Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

24
Bak tallene: Hva kan vi lære av omdømmevinnerne? Peggy Simcic Brønn, BI Leder, Senter for VirksomhetsKommunikasjon

description

For sjuende gang har Reputation Institute og Apeland Informasjon, i samarbeid med Peggy S. Brønn ved Handelshøyskolen BI, analysert omdømmet til de 50 mest synlige norske virksomhetene. Over 10 000 nordmenn gir sine vurderinger i første kvartal 2010. Hvilke bedrifter har best omdømme i Norge i 2010? Hvem har tapt omdømmepoeng? Hvem har gjort det største rykket det siste året?

Transcript of Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Page 1: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Bak tallene: Hva kan vi lære av omdømmevinnerne?

Peggy Simcic Brønn, BILeder, Senter for

VirksomhetsKommunikasjon

Page 2: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Two Reputational Issues

• Communication• Governance

Page 3: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Omdømme

Distinctive

Sincere

Responsive

Consistent

Visible

Transparent

Most Important Communication Drivers of Reputation

Page 4: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

•’The organization’s beating heart’

•Genuine, honest, truthful

Sincerity (Ekthet)

•The core of dialogue

Responsive

•Open

Transparent

Page 5: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

RepTrak Sincerity Transparency Responsive

Skandiabanken 81.9 66.8 60.6 60.2

Ikea 81.0 62.3 60.9 63.0

NSB 46.4 37.1 38.6 34.9

Terra 45 (35.1) 28 (17.2) 34.6 (23.9) 34.1 (25.6)

Page 6: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

The Business Impact of Supportive Behavior with the General Public

Note: “% Respondents who Would Recommend” = Top 2 Box (6-7)Source: Norway Annual RepTrak™ 2010

Adj-R2 = 0.767Norway Pulse score

% R

esp

on

den

ts w

ho

Wo

uld

Reco

mm

en

d

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Improve Reputation by 5 Points and Increase Recommendation by 6.3%Analysis shows that if a company is able to improve reputation by 1 point the number of people who would positively recommend the company goes up by 1.26%. In a competitive situation increasing recommendation within the general public would have a dramatic impact on the bottom line reinforcing the benefits of active reputation management.

Page 7: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

What Impacts ’Word of Mouth’

1. Sincerity

2. Responsiveness

3. Transparency

Page 8: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Governance

• Firms are open and transparent about the way they operate

• Behave ethically • Are fair in the way they do business

Page 9: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Reputation with the U.S. General Public vs Norway

Norway US

Page 10: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

• In Canada, India, Thailand and Turkey, Governance is now the #1 driver of reputation

Page 11: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Preventable Crises – Severe Reputational Threat (Coombs 2007)

• Organizational misdeed with no injuries : Stakeholders are deceived without injury.

• Organizational misdeed management misconduct : Laws or regulations are violated by management.

• Organizational misdeed with injuries : Stakeholders are placed at risk by management and injuries occur.

Page 12: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Two Things:

• Perceived lack of governance can be more damaging than product failure, natural disaster, technical accidents

• Products and services losing importance to governance and leadership

Page 13: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

• The Year of the Big Apologies

Page 14: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI
Page 15: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Toyota president testifies before CongressFebruary 25, 2010 -- Updated 0055 GMT (0855 HKT)

Toyoda tears up and pauses for composure as he thanks the audience for their support.

Page 16: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

BMWVolkswagen

(VW)Toyota

RepTrak Score

77,0

76,5

81,4

Bransje Bedrift Tilfredshet Lojalitet

Bilforhandlere BMW 83.7 83.1

Toyota 83.6 85.0

VW 73.0 72.1

Resultater 2010 - Bransjevis

February 2010

Page 17: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Toyota

January 2010

February 2010

April 2010

82,6 80,0 74,6

Page 18: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Products

/Service

s

Innovation

Workplace

Governance

Citizensh

ip

Leadersh

io

Perform

ance0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

January 2010 February 2010 April 2010

Page 19: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Visible Distinctive Consistent Transparent Sincere Responsive0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

January 2010 February 2010 April 2010

Page 20: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

What Happened?• For Toyota car faults had been recorded over 10

years yet the company carried on in denial• For BP the American partners who supplied

rigging equipment and valve technology had known that component standards were not the highest

• The stimulus for remedial action was absent in senior management

• The response of each corporation was poorChiron Reputation Risk Consultants

Page 21: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Why Important for RepTrak Firms

Product vs Corporate Brands• 96% of firms are business to consumer• 66% of firms listed share the same product

and corporate brand name• 24% are retail firms dependent on the

strength of their own name• 10% branded or B2B

Page 22: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Communication and Governance Factors are People-Driven

• People are sincere, not products• Organizations, not products, are open• People, not products, are responsive• People make bad decisions

Page 23: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

Excellent communication – being believable and genuine, providing insight and being accessible.

Reputation Excellence – fulfilling expectations: consistency between what an organization is, what it says it is, and what it does.

C. van Riel

Page 24: Omdømmedagen 2010: Peggy Brønn, BI

In the end it’s all about …