Pasta, Low Glycemic Index Diets and Health Dr. Cyril W.C. Kendall Department of Nutritional...
-
Upload
cuthbert-daniels -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Pasta, Low Glycemic Index Diets and Health Dr. Cyril W.C. Kendall Department of Nutritional...
Pasta, Low Glycemic Index Diets and Health
Dr. Cyril W.C. Kendall
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto;
The Clinical Nutrition & Risk Factor Modification Center, St. Michael’s Hospital;
Toronto, OntarioCANADA
Weight Loss & Dieting
• 45% of women and 30% of men are
trying to lose weight (US data).
Christine Wood, M.D. How to Get Kids to Eat Great & Love It
Desire for Healthy Eating
• What parents want for their children:– 99% of parents agreed that “it is important for
my child to eat nutritious foods”;– 91% believed that it’s important to “restrict the
amount of sugars consumed”; and– 84% believed “dietary fat reduction was
important”
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1985
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1986
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1987
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1988
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1989
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1990
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1991
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1992
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1993
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1994
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1995
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1996
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1997
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1998
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1999
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2000
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2001
Source: Mokdad A H, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16, 2001;286:10.
Childhood Overweight and Obesity: International Statistics
(Ebbeling et al, Lancet, 2002)
Health Consequences of Obesity
(Ebbeling et al. Lancet, 2002)
Diet (Macronutrient Intake) Trends
Nutrient Composition of Various Diets
Nutrient Composition of 1600 kcal Diets
Atkins Protein Sugar The ADA High Pritikin OrnishPower Busters Zone Fiber
CHO (%) 5 8 40 40 60 63 73 74
Protein (%) 35 35 28 28 20 16 18 18
Fat (%) 59 53 32 32 20 21 9 7
SFA (%) 22 15 8 7 6 4 2 1
Cholesterol (mg/d) 924 657 280 264 112 58 57 30
Fiber (g/d) 4 11 24 18 22 29 41 49
Sugar (g/d) 8 13 68 67 90 80 113 101
Weight Loss – 6 Months
-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-10
Brehm Foster Samaha
% C
ha
ng
e
Low-Carbohydrate
Low-Fat
* *
*
The Perfect Storm Against Carbohydrates
● Increasing obesity rates.
● Increases in % carbohydrate dietary intakes.
● Some scientific evidence indicating low carbohydrate diets are more effective for promoting weight loss.
Changing the Tide for Carbohydrates
● Oldways Pasta Meeting (Rome, Feb 2004).Bringing experts together to discuss the issue and promote the healthy carbohydrate message.
● Individuals on Atkins diet suffering CHD events and suing.
● New scientific evidence.
Daily Caloric Food Consumption
Area
Year 1965 1975 1985 1998
Estim
2015
Estim
2030
World 2358
100%
2435 2655 2803
119%
2940 3050
129%
Dev 2054
100%
2152 2450 2681
131%
2850 2980
145%
Indust 2947
100%
3065 3206 3380
115%
3440 3500
119%
Modified from Table 1 p. 15 Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Disease, WHO Technical Report 916, 1-160, 2003 , increases in sugar and fat intake
Low compliance on both diets.
Foster GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2082-90.
Weight loss on Low-carbohydrate diet
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 3 6 9 12
Month
Ch
ang
e in
Wei
gh
t (%
)
Conventional diet
Low-carbohydrate diet
Base-line Values Carried Forward
Percent change in LDL-C
Foster GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2082-90.
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 3 6 9 12
Month
Ch
ang
e in
LD
L C
ho
lest
ero
l (%
)Low-carbohydrate diet Conventional diet
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
% Reduction
A O WW Z
Diets
Weight Loss (at 12 months)
Tufts Popular Diet Study
Dansiger, Gleason, Wen, Griffin, Selker, Schaefer JAMA 2005;293:43-53
Tufts Popular Diet Study
Compliance at 12 months:
21/40 still on Atkins (A),
20/40 on Ornish (O),
26/40 on Weight Watchers (WW),
26/40 on Zone (Z).
Dansiger, Gleason, Wen, Griffin, Selker, Schaefer JAMA 2005;293:43-53
The End of the Revolution?
Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes Trends Among Adults in the U.S., BRFSS
1990, 1995 and 20011990 1995
2001
Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and other obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003 Jan 1;289(1).
No Data <4% 4%-6% 6%-8% 8%-10% >10%
Diabetes Prevention Program Study
• Metformin vs. Lifestyle (exercise & diet)
31 % 58 % Diabetes Complications
2.1 Kg 5.6 Kg Weight Loss
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. N Engl J Med 2002;346:393.
STOP-NIDDM Trial
N= 1,386 subjects with Impaired Glucose Tolerance
(high risk of developing diabetes)
~50% of subjects received acarbose (α-glucosidase inhibitor, ↓ rate of glucose absorption).
RESULT: ↓ 36% progression to diabetes
Chiasson J-L, Josse RG, Hanefeld M, et al. JAMA 2003;346:393.
STOP-NIDDM Trial
Chiasson J-L, Josse RG, Hanefeld M, et al. JAMA 2003;346:393.
CVD Events
Acarbose
↓ 49% RR
STOP-NIDDM Trial
Chiasson J-L, Josse RG, Hanefeld M, et al. JAMA 2003;346:393.
