North American Results of Talent Survey
-
Upload
thesupplychainniche -
Category
Business
-
view
521 -
download
0
description
Transcript of North American Results of Talent Survey
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 1
Supply Chain Talent ResearchSurvey ResultsFinal – North America
August 11, 2008
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 2
Scope of Work Review
Survey Results
• Demographic Data
• Skills
• Universities
Agenda
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 3
Underlying Issue and Focus of Work
Many organizations are concerned about the lack of sufficient as well as trained supply chain talent. It is believed that industry or academia alone cannot independently solve the issue of establishing the functional standards or creating key cross university partnerships focused on teaching critical supply chain skills.
Scope of Work Commissioned
The Global Supply Chain Professional Development Committee commissioned AMR to develop, conduct and analyze a cross industry survey intended to highlight current organizational priorities, gaps, and opportunities for industry and academia to consider towards clarifying the requisite skills and competencies needed in educating a supply chain professional
Work Conducted per Commission
Survey jointly developed with committee
Survey jointly advertised and promoted by the extended team through AMR client lists as well as the SCC, SCMR, CSCMP, CGT and other avenues
Survey managed by AMR with 287 completed surveys collected via our 3rd party Vendor
Survey data cleansed, aggregated and analyzed
Presentation deck with graphics and tables developed for distribution
Project Overview
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 4
1. Geography of Respondents
2. Industry Breakdown
3. Company Characteristics
4. Job Function
5. Job Level of Respondents
6. Span of Influence
7. Historical Hiring
Demographic Data
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 5
Geography – Total Market
North America74%
Other4%
Oceania1%
Western Europe13%
Asia Pacific (including India, China, Japan)
5%
Latin America (Central/South
America & Caribbean)
1%
Africa / Middle East2%
Region LocatedRegion Located
S2. In which region of the world are you currently located? N=287
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 6
Industry Breakdown – North America
212 completed surveys
8.5%
2.8%
3.8%
4.7%
5.2%
6.1%
6.1%
8.5%
9.0%
11.3%
12.7%
21.2%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Other
Wholesale
Automotive
Consulting svces/BPO
Chemicals
Industrial Mfg
Life Sciences & Pharma Mfg
Transportation
Retail
Aerospace & Defense
High Tech & Consumer Electronics
Food & CPG
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 7
Total Revenue Total Employees
Company Characteristics
17%
6%
5%
20%
18%
34%
Less than $250 million
$250 - $499.9 million
$500 million - $999.9 million
$1 billion - $4.9 billion
$5 billion - $9.9 billion
$10 billion or more
12%
9%
9%
8%26%
26%
Fewer than 100100 - 9991,000 - 2,4992,500 - 4,999
5,000 - 9,99910,000 - 49,99950,000 or more
S4. For classification purposes, approximately what was you company’s annual revenue for 2007?
S3. Approximately how many full-time equivalent (FTE) employees are there in your entire organization, including all branches, divisions, and subsidiaries?
N=212
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 8
Job Function
Supply chain planning
30%
Logistics21%
Operations / manufacturing
9%
Sourcing / purchasing
5%
Other30%
Human Resources
5%
Other Job Functions
• IT (4.7%)
• Exec. Mgmt (3.3%)
• Sales / Bus. Dev. (3.8%)
• Other Mfg (2.8%)
• Consulting (1.4%)
• Supply Chain Management (End-to-end (1.4%)
• Other (13.7%)
S5. What is your role or job function?
N=212
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 9
C-Level8%
SVP/GM8%
VP21%
Dir./Sr. Director38%
Mgr/Sr. Manager19%
Other5%
Consultant1%
Job Level
S6. What is your job title?
N=212
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 10
9%
38%
41%
12%
Solely responsible for decision
Leader of a group responsible
Member of a group responsible
Otherwise participate/provide advice
33%
18%20%
13%
16%
Enterprise-wide worldwide
Enterprise-wide country level
Subsidiaries/divisions
Sites or locations
Dept./work groups
How Participate in Hiring DecisionHow Participate in Hiring Decision Span of InfluenceSpan of Influence
Span of Influence
S7. Which of the following statements best describes your level of involvement in your company’s strategy for hiring supply chain management professionals?
S8. Which of the following best describes your span of influence within your organization with respect for hiring supply chain management professionals?
