NOTE ON THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOANA II

8/7/2019 NOTE ON THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOANA II

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/note-on-the-achievements-of-the-implementation-of-goana-ii 1/18

SENEGAL REPUBLIC

---------------

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

---------------Society for the Management and Exploitation

of the Senegal River Delta ---------------

S. A. E. D.

March 2010

SUMMARY

NOTE ON THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOANA II IN THE SENEGAL RIVER VALLEY

--------------



2

INTRODUCTION. ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 4

I. HOT DRY SEASON CROP YEAR 2009. ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 4 I.1.Preparation of the hot dry season crop year 2009. ................................ ................................ ....................... 4

I.2. Financing of HDS 2009. ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 5

I.3. Area cultivated during the hot dry season 2009................................. ................................ .......................... 5

I.4. Evaluation of the production of paddy during the hot dry season 2009. ................................ ........................ 7 I.5. Commercialisation of paddy in HDS 2009 ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 7

I.6. Value-additin of the production of Rice in HDS 2009. ................................ ................................ ................... 9

II. WINTERING CROP YEAR 2009_2010................................. ................................ ................................ ......... 10 II.1. Financing agricultural production for the wintering 2009_2010................................ ................................ .. 10

II.2. Previsions of value-addition and wintering ouput for 2009_2010 ................................ ............................... 11

II.2.1.Distribution of cultivated area by Delegation for the wintering 2009_2010................................ ............. 11 II.2.2. Distribution of cultivated area by produce for the wintering 2009_2010 ................................ ............... 11 II.2.3. Comparison between the wintering 2008-2009 and 2009-2010................................ ............................ 12

II.3. Evaluation of the production of paddy during the wintering 2009_2010................................. ..................... 12

III. COLD DRY SEASON CROP YEAR 2009_2010. ................................ ................................ ....................... 13

III.1. Financing the production of CDS 2009_2010 ................................ ................................ ........................... 13 III.2. Previsions of value-addition and ouputs of CDS 2009_2010 ................................ ................................ ..... 13

III.3. Marketing of ognon 2009_2010................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 14

IV. SYNTHESIS OF VALUE ADDITION IN 2ND YEAR GOANA................................ ................................ ......... 15 IV.1 Cultivated area ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 15

IV.2 Value-addition of production GOANA II ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 16

V. PREVISIONS AND VALUE ADDITION FOR THE GOANA III PROGRAMME ................................ ..................... 16 7. CONCLUSION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 18

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 : Results of the CNCAS credit comittee for the Hot Dry Season 2009................................ ..................... 5 Table 2 : Previsions and the achievements of the Hot Dry Season 2009................................ ............................. 5 Table 3 : Yields and production of rice by Delegation for the HDS 2009................................ ............................ 7 Table 4 : Reference price of a kilogram of rice in the Hot Dry Season 2009 (F CFA) ................................ ......... 7 Table 5 : Value addition of the production in the Hot Dry Season 2009 ................................ .......................... 10 Table 6: Results of CNCAS credit commitees for the wintering 2009_2010 ................................ ...................... 10 Table 7 : Previsions of value addition and achievements of the wintering 2009_2010 (ha) ............................... 11 Table 8 : Yields and provisionalproduction of rice by Delegation for the wintering 2009_2010........................ 12 Table 9 : Results of the CNCAS credit commitee for the CDS 2009_2010................................ ........................ 131 Table 10 : Previsions of value addition and achievements for the CDS 2009_2010 (ha) ................................ ..132

Table 11: Previsions of CDS production«««««««««««««««««««««««««««««...12

Table 12 : Evolution of ognon prices in the Senegal River Valley (F CFA/kg). ................................ ................. 12 Table 13 : Cultivated area in GOANA II and comparison with results of GOANA I (ha) ................................ .. 13

Tableau14 : Value addition of production in GOANA II««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.14

Table 15 : Previsions of value addition in GOANA III (ha) ................................ ................................ .............. 15

Table 16 : Per hectare dose of utilized inputs in the Senegal River Valley«««««««««««..15

Table 17: Fertilizer needs GOANA III«««««««««««««««««««««««««««««...16



3

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 : Distribution of cultivated area by Delegation for the HDS 2009 ................................ ........................ 6 Figure 2 : Distribution of cultivated area by product for the HDS 2009 ................................ ............................. 6 Figure 3 : Comparison of areasown with rice between Hot Dry Season 2008 and 2009 ................................ ..... 6 Figure 4 : Distribution of sown area by Delegation for the wintering 2009_2010 ................................ ............ 11 Figure 5 : Distribution of sown area by product for the wintering 2009_2010................................ .................. 12 Figure 6 : Comparison of sown area between wintering 2008_2009 and 2009_2010................................ ....... 12

Figure 7 : Comparison of total cultivated area in GOANA I and GOANA II (ha)«««««««««««.12

Figure 8 : Comparison of cultivated area (ha) in RICE (GOANA I and GOANA II)««««««««««..12



4

Introduction.

