Murphy Environmental Dust Monitoring Report for …Environmental Dust Monitoring Report for...

Murphy Environmental Dust Monitoring Report for Gormanston Inert Waste Facility (EPA Licence W0151-01), Quarter 2, 2016 July 2016

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

[Page intentionally blank]

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

Report Issue Form

IF-11B Revision: 02 (21st July 2011)

Client Name: Murphy Environmental

Client Address: Sarsfieldstown, Gormanston, Co. Meath

Report Title: Dust Monitoring Report for Gormanston Inert Waste Facility (EPA Licence W0151-01), Quarter 2, 2016

Project Code: MU0122

Project Manager (Name): Kerstie Flanagan

Project Manager (Sign):

Project Manager (Date): 13th July 2016

Approved by Project Director (Name): Dr. Conor Tonra

Approved by Project Director (Sign):

Approved by Project Director (Date): 13th July 2016

Issue No. Date Status

01 13/07/2016 Final version.

Issue to Client and EPA (EDEN).

Notes/Comments:

Patel Tonra Ltd., Environmental Solutions, 3f, Fingal Bay Business Park, Balbriggan, Co Dublin Tel: 01 8020520 Fax: 01 8020525 www.pateltonra.com

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

[Page intentionally blank]

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

Murphy Environmental

Dust Monitoring Report for Gormanston Inert Waste Facility (EPA Licence W0151-01), Quarter 2, 2016

Contents

Executive Summary ................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................... 2 2.0 Methodology .................................................................................. 4 3.0 Results .......................................................................................... 6 4.0 Discussion and Conclusions .............................................................. 8

Appendices Appendix 1: Field Monitoring Records Appendix 2: Chain of Custody Documentation Appendix 3: Laboratory Results Appendix 4: Dust Monitoring Calculations Figures Figure 1: Monitoring Locations Drawing

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Executive Summary

- 1 -

Executive Summary

1. Murphy Environmental (a division of Murphy Concrete Manufacturing Ltd.)

operates an inert waste facility at its site at Sarsfieldstown, Gormanston, Co. Meath. Restoring the site (a sand and gravel pit) will serve to return it in line with pre-quarrying conditions and integrate it into the surrounding landscape.

2. The facility is licensed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and operates under Waste Licence W0151-01. The licensee (Murphy Environmental) must manage and operate the facility to ensure that the activities do not cause environmental pollution. Murphy Environmental is required to carry out regular environmental monitoring and submit all monitoring results to the EPA.

3. Dust deposition must be monitored at four locations within or around the site on a bi-annual1 basis. Dust monitoring for Quarter 2, 2016 was conducted between the 30th May 2016 and the 28th June 2016.

4. Dust monitoring results at D1, D2, D3/D3a and D4/D4a/D4b for Quarter 2, 2015 were significantly below the EPA licence W0151-01 limit of 350 mg/m2/day.

5. 37 No. dust monitoring rounds (with 4 No. monitoring points per round) have been completed at the facility under EPA Licence W0151-01, commencing in Quarter 4, 2003. In that time, the EPA licence limit of 350 mg/m2/day has been exceeded on 5 No. occasions only: at D1 during Q3, 2004, Q2, 2007 and Q3, 2007 and at D3 in Q2, 2007 and in Q2, 2015. The overall compliance rate for dust monitoring, since the commencement of dust monitoring at this site, is 96%.

1 Correspondence to EPA, 01/04/2014 (response outstanding)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

1

- 2 -

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background 1.1.1 Murphy Environmental (a division of Murphy Concrete Manufacturing Ltd.)

operates an inert waste facility at its site at Sarsfieldstown, Gormanston, Co. Meath. Restoring the site (a sand and gravel pit) will serve to return it in line with pre-quarrying conditions and integrate it into the surrounding landscape.

1.1.2 The facility is licensed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and operates

under Waste Licence W0151-01. The licensee (Murphy Environmental) must manage and operate the facility to ensure that the activities do not cause environmental pollution. Murphy Environmental is required to carry out regular environmental monitoring and submit all monitoring results to the EPA.

1.1.3 In accordance with Schedule D of Waste Licence No. W0151-01, Murphy

Environmental is required to carry out dust monitoring on a quarterly basis. EPA correspondence (19/07/2011) subsequently amended the sampling interval for dust to once per annum. The current frequency of dust monitoring is bi-annual2.

