2010 USER FORUM The Rutherford Vision Michael Rutherford Paul Rutherford.
Paul Ehlrich vision - akhaag.userpage.fu-berlin.de
Transcript of Paul Ehlrich vision - akhaag.userpage.fu-berlin.de
© M. Wyszogrodzka
„The Magic Bullet“
„The magic bullet“
Paul Ehlrich vision(begining of 20th century)
Nobel in Medicine - 1908
mAbs as a carriers of drugs
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Ringsdorf Model
Ringsdorf Model (1975)
Chemistry of bioconjugationEg. PK2, CT-2130 etc.
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Drug Classes & Modes of Action
Targeting the tumor cell cytostatic drug
Targeting the blood supply of the tumor anti-angiogenetic drug
Inhibition of cell growth and proliferation
Inhibition of angiogenesis (the growth of new blood vessels)
Principles of chemotherapeutic treatment
Paclitaxel
Doxorubicine
N
O
O
NHO
O
(S)-Thalidomide
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Low Molecular Weight Drugs
• most drugs are small molecules (MW ~ 500 g/mol)
• short half life in blood circulation
• fast diffusion into healthy regions
• fast clearance from body
• low selectivity for target tissue causing side effects
• low amounts of drug reach target tissue
• no constant levels of drug concentration
• many side effects
• multiresistance
• poor selectivity
• poor water solubility
• high toxicity
Pharmacokinetic profile of Interferon and Pegasys -Interferon conjugated to branched PEG 40 kDa
Circulation life-time difference between unmodified drug and polymer-drug conjugate
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Low Molecular Therapeutics vs. Macromolecular Therapeutics
Polymers in Drug Delivery, Taylor, 2006, Uchegbu, p 159.
Slubility problems Cell entry by diffision
No preferential accumulation Targeting (prodrug) possible
Fast elimination Non-specific toxicity
Improved water slubility Cell entry by endocytosis
(abbility to overcome multidrug resistance) Preferentia accumulation in solid tumors Effective targeting
- cell surface receptors- specific subcellular organelles Slower elimination Decreased non-specific toxicity
Low Molecular Therapeutics Macromolecular Therapeutics
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Requirements for Polymeric Drug Carriers
Polymers in Drug Delivery, Taylor, 2006, Uchegbu, p 161.
1. Well characterized (reproducibility, PDI, heavy metal traces)
2. Hydrophilic for intravenous drug delivery.
3. Biocompatible (non-toxic and non-immunogenic), also metabolic products
4. Multivalent (for conjugation of drug, targeting and/or imaging moiety)
5. Stable in circulation (drug linkage)
6. Formulation (stabile under convenient administration)
7. Easly eliminated from the body (whole polymer or metabolites)
Polymeric drug carriers have to be:
Cancer Therapy
Higher Selectivity to Cancer Cells
Passive Targeting Active Targeting
Antigene
Growth Factors
Peptide receptors
Carbohydrate receptors
Vaccins receptors
speciffic phisiological differences:
True for tumors bigger than 2-3 mm
Based on Tumor Vasculature
Solution: Tumor specific delivery
Based on Tumor Cell-Surface Receptor
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Passive Targeting
Enahnced Permeability and Retention Effect (Maeda, 1986, SMANCS)
Tumor size: 2-3 mm cell clusters inducing angiogenesisPore size: 100 – 1200 nm (depending on tumor type)
Uncharged or negatively chargedmacromolecular carriers that larger than 40 kDa efficiently escape renal clearance.
Intravenous administration of macromoleculartherapeutics
Size-dependent selectivity of drugs entry
Structural features of macormolecules: molecular weight (> 40kDa) charge (negative or neutral) shape (globular, linear, branched) hydrodynamic radius
Selectivity Passive targeting
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Demonstration of the EPR-Effect
tumor tumor tumor
Indotricarbocyanin (unbound dye)
after 24 h
PEG 40kDa-Indocarbo-cyanin-conjugate
after 24 h
Problem: Tumor specificity only with nanoparticles >5 nm
K. Licha, F. Kratz
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Active Targeting
Endocytotic pathway for the cellular uptake of macromolecules and nanocarriers for drug delivery
Selectivity Active targeting
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Synthesis of Dendrimers
Convergent Growth Approach
Divergent Growth Approach
from shell to the core
from core to the shell
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Synthesis of Polyglycerol Dendrons
O
OO
RO OR
RO
RO
O
OO
ORRO
OR
OR
X
Divergentapproach
Convergentapproach
dihydroxylation
O
OO
R1O OR1
R1O
R1O
O
OO
OR1R1O
OR1
OR1
O
OO
O
OO
X
1. oxidation2. reduction
[G2.0]-X-OR
R = R1 or R = R1
Cl
ClClWiliamson's
ether formationWiliamson's
ether formation
O O OHX OHOH
HO O O OR1
OH OR1OR1R1O
O O OHOH OHOH
HO
TRIGLYCEROL
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Properties of Dendrimers
highly branched highly reactive three-dimentional high structural purity (low PDI) monodispercity (single MW) globular shape large number of „peripheral“ functionalities bifunctionality multivalency
