Next Generation Planning - Affordable Living, Smart Growth ... · distribution, balance and role of...
Transcript of Next Generation Planning - Affordable Living, Smart Growth ... · distribution, balance and role of...
The guidelines
PART A
This part of the handbook provides guidelines for governments and industry about planning and delivering affordable and sustainable communities. They are arranged in a simple format – one issue at a time. The guidelines are informed by the research undertaken in the preparation of this handbook and include relevant examples.
The guidelines are ordered by scale as follows:
1.0 Sub-regional and district scale2.0 Neighbourhood (local) scale3.0 Street scale4.0 Lot and building scale.
The key sub-regional and district scale concept is the SEQ Place Model – a strategic planning tool that can also be a powerful communication tool to understand planning for an area.
Sub-regional and district scale
1.0
This part of the guidelines covers:
1.1 The SEQ Place Model1.2 Natural Places (P1)1.3 Rural Places (P2)1.4 Rural Townships (P3)1.5 Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4)1.6 Urban Neighbourhoods (P5)1.7 Centres of Activity (P6)1.8 CBDs (P7)1.9 Specific Use Places (P8)
9
The SEQ Place Model
The research underpinning this handbook suggests strongly that settlements in SEQ can be understood as a series of places, which have common characteristics, similar land use mixes and intensities of development. These range from natural areas, rural areas, rural towns, areas with predominantly suburban housing and more urban areas of significantly differing densities, through to mixed use activity centres and CBDs.
This handbook illustrates these place types together in the SEQ Place Model. It identifies a progression of much loved natural and human habitats in SEQ, recognisable by their function, special qualities, intensity, character and housing forms associated with each place type.
This SEQ Place Model is a handy way of thinking about, and planning for, a local government area, or a large scale planning project such as a major new greenfield community.
The model has potential application to urban growth areas and existing suburbs at the discretion of local governments. The model can help organise different parts of a local government area towards achieving similar strategic planning outcomes, and inform the distribution, balance and role of each place.
The SEQ Place Model drawing (above) provides a snapshot of the main characteristics. Each place type is further described in sections 1.2 to 1.9.
Natural Places (P1)
Rural Places (P2) Next Generation Suburba
Rural Townships (P3)
10
Part B of the handbook explains how the SEQ Place Model can be used in a planning scheme to:
- describe a menu of quality place types found across a local government area
- explain the recipe for creating each place type, such as the housing mix, scale and urban form that is characteristic of each place type
- provide the ingredients in the form of code provisions, zones and levels of assessment
Note: The SEQ Place Model shows a series of common, useful place types. Intensity of development is indicated, as is residential and non-residential uses and public transport. The form and intensity of place types are expected to overlap. The SEQ Place Model is an illustrative concept and does not show the non-linear corridors and special use places of cities, nor does it indicate a quantum for any place type. Further, depending on the strategic context of each local government area not all place types may be applicable.
an Neighbourhoods (P4) Centres Of Activity (P6)
Urban Neighbourhoods (P5) CBDs (P7)
11
Areas essentially untouched by human habitationNatural Places (P1)
Natural Places are areas dominated by the natural environment. They perform essential functions as green space, ecological and regional landscape areas which are vital to protecting our ecological assets and biodiversity, provide access to natural experiences and a landscape setting for their surroundings, including many towns and cities.
Typical examples include national parks and similar publicly owned, relatively undisturbed areas. Some privately owned land will have the same attributes.
In the SEQ Regional Plan, Natural Places are usually found in the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area, although natural features like rivers, beaches and bushland in urban areas can also be Natural Places.
Lookout at O’Reilly’s
12
The broad rural parts of the regionRural Places (P2)
Rural Places are mostly used for rural production, from less intense activities like cattle grazing, to more intensive cropping and animal husbandry. Some are used for forestry and carbon sequestration. Non-production functions such as small scale tourism and rural industries are also present.
These places are important for their rural production and contribute to the landscape setting of the region. Housing is mostly single dwellings on farm properties for those who live and usually work on the land. Some of these places are used for rural living, where people live on large lots but don’t use them for any substantial rural production.
While rural living is an element of rural places, this is secondary to rural production in smarter communities. Rural Places are predominantly in the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area of the SEQ Regional Plan, but are also found in the Urban Footprint (e.g. rural in nature but identified for urban development in the future) and Rural Living Area.
Sunshine Coast Hinterland – one of the rural places of the region
13
Small settlements surrounded by rural placesRural Townships (P3)
Rural Townships centre on a mixed use, low scale main street, usually with traditional awnings over the footpath. The mix of uses is often eclectic, with shops, halls, churches, schools, industry, a park and housing jumbled together, bound together by the character of the street and the buildings.
Rural Townships are characterised by a range of housing, predominantly detached on lots larger than found in suburban and urban neighbourhoods. Other types of housing in Rural Townships, such as duplexes and aged care facilities, cater for people in these areas as their housing needs change. Rural Townships have a range of local community facilities and services but rely on larger centres for higher order uses such as employment, hospitals, education and cultural facilities, universities and theatres, as well as major shopping centres.
They are, and should continue to be, based on a traditional grid street pattern, which give them a robust structure which is easy to navigate. Rural Townships with public transport, like railway towns, can have potential for further urban development. Urban expansion of these places would extend existing grid pattern to reflect the traditional character of the place.
Rosewood exemplifies rural townships
14
Characterised by walkability between a range of housing and a central focusNext Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4)
Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4) offer housing choice, from detached houses and duplexes to row houses, shop-top housing and even live/work buildings. While detached houses are most common, many detached houses are on smaller lots.
Attached housing in these neighbourhoods are often on lots with particular attributes, like corners, lots with rear lane access and locations close to open space, centres or public transport. Non-residential uses in P4 neighbourhoods meet the day-to-day needs of residents. Housing in these places is within easy walking and cycling distance to a wider range of facilities including shops, schools, parks and public transport. Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4) are generally low in scale and comprise well landscaped environments. These neighbourhoods provide 15–30 dwellings per hectare, as envisaged by the SEQ Regional Plan for significant greenfield areas.
P4 streets are characterised by street trees providing shade and character, and shared use by cars, bikes and pedestrians. They are usually grid-based, making it easy to find your way around.
P4 neighbourhoods are mostly located close to Urban Neighbourhoods (P5) and Centres of Activity (P6) where residents can readily access higher order services and facilities. They are always in the Urban Footprint in the SEQ Regional Plan. P4 neighbourhoods are different from many existing suburban areas common throughout SEQ and can be distinguished by their walkability, housing choice and access to public transport, jobs and services. Greenfield and existing areas identified by local governments for urban renewal are most likely to exhibit characteristics that make them suitable for P4 neighbourhoods. It is not expected or intended that all existing suburban areas will transition into P4 neighbourhoods.
North Ipswich exemplifies the next generation suburban neighbourhood
15
Higher density, walkable, mixed use neighbourhoodsUrban Neighbourhoods (P5)
Urban Neighbourhoods may be older suburbs closer to centres or parts of new communities that are planned to achieve this outcome from day one. They have good public transport access and have been developed or redeveloped over time at higher densities and with a greater mix of housing and uses than Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4).
Detached houses are found in these areas, but usually in small pockets and with a more urban setting. These neighbourhoods take different forms, from areas where medium density or low to medium scale buildings are dominant to higher density places with high rise buildings. Urban Neighbourhoods provide greater than 30 dwellings per hectare, and sometimes as many as 100 dwellings per hectare. They are often transit oriented. Higher density Urban Neighbourhoods usually have a number of Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4) nearby.
Urban Neighbourhoods are characterised by mixed use, providing ready access to a range of shopping, community and other local services and places of employment such as small to medium scale offices. Housing not in a mixed use setting is within easy walking and cycling distance to these other uses and public transport.
Urban Neighbourhoods have a sense of enclosure at the street level provided by small building setbacks, with the built form character usually dominant. Their streets are characterised by street trees, which provide shade and character, footpaths for walking and roadways shared by cars and bikes. They are usually grid based and connected in a way that make it easy to find your way around.Urban Neighbourhoods are always in the Urban Footprint in the SEQ Regional Plan and usually near Centres of Activity (P6), CBDs (P7) and Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4).
Urban renewal areas of Bulimba exemplifies Urban Neighbourhoods
16
Concentrations of non-residential activities at the focus of transport networksCentres of Activity (P6)
These centres have concentrations of non-residential activities like shopping but are also centres for employment, higher education and entertainment. They come in various scales, from local to district and regional, and are more varied in character than suburban and urban neighbourhoods. They are a focus of transport networks, and a hub for public transport and local pedestrian and cycling systems.
Centres of Activity also contain housing, usually apartments. They provide residents in and around the centres with ready access to the range of uses and employment they offer.
They have a strong sense of enclosure at the street level, with little or no building setback to the street. The man made part of its character is dominant, but punctuated by squares and urban parks.
Vibrancy flows from their mix of uses, particularly at the street level. They are important meeting places and focal points for their communities. Their streets are lined with mature trees, which provide shade and character, footpaths for walking trips and roadways shared by cars and bikes. They are usually grid-based and connected in a way that make it easy to find your way around. Regionally significant Centres of Activity are identified in the SEQ Regional Plan. Many more local, district and neighbourhood centres exist across the region.
South Bank exemplifies this place type
17
CBDs (P7)The centre and heart of a city
CBDs are the centres of cities. They are the biggest centres, with the widest range and greatest intensity of activity in the city. They are also the heart of a city, and usually the place that most people think of when it is mentioned. They are laid out in a grid, and at the centre of transport networks, for public transport, cycling and pedestrians.
They are urban environments. Buildings dominate the streets, although the streets are important elements of their character. Their large scale and intensity provides a vibrancy unlike any other part of the city. They are the key focal point for their communities, as places to work, do business, for entertainment or just to enjoy. They are meeting places, with squares and urban parks. CBDs are important to the economy of the city, both as centres of production and consumption.
Their streets are lined with street trees, have hard footpaths for walking trips, and roadways shared use by cars and bikes.
Toowoomba CBD
18
Limited use, often large places that do not fit into other place typesSpecific Use Places (P8)
These places are restricted to a small number of locations where a large single use or focus does not fit into other place types, and takes a quite different form to those other place types. In these places, housing usually has a very minor role, if at all.
Particular examples include places such as industry areas, ports, prisons and large sport and recreation facilities including stadiums. They are recognised as a different place, because their scale and nature mean they have a quite different form that does not integrate with the other place types in the SEQ Place Model.
The purpose of this place type is to recognise these particular places, rather than to encourage the continued use of single purpose zonings for places such as large shopping centres, which have the ability to be integrated into other place types.
The Port of Brisbane is a typical Specific Use Place
Neighbourhood (local) scale
2.0
The creation of walkable mixed use neighbourhoods, in contrast to sprawling, single use residential development, is fundamental to the more sustainable urban form which Next Generation Planning aims to achieve. This means each neighbourhood contains a mix of uses and housing types, organised with a street network, block size, and structure which is appropriate to its place type and maximises its walkability to its key focal points including public transport.