1.1.4 This report details the environmental dust monitoring which took place in and

around the Gormanston site during Quarter 2, 2015, including the sampling and analytical methods used. This report also includes an interpretation of the results obtained.

1.2 Dust Particle Size 1.2.1 Dust particle size is important in determining the way in which these particulates

move through the air. When dust particles are released to air they have a tendency to fall back to ground at a rate that is proportional to the particulate size, this effect is known as the settling velocity. Fine dust particles may have the potential to disperse over an extensive area but it is usually the larger particulates that cause most nuisance. The main reason for larger particles being perceived to be a greater nuisance is that: They are more visible to the naked eye

They are the particulates which more readily settle out of suspension

1.2.2 For this reason deposition monitoring for nuisance dusts concentrates mainly on

dust particles of 20 µm diameter and above. 1.3 Monitoring Locations 1.3.1 The dust monitoring locations as prescribed by the Waste Licence W0151-01, are

outlined in Table 1.1 below and illustrated in the attached map, see Figure 1.

2 Correspondence to EPA, 01/04/2014 (response outstanding)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

1

- 3 -

Table 1.1: Dust Monitoring Locations Dust Station Location

D1 North western boundary of the site

D2 Near site entrance – to the southern boundary of the site

D3a* North east boundary of the site, within Zone 5

D4b* West of site

*D3 and D4 were repositioned to D3a and D4a, respectively, in Quarter 3, 2013. This was conducted for access/Health & Safety reasons. In Q2, 2015, monitoring location D4a was moved to D4b, located adjacent to TW-2, for security reasons (dust gauge had previously been knocked over at D4a). The distance between the original and the repositioned locations was minimal. The locations of D3a and D4b are shown in Figure 1.

1.4 Site Activities 1.4.1 To aid in interpretation of monitoring reports, the type and level of activity

operating3 during the period is detailed below. 1.4.2 The W0151-01 licensed tonnes per annum is 750,000; this equates to a licensed

tonnes per month of 62,500. The level of activity on site has been banded as follows: Normal level of activity: Waste acceptance of 45,000 - 65,000 tonnes per

month

High level of activity: Waste acceptance of >65,000 tonnes per month

Low level of activity: Waste acceptance <45,000 tonnes per month

1.4.3 On this basis, the level of activity at the site for the monitoring (and preceding)

period can be categorised as follows:

April 2016: High level of activity

May 2016: High level of activity

June 2016: High level of activity

3 Information requested by the Agency as EPA Correspondence, EPA Reference No. (W0151-01)13SI09MOR re. EPA Site Inspection 28/11/2013

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

2

- 4 -

2.0 Methodology

2.0.1 Dust monitoring for Quarter 2, 2016 was carried out between the 30th May 2016 and the 28th June 2016.

2.0.2 The type of dust deposition gauge used was the Bergerhoff dust gauge which was

exposed over a 30-day period to collect bulk dust deposition (see Plates 1 and 2). The method is based on the German Standard Method VDI 2119 and collects total particulate matter.

2.0.3 The apparatus consists of a collection vessel in the form of a plastic sample bottle,

supported on a stand of approximately 1.5 metres high. The gauges were located at four positions as outlined in Schedule D of Waste Licence W0151-01 (see Chapter 1 and Figure 1, Monitoring Locations Drawing).

2.0.4 The size of the sampling bottle used was recorded, as the diameter of the bottle

impacts on the dust calculation, as per Appendix 2. For calculation purposes, ‘Type A’ sample bottle has a diameter of 8.8 cm; ‘Type B’ sample bottle has a diameter of 9.2 cm.

2.0.5 The gauges were left for a period of 30 days. When the sample period had elapsed the sample bottles were checked for the presence of any unusual deposits such as leaves or insects and these were removed before analysis of the samples took place.

2.0.6 The samples collected were then transferred to Alcontrol Laboratories for

gravimetric analysis to determine the concentration of deposit material in each gauge bottle.

