.
308 TransnationalInstitute(TNI),“AlternativeDevelopmentofBusinessasUsual?China’sopiumsubstitutionpolicyinBurmaandLaos”,DrugPolicyBriefingNo.33,November2010.
309 MaungAye,“Burmatoleaseover100,000acresofArakaneseLandtoVietnam”,MizzimaNews,17August2010.
310 TransnationalInstitute(TNI),“AlternativeDevelopmentofBusinessasUsual?China’sopiumsubstitutionpolicyinBurmaandLaos”,DrugPolicyBriefingNo.33,November2010.
311 T.Kramer,“FromGoldenTriangletoRubberBelt?TheFutureofOpiumBansintheKokangandWaRegions”,TNIDrugPolicyBriefing,No.29,July2009.
312 TransnationalInstitute(TNI),“AlternativeDevelopmentofBusinessasUsual?China’sopiumsubstitutionpolicyinBurmaandLaos”,DrugPolicyBriefingNo.33,November2010.
313 T.Kramer,“FromGoldenTriangletoRubberBelt?TheFutureofOpiumBansintheKokangandWaRegions”,TNIDrugPolicyBriefing,No.29,July2009.
314 TransnationalInstitute(TNI),“AlternativeDevelopmentofBusinessasUsual?China’sopiumsubstitutionpolicyinBurmaandLaos”,DrugPolicyBriefingNo.33,November2010.
315 TransnationalInstitute(TNI),“AlternativeDevelopmentofBusinessasUsual?China’sopiumsubstitutionpolicyinBurmaandLaos”,DrugPolicyBriefingNo.33,November2010.
316 Z.Noam,“WhiteGoldRush.”IrrawaddyMagazine,June,Vol.18,No.6,2010.
317 Kwekalu,“CompanygrabsKarenLand”Kwekalunewsonline(Karenlanguage)http://www.kwekalu.net/vdo/nohpadoh.html,2010.
318 C.S.GohandK.TLee,“WillbiofuelprojectsinSouthEastAsiabecomeWhiteElephants?”EnergyPolicyJournal,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.009,ElsevierLtd,2010.
319 EthnicCommunityDevelopmentForum,BiofuelbyDecree:UnmaskingBurma’sbio-energyfiasco,ECDF,2008.
320 InterviewwithShanEnvironmentalActivist,February2011.
321 EthnicCommunityDevelopmentForum,BiofuelbyDecree:UnmaskingBurma’sbio-energyfiasco,ECDF,2008.
322 EthnicCommunityDevelopmentForum,BiofuelbyDecree:UnmaskingBurma’sbio-energyfiasco,ECDF,2008.
323 BurmaRiversNetwork,www.burmariversnetwork.org,lastaccessed20June2010.
324 DepartmentofAgriculturalPlanning(DAP),“MyanmarAgricultureinBrief”,MinistryofAgricultureandIrrigation.UnionofMyanmarGovernment,2010.
325 R.Sidle,A.Ziegler,andJ.Vogler,“ContemporarychangesinopenwatersurfaceareaofLakeInle,Myanmar,”SustainabilityScience,vol.2,2007.
326 AsianDevelopmentBank,“MyanmarNationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,”preparedbyNationalCommision forEnvironmentalAffairs,MinistryofForest,MyanmarandProjectSecretariatUNEPRegionalResourcesCenterforAsiaandthePacific,Bangkok2006.
327 EnvironmentThematicWorkingGroup,EnvironmentThematicWorkingGroupMeeting:Minutesof30July2010,MyanmarInformationManagementUnit,2010.Available:http://themimu.info/SectorCluster/Environment/Meeting%2520Minutes/ETWG_Meeting_Minutes_30_Jul_2010.pdf,lastaccessedOctober292010.
328 R.Sidle,A.Ziegler,andJ.Vogler,“ContemporarychangesinopenwatersurfaceareaofLakeInle,Myanmar,”SustainabilityScience,vol.2,2007.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
98
329 M. Su andA.D. Jassby, “Inle:A largeMyanmar lake in transition,”Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management,vol.5,2000.
330 AsianDevelopmentBank,“MyanmarNationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,”preparedbyNationalCommision forEnvironmentalAffairs,MinistryofForest,MyanmarandProjectSecretariatUNEPRegionalResourcesCenterforAsiaandthePacific,Bangkok2006.
331 D.M.OlsonandE.Dinerstein,“TheGlobal200:ARepresentationApproachtoConservingtheEarth’sMostBiologicallyValuableEcoregions,”Conservation Biology,vol.12,1998.
332 AsianDevelopmentBank,“MyanmarNationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,”preparedbyNationalCommision forEnvironmentalAffairs,MinistryofForest,MyanmarandProjectSecretariatUNEPRegionalResourcesCenterforAsiaandthePacific,Bangkok2006.
333 AsianDevelopmentBank,“MyanmarNationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,”preparedbyNationalCommision forEnvironmentalAffairs,MinistryofForest,MyanmarandProjectSecretariatUNEPRegionalResourcesCenterforAsiaandthePacific,Bangkok2006.
334 R.Sidle,A.Ziegler,andJ.Vogler,“ContemporarychangesinopenwatersurfaceareaofLakeInle,Myanmar,”SustainabilityScience,vol.2.
335 M. Su andA.D. Jassby, “Inle:A largeMyanmar lake in transition,”Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management,vol.5,2000.
