Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we...
Transcript of Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we...
![Page 1: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Mathematics of the Faraday cage
Nick Trefethen, University of Oxford with Jon Chapman and Dave Hewett
1 /24
Andrew Wiles Building opened September 2013
![Page 2: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Mathematics of the Faraday cage
Nick Trefethen, University of Oxford with Jon Chapman and Dave Hewett
Jon Chapman Dave Hewett
Paper submitted to SIAM Review available at my homepage (but this talk contains more)
![Page 3: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
On a metal shell, the voltage (=potential) is constant. Likewise inside.
So the field inside is zero.
Faraday observed in 1836: the same holds (nearly) for a metal mesh.
This effect is used for shielding, e.g. in your microwave oven.
photo from Museum of Science, Boston
2/33
![Page 4: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
I got interested in this problem because of an analogy (see T. & Weideman, SIAM Review, last year).
The trapezoidal quadrature rule is exponentially accurate for periodic analytic integrands. Maybe the mathematics of the Faraday cage is analogous, and the shielding effect is exponential?
In this analogy, trapezoidal rule quadrature points would correspond to cross-sections of wires of a Faraday cage.
wires at equal voltage
3/33
?
![Page 5: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
So, what’s the standard analysis of the Faraday cage effect? It must be in lots of physics and engineering books, right?
Wrong! It’s astonishingly hard to find anything on this subject. There may be some literature somewhere, but we have found next to nothing.
To be precise, we focus on the electrostatic case.
4/33
?
![Page 6: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6/33
Feynman’s Lecture Notes gives one of the few treatments, appearing to confirm the intuition that the effect is exponential.
Feynman and this intuition are wrong. The shielding is much weaker, just linear in the mesh spacing.
“
”
![Page 7: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Feynman starts from constant charge, not constant voltage, considering wires of infinitesimal radius. But that’s not right. It’s the voltage that is constant across wires, not the charge. And though a point charge makes sense, a point voltage does not.
Boundary conditions for the Laplace equation must be applied on sets of positive capacity. The shielding must go away as the radius shrinks to zero.
Maxwell (1873) saw this and correctly analyzed a planar model problem (treatise, §§203-205). If there was ever much follow-up of Maxwell’s work, it seems to have been largely forgotten. (Jeffrey Rauch and Michael Taylor are among those who know Maxwell’s contribution.)
5/33
?
![Page 8: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1. Electrostatic Faraday cage: numerics and theorem
7/33
OUTLINE OF THE REMAINDER OF THIS TALK
2. Homogenized model via multiple scales analysis
3. Point charges model via constrained quadratic optimization
… and at the end, a return to the trapezoidal rule
![Page 9: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1. Electrostatic Faraday cage: numerics and theorem
8/33
![Page 10: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
LAPLACE PROBLEM
external field log(|z– zs|)
• zs
← u = u0 on n disks of radius r
?
9/33
Boundary conditions
u = u0 = unknown constant on the disks of radius r at the nth roots of unity
u = log(|z–zs|) + O(1) as z → zs
u = log(|z|) + o(1) as z → ∞ [ i.e., zero total charge on the disks ]
Δu=0
![Page 11: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
10/33
Numerical solution by “Mikhlin method”: expansion in a series that includes a log singularity inside each disk, with coefficients determined by least-squares fitting at points on the boundaries.
(This is essentially the same method Crowdy uses to evaluate the Schottky-Klein prime function.)
![Page 12: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
n = 12 Circular cage
11/33
![Page 13: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Dependence on r : logarithmic n = 12
12/33
This probably explains why your microwave oven is hard to see into. Good shielding needs thick wires.
![Page 14: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Dependence on n : linear (weak!) r = 0.01
13/33
This probably explains why your cell phone works in the Borden Hall elevator. Signals are good at getting through gaps.
![Page 15: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Numerical experiments with zs=2 show, for small r and large n ,
|u(0)| ≈ |logr|/n
14/33
![Page 16: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Theorem. Given R>1 , n≥4 , r ≤1/n, suppose Δu=0 and |u(z)|<1 for |z|<R with u=u0 on the n disks of radius r , –1<u0 <1 . Then
|u(0)| ≤ 4|logr|/nlogR .