Plate 1: Dust Bottle, Type A The dust bottle used as part of the Bergerhoff dust deposition gauge

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

2

- 5 -

Plate 2: Bergerhoff Dust Gauge The Bergerhoff dust gauge apparatus as used to measure the level of dust deposition

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

3

- 6 -

3.0 Results

3.0.1 Results obtained from the laboratory were expressed as total milligrams of dust per sample, for each of the monitoring points (see Appendix 1). Conversion factors were applied to convert laboratory results to milligrams per metre squared per day, based on a 30-day monitoring period (see Appendix 2). Results are listed in Table 3.1 and illustrated in Chart 3.1 below. Table 3.1: Environmental Dust Monitoring Results for Gormanston Landfill (W0151-01) – all results in mg/m2/day Monitoring Location

EPA Waste Licence Limit Value

Q2, 2016 Q3, 2015 Q2, 2015 Q3, 2014

D1 350 11.62 8.93 6.00 25.20

D2 350 193.30 32.17 14.60 15.00

D3/D3a* 350 25.32 6.96 22.00 13.50

D4/D4a/D4b* 350 46.96 0.03 82.80 90.40

*D3 and D4 were repositioned to D3a and D4a, respectively, in Quarter 3, 2013. This was conducted for access/Health & Safety reasons. Monitoring location D4a was moved to D4b, located adjacent to TW-2, for security reasons (dust gauge had previously been knocked over at D4a). The distance between the original and the repositioned locations was minimal. The locations of D3a and D4b are shown in Figure 1.

3.0.2 EPA Waste Licence W0151-01 sets a limit in Schedule C.3 for dust deposition of 350mg/m2/day.

3.0.3 Quarter 2, 2016 monitoring results for D1, D2, D3/D3a and D4/D4a/D4b sampling

positions were significantly below the emission limit value for dust set in Waste Licence W0151-01.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

3

- 7 -

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

4

- 8 -

4.0 Discussion and Conclusions

4.1 Rainfall Data 4.1.1 Dust monitoring for Quarter 2, 2016 was conducted between the 30th May 2016

and the 28th June 2016. Rainfall amounts locally for the period are shown graphically in Chart 4.1 below. The total level of rainfall was recorded at 43.3mm, with 8 days recording greater than 1mm of rain and 2 days recording greater than 5mm. The wettest day was 19th June 2016 when a total of 10.7mm of rainfall was recorded.

4.1.2 The 30-year average (1981-2010) gives a mean monthly rainfall of 59.5mm for

May and 66.7mm for June. Rainfall amounts for the monitoring period were, therefore, significantly below average.

Chart 4.1: Daily rainfall at Dublin Airport during monitoring period

4.2 Interpretation

D1 4.2.1 D1 is located at the north-western boundary of the site and is in close proximity to

the road. The level of dust measured at this point was 11.6 mg/m2/day, which is significantly below the EPA licence limit of 350 mg/m2/day (as per Table 3.1).

D2

4.2.2 D2 is located close to the site entrance, along the southern boundary of the site. The level of dust measured at this point was 197.3 mg/m2/day, which is significantly below the EPA licence limit of 350 mg/m2/day (as per Table 3.1).

D3a

4.2.3 The level of dust measured at D3a was 25.3 mg/m2/day, which is significantly below the EPA licence limit of 350 mg/m2/day (as per Table 3.1). D4b

4.2.4 D4b is located in the west of the site. In Q2, 2016, monitoring location D4a was moved to D4b, located adjacent to TW-2, for security reasons (dust gauge had previously been knocked over at D4a).

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Chapter

4

- 9 -

4.2.5 The level of dust measured at this point was 46.9 mg/m2/day, which is significantly below the EPA licence limit of 350 mg/m2/day (as per Table 3.1). D

4.3 Historic Dust Monitoring Results 4.3.1 37 No. dust monitoring rounds (with 4 No. monitoring points per round) have been

completed at the facility under EPA Licence W0151-01, commencing in Quarter 4, 2003. In that time, the EPA licence limit of 350 mg/m2/day has been exceeded on 5 No. occasions only: at D1 during Q3, 2004, Q2, 2007 and Q3, 2007 and at D3 in Q2, 2007 and Q2, 2015. The overall compliance rate for dust monitoring, since the commencement of dust monitoring at this site, is 96%.

4.4 Conclusion 4.4.1 The dust levels recorded during this monitoring period at the Murphy

Environmental Gormanston facility at sampling locations D1, D2, D3/D3a and D4/D4a/D4b were deemed to be in compliance with the EPA licence W0151-01 limit of 350 mg/m2/day.