336 MinHtinKoKoGyi,“TheFloatingTomatoes,”Myanmar:CreativeMediaHouse,2010.
337 FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations,Myanmar-MissionReportonInlandAquacultureandFisheries,2003,http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/ad497e/ad497e04.htm, lastaccessed29October2010.
338 MinHtinKoKoGyi,“TheFloatingTomatoes,”Myanmar:CreativeMediaHouse,2010.
339 NayPiTawNewscrew,“WatersurfaceareaofInlaylakeshrankfrom40squaremilesto27insummer”,ElevenMediaGroup,accessedon16September2010athttp://eversion.elevenmediagroup.net.
340 AsianDevelopmentBank,“MyanmarNationalEnvironmentalPerformanceAssessment(EPA)Report,”preparedbyNationalCommision forEnvironmentalAffairs,MinistryofForest,MyanmarandProjectSecretariatUNEPRegionalResourcesCenterforAsiaandthePacific,Bangkok2006.
341 MinHtinKoKoGyi,“TheFloatingTomatoes,”Myanmar:CreativeMediaHouse,2010.
342 EnvironmentThematicWorkingGroup,EnvironmentThematicWorkingGroupMeeting:Minutesof30July 2010,Myanmar InformationManagementUnit, 2010, http://themimu.info/SectorCluster/Environment/Meeting%2520Minutes/ETWG_Meeting_Minutes_30_Jul_2010.pdf,lastaccessedOctober292010.
343 FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations,Myanmar-MissionReportonInlandAquacultureandFisheries,2003,http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/ad497e/ad497e04.htm.lastaccessed:29October2010.
344 FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNationsRome,“Preparingforthenextgenerationofwatershedmanagementprogrammesandprojects:Asia,”Rome2005.
345 SalaiPiPi,“IllegalElephantTradeFlourishesinBurma:TRAFFIC”,Mizzima,12December2005,http://www.mizzima.com/news/inside-burma/1433-illegal-elephant-trade-flourishes-in-burma-traffic-.html.
346 AdamH.Oswell,TheBigCatTradeinMyanmarandThailand,TrafficSouthEastAsia,2010.
347 StefanLovgren,“WildlifeTradeBoominginBurmeseCasinoTown”,NationalGeographicNews,28February2008,http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/02/080228-wildlife-trade.html, lastaccessed8February2009.
348 Reuters,“ChinesedemandtakestollonwildlifeinBurma(Myanmar)”4Sep.2007.http://news.mongabay.com/2007/0904-burma.html,lastaccessed16June2009.
349 LahuNationalDevelopmentOrganization,Undercurrents:MonitoringDevelopmentonBurma’sMekong.Issue1.Jan.2006.
BURMA’S ENVIRONMENT: PEOPLE, PROBLEMS, POLICIES
99
350 ADB,TheEconomicsofClimateChangeinSouthEastAsia:ARegionalReview,ADB,April2009.
351 ADB,TheEconomicsofClimateChangeinSouthEastAsia:ARegionalReview,ADB,April2009.
352 BBCNews.“HimalayanGlaciers‘MeltingFast’”,lastupdated15Mar.2005,http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4346211.stm,lastaccessed8Feb.2009.
353 SvenHarmeling,Germanwatch:GlobalClimateRiskIndex2010,http://www.germanwatch.org/klima/cri2010.pdf
354 OCHA,“Myanmar:CyclonicStormGIRISituationReport#5”,02November2010.http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/MMR_OCHA-ESR-5.pdf
355 MyanmarTimesOnline,WeatherExperttoAttendClimateConference,20-16September2010,http://www.mmtimes.com/2010/news/541/news015.html
356 SvenHarmeling,Germanwatch:GlobalClimateRiskIndex,http://www.germanwatch.org/klima/cri2010.pdf,2010.
357 MyanmarTimesOnline,02–08August2010,“Latemonsooncouldhavetriggeredratswarm:expert”http://www.mmtimes.com/2010/news/534/news002.html
358 MyanmarTimesOnline,02–08August2010“Latemonsooncouldhavetriggeredratswarm:expert”,http://www.mmtimes.com/2010/news/534/news002.html
359 MyanmarTimesOnline,02–08August2010,“Latemonsooncouldhavetriggeredratswarm:expert”,http://www.mmtimes.com/2010/news/534/news002.html
360 MyanmarTimesOnline,9-15August2010.“MonsoonFailureExpectedinAugust”,http://www.mmtimes.com/2010/news/535/news017.html
361 DuncanGraham-Rowe,“Hydroelectricpower’sdirtysecretsrevealed”,NewScientist,24February2005,http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-powers-dirty-secret-revealed.html, lastaccessed20March2011.
362 H.Neue,“Methaneemissionfromricefields:Wetlandricefieldsmaymakeamajorcontributiontoglobalwarming”.BioScience,43(7),1993.
363 redd-monitor.org, “REDD:An Introduction”, http://www.redd-monitor.org/redd-an-introduction/, lastaccessed21March2011.
364 redd-monitor.org, “REDD:An Introduction”, http://www.redd-monitor.org/redd-an-introduction/, lastaccessed21March2011.
365 redd-monitor.org, “REDD:An Introduction”, http://www.redd-monitor.org/redd-an-introduction/, lastaccessed21March2011.
366 redd-monitor.org,“TheCancunAgreementonREDD:FourQuestionsandFourAnswers”,http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/12/18/the-cancun-agreement-on-redd-four-questions-and-four-answers/, lastaccessed21March2011.
367 redd-monitor.org, “REDD:An Introduction”, http://www.redd-monitor.org/redd-an-introduction/, lastaccessed21March2011.
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
100