New Public Managemen_summary

download New Public Managemen_summary

of 22

Transcript of New Public Managemen_summary

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    1/22

    New Public

    Management

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    2/22

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    3/22

    Day One, Session Four, pm.

    NPM as an ideology

    Legitimating NPM

    Clarke & Newman, 1997, argue that the New Right havepushed NPM as better than other systems

    The New Right argument

    Bureaucracy is: rule bound, inward looking, compliancecentre, ossified.

    Management is: innovative, externally oriented,performance centred, dynamic

    Professional is: paternalist, mystique ridden, standardoriented, self regulating.

    Management is: customer centred, transparent, resultsoriented, market tested.

    Clarke & Newman, 1997, page 65

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    4/22

    Day One, Session Four, pm.

    NPM - Christopher Hood

    One of the first writers to use the term NPM

    Linked it to the Thatcherite drive with the three Es:Economy, Effectiveness, Efficiency.

    Central Doctrines Focus on management, not policy

    Break-up of public bureaucracies

    Contracting out

    Competition Monetary incentives

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    5/22

    Day One, Session Four, pm.

    Pollit, Christopher

    Also concerned with the weaknesses inNPM

    He wrote of its preoccupation with simply

    traditional and classical approaches But Pollit recognised that the growth of

    managerialism in the public sectorbegan pre Thatcher, under Wilson andHeath

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    6/22

    Day One, Session Four, pm.

    The argument for NPM

    Most entrepreneurial governments promotecompetition between service providers. Theyempower citizens by pushing control out ofbureaucracy into the community. They measure

    performance of their agenciesThey are driven bygoalsnot by rules. They redefine their clients ascustomers and offer them choices.

    Osbourne & Gaebler, 1992, p.20

    Osbourne & Gaebler advocated a theory in theUSA called Reinventing Government. It was veryinfluential and is similar in characteristics to theNPM.

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    7/22

    Day One, Session Four, pm.

    Conclusions on NPM

    Hughes (1998) states the following weaknesses ofNPM: its economic base, private sectorbackground, neo taylorism, politicalisation ofbureaucracy, reduced accountability,

    implementation, abstract concepts.But he also says: the old model did not work

    anymore. p.20

    As a consequence we can see a trend towardsmajor social contradictions and conflicts beingexperienced at the front line of service delivery.Clarke & Newman, p.159

    The Conservatives succeeded in redrawing theboundaries of the state, substituting markets for

    politics in the allocation of resources andmodelling the remaining public sector on private

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    8/22

    Reinventing Government the New PublicManagement

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    9/22

    Reinvention

    An effort to improve quality andproductivity

    Requires increased entrepreneurship

    An entrepreneurial government is...

    Streamlined

    Flexible

    Responsive

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    10/22

    Principles of a reinventedGovernment

    Catalytic steer (recognize options) dont row (singleobjective)

    Community-owned (empower, dont just serve)

    Competitive with private enterprise

    Mission- and customer-driven, results oriented

    Anticipatory (prevent, dont cure)

    Decentralized (participation and teamwork)

    Market-oriented

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    11/22

    Issues

    Do the differences between the goals of businesses andgovernment agencies create fundamentally differentincentives?

    Should market forces drive public organizations? Should economic principles be paramount?

    Is administrative efficiency an appropriate goal?

    Measuring productivity

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    12/22

    Federal productivityprograms

    OMB Office of Management and Budget (Executive Office of

    the President)

    Goals:

    Improve Federal financial management

    Reduce fraud, waste and abuse

    Privatize where possible

    Encourage use of new technologies

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/
  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    13/22

    1993 GPRA Government Performance

    National Performance Review and National Partnershipfor Reinventing Government

    Cut red tape, reduce size of Federal government, putcustomers first and empower employees

    Federal agencies had to: Develop strategic plans and measures of

    performance Produce annual performance plans and reports

    (1998 GAO evaluation of agency compliance -

    Justice Dept. example) One thing that was accomplished the Federal workforce

    was reduced by more than 300,000 employees

    http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/http://www.gao.gov/new.items/gpra/gg98134r.pdfhttp://www.gao.gov/new.items/gpra/gg98134r.pdfhttp://www.gao.gov/new.items/gpra/gg98134r.pdfhttp://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/
  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    14/22

    Quality of life issues

    Compensation

    Working conditions

    Worker opportunity for growth

    Autonomy Responsibility

    Authority

    Social relevance Balancing personal life

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    15/22

    Job Enrichment

    Better performance through:

    Task diversity

    Autonomy

    Clear feedback on performance

    Methods

    Expanded work / team work

    Vertical loading (devolve managementresponsibilities to workers)

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    16/22

    Result: The newmanagement

    Some common precepts and buzzwords:

    Clearly defined goals and objectives

    Simple structure, lean staff

    Precise measures of output

    Just in time

    Loose and tight: central direction coexists with individualautonomy

    Stick to what you know- avoid excessive diversification Customer service / customer orientation

    Employee empowerment - those closest to the task should knowthe most

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    17/22

    Techniques to implement thenew management fads or

    helpful tools?

    Management by Objectives (MBO)

    Quality Circles

    Organization Development (OD)

    Total Quality Management (TQM)

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    18/22

    Management by Objectives

    Top develops broad goals

    Rest of organization develops objectives and sets performance

    criteria

    Performance criteria can be amount of work, quality ofwork, effectiveness of work, timely completion, and costs

    Requires lots of time, effort and paperwork to implement

    May be a sneaky way to ramp up production

    Best applicable when output is quantifiable Application can promote cynicism throughout the workplace

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    19/22

    Quality circles

    Small groups that meet to identify and solve workplaceissues

    Requires support of top management

    Care not to cut out middle managers(recommendations still go through chain)

    Requires training group members in decision-makingtechniques

    Groups may ask for resources that are unavailable Results may not benefit the employers bottom line

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    20/22

    Total Quality Management(TQM)

    Emphasis on quality service, customer orientation and

    program excellence

    Employee involvement

    Enhanced communications

    Standards and measures

    Extensive training and recognition

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    21/22

    Difficulties in implementation Resistance to change and to participatory management

    Lack of funding

    Lack of knowledge

    Personnel regulations

    Lack of attention and support from senior managers

    Like psychoanalysis feels good but absence ofmeasurable gains over the short term

  • 7/31/2019 New Public Managemen_summary

    22/22

    Benchmarking and BestPractices

    Survey experts and academics to identify like agencies

    and programs with excellent reputations

    Visit them examine how they work

    Input-process-output

    Work processes, personnel practices, performance standards

    and measures

    Develop benchmarks for local use

    So obvious it may not require management experts

    Same solutions not applicable everywhere