Ninth Grade DistributionAll Students 337 - 36 = 301 (100%)

(less level 1 & 2 students)

(less level 3 students in full transition)

(less students in full EEN Services)

Pod Students 79 (26.25%)

Non-Pod Students 222 (73.75%)

Distribution Comparison

All Students

M: 213 70.76%

2: 3 1.00%

3: 18 5.98%

4: 32 10.63%

5: 24 7.97%

6: 11 3.65%

Pod Students

M: 58 73.42%

2: 0 0%

3: 1 1.27%

4: 7 8.86%

5: 10 12.66%

6: 3 3.78%

Non-Pod Students

M: 155 69.82%

2: 3 1.35%

3: 17 7.66%

4: 25 11.26%

5: 14 6.31%

6: 8 3.60%

Distribution Comparison

All Students

M: 276 85.19%

LD: 23 7.10%

ED: 5 1.54%

OHI: 11 3.40%

I: 9 2.78%

Pod Students

M: 74 81.32%

LD: 6 6.59%

ED: 3 3.30%

OHI: 3 3.30%

I: 5 5.49%

Non-Pod Students

M: 202 86.70%

LD: 17 7.30%

ED: 2 .86%

OHI: 8 3.43%

I: 4 1.72%

Where do we go from here?Data Collection and Data Management• GPA• Class Rank (Mean, Median)• Referrals• Attendance• Tardy Rate• MAPS • Sophomore WKCE• Perception Data (parents, students,

staff)

Data Collection and Data Analysis

In addition to new data collection, we will also use past data as a comparison group.

• 2004-2005• 2005-2006• 2006-2007 Teaming Data of freshman

English and Afro-Asian teachers.• 2007-2008 Pod Data