The Grand Agricultural Campaign for Food and Abundance (GACFA), established by the Chief

of State, has evoked in the Senegal River Valley, a very keen interest on the part of Producersand other Stakeholders.

From the onset and as the Hot Dry Season crop year 2008 progressed, which shall be placed

under the authority of the "National Programme for Rice Self-Sufficiency" (NPRSS)1 by 2012,the keen interest shown could be seen by the exceptional achievements and perspectives for future crop-years indicate highly positive results.

The present note synthetises the notable achievements in Hot Dry Season 2009 and theresults expected in 2009_2010 (Wintering and Dry Cold Season)

I. HOT DRY SEASON CROP-YEAR 2009.

This crop-year was particularly marked by :

- the subvention of 45% on the price of inputs (fertilizers), decided by the State of Senegal,

- the timely delivery of agricultural inputs to producers,- the execution of a targetted programme to upgrade irrigated perimeters within the

framework of the Irrigated Perimeters Maintenance Fund (IPMF).

These mesures, essentially meant to boost the productivity and production of rice paddy, have

permitted the attaining of results never before achieved in the history of irrigated agriculture inthe Senegal River Valley.

Thi programme set up to relaunch production had evoked very keen interest and mobilised allthe Stakeholders, which was seen by:

- An increase in CNCAS participation to finance the crop-year,- Increase in cultivated area under r ice,

- Remobilization of all the Stakeholders accompagnying the Programme.

I.1. Preparation of the Off-Season Hot crop-year 2009.

As a part of the preparation of the Nartional Programme for Rice Self-Sufficiency (NPRSS), theSAED had, at the internal level, held a workshop to debate on the strategies and usefulmeasures for value addition of area falling within the framework of the Programme. After thisworkshop:

- the field personnel was informed and sensitized about the expected objectives of thecrop-year,

- the potential areas were identified,

- the necessary measures to execute the IPMF Programme (Irrigated PerimetersMaintenance Fund) were taken,

- action plans were decided upon.

These measures as well as those taken by the Ministry on the inputs have contributed in largemeasure to the success of the crop-year .

1The Government adopted, during an interministerial Council held on 4 january 2008, a Programme «Self-sufficiency in rice production by

2012 » which it was decided to implement from HDS 2008.



5

I.2. Finance for the crop-year HDS 2009.

The CNCAS credit committee met on 12 and 13 February 2009 and the results are compiled in

the following table :

Table 1 : Results of the CNCAS credit committee for the Hot Dry Season 2009

Programme proposed Accepted programmeAchieved

programmeNumber Area (HA) Outlay (FCFA) Number Area (HA) Outlay (FCFA)

CNCAS St_Louis 70 2 106 593 556 881 67 1 821 514 925 160 445 862 026

CNCAS R. Toll 22 785 295 290 157 22 685 198 803 933 140 437 941

Total Dagana 92 2 891 888 847 038 89 2 506 713 729 093 586 299 967

CNCAS Ndioum 138 3 548 814 668 890 137 3 510 971 309 852 354 790 924

Total Podor 138 3 548 814 668 890 137 3 510 971 309 852 354 790 924

Total Valley 230 6 439 1 703 515 928 226 6 016 1 685 038 945 941 090 891

% 98% 93% 99%

Results HDS

2008 219 5 509 1 156 696 090 208 5 233 1 106 393 822 446 128 210

Variation 11 930 546 819 838 18 783 578 645 123 494 962 681

Most requests were accepted subject to the provision that accrued obligations be reimbursed or thatwintering 2008_2009 stock be stored. When compared with the Dry Hot Season 2008, the volume of creditdisbursed increased by 52%, going up from 1 106 393 822 F CFA to 1 685 038 945 F CFA. However, ascertain OP had difficulties in raising ressources, financing achieved for the crop-year HDS 2009 was 941 090 841 F CFA as against 446 128 210 F CFA for the preceding crop-year (HDS 2008 ), i.e., an increase bymore than 100% .

I.3. Cultivated area in the Hot Dry Season 2009.

