Natural cropping system based on Brassicas biomasses for plant management … · 2018-12-12 ·...

35
Natural cropping system based on Brassicas biomasses for plant management and defense Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria, cerealicoltura e colture industriali Luca Lazzeri Senior Researcher CREA CI Bologna Italy

Transcript of Natural cropping system based on Brassicas biomasses for plant management … · 2018-12-12 ·...

  • Natural cropping system based on Brassicas biomasses for plant

    management and defense

    Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria, cerealicoltura e colture industriali

    Luca LazzeriSenior Researcher

    CREA CI Bologna Italy

  • The EU is requesting to produce more. with less chemistry (IPM techniques)

    A growing interest for non chemical systems as totalor partial alternative to chemical in agriculture

    totally widespread in the environment

    in contact with operators during and after distribution

    closest to food chain with all the problems of food health due to residue problem and sustainability

    Chemicals in European agriculture are more and more controlled (Directive 2009/128/EC “ Sustainable use of pesticides”) in the framework of a wider

    strategy of their registration (EC Regulation REACH 1907/2006). It encouragethe application of natural materials as non chemical strategies

    Pesticides and fertilisers are:

  • Soil fertility concept

    Soil fertility as the whole Physical, Chemical, and Biological characteristics of a soil is strongly linked to the organic matter amount, composition and

    dynamics requesting a plan for increasing soil organic matter

    It is not possible to produce high quality agriculture on lowfertility soils, without a wide application of Chemicals

    In the last 50 years the wide application of chemistry in agriculture, linked to the climate change determined a progressive decreasing of soil fertility, moreover in coastal areas, where the soils have very low organic matter

    amounts

  • 4

    The Brassicaceae Family

    350 genera Around 3700 specie More than 200 glucosinolates Generally herbaceous Present in each continent

  • An ancient Sanskrit text dated 10 century describes the effects of organic amendments and green manures

    (including crucifers)

    Surapala: The Science of plant life

  • The glucosinolate- myrosinase system (1)

    + D-GlucoseHOHO OH

    OHO

    S CR

    N-O3SO

    R CNOSO3--

    SH

    Myrosinase

    H2O

    R C N + S + HSO4-R N C S + HSO4-NitrileIsothiocyanate

    Glucosinolate

    Federal Register of rule and regulations: May 20, 1996, Vol. 61,No 98, page 25152No 25152--25153

    “Allyl-isothiocyanate (AITC), as component of mustard oil, is on the FDA Generally Recognized as a Safe (GRAS) Substance”

    EPA - 40 CFR Part 18040 180

  • 7

    Glucosinolate Biodiversity

    Glucosinolati con catena R alchilica Glucosinolati con catena R ossidrilica

    Nome Struttura Nome Struttura

    Glucocapparina x

    Progoitrina /Epiprogoitrina OH

    x

    Sinigrina

    x

    Gluconapoleiferina OHx

    Gluconapina

    x

    Glucosisimbrina x

    HO

    Glucobrassicanapina

    x Glucoconringina

    xHO

    Glucosinolati con catena R

    tiofunzionalizzata Glucosinolati con catena R aromatica

    Glucoerucina S x Glucotropeolina

    x

    Glucoiberina xSO

    Gluconasturtina x

    Glucorafanina x

    SO

    Sinalbina

    HO

    x

    Glucoalissina SO

    x

    Glucolimnantina

    x

    OMe

    Glucorafasatina S x Glucosinolati indolici

    Glucorafenina x

    SO

    Glucobrassicina N

    x

    H

    Glucocheirolina SO O

    x

    4-Idrossi glucobrassicina N

    x

    H

    OH

    4-Metossi glucobrassicina

    N

    x

    H

    OMe

    Neoglucobrassicina NOMe

    x

    Different R side chain

    DifferentIsothiocyanates

    Different biologicaleffect

    Different Physico-chemical properties

  • The CREA CI collection of purified glucosinolates

  • “Pest and desease suppression by glucosinolatecontaining plants arising specifically from the

    biocidal properties of the glucosinolate hydrolysisproducts, particularly the isothiocyanates,

    released from incorporated tissues or rotationcrops, notably the Brassicaceae”.

