Minnesota’s New Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day...
-
Upload
loraine-rich -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Minnesota’s New Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day...
Minnesota’s NewAccountability System
“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
education.state.mn.us
• ALL schools will be given an annual Multiple Measurements Rating (MMR)
• MMR consists of four measurements:– Proficiency– Student Growth– Achievement Gap Closure– Graduation Rate
2
Multiple Measurements
• Each domain is worth 25 points.• The MMR is generated by dividing the total
number of points earned by the total number of points possible.
• For most elementary and middle schools, 75 points possible. For most high schools 100 points possible.
• The MMR is a 0-100 percentage for all schools.
Total MMR
Total Focus Rating
• In addition to an MMR, every school gets a Focus Rating
• The Focus Rating measures proficiency and growth of minority students and students receiving special services (EL, Special Ed, Free and Reduced Price Lunch)
• Focus Rating combines Achievement Gap reduction and Focused Proficiency
• Each Domain is worth 25 points, for 50 possible points
education.state.mn.us 5
Multiple Measurement System – Results Page
Multiple Measurement System – Results - Initial 4/30/2012
AYPYear
NCLB ID
DistrictNumber
DistrictType
SchoolNumber
SchoolType
DistrictName
SchoolName
Title12012
SIGSchool MMR FR
MMRDesignation
INITIAL 5000 999901 001 High SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
TWINS SENIOR HIGH N N
63.96%
73.46%
INITIAL 5001 999901 002 Middle SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
VIKINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL N N
17.03%
42.41%
INITIAL 5002 999901 004Elementary School
EXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
TIMBERWOLVES ELEMENTARY Y N
9.54%
32.58% Priority
INITIAL 5003 999901 006Elementary School
EXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
WILD ELEMENTARY N N
57.63%
67.28%
Final Multiple Measurement
Rating
Focus Rating. “How are we doing on the Achievement
Gap?”
Was the school given a designation?
Summary Results - MMR
AYP Year
School Type
District Name School Name
2010 Elementary Exampleville School District
Timberwolves Elementary
2011 Elementary Exampleville School District
Timberwolves Elementary
Initial Elementary Exampleville School District
Timberwolves Elementary
Multiple Measurement Rating
MMR Eligible
MMR Total Points
MMR Poss. Points
MMR
Y 10.2440389 75 13.66%
Y 4.070109445 75 5.43%
Y 14.31414835 150 9.54%
Did your school have sufficient data to be measured?
Which year is being measured, initial is a combination of 2010 and 2011
How many total points did the school earn?
How many points could the school have earned?
Summary Results – Focus Rate
AYP Year
School Type
District Name School Name
2010 Elementary Exampleville School District
Timberwolves Elementary
2011 Elementary Exampleville School District
Timberwolves Elementary
Initial Elementary Exampleville School District
Timberwolves Elementary
FREligible
FR Total Points
FR Poss. Points
FR
Y 6.974060193 50 13.95%
Y 25.60245161 50 51.20%
Y 32.5765118 100 32.58%
Focus Rate
Did your school have sufficient data to be measured?
How many total points did the school earn?
How many points could the school have earned?
• Proficiency domain uses AYP index model.• Schools earn points based on a weighted
percentage of subgroups making AYP.• Weighting is based on the size of subgroups.• Unlike in AYP calculation, in MMR Proficiency,
groups can’t make AYP through Safe Harbor.
Proficiency
Summary Results – Proficiency Domain
AYP Year
School Name
2010 Timberwolves Elementary
2011 Timberwolves Elementary
Initial Timberwolves Elementary
Prof. Max Cell Count
Prof. WPC Making AYP
Prof. Percentile Prof. Points
238 0.64017075 0.343473451 8.586836283
252 0.5335153 0.120650954 3.01627385
Proficiency Domain
How many students were included in the measurement?
What was the weighted percentage of subgroups that hit their AYP target?
What is the school's percentile rank among other schools in the same grade range?
How many MMR points did we earn in this domain? (Percentile Rank x 25)
• Growth measures ability of schools to get students to exceed predicted growth.
• Growth predictions based on students’ last assessment result.
• Predictions generated by looking at two cohorts of students, where they scored one year and where they scored the next year.
• Student growth score based on being above or below prediction.
• School growth score is average of student growth scores.
Growth
Summary Results – Growth Domain
Growth Domain
AYP Year
School Name
2010 Timberwolves Elementary
2011 Timberwolves Elementary
Initial Timberwolves Elementary
Unique Growth Student Count
Growth Zscore Average
Growth Percentile Growth Points
153 -0.231967 0.034131737 0.853293413
158 -0.365409 0.01746988 0.436746988
What is the school's percentile rank among other schools in the same grade range?
How many students were included in the measurement?
What was the average growth score in the school?
How many MMR points did we earn in this domain? (Percentile Rank x 25)
• Measures the ability of schools to get higher levels of growth from lower-performing subgroups than statewide average growth for higher-performing subgroups.
• Growth of individual subgroups of students of color compared to growth of white students, Els compared to non-Els, FRPs compared to non-FRPs, SPED compared to non-SPED.
• Subtract schools’ growth scores for lower-performing groups from statewide averages of higher-performing groups.
• Negative score indicates success.
Achievement Gap Reduction
Summary Results – Achievement Gap Domain
AYP Year
School Name
2010 Timberwolves Elementary
2011 Timberwolves Elementary
Initial Timberwolves Elementary
Gap Unique Student Count
Gap AGR Score Gap Percentile Gap Points
82 0.461564 0.032156368 0.803909206
92 0.54205387 0.024683544 0.617088608
Achievement Gap Domain
What is the school's percentile rank among other schools in the same grade range?