Table 2 : Previsions and achievements in the Hot Dry Season 2009

Produce Previsions Achievements (ha) Level of

(ha) Dagana Podor Matam Bakel Valley Achievement

Rice 20 060 18 653 3 893 218 22 764 113% Lady·s Finger 2 205 9 296 30 335 15% Sweet potato 80 99 3 2 104 130% Groundnut 530 391 54 3 448 85% Others2 430 338 419 131 887 206%

TOTAL 23 305 19 490 4 665 383 0 24 539 105%

HDS _2008 16 970 10 660 4 008 178 0 14 846 87%

A total of 24 539 hectares were sown on the left bank of Senegal River, or a level of achievement of 105% as against the previsions.

2Others : Banana plantations, citrus f ruits and market-gardening



6

Compared to the the crop-year Hot Dry Season 2008, the cultivated area has recorded an augmentation of

65%.

F i

¡ ¢ £

¤

¥

¦

i§ t ¢ i ¡ ti © © f

¡ lti t £ ¢ £ ¨

¦

£ l £

ti© f © ¢ t £

¦

!

F i"

# $ %

&

'

(

i) t $ i0 #

ti 1 2 1 f 3

# lti4 5

t % 6 5 $ % 5 0

7 8

$

1

6 #

3 t f 1 $ t 9

%

@ ( A &

B B

C

A total area of 22D

64 hectares was sown with rice on the Left Bank of the Senegal River, i.e., alevel of achievement of 113% as compared to the predetermined objectives.

F iE

F G H

I

P C Q R

S T

G iU

Q

V i V T

G H

T U

Q wV wit W

G iX

H Y H twH H

V

Q t a

G

b

c

H

T U

Q

V

d e e

f

T V

g

d e e

h

9757

3330

132

13219

18653

3893

218

22764

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

i p q p r p s t u t v M p w p x V

p y y ée

SS � 2008 SS � 2009

Distribution of cultivated areaby produce

Groundnut 2%

Lady¶s Fi�

g� �

1%

Others 4%

Sweet Potato 0%

Rice 93%

Valley : 24 539 ha SAED/DDAR/CSE, HDS_2009

Distribution of cultivated area by Delegation

Matam 2% Podor

19%

Dagana 79%

Valley: 24 539 ha SAED/DDAR/CSE, HDS_2009

For this crop-year, value additionconcerned mainly Dagana and Podor Delegations with

�

9% and 19% of sownarea, respectively ; whereas in MalamDélégation, the level of cultivated area

still remains very meagre (2%).

The dominant crop cultivated duringthe Hot Dry Season 2009 is rice, as inthe case of preceding crop-years, with93% of the sown area, followeddistantly by emerging crops such asgroundnut and lady·s finger.



7

In this crop-year, an increase of 72% has been recorded for rice. Nearly 82% of area sown with rice are inDagana Delegation, followed by that of Podor .

I.4. Evaluation of production of paddy in Hot Dry Season 2009.

To evaluate the production of paddy in the Hot Dry Season 2009, the method utilised was the « squaremethod »3.

This method is based on a random sampling of parcels in the total population of parcelscultivated (sampling rate determined in function of area effectively cultivated in the concernedcropping season).

The average yield per hectare is 6.72 tonnes and the production of paddy is estimated to be 148 076 tonnes.

Table 3 : Yields and production of rice by Delegation for the HDS 2009

AREA AVERAGE ESTIMATEDDELEGATIONS CULTIVATED YIELD PRODUCTION

(ha) (t/ha) (tonne)

Dagana 18 653 6,76 122 287 Podor 3 893 6,55 24 947 Matam 218 5,67 842

TOTAL VALLEY 22 764 6,72 148 076

Most of thepaady production is concentrated in Dagana (82.5%) and Podor (17%) Delegations. Itmay be noted that particular attention has been paid to the anti-avian measures by the Ministrythrough the auspices of the Directorate for Plant Protection.

I.5. Commercialisation of rice paddy in HDS 2009

The workshop for launching commercialisation was held on 02 July 2009 at CIFA (Ndiaye Centre),Saint_Louis.

The occasion was seized by the sectoral Stakeholders to come to an agreement on the per kilogramreference price on the basis of a coefficient of transformation of 63% and a transformation cost of 16 F CFA/kg.

Table 4 : Reference price per kilogram of rice in the Hot Dry Season 2009 (F CFA)

Paddy Polished Rice Rice Polished at

Dakar Farm Gate Tiles Factory Floor Price

125 240 260

3The sampling square is made by by rods and chains (side width : 3,163 meters, to obtain an area of

10 m²). It should be randomly aligned in the parcel.



