Notice of Appeal, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell ....

8/9/2019 Notice of Appeal, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell ....

1/19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDAFORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;

KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;

RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE

ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendants.

PUBLIC CORRUPTION NOTICE

____________________________________________________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEAL RE RECORD PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND DOC. 37

PUBLISHED CONCLUSIVE PUBLIC CORRUPTION PROOF ON THE RECORD

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM ORDER, DOC. # 37, 07/07/10

1. Plaintiff public corruption victims and record landowners hereby appeal from Defendant

Crooked Judge Honeywells facially fraudulent order, Doc. # 37, 07/07/10:

Plaintiffs seek to prevent the attachment of a lien to property in Case No. 2:07-CV-

228-JES-SPC and seek a reversal of an order issued by this Court in Case No. 2:09-

CV-791, Dkt. 213.

As a matter of law and pursuant to the Separation-of-Powers Doctrine, any involuntary

alienation could not have possibly been any legislative function. Only a court of law could

havepossibly engaged injudicial due process. Here pursuant to the public record, Plaintiffs

held exclusive, unimpeachable, marketable, and unencumbered record title to Lot 15A in

the private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision, PB 3, PG 25 (1912).


2/19

2

PRIMA FACIE IDIOCY OF HONEYWELLS ORDERS, DOC. ## 213, 236; 37, 38

2. As a matter of law and basic logic, no lien couldpossibly attach to Plaintiffs Lot 15A,

PB 3 PG 25 (1912), if the record title to Plaintiffs said riparian Gulf-front property had

transferred to Lee County, Florida. Just like a bungling Government idiot, here Honeywell

made no sense, whatsoever. Here plain and short, Defendant Honeywells purported defense

and claim of a resolution and/orland use regulation were facially idiotic.

HONEYWELL CONCEALED FALSE PRETENSES OFLAND USE REGULATION

3. Here, Honeywell refused to answer plain and short questions such as, e.g., who or which

fictitious lawmaker purportedly regulated or restricted what land use? In particular,

Honeywell knew that the deceptively chosen land use regulation authorities and case law

in said fraudulent judgment and opinion, Doc. # 365, could NOT havepossibly applied,

because here the legal issues were admittedly record title and ownership and NOT any

fictitious land use regulation. Here just like a Government idiot and whore, Honeywell

rambled about frivolity to mislead and deceive and evade the record legal issues.

EMERGENCY: HONEYWELL OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE

4. Rather than recuse herself because of her record idiocy and fraud, Honeywell continued to

obstruct justice and make more facially idiotic & illegal orders, Doc. ## 37, 38.

5. In Case No. 2:09-CV-791, e.g.,Doc. ## 213, 236, Defendant Honeywell threatened and

silenced the Plaintiffs without any authority. Here, Defendant Honeywell illegally deprived

the Plaintiffs of court access for the unlawful and criminal purposes of coercing the Plaintiffs

to refrain from further prosecution. In particular, Honeywell illegally instructed the Clerk of

Court to obstruct and interfere with the orderly filing of Plaintiffs pleadings. See criminal

Complaints to law enforcement.


3/19

3

PLAINTIFFS DEMANDED RELIEF FROM HONEYWELLS IDIOTIC ORDERS

6. Here, Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs were neverdivestedof their unimpeachable record

title to their riparian Gulf-front property against their will. In particular, Honeywell knew that

scam O.R. 569/875 was not, and could not have possibly been any land use and/orpolice

power regulation. As a matter of absolute law, no police power regulation could possibly

transfertitle against a landowners will. Honeywell knew and concealed that the judgment

and opinion in Case No. 2:07-CV-228-JES-SPC were on their faces judicial shit and

conclusive proof of public corruption and conspiracy to defraud and deliberately deprive

under color of fake resolution 569/875, which had never existed.

HONEYWELLS RECORD TRICKERY, DECEPTION, FRAUD, AND FRIVOLITY

7. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge C. E. Honeywell conspired with other Defendants and

Government Officials to perpetrate, e.g., record deception, trickery, and fraud under

fraudulent pretenses of fictitious resolution 569/875:

In a resolution adopted in December 1969 by the Board of Commissioners of Lee

County, Florida, Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land(Resolution 569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9).

HONEYWELL CONCEALED FACIALLY FRAUDULENT OPINION&JUDGMENT

8. Here, Honeywell knew that the judgment and opinion in Case No. 2:07-CV-228-JES-

SPC were facially fraudulent, null, and void. See Doc. # 365; June 15, 2009. The Board of

Commissioners of Lee County, Florida, had never claimed Lot 15A as public land.

