PED_shorts_v2

20
Engineer Rotation Development Program March 6, 2015 PED GROUP ROTATION SHORTS PROJECT ENGINEERING Transmission Pipeline Engineering & Design Dani Kirchmeyer

Transcript of PED_shorts_v2

Page 1: PED_shorts_v2

Engineer Rotation Development Program

March 6, 2015

PED GROUP ROTATION

SHORTS PROJECT ENGINEERING

Transmission Pipeline Engineering & Design

Dani Kirchmeyer

Page 2: PED_shorts_v2

2

Outline

1. What I learned in six months at PG&E

2. Challenges

3. Areas to improve & proposed methods

4. What’s next? Going upstream & understanding integrity

management

5. Goals for my next rotation

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Page 3: PED_shorts_v2

Shorts assigned to be IFC’d by January 2015 = 20

Shorts IFC’d by January 2015 = 2

Shorts IFC’d to date = 3

Total # shorts contribution = 5

3

Challenges with emphasized goals

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Analogous to GT PED STIP = 0.0

“It doesn’t mean what it says.” – Mojica, W.

Page 4: PED_shorts_v2

4

L-105A valve replacement in Oakland

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Limited funds &

restricted compliance

date prevents

compiling project with

neighboring work

12 kV electric line

creates limited space

to install 30” TDW on L-

105A

Page 5: PED_shorts_v2

5

L-105A valve replacement in Oakland

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Limited funds &

restricted compliance

date prevents

compiling project with

neighboring work

12 kV electric line

creates limited space

to install 30” TDW on L-

105A

Page 6: PED_shorts_v2

Undefined station and

transmission pipe

boundary

Station Feature List

(SFL) unavailable to

verify scope

Historical design flaw:

Liquids risk at low point

within 100’ of station

features

6

Challenges: L-121 in Yuba City

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Low point

Page 7: PED_shorts_v2

Undefined station and

transmission pipe

boundary

Station Feature List

(SFL) unavailable to

verify scope

Historical design flaw:

Liquids risk at low point

within 100’ of station

features

Excavation damage

risk: Line 167 within 2’

of existing L-121 (VIF)

7

Challenges: L-121 in Yuba City

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Page 8: PED_shorts_v2

8

L-132 pipe replacement in SF

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Replace 2.7’ IM flagged D

pipe

ANSI 300 upgrade of pipe

assembly – should be

sufficient pressure bounds

contradictory dimensions on

As-builts

Overall recommendation to

reduce short pipe

replacements by expanding

future hydrotests

Page 9: PED_shorts_v2

STAGE 1

IM sifts through PFL and prioritizes

flagged segments

STAGE 2

Engineering validates data &

scope and determine plan

of action

STAGE 3

Project management assigns job #s,

order #s, & stakeholders

STAGE 4

Engineering & Estimating 60/90/IFC

drawing review process

STAGE 6

PM, Construction & Engineering

complete construction

phase

9

Moving Upstream

Page 10: PED_shorts_v2

STAGE 1

IM sifts through PFL and prioritizes

flagged segments

STAGE 2

Engineering validates data &

scope and determine plan

of action

STAGE 3

Project management assigns job #s,

order #s, & stakeholders

STAGE 4

Engineering & Estimating 60/90/IFC

drawing review process

STAGE 6

PM, Construction & Engineering

complete construction

phase

10

Moving Upstream

Page 11: PED_shorts_v2

11

Goals for Integrity Management

PED project forecast

Address IM

flagged pipe

Public & Employee

Safety, Engaged

Employees

Improve scopes for

pipeline projects

Understand how pipe

segments are flagged

given available records

Learn to discern what

projects to prioritize

based on IM industry

studies

Explore the

methodologies to

mitigate risk and refine

where necessary

Page 12: PED_shorts_v2

Nick Jordan for his support with the L-105A Oakland project,

valuable feedback & insight, and field exposure

Shiela Moore for document research recommendations

George Farage for thorough review of PDS documents upon

projects assignments, helpful suggestions on project workflow

efficiency and overall investment in my professional growth

Ed Stracke for grilling me with questions

Neil Flemmer for supporting shorts projects, feedback on design’s impact on construction

Francisco Castro for the opportunity to learn & contribute to the

PED group

12

Acknowledgements and Thank you’s!

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Page 13: PED_shorts_v2

13

Questions?

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Page 14: PED_shorts_v2

14

Field visits

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Napa Tie-in with

Josh Hampton

Page 15: PED_shorts_v2

15

Field visits

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Napa Tie-in with

Josh Hampton

Page 16: PED_shorts_v2

16

Field visits

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Napa Tie-in with

Josh Hampton

Page 17: PED_shorts_v2

17

Field visits

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Napa Tie-in with

Josh Hampton

30” ball valve

stored at

McDonald Island in

Los Medanos

Page 18: PED_shorts_v2

18

Field visits

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Napa Tie-in with

Josh Hampton

30” ball valve

stored at

McDonald Island in

Los Medanos

L-401 1000’ HDD for

pipe relocation due

to class change

Page 19: PED_shorts_v2

19

Field visits

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015

Napa Tie-in with

Josh Hampton

30” ball valve

stored at

McDonald Island in

Los Medanos

L-401 1000’ HDD for

pipe relocation due

to class change

Page 20: PED_shorts_v2

20

Nuggets of Wisdom

“Don’t take my answer as gospel.” – Jordan, N.

“The most important thing about the workplace is quality and

performance.” – G. Farage

“At PG&E, you’re your brother’s keeper.” – N. Jordan

“A man without vision perishes.” – Mojica, W.

Pipeline Engineering & Design Group – March 6, 2015