4.4.2 It is recommended that Murphy Environmental continue to employ the use of dust

control measures in and around the site, e.g. sprinklers, bowsers and roadsweepers, as required, and quarterly dust monitoring is continued

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Appendix

1

Appendix 1: Field Monitoring Records

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

Sampling Sheet for Dust Q2, 2016

[NOTE]: Type A Bottle: ‘Old’ bottle. Large, white plastic. Opening diameter: 8.8cm Type B Bottle: ‘New’ bottle. Smaller, clear plastic. Opening diameter: 9.2cm

Client: Murphy Environmental Site: Gormanston Project Code:

MU0122

Date: ON – 30th May 2016 OFF – 28th June 2016

Time: 11am 11am

Consultant(s):

KF/CT VSP/LM

Monitoring Point Ref. Start Date End Date Bottle Type Notes

D1 30/05/2016 28/06/2016 A

D2 30/05/2016 28/06/2016 A

D3a 30/05/2016 28/06/2016 A

D4b 30/05/2016 28/06/2016 A

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Appendix

2

Appendix 2: Chain of Custody Documentation

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Appendix

3

Appendix 3: Laboratory Results

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

Unit 7-8 Hawarden Business Park

Manor Road (off Manor Lane)

Hawarden

Deeside

CH5 3US

Tel: (01244) 528700

Fax: (01244) 528701

email: [email protected]

Website: www.alcontrol.com


Sarsfieldtown

Gormanstown

Co. Meath

Attention: Kerstie Flanagan

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Location:

Your Reference:

Sample Delivery Group (SDG):

Customer:

Date: 12 July 2016

D_MURPHENV_GMT

160706-111

MU0122

Gormanston

We received 4 samples on Tuesday July 05, 2016 and 4 of these samples were scheduled for analysis which was

completed on Tuesday July 12, 2016. Accredited laboratory tests are defined within the report, but opinions,

interpretations and on-site data expressed herein are outside the scope of ISO 17025 accreditation.

Should this report require incorporation into client reports, it must be used in its entirety and not simply with the data

sections alone.

All chemical testing (unless subcontracted) is performed at ALcontrol Hawarden Laboratories.

Report No: 368760

Operations Manager

Sonia McWhan

Approved By:

Alcontrol Laboratories is a trading division of ALcontrol UK Limited

Registered Office: Units 7 & 8 Hawarden Business Park, Manor Road, Hawarden, Deeside, CH5 3US. Registered in England and Wales No.

Page 1 of 7

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISSDG:

Job:

Client Reference:

160706-111

MU0122

Location:

Customer:

Attention:

Order Number:

Report Number:D_MURPHENV_GMT-7 Murphy EnvironmentalGormanston

Kerstie Flanagan

368760

Superseded Report:

Validated

Received Sample OverviewSampled DateLab Sample No(s) Customer Sample Ref. AGS Ref. Depth (m)

13721334 D1 28/06/2016

13721335 D2 28/06/2016

13721336 D3A 28/06/2016

13721337 D4A 28/06/2016

Only received samples which have had analysis scheduled will be shown on the following pages.

16:19:59 12/07/2016

Page 2 of 7

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54


Job:

Client Reference:

160706-111

MU0122

Location:

Customer:

Attention:

Order Number:


Kerstie Flanagan

368760

Superseded Report:

Validated

LIQUID

Results Legend

X Test

NNo Determination

Possible

Lab Sample No(s)

Customer

Sample Reference

Depth (m)

Container

AGS Reference

13

721

33

413

721

33

513

721

33

613

721

33

7

D1

D2

D3

AD

4A

Dust C

onta

ine

rD

ust C

onta

ine

rD

ust C

onta

ine

rD

ust C

onta

ine

rDust All NDPs: 0

Tests: 4

X

X

X

X

16:19:59 12/07/2016

Page 3 of 7

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54


Job:

Client Reference:

160706-111

MU0122

Location:

Customer:

Attention:

Order Number:


Kerstie Flanagan

368760

Superseded Report:

Validated

ISO17025 accredited.

mCERTS accredited.

Aqueous / settled sample.

Dissolved / filtered sample.

Total / unfiltered sample.