HONEYWELL KNEW THAT PLAINTIFFS APPEALED FRAUDULENTJUDGMENT

9. Defendant Honeywell knew that Plaintiffs were the unimpeachable title holders and tax

payers of record, and that several Appeals have been pending regarding the prima facie

extortion and fraud on the public record.


4/19

4

10. Here, judicial whore Honeywell knew that no judgment had everexisted to support any

lien. See Doc. # 365. Here, Def. Honeywell conspired with other Defendants such as, e.g.,

Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack N. Peterson and fraudulently concealed fake land parcels

12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000 and the prima facie illegality

and nullity of the fraudulent judgment and opinion in Case 2:07-cv-00228.

PLAINTIFFS HAD SUED DEFENDANT CROOKED JUDGE C. E. HONEYWELL

11. The Plaintiff public corruption victims had sued Defendant Corrupt U.S. Judge Charlene E.

Honeywell and other Defendant U.S. Agents in theirprivate individual capacities for prima

facie unlawful and criminal acts outside any immunity and official capacity. Here,

Defendant Crooked Honeywell had multiple conflicts of interest and concealed her unlawful

and criminal acts. See 28 U.S.C. 455, 28 U.S.C. 144.

DEFENDANT CROOKED HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCOCT resolution

12. In particular, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell concocted and conspired with other

Defendants and Government Officials to concoct a resolution and/or law for facially

unlawful and criminal purposes of deliberately depriving & defrauding the Plaintiffs and

extorting real property and fees under color of sham claim O.R. 569/875. In the record

absence of any legal description in said Government scam O.R. 569/875, Honeywell

idiotically pretended:

In a resolution adopted in December 1969 by the Board of Commissioners of LeeCounty, Florida, Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land

(Resolution 569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9).

See Case No. 2:09-CV-791, Dkt. 213, p. 5.

Here on the public record, Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired to conceal that

no lawmaker had ever adopted prima facie sham resolution 569/875 and that no legal


5/19

5

description of accreted riparian Lot 15A, S.T.R.A.P. # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, had

appeared in said prima facie scam O.R. 569/875. In particular, Honeywell concealed and

conspired to conceal that any involuntary alienation would have exclusively been ajudicial

function. Here, Honeywell fabricated said judicial trash even though she knew that no

legislative act, resolution, law and/or O.R. 569/875 could havepossiblyinvoluntarily

divestedthe Plaintiffs of their record property. Here plain and short, Honeywell acted like a

judicial whore in obvious contempt of law and order. Here, Honeywells record policy and

custom has been to pervert the law and perpetrate fraud on the Court.

DEF. HONEYWELL FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALED INCOMPREHENSIBLE SCAM

13. Here, Defendant Crooked Honeywell fraudulently concealed that the law did not recognize

any claim as public land and/or resolution 569/875. See also Chapters 95; 73, 74; 712,

Florida Statutes; ADVERSE POSSESSION; EMINENT DOMAIN; FLORIDAS SELF-

ENFORCING MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT.

HONEYWELL CONCEALED NULL & VOID HOAX

14. Here Honeywell knew that said prima facie extortion scheme O.R. 569/875 had lacked any

color, legal description, and legislative signature. No name of any lawmaker and no

legislative history had existed. Just like a pedophile priest, here Honeywell raped innocent

Plaintiffs and obstructed justice and investigation of the record crimes by Defendant

Government Agents.

15. Here, Def. Crooked Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs had fundamental rights to own their

riparian street and up lands on the Gulf of Mexico and exclude Government.

CROOKED HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO COVER UP AND CONCEAL


6/19

6

16. Here, Honeywell covered up, and conspired to cover up, for the prima facie unlawful and

criminal acts of Defendant Crooked Judges John E. Steele, Joel Dubina, Susan H. Black, and

Stanley F. Birch, who had fraudulently concealed Plaintiffs fundamental rights, Doc. ##

338, 365; Case No. 2:07-CV-228:

Property rights would not be fundamental rights since they are based on state law .

See prima facie vile judicial trash, Doc. # 365; D.

Additionally, substantive due process protects only fundamental rights, that is, those

rights which are implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. Such rights are created bythe Constitution, and do not include property rights.

See prima facie vile judicial trash, Doc. # 338, p. 10, B.