N=212
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 11
Historical Hiring
How Many HiredHow Many Hired
No8%
Yes92%
16%
25%
17%
15%
7%
9%
11%1-2 employees
3-5 employees
6-10 employees
11-20 employees
21-50 employees
51-99 employees
100 or moreemployees
S9a. Has you company hired supply chain management professionals in the last 3 years?
S9b. And how many have you hired?
N=196N=212
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 12
1. Projected Supply Chain Design
2. Span of Control versus Performance (using Model Framework)
3. Critical Skills Priorities Now and in 2010
4. Skills Desired versus Availability
5. Level of Competency Desired
6. Skills Available from the Current Talent Pool
Skills Section
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 13
Projected Supply Chain Organizational Design
40%46%
24%
28%
20%
17% 16%
10%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Now 2010
We do not have an existing governance body/specific policies in place
Decentralized mgmt w/autonomous SC processes by region or by facility
Central management with regional Supply Chain processes
Central management with common Supply Chain processes
Projected Organizational Design
Q16a. Which statement represents your company’s manufacturing governance structure now?
Q16b. Which will likely best represent your company’s manufacturing governance structure in 2010?
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 14
Major Stations of Attribute Model Defined
Element Element Definition
New Product Design and
Implementation
Functional Processes which focus on new product and service innovation that span research and
development as well as cross functional implementation
Plan Functional Processes that balance aggregate demand and supply to develop a course of action which best
meet sourcing, production and delivery requirements
Source Functional Processes that procure goods and services to meet planned or actual demand
Make Functional Processes that transform products to a finished state to meet planned or actual demand
Deliver Functional Processes that provide finished goods and services to meet planned or actual demand, typically
including order management, transportation management, and distribution management
(Post sales) Support Functional Processes associated with supporting consumer post purchase activities that include
maintenance, repair, inquiry, or returning products
Customer Management Functional Processes that support understanding, partnership and creation of value between the extended
supply chain and the customer
Technology Enablement Enabling Evaluation, selection, implementation and maintenance of critical technologies that facilitate the
achievement of each key facet of the value chain
Strategy and Change
Management
Enabling Activities and leadership that provide supply chain vision and support key changes necessary to
achieve long term business plan objectives
Performance
Measurement and
Analytics
Enabling Structure and processes that inform support and identify if key activities meet business plan
objectives or if corrective action is required. Activities that support deep business intelligence and
allow the ability to identify and capitalize on trends
Governance Enabling Organizational structure and processes that establish standard data elements, common operating
and reporting practices that ensure supply chain consistency, stability, and ethical practices
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 15
Span of Control and Performance: Using Model Framework
79%71% 69% 69% 67%
50%45% 44%
34%28% 27%
8.9 8.8
8.0 7.88.3
8.68.1
7.58.0
8.5
7.67.6
6.5 6.7 6.66.9
7.4 7.2
6.5
7.2
6.5
7.4
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
140.00%
160.00%
180.00%
200.00%
Deliv
erPla
n
Strat.
& Chan
ge M
gmt
Perf.
Mea
s. &
Anal
ytic
s
Sourc
e
Cust.
Mgm
t
Mak
e
Techn
. Ena
blem
ent
Govern
ance
New P
roduct
Support
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10ProcessesResponsible For(%) (N=212)
Importance ofProcess (MeanRating*)
Performance ofCompany (MeanRating*)
Q1. Which of the following processes is your supply chain organization at your company responsible for?
Q2a. Please rate the importance of the following SC processes to your company on a 1 to 10 scale where 1=not important at all and 10=extremely important.
Q2b. Please rate your company’s performance on each of these on a 1 to 10 scale where 1=We do not perform well at all and 10=We perform extremely well.
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 16
Critical Skills Priorities: Now and in 2010
10%
14%
22%
20%
30%
32%
39%
42%
46%
50%
47%
11%
13%
19%
20%
29%
31%
38%
40%
38%
40%
50%
Support
Governance
Make
New Product
Techn. Enablement
Cust. Mgmt
Perf. Meas. & Analytics
Source
Deliver
Strat. & Change Mgmt
Plan
Now (N=190)
2010 (N=172)
Q4a. In which of the following process areas do you currently have a critical need for SC talent?
Q4b. And in which areas do you anticipate your company will have a critical need for SC talent in 2010?