8

The Hot Dry Season crop-year 2009 was exceptionnal from thef point of view of area sown aswell as attained production of rice. Furthermore, marketing difficulties were noted essentiallydue to falling global prices of rice. But, owing to the concertation with the different Stakeholdersby the special CRD organised by the Ministry of Commerce at Saint-Louis and differentsreunions at the Ministry of Agriculture on the question, there was a marked improvement in thesituation.

To resolve the problem of stock disposal of local rice, a marketing study was undertaken,financed by the French Development Agency (FDA), and the plan is presented as follows.

PLAN PROPOSED FOR AMELIORATION OF MARKETING SYSTEM

Re-establish the confidence between Producers, Rice-Processers and Shopkeepers andintroducing contractual relations in the context of real partnerships at the local scale. This plan

shall permit :

± The Producer to sell paddy rapidly (prepare the next crop-year)

± The Rice-Processer to run his factory regularly

± The Wholesaler to regularly procure polished rice of sufficient quality and quantity

± The Agricultural Credit to rapidly settle credit requirements for the crop-year and

minimize risks (domiciliation, nantissement)

NEW MARKETING PLAN OF THE VFS



9

I.6. Value addition de the production of Rice de the HDS 2009.

The valeur primaire de the production (paddy + paille) est estimée à 21,619 milliards de F CFA

tandis que the secondaire (rice blanc, son and balle) est évaluée à 26,833 milliards de F CFA.



10

Table 5 : Value addition of the production of the Hot Dry Season 2009

Delegations Sown area Paddy production Primary valueaddition

Secondaryvalue addition

(ha) (Tonne) (Million Fcfa) (Million Fcfa)

Dagana 18 653 122 287 17 854 22 160Podor 3 893 24 947 3 642 4 520

Matam 218 842 123 153

TOTAL VALLEY HDS 09 22 764 148 076 21 619 26 833

HDS 08 13 219 100 141 14 621 18 147

Ecart 9 545 47 935 6 998 8 686

II. CROP-YEAR WINTERING 2009_2010.

The crop-year wintering 2009_2010 was prepared in the context of launching the 2nd Year of the Great

Agricultural Campaign for Food and Abundance (GACFA). To this effect, a coordination meeting of theSAED, regrouping the totality of technicians was held on Monday 25 May 2009 at the Matam Delegation,under the chairmanship of its Director General.

II.1. Financing agricultural production for the wintering 2009_2010

The two credit commitees of the CNCAS were held from 22 to 26 June 2009 and from 21 to 24 July 2009. The following table presents the volume of financing for agriculural productionallocated for the wintering 2009_2010.

Table 6: Results of CNCAS credit commitees for the wintering 2009_2010

PROGRAMME PROPOSED ACCEPTED PROGRAMME Achieved

programme(FCFA)

Number Area (HA) Outlay Number Area Outlay(F CFA) (HA) (F CFA)

CNCAS St_louis 202 8 324 2 409 349 026 126 4 530 1 143 262 008 878 281 198

CNCAS R. Toll 145 4 475 1 359 122 120 145 3 926 941 814 115 612 171 784

Total Dagana 347 12 799 3 768 471 146 271 8 456 2 085 076 123 1 490 452 982

CNCAS Ndioum 206 5 526 1 313 192 376 199 5 434 1 347 942 246 766 400 529

Total Podor 206 5 526 1 313 192 376 199 5 434 1 347 942 246 766 400 529

CNCAS Matam 137 3 633 514 386 844 133 3 551 401 165 850 345 767 726

Total Matam 137 3 633 514 386 844 133 3 551 401 165 850 345 767 726

VALLEY WI N 09/10 690 21 958 5 596 050 366 603 17 441 3 834 184 219 2 602 621 237

% 87% 79% 69%

VALLEY WI N 08/09 709 23 385 4 970 496 358 585 16 606 3 394 330 198 2 738 230 599

Variation -19 -1 427 625 554 008 18 835 439 854 021 -135 609 362

As against the stated need of 5,596 Billion (equivalent to 21 958 ha) the input financing programmeallocated for rice-cropping by the CNCAS was of the order of 3,834 Billion FCFA (equivalent to 17 441ha) for the wintering 2009_2010, as compared to 3,394 billion F CFA for the crop-year 2008_2009, i.e.,an augmentation of 13% in the volume of credit. However, the financing disbursed by the CNCAS for the crop-year wintering 2009/2010 was 2,602,621,237 F CFA as compared to 2,738,230,599 FCFA, i.e.,a reduction of nearly 5%.



