Building the assessment matrix

Module 4: The experience of conducting the ABND exercise in IndonesiaILO, 2013Key questionsWhat was the process and timeframe for conducting the ABND in Indonesia?What policy and implementation gaps were identified?What were the results of the RAP exercise in Indonesia?Which stakeholders were involvedAt which level was the ABND conducted?What were some of the lessons from the process and its limitations ?

1234Assessment matrixCosting of scenarios using RAPFinalization of ABND report,endorsement of recommend-ations and RAPLaunch of ABND reportJun 2011 - Aug 2011May-Jul 20125Hands-on training on RAPNov-Dec 2012Sep 2011 -Mar 2012Process and timeframeInternational Labour Conference and Recommendation on SPFs, 2012 (No. 202)Limitations?Policy and implementation gaps in IndonesiaSocial protection programmes and schemes are scattered Benefit levels are lowSocial security coverage for formal sector workers is limitedThere is almost no social protection for informal economy workersEnforcement of the law is poorCost of implementing SPF benefits during expressed as % of GDPResults of RAP in Indonesia

StakeholdersGovernment: Bappenas (ministry of planning and development) as the lead agency, Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration, Ministry of Social Affairs, Ministry of Health, Statistics Bureau

Social security providers: Jamsostek, AskesRegional government: Led by Bappeda (regional planning office)Employers: APINDOWorkers: KSBSI, KSPSI, KSPIAcademicians: PGSD, University of IndonesiaDevelopment partners: UN Sub-Working Group on Social Protection, UNWomen, UNAIDS, UNICEF, WHO, NGOsABND at different levelsNational levelAwareness building on SPF (Indonesian Job Pact, DWCP)Advocacy and bilateral meeting (Vice Presidents office, TNP2K, Bappenas)Consultative meetings (finalizing the assessment matrix)Validation and knowledge sharing workshopsTechnical/endorsement meeting

Provincial level (Maluku, NTT and East Java provinces)Awareness raising on SPFConsultative meetings (finalizing the assessment matrix)Validation workshopsFollow-up meeting for implementation of Single Window ServiceLessons from ABND in IndonesiaABND should be aligned with national priorities: for the development of a comprehensive social security system. This is especially important for financing, extending coverage to informal economy workers, SJSN (National Social Security System), BPJS (Social Security Service Providers) and Poverty Reduction Programme.All relevant stakeholders should be involved from the start: for ownership of the report, to help in endorsement and sustainability. As a result of the ABND, the Maluku and East Java provincial governments earmarked budgets for the SWS implementation, and Jember district made SWS a poverty alleviation strategy.Involving the UN sub-working group and stakeholders: in consultative meetings helps obtain inputs on cross-cutting issues and generate ideas, including for further technical cooperation.Identifying one lead agency: or Ministry to lead the process and buy-in the result is key to endorsement of the ABND recommendations in the national strategy.Lessons from ABND in IndonesiaInvolving the media: through press releases on workshops and meetings, briefings, expert interviews, and radio and TV coverage helps influence public debate and policy development.Unified service proposed for social protection programThe Jakarta Post | National | Thu, December 15 2011

With duplications in social protection programmes delivered by different government agencies, developing a Single Window Service for the beneficiaries was critical to ensure their effectiveness, experts have said.Lessons from ABND in IndonesiaParticipatory vs. extension of the ABND report launch to accommodate more feedback?Reservation of the point of view that the SPF encourages informality instead of the other way aroundHow to make the ABND exercise coherent with Indonesias current social security development programme?Limitations of ABND in Indonesia