Subcontracted test.

% recovery of the surrogate standard to

check the efficiency of the method. The

results of individual compounds within

samples aren't corrected for the recovery

Trigger breach confirmed

Sample deviation (see appendix)

#

M

aq

diss.filt

tot.unfilt

*

**

(F)

1-5&♦§@

Results Legend

AGS Reference

Lab Sample No.(s)

SDG Ref

Date Received

Date Sampled

Sample Type

Depth (m)

Customer Sample R

MethodLOD/UnitsComponent

Sample Time

D1

.

Water(GW/SW)

28/06/2016

.

05/07/2016

160706-111

13721334

D2

.

Water(GW/SW)

28/06/2016

.

05/07/2016

160706-111

13721335

D3A

.

Water(GW/SW)

28/06/2016

.

05/07/2016

160706-111

13721336

D4A

.

Water(GW/SW)

28/06/2016

.

05/07/2016

160706-111

13721337

Dust, Total

mg/m2/day

TM253 11.7

200

25.6

47.2

Dust Collected, Total <0.1 mg TM253 2.12

36

4.62

8.52

16:19:59 12/07/2016

Page 4 of 7

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54


Job:

Client Reference:

160706-111

MU0122

Location:

Customer:

Attention:

Order Number:


Kerstie Flanagan

368760

Superseded Report:

Validated

Table of Results - AppendixMethod No Reference Description

Wet/Dry

Sample ¹

Surrogate

Corrected

TM253 Dust is collected either using a “Frisbee”

collector this is the “Stockholm” method or using

a “jam jar” collector, this is the “Berghoff”

method.

The Determination of Dust

¹ Applies to Solid samples only. DRY indicates samples have been dried at 35°C. NA = not applicable.

16:19:59 12/07/2016

Page 5 of 7

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54


Job:

Client Reference:

160706-111

MU0122

Location:

Customer:

Attention:

Order Number:


Kerstie Flanagan

368760

Superseded Report:

Validated

Test Completion DatesLab Sample No(s)

Customer Sample Ref.

Depth

Type

AGS Ref.

13721334 13721335 13721336 13721337

D1 D2 D3A D4A

LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID

Dust 12-Jul-2016 12-Jul-2016 12-Jul-2016 12-Jul-2016

16:19:59 12/07/2016

Page 6 of 7

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SDG:Job:

Client Reference:

160706-111

MU0122

Location:Customer:

Attention:

Order Number:Report Number:D_MURPHENV_GMT-7 Murphy Environmental

Gormanston

Kerstie Flanagan

368760

Superseded Report:

Appendix1. Results are expressed on a dry weight basis (dried at 35ºC) for all soil analyses except

for the following: NRA and CEN Leach tests, flash point LOI, pH, ammonium as NH4 by the

BRE method, VOC TICs and SVOC TICs.

2. Samples will be run in duplicate upon request, but an additional charge may be incurred.

3. If sufficient sample is received a sub sample will be retained free of charge for 30 days

after analysis is completed (e-mailed) for all sample types unless the sample is destroyed

on testing. The prepared soil sub sample that is analysed for asbestos will be retained for a

period of 6 months after the analysis date. All bulk samples will be retained for a period of 6

months after the analysis date. All samples received and not scheduled will be disposed of

one month after the date of receipt unless we are instructed to the contrary. Once the initial

period has expired, a storage charge will be applied for each month or part thereof until the

client cancels the request for sample storage. ALcontrol Laboratories reserve the right to

charge for samples received and stored but not analysed.

4. With respect to turnaround, we will always endeavour to meet client requirements

wherever possible, but turnaround times cannot be absolutely guaranteed due to so many

variables beyond our control.

5. We take responsibility for any test performed by sub -contractors (marked with an

asterisk). We endeavour to use UKAS/MCERTS Accredited Laboratories, who either

complete a quality questionnaire or are audited by ourselves. For some determinands there

are no UKAS/MCERTS Accredited Laboratories, in this instance a laboratory with a known

track record will be utilised.