How many students were included in the measurement?
How many MMR points did we earn in this domain? (Percentile Rank x 25)
What was our Achievement Gap reduction score? (Negative score is good.)
• Uses same methodology as Proficiency domain.• Looks at the percentage of subgroups that made
AYP in graduation rate.• Current AYP grad rate targets are 85%.• Targets are changing next year.• Groups can only get credit for meeting the
target, not through year-to-year improvements.
Graduation Rate
Summary Results – Graduation Rate Domain
AYP Year
School Name
2010 Twins Senior High
2011 Twins Senior High
Initial Twins Senior High
Grad Max Cell Count
Grad WPC Making AYP
Grad Percentile Grad Points
127 1 0.998360656 24.95901639
145 1 0.99829932 24.95748299
Graduation Rate Domain
AYP Year
School Name
2010 Timberwolves Elementary
2011 Timberwolves Elementary
Initial Timberwolves Elementary
Grad Max Cell Count
Grad WPC Making AYP
Grad Percentile Grad Points
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
What is the school's percentile rank among other schools in the same grade range?
How many students were included in the measurement?
How many MMR points did we earn in this domain? (Percentile Rank x 25)
What was the weighted percentage of subgroups that hit their AYP target?
Focused Proficiency
• Like Proficiency Domain, Focused Proficiency uses AYP index model.
• Schools earn points based on a weighted percentage of subgroups making AYP – but excludes the All Students subgroup and the White subgroup.
• Weighting is based on the size of subgroups.
Focused Proficiency Domain
AYP Year
School Name
2010 Timberwolves Elementary
2011 Timberwolves Elementary
Initial Timberwolves Elementary
Focus Max Cell Count
Focus WPC Making AYP
Focus Percentile Focus Points
94 0 0.246806039 6.170150987
105 1 0.99941452 24.985363
Focused Proficiency Domain
What is the school's percentile rank among other schools in the same grade range?
How many students were included in the measurement?
How many MMR points did we earn in this domain? (Percentile Rank x 25)
What was the weighted percentage of subgroups measured for AGR that hit their AYP target?
education.state.mn.us 18
MMR Designations
Multiple Measurement System – Results - Initial 4/30/2012
AYPYear
NCLB ID
DistrictNumber
DistrictType
SchoolNumber
SchoolType
DistrictName
SchoolName
Title12012
SIGSchool MMR FR
MMRDesignation
INITIAL 5000 999901 001 High SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
TWINS SENIOR HIGH N N
63.96%
73.46%
INITIAL 5001 999901 002 Middle SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
VIKINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL N N
17.03%
42.41%
INITIAL 5002 999901 004Elementary School
EXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
TIMBERWOLVES ELEMENTARY Y N
9.54%
32.58% Priority
INITIAL 5003 999901 006Elementary School
EXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
WILD ELEMENTARY N N
57.63%
67.28%
Was the school given a designation?
education.state.mn.us
• MMR used to assign Title I schools to two categories:
127 Reward Schools (15 percent of Title I Schools) 42 Priority Schools (5 percent of Title I schools)
• FR used to assign schools to one category: 85 Focus Schools (10 percent of Title I Schools)
19
Recognition, Accountability and Support
education.state.mn.us
• Annual reporting of more data than ever before• Continued reporting of AYP• Two additional categories of Title I schools
based on MMR starting in August:– Celebration Schools (“Next 10 percent”)– Continuous Improvement Schools (Bottom
25 percent)
20
What about the “other 70 percent”?
Title I Schools Rank Ordered 5 Groups Identified
1- Reward Schools
Top 15 % Identified
2- Priority Schools
Bottom 5% Identified
3- Focus Schools
Middle 10% with Extreme Achievement
Gaps
4- Continuous Improvement
Bottom 25% Identified
5- Celebration Schools
Next 25% Below Reward
May Apply
10% of Applicants Selected
Exit Criteria
• Priority Schools: Two consecutive years out of the bottom 25 percent on the MMR (‘13 & ‘14).
• Focus Schools: Two consecutive years out of the bottom 25 percent on the FR (‘13 & ‘14).
• SIG Schools: Opportunity to exit at end of grant (‘13) if out of bottom 25 percent on MMR that year. Several current SIG schools above cuts.
• Priority or Focus: Immediate exit if a Reward School after any year starting in ‘13.
Current 25th Percentiles and Reward Schools
• Elementary Schools: MMR 33.81%; FR 42.55%; Lowest Reward MMR 73.30%
• Middle Schools: MMR 18.68%; FR 42.96%; Lowest Reward MMR 79.05%
• High Schools: MMR 22.05%; FR 31.99%; Lowest Reward MMR 76.15%
• Numbers will be different every year. This is just an example.
MMR 25th %ile FR 25 %ile Reward School CutElementary 33.81% 42.55% 73.30%
Middle/Jr. High 18.68% 42.96% 79.05%
High School 22.05% 31.99% 76.15%
Current Exit Points
MMR and Designation Release Timeline
• MDE must run the MMR and designate the first round of Priority, Focus and Reward schools before the end of the school year.
• The first MMR and designations will be based off of data from 2010 and 2011.
• There will be no Celebration or Continuous Improvement Schools this year.
• Data from current year testing will be used in MMR released late this summer.
More Information and Help
• Visit http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/Welcome/AdvBCT/NCLBWaiver/index.html for FAQ, Glossary, Summaries, etc.
• Email [email protected] with questions.