This part of the Guidelines covers:
2.1 Walkability2.2 Neighbourhood structure2.3 Block size 2.4 Street network2.5 Subtropical design2.6 Housing choice
21
A key attribute of Next Generation PlanningWalkability
The climate of SEQ is ideal for walking most times of the year. Walkability is a fundamentally important part of neighbourhood design.
Walking is encouraged and enhanced when there is something to walk to (destinations such as shops, jobs, public transport stops, community facilities, parks, open spaces or just neighbours), something to walk on (a footpath) and an easily understood direct route to get there.
Streets need to have appropriate shelter from the sun with street trees or awnings, and be overlooked by development with casual surveillance to improve safety. High fencing adjoining streets, parks and public spaces should be avoided as these create unattractive environments with little opportunity for passive surveillance.
Appropriate street network design makes walking easy with direct routes and memorable vistas, which might include distinctive buildings, parks, open spaces and distinct landmarks.
The design of Varsity Lakes town centre promotes walkability
22
Neighbourhood design is fundamental to sustainable, walkable urban formNeighbourhood structure
Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4) and Urban Neighbourhoods (P5) are designed for walkability using a five minute walking catchment (400 m) around a focal point or centre. This central focus is also a key part of neighbourhoods and can involve a mix of local shops and offices, and/or some community uses, such as library or primary school, and local parks. The mix of non-residential uses depends on the context. For many suburban locations, a small park and bus stop might be all that is expected, while many Urban Neighbourhoods (P5) demonstrate a wider range of amenities. Most parts of the neighbourhood are within a five minute walk of this central focus.
Note that in transit orientated development precincts, walking catchments of five, 10 or 15 minutes may be an appropriate structuring tool (Queensland Government, 2010e).
All housing is part of a neighbourhood and all neighbourhoods provide a variety of housing types, with the range and balance of this housing reflecting their place type in the SEQ Place Model (see 2.6).
The centre of the neighbourhood is located close to or adjacent to an existing (or planned) public transport routes, on the local through street network in accessible and visible locations. This street network connects to nearby centres and larger neighbourhood and town centres. These routes are also efficient public transport routes for buses, light or heavy rail.
Neighbourhood design respects natural landform and systems, including drainage. This means minimising cut and fill when designing streets and lots and integrating with the existing landscape.
Five minute walking catchments promote a more sustainable urban form
23
A basic tool of place buildingBlock size and structure
Block sizes are scaled to create a mix of lots that can accommodate development and housing of varying scales and intensities. Block sizes encourage walkability, but are not so small as to create more streets than needed as this impacts on affordability. Typical blocks are 2-3 times longer than their width; with lengths (in P3, P4, P5 places) between 160-200m and widths around 50-80m. This allows flexibility for a range of lot sizes to provide for a variety of housing which will vary according to place type. Centres of Activity (P6) and CBDs (P7) require a wider range of block dimensions to suit centre design. Streets surrounding blocks can be of differing functions, scales and traffic volumes, which allows each street to have different forms of development. Blocks closer to centres have higher intensity development with land use and built form transitions across rear boundaries.
Rear lanes are a feature of block size and structure. Blocks that front onto busier through streets that cannot have direct driveway access can have higher density development using rear lanes for vehicle access, with the housing still addressing the primary street frontage. These lanes can be used in appropriate locations, for example, opposite parks or centres, to create high quality streetscapes and to provide pedestrian safety and amenity through a consistent street rhythm not disturbed by driveways and car parking. Lanes also provide opportunities for different housing forms that aid affordability, such as row housing and ‘Fonzie flats’.
The ends and corners of blocks allow for more diverse and denser housing types as these sites have more street frontage and more opportunities for pedestrian and vehicle access. Streets along end blocks can be the busier ones that lead to centres. This also assists walkability and legibility.
The block sizes of North Ipswich provide for a range of lot sizes and housing diversity
24
Build modified grids fit for purpose, use laneways for walkability and amenityStreet Network
This study indicates street networks work best when they are interconnected, usually grid based, and respond to the existing regional street pattern and geometry, topography of the site, waterway corridors, significant vegetation and desired open spaces. Streets orientated close to north/south or east/west enable appropriate climate orientation of lots and buildings.
Streets are different, each with a function and scale to suit movement requirements and to accommodate different scales and forms of development. Busier streets can accommodate a greater variety and density of development.
The street network should provide direct and easily understood choices of routes to walk, cycle and drive to centres, public transport and other community destinations in the locality.
Fine grained street networks encourage active forms of transport, walking and cycling. Streets closer to centres are generally closer together to create a finer grain of smaller block sizes.
A detailed method for designing a street network is outlined in Complete Streets: Guidelines for urban street design (Institute for Public Works Engineering Australia, 2010).
An interconnected grid system provides direct routes for pedestrian, cyclists, public transport and cars
25
A defining characteristic of SEQSubtropical design
Subtropical Design in South East Queensland
A Handbook for Planners, Developers and Decision Makers
Sympathetic design for climate creates a more sustainable built form and lifestyles that require less energy use, and provides for more affordable living.
South East Queensland has a subtropical climate which has become a defining characteristic of design in the region, responding to the lifestyles of its inhabitants, while acknowledging the history and traditions of the place.
Subtropical design places importance on topographical features and natural drainage processes in determining the optimal pattern of development. In also includes design features such as good shelter and shade, indoor/outdoor living relationships, lightweight construction, prominent roof forms and overhangs, hoods on windows and design for sun and breezes with good orientation.
For more information, refer to Subtropical Design in South East Queensland – A Handbook for Planners, Developers, and Decision-makers, (Queensland University of Technology, 2010a).
26
Housing choice contributes to Affordable LivingHousing choice
Households in SEQ are becoming more diverse and generally smaller. More than half comprise only one or two people, while families with children remain a major group. Average household size has decreased from five in the early 1900s to 2.6 in 2006, and predicted to be 2.4 by 2031(Queensland Government, 2010g). This creates an increasing need for varying housing types and sizes.
At the same time, our houses have been getting larger, so that Australia has amongst the largest average dwelling sizes in the world (ABS, 2005). This disparity has exacerbated the affordability challenge. Smaller housing options in the marketplace can address this issue, and industry, government and consumer changes are needed to allow this to happen. There is a direct connection between providing a choice of housing and affordable housing. Variety in housing types attract a variety of household types with different incomes, social and cultural backgrounds and household sizes.
Providing a range of housing types in more places means that affordable living can be achieved more generally, rather than concentrated in a few places. It also means people can relocate in their existing community as their housing needs change. In later sections, this handbook identifies a range of housing types for SEQ including detached houses, secondary dwellings (such as granny and fonzie flats), small multiple dwellings (3-5 dwelling units), row houses, live/work dwellings, low rise, medium and high rise apartments. The diagram on the following page indicates how housing choice can be achieved across the SEQ Place Model. Many housing types have the added advantage of using land and materials more efficiently, allowing flexibility to adapt to the changing needs of households over time, including work from home arrangements.
Broadbeach offers a range of housing options
27
P2. RURAL PLACES P3.RURAL TOWNSHIPSP4. NEXT GENERATION
SUBURBAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
Ho
usi
ng
Typ
olo
gie
s
Detached houses on wide lots
Detached houses on
narrow lots
The “plexes” Duplexes/Triplexes/
Quadplexes/Quinplexes
Row House
Live/Work Building
Low Rise Apartment
Medium and High Rise
Apartment
28
P5. URBAN NEIGHBOURHOODS P6. CENTRES OF ACTIVITY P7. CBDs
Detached houses on wide lots
Ho
usin
g Typ
olo
gies
Detached houses on narrow lots
The “plexes” Duplexes/Triplexes/Quadplexes/Quinplexes
Row House
Live/Work Building
Low Rise Apartment
Medium and High Rise Apartment
Street Scale
3.0
Street function and design depends on its context in the SEQ Place Model and the neighbourhood. Streets are critical for movement, but have several other important functions too. These include access to properties, parking, utilities and services, biodiversity and most of all, placemaking. Depending on the context of an individual street, the priority of these functions will vary, and street design must respond appropriately.
This part of the guidelines covers:
3.1 Complete streets3.2 Neighbourhood streets3.3 Connector streets3.4 Rear lanes3.5 Intersections3.6 Pedestrian crossings3.7 Kerbs3.8 Shelter and shade3.9 On-street parking3.10 Water Sensitive Urban Design
31
Successful streets are places for people, not just movementComplete streets
Moving people and goods efficiently is essential to maintaining prosperous, sustainable communities. Our roads link people and places all across the region and form the backbone of the movement network in SEQ, connecting suburbs, towns and rural areas.
While streets are critical for movement, they have several other important functions too. These include access to properties, parking, utilities and services, biodiversity and most of all, placemaking. Depending on the context of an individual street, the priority of these functions will vary, and street design must respond appropriately.
In this study, the most successful streets blend their movement function with placemaking. The best residential streets were often simply designed and featured large street trees.
Streets in Centres of Activity and CBDs were carefully designed with footpaths, street trees, lighting, seating and other elements that collectively contribute to the public realm and streetscape.
Complete streets in SEQ integrate with an appropriate scale and form of neighbouring buildings, and also exhibit that SEQ subtropical essence, through materials, fences, shade, landscaping and other elements.
More detail of the principles of quality street design can be found in Complete Streets: Guidelines for urban street design (Institute for Public Works Engineering Australia, 2010).
Grey St, South Bank incorporates cycle ways in the road network
Scarborough St, Southport incorporates wide pedestrian footpaths and crossing points
32
The best neighbourhood streets are places in their own rightNeighbourhood streets
Abbott St, New Farm – a classic neighbourhood street
In SEQ, most residents live in neighbourhood streets. They are the most abundant of streets, stitching our residential and mixed use neighbourhoods together and providing access to homes and sometimes workplaces. As the name suggests, these streets are local in nature, providing access to properties in a neighbourhood but having a relatively minor traffic function. Neighbourhood streets also have many other functions, they are used to service properties with water, electricity and other services and provide routes for walking and cycling for recreation as well as commuting. They are also used for parking and maintain important stormwater conveyance and local biodiversity functions.
The best neighbourhood streets identified in this study did not have a prominent traffic function. Even when neighbourhood streets were wide, the space was often dominated by substantial trees, not asphalt.
Other streets are narrower and lined with attractive buildings and gardens, instead of blank fences or empty unused yards. Neighbourhood streets are as important to placemaking and neighbourhood character as they are to movement and property access.
Historically, street widths have been devised for many reasons, but this study identifies a common neighbourhood street typology comprising of a 7-8 m wide carriageway in a 15 m reserve (up to 20 m in older areas). Where wider verges are found, they were generously landscaped. Wider streets enable plenty of space for walking and cycling, a good relationship between buildings on either side of a street, and adequate space for vehicles, parking and trees.
33
Connect people and places, don’t just collect carsConnector streets
Streets with a more important connecting function must be designed to accommodate increased movement for all travel modes. The goal in planning these routes is connecting people with destinations, rather than collecting cars.