    (Kirkegaard and Matthiessen “Developing and refining the biofumigation concept”Proceeding of the First International Symposium “Biofumigation: a possible alternative to methylbromide?” Firenze 29 marzo-1 aprile 2004 - Agroindustria, 2004, 3 (3),233-239)

    __________________________________________________

    Biofumigation definition

  • Green manure and cover crops could offer a fundamental help to

    the farmer for:

    (i) Improving soil fertility in nutrient (Nitrogen, soil structure

    etc.) and the biodiversity in the system

    (ii) Playing a role in the decrease of CO2 in the atmosphere thanks to

    the SINK effect of organic matter in soil

    (iii) Improving the resistence of the agro-system to disease and pest

    for a multifunctional and more sustainable agriculture

    Green manure and cover crop roles

  • Biofumigant green manure plants (1)

    Plants selected for their capability of releasing volitile ITCs from theirepigean part. (B. juncea. B, rapa, Sinapis alba)

    They are applied in soil for containing soil bornefungi, nematodes and wireworms

  • Correlations of glucosinolate content in plants and mortality of Globodera pallida eggs

    R2 = 0,843 P‹ 0,0001

  • Biofumigant green manure: catch crops (2)

    Nematodes attack biofumigant plant roots, penetrates the root tissues and

    activates the enzymatic hydrolysis and isothiocyanates from glucoerucin or

    glucoraphasatin are released.

    The nematode feeds a poisoned media and does not end its growing cycle into

    the root during the time of biocidal crop cultivation (8-10 weeks).

    Plants selected for a high GL content in roots. (Eruca sativa sel. Nemat. Raphanus sativum cv. Karacter,

    (Crotalaria juncea)

  • Catch crop effect of E. sativa green manureNematode: Meloidogyne incognita

    Post J2 larvae

    J4 youngfemales

    Females

    Necrosisonrootsafternematode attack

  • Defatted seed meals

    Biofumigant pellets and mealsbased on B. carinata, B.juncea,

    B. nigra et al. seeds

    USA Patent N° US7,749,549B2 of 2010-06-06

    0,0

    25,0

    50,0

    75,0

    100,0

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    Rate % Formulated defatted mealsPellet

    Untreated defatted meals

    In vials In soils

    Grafico1

    153060

    3060120

    4590180

    60120300

    75150360

    9018012.7

    105210

    120240

    135270

    150330

    165390

    180

    240

    Formulated defatted meals

    Pellet

    Untreated defatted meals

    Rate %

    6.1307757289

    2.3061885653

    1.5892263026

    20.8481501661

    13.0369236209

    4.8179901364

    32.6102548322

    21.7847834447

    4.0764371596

    41.7714239182

    35.5393882981

    6.3781769727

    47.0503136484

    43.9589544253

    12.3485561119

    61.9648152177

    55.1052304148

    63.4681055429

    53.1773001693

    64.4197255392

    59.6142247626

    68.7178389894

    62.0571993387

    66.4580354124

    69.5232258687

    71

    87.2924240587

    72

    74

    Foglio1

    1-1,5mediad.s.

    15152045152013145713149923.6666666673647

    30406459435815452491431588.33333333323305

    45588334706940674809656694.33333333361343

    6075335589335584935983202371592

    751048937818748931470933051.666666667115103

    901136787117237913463011218489112110

    1051198486134000912032831247259.3333333380359

    1201281177132775011874881265471.6666666771438

    135136156614154411266183134773075585

    1501258147147536111799361304481.33333333153066

    1651179649151878012011981299875.66666667189883

    1801349560150939213124791390477104639

    240111428113327321223506.5154468

    1-1,5mediad.s.

    15149923.6666666673647

    30431588.33333333323305

    45656694.33333333361343

    6083202371592

    75933051.666666667115103

    901218489112110

    1051247259.3333333380359

    1201265471.6666666771438

    135134773075585

    1501304481.33333333153066

    1651299875.66666667189883

    1801390477104639

    2401223506.5154468

    minore 0,25mediaD.S

    10297602304666382987328418.33333333347390

    2070510466129075538370725947084

    301159053113924411863061161534.3333333323629

    401520839124392812131631325976.66666667169455

    501623005168446514731591593543108690

    601715839184744015727391712006137391

    701852658180273916281351761177.33333333117891

    801801920187383216928301789527.3333333391135

    901726939184959618055501794028.3333333362135

    1001722507189296516538001756424123137

    11018033081697200175025475030

    120177618516669701721577.577227

    Formulated pelletsScaglie - 0,25

    mediad.s.mediad.s.