EMERGENCY OF RECORD JUDICIAL SHIT AND CORRUPTION

17. Here, no intelligent, rational,fit, and honestjudge, juror, and/or person in Steeles, Dubinas,

Birchs, and Blacks shoes could havepossibly determined such utterly arbitrary, capricious,

and contemptuous shit. Here, said judicial Crooks disrespected and raped the law in bright

day light and then covered up under false pretenses of frivolity and vexatiousness claims.

18. American society has been built upon and around the fundamental Constitutional right to

own property and exclude Government. Here of course, said Government Crooks record

perversion of both Federal and Florida Constitutions was an EMERGENCY of the first order.

EMERGENCY OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION & FRAUD

19. Here, Plaintiff public corruption victims defended against fraudulent claims, defenses,

prima facie scam O.R. 569/875, and said fake land parcels. Judicial whore Honeywell

tarnished the reputation of this Court, and Plaintiffs were absolutely entitled to Honeywells

recusal. Here, the unlawful lien, threats, and extortion under color of scam O.R. 569/875

were EMERGENCIES on the record. See Doc. ## 365; 360.


7/19

8

20. Pursuant to local rule 3.01

(e) Motions of an emergency nature may be considered and determined by the Court

at any time, in its discretion (see also, Rule 4.05). The unwarranted designation of amotion as an emergency motion may result in the imposition of sanctions .

Here, Defendant judicial whore Honeywell was NOT the Court. Defendant objectively

crooked Judge Honeywell has been merely an objectively partial and corrupt judicial officer,

who has been raping the law under color of, e.g., O.R. 569/875 and fake land parcels


8/19

7


9/19


10/19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CLERK'S OFFICE

GUIDE TO SERVICES AND PROCEDURES


11/19

Florida Attorney General

Advisory Legal Opinion

Number: AGO 90-69

Date: August 20, 1990

Subject: Recording of documents by clerk

Mr. Victor J. TroianoAttorney for Clerk of theCircuit Court of Polk CountyPost Office Drawer 829Lakeland, Florida 33802

RE: CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS--RECORDS--recording of documentsby clerk when documents not required or authorized by law to berecorded. s. 28.222, F.S.

Dear Mr. Troiano:

On behalf of Mr. E. D. "Bud" Dixon, Clerk of the Court of the TenthJudicial Circuit of Polk County, you have asked subtantially thefollowing question:

Is the clerk of the circuit court required to record documentswhich are not specified in s. 28.222, F.S., or any other section ofthe Florida Statutes?

In sum:

The clerk of circuit court may not accept any document forrecording in the official records of the county which the law doesnot authorize or require him or her to record.

You state that recently the clerk's office has been receiving alarge number of documents for recordation which are not identifiedin s. 28.222, F.S., or authorized or required to be recorded byother statutes. These documents have included living wills, childcustody agreements entered into between the parties themselveswithout court approval, foreign state birth certificates, foreigncountry birth certificates, and documents written in a foreignlanguage without an English translation. The clerk of circuit courtis concerned that filing all original documents which are presentedfor recording, without regard for legal requirements for filing orconsideration of the nature of the document, will create confusion

7/12/2010 Advisory Legal Opinion - Recording of

myfloridalegal.com//46B3C51EA99D 1


12/19

in the official records.

Pursuant to s. 28.222, F.S., the clerk of the circuit court is therecorder of all instruments "that he may be required or authorized

by law to record" in the county which he serves as clerk.[1] Allinstruments are to be recorded in one general series of booksdesignated the "Official Records."[2] The clerk is statutorilyrequired to record the following kinds of instruments:

"(a) Deeds, leases, bills of sale, agreements, mortgages, noticesor claims of lien, notices of levy, tax warrants, tax executions,and other instruments relating to the ownership, transfer, orencumbrance of or claims against real or personal property or anyinterest in it; extensions, assignments, releases, cancellations,or satisfactions of mortgages and liens; and powers of attorneyrelating to any of the instruments.(b) Notices of lis pendens . . . .(c) Judgments, including certified copies of judgments, entered by

any court of this state . . . and assignments, releases, andsatisfactions of the judgments.(d) That portion of a certificate of discharge, separation, orservice which indicates the character of discharge, separation, orservice of any citizen of this state with respect to the military,air, or naval forces of the United States. . . .(e) Notices of liens for taxes payable to the United States, andcertificates discharging, partially discharging, or releasing theliens, in accordance with the laws of the United States.(f) Certified copies of petitions, with schedules omitted,commencing proceedings under the Bankruptcy Act of the United