What’s more, connecting streets are often important people places. These streets house public transport routes, are home to shops and commerce (reflecting their accessibility to higher numbers of people), and form well known linear landmarks of our towns and cities.
A connector street typology of a 12.5 m roadway in a 20 m reserve was evident in this study. This width allows on-street parking, bus stops and cycle lanes to be accommodated into the street. A median is sometimes included with trees to form a boulevard.
More detail of street types can be found in Complete Streets: Guidelines for urban street design, (Institute for Public Works Engineering Australia, 2010).
Grande Ave, Springfield – a connector street
34
Use rear lanes frequently in neighbourhoods and centresRear lanes
This study found examples of laneways in every urban place type, serving a variety of functions. A laneway in a suburban neighbourhood can provide vehicle access to rear loaded houses, increasing the amenity of the primary streetscape and reducing impacts on traffic from frequent driveways. The relationship of buildings to the street is the key to the success of this street typology. For example, Varsity Lakes demonstrates how well a residential lane can function as a service and vehicle point for rear loaded housing product as well as the primary street frontage for secondary dwellings and fonzie flats. The interface between the rear loaded dwellings and those facing the laneway needs to be carefully considered for this configuration to succeed.
The position of buildings and windows must allow overlooking of the lane to maintain personal safety. Short lane lengths and views from neighbouring dwellings also assist.
In Urban Neighbourhoods (P5) and Centres of Activity (P6), laneways are an effective way to address parking and servicing requirements for businesses and residents. Continuous street frontages of active uses can be maintained by ensuring on-street parking is available, limiting driveways and providing for a quality public realm. Rear lanes were a frequent success factor in centres visited during this study.
Laneways in Centres of Activity and CBDs can transform an empty space in between buildings into a vibrant, attractive hub for people to meet and pass through.
Varsity Lakes utilises rear lanes for vehicle access to row houses and secondary entry points for home based businesses
35
Use four-way intersections in P4 and P5 NeighbourhoodsIntersections
Grid street networks have many advantages, including great connectivity, legibility and longer vistas. Grids also result in frequent cross-streets, or four-way intersections that must be managed appropriately.
For several decades, roundabouts have been used to do this job. While efficient at moving vehicles, roundabouts prioritise vehicles over walkers and cyclists. When overused, even drivers are inconvenienced. Two lane roundabouts are almost never suitable for places for pedestrians and cyclists.
Roundabouts are not common in most of the SEQ places in this study, except in the busiest centres and CBDs. In fact, un-signalised four-way intersections (often controlled by give way or stop signs) are found frequently in most place types (except in the much busier CBD locations).
Unsignalised four-ways fell out of favour because roundabouts are usually deemed to be safer for traffic, but four-ways have benefits too. They use less land, enable a grid street layout to be easily built, and are usually easier for pedestrians and cyclists to navigate. Four-way intersections are becoming accepted again.
Complete Streets: Guidelines for urban street design published in 2010 by the Institute for Public Works Engineering Australia (IPWEA, 2010) suggests uncontrolled or priority controlled four-way intersections are a valid option, when validated by appropriate traffic analysis.
Where four-way traffic movement is not desired, four-way active transport movement must still be achieved.
Un-signalised four-way intersection at Tedder Ave, Main Beach
36
Prioritise pedestrians especially in centres and CBDsPedestrian crossings
To increase the number of people getting out of their cars and around their suburbs and centres on foot, appropriate pedestrian infrastructure and street crossings must be planned and built.
A one-size-fits-all approach to pedestrian crossings is not appropriate. The standard of crossings is a function of the amount of street traffic and the importance of the pedestrian route. But few pedestrians do not always mean that few crossings are required.The opposite may be the case. Pedestrians might stay away until a safe, comfortable and interesting walking route exists.
In this study of SEQ places, few formal crossings were found in suburban streets. Pedestrians were certainly present at different times of the day, but there was often little traffic and pedestrians could cross at their leisure.
Urban Neighbourhoods are denser and have more people and traffic, but again formal crossings were not common. However, pedestrian refuges on busier streets and some signalised crossings at major intersections were needed, for both suburban and urban contexts.
In service and employment centres (whether Rural Townships, centres or CBDs) crossings become very important to the successful functioning of the place. Refuges, signalised crossings and zebra crossings were commonly present in these flourishing places. In CBDs, shared zones were common. The lesson from these busy and vibrant places is that high pedestrian priority crossings, such as zebra crossings and shared zones, are a critical ingredient in making the place attractive to people and successful centres need people more than anything else.
Pedestrian crossings prioritise pedestrian movement in Southport
37
Use stand-up kerbs and tight kerb radii on street cornersKerbs
The devil is often in the detail, and in street design the detail includes things like kerb types. Today, concrete kerb and channel can be shaped into almost any profile and shape but, as with many things, the old fashioned design is often the best.
Stand-up kerb was the most common kerb type across all place types in this study. In suburban streets, stand-up kerb was used more than 50 per cent of the time, while in urban places and in centres the stand-up kerb was almost universal. Flush kerb was also used in some neighbourhood streets and in CBD shared zones, where pedestrian priority is achieved by blending the vehicle and pedestrian space. Flush kerb is also appropriate to achieve water sensitive urban design, often in non-urban, suburban or park side settings.
Stand-up kerbs define the edge of a roadway better and keep vehicles away from the footpath. Roll-over kerb, popular in late 20th century suburban expansion, allows cars to park easily on the verge, but the message to pedestrians is that the whole road reserve has space for cars. Parking on footpaths is illegal and causes significant inconvenience for residents.
Many of the surveyed places in the study have corner radii much tighter than usual under recent standards, with clear benefits to walkability and safety. Relatively sharp corners (such as 3 m radii on local streets) are a highly effective speed control measure, removing the need for bumps and traffic islands and the like. A sharper corner radii makes the pedestrian crossing narrower, shortening the time for pedestrians to cross and making it safer and easier to cross.
Stand up kerb in a neightbourhood street
38
Street trees provide shelter and create a sense of space and placeShelter and shade
In the SEQ subtropical climate, shade and shelter boost the walkability of a street. Shade protects pedestrians from the elements as well as reducing heat island effects.
In this study, trees were the most common means of providing shade, although in centres and CBDs building awnings and other structures are important for shade and weather protection. Some of the most attractive and inviting streets were lined with consistent and mature street trees spaced to allow their crowns to touch to form a canopy. Streets lined with consistent tree species, with different streets planted with different species, create visual interest. Selecting the right species for local conditions ensures their health and longevity in the urban environment.
Care must be taken to minimise clashes between buried infrastructure and tree roots to ensure enough space exists for both.
Street trees can also be used to narrow the carriageway width, in a physical sense and a perceived sense, helping to slow traffic. Tree lined pathways can provide useful visual links between focal points within a place type including areas of open spaces, and residential and commercial areas that might otherwise feel disconnected. A tree lined street helps to create a sense of comfort and enclosure for pedestrians.
Street trees in commercial areas can mimic human scale and lessen the dominance of taller structures.
Streettrees provide shade over the footpath in Bulimba
39
On-street car parking is important to parking supply and vitalityOn-street parking
In this study, on-street parking was well provided for and provided the flexibility to accommodate residents and visitors. On-street car parking in neighbourhoods and centres delivers a range of benefits, including reduced on-site parking demands, slowing passing traffic and activating the street as people move from their vehicle to a destination.
In Next Generation Suburban (P4) and Urban Neighbourhoods (P5), rear lanes and shared driveways can increase on-street parking provision where a higher demand is expected. Rear loaded housing increases the amenity of the primary street and promotes walkability.
In mixed use areas, developments with compact housing forms and transit oriented development precincts, reduced car parking rates and opportunities for shared car parking work well.
A mix of uses within a neighbourhood or centre tend to have varying peak times and demand and allow parking spaces to serve a range of surrounding businesses and customers. In Grey Street at South Bank, a diversity of uses that function day and night including restaurants and cafes, cinemas and offices share the parking.
Sensible use of on-street parking, which is a feature of the streets this handbook promotes, can also help reduce the need for on-site parking, which can reduce housing costs. This is further discussed in 4.10, off-street parking.
On-street parking on major roads requires separate consideration against road planning objectives.
The car parking for this apartment complex is located at the rear via a shared access point which improves on-street parking opportunity and the visual appeal of the building
40
Sustainable development protects and conserves the urban water cycleWater Sensitive Urban Design
Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) focuses on the efficient and effective management of the urban water cycle and ensures that natural water systems within the urban environment are protected to allow them to function more effectively. WSUD is a desirable solution to stormwater management and in this study it found that several greenfield developments had integrated the design objectives for managing urban stormwater into the landscape.
Some WSUD applications include rainwater storage tanks suitable for rural, suburban and urban areas, grass or landscaped swales, infiltration trenches and bio-retention trenches, porous pavements, greywater harvesting and treatment ponds.
In urban environments, WSUD is useful for managing stormwater quality, improving waterway stability and managing the frequency of flows. Site conditions, climate, catchment and pollutant characteristics will influence the selection of WSUD applications.
This handbook supports the use of WSUD principles and reflects the State Planning Policy for Healthy Waters 2010 (Queensland Government, 2010d), and Technical Guidelines - Implementation Guideline no. 7. (Queensland Government, 2009b).
Springfield Lakes is a residential development that demonstrates several WSUD features
Lot and building scale
4.0
The approach to development on individual lots and buildings can do much to promote the Next Generation Planning concepts of Smart Growth and Affordable Living. It also offers the best opportunities to achieve consistency in basic standards across the region to reduce housing costs and promote affordable living.
Note: The names given to dwelling types in these pages describe types of buildings. In Queensland Planning Provisions (QPP) compliant planning schemes, dwelling types are usually given definitions in the context of material change of use (MCU) development. More than one MCU definition may be relevant to particular buildings (i.e. a row house may be developed as either a dwelling house on a separate freehold lot or as a multiple dwelling on common property. In both cases the built form is the same).
This part of the guidelines covers:
4.1 Detached houses on wide lots4.2 Detached houses on narrow lots4.3 The “plexes” – duplexes/triplexes/ quadplexes/quinplexes4.4 Row houses4.5 Secondary dwellings4.6 Live/work buildings4.7 Low rise apartments4.8 Medium and high rise apartments4.9 Consistent lot types4.10 Off-street parking4.11 Addressing the street4.12 Build to the slope4.13 Height4.14 Space around the house4.15 Carports and garages
43
An appropriate housing option for some householdsDetached houses on wide lots
Detached houses on traditionally sized lots are a large part of the housing stock in SEQ. They serve the needs of a wide range of household types.
In SEQ, these lots are typically around 20 m wide, and from 450 m2 to 2000 m2. When they occur in large tracts without other forms of housing, this housing type is highly land consumptive and contributes to unsustainable urban sprawl. Smart Growth means using land more efficiently for this form of housing and mixing it with other forms, particularly in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4), but also in existing urban neighbourhoods (P5). It is also easy to design this housing to incorporate secondary dwellings and still look the same.
