Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne Khayat Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber

18
Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne Khayat Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber 2014 UIA Florence

description

2014 UIA Florence. Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne Khayat Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber. ROADMAP. General Exclusive dealing (Non-complete obligations, Exclusive Supply clauses) Pricing (Price fixing and price recommendations) Use of the internet - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne Khayat Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber

Page 1: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

Navigating the competition law

aspects of franchising

Corinne Khayat Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber

2014 UIA Florence

Page 2: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

ROADMAP

• General

• Exclusive dealing (Non-complete obligations, Exclusive Supply clauses)

• Pricing (Price fixing and price recommendations)

• Use of the internet

• Post-term non-compete obligations

• Preferential and preemption rights

l 2

Page 3: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Exceptions for franchise agreements

Commission‘s Guidelines on Vertical Restraints

• on how to apply the BER to licencing IPRs (paras 24-26),

• concerning efficiency gains pursuant to Art 101(3) AEUV (para. 190(1))

• and non-compete clauses (para. 190(2)).

But otherwise no distiction for vertical restraints on the purchase, sale and resale of goods and

services within franchising arrangements.

l 3

Page 4: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

A non-compete clause in franchise agreements is justified and may even exceed five years, where the obligation

The transfer of substantial know-how usually justifies a non-compete obligation for the whole duration of the supply agreement, as for

example in the context of franchising. (Commission‘s Guidelines on Vertical Restraints, para. 148)

Non-compete obligations in franchising

l 4

Page 5: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Exclusive supply clauses together with territorital protection restrict competition, but can be justified, in case of

Exclusive supply clauses in franchising

l 5

Page 6: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

!! MIND THE NO-GOES !!

•no absolute territorital protection:

• don‘t eliminate possibility of cross-supply between franchisees

• don‘t restrict passive sales

•never in combination with determination of sales prices

Exclusive supply clauses in franchising

l 6

Page 7: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

• NO PRICE FIXING

• OK: recommendation of sales prices from franchisor to franchisees

no collusion between franchisor and franchisee as well as between franchisees amongst each other

l 7

Pricing in franchising

… as long as the franchiseesremain entirely free to

determinetheir own prices …

Page 8: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Use of the internet in franchising

« IT IS FORBIDDEN TO FORBID »

• General rule: no prohibition or restriction on the use of the internet by a franchisee to sell products

• The use of a website to sell products: a form of passive selling

• The use of an own website: not the same thing as the opening of a new outlet

l 8

Page 9: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Use of the internet in franchising

Authorised restrictions

• Active selling into other franchisees’ exclusive territories or customer groups through internet may be restrained within an exclusive distribution system

• Quality standards may be required for the use of the website

• A brick and mortar point of sale may, in principle, be required, excluding « pure players »

l 9

Page 10: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising

Definition

Post-term non-compete obligation is any direct or indirect obligation causing the franchisee, after termination of the agreement, not to

manufacture, purchase, sell or resell goods or services

l 10

Page 11: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising

Conditions of validity

Post-term non-compete obligation should be covered by the BER if it:

relates to goods or services which compete with the contract goods or services

is indispensable to protect know-how transferred by the franchisor to the franchisee

is limited to the premises and land from which the franchisee has operated during the contract period

is limited to a maximum period of one year after the termination of the agreement

l 11

Page 12: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising

Definition of know-how

“non-patented practical information, resulting from experience and testing by the franchisor, which is secret, substantial and identified”

“secret”: the know-how should not be generally known or easily accessible

“substantial”: the know-how should be significant and useful for the franchisee for the use, sale or resale of the contract goods or services

“identified”: the know-how should be described in a sufficiently comprehensive manner so as to make it possible to verify that it fulfils the criteria of secrecy and substantiality

l 12

Page 13: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising

Geographic scope

• The words ‘premises and land from which the buyer has operated during the contract period’ used in Article 5(3) of the BER refer only to the place from which the contract goods or services are offered for sale and not to the whole of the territory in which those goods and services may be sold under a franchise agreement (Order of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 7 February 2013, Case C-117/12 - La Retoucherie de Manuela)

l 13

Page 14: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Preferential and preemption rights in franchising