Hypertension
(new cases)
Acarbose
↓ 34% RR
Glycemic Index
Low vs. High GI Foods:
Blood Glucose Increments after Spaghetti, White and Wholemeal Bread (n=9)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Time (h)
Blo
od G
luco
se (m
mol
/L)
Spaghetti
White Bread
Wholemeal Bread
0 1 2 3
<0.05
<0.005 <0.001<0.005
<0.02
Jenkins et al. Diab Care 1983;6:155-9
GLYCEMIC INDEX RANKINGFoods grouped into high, intermediate and low classes according to GI :
High GI (GI >90) Most Breads Plain Crackers Most Breakfast Cereals
Instant Mashed Potatoes Millet Corn chips
Medium GI (GI 70-89) All Bran Oatmeal Most biscuits or cookies Rice
Buckwheat Sweet Corn Boiled New Potatoes Yam Sweet Potatoes
Low GI (GI <69) Pasta Pumpernickel Bread Parboiled Rice Most legumes (dried)
Nuts Barley Bulgur (cracked wheat)
High GI
Intermediate GI
Low GI
Mixed meals are predictablein subjects with type 2 diabetes
0
20
40
60
80
100Single food Mixed meal
GI
Bornet et al. Am J Clin Nutr 1987, 42:1192
Postprandial Metabolism and Oxidative Stress
Ciriello, 2003
Metabolism of Carbohydrates
“With regard to the glycemic effects of carbohydrates, the total amount of carbohydrate in meals or snacks is more important than the source or type”
American Diabetes Association, (Diabetes Care Jan 2004;27:37s).
Metabolism of Carbohydrates
●“Regulation of blood glucose to achieve near normal levels is a primary goal in the management of diabetes, and, thus, the dietary techniques that limit hyperglycemia following a meal are likely important in limiting the complications of diabetes.”
●“A recent analysis of the randomized controlled trials that have examined the efficacy of the glycemic index on overall blood glucose control indicates that the use of this technique can provide an additional benefit over that observed when total carbohydrate is considered alone.”
American Diabetes Association, (Diabetes Care Sept 2004;27:2267).
Low vs High GI Diet: a Meta-Analysis% Difference in Glycated Proteins
Gilbertson et al. 2001Komindr et al. 2001Giacco et al 2000Luscombe et al 1999Jarvi et al 1999Lafrance et al 1998Frost et al 1993Wolever et al 1992Wolever et al 1992Fontvieille et al 1992Brand et al 1991Jenkins et al 1991Fontvieille et al 1988Collier et al 1988
% -35 -25 -15 -5 5 15
Mean %difference in 14 studies = -7.4% (CI -8.8 to -6.0%)Mean %difference in 14 studies = -7.4% (CI -8.8 to -6.0%)
OVERALL RESULTOVERALL RESULT
Brand-Miller et al, Diabetes Care 2003;26:2261-67
Glycemic load and risk of diabetesNurses Health Study 6 years of follow-up in 65,000 women
Salmeron et al. JAMA 1997;277:472-7
11.28
1.51
2.5
0
1
2
3
Low Medium High High GI +low fibre
Glycemic load
Relative risk of Type 2
Diabetes
P < 0.03adjusted
forknown risk
factors
Glycemic load and risk of heart attackNurses Health Study 10 years of follow-up in 65,000 women
1 0.981.21
1.49
1.9
0
1
2
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5Lowest Glycemic load Highest
Relative risk of CHD
P < 0.0001 adjusted for known risk factors
Liu et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2000,71: 1455
Frost et al. Lancet 1999;353:1045-8
Glycemic index and HDL-cholesterol
Liu et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:492-8
Glycemic Load and C-Reactive Protein
Glycemic load and risk of colon cancerCase-control study (1950 cases and 4154 controls) from Italy
11.2 1.2
1.6
1.9
0
1
2
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5Lowest Glycaemic load Highest
Relative risk of colon
cancer
p < 0.001 for trend, adjusted for age, sex, education, exercise, fibre, alcohol and
energy
Franceschi et al. Ann Oncol 2001, 12: 173
Future Research Directions
• Short-term (mechanistic) studies of pasta and other low glycemic index foods on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers.
• Longer-term effectiveness (real world) studies to assess low glycemic index diets in diabetes and heart disease prevention and control.
Summary
• The low carbohydrate diet craze appears to be coming to an end, although some low-carb sentiment remains.
• Low glycemic index diets by virtue of slowing absorption appear to be protective for a number of chronic diseases and may be effective in body weight control.
Postprandial GlycemiaLow vs High GI mixed meals
Laine et al. Diabetes Care 1987, 10:387
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
High GI mixed meal Low GI mixed meal
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Healthy subjects (n = 13) Type 2 subjects (n = 16)
Brand et al. Diabetes Care 1991, 14:95
Time (min)
***
Postprandial InsulinemiaLow vs High GI mixed meals
Laine et al. Diabetes Care 1987
Ser
um
In
suli
nU
/mL
Time (min)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
High GI meal Low GI meal
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Coulston et al. Diabetes Care 1987
Healthy subjects Type 2 subjects
3 Meals a Day vs. Nibbling Diet
Tufts Popular Diet Study: Atkins (low carb), Ornish (low fat), Weight Watchers (calories),
& Zone (glycemic load)
Dansiger, Gleason, Wen, Griffin, Selker, Schaefer JAMA 2005;293:43-53
Objective:
To assess adherence rates and the effectiveness of 4 popular diets for weight loss and cardiac risk factor reduction
Summary
Industry – must take the high road.
1. Proactive.
2. Responsible. 3. Choice.
Summary
Industry – must take the high road.
1. Proactive: Take the lead in promoting healthy diets and activities and in dealing with childhood obesity. : Work with government and health agencies to address this issue.
2. Responsible: Advertising and labeling.
3. Choice: Healthy foods and portion sizes.