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 17
Skills Sought vs Available
Skills Sought
Ski
lls A
vaila
ble
Leadership/StrategicBasic
Has ALL the skills
Has VERY FEW of the skills
Post Sales Support
Governance
MakeCustomer Mgmt
Performance Measurement & Analytics
New Product
Technology Enablement
Source
PlanDeliver
Strategy & Change Mgmt
Quality of Skills
Level of Competency Desired vs. AvailableLevel of Competency Desired vs. Available
Intermediate Advanced
Has
SO
ME
o
f th
e sk
ills
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 18
Quality of Skills
6%
14%
14%
15%
16%
17%
18%
28%
29%
29%
39%
18%
33%
35%
45%
46%
42%
38%
54%
31%
42%
50%
55%
57%
90%
59%
69%
64%
71%
59%
50%
61%
50%
64%
29%
37%
31%
39%
39%
32%
34%
52%
36%
28%
Strategy & Change Mgmt
Governance
Techn. Enablement
Perf. Measur. & Analytics
Plan
Source
New Product
Deliver
Customer Mgmt
Make
Post Sales Support
Basic skills Intermediate Skills Advanced / Expert Skills Leadership / Strategic Skills
Level of Competency DesiredLevel of Competency Desired
Q6. For each SC process area, please indicate which level of competency(ies), if any, you are seeking to fulfill.
(Asked only for areas for which have a critical need for SC talent now)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 19
Quality of Skills
4%
8%
8%
10%
11%
11%
21%
25%
71%
65%
88%
78%
81%
83%
84%
61%
82%
69%
63%
29%
35%
9%
17%
12%
8%
6%
29%
8%
10%
13%
3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Post Sales Support
Governance
Make
Techn. Enablement
Customer Mgmt
Plan
Source
Strategy & Change Mgmt
Deliver
Perf. Measur. & Analytics
New Product
Has ALL the skills Has SOME of the skills Has VERY FEW of the skills
Skills Available From The Talent PoolSkills Available From The Talent Pool
Q8c. You indicated that you reach out to Universities or colleges in search of new supply chain talent. For each of the following processes, please select the level of skills available from the talent pool offered.
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 20
1. Primary Sources of Recruitment
2. Supply Chain Stations Recruited
3. Regions Recruited From
4. Most Frequently Recruited Programs North America
5. Where Industry goes for SC Talent in North America by Station
6. Level Hired
7. Key Competency Station and Attributes
University Section
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 21
Primary Sources for Recruitment
25%
30%
40%
38%
37%
49%
47%
48%
53%
54%
55%
55%
32%
37%
11%
47%
45%
40%
26%
29%
42%
34%
25%
26%
26%
16%
40%
32%
35%
28%
23%
35%
29%
23%
30%
22%
38%
17%
14%
26%
25%
26%
17%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160%
Strategy & Change Mgmt
Governance
Customer Mgmt
Post Sales Support
Technology Enablement
Source
New Product
Perf. Measur. & Analytics
Make
Plan
Deliver
Universities/Colleges
Executive Recruiters
Assoc./Prof. Org.
Not currently seekingnew talent
Channels for Recruiting Supply Chain TalentChannels for Recruiting Supply Chain Talent
Q8a. For each supply chain process area below, please indicate where you go for new talent.(Multiple responses allowed)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 22
5.9%
6.6%
12.5%
13.2%
13.2%
14.0%
25.0%
33.1%
33.8%
39.7%
44.9%
49.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Governance
Post Sales Support
New Product Design, Development and Launch
Customer Management
Technology Enablement
Strategy and Change Management
Make
Source
Performance Measurement and Analytics
Plan
Deliver
NO Particular Specialty
Supply Chain Specialty Areas Recruited For At N.A. Universities
Specialty Areas SoughtSpecialty Areas Sought
For each University you identified, please indicate which of the processes or specialties you recruit for.N=136
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 23
Regions Industry Recruits From
AP/Oceania/Africa/M. East
12%
Europe13%
Latin/S./Central America
7%
North America68%
Multiple responses allowed and percentages are based on total number of responses, not respondents.
Q9. In which of the following regions do you reach out to universities or colleges in search of new SC talent for ANY of your SC process areas? (Multiple responses allowed)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 24
Most Frequently Recruited Programs for SC Talent in N. America
Industry Popularity for SC Talent: Top Tier
31.1%27.5%
16.8% 15.6% 16.2%
12.6% 13.8%
10.2% 10.8%
6.6% 5.4% 5.4% 4.2% 4.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Mic
hig
an
Sta
te U
n.
