Mulyankan Team E

download Mulyankan Team E

of 32

Transcript of Mulyankan Team E

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    1/35

    Consolidation in Indian Banking

    Industry - The M&A way

    Team E

    Mulyankan 2010

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    2/35

    ns

    1. Banking Industry Analysis SWOT Analysis and Challenges

    Why Consolidation

    2. Basis ofSelecting Banks

    3. Key Projections

    4. Valuation

    5.Strength of merged Entity

    6. Potential Vulnerabilities

    Geographical and other Synergies

    Strength of merged entity

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank

    Consolidated

    Assumptions

    Calculations

    Key Ratios

    Issues faced by merged entity

    Contents

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    3/35

    Low per capitapenetration

    Opened up foreignmarkets

    Insurance, Mutual Fundand DP services

    SWOT of Indian banking Sector

    Efficiency and Productsdo not match global

    standards

    Strength more reflectiveof economies of scale

    Low per capita GDP

    Prevalence of paper-

    based payment systems

    FavorableMacroeconomic factors

    High Savings Rate andstability

    Immune to volatility inglobal market

    Low development ofstructured products.

    High sensitivity ofprofits to interest ratefluctuations.

    Further deregulationand competition on thecards

    T

    T S

    S

    W

    WO

    O

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    4/35

    Challenges Faced by Indian Banking SectorsDeregulation and Changing customer behavior

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    5/35

    Indian Banking SectorConsolidation is the way ahead

    Make up of an Indian Banking behemoth

    Financial Inclusion of Rural India, Increase in NW and EV, ReduceCompetition, increased market power, reduced earnings volatility

    Expansion of the banks network

    Fits in the scheme of things of RBI

    Increased access to Capital Markets, better implementation andexecution of monetary policy changes, improving quality andefficiency in performance, improvement in service deliverychannels, global trend, economies of scale, economies of scope

    Expansion is the need of the hour

    Cost effectiveness, increase in market share, increase instakeholders value, cross selling of products, utilization of complementary assets, sustaining competitivepressure, operational efficiency and profitability

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    6/35

    ns

    1. Banking Industry Analysis SWOT Analysis and Challenges

    Why Consolidation

    2. Basis ofSelecting Banks

    3. Key Projections

    4. Valuation

    5.Strength of merged Entity

    6. Potential Vulnerabilities

    Geographical and other Synergies

    Strength of merged entity

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank

    Consolidated

    Assumptions

    Calculations

    Key Ratios

    Issues faced by merged entity

    Contents

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    7/35

    Basis ofSelecting Banks -Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank

    Geographical Synergies:

    Bank of Baroda 3rd largest PSU bank in India Syndicate bank - 8th largest PSU bank in India

    Places where bank wouldwant to reach after merger

    Places where banks arealready present

    P6

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    8/35

    Slide 7

    P6 added Syndicate here

    Changed the figure

    Pallav, 10/2/2010

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    9/35

    Improving Geographical PenetrationStrong Pan India Presence

    AP, 312

    TN, 183Kerala, 102

    Karnataka, 617UP, 210

    Maharashtra, 156

    Delhi, 152

    Rest Of India, 450

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    10/35

    Synergies contd..

    Merged Entity would become 2nd largest PSB

    Value migration from BOB to Syndicate Bank ` 83.96 EPS(BoB 2010) > `15.58 EPS(Syndicate Bank2010)

    Better penetration into the SME and Microfinance sector lending Sarthee, SME Charter, Gift ofVision

    Enhancing Investment banking activity and product mix BarodaPioneer, Baroda Health, IndiaFirst Life Insurance

    Cultural Diversity to be used as strength

    Total Balance Sheet size of Consolidated entity wouldincrease, thus helping them to become 2nd largest public sector

    bankBank Year Balance Sheet Size

    PNB 2010 ` 435930 crs.

    Bank Of Baroda 2010 ` 416079 crs.

    Merged Entity 2011 ` 748817 crs

    PNB 2011 ` 516412 crs. Source:Annual ReportsFY10

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    11/35

    Integration reducing the costs

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank - InformationTechnology,

    BoB has a base of 270 branches which offer depositoryparticipant services

    Syndicate bank - currently limited to 10 branches (poised to

    gain from the much advanced technology platform of Bank ofBaroda)

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate bank - Data Centres

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate bank - Capacity

    Needs to be increased but cost will be much lower thanmaintaining two data centres in Mumbai.