Some of the great examples in SEQ of detached houses on larger lots challenge the traditional front setback of 6 m, demonstrating that smaller setbacks at the front and side of a property achieve a more efficient use of private land and provide great amenity or character. Houses with smaller building footprints allow space for deep planted gardens and vegetation cover, natural drainage and stormwater flow, treed back yards, cultivating crops and keeping pets.
Detached houses of modest scale with small site coverage are a robust and flexible development form, allowing for the renovation and expansion of houses over time to accommodate more modern living choices, changing household sizes and financial circumstances.
Detached houses are easily owned individually without the need for a body corporate.
A traditional Queenslander detached house on a larger lot at Rosewood
44
Small lot housing is found in some of SEQ’s most loved neighbourhoodsDetached houses on narrow lots
In recent times in SEQ, as elsewhere, single and double storey detached houses are being developed on much narrower and smaller lots. This housing is also found in many older, widely admired neighbourhoods. This housing type can take a number of forms, including those referred to as cottage and villa style homes. They require some elements of the building design to be carefully managed, such as dwelling size, setbacks, private open space and car parking.
Cottages are small single storey dwellings on small lots that are relatively compact and usually have a single car parking space (or two tandem car spaces), so car parking does not dominate its streetscape. These houses can be relatively small in size in some places, similar to the size of traditional dwellings built during the first half of the 20th century. Lot frontages for cottage dwellings can be narrow (10-12.5 m).
Allowing some setbacks to the front and side for habitable rooms provides for natural light, cross ventilation and better design outcomes. Setbacks on one side of the lot can be very small, while garages, service areas and verandahs can be built to a lot boundary.
Double storey detached housing on small lots will enable a smaller site coverage, while retaining areas for private open space, deep planting areas, trees, natural drainage, vegetation and reusable gardens. Some double storey houses can have car access from rear lanes, allowing parking for two cars. Double storey buildings create improved street enclosure and definition, which works well in Urban Neighbourhoods.
Granville St, West End demonstrates a number of detached houses on 250 m2 lots
45
A compact housing form compatible with high quality streetscapes The ‘plexes’ – duplexes/triplexes/quadplexes/quinplexes
Duplexes are paired dwellings sharing a single internal wall, while triplexes, quadplexes and quinplexes are similar but with three, four and five dwellings in turn. They can be single or two storeys and some, particularly duplexes, can present to the street similar to a detached house.
Plexes are often best sited on a corner, to punctuate the street end and accommodate more than one driveway. They are an effective way to increase density, in both urban and Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods. Sometimes two detached houses can be on the one lot. These housing forms are generally located in P4 and P5 neighbourhoods, interspersed with other housing forms.
There are many good examples of duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes and quinplexes in SEQ, particularly in newer, integrated developments such as Varsity Lakes.
A modern duplex on a corner lot in Granville Street, West End
46
Row houses form great streetscapes and efficient housingRow houses
Row houses, also called terraces, are a number of attached houses of two to four storeys on individual lots. Usually more than three to four row houses are located together. Long rows of more than eight houses are uncommon in SEQ.
Row houses should have car access and servicing from a rear lane, creating high quality streetscapes not compromised with pedestrian safety and amenity by multiple driveways over footpaths.
Private open space requires fencing for privacy and is often located between the dwelling and the rear garage or car port. To maximise the area of open space and contribute to a more urban streetscape, front setbacks are small.To add privacy, main living areas or front habitable rooms are elevated. Lot and building widths can be as narrow as the width of one bedroom or as wide as two bedrooms.
Two storey row houses with semi-basement parking Bulimba
Rear lane access to row houses, Varsity Lakes
47
Granny and Fonzie flats can provide low cost, flexible housing options for suburbsSecondary dwellings
The granny flat or secondary dwelling in a backyard or under the house has been a relatively common form of dwelling in SEQ for many decades. Usually these dwellings have remained in the same ownership as the principal dwelling, and are used by family members or students, sometimes for temporary periods.
Some modern developments have taken this concept further by developing loft apartments or ‘fonzie flats’, usually above garages in rear lane accessed houses. As well as providing small, studio style accommodation, these dwellings have the advantage of providing casual surveillance of the lane from occupied rooms. Sometimes these flats are used for work instead of living, and can be kept in the same ownership as the principal dwelling, or be separately titled to create a low cost purchase option for first home buyers.
Secondary dwelling and loft apartments are unlikely to create additional infrastructure demands or amenity impacts, and should be made easily developable especially in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods and Urban Neighbourhoods.
Pitt St, Toowoomba provides many examples of secondary dwellings utilising a rear lane
48
A flexible lifestyle option and transition between housing and commercial usesLive/work buildings
Live/work buildings include a home and a workplace. This is not a new idea - in older residential areas small shops were common, built in front of a house to the front boundary with an awning over the street. These stores often faced busier through streets and were located on corner sites, hence the name ‘corner store’.
While the traditional corner store is generally not part of new SEQ neighbourhoods, working from home is recognised as an increasing trend in recent decades. The result is that offices and workshops are being incorporated into residences, particularly in more urban places. Home workshops and offices attached to a residential use can back onto parking areas used for retail or mixed use purposes, allowing for shared parking arrangements. Higher site cover is appropriate for buildings of this type. Live/work buildings can provide an appropriate transition from a residential building to a commercial or retail space.
Houses are sometimes converted to offices and shops, and vice versa. This can only happen if the design is ‘robust’ enough to be converted to a different use. Buildings on street corners or near Centres of Activity are more likely to be suitable for this approach. Street patterns must also be robust enough to adapt to changing uses. While knocking down houses and rebuilding is not always desirable, knocking down a cul-de-sac near to a centre to allow for more intense land uses is next to impossible.
Row houses can easily incorporate live/work arrangements. In SEQ, there are good examples of three storey row houses with offices and parking at ground level and living spaces above. More commonly, the ‘shop-top housing’ model accommodates commercial or retail space on the ground floor of a detached dwelling with a second level residential use.
A fonzi flat/home office situated above a garage in Varsity Lakes
Ground floor vet with residence above at Moffat Beach
49
A compact housing form appropriate for more urban placesLow rise apartments
Low rise apartments are generally two to three storeys, often above semi-basement car parking. Buildings of this scale can have open stairs and balcony access, enabling design for cross ventilation which is important for subtropical and energy efficient design. Alternatively, low rise apartments can be accessed via a lift, although this usually results in higher cost constructions and maintenance with the additional costs being passed onto the purchaser/resident.
An apartment building can be part of an integrated development by a single developer on an amalgamated site, or a separate development. Apartment buildings usually require community titling, with common property managed through a body corporate.
Low rise apartment buildings in SEQ demonstrate that small setbacks to street frontages are possible and the quality of the human experience relates to the height of the building, width of the street and front boundary treatment (e.g. fencing and landscaping). Access to spaces for leisure and recreation is an important consideration in the design of low rise apartments, which includes private, communal and public open space.
Two storey apartments with basement parking provided as part of an integrated development, Bulimba
50
Accommodate higher density living in urban places Medium and high rise apartments
Medium (4-10 storeys) and high rise apartment buildings have an upper limit determined by the context of the place. They are most appropriate in Urban Neighbourhoods (P5), Centres of Activity (P6) and CBD (P7) locations.
In Centres of Activity and CBDs, the ground floor of an apartment building should accommodate retail or commercial spaces. This vertical mix of uses within medium and high rise apartments is desirable in places where there are busy streets and high levels of accessibility and pedestrian activity.
Particularly for high rise apartments, design is to be carefully managed to avoid overshadowing of the street, which can be achieved by towers above broad podiums. This design feature is particularly evident in CBDs across SEQ. Towers may have a narrow floor plan to maximise north facing apartments and cross ventilation.
Mixed use retail/commerical to create a more ‘human scaled’ streetscape, Labrador
51
Consistent lot types and dimensions
Minimum lot sizes are used in most SEQ planning regulations as the primary tool to regulate dwelling type, but they can be a blunt instrument impacting on the capacity to accommodate diverse housing types. The width and depth of a lot are much more important to its suitability for different housing forms and have a much greater effect on streetscape outcomes.
The width and depth of a lot are important determinants of the type of housing that can be provided on it. As a general rule, a standard sized lot is desirable as it achieves a more efficient layout and is more cost effective in terms of infrastructure provision and house building (ULDA, 2010).
To achieve efficient use of land and services, the width of a lot should be as narrow as possible, while enabling appropriate design and function for the desired dwelling type.
The quality of a street is more about the width of the lots than their depth (which often cannot be perceived).
Relatively consistent lot widths create a rhythm of the street that works well in creating neighbourhood character. But lots need to vary to accommodate a range of housing types.
The depth and area of a lot needs to be sufficient to allow for areas of private open space, landscaping and, where applicable, rear access.
Consistent lot widths of Granville Street, West End create a rhythm of the street
52
Consistent lot dimensions across the region are desirable for efficiency of design and construction. Every time a house plan has to be altered to suit moderate differences in planning schemes, costs and delays are incurred. This does not mean that local governments and communities lose control over which type of lots and houses are appropriate, and where they should be located. But when a ‘Villa’ or ‘Cottage’ allotment is needed we use a consistent definition of what a ‘Villa’ and ‘Cottage’ lot dimension is.
The Urban Land Development Authority (ULDA) has developed a consistent typology of residential lots for its projects. The lot dimensions are appropriate for use across SEQ, and this handbook adopts these dimensions.
53
Less car parking promotes Smart Growth and Affordable LivingOff-street parking
Providing car parking can be highly land consumptive and costly, and affects dwelling yield. This has significant impacts on the cost of housing. The use of limited space for vehicle parking in more urban locations is an inefficient use of land, particularly where other transport options are available, and affects affordable living.
In locations well served by public transport, reference to the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guide and parking rates is recommended (Queensland Government, 2010).
Many successful housing products are breaking the mould and challenging the traditional need to provide a double garage for every housing type. Innovative solutions not commonly used in Australia are recommended, such as ‘unbundling’ car parking, which allows for buying car parks as an option for the housing purchaser.
In a well designed mixed use neighbourhood, people can live without a car and this should be an available choice where there is an efficient public transport system in place. A mixed use neighbourhood will provide a variety of destinations within comfortable walking or cycling distance of one another, reducing car dependency. Families are able to walk their children to school or cycle a short distance to work. This is in distinct contrast to conventional single-use zones, which require people to travel long distances to fulfil basic daily needs.
In Centres of Activity and CBDs, parking structures are best connected directly to the street rather than other buildings as this increases pedestrian presence on the street. Some parking can be located in multi-level shared parking that is hidden from main street frontages. Short Street at Southport is an excellent example of shared car parking sleeved behind a bustling main street making this a successful and enjoyable place to be.
Residential development at Surbiton St, Carindale provides discreet access for vehicle parking
54
Buildings address the street, with setbacks appropriate to the place typeAddressing the street
This study indicates that buildings addressing the street bring many benefits. It ensures the street maintains its ‘people function’, rather than being a road for the sole purpose of moving through traffic; and promotes safety through casual overlooking.