15/33
The |logr|/n observation can be made rigorous:
![Page 17: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Method of proof
For an analytic function f with |f (z)| < 1 on the unit disk, |f ’(0)| < 1 .
For a real harmonic function u with |u(z)| < 1 , |u(0)| < 4/π . (See e.g. Gilbarg & Trudinger, Elliptic PDE of Second Order.)
The rest of the argument: convert n holes to 1 hole by conformal maps:
16/33
![Page 18: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2. Homogenized model via multiple scales analysis
17/33
![Page 19: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The effect of n wires of radius r << 1/n << 1 can be approximated by a homogenized boundary condition along a curve Γ. We use multiple scales analysis, matching together approximations in three regions:
inner region: scale of the wire radius, r boundary layer: scale of the gap between wires, ε outer region: scale of the cage, O(1)
We get an effective BC in the jump in the normal derivative of u across Γ :
18/33
*∂u/∂n ] = α(u –u0) on Γ
Equivalently, charge density = α(u –u0) on Γ
where α = 2π /ε log(ε/2πr) . α << 1 : weak screening α >> 1 : strong screening
Physical interpretation: α = capacitance per unit length
![Page 20: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Dependence on r
Actual
Homogenized BC
19/33
n = 12
![Page 21: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Dependence on n
Actual
Homogenized BC
20/33
r = 0.01
![Page 22: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Actual
Homogenized BC
21/33
![Page 23: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
3. Point charges model via constrained quadratic optimization
22/33
![Page 24: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
A disk at zk of radius r << 1 behaves like a point charge of some strength qk. The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is qk?
Can we find these charges by energy minimization?
Key observation: a charged disk has a self-energy of – ½ qk2 logr .
Physics: it takes work to force charge onto a small disk.
This brings us back to the interpretation of α as capacity per unit length. It explains why Faraday cages are imperfect shields.
23/33
![Page 25: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Let us find n charges qk , summing to 0 , that minimize the total energy:
24/33
This is a constrained quadratic programming problem
minimize
with solution given by the KKT equations ( λ = Lagrange multiplier)
SELF-ENERGY OF DISKS
MUTUAL ENERGY BETWEEN DISKS
ENERGY OF DISKS IN EXTERNAL FIELD
![Page 26: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Dependence on r
Actual
Point charges
25/33
n = 12
![Page 27: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Dependence on n
Actual
Point charges
26/33
r = 0.01
![Page 28: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Actual
27/33
Point charges
![Page 29: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
4. Return to the trapezoidal rule
28/33
![Page 30: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Small charged disks can be approximated by point charges to high accuracy.
A charge distribution on a smooth curve can be approximated by point samples to high accuracy — the trapezoidal rule.
So why doesn’t the Faraday cage provide strong screening?
Because it provides an exponentially good approximation not to the zero field, but to the field associated with the homogenized boundary condition.
29/33
![Page 31: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Finite wires, r = 0.01
30/33
Point charges from sampling solution from homogenized BC
Point charges from sampling solution from perfectly conducting shell
field strength 0.023
field strength 0.022
field strength 0.0000000000023
![Page 32: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
True problem
Point charges approximation
Homogenized approximation
POINT SAMPLING À LA TRAPEZOIDAL RULE
Mathematical Summary
31/33
screening is weak and depends on r
far from a perfect conductor far from optimal screening
![Page 33: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Physical Summary
From the Wikipedia page on electrostatic induction:
Faraday screening is electrostatic induction in a surface of limited capacitance.
32/33
![Page 34: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
33/33
Thank you!
![Page 35: Mathematics of the Faraday cage · The challenge for Faraday cage analysis is, what is q k? Can we find these charges by energy minimization? Key observation: a charged disk has a](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050311/5f733cb082e3e26928261091/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
That’s all, except…
Here are simulations for the Helmholtz equation Δu+k2u=0
( u represents E component of a solution to Maxwell’s equations)
The screening looks weaker than in the static case. But there are physical complications to consider (skin effect, induction, resistance, polarization…). There is more literature on this than on the electrostatic case.
34/33
what about electromagnetic waves?