11

II.2. Previsions of value addition and achievements for the wintering 2009_2010

The previsions of value addition for the Ninth Mission Statement is 98,519 hectares of which 65% isreserved for riziculture whand 30% for the cassava programme in the zone of the Guiers Lake.

Table 7 : Previsions of value addition and the achievements de the wintering 2009_2010 (ha)

Produce Previsions Achievements (ha) Level of

(ha) Dagana Podor Matam Bakel Valley Achievement

Rice 63 800 23 003 7 420 4 757 27 35 206 55%

Corn 2 344 0 81 120 152 353 15% Sorghum 500 49 182 199 430 86% Lady·s Finger 530 3 143 27 17 189 36% Cassava 30 000 100 4 104 0% Groundnut 140 476 3,93 2 46 528 377% Others4 1 205 712 429 41 197 1 379 114%

TOTAL 98 519 24 294 8 126 5 128 642 38 189 39%

Win 2008_2009 46 930 26 603 8 701 4 767 828 40 899 87%

The level of achievement, compared to the previsions, is 39%. The achievements for the wintering2008_2009, for the same period, was 40,899 ha compared to 38,189 ha this year, i.e., a reduction of 7%. The overlapping between the crop-years Hot Dry Season 2009 and wintering 2009_2010 could partiallyjustify the reduction in value addition owing to :

- Inadequate fleet of combine harvesters for the harvest of rice in the hot dry season (freeing of plots allotted for double culture)

- eligibility for CNCAS financing for certain GIE - inadequacy in the fleet of tractors for tillage cultivation- frequent power cuts

The low level of global achievement (39%) was particularly due to the non-implementation of the cassavaprogramme in the zone of the Guiers Lake.

II.2.1. Distribution of cultivated area by Delegation for the wintering 2009_2010

Most of the area (64%) newly cultivated is in Dagana Delegation de Dagana, foolowed by far by that of Podor (21%) and that of Matam (13.5%) ; in the case of the Bakel Delegation, owing to development worksnecessitating the closure of certain perimeters, the area utilized still remains very small, as in the case of preceding crop-years.

Figure 4: Distribution of sown area by Delegation for the wintering 2009_2010

II.2.2. Distribution of cultivated area by product for the wintering 2009_2010

For this crop-year, rice remains the principal crop with 93% of sown area ; whereas in the case of other produce, the area covered is negligible. As in the preceding wintering, two-thirds (2/3) of the area sownwith rice is concentrated in the Dagana Delegation.

4Others : Banana plantations, citrus f ruits and market-gardening

Di�

�

�

i�

�

�

i� �

�

�

� �

l�

i� �

�

�

�

� � � �

�

�

Delegati� �

P�

�

%

M

t

j

k

% B

kl

l

%

m

n o

6k

%

Vallée:

7 8

8

a SAE

/

A

/

SE,

iv

z

{



12

Figure 5 : Distribution of sown area by product for the wintering 2009_2010

Répart i t ion des superf icies cult ivées par spéculat ion

Maïs

1%

Sorgho

1%

Gombo

0%

M anioc

0%Arachide

1%Autres

4%

Riz

93 %

V al lée: 37 82 8 ha SAED/DDAR/ CSE, Hiv 200 9_2 010

II.2.3. Comparison between Wintering 2008-2009 and 2009-2010

Figure 6 : Comparison in the sown area between wintering 2008_2009 and 2009_2010

As compared to achievements of the wintering 2008_2009, the cultivated area has fallen by 7%. With theexception of sorghum and groundnut, the sown area of other produce has regressed.

II.3. Evaluation of the production of paddy in Wintering 2009_2010.

To evaluate the production of paddy in the wintering 2009_2010, the method used is the « squaremethod », data analysis is currently being undertaken and the following table shows the initialtendencies :Table 8 : Yields and provisional production of rice by Delegation for the wintering 2009_2010

Area Average ExpectedObservationsDelegations cultivated yield production

(ha) (t/ha) (tonne)