Often, the more urban a setting, the closer a building is to the street. However, in many places in this study, there is still a small front yard. These spaces still play an important function, with the examples in this study indicating that these areas can complement street trees to create a more integrated streetscape. Low or see through fencing of front boundaries also promotes the quality of the streetscape.
Building frontages can contribute to the creation of lively, active streetscapes (such as shop fronts, indoor/outdoor cafes and restaurants). They stimulate activities that are likely to foster casual, social and business interaction for extended periods and encourage night time activity which increases safety by having more people around. The level of activation should correspond with street and retail hierarchies, as not all streets can nor should be fully activated. Active frontages are desirable in at least some parts of most place types, particularly in central, focal parts of neighbourhoods and, of course, in Centres of Activities and CBDs.
Service and vehicle entries are best located off rear service lanes or secondary side streets. In some instances, service access can be achieved through a screened, narrow entry at the front that is integrated with the surrounding streetscape.
This house in Granville St, West End is built close to the road, presenting benefits such as improved CPTED, streetscape quality and space at the rear for private open space or car parking
55
Design buildings to the landform, not landform to the buildingsBuild to the slope
The buildings, streets and neighbourhoods explored during this study are built on varied topographies. Many sites are flat, others sloping, and a few locations can only be described as steep. This reflects the SEQ situation, but today more and more development is taking place on sloping land.
A common response to slope is to cut and fill sites and create flat pads for houses and other buildings, and even to alter the landform to enable streets to be constructed to preferred standards. Some earthworks are to be expected, but overuse of these techniques can result in expanses of ugly retaining walls, the loss of trees and vegetation and interference with natural drainage systems. In more compact settings, individual retaining walls between buildings are harder and harder to construct efficiently and aesthetically.
Few of the buildings in this study relied on site retaining to overcome slope. Instead, elevated and split-levels building construction is used to achieve level changes in a more sensitive manner. The classic ‘Queenslander’ house is famous for being highset and built on the flattest and steepest of sites with minimal impact on natural landforms and stormwater flows. That technique is integral to SEQ’s built character.
Using row housing to step down the slope at Springfield
56
Locate and design building height to maintain human scaleHeight
In most place types, maintaining a human scale is important. This means having a scale of building that is comfortable for people on the street. This has implications for the height and shape of buildings.
Human scaled components can reduce building bulk and create people friendly environments. Podiums are an effective way to achieve this, with taller building elements set back from the street. Semi-public attachments, such as front entry spaces, verandahs, balconies, bay windows and porches can facilitate this in residential neighbourhoods.
Taller buildings are best located in centres, and areas of high amenity such as near open space. Locating taller buildings on corner sites and around large public parks and plazas enables longer views down streets and better enclosure of the streetscape. Medium density development works well when constructed at similar heights to mature shade trees on the street.
On buildings over two storeys, the level of architectural detail required at the ground floor is increased to add interest and depth to the pedestrian environment.
Building height may also be influenced by the need to design for flood events.
Apartments in Duporth Avenue, Maroochydore are kept to three storeys on the street, with the tower pushed further back into the site ensuring a more ‘human scale’ on the street
57
Bring back the backyardSpace around the house
Recent studies have documented the disappearance of the backyard from Australian suburban development in the 1990s and 2000s (Hall, 2010). This phenomenon appears to have accompanied the rapid increase in the size of new suburban homes, rather than decreasing lot sizes. In fact, several examples of houses on small lots but with sizable back yards were identified in this study. Modest house sizes are the key to achieving this goal.
While local public open space may compensate in some ways for smaller private gardens on an individual lot, the backyard has other roles too. It reduces impervious areas such as roofs, allows greater stormwater infiltration and preservation of natural landform, enhances privacy and amenity, and allows space for plants and animals, whether they be veggie patch, pets, or native plants and birdlife.
Smaller front setbacks may enable larger setbacks at the rear to accommodate private open space in back gardens with mature trees.
Some front of building elements, such as verandahs and front porches, can encroach on building setbacks as they promote socialisation, passive surveillance, subtropical living and improve street amenity.
Wide verandahs at the front, side and rear of houses are an iconic feature of SEQ neighbourhoods and are central to an indoor/outdoor lifestyle. Their continued use is encouraged.
This small lot house in Murphy St, Ipswich demonstrates how larger rear setbacks accommodate back gardens and mature trees
58
Providing for car accommodation in a pedestrian oriented streetscapeCarports and garages
While vehicle access to each dwelling is a part of residential design, managing the locations of car parking has a positive impact on streetscape character, pedestrian access and amenity.
The best examples from this study are buildings with garages located in a way that does not dominate the streetscape and often hardly visible at all.
Carports and garages are best located towards the rear of the house, or well integrated into the surrounding streetscape and architecture. Reduced side setbacks enable informal side driveway access to the rear of the house. Narrow lots are best accessed via a rear lane or otherwise have single or tandem car spaces only.
Garages and carports can be located at the rear of the site with driveway access along the other side boundary. A side setback can be wide to allow vehicle access to the rear of the site and views past buildings to rear gardens can provide outlook from the sides of the buildings to green areas. These spaces are normally oriented to the north or east of the dwelling.
This side setback allows for driveways along one side to a garage at the rear and reduces car dominance on the street
PART B
This part of the handbook provides modular planning scheme provisions which can be used to implement and regulate the concepts in Part A: the guidelines. These provisions are designed to be readily imported into planning schemes, and for use in formulating and assessing new development proposals.
Like the guidelines, the planning scheme modules are ordered by scale as follows:
5.0 Sub-regional and district scale6.0 Neighbourhood (local) scale7.0 Street scale8.0 Lot and building scale
Planning scheme modules
Sub-regional and district scale
5.0
Planning at the sub-regional and district scales can be articulated through the strategic framework in local government QPP planning schemes. Within the QPP structure, one of the important themes of the strategic framework is the Settlement Pattern.
The SEQ Place Model provides a good basis for the settlement pattern theme. The following sections are designed to assist in the drafting of QPP planning schemes through the adaption of the SEQ Place Model into the settlement pattern.
The content provided here is exemplar and will require further development and adaptation to suit local circumstances.
This part of the planning scheme modules includes:5.1 SEQ Place Model in a strategic framework 5.2 SEQ Place Model in a strategic plan
The QPP indicates the strategic framework in local government planning schemes is to comprise the following sections:
- Theme heading
- Strategic outcomes
- Elements
- Specific outcomes
- Land use strategies
Further explanation of the QPP requirements for each of these sections is provided in the QPP. The following sections of this document describe how the SEQ Place Model can be used within this framework.
61
SEQ Place Model in a strategic framework
Theme: Compact settlementFor local governments that have a regional plan in place, theme headings for the strategic framework are to be derived from the Desired Regional Outcomes (DRO) in the regional plan. The SEQ Regional Plan settlement pattern DRO heading is ‘Compact settlement’.
QPP Strategic Outcomes Strategic outcomes represent the ‘big picture’ policy direction for the local government area as a whole, relevant to the particular theme. The SEQ Place Model provides a framework to articulate strategic outcomes for the Compact settlement theme, and linked to the intent of the DROs in the SEQ Regional Plan.
Examples of Strategic outcomes that support the SEQ Place Model within the compact settlement theme are:
1. Urban development in the (…) LGA occurs in existing urban areas and planned urban extensions that are contiguous with existing urban areas.
2. Higher density development is focussed around centres of activity and public transport nodes and corridors.
3. Greenfield areas are developed in a way that makes efficient use of land.
4. All new development is adequately serviced by and integrated with the public transport network.
5. Connectivity is achieved between residential uses, employment opportunities and services through the provision of walkable communities integrated with efficient public transport services.
6. Centres of Activity are the focus of employment, infill housing and community services that meets the needs of residential communities connected by a high frequency public transport network.
7. Development is designed and located to achieve high quality urban design, subtropical design and smart growth principles.
8. Housing choice is available to meet the needs of a diverse community and located to achieve affordable living outcomes.
9. An integrated and high quality greenspace network caters to the needs of residents, particularly in and around Centres of Activity and higher density areas.
62
Place Types Overview
P1 Natural Places
Areas dominated by the natural environment and other lands containing mostly undisturbed, natural conditions.
P2 Rural Places
Rural production and landscapes, rural living. Rural living is an element of rural landscape but in smarter communities is secondary to rural production.
P3 Rural Townships
The range of smaller rural townships in SEQ.
P4 Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods
Walkable local areas, which are people (rather than car) focussed and contain a choice of housing types and some other local uses in a mixed use setting.
P5 Urban Neighbourhoods
Walkable, high density local areas, which are people (rather than car) focussed and contain a wider choice of other housing types and more mixed use than suburban neighbourhoods.
P6 Centres of Activity
Vibrant and intense mixed use centres including housing, retail, employment, education and entertainment facilities. Some taller buildings are part of the built form character.
P7 CBDs
Central business districts e.g. of Brisbane, Ipswich, Toowoomba - centres of production as well as consumption.
P8 Specific Use Places
Large single use/focus places that don’t fit into other place types e.g. industry, ports, prisons, major sport & recreation.
Element 1: SEQ Place Model The SEQ Place Model can be used for the broadscale planning of a local government area. It divides the LGA into broad place types that share common characteristics, development forms and quality planning outcomes.
The model is intended to describe ‘best practice’ places of the future, rather than existing places. Hence, it outlines a future desired outcome for an area.
The model is particularly useful as a strategic planning tool used for the high level planning of a LGA as a whole. In addition, it is an effective communication tool that can be easily understood and interpreted by the community.
Consistent with QPP requirements for the strategic framework in local government planning schemes, the accompanying table provides examples of specific outcomes and land use strategies under the SEQ Place Model element of the compact settlement theme.
63
Element 1: SEQ Place Model (cont.)
Natural Places (P1)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. Natural Places are dominated by the natural environment. They perform essential functions as green space, ecological and landscape areas, which are vital to protecting our ecological assets and biodiversity, provide access to natural experiences and a landscape frame for other places.
2. Natural Places include national parks and similar publicly owned, natural areas, together with some privately owned land with similar attributes.
3. Natural Places do not experience development other than low key activites that allow appropriate access for recreation and maintenance, including walking and maintenance access tracks.
4. Development in these areas is undertaken in a way that ensures protection of the ecological and visual values of the Natural Places.
5. On privately owned land, rural or other activities do not intrude on the ecological values of these places.
1. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the (…) LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
64
Rural Places (P2)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. Rural Places are mostly used for rural production, from less intense activities like cattle grazing, to more intensive cropping and animal husbandry, forestry and carbon sequestration.
2. Rural Places are important for the protection of valuable agricultural land and its rural production.
3. Rural Places provide traditional farm lifestyles, although many residents have other employment off the farm.
4. Rural Places contribute to the landscape setting of the region and its urban communities located in other place types described below.
5. Housing is mostly dwellings on farm properties for those who live/work on the land.
6. Some of these places are used for rural living, where people live on large lots but don’t use the land for any substantial rural production.