    30690258497276998.51127660663037085668579.53219.4571747424

    60301532265719283625.5253241201388411445491416954036.1655070128

    9042088248326045207144108180116456133349124902.511945.1548545843

    120751888681961716924.549446300201117152934177025.534070.5260379114

    150935118822979879048.57929436027185335259731222557094.6299401266

    18011055951081759109367716855

    210104092310721841056553.522105

    240113976012212411180500.557616Scaglie - 0,25

    270128552011695631227541.581994mediad.s.

    330148724312553661371304.51639626068579.53219.4571747424

    390181747516094481713461.51470971201416954036.1655070128

    180124902.511945.1548545843

    300177025.534070.5260379114

    36031222557094.6299401266

    Untreated defatted meals

    mediamg/lumoli/gresa

    Formulated defatted mealsumoli/gresa6068579.50.01459261921.47162355621.6

    mg/l%1201416950.04423982614.46145886634.8

    15149923.6666666670.04757642354.79794508556.1180124902.50.03743072653.77478080984.1

    30431588.3333333330.161787099216.3157623220.8300177025.50.05856579865.90619187686.4

    45656694.3333333330.253064108325.520785431632.63603122250.113387109511.434762959612.3

    608320230.32415717732.690316358441.812.7

    75933051.6666666670.365122742336.821575461247.1

    9012184890.480863176148.493664389462.0

    1051247259.333333330.492529102349.670139397963.5

    1201265471.666666670.499913922450.41487720764.4

    13513477300.533268407153.778580793168.7

    1501304481.333333330.515731740252.010058513766.5

    1651299875.666666670.513864213551.821723826571.0

    18013904770.55060165655.526588944672.0

    2401223506.50.482897694948.698839744474.0

    umoli/gresa

    minore 0.25mg/l%

    10328418.3333333330.119953256312.096939923314.7

    207072590.273567300427.588473211233.6

    301161534.333333330.457768937746.164677054656.3

    401325976.666666670.524447766252.88904459264.4

    5015935430.632941785363.830353496477.8

    6017120060.680976703768.674536471883.7

    701761177.333333330.700914920570.685248135586.1

    801789527.333333330.71241040871.844534894787.5

    901794028.333333330.714235494172.028589557987.8

    10017564240.698987517270.490875070485.9

    11017502540.696485677470.23857174485.6

    1201721577.50.684857799269.065933763484.2

    umoli/gresa

    Pelletmediamg/l%

    3076998.50.01800639381.81589287632.3

    60283625.50.101790453610.265273659113.0

    904520710.170092504417.153338484421.8

    120716924.50.277486511527.98371434635.5

    150879048.50.343225291634.613280714544.0

    18010936770.430253836243.389858428655.1

    2101056553.50.415200829841.871806153353.2

    2401180500.50.465459425646.94024057859.6

    2701227541.50.484533825148.863838759362.1

    3301371304.50.542827503154.74258804969.5

    3901713461.50.681566886468.734054703887.3

    Foglio1

    3646.57940175893646.579401758947389.656680897647389.656680897611276.231839581911276.2318395819

    23305.252397974923305.252397974947083.502216806347083.502216806325323.615154633825323.6151546338

    61342.902363137161342.902363137123628.917079149723628.917079149744107.906796854544107.9067968545

    71591.917644382271591.9176443822169455.357012794169455.35701279449445.855888031749445.8558880317

    115102.650631222115102.650631222108690.218014318108690.21801431879294.247335478379294.2473354783

    112109.893069256112109.893069256137390.606545717137390.60654571716854.597236362516854.5972363625

    80359.369723346580359.3697233465117890.514819189117890.51481918922104.865086672722104.8650866727

    71437.737102553171437.737102553191135.144929567891135.144929567857615.767637861157615.7676378611

    75584.812052422375584.812052422362134.905764258962134.905764258981993.981026048581993.9810260485

    153065.788111954153065.788111954123137.104371509123137.104371509163961.799101193163961.799101193

    189882.648534124189882.64853412475029.686338142275029.6863381422147097.302369894147097.302369894