    A Central DB > result in cost savings

    P10

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    12/35

    Slide 10

    P10 1. Point 1 should show that BOB has a incentive, and not synidcate has a incentive

    2. 2&3 points not clear enoughPallav, 10/2/2010

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    13/35

    NavNirman and Baroda NextSyndicate would be a part of new strategies

    BoB 1 BoB 2 BoB 3 BoB 4

    Syndicate1

    NavNirman Business Process

    Reengineering and Organizational

    Restructuring

    Harness power of Technology

    Alignment ofProcesses

    Enterprise wide Sales Orientation

    Process Simplification

    Syndicate2

    Syndicate3

    P12

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    14/35

    Slide 11

    P12 not much given about navnirmaan process on net,

    useless to dedicate a full slide herePallav, 10/2/2010

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    15/35

    Other Advantages

    Bigger Entity Better returns

    Mode of Functioning of Banks BoB (Aggressive)

    Reinforcement of Brand Image of Bank of Baroda

    Better Market image and Brand Value

    Better Valuation and better shareholder returns

    Better bargaining power of the entity

    Greater geographical penetration, enhanced market image andother synergic factors

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    16/35

    ns

    1. Banking Industry Analysis SWOT Analysis and Challenges

    Why Consolidation

    2. Basis ofSelecting Banks

    3. Key Projections

    4. Valuation

    5.Strength of merged Entity

    6. Potential Vulnerabilities

    Geographical and other Synergies

    Strength of merged entity

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank

    Consolidated

    Assumptions

    Calculations

    Key Ratios

    Issues faced by merged entity

    Contents

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    17/35

    Projected BS and PL Key Assumptions

    If Growth Rates are NA then the values are projected based on Forecast function in

    excel

    Advances Credit growth to be 23% (BoB) & 16%(SB)

    YOY Deposit Growth Rate 22% (BoB) 15% (Syndicate bank)

    Repo Rate and Reverse Repo 4.75% and 5.5%

    Other Liabilities taking forecast from 2 years

    Average cash with RBI/ Deposit ratio5.5% (BoB) and 7%(SB)(Assuming it to be

    constant)

    Average Balance with other banks /

    Deposits

    8.3% (BoB) and 4%(SB) (Assuming it to be

    constant)

    Fixed AssetsAs banks does not depend much on fixedassets so assuming it to be constant.

    Interest Rates on Advances7.5%-7.9% in 3 years (BoB) and 8.0% -

    8.4%(SB)

    Interest Rates on Deposits 4.5% (BoB) and 5.7% (SB)

    Net NPA / Total Assets 0.2% (BoB) and 0.6% (SB)

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    18/35

    Projected BoB BS & PL key elementsReturn on net worth increasing to 28%.

    In ` crs. Mar 10 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13

    Deposits 2,41,044.26 2,94,074.00 3,58,770.28 4,37,699.74

    Advances 1,75,035.29 2,15,293.41 2,64,810.89 3,25,717.39

    Investments 6,11,82.37 69,933.50 78,662.70 87,391.90

    Reported NetProfit 3

    ,058.33 4,220.16 6,788.45 8,181.33

    Return on NW 20.24% 23.23% 30.32% 28.04%

    NIM 2.18% 2.34% 2.84% 2.75%

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    19/35

    Bank Of Baroda - Key Financial InformationMaintaining a healthy CRAR

    BOB Mar 10 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13

    Cost Of Equity 16.10% 16.10% 16.10% 16.10%

    Deposit as % of

    Liabilities

    86.6 88.2 89.5 90.9

    Credit Deposit

    ratio0.726 0.732 0.738 0.744

    Tier 1 Capital

    (Rs. Cr)15,838.95 19,148.59 23,718.49 30,974.87

    Tier 2 Capital

    (Rs. Cr)7,274.64 7,242.49 7,210.89 7,179.29

    RWA 2,08,737.53 2,49,852.35 3,00,340.75 3,60,870.13

    CRAR % 11.07 10.56 10.29 10.57

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    20/35

    Projected Syndicate Bank BS & PL key elements

    Net profit almost doubles in 3 years.