6. When requested, the individual sub sample scheduled will be analysed in house for the

presence of asbestos fibres and asbestos containing material by our documented in house

method TM048 based on HSG 248 (2005), which is accredited to ISO17025. If a specific

asbestos fibre type is not found this will be reported as “Not detected”. If no asbestos fibre

types are found all will be reported as “Not detected” and the sub sample analysed deemed

to be clear of asbestos. If an asbestos fibre type is found it will be reported as detected (for

each fibre type found). Testing can be carried out on asbestos positive samples, but, due

to Health and Safety considerations, may be replaced by alternative tests or reported as No

Determination Possible (NDP). The quantity of asbestos present is not determined unless

specifically requested.

7. If no separate volatile sample is supplied by the client, or if a headspace or sediment is

present in the volatile sample, the integrity of the data may be compromised. This will be

flagged up as an invalid VOC on the test schedule and the result marked as deviating on

the test certificate.

8. If appropriate preserved bottles are not received preservation will take place on receipt .

However, the integrity of the data may be compromised.

9. NDP - No determination possible due to insufficient /unsuitable sample.

10. Metals in water are performed on a filtered sample, and therefore represent dissolved

metals - total metals must be requested separately.

11. Results relate only to the items tested.

12. LoDs (Limit of Detection) for wet tests reported on a dry weight basis are not corrected

for moisture content.

13. Surrogate recoveries - Surrogates are added to your sample to monitor recovery of

the test requested. A % recovery is reported, results are not corrected for the recovery

measured. Typical recoveries for organics tests are 70-130%, they are generally wider for

volatiles analysis, 50-150%. Recoveries in soils are affected by organic rich or clay rich

matrices. Waters can be affected by remediation fluids or high amounts of sediment . Test

results are only ever reported if all of the associated quality checks pass; it is assumed

that all recoveries outside of the values above are due to matrix affect .

14. Product analyses - Organic analyses on products can only be semi -quantitative due to

the matrix effects and high dilution factors

employed.

15. Phenols monohydric by HPLC include phenol, cresols (2-Methylphenol, 3-Methylphenol

and 4-Methylphenol) and Xylenols (2,3 Dimethylphenol, 2,4 Dimethylphenol, 2,5

Dimethylphenol, 2,6 Dimethylphenol, 3,4 Dimethyphenol, 3,5 Dimethylphenol).

16. Total of 5 speciated phenols by HPLC includes Phenol, 2,3,5-Trimethyl Phenol,

2-Isopropylphenol, Cresols and Xylenols (as detailed in 15).

17. Stones/debris are not routinely removed. We always endeavour to take a

representative sub sample from the received sample.

18. In certain circumstances the method detection limit may be elevated due to the sample

being outside the calibration range. Other factors that may contribute to this include

possible interferences. In both cases the sample would be diluted which would cause the

method detection limit to be raised.

19. Mercury results quoted on soils will not include volatile mercury as the analysis is

performed on a dried and crushed sample.

Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Materials & Soils

The results for identification of asbestos in bulk materials are obtained from supplied bulk

materials which have been examined to determine the presence of asbestos fibres using

ALcontrol Laboratories (Hawarden) in-house method of transmitted/polarised light

microscopy and central stop dispersion staining, based on HSG 248 (2005).

The results for identification of asbestos in soils are obtained from a homogenised sub

sample which has been examined to determine the presence of asbestos fibres using

ALcontrol Laboratories (Hawarden) in-house method of transmitted/polarised light

microscopy and central stop dispersion staining, based on HSG 248 (2005).

-Fibrous Tremolite

-Fibrous Anthophyllite

-Fibrous Actinolite

Blue AsbestosCrocidolite

Brown AsbestosAmosite

White AsbestosChrysotile

Common NameAsbestos Type

-Fibrous Tremolite

-Fibrous Anthophyllite

-Fibrous Actinolite

Blue AsbestosCrocidolite

Brown AsbestosAmosite

White AsbestosChrysotile

Common NameAsbestos Type

Visual Estimation Of Fibre Content

Estimation of fibre content is not permitted as part of our UKAS accredited test other than :

- Trace - Where only one or two asbestos fibres were identified.

Further guidance on typical asbestos fibre content of manufactured products can be

found in HSG 264.

The identification of asbestos containing materials and soils falls within our

schedule of tests for which we hold UKAS accreditation, however opinions,

interpretations and all other information contained in the report are outside the

scope of UKAS accreditation.