    104639.06086639104639.0608663977226.667107288877226.6671072888

    154468.183456982154468.183456982

    1-1,5

    minore 0,25

    Formulated pellets

    Foglio2

    Formulated defatted meals

    Pellet

    Untreated defatted meals

    Rate %

    Foglio3

    minuti

  • Gall index and vigour after treatment with different DSM (2)

    On soils with 30 J2 larvae in 100 cm-3 inoculum of Meloidogyne incognita

  • Oil N P K C C/N OM Gl

    % on

    DM9-12 5-6 0.7-1 1-1.5 40-45 7-8 80/85 4.1/4.7

    That for a dose of 2.5 t ha-1 on dry matter means:

    Kg ha-1

    125/ 150

    18/25

    25/ 38

    1000/ 1100

    100/117

    Biofumigant pellets composition

  • Pilot plant for post harvest biofumigation

    Treatment cabin 0.1m3 Reactor:

    DSM+water

    NCS

    AITC

    Quality Maintaining,Extension of shelf-life

    improvement of nutraceutical properties

  • Liquid biofumigant formulations

    Liquid formulation are essentially vegetable oil/water emulsions where DSM are mixed

    Oil in the emulsion plays a suffocatingeffect on pests or pathogens and

    protecting plants from ITCs phytotoxicity

    DSM in the emulsion play the wellknown «biofumigant effect»

    The emulsion activates the hydrolysis reaction of DSM, releasing isothiocyanates (ITCs) that naturallyare solubilised in the oil phase

  • Different final preparation of the liquid formulations

    Foliar formulations

    Duolif Duofruit

    The suspension is taken at the requested concentration in

    water.DSM are micronized at a sizelower than 150 micron, a size

    that permits the distribution of the emulsion still containing DSM

    by mechanical pumps.

    Root formulation

    Biofence FL

    The suspension is taken at the requested concentration of

    water. DSM are applied at a sizeof 1000/2000 micron to make a simple remval the suspension by a simple filtration. In this way, no DSM remains in the emulsion to avoid problem to drip irrigation

    system

  • Isothiocyanate release duringliquid formulation preparation

    Time (min)

    AIT

    C Y

    IELD

    (%)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    non-formulated DSMformulated DSM

    Root treatment

    Time (min)0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

    AIT

    C Y

    IELD

    (%)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    non-formulated DSMformulated DSM

    Foliar treatment

  • The main target of foliar liquids is in epigeal apparatus defense, not only in horticulture, but even in floriculture, fruit, grape and several other crops

    New open field application for foliar liquid

    1) Pests and disease control2) 2) Biostimulant effect3) Earliness of ripening4) Leaf washing5) leaves functionality

    TreatedUntreated

  • 23

    Pest and disease control (1)

    The main target for foliar liquid formulation are pests and diseases, limited to

    organisms of small dimension to permit a sufficient persistence of oil microfilm

    enriched by ITCs

    Scientific studies on their effect on :• Aphids. Cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii G.), (Aphis fabae S.), (Myzus persicae

    S.)• Mites. Twospotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae K.), Citrus red• mite (Panonycus citri McG.).• Scales. (Aonidiella aurantii, A.), Pyriform scale (Protopulvinaria

    pyriformis C.), Japanese citrus scale (Unaspis yanonensis K.),Cottonycushion scale (Icerya purchasi M.).

    • Whitefly. Woolly whitefly (Aleurothrixus floccosus M.).• Oidium (Podosphaera xanthii B.), (Golovinomyces cichoracearum DC),

    sugar beet oidium (Erysiphe betae V), cucurbitacee oidium (Erysiphecichoracearum DC ).

