Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018...

78
Metropolitan Transit Commission January 23, 2019

Transcript of Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018...

Page 1: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission

January 23, 2019

Page 2: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan
Page 3: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission January 23, 2019 Agenda

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION Wednesday, January 23, 2019

5:30pm Charlotte Mecklenburg Government Center

Room 267 AGENDA

I. Call to Order ...................................................................................................... Mayor Vi Lyles

II. Action Items

• Selection of MTC Vice Chairman .......................................................................... MTC

III. Approval of the November 28, 2018 Summary (p.3-10) ................................... Vice Chairman

IV. Report from the Chair of the Transit Service Advisory Committee (TSAC) .... Sam Grundman

V. Report from the Chair of the Citizens Transit Advisory Group (CTAG) ......... Edward Tillman

VI. Public Comments

VII. Information Items • LYNX System Update: Staff Recommendations (p.11-15) ................. Jason Lawrence • FY2020 Budget & FY2020-24 CIP Overview (p.16-67) John Lewis/Blanche Sherman • FY2019 Operating & CIP Budget Amendment (p.68-69) ................. Blanche Sherman

VIII. Chief Executive Officer’s Report ........................................................................ John Lewis, Jr

IX. Other Business .................................................................................................... Vice Chairman

X. Adjourn

Page 4: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan
Page 5: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 1 of 8

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION

MEETING SUMMARY

November 28, 2018

Presiding: Ella Scarborough (Chair, Mecklenburg County Commission)

Present: Mayor Vi Lyles, (City of Charlotte) Danny Pleasant (Charlotte Assistant City Manager) Bill Thunberg (Mooresville Representative) Mayor Walker Reid (Gastonia)

Larry Faison (City Manager, Monroe) William Coxe (Town Planner, Huntersville) Mayor Paul Bailey (Matthews) Andrew Grant (Cornelius Town Manager)

Deputy Director: John Muth

I. Call to OrderThe regular meeting of the Metropolitan Transit Commission was called to order at 5:00 p.m. byMTC’s Chairman, Commissioner Scarborough.

II. Review of Meeting SummaryThe meeting summary of October 24, 2018 was approved as written.

III. Transit Services Advisory Committee (TSAC) Chair’s ReportChris Maloy - Chairman reported that the Transportation Services Advisory Committee met on

Thursday, November 8th and had 1 action item and 2 information items.

1) The action item that we received, was to review and approve the February service changeand TSAC did approve that motion with Ms. Pamela White presenting.

2) The first information item we received an update Mr. John Lewis on the transit outage aswell as some other activities that are going on within the CATS system and laid out some ofthe goals.

3) The second information item we received an update from Olaf Kinard on technologyincluding the CATS apps. The real-time app as well as Uber and the Lyft application.

Also, Mr. Maloy shared that this would be his last meeting as TSAC chair. In December, TSAC will be electing a new chair for the following year. He has been honored to provide MTC updates and serve as chair. The MTC Thanked Mr. Malory for his service as the chairman.

IV. Citizens Transit Advisory Group (CTAG) Chair’s ReportCo-Chairman Edward Tillman gave the CTAG’s Report. CTAG received several updates at the

November 20nd, meeting. 1) First update was the state and federal legislative agendas.2) Second update was the Envision My Ride initiative, and the long-term goal of this initiative is

to get the average ride time down to 30 minutes to any of our designated job centers. Rightnow, that time is currently anywhere from 60 minutes to 90 minutes in some cases, butthey're moving toward getting that much tighter. There has been a success with some of

3

Page 6: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 2 of 8

that. There was also a discussion about using the last mile project and trying to coordinate that with the Envision My Ride, but there hasn't been, I would say, a significant usage of the last mile project in which we utilized Lyft and other services to get people to that spot. So that might not be something that moves forward.

3) Third update was on Hurricane Michael and Florence and the delays regarding that; eight-day delay overall. Bus services never stopped. One of the items that came out of that was arealization that better communication to our clients is a very necessary aspect, and sothere's now been a usage of SPOKEN-Hub, which is another social media application thatwill allow more direct communication to clients of our system and specifically giving theminformation about CATS, not having to go through filters of Facebook which gets a little lostin the messaging.

4) Last update was on the Ride CATS app. A company is in place to do the updates, but there'sbeen a bit of a slow-down because of the hacking issues from earlier this year. It's beenfunded and decisions are ready to move forward, but just having some difficulty with thesecurity issues.

V. Public Comments. Ms. Meg Fencil - Program Director at Sustain Charlotte shared a statement ofsupport where Sustain Charlotte gathered over 2,400 signatures from area residents. About 900of these are online and the rest collected at various events, neighborhood association meetings,and outreach events. This is a broad statement of support addressed really to Charlotte CityCouncil and Mecklenburg County Commissioners. I wanted to share it with you all tonightbecause the MTC plays such a pivotal role in supporting transit.

And I specifically wanted to draw your attention to the public support for the Envision My Rideinitiative and completion of the projects in the 2030 transit plan. I encourage you let us know ifthere's anything else that Sustain Charlotte can do to help to support transit.

Mayor Bailey ask if it would be worthwhile to talk with the six small towns to have them jointhe support of Sustain Charlotte. It would and Sustain Charlotte will reach out to them.

VI. Action Items.a. 2019-2020 State & Federal Legislative Agendas Dana Fenton

Resolution: Mayor Paul Bailey (Matthews) motioned to approve the 2019-2020 State &Federal Legislative Agendas; William Coxe (Huntersville) seconded the motion, which passedunanimously.

b. 1) Travel Markets Policy Larry Kopf Larry Kopf, Chief Operations Planning Officer presented two policies up for review. These are MTC policies that help to direct staff. First one is the travel markets policy which determines which markets CATS will compete for business in. These are policies that are established by MTC and they provide guidance to staff in terms of how we develop our service, and the other policies and the transit service guidelines policy which gets into issue such as load standard, stop spacing, and where amenities are placed, and just a summary of the changes. This is an action item. We're looking for, either feedback or approval of these items. Discussion: WILLIAM COXE (Huntersville): Madam Chair, first, let me apologize to the group for not being able to attend the last several meetings. Personal matters kept me away. Larry Kopf and have I been collaborating on it a little bit today. Here is the issue that I want to raise. The changes on the surface of the documents, the change to 2025 transit land use

4

Page 7: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 3 of 8

plan to the 2030 transit corridor services plan seem to be reasonable because that's sort of the update of the 2025 plan. The issue is that the 2030 transit corridor services plan does not say that as a goal for what we all do together in this arena doesn't say that as a goal of that we're trying to achieve a land use vision for the region. What it says in the 2030 plan is these are what we want to do in each corridor. It doesn't say why. The 2025 plan approved in 1998 does, in fact, say that this is our regional vision for growth, the five regular transit corridors, the rapid transit corridors, in particular, are what will help us achieve that. And I think that is an important aspect of what we do collectively in that we're trying to achieve something with this investment, not only with this, but our roads and parks and schools and so forth. I have suggested or I would like to suggest a couple of modifications to the policies that you have in front of you to try to bring back in that focus on land goals, land development goals as part of these documents so that as future groups have to deal with -- I hope we don't have to deal with production of service again, we may, I don't know. But as we deal with decisions on the services that are provided by CATS, we have that land use element as one of the foundational goals. So, with that prelude, Larry simply went back in and suggested, and I absolutely concur, that in the travel markets policy where we had stricken the reference to the 2025 integrated -- 2025 transit land use plan that we simply reinsert 2025 transit land use plan as amended and updated by the 2030 transit corridor system plan. So simply that change of events. Then when we get down into primary markets, there may be a better way, a more succinct way of phrasing this, but the suggested language that I'm going to suggest, these markets must be well-served to achieve the goals of the centers, corridors, and wedges growth framework as adopted by the city of Charlotte because that document is now a city of Charlotte document. And the goals of the individual town growth plans. These markets must also be well-served to achieve the goals of the 2025 land use plan as amended and updated by 2030. So simply again to bring back in the land use elements to that. MAYOR LYLES (City of Charlotte): I'm not sure that I understood under the primary markets of CATS solicited priority order. I don't have the wording and I'm trying to figure out what you said. It sounded fair, but would it be appropriate to kind of say the primary markets for CATS listed in priority are below or are -- is it somewhere to -- is it number 7 or is it a statement after number 6? MR. COXE: The document as it exists today starts off under primary markets saying these markets must be well-served to achieve these goals. And all I did was simply take those documents wherein those goals are supposed to be embedded and change the wording to call out on the documents. MAYOR LYLES: So in these it will say these markets must be well-served to achieve the goals of the adopted. MR. COXE: Of the centers, corridors, and wedges growth forecast as adopted by the City of Charlotte and the goals of the individual town growth plans, which brings the towns back into the picture. These markets must also be well-served to achieve the goals of the 2025 transit land use plan as amended and updated by the 2030 transit corridor services plan. MAYOR LYLES: I think the sense of what you're saying is incorporated and so it's not the subject. I'm just trying to figure out where it is and I guess the thing that I would say is everyone is in agreement on the staff that this is appropriate? JOHN MUTH (CATS): Yes, at staff level, Bill and Larry talked to them today. We also talked to them. We're comfortable with Bill's recommendations.

5

Page 8: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8

MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan is a document that was adopted by the City of Charlotte but not adopted by the towns. We wanted to incorporate the towns also by talking about, you know, making a reference to the town growth plans. And that it was to pull the towns into as well. It's just a reference. It doesn't change the point of this policy. It's just a reference that's in the policy.

Resolution: Mayor Vi Lyles (City of Charlotte) motioned to approve the Travel Markets, as updated by the previous discussion; William Coxe (Huntersville) seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.

b. 2) Transit Services Guidelines Policy Larry Kopf Larry Kopf, Chief Operations Planning Officer presented second policy up for approval – The Transit Service Guideline Policy. Discussion: WILLIAM COXE (Huntersville): Under the transit services guidelines there is, again, a call out to the transit market guidelines. And the proposed language under 2.1 simply changes where Larry had originally proposed the 2030 transit corridor system to say the 2025 transit land use plan as amended and updated by the 2030. BILL THUNBERG (Mooresville Representative): There's some changes in here particularly that articulate like the amenities, etc. I'm just pointing this out as a matter of procedure. If since these changes have occurred and there frequently are questions about what CATS policy is with regards to providing amenities, I would encourage you that the staff send this out to a local jurisdiction and highlight those areas so that if they need to amend their land use plans or ordinances or whatever to reference this document or any portion of the document, that they're aware that that -- those changes have been made.

Resolution: Mayor Vi Lyles (City of Charlotte) motioned to approve the Transit Services Guideline Policy, as updated by the previous discussion; William Coxe (Huntersville) seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.

c. North Mecklenburg Express Services Larry Kopf Larry Kopf, Chief Operations Planning Officer seeking approval of the propose changes to the North Mecklenburg Express Service. Whenever making a change that affects over 25% of a bus route, it does take MTC approval to make that change. We are planning to update the bus routes to take advantage of the express lanes that will be completed next year on I-77. Public input has been included in creating the changes. Also, worked with the towns tocome up with these changes. The first is to change 53X North Meck Express to takeadvantage of the direct connect on Lakeview and to express lanes into uptown.

In the morning the bus would get off at Hamright and then go up through the office park to the park and ride lot at Huntersville Gateway and then pick up people in Huntersville and come straight back on the highway. It would be the reverse in the afternoon.

Now, we will implement this incrementally as this project proceeds and as things open, trying to have a moving target in terms of when things are going to be open. We will implement this. This is the ultimate plan when everything is opened.

The next is to change the service that comes from Davidson and have that service go to the Cornelius park and ride lots and will provide a quicker trip for people in Davidson and from the Cornelius park and ride lot. Then offer direct service that covers Northcross park and ride lot with reverse service on Statesville.

6

Page 9: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 5 of 8

We will change the uptown route to take advantage of the direct connect on the Brookshire Freeway, which will be a direct connect from the express lanes into the Brookshire Freeway and then we'll use Church and College to operate in uptown.

We hope to get this started in the first quarter of next year. We're working with the construction companies on when things are going to open. And it's up for your approval tonight.

Comments: WILLIAM COXE (Huntersville): This is actually very exciting, Madam Chair, we are going to now have this corridor truly begin to fulfill the vision that was created quite some time ago. It's good. CHRIS MALOY (Chairman – TSAC): As a daily rider of this service, I am excited as well. I echo those comments.

The second thing I have, as we are moving, and this is more of a procedural thing as well. As we implement this, as we talked about, communication is critical if we're going to be hitting a moving targeted and we're not doing this with regular service change on a specific date, e-mail alerts, the on the bus fliers, something on every seat. That information is critical especially for those riders to make sure they're getting the right bus at the right time.

Resolution: Mayor Vi Lyles (City of Charlotte) motioned to approve the changes to the North Mecklenburg Express Services; Mayor Paul Bailey (Matthews) seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.

d. Cancellation of December 2018 MTC Meeting John Muth Resolution: Mayor Vi Lyles (City of Charlotte) motioned to cancel the December 2018 MTC Meeting; Mayor Paul Bailey (Matthews) seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.

VII. Information Itemsa. Regional Transit Plan Update Michelle Nance

Michelle NANCE of CCOG presented the following update on the Regional Transit Plan. I justwanted to provide a quick update on what we've been up to with this process since thetransit summer especially. And just as a reminder, the regional transit initiative is acooperative effort between the MTC and centralized -- it's a continuation to connect ourfuture dialogue about transit. And over the past year these are the kind of the key thingsthat have really emerged from our engagement. And it's about, you know, the population isgrowing. We need to have additional options for transportation, especially transit. Weknow that economic opportunity is a major issue, and in order to be competitive bothregionally, nationally, and globally, transit is an increasingly important piece of that puzzle.There were many things that the engagement suggested that we start working on. Butperhaps the most exciting thing is an update on the regional transit plan.

And just a reminder, the regional transit plan is really looking at how CATS servicesand other transit service providers within the region can better coordinate, especially acrosscounty lines. We're looking at long-term initiatives such as you heard loud and clear fromsome of the counties that they want an extension of the light rail. But we know that that'sabout preserving right-of-way. We know it's about land uses well ahead of getting the --getting any type of transit there. We're going to submit that we have to be right. Folks haveto be preparing for it ahead of time.

7

Page 10: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 6 of 8

But the transit plan is also about very near term initiatives and we heard loud and clear from the human services side of transit that there needs to be a better coordinated system for getting people across county lines. A lot of times folks are trying to get into Mecklenburg County for medical services. They're trying to get here for educational opportunities. And the need for that human services transit and kind of day to day is there.

We also want to make sure that we integrate with local transit plans. We know in order to get down on the ground and effect those land uses, whatever comes out of the transit plan really needs to go into local plans, MPO, transportation long range plans, and into land use plans at the local level.