Sample DeviationsContainer with Headspace provided for volatiles analysis

Incorrect container received

Deviation from method

Holding time exceeded before sample received

Samples exceeded holding time before presevation was performed

Sampled on date not provided

Sample holding time exceeded in laboratory

Sample holding time exceeded due to sampled on date

Sample Holding Time exceeded - Late arrival of instructions.

Asbestos

General20. For the BSEN 12457-3 two batch process to allow the cumulative release to be

calculated, the volume of the leachate produced is measured and filtered for all tests. We

therefore cannot carry out any unfiltered analysis. The tests affected include volatiles

GCFID/GCMS and all subcontracted analysis.

21. For leachate preparations other than Zero Headspace Extraction (ZHE) volatile loss

may occur.

22. We are accredited to MCERTS for sand, clay and loam/topsoil, or any of these

materials - whether these are derived from naturally occurring soil profiles, or from fill /made

ground, as long as these materials constitute the major part of the sample. Other coarse

granular material such as concrete, gravel and brick are not accredited if they comprise the

major part of the sample.

23. Analysis and identification of specific compounds using GCFID is by retention time

only, and we routinely calibrate and quantify for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzenes and

xylenes (BTEX). For total volatiles in the C5-C12 range, the total area of the chromatogram

is integrated and expressed as ug/kg or ug/l. Although this analysis is commonly used for

the quantification of gasoline range organics (GRO), the system will also detect other

compounds such as chlorinated solvents, and this may lead to a falsely high result with

respect to hydrocarbons only. It is not possible to specifically identify these

non-hydrocarbons, as standards are not routinely run for any other compounds, and for

more definitive identification, volatiles by GCMS should be utilised.

24. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) are non-target peaks in VOC and SVOC

analysis. All non-target peaks detected with a concentration above the LoD are subjected

to a mass spectral library search. Non-target peaks with a library search confidence of

>75% are reported based on the best mass spectral library match. When a non-target

peak with a library search confidence of <75% is detected it is reported as “mixed

hydrocarbons”. Non-target compounds identified from the scan data are semi-quantified

relative to one of the deuterated internal standards, under the same chromatographic

conditions as the target compounds. This result is reported as a semi-quantitative value

and reported as Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs). TICs are outside the scope of

UKAS accreditation and are not moisture corrected.

1

2

3

4

5

§

♦

@

&

16:20:13 12/07/2016 12/07/2016Modification Date:

Page 7 of 7

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Appendix

4

Appendix 4: Dust Monitoring Calculations

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

PATEL TONRA LTD3f Fingal Bay Business Park, Balbriggan, Co. Dublin. Tel. 01 8020520www.pateltonra.com

DUST MONITORING CALCULATIONS

Client: Murphy Environmental

Site: Gormanston

Reference: MU0122

Dust Monitoring Period - 30 Days

Start date: 30/05/2016 End date: 28/06/2016

Lab Analysis by: Alcontrol

Results dated: 12/07/2016 Lab Ref: 368760

Bottle Type Lab Result (mg/volume

sampled)

Surface Area Sampled (m2)

Sampling Period

(number of days)

mg/m2/day

D1 A 2.12 0.0061 30.0 11.62

D2 A 36 0.0061 30.0 197.30

D3a A 4.62 0.0061 30.0 25.32

D4a A 8.52 0.0061 30.0 46.69

TYPE 'A' TYPE 'B'

Diameter of bottle (cm) 8.80 9.20

Radius of bottle (cm) 4.40 4.60

Pi 3.142 3.142

Area = r*r*pi (cm2) 60.82 66.48

Area (m2) 0.0061 0.0066

Calculations by: Kerstie Flanagan Date: 13/07/2016

SURFACE AREA OF DUST BOTTLE

For in

spec

tion p

urpo

ses o

nly.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54



Figure

1

Figure 1: Monitoring Locations Drawing

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

D3a

D4a

SWD-1

b

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 12-09-2016:02:46:54

louise

Rectangle

louise

Rectangle

louise

Rectangle

louise

Oval

louise

Rectangle

louise

Rectangle

louise

Oval

louise

Rectangle

louise

Oval

Murphy Environmental Dust Monitoring Report for …Environmental Dust Monitoring Report for...

Documents

Transcript of Murphy Environmental Dust Monitoring Report for …Environmental Dust Monitoring Report for...