Noise Exposures in an Ethiopian Integrated Textile Mill Exposures in an Ethiopian Integrated Textile...
Transcript of Noise Exposures in an Ethiopian Integrated Textile Mill Exposures in an Ethiopian Integrated Textile...
Noise Exposures in an Ethiopian Integrated Textile Mill
Chris Keil Environmental Health Program, Bowling Green State University
Solomon Yimer Working Conditions Inspection Department, Ethiopian Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs
Abera KumieCommunity Health Department, Addis Ababa University
Background - Ethiopia
• Under developed country in East Africa• 80% of workforce is in agricultural sector
• Most are subsistence farmers• Large proportion of what industry exists is tied to
agricultural sector• Leather• Livestock• Floriculture• Textiles
Background – Ethiopian OSH
• Legal structures for regulating OSH exist• Under-resourced• No specific regulations and procedures
• Need for economic development seen in tension with obligation to provide healthy and safe workplace
Background – Ethiopian OSH
• Almost no IH sampling equipment of any kind exists in the Country
• Virtually no exposure data of any kind• Some injury and fatality data• No data management system
Background - Project
• March 2005 AIHA International Development Fund sponsored a two-week Introduction to Occupational Hygiene course• MPH students• Ethiopian MOLSA inspection team members
• As part of course: Walkthrough of integrated textile facility• Negotiated use of dosimeters during walkthrough
and follow-up visits
Background – The Plant
• Adey Ababa Yarn, Share Co.• Integrated Textile Plant
• Baled cotton in• Finished garments out
• Founded 1961, Privatized in 1999, has since reverted to government ownership
• > 2,200 employees, 75% female
Research Question
• Do noise exposures in the facility present the risk of hearing loss to the employees• ACGIH criteria• OSHA criteria
Methods
• LD Spark 706 Dosimeters• Walkthrough
• Worn by students• Kept location log• Identify areas of potential high exposure
• Two Follow up visits• Partial shift personal and area monitoring• In areas identified during walkthrough
Walk through results
Walk through results
• High noise levels identified in • Blowing• Yarn making• Blanket making
• Blowing had very few employees• Follow up assessments were done for yarn
making and blanket making departments
Yarn Making – Day 1
Yarn Making – Day 2
Blanket Making – Day 1
Blanket Making – Day 2
Yarn Making Doses
2.444.189.184.5Etalemahu
10.560.116387.1Bizuayehu
34.077.427589.4Abaynesh
11.255.714586.7Birke
PELHCTLVLEQWorker
8 hour projected dose (%)
Blanket Making Doses
8.355.114486.7Ibrahim
9.049.912986.2Area
14.457.815286.9Area
5.248.212085.9Ibrahim
11013261992.9Mekuria
41.267.823088.7Asfaw
PELHCTLVLEQWorker
8 hour projected dose (%)
Assessment Summary
• Walkthrough dosimetry with location log was useful for identifying high risk areas
• In these two departments noise exposures are routinely over ACGIH TLVs
• OSHA action level routinely exceeded• PEL rarely exceeded• Observation and limited data suggests that older
blanket making equipment is louder
Control Options
• Source control• Balancing, maintenance, etc. on older machines
difficult due to lack of parts.• Expertise and materials lacking for other source
modifications including vibration reduction and dampening.
• Control between sources and workers• Specialized sound absorbing materials not readily
available
Control Options
• Personal protection• Availability of hearing protectors is very limited• What is available is very expensive
• Hearing health management• Audiometry essentially not available• Hearing aids not available
• Options are limited without external support
Conclusions
• In one factory a sizeable proportion of the employs are exposed to noise levels that put their hearing at risk.• The factory is considered typical by MOLSA
inspectors• Access to resources, both physical and human,
for the reduction of this risks is extremely limited• International development assistance should
include provisions for a healthy workforce.
Acknowledgements
• AIHA International Development fund• Adey Ababa management and workers• Ethiopian MOLSA Workplace Inspection unit• MPH students in the Department of Community
Health, Faculty of Medicine, Addis Ababa University