States . . . .(g) Any other instruments required or authorized by law to berecorded."[3]

This office has previously stated that the clerk of circuit court,although a constitutional officer, possesses only such powers ashave been expressly or by necessary implication granted bystatute.[4] The clerk of court's power to act must clearly appearfrom the particular statute and record to which it applies.[5]Further, because of the statutory nature of the clerk's authority,his official actions, in order to be binding upon others, must bein conformity with such statutes.[6]

In this regard, s. 28.222(1), F.S., provides that the clerk of thecircuit court shall be "the recorder of all instruments that he maybe required or authorized by law to record in the county where heis clerk." As such, the clerk is directed to record in the officialrecords of the county the kind of instruments specificallyenumerated in s. 28.222, F.S., and any other instruments orcertified copies of instruments required or authorized by law to berecorded in the official records of the county.[7]




13/19

A legislative direction as to how a thing shall be done is, ineffect, a prohibition against its being done in any other way.[8]Thus, the statutory direction that only those instruments requiredor authorized by law may be recorded constitutes a prohibitionagainst recording other types of instruments. In addition it is thegeneral rule that records must be made pursuant to law and not indisregard thereof.[9]

Therefore, it is my opinion that the clerk of circuit court is notobligated to record any document or instrument which is notspecifically required or authorized to be recorded by s. 28.222,F.S., or other provision of law.

Sincerely,

Robert A. ButterworthAttorney General

RAB/tgh-----------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Section 28.222(1), F.S.

[2] Section 28.222(2), F.S.

[3] Section 28.222(3), F.S.

[4] See, AGO's 86-38, 80-59, 79-70, and 78-95.

[5] Ferlita v. State, 380 So.2d 1118 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1980); Pan

American World Airways v. Gregory, 96 So.2d 669 (3 D.C.A. Fla.,1957).

[6] Security Finance Company v. Gentry, 109 So. 220 (Fla. 1926);Overholser v. Overstreet, 383 So.2d 953 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1980). See

generally, 14 C.J.S. Clerks of Courts s. 33 (1939).

[7] For examples of other documents authorized by law to berecorded, see, e.g., s. 28.29, F.S. (recording of orders andjudgments of the courts in the official records); s. 55.10, F.S.(liens on real estate when a certified copy of a judgment, order,or decree is recorded in the official records); and s. 695.15, F.S.(recording conveyances lost by fire).

[8]Alsop v. Pierce, 19 So.2d 799, 804-805 (Fla. 1944); Thayer v.

State, 335 So.2d 815, 817 (Fla. 1976).

[9] Coplan Pipe and Supply Company v. McCann, 132 So.2d 632 (3




14/19

D.C.A. Fla., 1961); and see, AGO 75-214 (a certified copy of anamendment to a certificate of incorporation changing the name of acorporation, which copy is received from the Department of State,is not authorized or required by law to be recorded in the officialrecords of a county).




15/19

skip to content

Enter search here

Keep up with our latest

news and consumer

information:

Newsletter

RSS feed

Audio Msg

Twitter

Fraud Hotline

1-866-966-7226

Contact Us

Advisory Legal Opinion - AGO 90-69

Print Versio

Number: AGO 90-69Date: August 20, 1990

Subject: Recording of documents by clerk

Mr. Victor J. Troiano

Attorney for Clerk of the

Circuit Court of Polk County

Post Office Drawer 829

Lakeland, Florida 33802

RE: CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS--RECORDS--recording of documents by clerk

when documents not required or authorized by law to be recorded. s. 28.222

F.S.

Dear Mr. Troiano:

On behalf of Mr. E. D. "Bud" Dixon, Clerk of the Court of the Tenth

Judicial Circuit of Polk County, you have asked subtantially the following

question:

Is the clerk of the circuit court required to record documents which are

not specified in s. 28.222, F.S., or any other section of the Florida

Statutes?

In sum:

The clerk of circuit court may not accept any document for recording in th

official records of the county which the law does not authorize or require

him or her to record.

You state that recently the clerk's office has been receiving a large

number of documents for recordation which are not identified in s. 28.222,

F.S., or authorized or required to be recorded by other statutes. These

documents have included living wills, child custody agreements entered int

between the parties themselves without court approval, foreign state birth

certificates, foreign country birth certificates, and documents written in

a foreign language without an English translation. The clerk of circuit

court is concerned that filing all original documents which are presented

for recording, without regard for legal requirements for filing or

consideration of the nature of the document, will create confusion in the

official records.