    In ` crs. Mar 10 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13

    Deposits 1,17,025.79 1,34,579.66 1,54,766.61 1,77,981.60

    Borrowings 12,172.69 13,181.58 13,284.82 13186.57

    Advances 90,406.36 1,04,871.38 1,21,650.80 1,41,114.93

    Investments 33,010.93 35,662.54 38,241.75 40,820.95

    Reported NetProfit

    813.32 1,084.80 1,276.04 1,506.72

    RoNW 15.57% 18.16% 18.3% 18.49%

    NIM 2.01% 2.02% 1.97% 1.94%

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    21/35

    Syndicate Bank- Key Financial Information

    Syndicate Mar 10 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13

    Cost Of Equity 15.65% 15.65% 15.65% 15.65%

    Deposit as % of

    Liabilities84.1 84.7 85.8 86.8

    Credit Deposit

    ratio0.772 0.779 0.786 0.792

    Tier 1 Capital

    (Rs. Cr)5,406.06 6,185.51 7,225.61 8,449.29

    Tier 2 Capital(Rs. Cr)

    4,612.81 4,954.95 5,318.61 5,697.42

    RWA (Rs. Cr) 1,04,288.21 1,19,029.60 1,35,270.15 1,53,774.06

    CRAR % 9.60% 9.35% 9.27% 9.20%

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    22/35

    Projected BS and PL Merger Entity

    Key Assumptions

    Sum of both the entries is taken where assumptions are not given

    Advances Syndicate Bank rate would increase by one

    percentage point from 2nd year.

    Fee Income It would increase by 10 percentage points in

    second and third year of merger

    Operating Expense Because of economies of scale operatingexpense would decrease by around 10% from

    2nd year of merger

    Provision for doubtful loans and contingencies Decrease by 10% from 2nd year of merger

    Other Liabilities Taking forecast from 2 years

    Interest Rates on Advances Interest rate of 8 % average of both the banks

    on advances

    Fixed Assets Because of clubbing of some branches fixed

    assets of syndicate bank would reduce by 10%

    points.

    Net NPA 0.3% of Total Assets

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    23/35

    Projected Consolidated BS & PL

    Key elements

    In ` crs. 2011 2012 2013

    Deposits 4,28,653.66 5,13,536.89 6,15,681.34

    Borrowings 26,355.80 21,052.27 22,038.931

    Advances 3,20,164.78 3,87,510.40 4,70,502.82

    Investments 1,05,596.04 1,16,904.45 1,28,212.86

    Reported Net Profit 5,691.44 8,663.98 10,200.43

    RoA 1.16% 1.49% 1.48%

    NIM 2.35% 2.61% 2.48%

    CRAR 9.012% 9.185% 9.812%

    RONW 23.58% 30.32% 28.30%

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    24/35

    ns

    1. Banking Industry Analysis SWOT Analysis and Challenges

    Why Consolidation

    2. Basis ofSelecting Banks

    3. Key Projections

    4. Valuation

    5.Strength of merged Entity

    6. Potential Vulnerabilities

    Geographical and other Synergies

    Strength of merged entity

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank

    Consolidated

    Assumptions

    Calculations

    Key Ratios

    Issues faced by merged entity

    Contents

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    25/35

    Valuation - Assumptions

    Basic CAPM model is used to calculate Cost ofEquity

    Beta is assumed to be same as that for FY2010 for Bank ofBaroda and Syndicate bank and for the merged entity it is sameas Bank of Baroda

    Risk free rate is assumed to be 8%

    The market Risk premium is considered as 17%

    Net profit is used as a proxy for cash flow.

    Dividend discount model is used to calculate net present value

    Synergies are calculated based on thee year projections

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    26/35

    Synergy Calculation

    In ` crs. 2011 2012 2013

    BOB

    Net Profit 4,220.16 6,788.45 8,181.33

    Cost of Equity 16.10% 16.10% 16.10%

    NPV 13,899.07

    Syndicate

    Net Profit 1,084.80 1,276.04 1,506.72

    Cost of Equity 15.65% 15.65% 15.65%

    NPV 2,866.13

    Merged

    Net Profit 5,691.44 8,663.98 10,200.43

    Cost of Equity 16.10% 16.10% 16.10%

    NPV 17,847.96

    Synergy: NPV Consolidated - (NPV BoB + NPV Syndicate bank) = 1082.76 CRORES

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    27/35

    Valuation

    BankO

    f BarodaS

    yndicate BankOutstanding Shares 36.25 Crs 49.39 Crs

    52 weeks Trailing Average ` 652.00 `103.50

    Market Capitalization `23632.69 crs `5111.79 crs

    S

    wap Ratio6.3 (1 BOB = 6.3 Syndicate)

    Premium per share ofSyndicate Bank21.93 rs. (Synergy/no. Of

    shares)