So many of you were at the transit summit in May. And the purpose of that was really to reiterate all that we had learned up to that date. And we had elected officials from across the region that talked about why regional transit was important to them. We had folks from the business community that were there, over 80 agencies, 12 counties, 2 states were represented. At the end of the day a call to action for doing the regional transit plan.

Since that time, we formed a trans advisory committee. It's kind of a small group, but it represents the region, mostly technical folks, to really help us guide the -- putting together a scope for the regional transit plan. And you can see they're from across the region, transit providers from Gastonia Rider Transit and Kannapolis in Cabarrus County and others.

In addition to that advisory committee, we've had a lot more engagement. The star is basically where we are today. Lots of engagement occurred early in 2017 where we were just asking what are the opportunities and what are your needs. That rolled into the transit summit. In October we were out to each county and at those meetings there were managers from cities and counties and elected officials from local governments. We also had staffers from federal government and staffers from state and Congressional delegates as well. And, really, the focus there was what do we need in this transit plan scope to meet the needs of our county. What do we need to have in there to make sure their needs are addressed?

In November we went out and we had 15 forums. And those were state corridor committees. There were groups that represented the economy, that represented opportunity, and then other groups that represented community development. Just to give you a sampling of was at those meetings, it was hospitals, it was major employers, it was bike and pedestrian advocates. It was work force development people, people that work at community colleges.

So, really, this was an opportunity for us to have some smaller meetings, but to really get down a little bit deeper into what were the transit needs for those particular stakeholders. At those meetings we heard a lot about messaging. What transit messaging would work, and heard a lot of really great stories that we would be able to roll into the transit planning effort.

January 2019 we're going to be out to the rural counties. This was specifically requested by the North Carolina Department of Transportation. They wanted to make sure that the rural counties in the region were involved and at least understood what was going on to see how they could be part of the process. And the idea is that in 2019 we would go forward with a request for proposals with a scope out for consultant review and then start the plan in 2019 into 2020. This is just a representation of what those meetings liked like that I was just talking about, the October meetings, November meetings, and those that will happen early 2019.

What's next? rural scope development meetings. We'll have a draft of that actually in December. We will be vetting with CATS staff, going out for the RFP. And there is a

8

Page 11: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 7 of 8

whole kind of another layer of activities that's going on there, and that's really searching for funding for the regional transit plan. And we're getting federal agencies, state agencies, and locals for that. It's really looking at all three of those.

You may ask why do all this engagement before the plan. The answer -- we have found out so much that we've kind of dug through the weeds. We're going to be handing a consultant a lot of great information. We feel like they can come out, pretty quickly, and tell us where some potential light rail corridors could be. They could talk to us about the coordination. We would hear a lot of express bus services, the need for van pools. Every county we've been in, they've raised their hands, they've been very excited about that opportunity. We think that that's going to save time and money frankly, but from the consultant side to be able to have that information ready.

VIII. Chief Executive Officer’s Report John Muth Under the CEO’s report, Mr. Muth discussed the following:

a. Sales Tax Report:

CATS’ Deputy Director Muth: The August 2018 receipts were about 14 percent above the August receipts from last year and that the receipts in August were also about 24 percent above our budgetary for the month. We're projecting these will hopefully come in at 7-1/2 percent above what we budgeted for this year, around 105 million. For now, the sales tax are still continuing to grow at a good rate.

b. Ridership ReportCATS’ Deputy Director John Muth, reported the following: LYNX Blue Line -- the

average daily weekday ridership was 19,900. Remember that we had 11 days of service outage on the Blue Line for the month of October. That's why the numbers of 19,964. In July the Blue Line averaged 24,700; August, it was a little over 27,000; in September 26,200. We would expect November and December to rebound back to those type of numbers above 19,964. If you looked at that number later and had any questions about it, that's what we attribute that to.

IX. Other Business.a. Charlotte Gateway Station Dirt Contamination:Mayor Paul Bailey (Matthews) asked about the material dirt over at the new station, therewas some contamination in that dirt?JOHN MUTH (CATS): That's the Charlotte Gateway Station project. That site, we're workingclosely with the state, and the state has issued contracts for construction. Construction isunderway. Over the course of time we've known that there is contamination over in thatarea and there have been phase one and phase two assessments and there have been Ithink some wells that hadn't been drilled over there to monitor.

The standard course of doing the project, there was a report put together by Hart Hickman for the state as part of the project. They're over there monitoring all the excavation that occurs. We knew about it, we're treating the material appropriately, and removing it from the site as we excavate.

b. Thank You Outgoing Chairman:

9

Page 12: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 8 of 8

MAYOR Vi LYLES (City of Charlotte) shared to this with MTC. I know that this is your last meeting as chair since the December meeting is canceled. I am not looking forward to taking on this role, but I am looking tonight to say thank you for the work that you've done this past year and all that you've put into it. We all know what it takes – everyone in this room knows what it takes to chair anything. And so I want to say thank you and our greatest appreciation to you, Ms. Scarborough. Chairman Ella SCARBOROUGH (Board of Commissions): Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

X. AdjournThe meeting was adjourned at 5:43 p.m. by Commissioner Scarborough.

NEXT MTC MEETING: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2019, 5:30 P.M.

10

Page 13: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan
Page 14: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION INFORMATION ITEM STAFF SUMMARY

SUBJECT: LYNX System Update: Staff Recommendations DATE: January 23, 2019

1.0 PURPOSE/SCOPE: CATS is conducting transit studies for the LYNX Red Line/North Corridor and LYNX West Corridor. This effort will also include a system integration study for all CATS services existing and planned in Uptown Charlotte. The primary purpose of the study is to provide the necessary land use and transportation technical analysis including stakeholder and public outreach to support the selection by the MTC of updated Locally Preferred Alternatives (LPA).

Completion of this effort will achieve the following

• Staff recommendation for West Corridor rapid transit mode and alignment.• Updated plans for the LYNX Red Line as well as additional proposed North

Corridor rapid transit options.• Update on how the corridors will integrate with the existing LYNX Blue Line,

CityLYNX Gold Line, and Bus services, including the future Charlotte GatewayStation and LYNX Silver Line

• Identify future corridor transit needs through public input.

2.0 BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: Since July 2017, the CATS project team has engaged the public and stakeholders on rapid transit options for the North and West Corridors as well as system integration options (Attachment A, B and C). Between public workshops, stakeholder meetings, civic organizations and informal coffee chats, CATS have engaged well over 2,200 people. Through digital engagement platforms such as MetroQuest and Facebook over 3,200 survey responses were received and 2,800 people streamed our public workshops live.

The LYNX System Update project team will present to the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) staff recommendations for the West Corridor and System Integration as well a path forward for the North Corridor options at the January 23rd, 2019 MTC Meeting. Additionally, based on public input received, there are a number of recommendations to expand and improve transit service throughout CATS service area.

3.0 PROCUREMENT BACKGROUND: N/A

4.0 POLICY IMPACT: N/A

5.0 ECONOMIC IMPACT: N/A

6.0 ALTERNATIVES: N/A

7.0 RECOMMENDATION: This item is presented as information in preparation for action at the February 27, 2018 MTC meeting

11

Page 15: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

8.0 ATTACHMENT(S): (A) North Corridor Rapid Transit Options(B) West Corridor Rapid Transit Options(C) Center City System Integration Options

SUBMITTED AND RECOMMENDED BY:

__________________________________________ John M. Lewis, Jr. Chief Executive Officer, Charlotte Area Transit System Director of Public Transit, City of Charlotte

12

Page 16: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Attachment A North Corridor Rapid Transit Options

13

Page 17: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Attachment B West Corridor Rapid Transit Options

14

Page 18: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Attachment C Center City System Integration

15

Page 19: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan
Page 20: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION INFORMATION ITEM STAFF SUMMARY

SUBJECT: CEO Recommended DATE: January 23, 2019 FY2020 Preliminary Operating and Debt Service Budget FY2020-2024 Community Investment Plan

1.0 PURPOSE/SCOPE: This item advises that the Chief Executive Officer will present CATS’ FY2020 Preliminary Operating and Debt Service Budgets, and the FY2020-2024 Community Investment Plan (CIP) to the Metropolitan Transit Commission on January 23, 2019.

2.0 BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: The CATS FY2020 Preliminary Operating and Debt Service Budgets and the FY2020-2024 Community Investment Plan (CIP) will be presented in compliance with the Transit Governance Interlocal Agreement. The balanced budgets were developed in compliance with CATS’ Financial Policy guidelines and objectives.

The FY2020 Preliminary Operating and Debt Service Budgets maintain and enhance current services and commitments, with a focus on providing flexible mobility options. The FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget highlights include the Blue Line Extension (BLE), North Corridor Direct Connect Studies, and the Mobile Payment Application.

The FY2020-2024 Community Investment Plan (CIP) advances the 2030 Transit Corridor System Plan while providing enhanced mobility options. Key capital expenses include State of Good Repair, City Federated Video Monitoring System (VMS) Project, and Technology upgrades.

3.0 PROCUREMENT BACKGROUND: N/A

4.0 POLICY IMPACT: The recommended FY2020 Preliminary Operating and Debt Service Budget and FY2020-2024 Community Investment Plan (CIP) were developed in compliance with the following MTC Policy directives:

1) CATS Mission, Vision and Strategic Goals2) CATS Financial Policies (Rev. 2016)3) The 2030 Transit Corridor System Plan4) CATS Service and Fare Policies

5.0 ECONOMIC IMPACT: N/A

6.0 ALTERNATIVES: N/A

7.0 RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable at this time since information is being presented for review by the MTC.

8.0 ATTACHMENT(S): None

SUBMITTED AND RECOMMENDED BY:

__________________________________________ John M. Lewis, Jr. Chief Executive Officer, Charlotte Area Transit System Director of Public Transit, City of Charlotte

16

Page 21: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

FY2020 PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET

FY2020 – FY2024 PRELIMINARY CIP

17

Page 22: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

January 23, 2019

To: The Chair and Members of the Metropolitan Transit Commission

Charlotte, North Carolina

I am pleased to present to you the recommended FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget, which

includes the Operating and Debt Service Budgets, Financial and Business Performance Targets, and the

FY2020-FY2024 Community Investment Plan (CIP) for the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS). The

balanced budget maintains and enhances current services and commitments, with a focus on providing

flexible mobility options.

FY2020 Priorities:

The FY2020 budgets reflect priorities in the Metropolitan Transit Commission’s approved Mission and

Strategic Goals for CATS.

• Outstanding community-wide public transportation services

• Focused regional growth

• Safety and accountability

• Safe, affordable mobility options to jobs, education and housing

• Contribution to economic development in the County and region

• Investment in employees

FY2020 Budget Highlights:

• The Blue Line Extension (BLE) - after a full-year of revenue service of the 9.3 miles from Center

City Charlotte through the North Davidson historic arts district and University City area to a

terminus on the campus of the University of North Carolina, Charlotte (UNCC), requires additional

operating assistance to properly maintain the system. The system includes 11 new light rail

stations, with approximately 3,100 parking spaces at four stations with parking facilities. The

FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget includes approximately $1.3 million to cover additional

expenses for staffing and technology equipment contract maintenance fees related to the BLE.

• North Corridor Direct Connect Studies is an Advanced Transit System Plan pertaining to the

North Corridor. This is the next step from the system plan update that defined rail fixed

guideway alignments to serve the airport and the north corridor areas to determine the

appropriate transit mode for each of these corridors.

• Mobile Payment Application full implementation now gives transit riders an electronic payment

option to purchase transit fare on their phones, and maintain cash balances on individual

customer accounts for future use.

• State of Good Repair priorities including replacement of fixed-route buses, Special

Transportation Services (STS) buses and Vanpool vehicles; repairs and renovations to transit

facilities; and on-going light rail vehicle overhaul program.

FY2020 Preliminary Budget CEO’s Transmittal Letter | 1

Chief Executive Officer’s Transmittal Letter

18

Page 23: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

FY2020 Budget Highlights (continued):

• City Federated Video Monitoring System (VMS) Project will focus around Genetec Technology.

CATS will be replacing its current system to integrate with the City’s VMS. This solution will reduce

the number of recorders and increase system capability to share video with City Departments.

• Technology Upgrades to enhance delivery of transit services and customer traveling experience,

including replacement of mobile gateway modems on bus and rail for compatibility with City

services.

CATS FY2020 budget is supported primarily by the transit sales tax, fare revenues, service

reimbursements, maintenance of effort, operating and capital assistance from the Federal and State

governments and other miscellaneous sources.

CATS continues to deliver innovative projects that will improve the transit landscape for our region’s

residents, and to respond to the transit needs of the community within its available resources. In order

to advance the 2030 Transit Corridor System Plan, significant new funding sources are required. CATS

continues to work with state and regional stakeholders to raise awareness of our infrastructure needs

and advocate for a new, sustainable source of funding.

Respectfully submitted,

John M. Lewis, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

CEO’s Transmittal Letter | 2FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Chief Executive Officer’s Transmittal Letter

19

Page 24: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Table of Contents | 3FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 4

Section I – Operating Budget 5

Section II – Debt Service Budget 11

Section III - Revenue Reserve Fund 11

Section IV – Community Investment Plan 12

Section V – Performance Objectives 15

Section VI – CATS Services & Ridership 16

Section VII – CATS Program Profiles 17

Appendix 1 – Operating Budget Summary 18

Appendix 2 – Performance Objectives 19

Appendix 3 – Staffing Summary 20

Appendix 4 – Operating Budget 21

Appendix 5 – Debt Service Summary 23

Appendix 6 – Community Investment Plan 26

Appendix 7 – Grant-Funded Operating Projects 30

Appendix 8 – Other Capital Projects Managed by CATS 31

Appendix 9 – FY2020 Budget Schedule 33

20

Page 25: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

FY2019 was the first full-year of revenue service for the Blue Line Extension (BLE). Riders can now

travel on 18.9 miles of light rail from UNCC in the Northeast Corridor, through Center City Charlotte

and onwards to the I-485 South Corridor for access to jobs, education, sports and other events. Trains

operate seven days a week from 5:26 am – 1:26 am daily, arriving at stations every 7.5 minutes

during rush hour and every 15 minutes at other times during the week. Weekend service operates

every 20 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes during late night hours.

CATS has effectively controlled operating costs in FY2019 and continues to maintain expense controls

through FY2020. Fuel costs remain low due to the hedging program, providing locked pricing and

budget stability. Sales tax growth and increased interest earnings are expected to continue into

FY2020.