Dagana 23,003 5.75 132,267Yield to be conf ir med after

receipt of f inal results

Podor 7,420 6 44,520 Final results

Matam 4,757 5.79 27,543 Final results

Bakel 27 5 135Yield to be conf ir med after

receipt of f inal results

Entire Valley 35,207 5.6 204,465

While waiting for the receipt of final results, a slight dip in average yield may be noted this year as compared to that of the previous year (5.6 t/ha compared to 5.96 t/ha). This di pis mostly seen

in the Central Delta sector of Dagana Delegation. The causes of the counter-performance in thissector may be explained by the following factors :

| 5

} } }

~ }

} } }

~

5 } } }

}

} } }

5 } } }

}

} } }

5 } } }

}

} } }

Compar i

on in

own area etween 008_ 00

& 00

_ 010

2008_2009 37

9 897 414 286 159 460 1 265 2009_2010 34 988 346 452 125 112 524 1 281

Ri �

� � � S� � �

�

L

y¶

Fi� � � �

v

� � �

� t

t�

�

SAE

/

AR/�

SE Wi�

t � i� � 2009_2010



13

- flooding of certain perimeters due to high precipitation, causing damages to the

vegetative development and fruiting of the rice crop- difficulties in evacuating water at the end of the crop-cycle

- difficulties in accessing CNCAS credit (more than 80% of cultivated area is financed byMutual Funds) causing non-respect of the recommended technical itinerary :

y Nearly 50% of the area is sown in August and 17% after the 10th of september

y Certified seeds are3 sown in only 20% of the areay More or less generalised sowing of the Sahel 108 (short cycle) variety instead of

medium cycle varieties

y The non respect of fractionation of urea

III. CROP-YEAR COLD DRY SEASON 2009_2010.

This concerns, in addition to market-gardening, mainly industrial Tomato and Ognon.

III.1. Financing production in the CDS 2009_2010

Financing the crop-year Cold Dry Season 2009_2010 concerned only industrial tomato for a total

outlay of 1,734 billion CFA, corresponding to an area of 2,676 hectares. Out of this outlay, theutilized sum is 1,424,956,729 F CFA as against 1,416,945,912 F CFA in the crop-year CDS 2008_2009, i.e., an augmentation of less than 1%.

Table 9 : Results of CNCAS credit Commitee for the CDS 2009_2010

BUREAUX

PROPOSED PROGRAMMES ACCEPTED PROGRAMMES ACHIEVEDPROGRAMME

(FCFA)

Number Area (ha) Outlay (F CFA)

Number Area (ha) Outlay(F CFA)

SAINT_LOUIS 29 327 290 242 480 29 217 146 294 583 55 303 529

RICHARD_ TOLL 107 1 382 1 142 277 394 101 1 239 813 737 836 702 192 738

TOTAL DAGANA 136 1 709 1 432 519 874 130 1 456 960 032 419 757 496 267

NDIOUM 164 1 258 954 200 498 164 1 220 774 342 659 667 460 462

TOTALPODOR 164 1 258 954 200 498 164 1 220 774 342 659 667 460 462VALLEE CDS 09/10 300 2 966 2 386 720 372 294 2 676 1 734 375 078 1 424 956 729

VALLE CDS 08/09 243 2 362 1 548 593 857 230 1990 1 373 891 856 1 416 945 912

Variation 57 604 838 126 515 64 686 360 483 222 8 010 817

III.2. Previsions of value addition and achievements for the CDS 2009_2010

To mato , o gnon an d co r n do min ate with 30%, 29% an d 17% o f value addition , respectively.

Table 10 : Previsions of value addition and achievements for the CDS 2009_2010 (ha)

Pr o duce Prevision s Achievemen ts (ha) Level o f

(ha) Dagan a Po do r Matam Bakel Valley achievemen t

To mato 4 315 1 905 1 193 5 3 103 72%

Ognon 4 145 965 2 048 127 95 3 235 78%

Co r n 2 415 310 274 558 42 1 184 49%

Sweet po tato 1 530 1 428 1 428 93%

Lady·s Fin ger 540 90 523 14 11 638 118%

5 Others[1] 1 545 717 441 74 188 1 420 92%

Total 14 490 5 415 4 479 778 336 11 008 76%



14

CDS . 2008 _ 09 18 270 4 755 4 871 1 119 337 11 082 6 1%

The cultivated area in Dry Cold Season 2008_2009, for the same period, was 11,082 ha as against11,008 ha this crop-year . Seedling and replanting operations are over, but the survey of the sownarea continues.