1. Areas used for rural living are restricted to those identified in the SEQ Regional Plan.
2. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the (…) LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
65
Rural Townships (P3)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. Rural Townships are small settlements surrounded by rural places. They centre on a mixed use, low scale main street, usually with traditional awnings over the footpath. The mix of uses is often eclectic, with shops, halls, churches, schools, industry, a park and housing in a harmonious mix, bound together by the character of the street and the buildings.
2. Rural Townships provide a range of housing, mostly detached, on lots larger than found in suburban and urban neighbourhoods. Other types of housing are present in the townships, including apartments, duplexes and aged care, and cater for people in the town and surrounding rural areas as their housing needs change.
3. Rural Townships have a range of local community facilities and services but rely on larger centres for higher order uses such as employment, hospitals, education and cultural facilities, universities, theatres etc as well as major shopping.
4. Rural Townships are based on a traditional grid street pattern, which give them a robust structure which is easy to navigate. Urban expansion of these places would extend that grid pattern to reflect the traditional character of the place.
5. Urban development occurs in Rural Townships which have public transport access and the new development results in an extension of the existing grid street network.
1. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the (…) LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
66
Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhood (P4)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods are characterised by walkability between a range of housing and a central focus.
2. Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods offer a choice of housing types, including detached houses, duplexes, row houses, shop-top housing and live/work buildings. While detached houses are the most common use of the lot, many detached houses are on a range of smaller lots.
3. Housing other than detached houses in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods are often on lots with particular attributes, like corner lots, lots with rear lane access, and lots located near open space, centres or public transport.
4. Housing in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods is within easy walking and cycling distance to a range of local facilities, like shops, schools and parks, and public transport.
5. Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods are generally low in scale. They have a feel of openness at the street level, and a sense of buildings within a treed setting.
6. Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods streets are characterised by street trees, which provide shade and character, and shared use by cars, bikes and walkers. Their streets are usually grid-based and connected in a way that make it easy to find your way around.
7. Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods are generally located close to Urban Neighbourhoods and Centres of Activity where their residents can readily access higher order services and facilities.
1. Development in local government growth areas A and B incorporates Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods.
2. Development in existing suburban areas supports Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhood outcomes, where identified for this purpose in local plans and precincts.
3. Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods are located within the Urban Footprint established under the SEQ Regional Plan.
4. Development in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods provides for a density of between 15–30 dwellings per hectare.
5. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the … LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
67
Urban Neighbourhoods (P5)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. Urban Neighbourhoods are higher density, walkable, mixed use neighbourhoods. They may be older suburbs closer to centres or parts of new communities that are planned to achieve this outcome.
2. Urban Neighbourhoods have good public transport access and have been developed or redeveloped over time at higher densities and with a greater mix of housing and uses than Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods. Detached houses are found in these areas, but usually in small pockets and within a more urban setting.
3. Urban Neighbourhoods take different forms, from areas where medium density or medium scale buildings are dominant to higher density places with major high rise buildings. They are often transit oriented. Higher density Urban Neighbourhoods usually have a number of suburban neighbourhoods nearby.
4. Urban Neighbourhoods are characterised by mixed use, providing ready access to a range of shopping, community and other local services. Housing not in a mixed use setting in these places is within easy walking and cycling distance to non-residential uses and public transport.
5. Urban Neighbourhoods have a sense of enclosure at the street level provided by small building setbacks, with the man made part of its character usually dominant. Urban Neighbourhoods streets are characterised by street trees which provide shade and character, hard footpaths for walking trips, and through pavements shared by cars and bikes. Their streets are usually grid-based and connected in a way that make it easy to find your way around.
1. Development in local government growth areas A and B incorporates Urban Neighbourhoods.
2. Urban Neighbourhoods are located within the Urban Footprint established under the SEQ Regional Plan.
3. Development in Urban Neighbourhoods provides for a density of at least 30 dwellings per hectare.
4. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the … LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
68
Centres of Activity (P6)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. Centres of Activity focus on concentrations of non-residential activities, like shopping, offices, government, higher education and entertainment. They come in various scales, from local to district and regional, and are more varied in character than Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods and Urban Neighbourhoods. They are a focus of transport networks, and a hub for public transport and local pedestrian and cycling.
2. Centres of Activity also contain higher density housing. They provide for residents in and around the centres with ready access to the range of uses and employment they offer.
3. Centres of Activity have a strong sense of enclosure at the street level, with little or no building setback to the street. The man made part of its character is dominant, but punctuated by squares and quality urban parks. Vibrancy flows from their mix of uses, level of activity and urban qualities. They are important meeting places and focal points for their communities. Their streets are lined with street trees, which provide shade and character, have hard footpaths for walking trips, and through pavements shared use by cars and bikes. They are usually grid-based and connected in a way that make it easy to find your way.
4. Centres of Activity are surrounded by, and connected to, Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods and Urban Neighbourhoods
1. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the … LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
69
CBDs (P7)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. The CBD is the centre the LGA, its biggest centre, and has the widest range and greatest intensity of activity in the LGA. It is the heart of the LGA, and the place that most people who know this LGA think of when it is mentioned.
2. The CBD is important to the economy of the city, both as a centre of production and consumption.
3. The CBD is laid out in a grid, and at the centre of transport networks, for public transport, cycling and pedestrians.
4. The CBD is urban. Buildings dominate the streets, although the streets are important elements of their character. Its streets are lined with street trees, hard footpaths for walking trips, and pavements shared by cars and bikes.
5. The large scale and intensity of the CBD provides a vibrancy unlike any other part of the LGA. It is the key focal point for our communities, as places to work, do business, for entertainment or just to enjoy. It is a meeting place, with squares and urban parks.
1. The CBD is located at (…) as indicated on the strategic plan map for the (…) LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
70
Specific Use Places (P8)
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (Hypothetical examples only)
SEQ Place Model 1. Specific Use Places are large single use/focus places that do not fit into other place types. They are restricted to a small number of locations with a large single use/focus and take a quite different form to the other place types. Housing usually has a very minor role in Specific Use Places.
2. Specific Use Places are recognised as a different place because their scale and nature mean they have a quite different form that does not integrate with the other place types.
3. Specific Use Places are not used for single purpose zonings for places such as large shopping centres, universities or hospitals.
1. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the (…) LGA in Schedule 2.
Note: land use strategies are very specific (e.g. they identify locations where particular development will occur).
71
Element 2: Urban structuring for Smart Growth The urban structure of a LGA is an assembly of the place types in the SEQ Place Model described under QPP element 1 above. The key principles for the organisation of these urban areas are based around walkable neighbourhoods that provide access to a range of employment opportunities, services and public transport options.
Organising the urban areas of a LGA in a logical and efficient manner will achieve a compact settlement structure and an efficient use of available land and infrastructure.
An urban structure that achieves these outcomes is demonstrated by the accompanying drawing and table.
Consistent with the QPP requirements for the strategic framework in local government planning schemes, the accompanying table provides examples of specific outcomes and land use strategies under the ‘urban structuring for smart growth’ element of the compact settlement theme.
The principles of organising the place types
72
Element Specific outcomes Land use strategies (hypothetical examples only)
Urban structuring for Smart Growth
1. Urban structuring for smart growth is consistent with the accompanying diagram.
2. The principles of organisation of the urban structure for smart growth are as follows:
a. CBDs act as the focal place of the region.
b. CBDs are dominated by a number of Urban Neighbourhoods surrounding, mostly of high density. In some instances, a Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods could be close to a CBD.
c. Centres of Activity are focal places outside of the CBD. A range of housing types will be found in their 400 m catchments around their mixed use core.
d. Surrounding the Centre of Activity are a series of lower density Urban Neighbourhoods and Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods.
e. Similarly, a cluster of Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods will generate a need and opportunity for more Urban Neighbourhoods and Centres of Activity.
f. The urban structure is framed and defined by Natural Places and Rural Places which do not have a walkable catchment. Some stand-alone Rural Townships are located amongsth Rural Places.
3. Urban place types are linked to each other by public transport, cycleways, pedestrian routes and the primary through street network. Higher order public transport corridors and other movement types directly link the CBD and Centres of Activity and more urban scale neighbourhoods along these routes. Lower order public transport link the Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods to Urban Neighbourhoods and Centres of Activity.
1. The CBD for this LGA is located at …
2. All Centres of Activity are located on the … rail (or .. busway) network.
3. Local and precinct plans for large scale/growth areas are consistent with this element.
4. Development is consistent with the strategic plan map for the … LGA in Schedule 2.
73
The QPP require the strategic framework for each local government area to be supported by strategic plan mapping in Schedule 2 of the planning scheme. As stated in the example land use strategies provided earlier, development in the local government area is to be consistent with the strategic plan map for the LGA.
An example of what a strategic plan that incorporates the SEQ Place Model might look like is provided.
SEQ Place Model in a strategic plan mapping
74
The SEQ Place Model as a strategic plan
Neighbourhood (local) scale
6.0
Neighbourhoods are the building blocks of Next Generation Neighbourhoods. This module articulates how neighbourhood design - scale, street networks, block size, zoning etc. can be articulated in a QPP planning scheme, in codes, levels of assessment and zoning.
Exemplar performance outcomes are provided along with ‘provisions for acceptable outcomes’ in the form of tables and drawings.
The content provided herein is exemplar and will require further development and adaptation to suit individual planning scheme requirements.
This part of the planning scheme modules includes:
6.1 Neighbourhood scale module
77
Neighbourhood scale module
Overall outcomes or purpose statementDevelopment results in a connected network of walkable neighbourhoods supporting affordable living and smart growth.
Performance outcomes
1. Neighbourhood design results in a connected network of walkable neighbourhoods. Neighbourhood street networks provide an easy choice of routes within and surrounding neighbourhoods, and connect to public transport, employment, open space and services.
2. Neighbourhood design supports diverse housing choices through block size, lot design and mix (and zoning and levels of assessment).
3. Neighbourhood design provides for non-residential uses appropriate to place type. Neighbourhoods are focussed around local activity centres, open space, community uses and/or public transport.
4. Neighbourhood design responds to natural systems including topography, drainage and local and regional biodiversity. Orientation of streets and lots support subtropical design.
Walkable neighbourhood structure
Scale 400m (5 min) walkable catchment to focal point 800m+ (10 min+) walkable catchment to major centre/quality PT/TOD precinct
Focal point P4: neighbourhood or local centre, local park or PT (bus) on Neighbourhood connector/Main street
P5: neighbourhood or local or district centre, parks and quality PT on Neighbourhood connector/Main street
Street network
Grid based Orientation N-S or E-W where slope allows Streets follow ridges/gullies/perpendicular to slope to minimise cut and fill
Street types Neighbourhood streets Neighbourhood connector streets spaced 800m grid Neighbourhood main streets in centres Rear lanes
Block sizes P4: length 130–200m Depth 50–80m
P5: length 130–180m Depth 70–100m
(Provisions for) Acceptable outcomes
78
Walkable neighbourhood structure
Street network
79
Housing Choice and other uses
Density P4: 15-30du/ha
P5: 30-100+ du/ha
Applicable zones
P4 (see Page 81)Residential choiceResidential livingNeighbourhood centreOpen spaceCommunity purposes
OtherLocal centre
P5 (see Page 82)Residential choiceApartment livingLocal centreOpen spaceCommunity purposes
OtherNeighbourhood centreDistrict centre
Levels of assessment (mcu) for housing choice
See table (Page 80)
Dwelling location
See lot mix diagram (Page 80)
Neighbourhood scale module (cont.)