Executive Summary | 4FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Executive Summary

BUDGET SUMMARY

FY2019 FY2020

Adopted Budget

(millions)

Preliminary Budget

(millions)

Operating Revenues 152.6$ 162.4$

CATS Control Account 2.0 -

Total Operating Revenue 154.6$ 162.4$

Operating Expenditures 154.4$ 162.4$

Transfer to Capital 0.2 -

Total Operating Expenditures and Transfers 154.6$ 162.4$

Debt Service Budget 125.9$ 115.3$

Capital Budget 319.4$ 24.5$

21

Page 26: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section I. Operating Budget | 5

I. OPERATING BUDGET

The FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget is $162.4 million.

Reference: Appendix 1

The FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget covers cost for transit provided by City and contracted

employees. Approximately 63.8% (or $103.7 million) of the Operating Budget includes Personal

Services with the remaining 36.2% covering other operating expenses (or $58.8 million).

Direct services account for 88.9% (or $144.4 million) of the Operating Budget. Support services and

other indirect services account for 11.1% (or $18.0 million) of the Operating Budget.

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

BUDGET SUMMARY

FY2019 FY2020 Variance Variance

Adopted Budget

(millions)

Preliminary Budget

(millions)(millions) (%)

Operating Revenues 152.6$ 162.4$ 9.8$ 6.4%

CATS Control Account 2.0 - (2.0)$ -100.0%

Total Operating Revenue 154.6$ 162.4$ 7.8$ 5.0%

Operating Expenditures

Current Service Levels 153.9$ 161.6$ 7.7$ 5.0%

Service Level Changes 0.5 0.8$ 0.3$ 64.9%

Subtotal Operating Expenditures 154.4$ 162.4$ 8.0$ 5.2%

Transfer to Capital 0.2 - (0.2) -100.0%

Total Operating Expenditures and Transfers 154.6$ 162.4$ 7.8$ 5.0%

22

Page 27: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section I. Operating Budget | 6

A. Operating Revenues: $162.4 million

In FY2020, operating revenues are projected at $162.4 million, an increase of $7.8 compared to the

FY2019 Adopted Budget, which represents an increase of 5.0%. The increase is primarily due to an

increase in the operating allocation that reflects an updated sales tax trendline, and an accounting re-

classification of grant-funded operating activities. Prior to FY2019, grant-funded operating revenues

were accounted for in the capital budget. For FY2020, these grant-funded operating revenues

continue to be accounted for in the operating budget, causing an increase in the operating revenues.

Operating revenues consists of system-generated revenue such as passenger fares, advertising and

leases, and also includes the State Maintenance Assistance Program (SMAP) and Maintenance of Effort

funding from the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County and the Town of Huntersville. The majority of

operating revenues come from sales tax revenue, which is projected to continue growing steadily.

The following chart identifies the sources of the $162.4 million in revenue that will fund the FY2020

operating programs.

Fares & Svc Reimb.

$29.9 18%

Sales Tax Allocation$75.5 47%

Maint. Of Effort$22.6

14%

Operating Assist.$7.5

5%

Non Operating $23.1 14%

Other Misc.$3.7

2%

FY2020: Where the Money Comes From

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

23

Page 28: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Budget Summary

Key changes in revenue in the FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget versus the FY2019 Adopted

Operating Budget are as follows:

Section I. Operating Budget | 7FY2020 Preliminary Budget

FY2019 FY2020 Variance Variance

Adopted Budget

(millions)

Preliminary

Operating Budget

(millions)(millions ) (%)

Operating Allocation 69.3$ 75.5$ 6.3$ 9.1%

Operating Allocation increase reflects an

updated sales tax trendline provided by the City

Treasurer’s Office

Fare Revenues and Service Reimbursements 33.1$ 29.9$ (3.2)$ -9.6%

The decrease is primarily due to updated fare

revenue projections for BLE light rail opening

year services, elimination or reduction of some

services to include the UNCC Shuttle and the

Airport Connector bus services.

Maintenance of Effort 22.0$ 22.6$ 0.7$ 3.0%

Maintenance of Effort are funds received from

the City of Charlotte, which are paid to CATS in

compliance with state law. The City of Charlotte

increases its annual contribution by 3%.

Operating Assistance 6.1$ 7.5$ 1.4$ 23.7%

Operating Assistance includes funds from the

City of Charlotte for Goldline Phase 1, and $6.03

million from the federal government for

implementation of the BLE light rail service. For

FY2020 there is no longer a reimbursement from

NCDOT and the private sector for construction

mitigation services on the I-77 Corridor.

Other (Miscellaneous) 3.2$ 3.7$ 0.5$ 14.5%

Other Miscellaneous revenues include

advertising, leasing, and interest earned.

CATS Control Account 2.00$ -$ (2.0)$ -100.0%

CATS does not plan to transfer revenue from the

Control Account in FY2020

Non-Operating Revenue 19.0$ 23.1$ 4.1$ 21.7%

Grant funding revenue received for operating

exenses, this includes the State Maintenance

Assistance Program (SMAP) and Operating

Assistance from Mecklenburg County and the

Town of Huntersville.

Total Operating Budgetary Increases (Decreases) 154.6$ 162.4$ 7.8$ 5.0%

Revenue Source

24

Page 29: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section I. Operating Budget | 8

B. Operating Expenditures: $162.4 million

In FY2020, operating expenses are projected at $162.4 million, an increase of $7.8 million compared

to the FY2019 Adopted Budget, or 5.0% increase. Part of this increase is due to additional BLE-

related expenses for staffing and technology equipment contract maintenance fees for equipment no

longer under warranty. It is also due to an accounting re-classification of grant-funded operating

activities such as corridor studies. Previously, grant-funded operating expenditures were accounted for

in the capital budget but starting in FY2019 these grant-funded operating expenditures are

accounted for in the operating budget, causing an increase in the operating expenditures.

C. Operating Balance: $0.0 million

The Operating Balance is transferred to the capital program and provides a portion of the ‘matching

fund’ dollars required by Federal and/or State grants as well as being programmed to fund capital

projects that do not receive grant funds. As the CATS control account continues to grow it provides an

opportunity to reduce the amount of operating funds used for capital. In FY2019 the department only

transferred $0.2 million from operating while using the control account to fund the remaining portion.

In FY2020 the department will utilize the CATS control account to fund all capital programs eliminating

any transfers from Operating to Capital.

Where the Money Goes in FY2020

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

PersonalServices$103.7

64% Fuel$7.7 5%

Other$51.1 31%

25

Page 30: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section I. Operating Budget | 9

Key changes in expenditures in the FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget versus the FY2019

Adopted Operating Budget are as follows:

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

FY2019 FY2020 Variance Variance

Adopted Budget

(millions)

Preliminary

Operating Budget

(millions)

(millions ) (%)

Personal Services 102.6$ 103.7$ 1.0$ 1.0%

- 3.0% increase in merit for City employees

- 5% increase in health insurance cost for City

employees

Fuel 7.1$ 7.4$ 0.2$ 3.0%

Diesel fuel for Bus & STS Operations is forward

purchased at approximately $2.03/gallon of the

FY2020 estimated usage.

Other Operating Expense 44.6$ 51.4$ 6.8$ 15.2%

Increased operating costs for Facilities, BOD

Maintenance, Maintenance of Way, Transit

Security, Administration, Development, Quality

Assurance and Technology.

Transfer to Capital 0.2$ -$ (0.2)$ -100.0%

Decrease in transfer from CATS operating to

capital projects

Total Operating Budgetary Increases (Decreases) 154.6$ 162.4$ 7.8$ 5.0%

Expenditure

26

Page 31: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section I. Operating Budget | 10

D. Service Level Changes

The FY2020 Preliminary Operating Budget includes service level changes totaling $0.8 million in

additional expenditures tied to an additional 17 City full-time equivalent (FTE) positions:

E. Staffing

The FY2020 Operating Budget provides for 551.75 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions, which includes

the Service Level Changes of 17.00 FTE. Additionally, the CATS FY2020 Preliminary Budget provides

for 3 ‘project term’ positions to be maintained through the closing date of the grants on each of the

capital investment projects. Of the 7.50 temporary positions, 3 are expected to be funded by NCDOT’s

annual intern program. A staffing summary by section can be found in Appendix 3.

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Section FTE Additional Budget

414030 - Technology Business Systems Spec. Lead 1.00 116,606$

416011 - Rail Administration Training Specialist 1.00 84,115

416012 - Rail Maintenance Transportation Elect. Technician II 10.00 386,010

416012 - Rail Maintenance Rail Car Maintenance Supervisor 2.00 104,519

416012 - Rail Maintenance Rail Maintenance Assistant 2.00 51,969

419010 - HR & CR Administrative Officer II 1.00 81,361

17.00 824,580$

Position

Total additional FTE & budget tied to SLCs

27

Page 32: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section II. Debt Service Budget | 11

II. DEBT SERVICE BUDGET

A. Debt Service Revenues: $115.3 million

No new debt financing is planned for FY2020. Key sources of revenue for payment of the current

debt expenses are the transit sales tax (local), Federal and State grants.

Debt financing proceeds are utilized to fund CATS capital investment projects.

B. Debt Service Expenditures: $115.3 million

Debt service expenditures include principal and interest costs on project financings, together with fees

and miscellaneous costs associated with capital financings.

In FY2020, debt service expenditures are as follows:

• $115.2 million is for principal and interest payments shown below

• $0.1 million covers miscellaneous fees

Reference: Appendix 5

III. REVENUE RESERVE FUND

In 2016, the MTC approved revision of CATS Financial Policies which created a CATS Control Account.

This account would receive sales tax revenue in excess of the sales tax trend line only when the

balance in the Revenue Reserve Fund has reached the maximum required balance of $30 million.

The Revenue Reserve Fund (RRF) reached the required balance of $30 million in FY2017. Therefore,

the projected FY2020 $11 million of sales tax dollars that would have been deposited into this fund

will transfer directly to the CATS Control Account. In accordance with Section 3.3 of MTC Financial

Policies MTC-01, the Transit CEO may recommend use of such funds, for operating or capital programs,

to the Metropolitan Transit Commission as a part of the CEO Recommended Budget in January of each

year.

Project/Description FY2020

Principal & Interest

(millions)

Source of Funding

South Corridor – Blue Line $ 4.2 Local

South Tryon Bus Garage 3.7 Federal & Local

Various Bus Facilities, Fleet & Other 2.3 Local

Northeast Corridor – Blue Line Extension 105.0 Federal, State & Local

Miscellaneous Fees 0.1 Local

TOTAL $ 115.3

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

28

Page 33: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section IV. Community Investment Plan | 12

IV. COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP)

CATS $95.0 million 5-year CIP is prioritized to continue the systems State of Good Repair by

replacing vehicles, repairing and renovating facilities and technology upgrades.

Notes:

1. Excludes Grant-Funded Operating Projects totaling $51.1 million for FY2020 – FY2024

2. Includes some prior year re-allocation but excludes carry over

Capital Revenues: $95.0 million

Revenues for CATS 5-year capital program includes funds from Federal and State grants, transit sales

tax and private funding.

The FY2020 to FY2024 CATS capital program consist of the following:

• $60.3 million from Federal grants including Federal New Starts, Formula Funding, Bus and Bus

Facilities and Enhanced Mobility.

• $6.5 million from State grants including Competitive funding for Advanced Technology and Urban

State Matching Funds for Vehicle purchases.

• $0.7 million prior year re-allocations

• $27.5 million from transit sales tax (transfer from the Operating Balance, CATS Control Account

and CATS Fund Balance), private funding and prior year savings re-allocated.

FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024

TOTAL

FY2020 –

FY2024

Revenues 24.5 17.1 17.7 17.7 17.8 95.0

Expenditures 24.5 17.1 17.7 17.7 17.8 95.0

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

29

Page 34: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section IV. Community Investment Plan | 13

Capital Expenditures: $95.0 million

CATS 5-year capital program key expenditures include the following:

Notes:

1. Excludes Grant-Funded Operating Projects totaling $51.1 million for FY2020 – FY2024

2. Includes some prior year re-allocation but excludes carry over

Capital Program/Project FY2020-FY2024 Total

State of Good Repair - Vehicle Replacements

Replacement of revenue service vehicles that have reached the end of their

useful life. In FY20 CATS will replace 10 Buses, 17 Special Transportation Vehicles,

16 Vanpool vehicles and 5 expansion vehicles for the Vanpool program.

$ 59.1 million

State of Good Repair - Facilities and Others

Replacement, upgrades or repair of transit assets including renovations/repairs of

transit facilities to comply with federal Transit Asset Management guidelines.$ 0.7 million

Transit Safety & Security

Programs and projects to advance safe, reliable, and equitable transit service

throughout the system including camera replacements and dispatch upgrades.$ 1.3 million

Transit Long Range Capital Improvement

Design services for rapid transit, rail, bus, streetcar and facility improvements to

better serve the region. Projects include Lynx Blue Line Extension and a new

South end Station.

$ 19.4 million

Non-Revenue Vehicles

Purchase and replacement of non revenue vehicles for supervisory staff,

maintenance and repair calls.$ 3.2 million

Transit New Equipment

The purchase of new equipment such as steam bay lifts, a track backhoe and

technology upgrades.$ 6.3 million

Other Programs

Other programs included in the five-year capital program include Enhanced

Mobility projects and technology upgrades.$ 4.3 million

Carry Over Projects 1

Continued funding for existing capital projects. $ 0.7 million

Total Five-Year Capital Program 2 $95.0 million

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

30

Page 35: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section IV. Community Investment Plan | 14

CAPITAL PROGRAMS MANAGED BY CATS

CATS manages two transit capital investment programs which receive funds from the Federal and State

governments and the City of Charlotte. Reference: Appendix 8

The Charlotte Gateway Station – Rail Project (Phase I)

The Charlotte Gateway Station (CGS) Project is a planned multi-modal transit center located in Center

City Charlotte.

The City of Charlotte and the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) are partners in

the phased implementation of this project which:

• Improves both regional (Amtrak) passenger rail service and regional freight rail operations through

the construction of track and bridge improvements

• Includes a future multi-modal passenger station facility, the completion of which will mark the return

of Amtrak service to Uptown Charlotte, with supporting modal connections to CityLYNX GoldLine,

regional bus connections and CATS local bus routes.

Design and engineering of the first phase of the Project is underway with construction of the initial

track and bridge improvements began in 2018. Phase 1 is being funded with federal, state and City

of Charlotte (local) funds.

The CityLYNX GoldLine Streetcar Project – Phase II

The CityLYNX GoldLine Streetcar project - Phase II is an extension of the approximately 1.5 mile

CityLYNX GoldLine Phase 1 project completed in July 2015. Phase II consists of the design and

construction of approximately 2.5 miles of double-track in-street running streetcar line. This will result

in approximately a total of a 4-mile long double-track streetcar system which will extend from

Johnson C. Smith University through Center City Charlotte, to Novant Health and Sunnyside Avenue.

The project is being funded by a Federal Small Starts Grant for $74,999,999 and with a local match

of $75 million funded by the City of Charlotte. Construction began in early 2017 and is scheduled to

be completed by August 2020.

