MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

71
1 MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI Marnee Loftin, M.A, School Psychologist, TSBVI [email protected] [email protected]

description

MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI. Marnee Loftin, M.A, School Psychologist, TSBVI [email protected] [email protected]. GOALS. Acquire knowledge about DSM V criteria Develop skills in Multidisciplinary Team evaluation process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

Page 1: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

1

MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

Marnee Loftin, M.A,

School Psychologist, TSBVI

[email protected]

[email protected]

Page 2: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

2

GOALS

• Acquire knowledge about DSM V criteria• Develop skills in Multidisciplinary Team

evaluation process• Develop skills in determining need for

evaluation• Acquire knowledge about specific instruments

and procedures used in evaluation• Develop skills in writing reports and

recommendation

Page 3: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

3

GOAL 1

GENERAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL (DSM) FIFTH EDITION

Page 4: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

4

DSM: AN OVERVIEW

• Provides guidelines for diagnosis of psychological conditions

• Regular revisions• Significant changes in autism in

Fifth Version

Page 5: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

5

WHY DO I NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE DSM V?• Provides a common language

• Guides the diagnostic process

• Determines if an individual qualifies for the diagnosis

Page 6: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

6

CHANGES IN DSM CRITERIA

• Changes name of category from “Pervasive Developmental Disorder” to “Autism Spectrum Disorder

• Deletes different categories including Aspergers Disorder

• Simplifies criteria• Emphasizes levels of severity and

required support

Page 7: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

7

CRITERIA IN DSM-V

MAJOR CRITERIA ARE DEFICITS IN:• Social-Communication and Social

Interactions• Restricted, Repetitive Patterns of Behavior,

Interests, or ActivitiesAND THAT:• Are present in Early Childhood• Limit and Impair Everyday Functioning

Page 8: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

8

SOCIAL AND COMMUNICATION

Exhibits deficits in (all three)

1. Social-emotional reciprocity

2. Non-verbal communication

3. Developing and maintainingrelationships

Page 9: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

9

RESTRICTED, REPETITIVE PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR, INTERESTS OR ACTIVITIES

Exhibits the following behaviors (at least two)

• Stereotyped speech, motor movements, echolalia, repetitive use of objects, idiosyncratic phrases

• Extreme adherence to routines, rituals, excessive resistance to change

Page 10: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

10

CONTINUED

• Restricted, fixated interests that are abnormal in intensity or focus

• Hyper- or hypo-activity to sensory input or unusual interest in sensory aspects

of environment

Page 11: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

11

IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW DSM V CRITERIA

• Scheduled to be implemented in May 2013

• Will be preceded by massive training

• Simple overview of current criteria

• Still considerable conflict over changes

Page 12: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

12

GOAL 2

The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Process

Page 13: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

13

ADVANTAGES OF MDT

• Gather large amounts of data

• From a variety of perspectives

• From experts with unique training

• Who often focus on particular aspects of person

• Allows data to be shared

• Shortens time for evaluation

Page 14: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

14

THE MDT PROCESS

• Decreases redundancy in gathering information

• Integrates different information obtained

• Synthesizes information for general conclusion

Page 15: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

15

PROBLEMS WITH MDT PROCESS

• Lack of time to implement

• Difficulty with synthesizing

• Handling disagreement

• Implementing consensus

Page 16: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

16

SOLVING THE PROBLEM

• Administrative support of membership

• Administrative support of time commitment

• Establishing procedure for leadership

• Developing format and procedure

• Developing standards for resolving conflicts and writing conclusions

Page 17: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

17

SPECIAL ISSUES WITH EVALUATION OF

STUDENTS WITH VI• Regulations usually require

Psychologist, SLP, Autism Specialist, and Parent

• OT is often added in clinical settings• Important that TVI must be included in

evaluation of student with VI• TVI is not typically included• Will have to advocate for this to occur

Page 18: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

18

ROLE OF THE TVI IN THE MDT PROCESS

• Provide information about developmental process for students with VI

• Summarize interventions attempted

• Facilitate appropriate test administration

• Assist with accommodations or modifications of test protocol

Page 19: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

19

GOAL 3

DETERMINING NEED FOR EVALUATION

Page 20: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

20

DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESS AND SIGHTED

CHILDREN• Emphasis has been on earlier diagnosis

• Process depends upon identifying early discrepancies from expected development

• Difficult to generalize these discrepancies separate from the visual impairment

Page 21: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

21

EARLY DIAGNOSIS WITH SIGHTED CHILDREN

• Poor eye contact

• Poor eye coordination with gestures or vocalization

• No pointing or showing of objects

• Inability to follow focus of another

• Less pre-verbal babbling

• No reciprocity in babbling

Page 22: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

22

EARLY DIAGNOSIS WITH STUDENTS WITH VI

• Are not supported by extensive research

• Should occur at an older age

• Should always consider developmental patterns

• Are based upon slightly different criteria

Page 23: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

23

BEHAVIORAL FEATURES AS PREDICTORS

• Unusual responses to environment

• Insistence on routines

• Stereotypic behaviors

• Special interests or abilities

Page 24: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

24

OTHER FACTORS FOR VI STUDENTS INCLUDE

• Failure to develop language

• Loss of skills that have been acquired

• Intense stereotypic behaviors

• Failure to respond to early interventions

• Specific etiologies associated with ASD

Page 25: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

25

WHY EVALUATE FOR ASD?