(Provisions for) Acceptable outcomes
80
QPP zone Det
ach
ed o
n
wid
er lo
t
Det
ach
ed o
n
nar
row
lot
Du
ple
x
Sm
all m
ult
iple
d
wel
ling
s
Row
ho
use
Live
/wo
rk
bu
ildin
g
Sec
on
dar
y d
wel
ling
Low
ris
e ap
artm
ents
Med
ium
/hig
h
rise
ap
artm
ents
Residential living E / S E / S E / S S C C S C I
Residential choice E / S E / S E / S S S / C C S C I
Apartment residential E / S E / S E / S S C C S C C / I
Neighbourhood centre E / S E / S E / S S C C S C C / I
Local centre E / S E / S E / S S C C S C C / I
E Exempt development C Code assessment
S Self assessment I Impact assessment
Lot mix diagram
Level of assessment table
The suggested levels of assessment in this table will be subject to consideration by local government of the perceived level of risk and potential impacts of development, particularly where there are risks arising from the land’s physical characteristics and location (for example if land is steep or flood affected)
81
QPP zoning applied to a Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhood (P4)
This Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhood example provides for a wide housing area mostly within a five minute walkable catchment around a centre focus and more intense housing and mixed use.
While it includes a substantial area of the Residential Living Zone, this doesn’t mean a predominance of detached dwellings, as this zone intends to carry a range of housing. While there would be many detached dwellings in those areas, there would also be other forms of houses, such as dual occupancies, plexes and row houses as detailed in Section 5.1.
Neighbourhood centre Neighbourhood centre zones are at the junctions of the primary through streets and public transport routes in an accessible and visible locations. Where streets are busy, they are generally to the side of the intersection creating pedestrian focussed ‘main street’ environments.
Residential choiceResidential choice zones are located along through streets, along busier local streets that lead to the centre and around local parks.
Residential livingResidential living zones are located towards the edge of the walkable catchment, beyond the 250 m radius (three minute walk, inner circle shown).
Schools/community purposesCommunity facilities are placed in accessible locations on the busier local streets on the edges of the walkable catchment.
Neighbourhood scale module (cont.)Zoning
82
District centre Centres are located at the junction of through streets and public transport routes in accessible and visible locations generally to the side of the intersection creating pedestrian focussed ‘main street’ environments.
Apartment residentialApartment residential zones are located close to centres within 250 m and along busier local streets that lead directly to the centre, local parks and green corridors (where available).
Residential choice Residential choice zones are located between 250–400 m from the centre towards the edge of the walkable catchments.
QPP zoning applied to an Urban Neighbourhood (P5)
This Urban Neighbourhood example provides for higher density housing mostly within a five minute walkable catchment of a centre with more apartment housing and diverse mixed use development surrounding it.
While it still includes some areas of Residential Living Zone, there would be many other forms of houses, such as dual occupancies, plexes, row houses and possibly low rise apartments, as detailed in Section 5.1.
Street scale
7.0
The design of streets is critical in supporting walkable neighbourhoods. Streets should be designed as places for people and movement. The range of street types detailed in this module includes neighbourhood connectors or main streets, neighbourhood streets and rear lanes. Specific guidance is provided on function and use, reserve widths, parking, intersections and design detail.
Exemplar performance outcomes are provided, along with ‘provisions for Acceptable outcomes’ in the form of tables and drawings.
The content provided herein is exemplar and will require further development and adaptation to suit individual planning scheme requirements.
This part of the Planning scheme modules includes:
7.1 Street scale module
85
Street scale module
Overall outcomes or purpose statementDevelopment results in well designed streets supporting walkable communities; streets are attractive and vital, forming liveable and identifiable places; design of streets provides safe and environmentally healthy environments; streets are cost effective and support affordable living.
Performance outcomes
1. Street design supports sustainable urban form founded on walkable neighbourhoods. Street design:
- Is appropriate to the function(s) of the street. Common street functions include:
- access to properties,
- parking,
- utilities and services,
- biodiversity,
- placemaking and
- movement.
- Relative importance of these functions is not equal and should be weighted accordingly
- Meets the needs of all users, and
- Gives priority to the needs of vulnerable users. Typical street users in order of vulnerability and importance are:
- pedestrians,
- cyclists,
- public transport,
- service vehicles,
- private cars.
2. Street design contributes to placemaking through:
- Detailed design including footpaths, trees and planting, kerbs, lighting, seating and other elements collectively contributes to a quality public realm and streetscape, and
- Appropriate scale and form to the existing or expected neighbouring buildings
- Street design is appropriate to place type
Neighbourhood main street and neighbourhood connector street
Use if Connecting neighbourhood destinations including shops and parks, and accessing the road network. Bus and trunk cycling route.
Reserve 23-24m (avenue) 24-29m (boulevard)
Movement 6-7m carriageway (avenue) 2 x 3-3.5m carriageway (boulevard) 2 x 1.5m cycle lanes 2 footpaths
Parking 2.5m parking / planting
Design detail Street trees. Planting, seating and features as appropriate. Stand-up kerb.
*Note: All sections scale 1:250
3. Safety and convenience of street users is maximised through street design
4. Streets are cost effective to build and maintain, including carriageways of a minimum comfortable width to allow for sufficient on street car parking and efficient vehicle passing.
(Provisions for) Acceptable outcomes
86
Neighbourhood connector or main street (boulevard)
Neighbourhood connector or main street (avenue)
87
Neighbourhood street 5.5
Use if Density: 15-30dph driveways: frequent connectivity: high
Use if Density: 30dph+ Driveways: infrequent Connectivity: low
Reserve 14-15m
Movement 5.5-6m carriageway 1 or 2 footpaths
Parking One side
Intersections 4-Way or T 3-6m kerb radii
Design detail Street trees closely spaced to prevent vehicles driving on footpaths Roll-over kerb
Neighbourhood street 7.5
Use if Density: 15-30dph or 30dph+ driveways: frequent connectivity: high
Reserve 14-15m
Movement 7.5m carriageway 2 footpaths
Parking Both sides
Intersections 4-Way or T 3m kerb radii
Design detail Street trees Stand-up kerb
88
Neighbourhood street 3.5
Use if Density: 15-30dph Driveways: infrequent Connectivity: low
Reserve 9.5-13m
Movement 3.5m carriageway with passing 0 footpaths
Parking 2.5m parking/planting
Intersections 4-Way or T 3-6m kerb radii
Design detail Street trees
Rear lane
Function and use
Access to properties, refuge collection and servicing only
Reserve 6m (0.5-1m setback to buildings)
Movement 5m carriageway
Parking N/a
Design detail Minimal embellishment Flush kerb
Lot and building scale
8.0
At the lot and building scale, modules for a range of housing types contribute to affordable living through guidance on housing types that considers dwelling size and construction maintenence in an economical way. Housing designs allow for future extension and modifications for cater for changing needs. Guidance is expressed in form based codes with an emphasis on the physical form and the use of graphics to clearly articulate housing scale and bulk. Lot types are arranged by frontage widths taking account of the critical relationship of the building form to the street environment.
Exemplar performance outcomes are provided, along with ‘provisions for Acceptable outcomes’ in the form of tables and drawings.
The content provided herein is exemplar and will require further development and adaptation to suit individual planning scheme requirements. Other exemplar modules may be added over time. This part of the planning scheme modules includes:
8.1 Detached houses on wide lots 8.2 Detached housing on narrow lots 8.3 Duplex8.4 The ‘plexes’ – triplex, quadplex, quinplex8.5 Row house or terrace house8.6 Live/work (dual street frontage)8.7 Low rise apartments 8.8 Medium and high rise apartment 8.9 Secondary dwelling (granny flat and Fonzie flat)8.10 Consistent lot types
91
Performance outcomes for lot and building scale
Overall outcomes or purpose statementDevelopment supports affordable living for residents, provides a liveable residential environment, and contributes to community liveability and sustainability.
Performance outcomes
1. Development is designed to support affordable living by means of: - economical dwelling size and
construction,
- efficient use of land,
- low maintenance costs,
- access to natural light, ventilation and heating,
- adaptability for future extension and modification,
- cost-effective transport options.
2. Development provides a liveable residential environment. Site and building design provides: - comfortable indoor and outdoor
environments including access to views, light, breezes and shade for residents and neighbours,
- areas for outdoor clothes drying,
- private outdoor space suitable for passive adult recreation, swimming pools and/or active children’s play,
- areas for landscaping allowing for shade, decoration and (supplementary) food production,
- off-street parking for vehicles and bicycles.
92
3. Development contributes to community liveability. Site and building design contributes to an attractive, comfortable and safe public realm by: - maximising safety and amenity including
the impact of car parking and driveways on the street,
- maintaining visual privacy for residents,
- contributing to a quality streetscape including human scale enclosure through placement of buildings, retaining walls, landscaping and fencing.
- taking into consideration the potential impacts on personal safety of natural hazards including bushfire, floods and landslides.
4. Development contributes to community sustainability. Site and building design contributes to: - local biodiversity by providing
landscaped areas,
- healthy waters through water sensitive urban design,
- minimised need for energy intensive cooling, heating, drying and lighting.