Budget Summary

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

31

Page 36: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section V. Performance Objectives | 15

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

CATS Financial Policies provide guidelines on how financial resources shall be utilized to fulfill the

mission of the transit system, meet obligations and to protect the public interest.

BALANCED SCORECARD OBJECTIVES

CATS Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is developed on high level outcomes that determine the efficiency and

effectiveness of the transit system. These outcomes establish high level expectations for CATS and are

comparable to national standards for a medium to large transit agency. Outcomes are based on

performance metrics established for CATS operations and services. The BSC performance objectives

are referenced in Appendix 2

Performance Objectives

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

32

Page 37: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section VI. Services & Ridership | 16

CATS SERVICES AND RIDERSHIP

CATS will provide approximately 23.5 million rides in FY2020 on its bus, light rail, streetcar, vanpool

and Special Transportation services.

The Blue Line Extension finished it’s first full-year of revenue service in FY2019, providing service to

eleven new station locations from 9th Street in Uptown Charlotte to the UNC-Charlotte campus.

Ridership was lower than projected but is expected to increase in FY2020 as construction projects at

the Sugar Creek, 36th Street and UCB stations is completed. The light rail system captures a number of

riders who previously used the bus system, although not as many as included in initial projections.

Customers wholly new to transit are also expected to contribute to an increase in light rail ridership as

ridership matures over the first few years of operations.

The FY2020 budget proposes a net increase of approximately 6,383 in bus service hours. The Special

Transportation Service ridership is expected to continue to increase in FY2020. CATS is planning to

upgrade the existing paratransit scheduling system to help manage the increased ridership.

CATS Services and Ridership

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021

Bus 13,996,284 14,180,816 14,283,243 835,247 841,630 840,460

Light Rail 8,524,585 8,780,323 8,868,126 71,004 71,239 71,144

Streetcar 295,083 147,542 1,127,500 10,739 10,739 27,810

Special Transportation Svc. 267,083 267,083 267,083 153,048 153,048 153,048

Vanpool 135,149 135,149 135,149 33,731 33,731 33,731

Total 23,218,184 23,510,913 24,681,101 1,103,769 1,110,387 1,126,193

Ridership Revenue Service HoursMode

33

Page 38: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Section VII. CATS Program Profiles | 17

LIGHT RAIL / STREETCAR

Projected to provide over 71,000 hours and over 1.2 million miles of service to over 12 million passengers annually

DEVELOPMENT

Responsible for planning and construction of transit projects including quality control and assurance of all

project developments

SAFETY & SECURITY

Responsible for safety & security of all CATS amenities, facilities and individuals that come in

contact with CATS

CUSTOMER SERVICE, MARKETING & TECHNOLOGY

Manage public relations, customer service requests, trip planning assistance and technology for transit operations

HUMAN RESOURCE & CIVIL RIGHTS

Oversee compliance with federal, state & local guidelines to ensure fair and equal treatment of

customers and employees

BUS / STS / VANPOOL

Provides approximately 1 million hours and over 16 million miles of services to over 15 million passengers annually

FINANCE & PROCUREMENT

Manage all fiscal aspects and procurements for transit operations and capital projects including

budget, grants, debt financing, revenue collections & financial reporting

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Sets strategic direction for the department and manages the overall operation and administration, including

budgeting, training, coordinating with City Manager’s office and support of the Metropolitan Transit Commission

FACILITIES

Manage and maintain light rail stations, park & ride lots, parking decks, bus garages, light rail facilities, transit centers, and bus stops

The City provides additional support to CATS through a City Cost Allocation Plan.

CATS Program Profiles

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

34

Page 39: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Operating Fund

Sales Tax Allocation

FY2017 Actuals

FY2018 Actuals

FY2019 Adopted Budget

FY2019 Year-End

Projection

FY2020 Preliminary

Budget

Appendices | 18FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Appendix 1 – Operating Budget Summary

A Sales Tax Receipts 92,601,412$ 103,021,757$ 98,211,941$ 105,530,167$ 109,933,384$

B Less Sales Tax Trendline (78,272,224) (84,704,000) (87,499,000) (87,499,000) (93,147,033)

A - B = C Net Difference 14,329,188$ 18,317,757$ 10,712,941$ 18,031,167$ 16,786,351$

Sales Tax Available for Allocation:

D Transfer to (from) Revenue Reserve 14,329,188$ -$ -$ -$ -$

E Transfer to Debt Service Fund 15,134,210 14,211,644 18,224,238 18,224,238 17,602,538

F Transfer to Operating Fund (Operating Alloc) 63,138,014 70,492,356 69,274,762 69,274,762 75,544,495

G CATS Control Account - 18,317,757 10,712,941 18,031,167 16,786,351

F + G + H = I Sales Tax Allocation to Other Funds 92,601,412$ 103,021,757$ 98,211,941$ 105,530,167$ 109,933,384$

Revenues:

Operating Revenues:

Sales Tax Operating Allocation 63,138,014$ 70,492,356$ 69,274,762$ 69,274,762$ 75,544,495$

Fares and Service Reimbursements 29,740,399 27,115,399 33,086,391 28,837,267 29,912,726

Maintenance of Effort - Charlotte 20,709,362 21,330,643 21,970,562 21,970,562 22,629,679

Operating Assistance 1,533,357 7,045,263 6,063,665 9,519,516 7,502,896

CATS Control Account - - 2,000,000 1,000,000 -

Other (Advertising, Misc) 2,728,384 3,455,940 3,231,211 3,583,240 3,698,971

Subtotal 117,849,516$ 129,439,601$ 135,626,591$ 134,185,347$ 139,288,767$

Non-Operating Revenue 12,053,293$ 21,434,421$ 19,014,288$ 15,687,291$ 23,140,268$

Total Operating Revenues 129,902,809$ 150,874,022$ 154,640,879$ 149,872,638$ 162,429,035$

Operating Expenditures

Transportation Services 120,787,533$ 133,822,293$ 139,404,875$ 135,330,152$ 144,355,232$

Transit Development 2,969,167 3,836,648 3,739,876 3,533,817 4,778,876

Marketing and Communications 3,433,428 3,529,291 4,145,939 3,822,768 4,482,711

Executive and Administration 8,112,747 15,591,021 9,989,226 9,824,938 10,649,640

Subtotal 135,302,875 150,279,253 157,279,916 152,511,675 164,266,458

Transfers to Eligible CIP Projects (13,674,704) (4,980,262) (2,879,019) (2,879,019) (1,837,423)

Total Net Operating Expense 121,628,171 145,298,991 154,400,898 149,632,657 162,429,035

Transfer from Operating to CIP 9,241,562 4,607,165 239,982 239,982 -

Total Operating Expenditures 130,603,986$ 149,906,156$ 154,640,879$ 149,872,638$ 162,429,035$

35

Page 40: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

FY2017 Actuals

FY2018 Actuals

FY2019 Adopted Budget

FY2019 Year-End

Projection

FY2020 Preliminary

Budget

FY2016 Actuals

Appendices | 19FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Appendix 2 – Performance Objectives

SYSTEM SUBSIDY

≤ 80% of Total Operating Cost 72.0% 73.3% 79.0% 76.5% 78.3% 79.3%

OPERATING RATIO (W/O Capital Interest) 28.0% 26.7% 21.0% 23.5% 21.7% 20.7%

PASSENGERS PER HOUR

(Bus ≥ 20 passengers per hour) 21.64 20.15 17.73 18.24 16.76 16.85

(Light Rail ≥ 90 passengers per hour) 121.71 117.89 109.52 185.25 107.90 116.54

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 7.6% 9.5% 9.2% 10.8% 10.6% 12.5%

(≤ 15%)

GROSS DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 5.38 5.82 6.09 4.93 5.21 5.86

(> 3.0)

NET DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE

(≥ 1.15) 2.25 2.07 2.05 1.42 1.70 1.67

36

Page 41: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

FY2020 Preliminary Budget Appendices | 20

Appendix 3 – Staffing Summary

Approved in

FY2019FY2020 SLC TOTAL FTES

Bus Operations Division (BOD) Employees

Transportation Services

415010 BOD - Operations 627.00 - 627.00 - -

415011 BOD - Administration 14.00 - 14.00 - -

415012 BOD - Maintenance 178.00 - 178.00 - -

415013 BOD - STS Maintenance 9.00 - 9.00 - -

Subtotal BOD Employees 828.00 0.00 828.00 - -

City Employees

Transportation Services

415050 Special Transportation Services 125.75 - 125.75 4.50 -

411060 Treasury/Revenues 19.00 - 19.00 - -

412010 Transit Center Operations - - - - -

415020 County Human Svc Trans - - - - -

412020 Facilities 14.00 - 14.00 - -

414020 Customer Svc & Information 21.00 - 21.00 - -

416010 Light Rail Operations 89.00 - 89.00 - -

416011 Light Rail Administration 17.00 1.00 18.00 - -

416012 Light Rail Maintenance 60.00 14.00 74.00 - -

416013 Maintenance of Way 58.00 - 58.00 - -

416020 CityLYNX GoldLine 15.00 - 15.00 - -

417010 Transit Security 17.00 - 17.00 - -

415001 Bus General Management 4.00 - 4.00 1.00 -

418010 Planning And Scheduling 11.00 - 11.00 - -

415040 Van Pool Division 4.00 - 4.00 - -

Transit Development

413001 Development Administration 7.00 - 7.00 - -

413002 Quality Assurance 6.00 - 6.00 1.00 -

413003 Engineering - - - - -

413020 North/CGS Corridor 1.00 - 1.00 - -

413050 Northeast Corridor Development 10.00 - 10.00 - -

Marketing & Communications

414010 Marketing & Communications 12.00 - 12.00 - -

414030 Technology 11.00 1.00 12.00 - 1.00

Executive & Administration

411010 Administration Division 15.00 - 15.00 1.00 1.00

411070 City Support Costs - - - - -

419010 HR and Civil Rights 8.00 1.00 9.00 - -

411040 Executive Division 2.00 - 2.00 - -

411050 MTC & Committees Division - - - - -

411020 Procurement Services 8.00 - 8.00 - 1.00

Subtotal City Employees 534.75 17.00 551.75 7.50 3.00

Total Employees 1,362.75 17.00 1,379.75 7.50 3.00

FTE

FY2020 Staffing Levels

Temps

Grant-

Funded

Term

37Novant Health SPR Board of Trustees Orientation @ Noon7

Page 42: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

FY2020 Preliminary Budget Appendices | 21

Appendix 4 – Operating Budget

FY2017 Actuals

FY2018

Actuals

FY2019 Adopted Budget

FY2019 Year-End

Projection

FY2020 Preliminary

Budget

Operating Revenues

Service Passenger Fares

Bus 19,206,656$ 17,772,685$ 17,656,781$ 16,811,946$ 16,931,894$

Light Rail 5,464,159 5,802,079 11,472,561 7,877,715 8,718,860

Vanpool 451,626 377,119 469,692 378,620 369,345

Paratransit 741,372 759,210 761,872 730,923 814,870

Subtotal 25,863,813$ 24,711,093$ 30,360,906$ 25,799,204$ 26,834,969$

Service Reimb & Funding Partners

Airport Connector Services 2,333,803$ 1,165,744$ 200,000$ 450,661$ 200,000$

Fort Mill (WellsFargo) Rt 44 Carowinds 28,845 6,075 8,409 8,409 8,661

UNCC Shuttle 1,009,490 - - -

UNCC Pass Purchases - 253,630 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,275,000

Union County Express 74x 99,737 126,396 126,557 126,557 130,354

Concord Express Commuter Bus 90,827 90,534 - - -

Rock Hill Express Commuter Bus - 125,640 152,369 152,369 156,940

Gastonia Express Commuter Bus 85,283 98,928 159,423 159,423 164,206

Kings Mtn 85x - 44,500 44,500 44,500

Carowinds (N&BS U MYEP) 119,076 75,922 44,411 44,411 45,743

DSS 7,025 7,150 7,025 7,025 7,025

Gold Rush 100,000 - -

CMGS - 484,787 484,787 484,787

Concord Mills (LMS) 2,500 - -

Parking - BLE Decks - 350,000 350,000 391,368

Parking - CGS - 285,829 98,004 98,004 98,004

CPCC Levine Campus - - -

Ramsey Creek Beach Park 149,954 52,665 52,665

Volkswagen Parking Lease 18,504 9,252 18,504

Subtotal 3,876,586$ 2,404,306$ 2,725,485$ 3,038,063$ 3,077,757$

Service Income

Charlotte Transit Center -$ 417,032$ 452,468$ 452,468$ 452,468$

Advertising 1,466,815 1,774,667 1,545,000 1,545,000 1,906,800

Interest Earned 281,422 843,251 641,000 834,521 941,000

Agreements/Leases 260,533 33,528 42,059 42,659 33,670

Miscellaneous 719,613 387,462 550,684 708,592 365,033

Subtotal 2,728,383$ 3,455,940$ 3,231,211$ 3,583,240$ 3,698,971$

Sales Tax Revenue

Operating Allocation 63,138,014$ 70,492,356$ 69,274,762$ 69,274,762$ 75,544,495$

CATS Control Account - 2,000,000 1,000,000

Subtotal 63,138,014$ 70,492,356$ 71,274,762$ 70,274,762$ 75,544,495$

Maintenance of Effort

City of Charlotte 20,709,362$ 21,330,643$ 21,970,562$ 21,970,562$ 22,629,679$

Subtotal 20,709,362$ 21,330,643$ 21,970,562$ 21,970,562$ 22,629,679$

Operating Assistance

Federal CMAQ (for Service Expansions) -$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 7,200,000$ 6,031,000$

City of Charlotte - GoldLine Phase 1 1,533,357 1,920,596 1,736,360 1,736,360 1,471,896

NCDOT (I-77 Mitigation) - 908,350 265,500 521,351 -

Sugar Creek (I-77 Mitigation) - 216,317 61,805 61,805 -

Subtotal 1,533,357$ 7,045,263$ 6,063,665$ 9,519,516$ 7,502,896$

Non Operating Revenue

Grant Funded Operating Projects - Fed 390,749$ 10,004,618$ 7,376,605$ 7,376,605$ 14,823,942$

Grant Funded Operating Projects - State - 155,090 231,352 231,352 221,237

State Maintenance Assist. Prog. (SMAP) 11,451,036 11,063,205 11,194,823 7,867,826 7,883,581

Mecklenburg County 192,942 192,942 192,942 192,942 192,942

Town of Huntersville 18,566 18,566 18,566 18,566 18,566 Subtotal 12,053,293$ 21,434,421$ 19,014,288$ 15,687,291$ 23,140,268$

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 129,902,809$ 150,874,023$ 154,640,879$ 149,872,638$ 162,429,035$