    Total Price that can be paid per share (Actual price +

    premium)125.423

    Swap Ratio considering premium 5.198

    Range ofSwap Ratio 5.198 - 6.3

    Market Capitalization ofMerged Entity 29827.240

    Number ofShares after merger 45.747 crores

    Price per share of merged entity 652.000

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    28/35

    Why Stock Payment

    Government has a majority stake in both thebanks

    Most banking mergers in the past have beenstock deals

    The target bank has a stake in the growth of theparent company

    Equity route do not significantly impact cashreserves

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    29/35

    ns

    1. Banking Industry Analysis SWOT Analysis and Challenges

    Why Consolidation

    2. Basis ofSelecting Banks

    3. Key Projections

    4. Valuation

    5.Strength of merged Entity

    6. Potential Vulnerabilities

    Geographical and other Synergies

    Strength of merged entity

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank

    Consolidated

    Assumptions

    Calculations

    Key Ratios

    Issues faced by merged entity

    Contents

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    30/35

    Synergies Key Ratios and Information

    Merged entity provides improved results

    Key Parameters (2011) BOB Syndicate Consolidated

    Business per employee 13.07 cr 8.80 cr 11.31 cr

    Profit per employee 0.10 cr 0.039 cr 0.086 cr

    Interest income/working

    funds6.86% 7.72% 6.90%

    Non-Interest

    income/working funds 1.15% 0.90% 1.03%

    Net NPAs 666.27 cr 977.73 cr 1475.32 cr

    Net NPAs/ Net advances 0.34% 1.07% 0.50%

    Employees 38,960 27,200 66,160

    Number of branches 3305 2270 5348

    Business per branch 154.12 cr 105.48 cr 140.01 cr

    Net profit per branch 1.27 cr 0.47 cr 1.06 cr

    Net profit 4220.46 cr 1084.8 cr 5691.44 cr

    Business 5,09,367 cr 2,39,451.04 cr 7,48,818.44 cr

    Credit-Deposit Ratio 73.22 % 77.9 % 74.69 %

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    31/35

    Risk Spread Sensitivity Analysis

    Key Risk ratios BOB Syndicate Merged(55%) Merged(60%) Merged(65%)

    RWA

    2010 180012.383 78888.740 ----------- ----------- -----------

    2011 236526.892 87288.372 270474.850 295063.47 319652.096

    2012 284322.578 99198.116 319986.212 349075.87 378165.523

    2013 341623.719 112767.64 379385.931 413875.56 448365.192

    CRAR

    (%)

    2010 14.36 12.7 ------------ ------------ ------------

    2011 11.15 12.76 9.832 9.013 8.319

    2012 10.87 12.64 10.021 9.186 8.479

    2013 11.16 12.54 10.704 9.812 9.057

    Assumptions

    Bank of Baroda RWA for 2011 onwards is assumed to be 71% based on last 2 years average

    Syndicate Bank R

    WA for 2011 onwards is assumed to be 55% based on last 2 years average

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    32/35

    ns

    1. Banking Industry Analysis SWOT Analysis and Challenges

    Why Consolidation

    2. Basis ofSelecting Banks

    3. Key Projections

    4. Valuation

    5.Strength of merged Entity

    6. Potential Vulnerabilities

    Geographical and other Synergies

    Strength of merged entity

    Bank of Baroda and Syndicate Bank

    Consolidated

    Assumptions

    Calculations

    Key Ratios

    Potential Issues for merged entity

    Contents

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    33/35

    Merged Entity Potential Vulnerabilities

    Employee unions are averse to mergers due tocost rationalization

    Cross cultural issues

    Degree and scope of integration to the extentforecasted

    Merger likely to impact EPS in the early years

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    34/35

    References

    India Commercial Banking Report Q2 2010 : Business MonitorInternational Ltd

    www.rbidocs.rbi.org.in

    http://www.bankofbaroda.com/

    http://www.syndicatebank.in/

    http://www.capitaline.com/new/index.asp

    Impact of Mergers on the Cost Efficiency of Indian Commercial Banks -Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics 2010 , Pardeep KAUR

    Is Consolidation way to make Indias best banks better - The FinancialExpress 2010

    http://www.utiicm.com/Cmc/PDFs/2002/bpv%5E59.pdf: EVA by IndianBanks

    ICICI Direct Estimate of Bank Of Baroda

    Syndicate Bank Research report - Bajaj Capital Centre for InvestmentResearch

    Commercial Banking at a Glance RBI

    www.moneycontrol.com

  • 8/8/2019 Mulyankan Team E

    35/35

    Thank You

    Contact:

    Team E