• Determine eligibility for programs

• Develop appropriate IEP

• Develop plan for transitions

Page 26: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

26

ETIOLOGIES FREQUENTLY ASSOCIATED WITH ASD

• Retinopathy of Prematurity

• Optic Nerve Hypoplasia

• Septo-optic Dysplasia

• CHARGE Syndrome

• Congenital Rubella

Page 27: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

27

THESE CONDITIONS ARE HIGH RISK AND OFTEN

ASSOCIATED WITH OTHER ISSUES. THE EVALUATOR

MUST BE CAREFUL TO ASSESS FOR CO-MORBID

CONDITIONS AS WELL.

Page 28: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

28

GOAL 4

Knowledge of specific evaluation procedures

Page 29: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

29

CAUTIONS

• Always consists of formal and informal data

• Requires MDT that is aware of and sensitive to needs of VI population

• Requires clinical skills rather than reliance on scores

Page 30: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

30

EVALUATION OF STUDENTS WITH VI

INCLUDES• Developmental History

• Observations and Interviews

• Evaluation of Communication, Sensory, Behavioral and Cognitive Functioning

• Synthesis of Results

Page 31: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

31

SPECIFIC EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Developmental History

Page 32: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

32

DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY REQUIRES DATA ABOUT:

• Pregnancy and birth

• Perinatal experiences

• Medical history/medication

• Family history

• Previous evaluations and results

Page 33: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

33

PREDICTORS OF ASD IN DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY• Family history of ASD or unusual

behaviors

• Pattern of early concerns of parent, particularly about hearing and language

• Early requests for intervention

Page 34: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

34

CONTINUED:

• Unusual interests on part of child

• Lack of responsiveness from their child

• Savant skills

• Self-abusive behaviors

Page 35: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

35

Specific Evaluation Procedures

Observation and Interviews

INFORMAL EVALUATION DATA

Informal survey of schools for blind indicate emphasis on these

data

Informal consists of behavioral observations and interviews

Content and extent depend upon age and functional level

Page 36: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

36

INFORMAL EVALUATION

• Informal survey of schools for blind indicate emphasis on informal evaluation data for determining ASD

• These data may consist of behavioral observations and/or interviews

• Content and extent depend upon age and functional level

Page 37: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

37

BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATIONS

Data should be gathered with concepts of:

• Definition of ASD

• Ways these behaviors are evidenced in student with VI

• Importance of observation in multiple environments

Page 38: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

38

SPECIFIC TYPES OF INFORMATION INCLUDE:

• Sensory

• Social-Communication

• Behavioral

Page 39: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

39

SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS WILL VARY BASED UPON:

• Age and functional level of student

• Access to formal testing procedures

• Professional discipline that is observing

Page 40: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

40

INFORMATION GATHERED SHOULD REFLECT

• Current functioning in areas of Sensory, Communication, and Behavioral

• Strengths in these areas

• Difficulties and specific ways that they are exhibited

• Functional implications of these difficulties

Page 41: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

41

INFORMATION BEING GATHERED

• Can be gathered through actual observation or through video sources

• Is completed by different disciplines

• Is synthesized into a single summary

• Can be gathered through either formal or informal observation systems

Page 42: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

42

SENSORY ISSUES

• Individuals with ASD often exhibit a variety of sensory issues listed below

• Observation of sensory issues usually facilitated by OT and/or PT

• Type of issue will vary by age and functional level

Page 43: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

43

SENSORY ISSUES OFTEN IDENTIFIED

• Problems with motor control and development

• Gross and fine motor delays

• Abnormal muscle tone

• Sensory defensiveness

• Self regulation/modulation deficits

Page 44: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

44

PROBLEMS WITH SENSORY ISSUES MAY RESULT IN:

• Extreme responses to sound, touch, movement

• Excessive movement and repetitive behaviors

• Oversensitivity to textures

• Difficulty with modulation in areas of physical, emotional, and voice tone

Page 45: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

45

SOCIAL-COMMUNICATION ISSUES

Language has been removed as a specific criteria necessary for diagnosis of ASD in the DSM V

Communication remains an important aspect of Social-Communication and Social Interactions

Page 46: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

46

SOCIAL- COMMUNICATION ISSUES OFTEN OBSERVED• Maintaining echolalic patterns of

language• Lack of understanding of reciprocal

nature of communication• Difficulty with interpreting or expressing

emotions• Problems with gestures and non-verbal

cues

Page 47: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

47

PROBLEMS MAY MANIFEST AS DIFFICULTIES WITH:

• Responding to conversational cues

• Managing changes in conversations

• Inferring emotions from voice tones

• Maintaining appropriate prosody in expressive language

• Responding to non-verbal cues

Page 48: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

48

THESE PROBLEMS MAY RESULT IN:

• Difficulty in establishing and maintaining social relationships

• Problems with anticipating consequences of actions

• Difficulty in inferring emotions of others

• Problems with maintaining appropriate level of voice

Page 49: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

49

BEHAVIORAL

Although not specifically listed in the DSM criteria, behavioral

issues are often the most significant for education.

Page 50: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

50

BEHAVIORAL ISSUES OFTEN OBSERVED

• Perseveration on tasks

• Hypo- and hypersensitivity often result in high degrees of self-stimulatory behaviors

• Poor social skills

• Frequent behavioral outbursts

Page 51: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

51

PROBLEMS ARE OFTEN EVIDENCED BY

• Extreme resistance to change

• “Motor-driven” types of self-stimulatory behavior

• Social isolation

• Poor executive functioning

• Fixation on strange and unusual objects and/or interests

Page 52: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

52

SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS: OBSERVATIONS AND

INTERVIEWS• Autism Diagnostic Observation

Schedule

• Autism Diagnostic Interview

• Childhood Autism Rating Scale

• Autism Behavior Checklist

• Gilliam Autism Rating Scale

• Social Relatedness Scale

Page 53: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

53

Specific Evaluation Procedures

Psychological: Cognitive, Adaptive Behavior, Emotional

Page 54: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

54

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT COGNITIVE SKILLS

Individuals may have intelligence that ranges from superior to profound intellectual disabilities. In about 75% of cases (with DSM IV criteria), intellectual disabilities were also present.

Page 55: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

55

PROFILES ON IQ TESTSFOR STUDENTS WITH VI

• Significant splinter skills on profile

• Short-term memory is a strength

• Vocabulary often is a strength for verbal students

• Social judgment is a weakness

Page 56: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

56

SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS: COGNITIVE SKILLS

• Wechsler scales

• Woodcock Test of Cognitive Abilities

Page 57: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

57

REMEMBER!

IQ scores are NOT a good predictor of educational

performance or social judgment for children with ASD

Page 58: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

58

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR

• Adaptive behavior is a relative weakness for students with ASD

• The typical pattern is for areas involving Socialization and Communication to be lowest for students with ASD and VI

Page 59: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

59

SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS:ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR

• Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale

• Woodcock-Johnson Scales of Independent Behavior (Short Form for Visually Impaired)

Page 60: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

60

EMOTIONAL-BEHAVIORAL

• Much information comes from observations and interview

• More is gathered through specific questionnaires and interviews

• Purpose is to explore/rule out other condition

Page 61: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

61

QUESTIONS TO BE ADDRESSED

• Other factors that are manifesting as social disconnect

• Extent to which student can adapt and focus in new situation

• Adjustment to vision loss

• Coping strategies in place

• Concerns of student

Page 62: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

62

OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION

• Complete neuropsychological evaluations are seldom possible

• Portions of these types of evaluations should be considered

• This information will be helpful in planning instruction and remediation

Page 63: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

63

MEMORY

• Memory is often seen as significant strength

• Important to explore what is being remembered

• Often does not generalize to meaningful tasks

• Will be critical information to teach new skills

Page 64: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

64

EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONING

• Ability to plan, inhibit, consider an action and its consequence

• Significant problem in people with ASD

• Results in their becoming “stuck” in non-functional routines

• Will also be important in planning interventions

Page 65: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

65

SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS

• California Verbal Learning Test

• Test of Problem Solving Skills

• Test of Executive Functioning

• Behavioral Assessment System for Children

Page 66: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

66

GOAL 5

WRITING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION

Page 67: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

67

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

• MDT process guarantees multiple results

• Goal is to summarize into a single report

• Report must reflect information from all

Page 68: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

68

INDIVIDUAL PROFILE AS BASIS OF REPORT

• Report should reflect the strengths and needs

• Situations in which each of these are demonstrated

• Extent to which these behaviors meet the criteria presented in the DSM for ASD

Page 69: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

69

RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD

• Provide instruction to decrease need for supervision

• Increase level of independence

• Improve social-communication skills

• Decrease repetitive and restricted patterns of behaviors and interests

• Build upon strengths as well as needs

Page 70: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

70

THE EVALUATION PROCESS MUST ALWAYS

• Focus on a clear understanding of the visual condition and implications

• Consider the developmental level of student

• Provide opportunities for evaluation in multiple settings by multiple individuals

• Continually consider the most important caveat of evaluation

Page 71: MDT EVALUATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING AUTISM IN STUDENTS WITH VI

71

CAVEAT OF EVALUATION

CONDITIONS ARE NOT DIAGNOSED BY TESTS BUT

RATHER BY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND CONCERNED

INDIVIDUALS