A. W. Bosman, H. M. Janssen, E. W. Meijer Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1665-1688.
Advantages:
step-by-step synthesis (tedious) high costs of production „mistakes“ in the structure
Disadvantages:
© M. Wyszogrodzka
First Dendrimers
NN
NH
NH
HN
HN
O
O O
O
N
N
N
N
NHNHN
N
NH N
NH
N
HN NNH
N
NHN
HN
N
O
O
O
O
NH HNO O
N N
NHO
HNO
NN
HN
HN O
O
N
N HN
O
NHO
N
N
O
ONH
NH
HNNHO O
O
O
NN
N
N
O
ONH
O
HNO
OHNNH
O
NN
N
N
HNNH
HN
NH
HN
HN
HN
HN
HN
HN
NH
HN NH HN NHHN
NH
HN
NH
HN
NH
NH
NH
NH
HN
NH
HN
NHHNNHHNNH
OO OO
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OO
OOOOOO
OO
O
O
O
O
O
NH2H2NNH2H2NNH2
NH2
H2N
H2N
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
H2NNH2
H2NNH2H2NNH2H2N
NH2
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
[G4.0] PAMAM - Poly(amido amine)
1985 – Don Tomalia
Starburst® (Dendritech)
NN
N
N
N
NN
NN
N
N
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NN N
N
N
N
N
N
NN
N
NN N N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N N
N
H2N
H2NH2N
H2NH2N H2N NH2 H2N NH2 H2N NH2 NH2 NH2
NH2NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2
NH2NH2
NH2NH2
NH2NH2NH2NH2NH2NH2H2NNH2H2NNH2H2N
H2NH2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
H2N
[G5.0] PPI* - Poly(propylene imine)
Astramol® (DSM Fine Chemicals)
* known also as POPAM, or DAB with DiAminoButan
1978 – F. Vögtle1993 – E. W. ´ Bert´ Meijerand indepedently G. Mülthaupt
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Drug-Loaded Dendrimers
N
HNO
RNH
OO
NH
OR
NHO
O
N
N
HN O
R NH
O O
NHO
RNH
OO
N
N
HN O
R NH
O O
NH O
R NH
O O
N
N
HNO
RNH
OO
NH O
R NH
O O
N
N
HNO
RNH
OO
NHO
RNH
OO
NN
HN
O
R
NH
O
ONHO
RNH
OO
N
N HN
O
R
NH
O
O
NH
O
R
NH
O
O
N
NHN
O
R
NH
O
O
NH
O
R
NH
O
O
NHN
O
R
NH
O
O
NH
O
R
NH
O
O
N
N
HN
O
R
NH
O
O
NH
O
R
NH
O
O
N
N
NH
O
R
HNO
O
NH
O
R
HN
O
O
N
N
NH
O
R
HN O
O
NH
O
R
HNO
O
N
N
NH
OR
HN O
O
NH
O
R
HNO
O
N
N
NH
O R
HN O
O
NH
OR
HN O
O
N
N
NH
OR
HNO
O
HN
O R
HNO
O
N
N
NHO
RHN
OO
HN
OR
HNO
O
N
N
NHO
RHN
OO
HN
OR
HNO
O
N
N
NHO
RHN
OO
HNO
RHN
OO
N
N
NHO
RHN
OO
HNO
RHN
OO
N
N
NHO
RHN
OO
HNO
RHN
OO
N
N
NHO
RHN
OO
HN
O
RHN
OO
NN
NH
O
R
HN
O
O HN
O
RHN
OO
N
NNH
O
R
HN
O
O
HN
O
R
HN
O
O
N
N
NH
O
R
HN
O
O
NH
O
R
HN
O
O
N
NH
O
R
HN
O
O
NH
O
R
HN
O
O
N
N
NH
O
R
HN
O
O
NH
O
R
HN
O
O
N
N
HN
O
R
NHO
O
NH
O
R
NH
O
O
N
N
HN
O
R
NHO
O
NH
O
R
NHO
O
N
N
HN
OR
NHO
O
NH
O
R
NHO
O
N
N
HN
OR
NHO
O
NH
OR
NHO
O
N
N
HN
OR
NHO
O
NH
OR
NHO
O
N
N
HNO
RNH
OO
NH
OR
NHO
O
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NN
NH2
NH2
N
N NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2H2N
N
N
NH2 H2N
N
N
NH2H2N
N
N
NH2 H2N
N
N
H2NH2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
NN
H2N
H2N
N
NH2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
O
O
O
O HN O
O
95% HCOOH
N
HNO
RNH2
NH
OR
NH2
N
N
HN O
R NH2
NHO
RNH2
N
N
HN O
R NH2
NH O
R NH2
N
N
HNO
RNH2NH O
R NH2
N
N
HNO
RNH2NH
O
RNH2
NN
HN
O
R
NH2
NHO
RNH2
N
N HN
O
R
NH2
NH
O
R
NH2
N
NHN
O
R
NH2
NH
O
R
NH2
NHN
O
R
NH2
NH
O
R
NH2
N
N
HN
O
R
NH2
NH
O
R
NH2
N
N
NH
O
R
NH2
NH
O
R
NH2
N
N
NH
OR
NH2
NH
O
R
NH2
N
N
NH
OR
NH2
NH
O
R
NH2
N
N
NH
O R
H2N
NH
OR
NH2
N
N
NH
OR
H2N
HN
O R
H2N
N
N
NHO
RH2N
HN
OR
H2N
N
N
NHO
RH2N
HN
OR
H2N
N
N
NHO
RH2N
HNO
RH2N
N
N
NHO
RH2N
HNO
RH2N
N
N
NHO
RH2N
HNO
RH2N
N
N
NHO
RH2N
HN
O
RH2N
NN
NH
O
R
H2N HN
O
RH2N
N
NNH
O
R
H2N
HN
O
R
H2N
N
N
NH
O
R
H2N
NH
O
R
H2N
N
NH
O
R
H2N
NH
O
R
H2N
N
N
NH
O
R
H2N
NH
O
R
H2N
N
N
HN
O
R
H2N
NH
O
R
H2N
N
N
HN
O
R
H2N
NH
O
R
H2N
N
N
HN
OR
H2N
NH
O
R
H2N
N
N
HN
OR
NH2
NH
OR
H2N
N
N
HN
OR
NH2
NH
OR
NH2
N
N
HNO
RNH2
NHO
R
NH2
N
12 N HCl
N
H2NNH2
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NN
NH2
NH2
N
N NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2
NH2
N
N
NH2H2N
N
N
NH2 H2N
N
N
NH2H2N
N
N
NH2 H2N
N
N
H2NH2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
NN
H2N
H2N
N
NH2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2N
H2N
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
H2NNH2
N
N
H2NNH2
N
Shape-Selective Release of Guest
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Drug-Loaded Dendrimers
[G5.0]
[G4.0]
[G3.0]
PEG400
PTX
10.000 fold better solubilization than in H2O
Solubilization of Paclitaxel by PG Dendrimers
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Dendrimers for MRI
GdCore
*
Gd
*Gd
*Gd
* GdLys Lys
Lys
*
Gd*
Gd
*
Gd
*
Gd
Lys
LysLys
**
Gd*
Gd *Gd
LysLys
Lys
*
Gd
*
Gd
*Gd
*GdLys
Lys
Lys
*
Gd
* Gd*
Gd
* Gd
Lys
Lys
Lys
*
Gd
*
Gd
*
Gd
*
Gd
Lys
Lys Lys
Gd
Gadomer®-17 (Schering AG)
DTPA
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Dendrimers for MRI
Gadomer®-17 (Gadomer-24)
• Polylysine dendrimer carrying 24 Gadolium complexes on the surface• MW = 17 kDa• blood pool contrast agent• high in vivo stability
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Folate-Targeted Cancer Therapeutic
EC145 (Leamon, 2006)
Vinca alkaloid desacetylvinblastine monohydrazide
(DAVLBH, a depolymerization inhibitor)
Water soluble spacer - arginine and aspartic acid
Release by disulfide reduction
MTD ~ 0.8 mg/kg DAVLBH-eq.