  • Evaluation of Duofruit and DuolifUNITA’ DI RICERCA

    PER L’ORTICOLTURAMonsampolo del Tronto (AP) Italy

    Effect of the liquid foliar treatments on spiders on eggplants and Oidium on melon

    Dr. V. FerrariDr. E. Piccinini

    n° Acari / leaf

    EGGPLANTCompared to the chemical fenazaquin (Magister)

    in the control of Red spider(Tetranycus urticae)

    ResultsDuofruit showed a higher containment effect in

    comparison to Duolif with a persistence of around14 days

    Defense strategy : a treatment every 15 days

    Untreated

    MELONCompared to the chemical product Penconazol(Topas) in the control of Oidium (Podosphaera

    xanthii, Golovinomyces cichoracearum)

    10,0

    15,0

    20,0

    25,0

    30,0

    35,0

    T0 T+7 T+14

    Testimone

    Topas

    Duolif

    Duofruit

    A.I.* / leaf

    ResultsDuofruit showed a similar containment effect in

    comparison to Topas

    Defense strategy : a treatment every 20 days

    ∑ % superficie fogliare coperta da macchieI.A.*=

    Log10 % foglie malate

    Untreated

    Grafico1

    T0T0T0T0

    T+7T+7T+7T+7

    T+14T+14T+14T+14

    T+21T+21T+21T+21

    Testimone

    Magister

    Duolif

    Duofruit

    6

    11

    13

    10

    18

    0.1

    7

    1

    33

    0.1

    15

    5

    65

    1

    40

    25

    Foglio1

    TestimoneMagisterDuolifDuofruit

    T06.011.013.010.0

    T+718.00.17.01.0

    T+1433.00.115.05.0

    T+2165.01.040.025.0

    Per ridimensionare l'intervallo di dati del grafico, trascinare l'angolo inferiore destro dell'intervallo.

    Grafico1

    T0T0T0T0

    T+7T+7T+7T+7

    T+14T+14T+14T+14

    Testimone

    Topas

    Duolif

    Duofruit

    14

    13.4

    14.5

    13.9

    21.1

    13.7

    16.5

    14.2

    33.4

    15.5

    18.7

    15.8

    Foglio1

    TestimoneTopasDuolifDuofruit

    T014.013.414.513.9

    T+721.113.716.514.2

    T+1433.415.518.715.8

    Per ridimensionare l'intervallo di dati del grafico, trascinare l'angolo inferiore destro dell'intervallo.

    I.A.*=∑ % superficie fogliare coperta da macchie

    Log10 % foglie malate

  • Biofence liquid formulation efficacy on citrus in the control of Aonidiella (Erysiphe betae

    0

    10

    2030

    40

    50

    Veg

    etab

    leoi

    l

    Min

    eral

    oi

    l

    Biof

    ence

    form

    ulat

    ion

    Biof

    ence

    with

    min

    eral

    oil

    Infe

    sted

    Lea

    f Sur

    face

    (%

    of t

    he c

    ontr

    ol)

    a a

    bb

    Grafico1

    Vegetable oil

    Mineral oil

    Biofence formulation

    Biofence with mineral oil

    Infested Leaf Surface (% of the control)

    42

    42

    12

    5

    Foglio1

    Vegetable oil42b

    Mineral oil42b

    Biofence formulation12a

    Biofence with mineral oil5a

    Vegetable oil42.5

    Mineral oil47

    Biofence formulation97

    Biofence with mineral oil100

    control75.4a

    chemical insechicide (MIRO)22b

    biofence formulation1c

    Foglio1

    Infested Leaf Surface (% of the control)

    Foglio2

    Mortality (% of control)

    OENIDIELLA

    Foglio3

    Mortality (% of control)

    TETRANYCHUS URTICAE

  • Some trials on orange cultivation

    26

    020406080

    100

    Duofruit Mineraloil

    Untreatedlar

    val m

    orta

    lity

    (%)

    aa

    b

    Unaspis yanonensis Aphid gossypi

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Livi

    ng a

    phid

    per

    leaf

    (%)

    b b a

    c

    Duolif + pirethrum

    Duolif Imida-cloprid

    Untreated

    c

    Protopulvinaria pyriformis

    Larv

    alm

    orta

    lity

    (%)

    Duolif Mineraloil

    Untreated

    b

    aa

  • 27

    New application fields for root liquidformulates (1)

    The main target for root liquid formulation are soil borne pests, even asrescue treatment after pre-plant with biofumigant green manure and defatted

    seed meals.

    Positive scientific results on:

    • Nematodes: Southern root-knot nematode (Meloydogineincognita Chitw. Kofoid et White).

    • Wireworms: (Agriotes sordidus, Agriotes litigiosus)

    • Soilborn Fungi: (Armillaria mellea V.)