Pursuant to s. 28.222, F.S., the clerk of the circuit court is the recorde

of all instruments "that he may be required or authorized by law to record

in the county which he serves as clerk.[1] All instruments are to be

recorded in one general series of books designated the "Official

Records."[2] The clerk is statutorily required to record the following

kinds of instruments:

"(a) Deeds, leases, bills of sale, agreements, mortgages, notices or claim

of lien, notices of levy, tax warrants, tax executions, and other

instruments relating to the ownership, transfer, or encumbrance of or

claims against real or personal property or any interest in it; extensions

Today is July 12, 20

HOME

AG Bill McCollumOffice Information

Programs and Units

Employment

Open Government

Crime and Fraud

Consumer Protection

Citizen Safety

Victims' Services

AG Opinions

Enter search GO

Enter email address

Submit




16/19

assignments, releases, cancellations, or satisfactions of mortgages and

liens; and powers of attorney relating to any of the instruments.

(b) Notices of lispendens . . . .

(c) Judgments, including certified copies of judgments, entered by any

court of this state . . . and assignments, releases, and satisfactions of

the judgments.

(d) That portion of a certificate of discharge, separation, or service

which indicates the character of discharge, separation, or service of any

citizen of this state with respect to the military, air, or naval forces o

the United States. . . .

(e) Notices of liens for taxes payable to the United States, andcertificates discharging, partially discharging, or releasing the liens, i

accordance with the laws of the United States.

(f) Certified copies of petitions, with schedules omitted, commencing

proceedings under the Bankruptcy Act of the United States . . . .

(g) Any other instruments required or authorized by law to be recorded."[3

This office has previously stated that the clerk of circuit court, althoug

a constitutional officer, possesses only such powers as have been expressl

or by necessary implication granted by statute.[4] The clerk of court's

power to act must clearly appear from the particular statute and record to

which it applies.[5] Further, because of the statutory nature of the

clerk's authority, his official actions, in order to be binding upon

others, must be in conformity with such statutes.[6]

In this regard, s. 28.222(1), F.S., provides that the clerk of the circuit

court shall be "the recorder of all instruments that he may be required or

authorized by law to record in the county where he is clerk." As such, the

clerk is directed to record in the official records of the county the kind

of instruments specifically enumerated in s. 28.222, F.S., and any other

instruments or certified copies of instruments required or authorized by

law to be recorded in the official records of the county.[7]

A legislative direction as to how a thing shall be done is, in effect, a

prohibition against its being done in any other way.[8] Thus, the statutor

direction that only those instruments required or authorized by law may be

recorded constitutes a prohibition against recording other types of

instruments. In addition it is the general rule that records must be made

pursuant to law and not in disregard thereof.[9]

Therefore, it is my opinion that the clerk of circuit court is not

obligated to record any document or instrument which is not specifically

required or authorized to be recorded by s. 28.222, F.S., or other

provision of law.

Sincerely,

Robert A. Butterworth

Attorney General

RAB/tgh-----------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Section 28.222(1), F.S.

[2] Section 28.222(2), F.S.

[3] Section 28.222(3), F.S.

[4] See, AGO's 86-38, 80-59, 79-70, and 78-95.

[5] Ferlita v. State, 380 So.2d 1118 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1980); Pan American

World Airways v. Gregory, 96 So.2d 669 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1957).




17/19

[6] Security Finance Company v. Gentry, 109 So. 220 (Fla. 1926); Overholse

v. Overstreet, 383 So.2d 953 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1980). See generally, 14

C.J.S. Clerks of Courts s. 33 (1939).

[7] For examples of other documents authorized by law to be recorded, see,

e.g., s. 28.29, F.S. (recording of orders and judgments of the courts in

the official records); s. 55.10, F.S. (liens on real estate when a

certified copy of a judgment, order, or decree is recorded in the official

records); and s. 695.15, F.S. (recording conveyances lost by fire).

[8] Alsop v. Pierce, 19 So.2d 799, 804-805 (Fla. 1944); Thayer v. State,

335 So.2d 815, 817 (Fla. 1976).

[9] Coplan Pipe and Supply Company v. McCann, 132 So.2d 632 (3 D.C.A. Fla.

