NC Structurally deficient Bridges report

2
© 2015 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Highlights from FHWA’s 2014 National Bridge Inventory Data: Of the 18,117 bridges in the state, 2,199 bridges, or 12% are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition. 1 There are 3,135 bridges, or 17% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice. State and local contract awards for bridge construction totaled $2.44 billion over the past five years, 27 percent of highway and bridge contract awards, compared to a national average of 29 percent. Since 2004, 2,175 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 138 bridges have undergone major reconstruction. The state estimates that it would cost approximately $30.0 million to fix a total of 7,066 bridges in the state. 2 Bridge Inventory: All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges Type of Bridge Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Rural Bridges Interstate 448 352,163 9,390,850 14 21,996 321,000 Other principal arterial 978 1,101,787 9,693,293 50 89,082 586,100 Minor arterial 661 483,466 4,259,390 64 126,542 337,840 Major collector 1,974 1,037,248 6,770,181 217 216,704 724,155 Minor collector 1,588 502,744 2,701,178 251 60,226 378,562 Local 7,453 1,426,984 4,793,963 1,192 182,618 660,750 Urban Bridges Interstate 741 1,061,436 28,943,983 24 20,958 864,000 Other freeway 540 820,914 12,372,522 43 61,864 1,302,300 Principal arterial 730 726,076 13,266,125 56 58,495 824,850 Minor arterial 839 693,170 9,804,740 62 62,355 582,410 Collector 600 379,950 3,784,540 70 31,545 366,200 Rural 1,565 548,186 6,339,766 156 44,945 493,499 Total 18,117 9,134,125 112,120,531 2,199 977,330 7,441,666 1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs. State Bridge Profile North Carolina

description

A look at the report on North Carolina bridges.

Transcript of NC Structurally deficient Bridges report

Page 1: NC Structurally deficient Bridges report

© 2015 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA.

Highlights from FHWA’s 2014 National Bridge Inventory Data:

Of the 18,117 bridges in the state, 2,199 bridges, or 12% are classified as structurally deficient.

This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or

substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1

There are 3,135 bridges, or 17% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This

means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.

State and local contract awards for bridge construction totaled $2.44 billion over the past five

years, 27 percent of highway and bridge contract awards, compared to a national average of 29

percent.

Since 2004, 2,175 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 138 bridges have

undergone major reconstruction.

The state estimates that it would cost approximately $30.0 million to fix a total of 7,066 bridges

in the state.2

Bridge Inventory:

All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges

Type of Bridge Total

Number Area (sq. meters)

Daily Crossings

Total Number

Area (sq. meters)

Daily Crossings

Rural Bridges

Interstate 448 352,163 9,390,850 14 21,996 321,000

Other principal arterial 978 1,101,787 9,693,293 50 89,082 586,100

Minor arterial 661 483,466 4,259,390 64 126,542 337,840

Major collector 1,974 1,037,248 6,770,181 217 216,704 724,155

Minor collector 1,588 502,744 2,701,178 251 60,226 378,562

Local 7,453 1,426,984 4,793,963 1,192 182,618 660,750

Urban Bridges

Interstate 741 1,061,436 28,943,983 24 20,958 864,000

Other freeway 540 820,914 12,372,522 43 61,864 1,302,300

Principal arterial 730 726,076 13,266,125 56 58,495 824,850

Minor arterial 839 693,170 9,804,740 62 62,355 582,410

Collector 600 379,950 3,784,540 70 31,545 366,200

Rural 1,565 548,186 6,339,766 156 44,945 493,499

Total 18,117 9,134,125 112,120,531 2,199 977,330 7,441,666

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs.

State Bridge Profile

North Carolina

Page 2: NC Structurally deficient Bridges report

© 2015 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA.

Proposed bridge work:

Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters)

Bridge replacement 1,854 $5.1 5,199,694 770,426

Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0.0 0 0

Rehabilitation 5,065 $12.2 31,927,324 2,688,064

Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0.0 0 0

Other work 147 $12.6 145,145 66,735

Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State:

County Year Built

Daily Crossings

Type of Bridge Location

Guilford 1955 123,000 Urban Interstate I-40 and I-85 BUS. over the South Buffalo Creek (Greensboro Bridge)

Forsyth 1963 81,000 Urban

freeway/expressway US-52 and US-311 over US-311

Mecklenburg 1967 72,000 Urban Interstate US-52 over 28th Street

Forsyth 1964 72,000 Urban

freeway/expressway US-52 over 25th Street

Forsyth 1955 72,000 Urban

freeway/expressway I-277 and NC-1 over Brevard Street

Forsyth 1964 72,000 Urban

freeway/expressway I-40 BUS over SR 4315 (Liberty Street)

Forsyth 1960 71,000 Urban

freeway/expressway US-421 over Little Creek

Forsyth 1971 59,000 Urban

freeway/expressway US-52/US-311/NC-8 over Diggs Boulevard

Forsyth 1971 56,000 Urban

freeway/expressway US-52/US-311/NC-8 over I-40 and US-311

Buncombe 1970 55,000 Urban

freeway/expressway US-19 23 70 over NC-251

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015.

Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as

part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state

and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other

contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total

in this profile.