  • 28

    Unsatisfactory effects of foliar liquid formulations

    Diseases: Plasmopara viticola B., Aspergillus and fungiproducing mycotoxins

    Pests: Ceratitis capitata W., Red weevil (Rhynchophorusferrugineus O.), Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophilasuzukii M. and all the insect of “bigger” size (includingbees) and with rapid movement as Thrips (Frankliniellaoccidentalis)

    At moment unsatisfactory effect on:

  • This root liquid was studied as a support of plant during cultivation, but itpermitted to open new application fields not only in horticulture for

    nematode control, but even on fruit replant (apple, peaches, grape) and othercrops

    New field of application for root liquidformulations

    1) Containment of root infestation

    2) Improvement of soil biological and chemical fertility

    3) Biostimulation of root system 4) Lengthening of harvesting period

    Untreated TreatedUntreatedTreated

  • Biofumigant green manureB. juncea sel ISCI20 – ISCI99

    Green manure catch cropEruca sativa sel Nemat

    Biofumigant pelletsEU Patent N° 03 792 616.9 -

    1219

    Plants and materials for biofumigation

    Liquid root treatmentPCT EP 2009/050143

    Liquid foliar treatmentPCT W 2006/136933 A2

  • The biofumigant purposal, even considering all the potential sinergies with other non chemical

    alternatives (viz. Solarization, antagonists etc. ) hasto be considered as a real cropping system that has

    to be applied with a year after year strategy for a total or partial alternative to chemicals.

    The production line can be considered as a biorefinery approach in the ambit of circular

    economy

    Brassica cropping system

  • Brassica cropping system

    The biofumigant purposal, even considering all the potential sinergies with other non chemicalalternatives (viz. Solarization, antagonists,

    biostimulant etc. ) has to be considered as a realcropping system that has to be applied with a year

    after year strategy for a total or partial alternative to chemicals.

    The production line follows a biorefinery approach in the ambit of circular economy

  • It becomes crucial to evaluate not only the economic balance (€/kg), but even the environmental one (kg CO2eq/kg)

    Seeds Residues

    Inputs

    Outputs

    Luca Lazzeri, Lorenzo D’Avino “Green Chemistry, a first step towards” - S. Lucia, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, Italy. November 27th , 2013

    Environmental balance

  • GHG emission by Biofumigation Kg CO2e ha-1

    ec from cultivation phase 1523±707ep from processing 159ef for pellet production 41

    ef for epigeal formulation 166

    ef for hypogeal formulation 449Eb Emissions of biorefinery =

    ec + ep + Σ (ef+ epk+ etd)2338

    GHG emission by Conventionaleai from Metham sodium production 2127eai from paraffinic oil production 943eai from Oxamyl production 746Ec Emission of conventional proposal

    = Σ (eai+epk+etd)

    3816

    Biofumigation material evaluation by the Biorefinery approach of carbon foot print

  • Biofumigant plants and materials…

    • Could change the farmer role from user of chemicals to producer of its own bio-based materials for plant management and defense in the framework of a new multifunctional agriculture

    • Have not to be considered a simple product innovation but a systemone, that considers soil fertility management and plant health as a

    fundamental starting point for a real sustainable production.

    The GL-MYR system management plays a fundamental role of bioactivemolecules• products from a biorefinery chain linked to the territory with

    positive environmental balances

    • Can be surely improved and diversified for new materials and applications. The topic request more and more research for defining

    the system limits.

    Diapositiva numero 1Diapositiva numero 2Diapositiva numero 3Diapositiva numero 4Diapositiva numero 5 The glucosinolate- myrosinase system (1)Diapositiva numero 7Diapositiva numero 8Diapositiva numero 9Diapositiva numero 10Diapositiva numero 11Diapositiva numero 12Diapositiva numero 13Diapositiva numero 14Diapositiva numero 15Diapositiva numero 16Diapositiva numero 17Diapositiva numero 18Diapositiva numero 19Different final preparation of the liquid formulationsDiapositiva numero 21Diapositiva numero 22Diapositiva numero 23 Diapositiva numero 25 Some trials on orange cultivationDiapositiva numero 27Diapositiva numero 28Diapositiva numero 29Diapositiva numero 30Diapositiva numero 31Diapositiva numero 32Diapositiva numero 33Diapositiva numero 34Diapositiva numero 35