38

Page 43: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Appendices | 22FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Appendix 4 – Operating Budget

Operating Expenditures

FY2017 Actuals

FY2018

Actuals

FY2019 Adopted Budget

FY2019 Year-End

Projection

FY2020 Preliminary

Budget

Transportation Services

411060 Treasury/Revenues 1,323,198$ 1,370,044$ 1,585,157$ 1,366,534$ 1,577,089$

412010 Transit Center Operations 1,009,873 1,222,891 1,176,685 1,176,685 1,023,944

412020 Facilities 3,940,032 5,259,118 6,438,972 6,408,133 7,850,983

414020 Customer Svc & Information 1,526,409 1,663,151 1,938,191 1,856,765 2,124,609

415001 Bus General Management 205,914 365,133 948,573 406,632 520,082

415010 BOD - Operations 57,879,967 61,080,524 57,571,696 57,717,294 58,137,798

415011 BOD - Administration 2,045,399 2,116,774 2,145,763 2,145,763 2,162,945

415012 BOD - Maintenance 13,914,622 20,721,194 19,385,959 18,513,973 20,771,130

415013 BOD - STS Maintenance 848,529 1,167,669 824,312 1,274,235 1,004,562

415020 County Human Svc Transp 307,025 307,150 315,180 315,180 315,180

418010 Planning And Scheduling 1,204,223 1,286,085 1,594,593 1,500,408 1,573,515

415040 Van Pool Division 554,679 645,113 669,906 573,317 727,455

415050 Special Transportation Svc 8,369,907 8,121,632 9,295,651 8,551,301 9,137,261

416010 Light Rail Operations 5,852,164 8,225,569 11,268,465 10,947,500 11,557,491

416011 Light Rail Administration 1,035,184 1,339,551 1,733,309 1,487,542 1,697,361

416012 Light Rail Maintenance 1,892,842 7,124,052 7,278,462 6,924,057 8,173,868

416013 Maintenance of Way 2,034,845 3,169,314 4,654,370 4,255,077 5,135,260

416020 CityLYNX GoldLine 1,165,354 1,051,718 1,736,360 1,632,086 1,471,896

417010 Transit Security 5,678,982 6,737,236 8,843,272 8,277,670 9,392,803

Subtotal 110,789,146$ 132,973,918$ 139,404,875$ 135,330,152$ 144,355,232$

Executive & Administration

411010 Administration Division 1,594,237$ 2,094,067$ 1,655,401$ 1,622,819$ 2,243,437$

411020 Procurement Services 543,166 552,158 559,229 423,794 564,509

419010 HR and Civil Rights 553,442 571,154 693,317 700,903 965,470

411040 Executive Division 608,802 607,528 998,713 995,322 1,005,222

411050 MTC & Committees Division 67,372 66,474 51,775 51,308 67,332

411070 City Support Costs 3,795,407 4,411,542 5,140,375 5,140,375 5,302,509

Subtotal 7,162,425$ 8,302,923$ 9,098,810$ 8,934,521$ 10,148,478$

Transit Development

413001 Development 474,544$ 1,200,025$ 1,400,188$ 1,341,421$ 2,905,638$

413002 Quality Assurance 407,376 282,323 351,086 203,794 536,977

Subtotal 881,920$ 1,482,347$ 1,751,274$ 1,545,215$ 3,442,615$

Marketing & Technology

414010 Marketing & Communications 1,390,721$ 1,679,899$ 2,169,262$ 2,054,605$ 1,580,009$

414030 Technology 1,138,212 859,904 1,976,678 1,768,163 2,902,702

Subtotal 2,528,933$ 2,539,803$ 4,145,939$ 3,822,768$ 4,482,711$

Transfer to Capital 9,241,562$ 4,607,165$ 239,982$ 239,982$ -$

Total Operating Expenditures 130,603,986$ 149,906,156$ 154,640,879$ 149,872,638$ 162,429,035$

39

Page 44: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Appendices | 23FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Appendix 5 – Debt Service Summary

FY2018 FY2019

ActualsAdopted

Budget

REVENUES

Federal Grants-BLE 3,125,412$ 78,194,100$

Federal Grants- Non-BLE 2,922,193 2,930,075

State Grants-BLE 1,562,706 26,597,050

State Grants-Non-BLE - -

Local Sales Tax 14,211,644 18,224,238

Interest on Investments 55,265 -

TOTAL REVENUES 21,877,220$ 125,945,463$

EXPENDITURES

Principal Payments-BLE -$ 103,740,857$

Principal Payments-Non-BLE 4,825,000 5,065,000

Interest Payments-BLE 11,608,851 11,914,200

Interest Payments-Non-BLE 5,332,882 5,111,406

Other Payments 110,487 114,000

Transfers to Other - -

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 21,877,220$ 125,945,463$

FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2020-FY2024

Preliminary

BudgetPlan Plan Plan Plan Total

REVENUES

Federal Grants-BLE 68,834,588$ 6,766,200$ 1,847,100$ -$ -$ 77,447,888$

Federal Grants- Non-BLE 2,928,075 2,927,075 2,929,475 2,929,475 2,927,875 14,641,975$

State Grants-BLE 25,970,800 25,923,550 17,251,462 - - 69,145,812$

State Grants-Non-BLE - - - - - -$

Local Sales Tax 17,602,538 17,552,289 17,552,639 16,632,088 17,105,259 86,444,813$

Interest on Investments - - - - - -$

TOTAL REVENUES 115,336,001$ 53,169,114$ 39,580,676$ 19,561,563$ 20,033,134$ 247,680,488$

EXPENDITURES

Principal Payments-BLE 95,741,276$ 33,900,194$ 20,423,975$ 4,221,812$ 4,348,466$ 158,635,723$

Principal Payments-Non-BLE 5,300,000 5,555,000 5,790,000 6,060,000 6,286,600 28,991,600

Interest Payments-BLE 9,301,768 8,979,963 8,864,994 5,045,044 5,196,395 37,388,164

Interest Payments-Non-BLE 4,878,957 4,619,957 4,387,707 4,120,707 4,087,673 22,095,001

Other Payments 114,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 570,000

Transfers to Other - - - - - -

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 115,336,001$ 53,169,114$ 39,580,676$ 19,561,563$ 20,033,134$ 247,680,488$

40

Page 45: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Append

ices

| 2

4FY

202

0 P

relim

inary

Bud

get

Ap

pen

dix

5 –

Deb

t Se

rvic

e Su

mm

ary

FY20

20FY

2021

FY20

22FY

2023

FY20

24FY

2020

-FY

2024

BLE

= B

lue

Lin

e Ex

ten

sio

nP

reli

min

ary

Bu

dge

tP

lan

Pla

nP

lan

Pla

nTO

TAL

De

bt

Serv

ice

Re

nu

e D

eta

ils

REV

ENU

ES B

LE-

CO

PS

Pri

nci

pa

l On

ly F

ed

era

l66

,892

,988

$

4,

919,

100

$

-

$

-

$

-$

71

,812

,088

$

Sta

te25

,000

,000

25,0

00,0

00

16

,327

,912

- -

66,3

27,9

12$

L

oca

l-

- -

- -

-$

S

ub

tota

l91

,892

,988

$

29

,919

,100

$

16

,327

,912

$

-

$

-

$

138,

140,

000

$

BLE

- C

OP

S In

tere

st O

nly

Fe

de

ral (

50%

)1,

941,

600

$

1,

847,

100

$

1,

847,

100

$

-

$

-

$

5,63

5,80

0$

S

tate

(25

%)

970,

800

92

3,55

0

923,

550

-

- 2,

817,

900

$

Lo

cal (

25%

)97

0,80

0

923,

550

92

3,55

0

- -

2,81

7,90

0$

S

ub

tota

l3,

883,

200

$

3,

694,

200

$

3,

694,

200

$

-

$

-

$

11,2

71,6

00$

BLE

- T

IFIA

On

ly -

Pri

nci

pa

l & In

tere

st F

ed

era

l (0%

)-

$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

Sta

te (

0%)

- -

- -

- -

$

Lo

cal (

100%

)9,

266,

856

9,

266,

857

9,

266,

857

9,

266,

856

9,

544,

862

46

,612

,288

$

S

ub

tota

l9,

266,

856

$

9,

266,

857

$

9,

266,

857

$

9,

266,

856

$

9,

544,

862

$

46

,612

,288

$

No

n-B

LE -

Pri

nci

pa

l & In

tere

st 2

013C

CO

PS

Fe

de

ral (

80%

)2,

928,

075

$

2,

927,

075

$

2,

929,

475

$

2,

929,

475

$

2,

927,

875

$

14

,641

,976

$

S

tate

(0%

)-

- -

- -

-$

L

oca

l (20

%)

732,

019

73

1,76

9

732,

369

73

2,36

9

731,

969

3,

660,

494

$

S

ub

tota

l3,

660,

094

$

3,

658,

844

$

3,

661,

844

$

3,

661,

844

$

3,

659,

844

$

18

,302

,470

$

-

200

8A C

OP

S (1

00%

Lo

cal)

2,35

2,00

0$

2,35

2,75

0$

2,35

0,75

0$

2,35

1,00

0$

2,42

1,53

0$

11,8

28,0

30$

201

5B C

OP

S (1

00%

Lo

cal)

4,16

6,86

3

4,16

3,36

3

4,16

5,11

3

4,16

7,86

3

4,29

2,89

9

20,9

56,1

01$

Oth

er

(100

% L

oca

l)11

4,00

0

114,

000

11

4,00

0

114,

000

11

4,00

0

570,

000

$

S

ub

tota

l6,

632,

863

$

6,

630,

113

$

6,

629,

863

$

6,

632,

863

$

6,

828,

429

$

33

,354

,131

$

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

115,

336,

001

$

53

,169

,114

$

39

,580

,676

$

19

,561

,563

$

20

,033

,134

$

24

7,68

0,48

8$

41

Page 46: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Append

ices

| 2

5FY

202

0 P

relim

inary

Bud

get

Ap

pen

dix

5 –

Deb

t Se

rvic

e Su

mm

ary

FY20

20FY

2021

FY20

22FY

2023

FY20

24FY

2020

-FY

2024

BLE

= B

lue

Lin

e Ex

ten

sio

nP

reli

min

ary

Bu

dge

tP

lan

Pla

nP

lan

Pla

nTO

TAL

EXP

END

ITU

RES

PR

INC

IPA

L B

lue

Lin

e Ex

ten

sio

n 2

013B

CO

PS

76,8

92,9

88$

29,9

19,1

00$

16,3

27,9

12$

-$

-$

12

3,14

0,00

0$

201

3F C

OP

S15

,000

,000

- -

- -

15,0

00,0

00$

201

5D T

IFIA

3,84

8,28

8

3,98

1,09

4

4,09

6,06

3

4,22

1,81

2

4,34

8,46

6

20,4

95,7

23$

Su

bto

tal

95,7

41,2

76$

33,9

00,1

94$

20,4

23,9

75$

4,22

1,81

2$

4,34

8,46

6$

158,

635,

723

$

No

n-B

lue

Lin

e Ex

ten

sio

n 2

008A

CO

PS

1,08

5,00

0$

1,14

0,00

0$

1,19

5,00

0$

1,25

5,00

0$

1,29

2,65

0$

5,96

7,65

0$

201

3C C

OP

S2,

045,

000

2,

140,

000

2,

250,

000

2,

340,

000

2,

455,

000

11

,230

,000

$

2

015B

CO

PS

2,17

0,00

0

2,27

5,00

0

2,34

5,00

0

2,46

5,00

0

2,53

8,95

0

11,7

93,9

50$

Su

bto

tal

5,30

0,00

0$

5,55

5,00

0$

5,79

0,00

0$

6,06

0,00

0$

6,28

6,60

0$

28,9

91,6

00$

INTE

RES

T B

lue

Lin

e Ex

ten

sio

n -

CO

PS

On

ly 2

013B

CO

PS

3,69

4,20

0$

3,69

4,20

0$

3,69

4,20

0$

-$

-$

11

,082

,600

$

201

3F C

OP

S18

9,00

0

- -

- -

189,

000

$

Su

bto

tal

3,88

3,20

0$

3,69

4,20

0$

3,69

4,20

0$

-$

-$

11

,271

,600

$

Blu

e Li

ne

Exte

nsi

on

-TI

FIA

On

ly 2

015D

TIF

IA5,

418,

568

$

5,

285,

763

$

5,

170,

794

$

5,

045,

044

$

5,

196,

395

$

26

,116

,564

$

S

ub

tota

l5,

418,

568

$

5,

285,

763

$

5,

170,

794

$

5,

045,

044

$

5,

196,

395

$

26

,116

,564

$

No

n-B

lue

Lin

e Ex

ten

sio

n 2

008A

CO

PS

1,26

7,00

0$

1,21

2,75

0$

1,15

5,75

0$

1,09

6,00

0$

1,12

8,88

0$

5,86

0,38

0$

201

3C C

OP

S1,

615,

094

1,

518,

844

1,

411,

844

1,

321,

844

1,

204,

844

7,

072,

470

$

2

015B

CO

PS

1,99

6,86

3

1,88

8,36

3

1,82

0,11

3

1,70

2,86

3

1,75

3,94

9

9,16

2,15

1$

Su

bto

tal

4,87

8,95

7$

4,61

9,95

7$

4,38

7,70

7$

4,12

0,70

7$

4,08

7,67

3$

22,0

95,0

01$

INTE

RES

T O

the

r Fe

es

114,

000

$

11

4,00

0$

114,

000

$

11

4,00

0$

114,

000

$

57

0,00

0$

Su

bto

tal

114,

000

$

11

4,00

0$

114,

000

$

11

4,00

0$

114,

000

$

57

0,00

0$

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES11

5,33

6,00

1$

53,1

69,1

14$

39,5

80,6

76$

19,5

61,5

63$

20,0

33,1

34$

247,

680,

488

$

42

Page 47: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Appendices | 26

Appendix 6 – Community Investment Plan (CIP)

CIP Revenues & Expenditures

Notes:

1. Excludes Grant-Funded Operating Projects totaling $51.1 million for FY2020 – FY2024

2. Includes some prior year re-allocation but excludes carry over

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Total

Preliminary

BudgetPlan Plan Plan Plan

FY2020 -

FY2024

CAPITAL REVENUES

Federal Funding

Formula Apportionment 6,367,572$ 8,582,885$ 8,261,855$ 8,251,044$ 8,240,448$ 39,703,804$

Enhanced Mobility 804,430 804,430 804,430 804,430 804,430 4,022,150

Bus & Bus Facilities 3,110,281 1,969,000 1,998,000 2,057,940 2,057,940 11,193,161

Federal New Starts 5,400,000 - - - - 5,400,000

Total Federal Funding 15,682,283$ 11,356,315$ 11,064,285$ 11,113,414$ 11,102,818$ 60,319,115

State Funding

State Grants-Advanced Technology 212,220$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 212,220$

Urban Match State Grants 1,415,608 1,581,717 1,105,948 1,050,740 1,126,780 6,280,793

Total State Funding 1,627,828$ 1,581,717$ 1,105,948$ 1,050,740$ 1,126,780$ 6,493,013

Local Funding

Southend Station -Private Funding -$ -$ 1,894,052$ 1,949,260$ 1,873,220$ 5,716,532$

Southend Station -Local Funding 1,415,608 1,581,717 1,105,948 1,050,740 1,126,780 6,280,793

Re-allocated to New Projects 1,500,000 - - - - 1,500,000

CATS Control Account 3,625,847 2,637,971 2,564,964 2,577,246 2,574,597 13,980,625

Total Local Funding 6,541,455$ 4,219,688$ 5,564,964$ 5,577,246$ 5,574,597$ 27,477,950

Carry Over Project Balance

Re-allocated from Prior Year Savings- Federal 535,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 535,040$

Re-allocated from Prior Year Savings- State - - - - -

Re-allocated from Prior Year Savings- Local 133,760 - - - - 133,760

Total Re-allocated 668,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 668,800$

Continue Existing Projects- Federal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Continue Existing Projects- State - - - - - -

Continue Existing Projects- Local - - - - - -

Total Continue Existing Projects 2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total Capital Revenues 1 24,520,366$ 17,157,720$ 17,735,197$ 17,741,400$ 17,804,195$ 94,958,878$

FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Total

Preliminary

BudgetPlan Plan Plan Plan

FY2020 -

FY2024

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

State of Good Repair- Vehicle Replacement 9,816,779$ 12,641,199$ 11,613,344$ 12,318,543$ 12,714,889$ 59,104,754

State of Good Repair- Facilities & Others 725,000 - - - - 725,000

Transit Safety & Security 390,718 220,395 222,144 223,897 226,136 1,283,290

8,048,412 1,781,717 3,200,000 3,200,000 3,200,000 19,430,129

1,240,200 685,010 530,320 390,530 320,740 3,166,800

Transit New Equipment 2,590,227 1,024,969 1,364,959 804,000 538,000 6,322,155

Transit- Other Programs 1,040,230 804,430 804,430 804,430 804,430 4,257,950

Carry Over Projects 668,800 - - - - 668,800

Total Capital Expenditures 1 24,520,366$ 17,157,720$ 17,735,197$ 17,741,400$ 17,804,195$ 94,958,878$

Transit Long Range Capital Improvement

Non-Revenue Vehicle

43

Page 48: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Append

ices

| 2

7FY

202

0 P

relim

inary

Bud

get

Ap

pen

dix

6 –

Cap

ital

Exp

end

itu

re D

etai

ls

FY2

02

0FY

20

21

FY2

02

2FY

20

23

FY2

02

4FY

20

20

-

FY2

02

4

Pro

po

sed

Pro

po

sed

Pla

n P

lan

Pla

n T

OTA

L

Stat

e o

f G

oo

d R

ep

air-

Ve

hic

le R

ep

lace

me

nt

Bu

s R

ep

lace

me

nts

Bu

sA

nn

ual

Bu

s R

ep

lace

me

nts

pe

r ye

ar

Ave

rage

co

st in

clu

de

s co

st o

f ca

me

ra's

an

d p

lan

t vi

sits

FY20

: Re

pla

ce 1

0 B

use

s av

era

ge c

ost

$59

4,01

8

FY21

: Re

pla

ce 1

4 B

use

s av

era

ge c

ost

$61

1,92

1

FY22

: Re

pla

ce 1

3 B

use

s av

era

ge c

ost

$62

9,82

4

FY23

: Re

pla

ce 1

4 B

use

s av

era

ge c

ost

$64

7,72

7

FY24

: Re

pla

ce 1

4 B

use

s av

era

ge c

ost

$66

5,63

0

5,94

0,18

2$

8,56

6,89

7$

8,18

7,71

6$

9,06

8,18

2$

9,31

8,82

5$

41,0

81,8

02$

STS

Re

pla

cem

en

tsST

STo

tal A

nn

ual

STS

Re

pla

cem

en

ts=

17 p

er

year

Ap

pro

xim

ate

Ve

hic

le c

ost

pe

r ye

ar in

clu

de

s ca

me

ra's

an

d p

lan

t vi

sit

FY20

: $10

0,41

1

FY21

: $10

3,47

0

FY22

: $10

6,62

1

FY23

:$10

9,86

7

FY24

: $11

3,20

9

1,70

6,99

0

1,75

8,99

5

1,81

2,56

0

1,86

7,73

1

1,92

4,55

8

9,07

0,83

4

Van

po

ol R

ep

lace

me

nts

Van

po

ol

An

nu

al V

anp

oo

l Re

pla

cem

en

ts a

nd

exp

ansi

on

ve

hic

les

pe

r ye

ar

Ap

pro

xim

ate

Ve

hic

le c

ost

pe

r ye

ar in

clu

de

s ca

me

ra's

an

d p

lan

t vi

sit

FY20

: 16

rep

lace

me

nt

and

5 e

xpan

sio

ns=

21

6 Fo

rd T

ran

sits

+ 1

5 M

iniV

ans/

Ford

Exp

lore

r

FY21

: 16

rep

lace

me

nt

and

5 e

xpan

sio

ns=

21

15

(7)

pas

sen

ger

van

s +

6 (1

5) P

asse

nge

r V

ans

FY22

: 14

Re

pla

cem

en

ts

10 m

iniv

ans

+ 4

Van

s

FY23

: 9 R

ep

lace

me

nts

2 (1

5) p

asse

nge

r va

ns+

7 (

7) p

asse

nge

r V

ans

FY24

: 21

Re

pla

cem

en

ts

1

5 m

iniv

ans+

6 V

ans

754,

000

73

3,59

0

507,

120

331,

890

344,

726

2,67

1,32

6

Bu

sN

CD

OT

Urb

an M

atch

fo

r B

us

Pu

rch

ase

s1,

415,

607

1,

581,

717

1,

105,

948

1,

050,

740

1,

126,

780

6,

280,

792

Sub

tota

l9,

816,

779

$

12

,641

,199

$

11

,613

,344

$

12,3

18,5

43$

12

,714

,889

$

59,1

04,7

54$

Stat

e o

f G

oo

d R

ep

air-

Fac

ilit

ies

& O

the

rs

Sou

th T

ryo

n H

VA

C a

nd

He

atin

g

Equ

ipm

en

t R

ep

lace

me

nts

Faci

liti

es

Re

pla

ce H

VA

C u

nit

s at

So

uth

Try

on

Bu

s Fa

cili

ty t

o im

pro

ve e

ne

rgy

con

sum

pti

on

an

d

red

uce

co

st. R

ep

lace

me

nts

incl

ud

e B

oil

ers

, Ch

ille

rs a

nd

Air

Han

dle

rs

325,

000

$

-

$

-

$

-$

-

$

325,

000

$

No

rth

Dav

idso

n B

us

Was

hB

us

Re

pla

ce B

us

Was

h a

t N

ort

h D

avid

son

Mai

nte

nan

ce F

acil

ity

400,

000

-

- -

- 40

0,00

0

Sub

tota

l72

5,00

0$

-$

-$

-

$

-$

72

5,00

0$

Tran

sit

Safe

ty &

Se

curi

ty

BLE

Cam

era

sSa

fety

&

Secu

rity

Re

pla

ce C

ame

ra's

alo

ng

the

ali

gnm

en

t21

8,64

9$

220,

395

$

22

2,14

4$

223,

897

$

22

6,13

6$

1,11

1,22

1$

Tran

sit

Po

lice

Dis

pat

ch U

pgr

ade

Safe

ty &

Secu

rity

Re

loca

te D

isp

atch

to

Su

gar

Cre

ek

par

kin

g d

eck

; re

pla

ce e

xisi

tin

g ca

me

ras

on

th

e w

all,

pu

rch

ase

th

e c

orr

ect

co

nso

les

an

d u

pgr

ade

var

iou

s o

pe

rati

ng

syst

em

s.

172,

069

-

- -

- 17

2,06

9

Sub

tota

l39

0,71

8$

220,

395

$

22

2,14

4$

223,

897

$

22

6,13

6$

1,28

3,29

0$

Tran

sit

Lon

g R

ange

Cap

ital

Imp

rove

me

nt

BLE

- L

oca

l Sh

are

De

velo

pm

en

tC

on

tin

ue

fu

nd

ing

the

loca

l sh

are

of

the

BLE

pro

ject

1,23

2,80

4$

-$

-$

-

$

-$

1,

232,

804

$

BLE

- F

ed

era

l Sh

are

De

velo

pm

en

tC

on

tin

ue

fe

de

ral f

un

din

g fo

r th

e B

LE p

roje

ct5,

400,

000

-

- -

- 5,

400,

000

AD

AD

eve

lop

me

nt

Re

sult

s fr

om

2 y

ear

AD

A A

sse

sme

nt

to im

ple

me

nt

corr

ect

ion

s, e

nh

ance

me

nts

an

d

imp

rove

me

nts

re

qu

ire

d u

nd

er

AD

A

- 20

0,00

0

200,

000

200,

000

200,

000

800,

000

Ne

w S

ou

the

nd

Sta

tio

n

De

velo

pm

en

tC

om

ple

te d

esi

gn a

nd

co

nst

ruct

a n

ew

Sta

tio

n

1,41

5,60

8

1,58

1,71

7

3,00

0,00

0

3,00

0,00

0

3,00

0,00

0

11,9

97,3

25

Sub

tota

l8,

048,

412

$

1,

781,

717

$

3,

200,

000

$

3,

200,

000

$

3,

200,

000

$

19

,430

,129

$

Page 49: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Append

ices

| 2

8FY

202

0 P

relim

inary

Bud

get

Ap

pen

dix

6 –

Cap

ital

Exp

end

itu

re D

etai

ls

FY20

20FY

2021

FY20

22FY

2023

FY20

24FY

2020

-

FY20

24 P

rop

ose

d P

rop

ose

d P

lan

Pla

n P

lan

TO

TAL

No

n-R

eve

nu

e V

eh

icle

Bu

s O

pe

rati

on

s (B

OD

) N

on

Re

ven

ue

Ve

hic

le

Bu

sTo

tal A

nn

ual

re

pla

cem

en

t p

er

year

= 5

Ap

pro

xim

ate

ly $

25,0

00 p

er

veh

icle

+ 3

% e

scal

atio

n p

lus

$7,7

00 f

or

Safe

ty E

qu

ipm

en

t an

d R

adio

s

132,

700

$

13

6,45

0$

140,

200

$

14

3,95

0$

151,

200

$

70

4,50

0$

Bu

s M

ain

ten

ance

(B

OD

) N

on

-

Re

ven

ue

Ve

hic

le

Bu

sTo

tal A

nn

ual

Re

pla

cem

en

t

FY20

=3

FY21

=3

FY22

=3

FY23

=1

Ap

pro

xim

ate

ly $

70,0

00 p

er

veh

icle

+ 3

% e

scal

atio

n p

lus

$3,5

00 f

or

eq

uip

me

nt

213,

500

21

9,80

0

226,

100

79,8

00

- 73

9,20

0

STS

No

n-R

eve

nu

e V

eh

icle

STS

Tota

l An

nu

al R

ep

lace

me

nt

pe

r ye

ar =

4

Ap

pro

xim

ate

ly $

46,0

00 p

er

veh

icle

+ 3

% e

scal

atio

n p

lus

$3,0

00 f

or

Cam

era

s, $

2,00

0 fo

r B

ran

din

g

and

$1,

500

for

safe

ty e

qu

ipm

en

t

98,5

00

101,

260

10

4,02

0

10

6,78

0

10

9,54

0

52

0,10

0

Rai

l Tra

ns.

No

n R

ev

Ve

hic

le

Re

pla

cem

en

t

Rai

lR

ep

lace

cu

rre

nt

veh

icle

wit

h a

sm

all 4

x4 S

UV

33,0

00

- -

- -

33,0

00

MO

W T

rack

- N

on

Re

ven

ue

Re

spo

nse

Ve

hic

les

Rai

lFY

20=

Re

pla

ce C

TU-0

45 w

ith

F35

0 H

i Rai

l Tru

ck

FY21

= R

ep

lace

tw

o F

ord

Tau

rus,

CTA

-060

& C

TA-0

62, w

ith

tw

o s

mal

l SU

Vs

85,0

00

60,0

00

- -

- 14

5,00

0

MO

W T

rain

Co

ntr

ol-

No

n

Re

ven

ue

Re

spo

nse

Ve

hic

les

Rai

lR

ep

lace

tw

o F

ord

F35

0, C

TJ11

4 &

CTJ

115

133,

000

-

- -

- 13

3,00

0

MO

W T

ract

ion

Po

we

r- N

on

Re

ven

ue

Re

spo

nse

Ve

hic

les

Rai

lR

ep

lace

CTU

-047

, 200

5 Fo

rd F

350

66,5

00

- -

- -

66,5

00

Eme

rge

ncy

Re

po

nse

Ve

hic

leR

ail

Join

t ve

hic

le f

or

RC

M &

MO

W t

o s

erv

ice

an

d r

esc

ue

str

and

ed

LR

Vs

on

th

e a

lign

me

nt.

Th

e c

urr

en

t

swin

gmas

ter

is n

ot

ade

qu

ate

to

re

scu

e a

n L

RV

on

th

e B

lue

Lin

e E

xte

nsi

on

. M

OW

wil

l be

ab

le t

o

use

th

e v

eh

icle

to

ass

ist

in r

ep

laci

ng

OC

S an

d m

ovi

ng

trac

k se

ctio

n, a

lon

g w

ith

oth

er

req

uir

ed

mai

nte

nan

ce.

446,

000

10

7,50

0

- -

- 55

3,50

0

Faci

liti

es

Mai

nte

nan

ce S

up

po

rt

Ve

hic

les

Faci

liti

es

Re

pla

ce N

on

Re

ven

ue

Ve

hic

les

use

d b

y Fa

cili

tie

s

CTU

-011

: 200

6 Fo

rd T

auru

s

CTU

-018

: 200

5 C

he

vy 2

500H

D

CTA

-061

: 200

5 Fo

rd T

auru

s

CTA

-023

: 200

3 Fo

rd T

auru

s

32,0

00

60,0

00

60,0

00

60,0

00

60,0

00

272,

000

Sub

tota

l1,

240,

200

$

68

5,01

0$

530,

320

$

39

0,53

0$

320,

740

$

3,

166,

800

$

45

Page 50: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Append

ices

| 2

9FY

202

0 P

relim

inary

Bud

get

Ap

pen

dix

6 –

Cap

ital

Exp

end

itu

re D

etai

ls

FY20

20FY

2021

FY20

22FY

2023

FY20

24FY

2020

-

FY20

24 P

rop

ose

d P

rop

ose

d P

lan

Pla

n P

lan

TO

TAL

Tran

sit

Ne

w E

qu

ipm

en

t

Cit

y Fe

de

rate

d V

MS

Pro

ject

Tech

no

logy

The

Cit

y is

pro

curi

ng

a fe

de

rate

d v

ide

o s

yste

m t

o f

ocu

s ar

ou

nd

th

e G

en

ete

c Te

chn

olo

gy.

The

VM

S so

luti

on

wil

l re

du

ce t

he

nu

mb

er

of

reco

rde

rs a

nd

incr

eas

e s

yste

m c

apab

ilit

y to

sh

are

vid

eo

wit

h C

ity

De

par

tme

nts

1,50

0,00

0$

549,

000

$

1,

000,

000

$

77

0,00

0$

-$

3,81

9,00

0$

Serv

er

Re

fre

sh (

TMP

2.4

)Te

chn

olo

gyYe

arly

re

fre

sh o

f o

lde

r se

rve

rs.

Use

ful l

ife

sp

an is

fo

ur

year

s p

er

Cit

y st

and

ard

s13

0,50

0

164,

000

13

3,50

0

34

,000

53

8,00

0

1,

000,

000

Ste

am B

ay L

ifts

Bu

sP

urc

has

e t

hre

e (

3) s

team

bay

lift

s fo

r N

ort

h D

avid

son

Mai

nte

nan

ce F

acil

ity.

37

9,39

1

- -

- -

379,

391

MO

W T

rack

Bac

kho

eR

ail

Pu

rch

ase

a B

ackh

oe

to

avo

id m

on

thly

re

nta

l co

st o

f $2

,000

pe

r m

on

th.

Bac

kho

e is

a n

orm

al

wo

rkin

g co

mp

on

en

t o

f m

ain

ten

ance

an

d w

ill i

ncl

ud

e a

tra

ile

r to

mo

ve p

iece

s o

f m

ach

ine

ry

aro

un

d t

he

ali

gnm

en

t as

ne

ed

ed

100,

000

-

- -

100,

000

Cit

y o

f C

har

lott

e E

RP

Init

iait

ves

Fin

ance

Am

ou

nt

rep

rese

nts

CA

TS p

ort

ion

of

Cit

y's

CIP

exp

en

ses

(~11

% o

f to

tal)

: MU

NIS

up

grad

es;

rep

ort

ing

solu

tio

ns;

MW

SBE/

DB

E m

od

ule

; tra

inin

g in

itit

ativ

es;

tra

vel m

od

ule

; eP

rocu

rem

en

t

mo

du

le; B

ud

get

Syst

em

up

grad

e

262,

285

31

1,96

9

231,

459

- 80

5,71

3

Mo

bil

e A

pp

lica

tio

nTe

chn

olo

gyM

ob

ile

ap

pli

cati

on

an

d t

icke

tin

g21

8,05

1

- -

- 21

8,05

1

Sub

tota

l2,

590,

227

$

1,

024,

969

$

1,

364,

959

$

80

4,00

0$

538,

000

$

6,

322,

155

$

Tran

sit-

Oth

er

Pro

gram

s

Enh

ance

d M

ob

ilit

yC

ivil

Rig

hts

Sub

reci

pie

nt

& C

ATS

pro

ject

pro

po

sals

are

su

bm

itte

d a

nn

ual

ly f

or

reiv

ew

80

4,43

0$

804,

430

$

80

4,43

0$

804,

430

$

80

4,43

0$

4,02

2,15

0$

Firs

tNe

t A

T&T

Pri

vate

Mo

bil

e

Ne

two

rk

Tech

no

logy

Re

pla

ce m

ob

ile

gat

ew

ay m

od

em

s o

n b

us

and

rai

l fo

r co

mp

atib

ilit

y w

ith

AT&

T Fi

rstN

et.

Fir

stN

et

pro

vid

es

a p

riva

te m

ob

ile

ban

d f

or

secu

re d

ata

com

mu

nic

atio

ns

and

gu

aran

tee

d b

and

wid

th

Pro

ject

ed

fu

nd

ed

wit

h F

Y20

NC

DO

T A

dva

nce

d T

ech

no

logy

Gra

nt

and

Car

ryo

ver

fun

ds

fro

m

Form

ula

17

235,

800

-

- -

- 23

5,80

0

Sub

tota

l1,

040,

230

$

80

4,43

0$

804,

430

$

80

4,43

0$

804,

430

$

4,

257,

950

$

Gra

nt-

Fun

de

d C

apit

al P

roje

cts

Sub

tota

l23

,851

,566

$

17

,157

,720

$

17

,735

,197

$

17,7

41,4

00$

17

,804

,195

$

94,2

90,0

78$

Car

ry O

ver

Cap

ital

Pro

ject

s

Tech

no

logy

Firs

t N

et

AT&

T P

riva

te M

ob

ile

Ne

two

rk (

Form

ula

Fu

nd

ing)

668,

800

$

-

$

-

$

-$

-

$

668,

800

$

Car

ry O

ver

Pro

ject

s Su

bto

tal

668,

800

$

-

$

-

$

-$

-

$

668,

800

$

TOTA

L In

clu

din

g C

arry

Ove

r C

apit

al P

roje

cts,

Exc

lud

ing

Gra

nt-

Fun

de

d O

pe

rati

ng

Pro

ject

s24

,520

,366

$

17

,157

,720

$

17

,735

,197

$

17,7

41,4

00$

17

,804

,195

$

94,9

58,8

78$

Un

exp

en

de

d a

pp

rop

riat

ion

s, e

stim

ate

d a

s o

f 11

/30/

2018

, fo

r p

revi

ou

sly

auth

ori

zed

mu

lti-

year

cap

ital

pro

ject

s o

r gr

ant

pro

ject

s ar

e r

e-a

pp

rop

riat

ed

fo

r e

xpe

nd

itu

re in

FY2

020;

loca

l gra

nt-

mat

chin

g o

bli

gati

on

s th

at w

ere

pre

vio

usl

y au

tho

rize

d a

s p

art

of

mu

lti-

year

gra

nt

pro

ject

s ar

e a

lso

re

-ap

pro

pri

ate

d f

or

exp

en

dit

ure

in F

Y202

0.

Note

s:

1.

Excl

udes

Gra

nt-F

unded

Oper

ating

Pro

ject

s to

talin

g $

51.1

mill

ion

for

FY2

02

0 –

FY2

02

4

2.

Incl

udes

som

e pri

or

year

re-a

lloca

tion

but

excl

udes

carr

y ove

r

46

Page 51: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Append

ices

| 3

0FY

202

0 P

relim

inary

Bud

get

Ap

pen

dix

7 –

Gra

nt-

Fun

ded

Op

erat

ing

Pro

ject

s

FY20

20FY

2021

FY20

22FY

2023

FY20

24FY

2020

-

FY20

24 P

rop

ose

d P

rop

ose

d P

lan

Pla

n P

lan

TO

TAL

Gra

nt

Fun

de

d O

pe

rati

ng

Pro

ject

s- F

ed

era

l Sh

are

On

ly

Re

gio

nal

Tra

nsi

t P

lan

Stu

dy-

UP

WP

Pro

ject

s

De

velo

pm

en

t36

0,00

0$

400,

000

$

40

0,00

0$

400,

000

$

40

0,00

0$

1,96

0,00

0$

AD

A S

tud

y-U

PW

P P

roje

cts

De

velo

pm

en

t2n

d y

ear

of

Cit

y's

AD

A A

cce

ssib

ilit

y A

sse

sme

nt.

CA

TS is

re

qu

ire

d t

o f

un

d o

ur

po

rtio

n o

f th

e s

tud

y

260,

000

-

- -

- 26

0,00

0$

Enh

ance

d M

ob

ilit

y P

roje

ct

Ad

min

istr

atio

n

Civ

il R

igh

tsFe

de

ral f

un

din

g fo

r ad

min

iste

rin

g En

han

ced

Mo

bil

ity

Gra

nt

and

mo

nit

ori

ng

sub

reci

pie

nt

pro

ject

s.

87,5

50

87,5

50

87,5

50

87,5

50

87,5

50

437,

750

$

Wo

rkst

atio

ns

Tech

no

logy

Year

ly r

efr

esh

of

old

er

wo

rkst

atio

ns,

val

ue

d u

nd

er

$5,0

00 p

er

un

it.

174,

440

22

3,60

0

261,

984

233,

120

225,

120

1,11

8,26

4$

Pre

ven

tive

Mai

nte

nan

ce -

Bu

sB

us

5,88

2,31

7

4,30

5,00

0

4,30

5,00

0

4,30

5,00

0

4,30

5,00

0

23,1

02,3

17$

Pre

ven

tive

Mai

nte

nan

ce -

Rai

lR

ail

5,65

0,67

6

850,

000

85

0,00

0

85

0,00

0

85

0,00

0

9,

050,

676

$

Pre

ven

tive

Mai

nte

nan

ce -

STS

STS

375,

000

37

5,00

0

375,

000

375,

000

375,

000

1,87

5,00

0$

Engi

ne

s &

Tra

nsm

issi

on

sB

us

625,

000

62

5,00

0

625,

000

625,

000

625,

000

3,12

5,00

0$

S70

Ove

rhau

l En

gin

ee

rin

gR

ail

The

S70

Ove

rhau

l En

gin

ee

rin

g is

ne

cess

ary

to p

rovi

de

su

pp

ort

an

d Q

A s

erv

ice

s fo

r

the

ove

rhau

ls b

ein

g p

erf

orm

ed

by

an o

ff-s

ite

ve

nd

or.

Th

e e

ngi

ne

eri

ng

sup

po

rt

wil

l be

pro

vid

ed

fo

r th

e f

oll

ow

ing

pro

ject

s: T

ruck

Ove

rhau

l, n

ece

ssar

y

mai

nte

nan

ce e

lect

rica

l an

d m

ech

anic

al u

pgr

ade

s o

f LR

V s

yste

ms

and

su

b-s

yste

m.

This

wil

l co

ver

de

velo

pm

en

t an

d im

ple

me

nta

tio

n (

bas

e o

n h

isto

rica

l

info

rmat

ion

) an

d e

ngi

ne

eri

ng

to c

ove

r th

e O

EM r

eco

mm

en

de

d m

ain

ten

ance

serv

ice

s at

dir

ect

ed

inte

rval

s fo

r ve

hic

le s

yste

ms.

Th

e s

yste

ms

cove

red

are

:

Pan

togr

aph

, Co

up

ler,

Tru

cks,

Wh

ee

l Axl

es

sets

(tr

acti

on

mo

tors

an

d G

ear

bo

xes)

,

Au

xili

ary

Po

we

r in

vert

er,

Do

ors

, HV

AC

, Pro

pu

lsio

n, C

om

mu

nic

atio

n, D

est

inat

ion

Sign

s, S

usp

en

sio

n s

yste

m, B

raki

ng

syst

em

Eve

nt

reco

rde

r an

d J

ou

rnal

Be

arin

gs.

224,

609

25

8,30

1

297,

046

208,

283

266,

050

1,25

4,28

9

S70

Ove

rhau

l Eq

uip

me

nt

Rai

lTh

e S

70 O

verh

aul P

rogr

am w

ill c

ove

r th

e f

oll

ow

ing

pro

ject

s: T

ruck

Ove

rhau

l,

ne

cess

ary

mai

nte

nan

ce u

pgr

ade

s o

f LR

V s

yste

ms

and

su

b-s

yste

m.

This

pro

ject

cove

rs t

he

OEM

re

com

me

nd

ed

mai

nte

nan

ce s

erv

ice

s at

dir

ect

ed

inte

rval

s fo

r

veh

icle

sys

tem

s. T

he

sys

tem

s co

vere

d a

re:

Pan

togr

aph

, Co

up

ler,

Tru

cks,

Wh

ee

l

Axl

es

sets

(tr

acti

on

mo

tors

an

d G

ear

bo

xes)

, Au

xili

ary

Po

we

r in

vert

er,

Do

ors

,

HV

AC

, Pro

pu

lsio

n, C

om

mu

nic

atio

n, D

est

inat

ion

Sig

ns,

Su

spe

nsi

on

sys

tem

,

Bra

kin

g sy

ste

m E

ven

t re

cord

er

and

Jo

urn

al B

ear

ings

. Th

is o

verh

aul b

ud

get

cove

rs

the

20

veh

icle

fle

et.

Th

e 1

0 ye

ar o

verh

aul p

reli

min

ary

est

imat

es

are

incl

ud

ed

in

this

bu

dge

t. T

he

pro

ject

ed

co

st f

or

the

10

year

ove

rhau

l wil

l be

est

imat

ed

12

mil

lio

n d

oll

ars.

Th

eS7

0 o

verh

aul p

rogr

am w

ill b

e p

erf

orm

ed

by

con

trac

tor.

1,18

4,35

0

1,43

0,12

3

1,77

3,49

5

2,25

8,86

6

2,32

6,63

2

8,97

3,46

6

Gra

nt-

Fun

de

d O

pe

rati

ng

Pro

ject

s Su

bto

tal

14,8

23,9

42$

8,55

4,57

4$

8,97

5,07

5$

9,34

2,81

9$

9,46

0,35

2$

51,1

56,7

62$

CIP

Reve

nues

&G

rant

Fund

ed O

pera

ting

Pro

ject

s –

Federa

l Sha

re O

nly

47

Page 52: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Appendices | 31

Appendix 8 – Other Capital Projects Managed by CATS

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Charlotte Gateway Station

Sources of Capital Funding Funding Share Amount

Federal Railroad Administration Cooperative Agreement

Federal TIGER VII Grant Program (FRA) 56.9053% 30,000,000$

Match to TIGER VII Grant 43.0946% 22,719,131

FRA Federal Project Total 100.0000% 52,719,131$

Federal Highway Administration Block Grant 80.0000% 9,140,773$

Match to FHWA Block Grant 20.0000% 2,285,193

Non-FRA Federal Project Total 100.0000% 11,425,966$

FRA Cooperative Agreement Total 64,145,097$

Federal Transit Administration Grants

Federal Grants NC-04-006 & NC-04-0018 for engineering & construction 80.0000% 22,030,772$

Match to FTA 20.0000% 5,507,693

FTA Project Total 100.0000% 27,538,465$

Other Funding Sources & Uses

Surface Transportation Block Grant 18,750,000$

Strategic Transportation Investments (STI- Preliminary Engineering &

Construction) 12,480,869

Proceeds from Sale of Land 11,841,625

NCDOT Rail Division PE Funds 400,000

City of Charlotte funds for engineering, construction & other uses 33,000,000

Other Funding Sources Total 76,472,494$

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 168,156,056$

48

Page 53: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Appendices | 32

Appendix 8 – Other Capital Projects Managed by CATS

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

CityLYNX Goldline Phase II

Sources of Capital Funding Funding Share Amount

Federal Section 5309 Small Starts Federal Funds 50% 74,999,999$

Local Funds (City of Charlotte) 50% 75,000,000

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 100% 149,999,999$

Uses of Capital Funding (Expense as of 11/30/2018) Budget Expense Amount

10. Guideway & Track Elements 18,549,374$ 1,741,464$

20. Stations, Stops, Terminals, Intermodal 1,747,200 -

30. Support Facilities: Yards, Shops, Admin Buildings - -

40.Sitework & Special Conditions 31,185,674 8,725,191

50. Systems 26,514,844 718,370

60. ROW, Land, Exisiting Improvements 1,201,415 656,789

70. Vehicles 41,319,984 10,066,780

80. Professional Services 22,528,395 15,678,898

90. Unallocated Contingency 6,953,113 -

100. Finance Charges - -

100% Local Funded Art in Transit 99,185

TOTAL PROJECT EXPENSE 149,999,999$ 37,686,677$

49

Page 54: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Appendices | 33

Appendix 9 – FY2020 Budget Schedule

FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Month Date Present/Deliver To Details

Nov 2 City Strategy & Budget FY20-FY24 Capital Budget & FY20 – FY29 Capital Needs Assessment due to City Budget

21 City Strategy & Budget FY20/21 Operating Budget due to City Budget

Jan 23 Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC)

CEO Recommended Budget: Overview

Feb 7 Council Budget Committee CEO Recommended Budget: Overview

7 Transit Services Advisory Committee (TSAC)

CEO Recommended Budget: Overview

19 Citizen Transit Advisory Group (CTAG)

CEO Recommended Budget: Overview

20 MTC Managers Presentation of Key Operating & Capital Programs:

• Bus/STS/Vanpool

• Service Planning

• Light Rail/Streetcar/Facilities

• Safety & Security

20 City Council Budget Workshop

CEO Recommended Budget: Overview

27 MTC Presentation of Key Operating & Capital Programs:

• Bus/STS/Vanpool

• Service Planning

• Light Rail/Streetcar/Facilities

• Safety & Security

Mar 20 MTC Managers Presentation of Key Community Investment Plan (CIP) Presentation of Adjustments to FY2020 Preliminary Budget

27 MTC Presentation of Key Community Investment Plan (CIP) Presentation of Adjustments to FY2020 Preliminary Budget

Apr 16 CTAG Presentation of Key Community Investment Plan (CIP) Presentation of Adjustments to FY2020 Preliminary Budget Recommendation of CEO Recommended Budget to MTC

17 MTC Managers Recommendation of CEO Recommended Budget to City Council

24 MTC Recommendation of CEO Recommended Budget to City Council

Jun City Council Adopt Budget

50

Page 55: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

51

Page 56: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

52

Page 57: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

53

Page 58: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

54

Page 59: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

55

Page 60: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

56

Page 61: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

57

Page 62: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

58

Page 63: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

59

Page 64: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

60

Page 65: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

61

Page 66: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

62

Page 67: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

63

Page 68: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

64

Page 69: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

65

Page 70: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

66

Page 71: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

67

Page 72: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan
Page 73: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION INFORMATION ITEM STAFF SUMMARY

SUBJECT: CEO Recommended DATE: January 23, 2019 FY2019 Operating and Community Investment Plan Budget Amendment

1.0 PURPOSE/SCOPE: This item advises that the Chief Executive Officer will recommend an amendment to the CATS FY2019 Operating and Community Investment Plan Budget.

2.0 BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: On April 25, 2018; the Metropolitan Transit Commission took action to approve the FY2019 Transit Operating Budget and the FY2019-2023 Transit Community Investment Plan (CIP) budget. The CATS FY2019 Operating Budget and FY2019-2023 Community Investment Plan (CIP) were presented in compliance with the Transit Governance Interlocal Agreement. The balanced budgets were developed in compliance with CATS Financial Policy guidelines and objectives.

In the months following approval, CATS received Notice of Funding Opportunities (NOFO) from Federal Transit Administration and North Carolina Department of Transportation. The NOFO’s allowed the department to purchase vehicles and receive additional operating assistance.

Changes to the FY2019 Operating Budget are below • Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning grant for Lynx Silver Line awarded

for $920,000 in Federal Funding.• Reduction of State Maintenance Assistance Program (SMAP) funds by

$3,311,242• Increase of Federal CMAQ Operating Funds for Lynx Blue Line $3,200,000• Projects originally budgeted in CIP moved to Operating due to the nature of the

task.o ADA Study $300,000 o Regional Transit Plan Study $325,000o Corridor Studies $1,079,095

68

Page 74: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Changes to the FY2019 CIP Budget are below • Bus Infrastructure grant to purchase MCI Buses $5,932,800 in Federal Funding.• Reduce CIP budget for projects moved to Operating budget

o ADA Study $300,000o Regional Transit Plan Study $325,000o Corridor Studies $1,079,095

3.0 PROCUREMENT BACKGROUND: N/A

4.0 POLICY IMPACT: The recommended FY2019 Operating and Community Investment Plan (CIP) Budget Amendment remain in compliance with the following MTC Policy directives:

1) CATS Mission, Vision and Strategic Goals2) CATS Financial Policies (Rev. 2016)3) The 2030 Transit Corridor System Plan4) CATS Service and Fare Policies

5.0 ECONOMIC IMPACT: N/A

6.0 ALTERNATIVES: N/A

7.0 RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable at this time since information is being presented for review by the MTC.

8.0 ATTACHMENT(S): N/A

SUBMITTED AND RECOMMENDED BY:

__________________________________________ John M. Lewis, Jr. Chief Executive Officer, Charlotte Area Transit System Director of Public Transit, City of Charlotte

69

Page 75: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan
Page 76: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Mode / Service YTD YTD Percent

Dec-17 FY 2019 FY 2018 Increase/Decrease WeekDay Saturday Sunday

Local

BOD Local 1,020,416 5,897,148 6,543,069 -9.9% 35,570 22,461 13,232

Subtotal 1,020,416 5,897,148 6,543,069 -9.9% 35,570 22,461 13,232

Local Express

Arboretum Express 3,094 22,500 23,608 -4.7% 158 - -

Carmel Road Express 905 3,654 7,647 -52.2% - - -

Harrisburg Road Express 3,054 14,407 21,566 -33.2% 91 - -

Huntersville Express 6,588 49,318 51,608 -4.4% 312 - -

Idlewild Road Express 2,326 13,232 16,888 -21.6% 82 - -

Independence Blvd Express 3,714 25,802 27,502 -6.2% 170 - -

Lawyers Road Express 2,512 16,489 19,326 -14.7% 101 - -

Matthews Express 2,954 21,349 24,365 -12.4% 141 - -

Mountain Island Express 1,226 7,162 8,086 -11.4% 51 - -

Northlake Express 4,691 37,918 33,897 11.9% 239 - -

North Mecklenburg Express 9,972 76,026 78,170 -2.7% 493 - -

Rea Road Express 1,850 16,585 14,614 13.5% 123 - -

Steele Creek Express 1,344 9,941 11,593 -14.2% 61 - -

University Research Park Express 7,916 - 61,431 n/a - - -

Huntersville Greenhouse Express - 1,540 - n/a 6 - -

Airport Connector - Northlake 5,381 14,282 34,346 -58.4% - - -

Subtotal 57,527 330,205 434,647 -24.0% 2,028 - -

Regional Express

Concord Express 2,216 - 14,976 n/a - - -

Gastonia Express 2,465 19,902 16,855 18.1% 138 - -

Rock Hill Express 1,692 15,811 14,248 11.0% 109 - -

Union County Express 1,811 13,453 14,760 -8.9% 85 - -

Subtotal 8,184 49,166 60,839 -19.2% 332 - -6,295 -23.1%

2,622 6.4%

2,062 21.9%

1,611 -11.0%

38,405 -33.2%

- n/a

- n/a

60 n/a

- n/a

9,335 -6.4%

2,336 26.3%

1,160 -13.7%

2,708 -8.3%

959 -21.8%

4,530 -3.4%

1,547 -33.5%

3,223 -13.2%

1,905 -24.2%

- n/a

1,719 -43.7%

5,911 -10.3%

878,008 -14.0%

3,012 -2.7%

Avg Daily Ridership per Month

Dec-18 Increase/Decrease

878,008 -14.0%

Metropolitan Transit CommissionCharlotte Area Transit System Ridership ReportDec-18

Percent

70

Page 77: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Metropolitan Transit CommissionCharlotte Area Transit System Ridership ReportDec-18Community Circulator

Neighborhood Shuttles 42,816 196,612 282,659 -30.4% 1,121 786 295

Beatties Ford Neighborhood Shuttle 13,403 - 85,826 n/a - - -

Eastland Neighborhood Shuttle 17,095 106,459 110,233 -3.4% 582 467 257

Pineville-Matthews Road 3,338 19,670 22,843 -13.9% 115 66 -

Village Rider 6,461 39,419 42,053 -6.3% 243 157 75

Subtotal 83,113 362,160 543,614 -33.4% 2,061 1,476 627

Activity Center Circulators

Gold Rush - - 23,831 n/a - - -

Subtotal - - 23,831 n/a - -

Human Services Transportation

Special Transportation Services 19,328 127,738 128,163 -0.3% 834 248 174

DSS 371 2,101 2,741 -23.3% 17 - -

Subtotal 19,699 129,839 130,904 -0.8% 851 248 174

Rideshare Services

Vanpool 11,520 65,843 72,494 -9.2% 637 - -

Subtotal 11,520 65,843 72,494 -9.2% 637 -

Rail

LYNX Blue Line 381,563 3,807,850 2,476,738 53.7% 22,720 15,298 8,187

CityLynx Gold Line 24,376 127,981 200,473 -36.2% 771 465 307

Subtotal 405,939 3,935,831 2,677,211 47.0% 23,491 15,763 8,494

Total 1,606,398 10,770,192 10,486,609 2.7% 64,970 39,952 22,534

591,114 45.6%

1,596,199 -0.6%

572,601 50.1%

18,513 -24.1%

12,096 5.0%

12,096 5.0%

18,383 -4.9%

320 -13.7%

18,703 -5.1%

- n/a

- n/a

5,977 -7.5%

51,578 -37.9%

- n/a

15,350 -10.2%

2,574 -22.9%

27,677 -35.4%

71

Page 78: Metropolitan Transit Commission...Metropolitan Transit Commission Meeting Summary November 28, 2018 Page 4 of 8 . MR. KOPF: The issue is that the centers, corridors, and wedges plan

Sales Tax Collections and Distribution – October 2018 October 2018 receipts of $8,067,019 were $252,892 (3.2%) above the budget target

for the month October 2018 receipts were $183,306 (2.3%) above October of 2017

Sales Tax Budget Data The model projects FY2019 year-end receipts of $105,872,659, which is $7,318,226

(7.5%) above the budget target FY2019 sales tax budget is $98,211,941 FY2018 actual sales tax was $103,021,757

Local Government Sales and Use Tax Distribution Source: North Carolina Department of Revenue Sales & Use Distribution Report for

the month ending November 30, 2018 Published by NC Secretary of Revenue on 1/10/2019 with actual receipts through

October 2018 CATS sales tax report only includes Mecklenburg County Article 43 sales tax

FY2019 Sales Tax Receipts

Sales Tax Receipts: FY2015 – FY2018Fiscal Year Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Total

FY2018 8,147,197$ 8,436,960$ 8,784,051$ 7,883,713$ 8,884,437$ 9,324,267$ 6,897,695$ 7,842,800$ 9,303,951$ 8,539,748$ 9,277,676$ 9,699,263$ 103,021,757$ FY2017 6,706,169 8,123,310 8,099,598 6,984,259 8,275,157 9,927,120 5,142,666 7,510,515 9,105,261 7,459,176 6,747,425 8,520,759 92,601,412 FY2016 7,470,371 6,971,746 7,551,677 6,188,499 6,607,520 9,383,261 6,142,552 6,944,204 7,858,189 7,952,022 7,781,259 8,765,518 89,616,819 FY2015 6,087,774 6,938,945 5,932,063 7,114,003 6,853,209 8,378,347 5,947,801 5,641,898 6,914,523 6,057,389 7,522,357 7,762,101 81,150,409

CATS Sales Tax Report FY2019

Jurisdiction Population % of Total Jul 18actuals

Aug 18actuals

Sep 18actuals

Oct 18actuals

Nov 18accrual

Dec 18 accrual

Jan 19 Feb 19 Mar 19 Apr 19 May 19 June 19 Total

Charlotte 830,258 40.5% 3,128,556$ 3,904,914$ 3,694,818$ 3,274,062$ 3,571,708$ 4,064,710$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 21,638,768$ Cornelius 30,207 1.5% 112,497 140,413 132,859 117,729 129,948 147,885 - - - - - - 781,331 Davidson 12,572 0.6% 47,218 58,935 55,764 49,414 54,084 61,549 - - - - - - 326,965 Huntersville 57,145 2.8% 212,533 265,273 251,001 222,418 245,833 279,766 - - - - - - 1,476,824 Matthew s 30,849 1.5% 116,044 144,841 137,048 121,441 132,710 151,028 - - - - - - 803,112 Mint Hill 26,690 1.3% 99,810 124,579 117,876 104,453 114,818 130,667 - - - - - - 692,203 Pineville 8,873 0.4% 33,350 41,626 39,387 34,902 38,171 43,440 - - - - - - 230,876 Meck. County 1,053,545 51.4% 3,958,494 4,940,804 4,674,973 4,142,600 4,532,271 5,157,860 - - - - - - 27,407,002

Total 2,050,139 100.0% 7,708,503$ 9,621,386$ 9,103,726$ 8,067,019$ 8,819,544$ 10,036,904$ 53,357,082$

-5.4% 14.0% 3.6% 2.3% -0.7% 7.6% - - - - - - 2.8%8,079,462$ 7,747,794$ 7,725,621$ 7,814,127$ 7,201,246$ 10,297,775$ 6,971,686$ 7,624,864$ 8,920,485$ 8,081,597$ 8,353,234$ 9,394,050$ 98,211,941

7.8% 17.6% 26.9% 35.1% 44.1% 54.3% 54.3% 54.3% 54.3% 54.3% 54.3% 54.3% 54.3%FY19 Budget Target% of FY19 Budget Achieved

Year-over-Year Comparison (FY19-FY18)

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

$90

$100

$110

$120

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Cum

ulat

ive M

onth

ly R

ecei

pts/

Fore

cast

Sales Tax Receipts and FY2019 Forecast($ millions)

FY19 Receipts FY19 Budget Target FY18 Receipts FY19 Forecast Trendline