MDR-TB in Children

14
1 MDR-TB in Children Session 8

description

MDR-TB in Children. Session 8. Risk of TB disease varies by age. Greatest in infants (< 4 years); Declines slowly to nadir at 5-10 years; Rapid increase in risk with a second peak between 20-30 years. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of MDR-TB in Children

Page 1: MDR-TB in Children

1

MDR-TB in ChildrenSession 8

Page 2: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Risk of TB disease varies by age

• Greatest in infants (< 4 years);

• Declines slowly to nadir at 5-10 years;

• Rapid increase in risk with a second peak between 20-30 years.

Donald PR. Age and the epidemiology and pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Lancet 2010;375:1852-4.

Page 3: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Wallgren A. Primary tuberculous infections in young adult life and in childhood. Am J Dis Child 1941; 61: 577-589

Mortality in relation to age

• Infection in children less than 4 years old progresses rapidly;

• Greater risk of dissemination and extrapulmonary involvement.

Age (years)

Number Mortality

0-1 39 36.9%

1-3 64 15.6%

3-7 225 4.4%

7-16 125 0.8%

Page 4: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

High risk of infection

• TST studies in the pre-chemotherapy era (1920-1950)†

– Cohorts included thousands of children and adults.– Follow-up for up to 27 years.

• Infectiousness of the index case:– 60–80% of children became infected when the source case was

smear-positive.– 30–40% of children became infected when the source case was

smear negative.

† Marais BJ, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, et al. The natural history of childhood intra-thoracic TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8(4):392-402.

Page 5: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

MDR-TB in Children

• Difficulty of bacteriological confirmation often leads to late diagnosis of MDR-TB.

• Lack of DST often leads to inadequate treatment regimens and amplification of resistance.

• Contact history is important: almost all resistance in children is primary.

• Empiric MDR-TB treatment should be initiated in children based on the DST of the contact.

Page 6: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Schaaf HS, Gie RP, Kennedy M, et al. Evaluation of young children in contact with adult multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a 30-month follow-up. Pediatrics 2002;109(5):765-71.

High risk of infection in children who are contacts of MDR-TB patients

• In 119 South African children less than 5 years of age who had contact with an adult with MDR-TB in the prior 30 months:– 24% had active TB– 51% had latent infection (TST+)– 37% had no evidence of infection

Page 7: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

MDR-TB outcomes in pediatric patients with low HIV prevalence

• 29 children treated for MDR-TB in South Africa 1994-2000:– All clinically and radiologically well at 30 months of follow-up.

• 16 children treated for MDR-TB in Peru 1999-2002:– 3 cured, 1 (6%) failure/death, remaining 12 children have

intermediate outcomes demonstrating favorable response.

Schaaf HS, Gie RP, Kennedy M, et al. Evaluation of young children in contact with adult multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a 30-month follow-up. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 765-771.

Mukherjee JS, Joseph JK, Rich ML, et al. Clinical and programmatic considerations in the treatment of MDR-TB in children: a series of 16 patients from Lima, Peru. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003; 7: 637-644.

Page 8: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

MDR-TB outcomes in pediatric patients with low HIV prevalence

• 38 children treated for MDR-TB in Peru 1999-2003 (28 with culture-confirmed disease):– 32 (94%) cured, 1 (3%) failure/death, 1 (3%) LTFU, and 4

probable cures.• 20 children treated for active MDR-TB in NYC 1995-2003 (6 with

culture-confirmed disease):– 16 (80%) successfully completed treatment, 1 (5%) death, 2 left

NYC, 1 had incomplete record.

Drobac PC, Mukherjee JS, Joseph JK, et al. Community-based therapy for children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Pediatrics 2006; 117(6): 2022-9.

Feja K, McNelley E, Tran CS, Burzynski J, Saiman L. Management of pediatric multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infections in New York City from 1995 to 2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008; 27: 907-912.

Page 9: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Household contacts of MDR-TB patients almost always have MDR-TB

• A Peru study looked at 4503 household contacts of 693 MDR-TB and XDR-TB index patients:– 117 (2.6%) had active TB at the time the index patient began

MDR-TB treatment;– 242 contacts developed TB during 4-year follow-up;– Of the 359 cases of active TB, 142 had DST, of whom 129

(91%) had MDR-TB.

Becerra MC, Appleton SC, Franke MF, et al. Tuberculosis burden in households of patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2011; 377: 147-52.

Page 10: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

MDR-TB outcomes in pediatric patients with high HIV prevalence

• 19 children treated for MDR-TB in Lesotho– 74% HIV co-infected– 84% had cavitary lesions or bilateral disease– 10 (53%) were smear-negative at the time of MDR-TB initiation

• Outcomes for 17 who had finished treatment: – 15 (88%) completed treatment or were cured,– 2 (12%) died late in treatment from unknown causes

Satti H, McLaughlin MM, Omotayo DB et al. Outcomes of comprehensive care for children empirically treated for MDR-TB in a setting of high HIV prevalence. PLoS One 2012; 7/(5): e37114.

Page 11: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Adverse effects in children

Al-Dabbagh M, Lapphra K, McGloin R, et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: pediatric guidelines. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2011; 30(6): 501-505.

Adverse effectsIncidence in children (%)

Potential causative agents

Hearing loss 7 – 9 % Km, Amk, Cm

Renal toxicity 3 % Km, Amk, Cm

Gastrointestinal symptoms 12 – 50 % H, Z, Eto, fluoroquinolones, PAS, macrolides, amoxicillin/clavulanate

Hepatotoxicity 9 % Z, H, R, PAS, Eto, FQs, macrolides

Hypothyroidism 6 – 9 % Eto, PAS

Psychiatric effects 6 – 11 % Cs, FQs, thioamides

Skin manifestations 3 – 8 % H, R, fluoroquinolones, Cs, Eto, E, clofazimine, amoxicillin/clavulanate

Arthralgia, arthritis 0.7 – 4.5 % Fluoroquinolones, Z

Blurring of vision 9 % E, linezolid

Electrolyte abnormalities 3 % Km, Amk, Cm

Page 12: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Recommendations

• Diagnosis of MDR-TB is difficult in children:– Children have lower bacillary load; the majority of children do not

have positive smears or cultures.– Uses aggressive methods such as gastric lavage and sputum

induction.– New technologies may prove to have a higher yield.

Page 13: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Recommendations

• Contact history is the most important:– Almost all resistance in children is primary. – Household contacts of MDR-TB patients almost always have

MDR-TB.– Bacteriological confirmation should not be a barrier to initiation of

treatment. – Empiric MDR-TB treatment can be initiated in children based on

the DST of the contact.

Page 14: MDR-TB in Children

USAID TB CARE II PROJECT

Recommendations

• MDR-TB regimens for children follow the same principles as for adults:– 4 or more effective drugs,– 18-24 months of treatment,– Pill splitting is usually necessary since there are few pediatric

formulations, and– Monitor weight frequently since children grow.

• Children tend to tolerate second-line TB drugs better than adults.