1961); and see, AGO 75-214 (a certified copy of an amendment to a

certificate of incorporation changing the name of a corporation, which cop

is received from the Department of State, is not authorized or required by

law to be recorded in the official records of a county).




18/19

Revised: 04/2005 Page 1 of 11

A BRIEF GUIDE TO SERVICES AND PROCEDURES

PART ONE: CIVIL CASE INFORMATION

I FILING FEDERAL CIVIL SUITS:

A. Fees (28 U.S.C. 1914) - Cash, business or personal check, or money ordermade payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court for each case at the time ofopening the case. (currently $150.00 for civil actions and $5.00 for habeasproceedings.)

B. Civil Cover Sheet, Form JS-44 [Local Rule 1.05(e)] - The Civil Cover Sheet,Form JS-44, must be completed in its entirety and submitted with thecomplaint. An original signature as well as Florida Bar number must be onboth the civil cover sheet and the complaint. The civil cover sheet does notreplace or supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers.Instructions for completion of this form are on the reverse of the form.Particular care should be given to the following:

1. County of Residence: This is frequently omitted and should becompleted for the first named plaintiff, except in U.S. plaintiff case,and defendant, in U.S. plaintiff cases only.

2. Citizenship of Principal Parties: (Should be completed only whendiversity is the basis of jurisdiction.) This section requires only one Xfor first plaintiff and one X for first defendant. Note: Corporationsshould not be marked as citizens.

3. Cause of Action/Nature of Suit: Do not cite the jurisdictional statuteunder the Cause of Action. This section requires the U.S. Civil Statute

under which you are filing and a brief statement of cause. Example:15 U.S.C. 1051 - Trademark Infringement. (Statements such as"Social Security Disability" are unacceptable.) Diversity cases shouldalways be cited under 28 USC 1332 (nature of suit will vary). Onlyone box should be checked in the Nature of Suit section.

4. Dollar Demand: This is frequently omitted, but required if a specificdollar amount appears in the complaint.

5. Jury Demand: Check "Yes" box if jury trial is demanded in thecomplaint. (See, however, Rule 38, Fed.R.Civ.P.) Also, remember

that the title of the pleading should read and Demand for Jury Trial,pursuant to Local Rule 1.06(a).

6. Related Cases: Reference pending cases.

7. Date and Signature of Attorney: The JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet mustbear the original signature of the attorney submitting the form assuringits accuracy and completion.


19/19

C. Complaint (8 " x 11" paper, double spaced. Local Rules 1.05 - 1.06) -Only the original complaint is required to be filed with the Court. Thecomplaint must be signed by a member of the Bar of this Court withdesignation "Trial Counsel" by the name of trial counsel. The typed name ofcounsel with complete address, telephone number and Florida Bar numbermust appear in the signature block.

D. Subsequent case papers (Local Rule 1.05 - 8 " x 11" paper, double

spaced) - Each case paper filed with this Court must contain the following:

1. The properly titled district and division.

2. A brief style of the case.

3. The entire case number including the judge number. The judgenumbers are as follows:

District MagistrateTampa Division:

17 - Elizabeth A. Kovachevich MAP - Mark A. Pizzo23 - Steven D. Merryday TGW - Thomas G. Wilson24 - Susan C. Bucklew TBM -Thomas B. McCoun, III26 - Richard A. Lazzara EAJ - Elizabeth A. Jenkins27 - James D. Whittemore MSS - Mary S. Scriven30 - James S. Moody, Jr.15 - William J. Castagna

Orlando Division:19 - Patricia C. Fawsett KAS - Karla A. Spaulding22 - Anne C. Conway DAB - David A. Baker

28 - John Antoon II JGG - James G. Glazebrook31 - Gregory A. Presnell18 - G. Kendall Sharp06 - George C. Young

Jacksonville Division:20 - Harvey E. Schlesinger HTS - Howard T. Snyder25 - Henry Lee Adams, Jr. TEM - Thomas E. Morris32 - Timothy J. Corrigan MCR - Monte C. Richardson12 - Howell W. Melton MMH - Marcia Morales Howard16 - John H. Moore, II

Ocala Division:10 - Wm. Terrell Hodges GRJ - Gary R. Jones

Ft. Myers Division:29 - John E. Steele DNF - Douglas N. Frazier33 - Virginia Covington SPC - Sheri Polster Chappell

Notice of Appeal, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell ....

Documents

Transcript of Notice of Appeal, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell ....