ME 452 Course File

Northern Borders University

Faculty of Engineering

Mechanical Engineering Program

Course File

Course number and name ME 452 Machine Tool Design (3:2,3 )

Semester and year Spring 2014

Date 5/6/2014

Instructor/s name Dr. Ahmed Embaby

Northern Borders University - Faculty of Engineering – Mechanical Engineering Program – Course File: ME 452 – Machine Tool Design

2

Table of Contents

1. COURSE SYLLABUS ...................................................................................................... 4

2. COURSE INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 6

3. COURSE AND ASSESSMENTS SCHEDULE ............................................................... 7

4. LEARNING AND/OR CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES .............................................. 9

5. LINKING CLOs To SOs ................................................................................................. 10

6. ASSESSMENT OF CLOs ............................................................................................... 11

7. ASSESSMENT OF SOs .................................................................................................. 12

8. LIST OF STUDENTS ..................................................................................................... 13

9. TEACHING MATERIAL ............................................................................................... 14

A. Text Book ..................................................................................................................................... 15

10. STUDENT ATTENDANCE ........................................................................................... 16

11. ASSESSMENT MATERIAL .......................................................................................... 17

A. Quiz 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 18

B. Mid Term 1 ................................................................................................................................... 22

C. Quiz 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 28

D. Mid Term 2 ................................................................................................................................... 30

E. Individual Reports ......................................................................................................................... 36

F. Final Exam .................................................................................................................................... 37

12. RESULTS OF GRADED ACTIVITIES ......................................................................... 45

A. Course Grade Sheet ...................................................................................................................... 46

B. Quiz 1 – Grade Sheet .................................................................................................................... 48

C. Mid-Term 1 – Grade Sheet ........................................................................................................... 48

D. Quiz 2 – Grade Sheet .................................................................................................................... 49

E. Mid-Term 2 – Grade Sheet ........................................................................................................... 49

F. Individual Report – Grade Sheet................................................................................................... 50

G. Final Exam – Grade Sheet ............................................................................................................ 51

13. EXAMPLES OF STUDENT WORK .............................................................................. 52

A. Samples of Quiz 1 ......................................................................................................................... 53

B. Samples of Mid-Term 1 ................................................................................................................ 62


3

C. Samples of Quiz 2 ......................................................................................................................... 78

D. Samples of Mid-Term 2 ................................................................................................................ 83

E. Samples of Individual Reports ...................................................................................................... 99

F. Samples of Final Exam ............................................................................................................... 158

14. CLOs ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 192

A. Direct Assessment Plan .............................................................................................................. 192

B. Direct assessment of CLO#1 ...................................................................................................... 193

C. Direct assessment of CLO#2 ...................................................................................................... 194

D. Direct assessment of CLO#3 ...................................................................................................... 195

E. Direct assessment of CLO#4 ...................................................................................................... 196

F. Direct assessment of CLO#5 ...................................................................................................... 197

G. Direct assessment of CLO#6 ...................................................................................................... 198

H. Direct assessment of CLOs ......................................................................................................... 199

15. INDIRECT ASSESSMENT FOR CLOs ....................................................................... 200

A. ME 452 Machine Tool Design - Course Evaluation Form ......................................................... 201

B. Indirect Assessment Results for CLOs ....................................................................................... 202

16. DIRECT ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT OUTCOMES .............................................. 204

A. Outcome 3c: Assessment tool #1 ................................................................................................ 205

B. Outcome 3c: Assessment tool 2 .................................................................................................. 208

C. Outcome 3c: Overall ................................................................................................................... 211

D. Outcome 3e: Assessment tool #1 ................................................................................................ 213

E. Outcome 3e: Assessment tool 2 .................................................................................................. 216

F. Outcome 3e: Overall ................................................................................................................... 219

17. EXAMPLES OF STUDENT WORK FOR 3c RUBRIC .............................................. 221

A. Mid-Term 2 – Question 1 ........................................................................................................... 222

B. Final Exam – Question 3 ............................................................................................................ 231

18. EXAMPLES OF STUDENT WORK FOR 3e RUBRIC .............................................. 238

C. Mid-Term 2 – Question 2 ........................................................................................................... 239

D. Final Exam – Question 1 ............................................................................................................ 242


4

1. COURSE SYLLABUS

Course number and

name ME 452 – Machine Tool Design

Credits hours 3 Credit hours

Contact hours 5 Contact hours; 2 for lecture and 3 for tutorial

Instructor name Dr. Ahmed Embaby

Textbook Design of Machine Tools ( 5th Edition )

Author(s): D.K. Pal and S.K. Basu

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Copyright year: © 2008

Other supplemental

materials

Machine Tools Handbook: Design and Operation

Author(s): Prakash Hiralal Joshi

Publisher: McGraw-Hill Professional

Copyright year: © 2007

Specific course information

a. Catalog description Design and working principles of machine tool elements (Speed

and feed of gear boxes. spindle and spindle bearings, rigidity and

strengthening of structures- frames, beds and design of slide-ways

against wear). Power sources and types of drives. Mechanisms

design, motion control and transmission systems in machine tools.

Safety devices and Static and dynamic acceptance tests for machine

tools.

b. Prerequisite ME 353: Machine Element Design

c. Required / Elective Required

Specific goals for the course

a. Course Learning

Outcomes

By the end of this course, the student should be able to;

1. Describe the basic concept of machine tool design.

2. Identify power sources and types of drives for machine

tools.

3. Demonstrate design procedures of machine tools.

4. Compare between the different types of linkage mechanisms

used in machine tool design.

5. Design gear boxes of machine tools.

6. Design spindles and slide-ways of machine tools.

b. Student outcomes

that addressed by the

course

The following student outcomes are addressed by the course;

3c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet

desired needs within realistic constraints.


5

3e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering

problems.

Course topics 1. Introduction to machine tool design.

2. Forces, velocities and power requirements during metal

cutting.

3. Design principles.

4. Design of gear boxes in machine tool.

5. Machine tool structures.

6. Slideways.

7. Spindles & Spindle bearings.

8. Cutting drives.

9. Feed and setting drives.

10. Safety devices.

11. Static and dynamic acceptance tests for machine tools.


6

2. COURSE INFORMATION

Instructor

Information

Name: Dr. Ahmed Embaby

Office: Room#62, Third floor, Main building, New Campus

Phone: 00966058276-8901

Email: [email protected]

Class Schedule Sunday 9:00 am-12:00 am, measurement lab. #204

Tuesday 8:00 am-10:00 pm, measurement lab. #204

Office Hours Monday: 10:00-12.00 am

Tuesday: 10:00-12.00 am

Wednesday: 12:00-02.00 pm

Grade Distribution Quizzes 10

Midterm Exams 40

Individual Report 10

Final Exam 40

Total 100

Notes: 1. Faculty members at NBU expect students to act in a professional

manner at all times.

2. Students have to maintain highest standards of honesty and integrity.

3. No late take-home assignment will be accepted after the deadline

(except under extreme circumstances).

4. Attendance will be checked at the beginning of each class period.

5. Student missing more than 25 % of lectures or tutorial will be

withdrawn automatically from the course.


7

3. COURSE AND ASSESSMENTS SCHEDULE

Week # Topic Assignments (Homework,

Exams, Quizzes, … )

What is Due?

1 Introduction to machine tool design - -

2 Working and auxiliary motions in machine tools - -

3 Machine tool drives - -

4 Forces, velocities and power requirements during metal cutting - -

5 Forces acting in centrelathe QZ1 -

6 Forces acting in drilling machines - -

7 Forces acting in shaping machines 1st Mid-term exam -

8 Forces acting in milling machines - -

9 Design of machine tool structures - -

10 Design of slide-ways QZ2 -

11 Design of spindles - Project


8

Week # Topic Assignments (Homework,

Exams, Quizzes, … )

What is Due?

12 Spindle supports 2nd Mid-term exam -

13 Design of gear boxes in machine tool - Report

14 Safety devices - -

15 Static and dynamic acceptance tests for machine tools - -

16 Report

17 Final Exam


9

4. LEARNING AND/OR CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES Learning Activities and co-curricular activities are the experiences that students engage in that

prepare them to achieve the intended learning outcomes and provide students an opportunity to

demonstrate the performance indicator of student outcomes

Outcome Learning activity

Cou

rse

Lea

rnin

g O

utc

om

es

CLO#1 Describe the basic concept of machine tool

design.

1. Traditional lecture

CLO#2 Identify power sources and types of drives for

machine tools.

1. Traditional lecture 2. Tutorials and Example

Classes

CLO#3 Demonstrate design procedures of machine

tools.

1. Traditional lecture

2. Tutorials and Example

Classes

CLO#4 Compare between the different types of linkage

mechanisms used in machine tool design.

1. Traditional lecture 2. Tutorials and Example

Classes

CLO#5 Design gear boxes of machine tools. 1. Traditional lecture

2. Tutorials and Example

Classes

CLO#6

Design spindles and slide-ways of machine

tools.

1. Individual Report

2. Individual Investigative

Project

Stu

den

t

Ou

tcom

es

3c an ability to design a system, component, or

process to meet desired needs within realistic

constraints

1. Tutorials


3e an ability to identify, formulate, and solve

engineering problems

1. Tutorials



10

5. LINKING CLOs To SOs

Course Learning

Outcomes

Student Outcomes (1)

a b c d e f g h i j k

A A

CLO#1 R R

CLO#2 A A

CLO#3 A A

CLO#4 R A

CLO#5 A A

CLO#6 A A

(1) The level of student outcome: I (Introduced or beginner) R (Reinforced or practice), A

(Assessed or Achieved)


11

6. ASSESSMENT OF CLOs

Course

Learning

Outcomes

Direct Assessment Tools 1 Target2

Indirect

Assessment AT1 (grade) AT2 (grade)

CLO#1 QZ1-Q1 MT1-Q1

70 % End Course

Evaluation Form

CLO#2 MT1-Q2 FE-Q1

70 % End Course

Evaluation Form

CLO#3 QZ1-Q2 MT1-Q4

70 % End Course

Evaluation Form

CLO#4 MT1-Q3 QZ2-Q3

70 % End Course

Evaluation Form

CLO#5 MT2-Q1 FE-Q2

70 % End Course

Evaluation Form

CLO#6 MT2-Q2 FE-Q3

70 % End Course

Evaluation Form

1 Assessment tool abbreviations: AT (Assessment tool ), QZ (Quiz), HW (Homework), MT (Mid

Term), FE (Final Exam), RP (Report), PJ (Project), LB (Lab), SM (Seminar), PS (Presentation),

WS (Workshop) etc.

2 Criteria for success for CLOs

If 70% or more of the students satisfy 60% or greater of any CLO assessment tool grade, the CLO

is "Achieved"


12

7. ASSESSMENT OF SOs

Student

Outcomes

Direct assessment tool Target Indirect Assessment

tool

(c) For the summative assessment (end of

program), the decision was made to focus on

the faculty’s direct assessment of student

performance on quizzes, mid-term exams

and final exam using rubrics for both

indicators. Summative date for all indicators

were collected for evidence of achievement

on each indicator.

70 % End course evaluation

form

(e) For the summative assessment (end of

program), the decision was made to focus on

the faculty’s direct assessment of student

performance on quizzes, mid-term exams

and final exam using rubrics for both

indicators. Summative date for all indicators

were collected for evidence of achievement

on each indicator.

70 % End course evaluation

form

2 Criteria for success for SOs

If 70% or more of the students meet or exceed expectations of each performance indicator (PI)

of student, the PI is "Achieved".

If all PIs of the outcome are achieved, student outcome is "Achieved".


13

8. LIST OF STUDENTS

No. Student ID Name االسم

1 1000121 Thamer Hakeem Awad Al-Enizi عوض العنزيثامر حكيم

2 1000043 Zabn Aiash Matar Al-Rwoili زبن عياش مطر الرويلي

3 1000253 Amer Bader Ghiad Al-Lamei عامر بدر غياض اللميع

4 1000141 Abdulrahman Hardan Mohamed Al-Enizi عبد الرحمن حردان محمد العنزي


14

9. TEACHING MATERIAL


15

A. Text Book


16

10. STUDENT ATTENDANCE

No. Student ID Name االسم W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15

1 1000121

Thamer

Hakeem

Awad

Al-Enizi

ثامر حكيم

عوض

العنزي

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0

2 1000043

Zabn

Aiash

Matar

Al-

Rwoili

زبن عياش

مطر

الرويلي

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 1000253

Amer

Bader

Ghiad

Al-

Lamei

عامر بدر

غياض

اللميع

0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1

4 1000141

Abdulr

ahman

Hardan

Moham

ed Al-

Enizi

عبد الرحمن

حردان

محمد

العنزي

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1

1: Attend

0: Absent

Northern Border University - Faculty of Engineering – Mechanical Engineering Program – Course File: ME 452 Machine Tool Design

17

11. ASSESSMENT MATERIAL


18

A. Quiz 1


19

Model answer of Quiz 1


20


21


22

B. Mid Term 1


23

Model answer of Mid Term 1


24


25


26


27


28

C. Quiz 2


29

Model answer of Quiz 2


30

D. Mid Term 2


31

Model answer of Mid Term 2


32


33


34


35


36

E. Individual Reports

Instruction 1. Description: The student will prepare a research in one of the topics of the

course.

2. The ideal number of pages for the research is 10

3. The due date is in week 16

4. Any research submits after the deadline will not be accepted and scored

zero.


37

F. Final Exam


38

Model answer of Final Exam


39


40


41


42


43


44


45

12. RESULTS OF GRADED ACTIVITIES


46

A. Course Grade Sheet

Course Grade

Qu

iz 1

Mid

term

1

Qu

iz 2

Mid

term

2

Ind

ivid

ual

Re

po

rt

Fin

al E

xam

To

tal

Gra

de

Students Information

No االسم Name ID Max.

Grade 5 20 5 20 10 40 100

+Thamer Al-Enizi 1000121 3.5 12 5 15 9.5 31 76 C ثامر حكيم عوض العنزي 1

+Zabn Al-Rwoili 1000043 4.5 18 5 20 9.5 38 95 A زبن عياش مطر الرويلي 2

+Amer Al-Lamei 1000253 4 5 5 18 9 34 75 C عامر بدر غياض اللميع 3

4 عبد الرحمن حردان محمد

العنزي

Abdulrahman Al-

Enizi 1000141 4 6 4 17 10 29 70 C

Number of

student Passed Failed IC IP

Class

performance

4 4 0 100%


47

25.0

0.0 0.0 0.0

50.0

25.0

0.0 0.0 0.005

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100

A+ A B+ B C+ C D+ D F

Per

ceta

ge o

f St

ud

ents

ME 452 Final Results


48

B. Quiz 1 – Grade Sheet

C. Mid-Term 1 – Grade Sheet

Quiz 1 grade sheet CLO/ TOP CLO#1 CLO#3

Students Information Q Q#1 Q#2 Total


Grade 2.5 2.5 5

Thamer Al-Enizi 1000121 1.5 2 3.5 ثامر حكيم عوض العنزي 1

Zabn Al-Rwoili 1000043 2.5 2 4.5 زبن عياش مطر الرويلي 2

Amer Al-Lamei 1000253 2 2 4 عامر بدر غياض اللميع 3

عبد الرحمن حردان محمد العنزي 4Abdulrahman Al-

Enizi 1000141 2 2 4

Midterm 1 grade sheet CLO/ TOP CLO#1 CLO#2 CLO#3 CLO#4

Students Information Q Q#1 Q#2 Q#4 Q#3 Total


Grade 5 5 5 5 20

Thamer Al-Enizi 1000121 4 5 3 0 12 ثامر حكيم عوض العنزي 1

Zabn Al-Rwoili 1000043 5 5 3 5 18 زبن عياش مطر الرويلي 2

Amer Al-Lamei 1000253 0 2 3 0 5 عامر بدر غياض اللميع 3

4 حردان محمد عبد الرحمن

العنزي

Abdulrahman Al-

Enizi 1000141 0 5 1 0 6


49

D. Quiz 2 – Grade Sheet

E. Mid-Term 2 – Grade Sheet

Quiz 2 grade sheet CLO/ TOP TOP#1 TOP#2 CLO#4

Students Information Q Q#1 Q#2 Q#3 Total


Grade 1 2 2 5

Thamer Al-Enizi 1000121 1 2 2 5 ثامر حكيم عوض العنزي 1

Zabn Al-Rwoili 1000043 1 2 2 5 زبن عياش مطر الرويلي 2

Amer Al-Lamei 1000253 1 2 2 5 عامر بدر غياض اللميع 3


العنزي

Abdulrahman Al-

Enizi 1000141 1 2 1 4

Midterm 2 grade sheet CLO/ TOP CLO#5 CLO#6

Students Information Q Q#1 Q#2 Total


Grade 10 10 20

Thamer Al-Enizi 1000121 5 10 15 ثامر حكيم عوض العنزي 1

Zabn Al-Rwoili 1000043 10 10 20 زبن عياش مطر الرويلي 2

Amer Al-Lamei 1000253 8 10 18 عامر بدر غياض اللميع 3

عبد الرحمن حردان محمد العنزي 4Abdulrahman Al-

Enizi 1000141 7 10 17


50

F. Individual Report – Grade Sheet

Individual report grade sheet CLO/ TOP TOP#4,6

Students Information Q Q#1 Total


Grade 10 10

Thamer Al-Enizi 1000121 9.5 9.5 ثامر حكيم عوض العنزي 1

Zabn Al-Rwoili 1000043 9.5 9.5 زبن عياش مطر الرويلي 2

Amer Al-Lamei 1000253 9 9 عامر بدر غياض اللميع 3


العنزي

Abdulrahman Al-

Enizi 1000141 10 10


51

G. Final Exam – Grade Sheet

Final exam grade sheet CLO/ TOP CLO#2 CLO#5 CLO#6 TOP#7

Students Information Q Q#1 Q#2 Q#3 Q#4 Total


Grade 10 10 10 10 40

Thamer Al-Enizi 1000121 10 7 6 8 31 ثامر حكيم عوض العنزي 1

Zabn Al-Rwoili 1000043 10 10 10 8 38 زبن عياش مطر الرويلي 2

Amer Al-Lamei 1000253 10 7 8 9 34 عامر بدر غياض اللميع 3


العنزي

Abdulrahman Al-

Enizi 1000141 10 3 8 8 29


52

13. EXAMPLES OF STUDENT WORK


53

A. Samples of Quiz 1

(Good)


54


55


56

(Averege)


57


58


59

(Poor)


60


61


62

B. Samples of Mid-Term 1

(Good)


63


64


65


66


67


68


69

(Average)


70


71


72


73


74

(Poor)


75


76


77


78

C. Samples of Quiz 2

(Good)


79


80


81

(Average)


82


83

D. Samples of Mid-Term 2

(Good)


84


85


86


87


88


89


90

(Average)


91


92


93


94


95

(Poor)


96


97


98


99

E. Samples of Individual Reports

Gear Boxes


100


101


102


103


104


105


106


107


108


109


110


111


112


113


114


115


116


117


118


119


120


121


122


123


124

Grinding Forces


125


126


127


128


129


130


131


132


133


134


135


136

Speeds and Feeds


137


138


139


140


141


142


143


144


145


146


147

Guideways


148


149


150


151


152


153


154


155


156


157


158

F. Samples of Final Exam

(Good)


159


160


161


162


163


164


165


166


167


168


169


170

(Average)


171


172


173


174


175


176


177


178


179


180


181

(Poor)


182


183


184


185


186


187


188


189


190


191


192

14. CLOs ASSESSMENT

A. Direct Assessment Plan

AT1 AT2 AT1 AT2 AT1 AT2 AT1 AT1 AT2 AT1 AT1 AT1

CLO QZ1-

Q1

MT1-

Q1

MT1-

Q2

FE-

Q1

QZ1-

Q2

MT1-

Q4

MT1-

Q3

QZ2-

Q3

MT2-

Q1

FE-

Q2

MT2-

Q2

FE-

Q3

Total

grade

Max.

Grade 2.5 5 5 10 2.5 5 5 2.5 10 10 10 10 77.5

CLO#1 2.5 5 7.5

CLO#2 5 10 15

CLO#3 2.5 5 7.5

CLO#4 5 2.5 7.5

CLO#5 10 10 20

CLO#6 10 10 20

Total Grades for CLOs 77.5

Assessment tool abbreviations: AT (Assessment tool), WS (Workshop), MT (Mid Term), OE (Oral Exam), FE (Final Exam), Q#

(Question Number), P# (Part number).

Assessment tool abbreviations: AT (Assessment tool ), QZ (Quiz), HW (Homework), MT (Mid Term), FE (Final Exam), RP (Report),

PJ (Project), LB (Lab), SM (Seminar), PS (Presentation),OE (Oral Exam), WS (Workshop), Q# (Question Number).


193

B. Direct assessment of CLO#1

100.0

50.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

ceta

ge %

CLO#1 Describe the basic concept of machine tool design

AT1:Quiz 1 QZ1-Q1 AT2: Mid Term MT-Q1Target =70 %


194

C. Direct assessment of CLO#2

75.0

100.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

Pe

rcet

age

%

CLO#2 Identify power sources and types of drives for machine tools

AT1: Mid Term 1 MT1-Q2 AT2: Final Exam FE-Q1Target =70 %


195

D. Direct assessment of CLO#3

100.0

75.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

ceta

ge %

CLO#3 Desmostrate design procedures of machine tools

AT1: Quiz 1 QZ1-Q2 AT2: Mid Term 1 MT1-Q4Target =70 %


196

E. Direct assessment of CLO#4

25.0

75.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

ceta

ge %

CLO#4 Compare between the differnet types of linkage machanisms used in machine tool

design

AT1: Mid Term 1 MT1-Q3 AT2: Quiz 2 QZ2-Q3Target =70 %


197

F. Direct assessment of CLO#5

75.0 75.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

ceta

ge %

CLO#5 Design gear boxes of machine tools



198

G. Direct assessment of CLO#6

100.0 100.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

ceta

ge %

CLO#6 Design spindles and slide-ways of machine tools



199

H. Direct assessment of CLOs

100.0

75.0

100.0

25.0

75.0

100.0

50.0

100.0

75.0 75.0 75.0

100.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

CLO#1 CLO#2 CLO#3 CLO#4 CLO#5 CLO#6

Pe

rcet

age

%

AT1 AT2 Target =70 %


200

15. INDIRECT ASSESSMENT FOR CLOs

The students have been given the course syllabus and the course information in

the first class. The CLOs were explained at the first meeting of semester, also, at

the beginning of each topics.

The objectives of the chapter are highlighted first before starting the chapter. The

exams and homework problems are listed in front of each question, what is the

CLOs assessed by the question.

The following survey is given to all student at the last lecture, one of ABET

department member distributed the survey and explained to student before

starting to fill it.

The data is collected and summarized in the following form.


201

A. ME 452 Machine Tool Design - Course Evaluation Form

Instructor: Dr. Ahmed Embaby Date: 20/05/2014

Dear Student,

This evaluation form is designed for assessment purposes. Your given answers will be treated

as confidential and only for internal purposes.

In the following table, lease rate each statement on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 = Not at all,

2= Somewhat, 3=Moderately, 4= Highly, 5= Extreme Highly

I. Course

Do you think that 1 2 3 4 5

1 The course serves as an important part of my degree objectives

2 The required prerequisites are adequate and justified

3 The course provides a balance between theory and applied experience

4 The sequence of course topics reinforces my learning experience

5 The textbook and reference materials are useful and adequate

II. Instructor

Do you think that 1 2 3 4 5

1 The instructor is well prepared

2 The combination of lecture and visual presentations helps me better understand

the course material

3 The instructor encourages student questions and manages classroom interaction

4 The instructor is available to students who are in need of help

5 I highly regard the instructor’s performance in teaching this course

III. Student self-assessment

By the end of this course, are you able to 1 2 3 4 5

1 Describe the basic concept of machine tool design.

2 Identify power sources and types of drives for machine tools.

3 Demonstrate design procedures of machine tools.

4 Compare between the different types of linkage mechanisms used in machine tool

design.

5 Design gear boxes of machine tools.

6 Design spindles and slide-ways of machine tools.

Your comment: ............................................................................................................................

.........................................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................................

THANK YOU for filling in this evaluation form


202

B. Indirect Assessment Results for CLOs

I. Course

1 2 3 4 5 Total responses

1 The course serves as an important part of my degree objectives 4 4

2 The required prerequisites are adequate and justified 1 2 1 4

3 The course provides a balance between theory and applied experience 2 2 4

4 The sequence of course topics reinforces my learning experience 2 2 4

5 The textbook and reference materials are useful and adequte 2 2 4

II. Instructor

1 2 3 4 5 Total responses

1 The instructor is well prepared 4 4

2 The combination of lecture and visual presentations helps me better understand the course material

4 4

3 The instructor encourages student questions and manages classroom interaction 4 4

4 The instructor is available to students who are in need of help 4 4

5 I highly regard the instructor’s performance in teaching this course 4 4


203

III. Student self-assessment

Level of achievement of the following Course Learning Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 Total responses

1 Describe the basic concept of machine tool design. 4 4

2 Identify power sources and types of drives for machine tools. 3 1 4

3 Demonstrate design procedures of machine tools. 1 3 4

4 Compare between the different types of linkage mechanisms used in machine tool design. 1 3 4

5 Design gear boxes of machine tools. 1 2 1 4

6 Design spindles and slide-ways of machine tools.

4 4


204

16. DIRECT ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT OUTCOMES


205

A. Outcome 3c: Assessment tool #1

Assessment Results (direct measures) 2014: In this course the performance indicators for

outcome 3c were evaluated directly through midterm and final exams. The results for all

performance indicators are collected. The percent of students that demonstrated each indicator

for assessment tool #1 were as follows: Indicator #1-75%; Indicator #2-50%; Indicator #3-50%;

Indicator #4-75%; Indicator #5-75%; Indicator #6-25%. Based on the analysis of the above

results students are capable to design problem in accepted way but they are not capable to

interpret the results.


206

Summary Student Outcome 3c : An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and

safety, manufacturability, and sustainability

Not Acceptable Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds

Expectations Total

Total No. Of Stude

nts

No. of stude

nts rate

scores of at

least 3

Percentage of

students rate scores

of at least 3

Target

Status

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

1. Design Problem and Boundaries.

0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0 70%

Achieved

2. Alternative Designs. 0 0.0 2 50.0 1 25.0 1 25.0 4 4 2 50.0

70%

Not Achieved

3. Application of Engineering Principles.

0 0.0 2 50.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 4 4 2 50.0 70%

Not Achieved

4. Final Design. 1 25.0 0 0.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0

70%

Achieved

5. Constraints identified and taken into Account.

0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0 70%

Achieved

6. Interpretation of Results.

0 0.0 3 75.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 4 4 1 25.0 70%

Not Achieved


207

Trend line for Student Outcome #3c: An ability to design a system, component, or process to

meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social,

political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (Assessment tool#1)

75.0

50.0 50.0

75.0 75.0

25.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

PI-1 PI-2 PI-3 PI-4 PI-5 PI-6

Per

ceta

ge %

Student Outcome 3c : An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and


Summative data for all Indicators were collected in the Machine Tool Design Course ME452

AT1: Mid-Term 2 Target =70%


208

B. Outcome 3c: Assessment tool 2


outcome 3c were evaluated directly through midterm and final exams. The results for all


for assessment tool #2 were as follows: Indicator #1-50%; Indicator #2-75%; Indicator #3-75%;

Indicator #4-25%; Indicator #5-75%; Indicator #6-75%. Based on the analysis of the above

results students are capable to design problem in accepted way but they are not capable of

achieving a complete final design.


209

Summary Student Outcome 3c : An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and


Not Acceptable Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds

Expectations Tota

l

Total No. Of

Students

No. of student

s rate scores

of at least 3

Percentage of

students rate

scores of at least 3

Target Status

No. of

students

Percentage %

No. of student

s

Percentage %

No. of student

s

Percentage %

No. of student

s

Percentage %

1. Design Problem and Boundaries. 0 0.0 2 50.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 4 4 2 50.0

70%

Not Achieved

2. Alternative Designs. 0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0

70%

Achieved

3. Application of Engineering Principles.

0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0 70%

Achieved

4. Final Design.

1 25.0 2 50.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 4 4 1 25.0 70%

Not Achieved

5. Constraints identified and taken into Account.

0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0 70%

Achieved

6. Interpretation of Results. 0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0

70%

Achieved


210



political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (Assessment tool#2)

50.0

75.0 75.0

25.0

75.0 75.0

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

ceta

ge %


safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilitymanufacturabi


AT2: Final Exam Target =70%


211

C. Outcome 3c: Overall

Assessment Results (direct measures) 2014: For the summative assessment of the machine tool

design, most of performance indicators were achieved in both of assessment tools. This is due to

many reasons, the main reason is the limited number of student in the class (4 students); It gives

them more chances to discuss and cooperate during the class, the other one that students work as

a team in the tutorials and participate during the lectures. Some of performance indictors were

not achieved, this is due to low-level of some students.


212



political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability

75.0

50.0 50.0

75.0 75.0

25.0

50.0

75.0 75.0

25.0

75.0 75.0

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

ceta

ge %




AT1: Mid-Term 2 AT2: Final ExamTarget =70%


213

D. Outcome 3e: Assessment tool #1


outcome 3e were evaluated directly through midterm and final exams. The results for all


for assessment tool #1 were as follows: Indicator #1-75%; Indicator #2-75%; Indicator #3-50%.

Based on the analysis of the above results students are capable to design problem in accepted way

but they are not capable to interpret the results.


214

Summary Student Outcome 3e : an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems

Not Acceptable Below

Expectations Meets

Expectations Exceeds

Expectations Total

Total No. Of Stude

nts

No. of stude

nts rate

scores of at least

3

Percentage of


of at least 3

Target

Status

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

1. Identifies engineering problems

0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0 70%

Achieved

2. Formulates engineering problems

0 0.0 1 25.0 3 75.0 0 0.0 4 4 3 75.0 70%

Achieved

3. Solves engineering problems

1 25.0 1 25.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 4 4 2 50.0 70%

Not Achieved


215

Trend line for Student Outcome #3e: an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering

problems (Assessment tool#1)

75.0 75.0

50.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

PI-1 PI-2 PI-3

Per

ceta

ge %

Student Outcome 3e : an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems


AT1: Mid-Term 2 Target =70%


216

E. Outcome 3e: Assessment tool 2


outcome 3e were evaluated directly through midterm and final exams. The results for all


for assessment tool #2 were as follows: Indicator #1-100%; Indicator #2-100%; Indicator #3-

50%. Based on the analysis of the above results students are capable to design problem in

accepted way but they are not capable of achieving a complete final design.


217

Summary Student Outcome 3e : an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems

Not Acceptable Below

Expectations Meets

Expectations Exceeds

Expectations Total

Total No. Of Stude

nts

No. of stude

nts rate

scores of at least

3

Percentage of


of at least 3

Target

Status

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

No. of stude

nts

Percentage %

1. Identifies engineering problems

0 0.0 0 0.0 4 100.0 0 0.0 4 4 4 100.0 70%

Achieved

2. Formulates engineering problems

0 0.0 0 0.0 4 100.0 0 0.0 4 4 4 100.0 70%

Achieved

3. Solves engineering problems

0 0.0 2 50.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 4 4 2 50.0 70%

Not Achieved


218


problems (Assessment tool#2)

100.0 100.0

50.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

PI-1 PI-2 PI-3

Per

ceta

ge %


Summative data for all Indicators were collected in the Machine Tool Design ME452

AT2: Final Exam Target =70%


219

F. Outcome 3e: Overall

Assessment Results (direct measures) 2014: For the summative assessment of the machine tool

design, most of performance indicators were achieved in both of assessment tools. This is due to

many reasons, the main reason is the limited number of student in the class (4 students); It gives

them more chances to discuss and cooperate during the class, the other one that students work as

a team in the tutorials and participate during the lectures. Some of performance indictors were

not achieved, this is due to low-level of some students.


220


problems

75.0 75.0

50.0

100.0 100.0

50.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

PI-1 PI-2 PI-3

Per

ceta

ge %



AT1: Mid-Term 2 AT2: Final ExamTarget =70%


221

17. EXAMPLES OF STUDENT WORK FOR 3c RUBRIC


222

A. Mid-Term 2 – Question 1

(Good)


223


224


225


226

(Average)


227


228


229

(Poor)


230


231

B. Final Exam – Question 3

(Good)


232


233


234

(Average)


235


236

(Poor)


237


238

18. EXAMPLES OF STUDENT WORK FOR 3e RUBRIC


239

C. Mid-Term 2 – Question 2

(Good)


240


241


242

D. Final Exam – Question 1

(Good)


243


244

ME 452 Course File

Documents

Transcript of ME 452 Course File