Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

72
© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics GIS in Natural Capital Valuation and Beyond The Value of Natural Capital: Theory, Practice, and Policy

Transcript of Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

Page 1: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

GIS in Natural Capital Valuation and Beyond

The Value of Natural Capital: Theory,

Practice, and Policy

Page 2: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 3: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 4: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 5: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics

Page 6: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 7: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 8: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Overlay

Page 9: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 10: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 11: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Terminology and Overview of GIS • Uses of GIS

Data analysis

Design/Planning

Cartography/Visualization

Participatory GIS

Data creation

• Types of Data

Point Data

Line Data

Polygon Data

Raster Data

• Operations

Arc Toolbox

Clip

Overlay

Batch Processing

Huff Model

Summary Statistics

Selecting and Exporting Data

Editor

Geocoding/Digitizing

Buffering

• Other important words:

Python Scripts

“Geodesign”

Spatial Statistics

Page 13: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 14: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics

Work Flow Diagram

Page 15: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Study Overview • $90,000 RFP, 5 Modules, 8 months

Economic Contribution of all outdoor recreation in Washington State

Economic Contribution of outdoor recreation on Washington State public lands

Economic Contribution of outdoor recreation on Washington State private lands

Economic Impact of expenditures on outdoor recreation by non-local visitors

Economic Value of recreation-related ecosystem services

All Modules with results broken down by State-wide, County, Legislative District, Activities,

Managing Entities, Visitor Types

• $21.6 Billion in annual expenditures; $20.5 billion in economic contributions

• 200,000 jobs

• $9.1 billion in out-of-state “leakages”

• 56 Days of recreation per year per Washingtonian

• 19 million acres of public recreation land provide $115 to $248

billion in ecosystem service benefits per year

Page 16: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Washington State: 6th in the Nation for

Outdoor Recreation Economy

Page 17: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Washington State: Tied for Last in State Level Investment

Page 18: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 19: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Public Outdoor Recreation Lands & Non-Public Timberland

Page 20: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Private Outdoor Recreation

Page 21: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Ecosystem Services • $115 billion to $248 billion in ecosystem service benefits per year

• Consumer Surplus of $19.6 billion to $31.2 billion

Page 22: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Sample Map Distributed to All Legislators

Page 23: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 24: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 25: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 26: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Outdoor Recreation Businesses

Page 27: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Outdoor Recreation as an Economic Driver

• Redistribution of Wealth from Urban to Rural Areas

• Outdoor recreation economic activity influences all sectors

• Tourists inject extra money into the economy, while using few

taxpayer resources

• Outdoor recreation is something that all classes, ages, races, and

political parties share

• Outdoor recreation provides immense physical and mental health

benefits

• Outdoor recreation provides a funding mechanism for conservation

of natural capital

Page 28: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 29: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 30: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Case Study: Florham Park, New Jersey • Objective: Use ESV to measure the potential benefits of restoration

and recreational access to a 96 acre Property

Figure 1. The Project Site outlined in purple, north of Route

24 (thick yellow) and south of the Columbia Turnpike 510.

Inset: Location of the Project Site in Northeast USA, 30

miles west of New York City

Page 31: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Case Study: Characterization of Land Cover

Land Cover

Area in Present State (Acres)

Area in

Hypothetical

Restoration Plan (Acres)

Forest 36 57

Wetland 45 19

Grassland

/ Shrub 11 18

Developed <1 0

Fresh Water

4 1

Total 96 96

Page 32: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Case Study: Selection of Studies “Before” Scenario “After” Scenario

Fo

res

t

Fre

sh

Wa

ter

Gra

ss

lan

d

We

tla

nd

De

ve

lop

ed

Fo

res

t

Fre

sh

Wa

ter

Gra

ss

lan

d

We

tla

nd

De

ve

lop

ed

Regulating

Biological Control 2 2 2 2

Climate Stability 1 1 1 1 1 1

Moderation of

Extreme Events 1 1 1 1 1

Soil Retention 4 4

Waste Treatment 1 1 1 1 1 1

Water Regulation 1 1

Supporting Habitat and

Nursery 1 2 1 1

Information

Aesthetic

Information 3 4 3 1 4

Recreation and

Tourism 2 1 2

Science and

Education 1

Ecosystem service not produced by land cover

Ecosystem service produced by land cover, but not able to be valued

n Ecosystem service produced by land cover with number (n) of available estimates

Table 4. Ecosystem Services represented in the Earth Economics EVT

Page 33: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Case Study: Conversion of Value

Acres

Low

($/acre/year)

High

($/acre/year) Low ($/year) High ($/year)

Forest 36 4,319 10,043 156,852 364,731

Wetland 45 17,038 25,044 759,903 1,116,981

Grassland/Shrub 11 24,053 25,726 256,925 274,796

Developed 0 - - - -

Fresh Water 4 - - - -

Total 96 1,173,679 1,756,508

Acres

Low

($/acre/year)

High

($/acre/year) Low ($/year) High ($/year)

Forest 57 4,811 11,064 275,083 632,701

Wetland 19 67,164 85,281 1,288,257 1,635,759

Grassland/

Shrub 18 41,462 43,135 760,933 791,639

Developed - - - - -

Fresh Water 1 24,803 57,130 30,260 69,699

Total 96 2,354,534 3,129,799

Table 6. The Value of Ecosystem Services Produced on the Project Site by Land Cover Type following

the Hypothetical Restoration Plan

Table 5. The Value of Ecosystem Services Produced on the Project Site by Land Cover Type in the

Present State

Page 34: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Case Study: Maximizing Returns

Page 35: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Case Study: Visualizing Returns

Page 36: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Ecosystem Service Focus: Recreation

• USGS Protected Area Database has

comprehensive set of conservation and recreation

areas

• ArcMap Huff Model determines probability of

visitation given “competing” sites (inputs: census

blocks, protected areas, and geographic

boundary)

Page 37: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

FEMA and Flood Risk Reduction

Figure 2. Project Site providing flood risk reduction, a directional

ecosystem service, to downstream FEMA Flood Areas

• In 2013, all national flood policy for benefit-cost analysis adopted Earth Economics values and

methodology to recognize ecosystem services (including outdoor recreation) as a benefit to

flood-plain buyouts

Page 38: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 39: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 40: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 41: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 42: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 43: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 44: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 45: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 46: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 47: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 48: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 49: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 50: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 51: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 52: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 53: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 54: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 56: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 57: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 58: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 59: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 60: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 61: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 62: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 63: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 64: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 65: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 66: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 67: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 68: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 69: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 70: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 71: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics

Page 72: Natural Capital, GIS, Earth Economics

© 2015 Earth Economics © 2015 Earth Economics