While waiting for the final results of the survey of the sown area, the awaited provisional

production of essential produce is as follows :

Table 11 : Previsions of Production in CDS 2009_2010 (ha) : provisional situation

DelegationsTomato Ognon Corn Sweet Potato

sup cul

(ha)

Production

(T)

sup cul

(ha)

Production

(T)

sup cul

(ha)

Production

(T)

sup cul

(ha)

Production

(T)

Dagana 1 905 57 150 965 23 643 310 1 085 1 428 28 560

Podor 1 193 35 790 2 048 47 104 274 959 0 0

atam 5 75 127 2 210 558 1953 0 0

Bakel 0 0 95 1 839 42 147 0 0

Total CDS 09_10 3 103 93 015 3 235 74 796 1 184 4 144 1 428 28 560

Total CDS 08_09 2510 76 455 3368 89869 1634 5720 1309 26 180Variation 593 16 560 -133 -15 074 -450 -1 576 119 2 380

III.3. Commercialisation of ognon 2009_2010

In the context of launching of marketing of ognon in the Senegal River Valley, a workshop to start themarketing crop-year 2009_2010 was held on monday 15 February 2010 at the SAED station at Nianga. Thesuggested prix for this crop-year is presented as follows :

$ Farm gate : 145 F CFA per kg ;$ Processed in Dakar : 185 F CFA per kg.

A monitoring committee, for the respect of prices, shgall be put in place at the level of sales centers.

The price of ognon in the last few years is presented in the following table : Table 1212 : Evolution in the price of ognon in the Senegal River Valley (F CFA/kg).

Crop-years Suggestedfarm-gate

price

SuggestedDakar processed

price

Observedfarm-gate

price

ObservedDakar processed

price

2005_2006 115 - 150 170 115 - 150 175 -3502006_2007 130 150 75 - 115 160 - 4002007_2008 135 175 120 -150 175 - 400

2008_2009 140 180 80 - 140 150 - 375 2009_2010 145 185



15

IV. SYNOPSIS OF VALUE ADDITION IN GOANA 2ND YEAR

IV.1 Cultivated area

Tabl � �

�

C � lti� at �

area i GOAN A II and compar i on wit

result s in GOAN A I (ha)

PRODUCE DELEGATIONS VALLEY

Dagana Podor Matam BakelRice 41 656 11 313 4 9 5 2 5 9 1

Corn 310 355 6 8 194 1 53 Sorghum 0 49 182 199 430

Tomato 1 810 1 193 5 0 3 008

Ognon 891 2 050 128 95 3 164Lady·s Finger 9 943 1 28 1 139

Groundnut 86 58 5 46 9 6

Sweet potato 1 313 0 0 0 1 313

Watermelon 0 11 1 19

Cassava 199 3 2 4 208

Others 1 64 1 2 6 243 3 8 3 660

TOTAL GOANA II 48 90 1 251 6 289 9 8 3 426

TOTAL GOANA I 41 544 16 896 5 942 1 106 65 48

F i ure 7 : C ompar ison of t ot al area culti at ed in GOAN A I and GOAN A II (ha)

F i ure 8 : C ompar ison of culti at ed area (ha) f or RI C

(GOAN A I and GOAN A II)

Compared to achievements in GOANA1 , an augmentation of the order of 10 % can be noted in the sownarea in GOANA2 . The sown area thus goes up from 65,48 ha to 3,426 ha between the two crop-years.The area has globally increased in all Delegations with the exception of that of Bakel which representsonly 1 % of sown area.

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

Dagana Podor Matam Bake

Vallée

41,544

16,8 ª 65,942

1,106

65,487

48,907

17,2516,289

978

73,426

SUP TOTAL GOANA I

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Dagana Podor Matam Bakel Vallée

34,889

10,9664,562

51

50,469

41,656

11,313

4,975

27

57,971

GOANA I RIZ GOANA II RIZ



16

IV.2 Value-addition of production in GOANA II

Table 14 : Value addition of production in GOANA II

ProduceValue of production (Billion F CFA) Expenses (Billion FCFA) Margins (Billion FCFA)

Win 09/10 CDS 09/10 HDS 09 Total Win 09/10 CDS 09/10 HDS 09 Total Win 09/10 CDS 09/10 HDS 09 Total

Rice 27,69 20,43 48,13 10,92 7,06 17,99 16,77 13,37 30,14

Corn 0,13 0,44 0,58 0,10 0,34 0,44 0,03 0,11 0,14

Sorghum 0,13 0,00 0,13 0,12 0,12 0,01 0,01

Tomato 5,37 5,37 1,16 1,16 4,21 4,21

Ognon 11,68 11,68 2,74 2,74 8,94 8,94

Sweet potato 4,92 4,92 0,70 0,70 4,22 4,22

Groundnut 0,48 0,00 0,40 0,88 0,21 0,00 0,18 0,39 0,26 0,00 0,22 0,49

Market-gardening

1,85 2,48 1,53 5,86 0,41 0,54 0,33 1,28 1,45 1,93 1,20 4,58

Total 30,29 24,90 22,37 77,55 11,76 5,48 7,58 24,83 18,52 19,41 14,79 52,73

V. PREVISIONS OF VALUE ADDITION AND REQUIREMENTS OF INPUTS IN GOANA III PROGRAMME

V.1 The Previsions of value addition

Table 15 : Previsions of value addition in GOANA III (ha)