Phase II clinical trial (EC145)
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymer-Protein Conjugate
SMANCS -Poly(Styrene-co-Maleic Acid-half-n-butylate)-conjugated NeoCarzinoStatin
NCS - proteinaceous antitumor antibiotic (Streptomyces carzinostaticus)
Apoprotein (113 aminoacids) + tightly, non-covalently bound labile Chromophore
Chromophor
Cytotoxicity (0.01 g/ml) against:- mammalian cells- gram (+) bacteriaShort half-timet0.5 = 1.9 min
SMA – copolymer of styrene-maleic acid-half-n-butylate
SMANCS-Lipiodol - approved in 1993 (Japan) for treatment of liver cancer
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Biopolymer-Drug Conjugates
Doxo-EMCH
Acid-labile Hydrazone
Reactive maleimid
Blood protein albumin (HSA)as polymeric drug carrier
F. Kratz F, J. Contr. Release, 2000, 132, 171-183.
Direct injection of Doxo-maleimid (Pro-Drug) Ultimate coupling to Cys-34 of HSA (70% free thiol) In situ generation of polymeric pro-drug Longer circulation, cellular uptake, higher therapeutic window
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Immunoconjugates
Senter et. al. Nature Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1137-1146,www.seattlegenetics.com
Structure: chimeric mAbs BR96 – targeting anti-LewisY
~ 8 DOX molecules per mAb
BR96-DOX
Phase I clinical study66 patients, intravenous administration over 21dDose: 66 – 875 mg/m2 (2-25 mg/m2 free DOX)
Phase II clinical study29 patients Dose: 700 mg/m2 (20 mg/m2 free DOX)
cross-reactivity of BR96-DOX with normal gastrointestinal tissue BR96-DOX demonstrated synergistic effects with paclitaxel and docetaxel(Taxotere®)
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymer-Drug Conjugate
HPMA - N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamideDeveloped in Czechoslovakia as a plasma expander - Kopecek and Bazilova, 1973
• hydrophilic• non toxic in rats• non-biodegradable
x/y = 90/10
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymer-Drug Conjugates
Diblock Co-Polymer-Doxorubicin enzyme-cleavable peptide structure
N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) Copolymer-Doxorubicin
Doxorrubicin content: ~ 8,5 wt % Tetrapeptide Linker EPR targeting Cleavage by lysosomal Cathepsin B
> selective release of Doxo MW: 28 kDa > Excretion via kidney
(barrier: 30-50 KDa) maximal tolerated dose: 320 mg/m2 (10 mg/kg) Currently Phase II clinical trial Problem: not optimal tumor accumulation of PK1
PK 1 (FCE28068) - 1994
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymer-Drug Conjugates
Diblock Co-Polymer-Doxorubicin enzyme-cleavable peptide structure
PK 2 (FCE28069) - 2002
HPMAcopolymer-Doxorubicin / Galactosamine
Doxorubicin content: ~ 8,5 wt % Tetrapeptide linker EPR Targeting
+ targeting via galactosamine (asialglycoprotein receptor) Cleavage by lysosomal cathepsin B MW: 25 kDa maximal tolerated Dose: 320 mg/m2 (10 mg/kg) Currently Phase II clinical trial
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymer-Drug Conjugates
Diblock Co-Polymer-Taxol pH-cleavable release of drug
PG-TXL (CT2103) - 1992Polyglutamate-Paclitaxel
Mixture of connection via two different
OH-groups in Paclitaxel (ester bonds)
Drug content ~ 37%
Improved water solubility >20mg/kg
Release by ester hydrolysis
PG backbone is biodegradable
(in vitro and in vivo -clevage by Cathepsin B)
MTD ~ 200 mg/m2 Taxol-eq.
Phase III clinical trial (CT2103, Cell Ther.)
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymer-Drug Conjugates
H3CO
O NH
O HN
H
NH
O
NOH
OH
OHO
O
OH3C
OH
O
O
OHNH2
H3C
n
m
Schematic picture of block copolymer and chemical structure of PEG-b-p(Asp-HYD-DOXO)
PEG-b-p(Asp-HYD-DOXO)
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymeric Micelle in Cancer Therapy
NK911 • Doxorubicin-loaded PEG-b-PAsp copolymer micelle formulation (Kataoka)• drug physically entrapped in the micelle core and chemically conjugated to the aspartic acid side chains of the core-forming block via amide linkages• phase II clinical trial evaluation for efficacy and toxicity profiles
Phase I (2001):• longer circulation half-life (50nm)• a larger area under the curve (AUC)• reduced toxicities in comparison to the conventional formulation of Dox
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymeric Vesicles in Cancer Therapy
DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) is doxorubicin hydrochloride (HCl) encapsulated in STEALTH® liposomes for intravenous administration
Compositions of the STEALTH® liposome carriers
MPEG-DSPEHSPC
© M. Wyszogrodzka
Polymeric Vesicles in Cancer Therapy
DOXIL, Caelyx (Doxorubicin-Liposomal)• Encapsulation of Dox through active loading that is based on an
ammonium sulfate gradient• 15000 Doxorubicin molecules per Vesikel (100 nm)• Slow tissue clearance after injection PEGylation• Long circulation in bloodstream• slow, targeted release of the drug• 6-fold higher effectivity in comparison to the free Dox