Pe
nn
Sta
te
Oh
io S
tate
Un
.
Ge
org
ia T
ec
h
Un
. of
Te
nn
es
se
e
MIT
Ari
zon
a S
tate
Un
.
Un
. of
Mic
hig
an
- A
nn
Arb
or
Pu
rdu
e U
n.
Sta
nfo
rd U
n.
Te
xa
s A
&M
Un
ive
rsit
y
Un
. of
Wis
co
ns
in -
Ma
dis
on
Un
. of
Ma
ryla
nd
Le
hig
h U
niv
ers
ity
N=167Q10-14. Please indicate which universities or educational institutions you reach out to in [region]. Select up to 5 educational institutions within each region using the pull-down lists
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 25
Industry Popularity for SC Talent: Second Tier
3.6% 3.6%
3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
Ca
rne
gie
Me
llon
Un
.
Un
. of
Wa
sh
ing
ton
Au
bu
rn U
n.
Ru
tge
rs U
n.
No
rth
ea
ste
rn U
n.
Ce
ntr
al M
ich
iga
n U
n.
Un
. of
To
ron
to
Un
. of
Ca
lifo
rnia
, Be
rke
ley
Iow
a S
tate
Un
.
Ge
org
ia S
ou
the
rn U
n.
Ind
ian
a U
n.
Un
. of
Min
ne
so
ta -
Tw
inC
itie
s
Un
. of
No
rth
Ca
rolin
a
Most Frequently Recruited Programs for SC Talent in N. America
N=167Q10-14. Please indicate which universities or educational institutions you reach out to in [region]. Select up to 5 educational institutions within each region using the pull-down lists
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 26
Supply Chain Specialty Area Recruited For, By University
Stations
recruited for:
NPD &
Launch
Plan Source Make Deliver Customer
Mgmt
Post
Sales
Support
N
Total 13% 40% 33% 25% 45% 13% 7% 135
Michigan State 14% 57% 43% 31% 47% 10% 8% 49
Penn State 8% 47% 40% 32% 58% 8% 3% 38
Ohio State 15% 44% 33% 37% 63% 15% 11% 27
Un. Of Tenn. 4% 54% 33% 25% 71% 21% 0% 24
Georgia Tech. 13% 39% 17% 30% 39% 17% 9% 23
MIT 19% 33% 24% 19% 33% 10% 5% 21
40%+
30% - 39%
20% - 29%
10% - 19%
Specialty Areas - FunctionalSpecialty Areas - Functional
Q10-14. For each educational institution identified, please indicate which of the processes or specialties you recruit for
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 27
Supply Chain Specialty Area Recruited For, By University
Stations
recruited for:
Governance Strategy &
Change Mgmt
Technology
Enablement
Performance
Measurement &
Analytics
N
Total 6% 14% 13% 33% 135
Michigan State 10% 14% 20% 37% 49
Penn State 5% 11% 5% 40% 38
Ohio State 4% 7% 11% 30% 27
Un. Of Tenn. 4% 17% 13% 46% 24
Georgia Tech. 4% 22% 13% 48% 23
MIT 5% 14% 14% 33% 21
Specialty Areas - EnablersSpecialty Areas - Enablers
Q10-14. For each educational institution identified, please indicate which of the processes or specialties you recruit for
40%+
30% - 39%
20% - 29%
10% - 19%
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 28
Recruits Hired by Level
43.0%
23.5%
67.1%
0% 25% 50% 75%
Undergraduate
Graduate
Both Undergraduates & Graduate
Q10b, Q11b, Q12b, Q13b. For each University you indicated in [region], please indicate whether you go to that educational institution or college for undergraduate talent, graduate talent, or both.