93
QPP description: dwelling house on 20 m wide lots
Detached houses on wide lots
Dwelling houses on 20 m wide lots are detached houses common in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4). The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes in Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and building massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development. A further illustration of the desired form of this development is below.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover 50% maximum
Private open space (minimum)
Area of 50m2 with 6m dimension. May be inclusive of verandahs and terraces. Located north or east of primary habitable rooms and outdoor terraces
Setbacks (all minimum to wall unless stated)
Front setback
- To verandah 2m
- To house wall 4m
- To garage 6m; and 2m behind house wall
Rear setback 6m
Rear setback (to lane)
1m ground storey 0.5m upper storeys
Side setback
- To south or west boundary
3m
- To street 2m
- Otherwise 2m
Building height
1, 2 or 3 storeys 8.5m maximum or 10m maximum on slopes >15%
Parking 2 covered spaces
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door is visible and accessible from the street
Street surveillance
Minimum 1 habitable room overlooks the street
Fencing (streetfront)
1.2m height
Fencing (other) 1.2-1.8m height. 50% transparency over 1.2m
Verandahs 50% building frontage
Planting Minimum 2x2m planted area between front boundary and dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction External retaining maximum 1m height
(Provisions for) acceptable outcomes
94
Developable Area
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/ParkingScale 1:500
95
QPP description: dwelling house on 10 m, 12.5 m and 15 m wide lots
Detached houses on narrow lots
Dwelling houses on 10 m, 12.5 m and 15 m wide lots are detached houses designed for narrow allotments. This dwelling type is common in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4) and Urban Neighbourhoods (P5). The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes in Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and building massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development. A further illustration of the desired form of this development is below.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover 50% maximum
Private open space (minimum)
Area of 50m2 with 6m dimension. May be inclusive of verandahs and terrace. Located north or east of primary habitable rooms and outdoor terraces
Setbacks All minimum to wall unless stated
Front setback
- To verandah 1m
- To house wall 3m
- To garage 4.5m
Rear setback 6m
Rear setback (to lane)
1m ground storey 0.5m upper storeys
Side setback
- To south or west boundary
0m lot for garage and non-habitable rooms with a 12m maximum wall length
- To street 0m for elevated floors, otherwise 1.5m
- Otherwise 1m
Building height
1, 2 or 3 storeys 8.5m maximum or 10m maximum on slopes >15%
Parking 1 covered space Double garage only if 2 or 3 storey or to Rear lane
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door is visible and accessible from the street
Street surveillance
Minimum 1 habitable room overlooks the street
Fencing (streetfront)
1.2m height
Fencing (other) 1.2-1.8m height 50% transparency over 1.2m
Verandahs 50% building frontage
Planting Minimum 1x2m planted area between front boundary and dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction External retaining maximum 1m height
(Provisions for) acceptable outcomes
96
Scale 1:500
Developable Area
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/Parking
97
QPP description: dual occupancy or dwelling houses
Duplex
In SEQ ‘duplex’ typically refers to two dwellings, sharing a common wall and sited on the same lot. Other configurations are possible. The dwellings could sit above and below each other. Alternatively, it could be the semi-detached house for each dwelling, two dwellings on separate lots but with abutting walls.
Duplexes are common in Next Generation Suburban Neighbourhoods (P4) and particularly on corner sites. The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes in Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and building massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development. A further illustration of the desired form of this development is below.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover 60% maximum
Private open space (minimum)
Area of 30m2 with 4m dimension. May be inclusive of verandahs and terraces. Located north or east of primary habitable rooms and outdoor terraces
Setbacks (all minimum to wall unless stated)
Front setback
- To verandah 1m
- To house wall 3m
- To garage 4.5m
Rear setback 4.5m
Rear setback (to lane)
1m ground storey 0.5m upper storeys
Side setback 1m
Building height
1, 2 or 3 storeys. 8.5m maximum or 10m maximum on slopes >15%
Parking 1 covered space per dwelling Double garage only if 2 or 3 storey or to Rear lane
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door for each dwelling, visible and accessible from the street
Street surveillance
Minimum 1 habitable room per dwelling overlooks the street
Fencing (streetfront)
1.2m height
Fencing (other) 1.2 - 1.8m height. 50% transparency over 1.2m
Verandahs 50% building frontage
Planting Minimum 1x2m planted area per dwelling, between front boundary and dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction. External retaining maximum 1m height.
(Provisions for) acceptable outcomes
98
Scale 1:500
Developable Area
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/Parking
99
QPP description: multiple dwellings – 3 to 5 dwelling units
The ‘plexes’ (triplex, quadplex, quinplex)
Small multiple dwelling buildings are part of a diverse mix of housing choice and are located on corner sites, where possible. Their design is highly variable, and related to the site size and shape, and development economics.
The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes in Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and building massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development. A further illustration of the desired form of this development is below.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover 60% maximum
Private open space (minimum per dwelling)
Area of 30m2 with 4m dimension. May be inclusive of verandahs and terraces. Located north or east of primary habitable rooms and outdoor terraces
Setbacks (all minimum to wall unless stated)
Front setback
- To verandah 1m
- To house wall 3m
- To garage 4.5m
Rear setback 4.5m
Rear setback (to lane)
1m ground storey 0.5m upper storeys
Side setback 2m
Building height
1, 2 or 3 storeys 8.5m maximum or 10m maximum on slopes >15%
Parking 1 covered space per dwelling Double garage only if 2 or 3 storey or to Rear Lane Shared driveways where possible
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door for each dwelling, visible and accessible from the street
Street surveillance
Minimum 1 habitable room per dwelling overlooks the street
Fencing (streetfront)
1.2m height
Fencing (other) 1.2-1.8m height 50% transparency over 1.2m
Verandahs 50% building frontage
Planting Minimum 1x2m planted area per dwelling, between front boundary and dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction. External retaining maximum 1m height.
(Provisions for) acceptable outcomes
100
Scale 1:500
Developable Area
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/Parking
101
QPP description: dwelling house or dwelling unit or multiple dwelling
Row house or terrace house
Row Houses are part of a diverse mix of housing choices. Often Row houses are built as an integrated development and are sited on one lot, but they can be sited on individual lots. The best streetscape outcome is achieved when Row Houses are located on lots with a Rear Lane, and no more than five houses in a row should be joined.
The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes in Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and building massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development. A further illustration of the desired form of this development is below.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover 70% maximum
Private open space (minimum)
Area of 30m2 with 4m dimension (per dwelling) at rear of dwelling
Setbacks (all minimum to wall unless stated)
Front setback
- To verandah 1m
- To house wall 3m
Rear setback (to lane)
1m ground storey 0.5m upper storeys
Side setback 1m
Building height
1, 2 or 3 storeys 8.5m maximum or 10m maximum on slopes >15%
Parking 1 or 2 covered spaces per dwelling from Rear lane
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door for each dwelling, visible and accessible from the street
Street surveillance
Minimum 1 habitable room per dwelling overlooks the street
Fencing (streetfront)
1.2m height
Fencing (other) 1.2-1.8m height 50% transparency over 1.2m
Verandahs 100% building frontage
Planting Minimum 1x2m planted area per dwelling, between front boundary and dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction. External retaining maximum 1m height
(Provisions for) acceptable outcomes
102
Scale 1:500
Developable Area
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/Parking
103
QPP description: home based business
Live/work (dual street frontage)
Live/work buildings are a specific built form that incorporates an office or shop or workshop into a building that also contains a home. They are useful in locations on the fringe of centres or emerging centres where they can provide a transition between residential and commercial or retail areas. Typically this building types takes advantage of a rear lane or dual street frontage. Live/work Buildings are designed for a greater level of visitor interaction than ‘working from home’, which can be undertaken in most dwelling types.
The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes in Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and building massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover 70% maximum
Private open space (minimum)
Area of 30m2 with 4m dimension between the house and work unit. May be inclusive of verandahs and terraces. Located north or east of primary habitable rooms and outdoor terraces
Setbacks (all minimum to wall unless stated)
Front setback
- To verandah 1m
- To house wall 3m
- To garage 4.5m
Rear setback (to lane or carpark)
1m ground storey 0.5m upper storeys
Side setback 1m
Building height
1, 2 or 3 storeys 8.5m maximum or 10m maximum on slopes >15%
Parking 1 or 2 covered spaces per dwelling
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door for dwelling and work unit, visible and accessible from the street
Street surveillance
Minimum 1 habitable room overlooks the street
Fencing (streetfront)
1.2m height
Fencing (other) 1.2-1.8m height 50% transparency over 1.2m
Verandahs 50% building frontage
Planting Minimum 1x2m planted area, between front boundary and dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction. External retaining maximum 1m height
(Provisions for) acceptable outcomes
104
Scale 1:500
Developable Area
Live/work
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/Parking
105
QPP description: multiple dwellings
Low rise apartments
Low rise apartments are up to three storeys in height and contribute to achieving a greater mix of housing types and a more compact urban form.
The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes in Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development. A further illustration of the desired form of this development is below.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover 60% maximum
Private open space (minimum per dwelling)
Area of 16m2 verandah/balcony. Per dwelling plus area of 50m2 ground level shared open space. Located north or east of primary habitable rooms and outdoor terraces
Setbacks (all minimum to wall unless stated)
Front setback
- To verandah 2m
- To house wall 4m
- To garage n/a
Rear setback 6m
Rear setback (to lane)
6m
Side setback 3m
Building height
3 storeys max
Parking 0.5–1.25 per dwelling dependent on location. See TOD Guidelines
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door, visible and accessible from the street
Street surveillance
Ground floor apartments have direct entry to the street. Multiple habitable rooms overlooks the street
Fencing (streetfront)
1.2m height
Fencing (other) 1.2-1.8m height 50% transparency over 1.2m
Verandahs 50% building frontage
Planting Minimum 1m wide planted area for length of frontage, between front boundary and dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction. External retaining maximum 1m height
(Provisions for) acceptable outcomes
106
Scale 1:500
Developable Area
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/Parking
107
QPP description: multiple dwellings
Medium and high rise apartments
Medium and high rise apartments contribute to achieving a greater mix of housing types and a more compact urban form.
As this type of building takes a wide range of forms, only general guidance is provided here for consideration in drafting relevant codes.
Site planning and building massing
Parking Semi-basement or basement
Orientation Allow for cross ventilation, natural lighting and solar access
Setbacks Relative to height of building, width of street and front boundary treatment
Open space Access require to private, communal and public open space
Ground level uses
Accommodate retail or commercial spaces on ground floor where located on neighourhood connector or main streets with high accessibility and pedestrian activity
Overshadowing Reduce overshadowing of street by using towers above broad podiums
Developable Area
Verandah
Deep Planting/Landscaping
Vehicle/Parking
108
Scale 1:500
109
QPP description: dual occupancy - secondary dwellings
Secondary dwellings (granny and Fonzie flats)
Secondary dwellings contained on the same lots as another dwelling provide flexible low cost housing options. Granny flats are typically incorporated inside the building of the primary dwelling, whether under or over or on the side. They may be housed in a separate structure. Fonzie flats are a small dwelling sited above a garage, typically on a rear lane or side street.
Secondary dwellings are common in Next Generation Neighbourhoods (P4) and Urban Neighbourhoods (P5), found with detached houses of various sizes, and row houses. The table and figure to the right indicate site and building design characteristics to achieve the performance outcomes Section 8.1.
Generally, site planning and massing relate to performance outcomes for affordable living and liveable residential environments. Streetscape provisions mostly relate to community liveability and community sustainability.
Use this information to draft codes for self-assessable or assessable development.
Site planning and building massing
Site cover Within site cover for primary dwelling
Private open space
Exclusive area of 16m2. Located north or east of primary habitable rooms and outdoor terraces
Setbacks As for primary dwelling
Building height
As for primary dwelling
Parking 1 covered space for secondary dwelling Shared driveway with primary dwelling
Streetscape
Front entry Dedicated pedestrian entry and door for each dwelling, accessible from the street or rear lane
Fencing As for primary dwelling
Verandahs, windows and façade articulation
50% building frontage
Planting As for primary dwelling
Slope Elevated or split-level construction External retaining maximum 1m height
110
QPP description: reconfiguring a lot
Consistent lot types
Consistent lot types are preferred to accommodate the housing types and choice advocated by this handbook. Lot types are of a consistent width to achieve a more efficient use of land, infrastructure provision, and regular house design. The figure below indicate the lot dimenstion suitable for the housig types in this handbook. Use this information to draft codes for reconfiguring a lot.