Sectors

Produce Expected area Yields Production Annual

area

Annual

Production

( ha ) ( T/ha ) ( T ) ( ha ) ( T )

Crop years HIV CDS H DS HIV CDS H DS HIV CDS H DS

Year 2010

Implant

ed Rice 51 386 29 936 6,00 6,50 308 316 194 584 81 322 502 900

Tomato 4 810 42,00 202 020 4810 202 020Corn 2 600 2 755 3,00 3,50 7 800 9 643 5 355 17 443

Sorghum 480 3,00 1 440 480 1 440

Ognon 4 740 30,00 142 200 4 740 142 200

Emerging

Lady·s

Finger605 625 1 455 9,00 9,00 9,00 5 445 5 625 13 095 2 685 24 165

Cassava 1 500 30,00 45 000 1 500 45 000

Sweet

potato1 595 225 25,00 18,50 39 875 4 163 1 820 44 038

Groundnut 210 675 3,00 3,50 630 2 363 885 2 993

Being introduced and

others1 365 1 605 775 3 745

Total year 2 58 146 16 130 33 066 107 342

NB : HDS : Hot Dry Season ; HIV : Wintering ; CDS : Dry Cold Season

These objectives have been estimated on the basis of analysis of results of value addition of preceding years and by taking into account additional area expected to be covered under the

projets and programmes for which financing is being put in place.

V.2 Requirement of inputs

The requirements of inputs are calculated on the basis of doses recommanded per hectare for each cultivated produce.



17

Table 1 6 : Dose per hectare of inputs util zed in the river S enegal V alley

Prod.

Fertilizers

Urea 18-46-00 Phosphates of Matam

9-23-30 15-15-15 or 10-10-20 KCL

(Kg) (Kg) (Kg) (Kg) (Kg)

Lady¶s Finger 250 100 250

Ognon 120 150 250 200 200

corn 150 200

Tomato 250 1 250

Sweet potato 1 500

Groundnut 60 100 250 150

R ice Win 300 100 250

R ice CSC 350 100 250

T able 17: F ertili zer requirements GOANA III

Rice

HIV

Rice

CSCTomato Ognon Corn Sorghum Groundnut

Sweet

potato

Ladys

FingerTOTAL

Urea (T) 15 416 10 478 1 203 569 803 72 53 0 671 29 264

In

option

18-46-00 (T) 5 139 2 994 0 711 0 89 0 269 9 200

Phos Mat (T) 12 847 7 484 1 185 221 671 22 4089-23-30 (T) 0 0 6 013 0 0 0 0 0 6 013

15-15-15 ou 10-10-20

(T) 0 0 0 948 1 071 96 0 2 730 0 4 845

KCL (T) 0 0 0 948 0 133 0 0 1 081

TOTAL 33 401 20 955 7 215 4 361 1 874 168 496 2 730 1 611 72 811



18

7. CONCLUSION

Ultimately, for GOANA II, an increase in agricultural production can be observed in the SenegalRiver Valley. Indeed, while awaiting the conclusion of the final operations (survey of yields in thewintering, onset of the CDS), an augmentation of cultivated area can be observed across allsectors (mainly rice and tomato).

At the end of the crop-years Hot Dry Season 2009 and wintering 2009_10 for rice, which is theprincipal crop, global production is estimated to be 352 541 tonnes of paddy, representing

around a little more than 220 000 tonnes of polished rice for the domestic market.

It is understood that in order to attain the objectives fixed for 2012, the tendency shall have to bemaintained, in particular with respect to:

- Completing the entire AHA rehabilitation programme,- Completely equipping the OP in pumping material, both for tillage and harvesting- Continuing the subsidy on agricultural inputs,

- Initiating protection of those crops that compete with direct imports,- Maintaining vigilance on crop-protection, in particular anti-avian measures,

- Increasing the competivity of productiomn, with the aim of reducing the costs toconsumers ;- putting in place a reliable and secure system to market agricultural produce.

NOTE ON THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOANA II

Documents

Transcript of NOTE ON THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOANA II