Near-misses in sample collection and in blood component ... · Near-misses in sample collection and...
Transcript of Near-misses in sample collection and in blood component ... · Near-misses in sample collection and...
Near-misses in sample collection and in bloodcomponent transfusion. An incidence study
using an electronic transfusion safety system
1
Dr. José-Luis Bueno Hematology and Hemotherapy Department
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (Madrid)
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
• Grifols– Consultancy
– Honoraria
• Janssen– Consultancy
– Honoraria
• PRoPosit– CEO
– Medical Director
• Sanofi– Consultancy– Honoraria– Medical writting– Advisory Committees
• Onega+– Consultancy
I hereby declare the following potential conflicts of interest concerning
my presentation:
4
Errors ocurring during transfusion
of a blood component
ABO incompatible
transfusion
Death as result of an incorrect
blood component transfusion
5
• SHOT 1996-2003
• Risk of an error ocurring during transfusion of a blood component 1:16.500
• Risk of an ABO incompatible transfusion 1:100.000
• Risk of a death as result of an incorrect blood component transfusion 1:1.500.000
Transfusion with unknown donor and recipentABO typing, in caucasian matchs in around 63%
A NEG, 6.83%
A POS, 36.80%
AB NEG, 0.55%
AB POS, 3.20%
B NEG, 1.29%B POS, 8.25%
O NEG, 6.26%
O POS, 36.82%
1 ABO Hemolitic Transfusion reaction
Near-misses
2 asintomatic ABO errors
10136
12172
13897
1508114610
12914 1316013690
1443613461
4138 4543 4141 4466 46933348 3556
3494
36472516
13461906
2718 2962 27982259
3211
2943 2798 2929
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
year2008
year2009
year2010
year2011
year2012
year2013
year2014
year2015
year2016
year2017
Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda Hospital. Transfusions 2008-2017
RBCs
Plasma units
Platelet units
-7,3
20.881 18.906
Blood sample verification. Before 2013
Second blood sample
collection in new patient
ABO Rh checking against
previous record
Blood sample verification. Before 2013
Second blood sample collection in new patient
Bed-side verification. Before 2013
“Wet test” blood group checking in the bedside
Bed-side verification. Before 2013
“Wet test” blood group checking in the bedside
13
135 events/ 123941 transfusions
10,9 events/ 10.000 transfusions
Hemovigilance between 2010 y 2012 HUPHM
RBC % PLT % FFP % Total
HTR (ABO) 4 0,9 0 0,0 0 0,0 4 0,6
Febrile or hypotensive non hemolytic 37 8,5 4 4,7 1 0,8 42 6,4
Allergic 5 1,1 3 3,5 25 18,8 33 5,0
TRALI/TACO 0 0,0 0 0,0 0 0,0 0 0,0
Bacterial Contamination 1 0,2 0 0,0 0 0,0 1 0,2
Near miss 1 0,2 0 0,0 0 0,0 2 0,3
Total 4811,
0 7 8,3 26 19,5 81 12,4
Units transfused4358
8 8478 13300 65366
By 10.000 11,0 8,3 19,5 12,4
Haemovigilance Report 2010-2012
14
1 ABO error per 11.000 units transfused
ERRORS
Near-misses
Blood sample verification
16
Blood-Bank verification
Bed-side patient and blood
component checking
USERDATE TIME WARD BLOOD COMPT. CORRECT?PATIENT
Gricode web based software
Objective
Define the incidence of near-misses in thesample collection and in the blood componentstransfusion using our electronic safety system
Methods
• Observational, retrospective, one-center study
• Near-misses incidence in sample collection and blood components transfusion
• Years 2014-2017
• Analysis by year, time, nurse shift, ward, operator
Near-misses in SC & BCT 2014-2017
Number of checkingsperformed
Missmatches(Near-misses)
Near-missespercent
Blood samplecollections
55.636 1.995 3,59%
Beginning of transfusions
81.168* 548 0,67%
Blood sample collection
21
3.05%
2.21%2.58% 2.53%
6.88%
8.09%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Blood sample collection near-misses,
per year
0001- 713 22 3,09%
0002- 1041 72 6,92%
0003- 41 4 9,76%
0004- 1006 37 3,68%
0005- 1709 70 4,10%
0006- 5311 59 1,11%
0010- 11380 446 3,92%
0011- 1109 66 5,95%
0012- 1279 60 4,69%
0013- 338 49 14,50%
0014- 388 18 4,64%
HDD Qx 8340 61 0,73%
Blood sample collection near-misses per ward2014-2017
Ward Checkings Miss-matches Miss-matches %
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Miss-matches percent per hour
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Sample collections per hour, number
Blood sample collection near-misses per hour and nurse shift2014-2017
25
Beginning of transfusion
2.74%
0.70% 0.64%
0.40%
0.89%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Beginning of transfusion near-misses,
per year
Beginning of transfusions, per hour and nurse shift2014-2017
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Beginning of transfusions, per hour and nurse shift, percent
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Beginning of transfusions, per hour and nurse shift, number
Acute transfusion reactions2010- 2017
28
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
YEAR 2010 YEAR 2011 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2013 YEAR 2014 YEAR 2015 YEAR 2016 YEAR 2017
AHTR-ABO (ERRORS) ATR-NON ABO FEBRILE DIGESTIVE ALLERGIC PULMONARY BACT SEPSIS
Pasive Hemovigilance Active &
Quarantine H
Retrospective
Active HV
Transfusional
Safety System
Conclusions
• Electronic Transfusion safety systems are able to reduce errors
• Also, knowing real near-misses events rates
• Knowing who, when and where these rates are high
Future stategies to improve transfusional safety
• Directed training and re- training follow-up
• Prohibiting transfusion to no well trained staff
• Reschudeling not urgent transfusion out of dangerous shifts
Thanks….