48.5%
18.9%
56.8%
0% 25% 50% 75%
Undergraduate
Graduate
Both Undergraduates & Graduate
All Regions (N=149)All Regions (N=149)
In North America (N=132)In North America (N=132)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 29
Key Competency Stations and Attributes
1. Transportation, Strategic & Operational (76%)2. Logistics Planning and Control (73%)3. Warehousing, Strategic and Operational (56%)4. Delivery Management (56%)5. Inventory Management and Control (55%)6. Third Party or Outsource Management (42%)
No.1
Deliver
79% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=66)
Q15. For each of the following attributes within the [process area], please indicate where specifically you have a need for SC talent (Multiple responses allowed)
1. Demand Management (88%)2. Inventory Planning and Optimization (84%)3. Sales and Operations Planning (67%)4. Modeling, “What-If” Scenarios (62%)5. Capacity Management (55%)6. Product Portfolio Analysis (34%)7. New Product Management (34%)8. Service Offering Development (20%)
No.2
Plan
71% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=86)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 30
Key Competency Stations and Attributes
1. Development of Dashboards (77%)2. Hierarchy of Performance Measures (65%)3. Presentation and Reporting (59%)4. Ad hoc analysis (56%)5. Exception Management (50%)6. Trade-off Management (38%)
No.3
Performance Measurement and Analytics
69% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=66)
Q15. For each of the following attributes within the [process area], please indicate where specifically you have a need for SC talent (Multiple responses allowed)
No.4
Strategy and Change Management
69% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=69)
1. Best Practice Analysis and Benchmarking (68%)2. Change Management Techniques (62%)3. Global Manufacturing and Distribution (57%)4. Management Dashboards & Metrics (57%) 5. Lifecycle Management Strategy (52%)6. Business Process Design and Vision (50%)7. Process Integration (49%)8. Globalization (48%)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 31
Key Competency Stations and Attributes
Q15. For each of the following attributes within the [process area], please indicate where specifically you have a need for SC talent (Multiple responses allowed)
No.6
Customer Management
50% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=53)
1. Order Management (62%)2. Relationship Management (60%)3. CPFR/VMI (47%)4. Customer Service(45%)5. Collaboration Techniques (42%)6. Negotiation Strategies (42%)7. Sales and Distribution Interface (40%)8. Joint Value Creation (40%)
1. Sourcing Strategies & Plans (71%)2. Supplier Selection & Development (71%)3. Total Cost Analysis (62%)4. Supplier Collaboration (60%)5. Relationship Management (60%)6. Negotiation & Contracting (60%)7. Risk Management (50%)8. Needs Assessment (37%)9. Order Management & Conflict Resolution (37%)
No.5
Source
67% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=68)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 32
Key Competency Stations and Attributes
No.7
Make
45% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=33)
1. Materials Management (79%)2. Production and Inventory Control(73%)3. Master Production Scheduling (70%)4. Quality Management (58%)5. Process Control (55%)6. Product Conversion (55%)
Q15. For each of the following attributes within the [process area], please indicate where specifically you have a need for SC talent (Multiple responses allowed)
No.8
Technology Enablement
44% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=50)
1. Planning & Execution Systems Management Selection & Implementation (74%)
2. New Technology Adoption (62%)3. Enterprise Resource Planning System Management (60%)4. Statistical Analysis Tool (58%)5. EDI (50%)6. IT Communications with Suppliers & Customers (48%)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 33
Key Competency Stations and Attributes
No.9
Governance
34% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=22)
1. Organizational Planning (64%)2. Business Controls (64%)3. Risk Management (64%)4. Training (64%)5. Social Responsibility (46%)6. Federal, Governmental Controls (36%)7. Intellectual Property (32%)
No.10
New Product
28% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=35)
1. New Product Design Planning & Logistics Execution (Workflow) (66%)
2. Demand & Capacity Planning (63%)3. Cross Functional Coordination with Ongoing Sales &
Operations (64%)4. Make Versus Buy Sourcing Decisions (37%)5. Network Design (34%)6. Postponement Strategies (31%)7. Service Offerings (17%)
Q15. For each of the following attributes within the [process area], please indicate where specifically you have a need for SC talent (Multiple responses allowed)
© 2008 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 34
Key Competency Stations and Attributes
No.11
Post Sales Support
27% Of all respondents had this station in their
Supply Chain span of control
Attributes and Interest Level (N=25)
1. Reverse Logistics (Returns Management (56%)2. Service Parts Management – Predictive Modeling (39%)3. Technical Service Support (39%)4. End of Life Management (33%)5. Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (28%)6. Warranty Management (17%)
Q15. For each of the following attributes within the [process area], please indicate where specifically you have a need for SC talent (Multiple responses allowed)