Model fitting of high-resolution X-ray Spectroscopy of the Planetary Nebula BD+30◦3639 Young Sam...
-
date post
20-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Model fitting of high-resolution X-ray Spectroscopy of the Planetary Nebula BD+30◦3639 Young Sam...
Model fitting of high-resolution X-ray Spectroscopy of the
Planetary Nebula BD+30◦3639
Young Sam Yu, Joel KastnerRochester Institute of Technology, USA
John HouckMassachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Ehud Behar, Raanan Nordon, Noam SokerTechnion-Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
What are planetary nebulae (PNe)?
• Last stages of evolution for stars of initial mass(1-8M⊙)
• Unveiled central star has terminated its asymptotic giant branch (AGB) evolution
• Ejected AGB envelope is ionized by central stellar UV radiation and has yet to disperse entirely
• The remnant carbon-oxygen core will become a white dwarf
Various morphologies of PNe
Optical images in red/green (mostly from
HST)
X-ray images in blue (XMM & Chandra)
X-ray/visual image overlays by M. Guerrero
Montage by B. Balick
Stellar evolution along the HR diagram
From Herwig (2005, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.)
X-ray emission from PNe
• Photoionized gas in PNe is far too cool to emit X-rays• The central stars are at best source of very soft X-rays
• Theorists have long predicted “X-ray emitting gas (hot bubble) comes from wind interactions”Possible scenarios:
- Shocked fast wind (~700-2000 km/s) from central star rams into the ejected red giant envelope that is coasting outward at ~10km/s- Collimated fast winds or jets blown in conjunction with the companion to the central star (e.g. NGC 7027)
=> X-ray observations are essential to verify & distinguish scenarios
The planetary nebula BD+30°3639
Top left : Optical (HST WFPC2 in [S III] at 9532A) (Arnaud et al. 1996)Top right : infrared (Gemini at 2.2 microns (K band) )Bottom left : Chandra Image (ACIS-S3)Bottom right : Chandra spectrum (ACIS- S3) (Kastner et al. 2000)
Basic data:
Distance from Earth : 1.2 kpcDimensions: 4 X 5’’ (~0.02 pc)Dynamical age : less than 1000yr
Central Star: Carbon-rich Wolf-Rayet typeTemp : 30,000KMass loss rate : ~10-6 Msolar/ yrWind speed: ~700 km/s
Previous results from X-ray CCD spectroscopy: Fitting models to BD+30°3639 spectra
* NH constrained by AV for PSPC and SIS model fits
telescope (instrument)
NH (1021 cm-2)
TX (106 K) abundances reference
ROSAT (PSPC) 1.4* 2.5 …Kreysing et al
(1992)
ASCA (SIS) 1.2* 3.0C greatly enhanced;
N, Ne enhanced;
Fe depleted
Arnaud et al. (1996)
Chandra (ACIS) 1.0 2.7C, Ne enhanced;
Fe depletedKastner et al.
(2000)
Chandra (ACIS) 2.5 2.1C, Ne greatly enhanced;
N, O enhanced;
Fe depleted
Maness et al. (2003)
Chandra (ACIS)
SUZAKU
2.0
2.1
2.4
2.2
No useful constraints!
C, N, Ne greatly enhanced;
Fe depleted
Georgiev et al. (2006)
Murashima et al.
(2006)
Chandra observation of BD+30°3639
• BD+30°3639 is the best target for getting high resolution X-ray grating spectroscopy due to its large X-ray flux at Earth.
We decided to use LETG/ACIS-S combination (rather than HETG/ACIS-S)after conducting MARX simulations
Chandra observation of BD+30°3639
Observation ID
Date Instrument Exp (ks)
1st order counts
5409
7278
Feb. 13. 2006
Mar. 22. 2006
LETG/ACIS-S
LETG/ACIS-S
85.4
61.8
1742
1231
5410
8495
8498
Dec. 21. 2006
Dec. 22. 2006
Dec. 24. 2006
LETG/ACIS-S
LETG/ACIS-S
LETG/ACIS-S
53.9
77.1
19.9
1043
1480
386
Total: 298.1 5882
We were granted 300ks observing time for Chandra Cycle 6.
High resolution X-ray spectroscopy of BD+30°3639
Extracted spectrum result from 5 split datasets
Model fitting result with APED
NeIX FeXVII OVIII OVII CVI
Model fitting result with APED
CVI
Results
• Temperature of shocked plasma: T ~ 2.25x106 K
• Hydrogen column density : log NH (cm-2) = 21.4
• Plasma abundances, relative to solar: – C/O ~ 49.3 (yes, C is very overabundant!)– Ne/O ~ 4.5 (yes, Ne is overabundant)– Fe/O ~ 0.3 (yes, Fe is quite depleted!)– N/O ~ 0.3 (yes, N is quite depleted)
The inner layers of a highly
evolved star
From Herwig (2005, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.)
AGB stars are carbon factories!
Interpretation• X-ray temperature (Tx)
– lower than expected from a simple adiabatic shock model (700 km/s wind should produce a few x 10 million degree plasma)
– Possible scenarios• Heat conduction moderates Tx • Shocked wind presently seen in X-rays was ejected at earlier epoch, when the
“fast wind” was slower (~400km/s)
• C/O overabundance– He shell burning and subsequent dredge-up (AGB “third dredge-up”) brings intershell
products (C, s-process elements) to the surface
• Ne/O over abundance– α capture process(α : He)
• 14N + α -> 18O(Burnt in He shell burning) -> 22Ne 18F
• Fe/O, N/O depletion– s-process within pulse-driven convection zone(PDCZ) ), associated He shell burning– 22Ne is neutron source in s-process and make Fe depletion
=> non-solar composition of shocked gas originated from intershell region of AGB star
Summary
• Chandra provides unique means for studying origin of X-ray-emitting gas in Planetary nebulae
• Sharply non-solar composition of shocked gas originated from intershell region of AGB star
• Our preliminary results can provide strong constraints on shock and AGB interior models
• To further understand morphologies and density structures of X-ray-emitting plasmas in PNe, we need to develop 3D volumetric model based on these results