Competition law aspects

A right of priority (preferential right or preemption right) in favour of the franchisor to acquire the franchisee’s store:

may artificially reduce competition, notably by restricting the possibility for independent stores to be purchased by competing distribution groups

could, when combined with other elements (such as a minority shareholding), confer to the franchisor a decisive influence over the franchisee under merger control rules

l 14

Page 15: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Contact Details bpv Hügel

Professional ExperienceUniversity of Salzburg (1993 Mag. iur., 1997 Dr. iur.), University of Salzburg: Master in Journalism and French (1997 Mag. phil.), 1995 European Commission (Directorate General for Competition, stage in the Merger Task Force), 1998 court practice at the Cartel Court (Legal Assistant to the President), 1998 internship with Linklaters & Alliance (London), 1998–2002 Associate with an International Law Firm (Vienna), since 2002 Associated Partner with bpv Hügel, since 2004 Partner, Head of Competition & Antitrust

Areas of PracticeEuropean and Austrian Competition Law, (Antitrust, Merger Control and Market Dominance) Distribution Law, European Law, International Business Transactions, Representation before Austrian and European courts and competition authorities

Born1969

LanguagesGerman, English, French, Italian, Spanish

MembershipsInternational Bar Association, Union Internationale des Avocats (President of the Competition Law Commission), Vienna Bar Association, Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht e.V. (Member of the Board), International League of Competition Law

Additional Professional InformationFrequent speaker at seminars and conferences, numerous nominations in national and international rankings and publications

MMag. Dr. Astrid Ablasser-NeuhuberRechtsanwalt/Attorney-at-Law

Partner

Contact:bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OGDonau-City-Straße 111220 WienPhone: +43 1 260 50-205Fax: +43 1 260 50-208e-mail: [email protected]

l 15

Page 16: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Contact Details bpv Hügel

bpv Jádi Németh

Vörösmarty tér 4

HU-1051 Budapest

Tel. +36 1 429 4000

Fax +36 1 429 4001

[email protected]

www.bpv-jadi.com

bpv Grigorescu Stefanica

33 Dionisie Lupu Street

RO-020021 Bukarest

Tel. +40 21 264 16 50

Fax +40 21 264 16 60

[email protected]

www.bpv-grigorescu.com

bpv Braun Partners

Ovocný trh 8

CZ-110 00 Prag 1

Tel. +420 224 490 000

Fax +420 224 490 033

[email protected]

www.bpv-bh.com

bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte

Donau-City-Straße 11, ARES-Tower

AT-1220 Wien

Tel. +43 1 260 50 0

Fax +43 1 260 50 133

[email protected]

www.bpv-huegel.com

bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte Rond Point Schuman 9Postfach 14 / 4. StockBE-1040 BrüsselTel. +32 2 286 81 10Fax +32 2 286 81 [email protected]

bpv Braun Partners

Štefánikova 6/A

SK-811 05 Bratislava

Tel. (+421) 233 888 880

Fax.(+421) 257 200 170

[email protected]

www.bpv-bh.com

l 16

Page 17: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Contact Details UGGC Avocats

Corinne KhayatAvocat à la Cour

Partner

Contact:47 rue de Monceau75008 - ParisPhone: +33 1 56 69 70 00Fax: +33 1 56 69 70 71e-mail: [email protected]

Professional ExperiencePartner of UGGC Law Firm (2000)Lawyer, Robert Collin & Associés (1987-1999)Admitted to the Paris Bar (1991)Civil Law Degree (International Law), Paris V-René Descartes Law School

Areas of PracticeFrench, Moroccan and European Union Competition Law (Antitrust, Merger Control and Market Dominance), Distribution Law, European Law, Intellectual Property Law, Contract LawRepresentation before French and European courts and competition authorities, representation before Moroccan competition authorities

LanguagesFrench, English

MembershipsAPDC (Association of the practitioners of Competion Law)Institut Art & DroitUIA (International Union of Lawyers)

Additional Professional InformationLecturer in Competition Law at the University Paris I, Pantheon Sorbonne (2011)Professor of European Union Competition Law at the Institut Catholique (1995-2002)Nominations in rankings (Legal 500, Decideurs…) and publications

l 17

Page 18: Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne  Khayat Astrid  Ablasser-Neuhuber

21 February 2013

Contact Details UGGC Avocats

www.uggc.com

Tel: + 33 1 56 69 70 00

Fax: + 33 1 56 69 70 71

47 rue de Monceau

75008 Paris

France

l 18